Publications-Periodical Articles

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 Name, Shame, and Blame: Terrorist Designation and Peace Negotiations
作者 李佳怡
Avdan, Nazli;Tominaga, Yasutaka;Lee, Chia-yi;Albayrak, Cagil
貢獻者 國際事務學院
關鍵詞 Terrorism; terrorist designation; civil war; negotiations; quantitative methods
日期 2025-12
上傳時間 3-Feb-2026 11:37:28 (UTC+8)
摘要 How does terrorist designation affect peace processes? A prodigious literature examines the consequences of designation for group capabilities, showing that blacklisting groups may serve as a counterterrorism tool to defang and quash rebel groups. By naming and shaming rebels, governments seek to delegitimize groups and thereby asphyxiate them, denting diaspora support, man- power, and revenue, as well as catalyzing a broader coalition of states against them. At the same time, however, by labeling groups as terrorist actors, states may be closing the door on diplomatic solutions, given the pervasiveness of the norm against negotiating with terrorists. To date, this assertion has not been put to rigorous empirical scrutiny. By leveraging the newly released Designated Terrorist Organizations (DTO) and the Peace Negotiations in Civil Conflict (PNCC) datasets, we investigate the effects of designation on peace processes for 305 groups, 1973 to 2013, based in 79 countries. Our results show that proscription increases the probability of negotiations, especially for stronger groups and for ethnically based groups. We also find that negotiations following designation are more likely when the number of groups on the battlefield is larger.
關聯 Terrorism and Political Violence, pp.1-17
資料類型 article
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2025.2588276
dc.contributor 國際事務學院
dc.creator (作者) 李佳怡
dc.creator (作者) Avdan, Nazli;Tominaga, Yasutaka;Lee, Chia-yi;Albayrak, Cagil
dc.date (日期) 2025-12
dc.date.accessioned 3-Feb-2026 11:37:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 3-Feb-2026 11:37:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 3-Feb-2026 11:37:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/161583-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) How does terrorist designation affect peace processes? A prodigious literature examines the consequences of designation for group capabilities, showing that blacklisting groups may serve as a counterterrorism tool to defang and quash rebel groups. By naming and shaming rebels, governments seek to delegitimize groups and thereby asphyxiate them, denting diaspora support, man- power, and revenue, as well as catalyzing a broader coalition of states against them. At the same time, however, by labeling groups as terrorist actors, states may be closing the door on diplomatic solutions, given the pervasiveness of the norm against negotiating with terrorists. To date, this assertion has not been put to rigorous empirical scrutiny. By leveraging the newly released Designated Terrorist Organizations (DTO) and the Peace Negotiations in Civil Conflict (PNCC) datasets, we investigate the effects of designation on peace processes for 305 groups, 1973 to 2013, based in 79 countries. Our results show that proscription increases the probability of negotiations, especially for stronger groups and for ethnically based groups. We also find that negotiations following designation are more likely when the number of groups on the battlefield is larger.
dc.format.extent 109 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) Terrorism and Political Violence, pp.1-17
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Terrorism; terrorist designation; civil war; negotiations; quantitative methods
dc.title (題名) Name, Shame, and Blame: Terrorist Designation and Peace Negotiations
dc.type (資料類型) article
dc.identifier.doi (DOI) 10.1080/09546553.2025.2588276
dc.doi.uri (DOI) https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2025.2588276