Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 On āśrayāsiddha and dharmisvarūpaviparītasādhana: A Case Study Based on Dharmapāla's Dasheng Guangbailun Shilun
作者 胡志強
Hu, Chih-Chiang; Wu, Chih-ying
貢獻者 哲學系
關鍵詞 Dharmapāla; Buddhist logic; Dignāga; Xuanzang; Dharmakīrti; Jinendrabuddhi
日期 2026-04
上傳時間 30-Jan-2026 10:57:34 (UTC+8)
摘要 This paper presents a case study of the application of Buddhist logic based on Dharmapāla’s commentary on the Catuḥśataka 9.4, i.e., Sect. 1.4 of Dasheng guangbailun shilun. First, this paper provides a complete translation of Sect. 1.4 with philosophical analysis. The adversary’s argument, “Space, etc., are permanent because of not being produced,” is rejected by Dharmapāla due to the fallacy of dharmisvarūpaviparītasādhana, that is, the reason proves instead that space, etc., are not existent. In the meantime, the fallacy of āśrayāsiddha is not incurred, because the reason “not being produced” merely excludes the property of “being produced” and therefore its basis/subject can be not existent in reality. Second, this paper shows that Xuanzang and his successors are under the influence of Dharmapāla in this regard. When arguing against the subject admitted by the adversary, they emphasize that the fallacy of āśrayāsiddha is not incurred if the reason merely excludes or negates some property without affirming any others. In addition, the strategy of two negative usages is applied to not only reasons, but also properties to be proved, and similar examples. However, the strategy of tabiliang seems popular in the East Asian Buddhism through the influence of Xuanzang. Third, there are similarities and differences between Dharmapāla’s thought and Dharmakīrti’s and his successors’ regarding the pertinent issues. Dharmapāla’s thought seems probably relevant to post-Dharmapāla thinkers’. It is hoped that this paper will contribute to the study of Dharmapāla and to our understanding of Buddhist logic and its development.
關聯 Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol.54, No.2, pp.119-139
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-025-09627-6
dc.contributor 哲學系-
dc.creator (作者) 胡志強-
dc.creator (作者) Hu, Chih-Chiang; Wu, Chih-ying-
dc.date (日期) 2026-04-
dc.date.accessioned 30-Jan-2026 10:57:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 30-Jan-2026 10:57:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 30-Jan-2026 10:57:34 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=180829-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper presents a case study of the application of Buddhist logic based on Dharmapāla’s commentary on the Catuḥśataka 9.4, i.e., Sect. 1.4 of Dasheng guangbailun shilun. First, this paper provides a complete translation of Sect. 1.4 with philosophical analysis. The adversary’s argument, “Space, etc., are permanent because of not being produced,” is rejected by Dharmapāla due to the fallacy of dharmisvarūpaviparītasādhana, that is, the reason proves instead that space, etc., are not existent. In the meantime, the fallacy of āśrayāsiddha is not incurred, because the reason “not being produced” merely excludes the property of “being produced” and therefore its basis/subject can be not existent in reality. Second, this paper shows that Xuanzang and his successors are under the influence of Dharmapāla in this regard. When arguing against the subject admitted by the adversary, they emphasize that the fallacy of āśrayāsiddha is not incurred if the reason merely excludes or negates some property without affirming any others. In addition, the strategy of two negative usages is applied to not only reasons, but also properties to be proved, and similar examples. However, the strategy of tabiliang seems popular in the East Asian Buddhism through the influence of Xuanzang. Third, there are similarities and differences between Dharmapāla’s thought and Dharmakīrti’s and his successors’ regarding the pertinent issues. Dharmapāla’s thought seems probably relevant to post-Dharmapāla thinkers’. It is hoped that this paper will contribute to the study of Dharmapāla and to our understanding of Buddhist logic and its development.-
dc.format.extent 122 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Journal of Indian Philosophy, Vol.54, No.2, pp.119-139-
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Dharmapāla; Buddhist logic; Dignāga; Xuanzang; Dharmakīrti; Jinendrabuddhi-
dc.title (題名) On āśrayāsiddha and dharmisvarūpaviparītasādhana: A Case Study Based on Dharmapāla's Dasheng Guangbailun Shilun-
dc.type (資料類型) article-
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1007/s10781-025-09627-6-
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-025-09627-6-