學術產出-學位論文
文章檢視/開啟
書目匯出
-
題名 亞洲電子產業供應鏈移轉策略與運作—以泰國與中國射出成形中小企業為例
STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONS OF SUPPLY CHAIN RELOCATION IN THE ASIAN ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY: A CASE STUDY OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED MOLDING ENTERPRISES IN THAILAND AND CHINA作者 陳進東
Chen, Chin-Tung貢獻者 宋皇志
陳進東
Chen, Chin-Tung關鍵詞 亞洲電子產業
中小企業
供應鏈移轉
制度環境
策略調整
韌性管理
供應鏈治理
跨國比較
中國
泰國
風險管理
制度理論
供應鏈韌性
政策支持
治理機制
交易成本
Asian Electronics Industry
SMEs
Supply Chain Relocation, Institutional Environment
Strategic Adaptation
Resilience Management, Supply Chain Governance
Resilience Management, Supply Chain Governance
Cross-National Comparison
China
Thailand
Risk Management
Institutional Theory
Supply Chain Resilience
Policy Support
Governance Mechanisms
Transaction Costs日期 2026 上傳時間 2-三月-2026 11:27:02 (UTC+8) 摘要 本研究深入分析亞洲電子產業中小企業在全球供應鏈重構與產業轉型情境下的策略調適與經營實務。以泰國和中國的射出成形企業為典型案例，透過質性深度個案研究、文獻分析與實務訪談，本研究揭示，制度環境的成熟度與政策穩定性顯著影響企業的策略取向與治理模式。 核心發現是，企業在「生產交易成本」與「制度合規成本」之間進行權衡，進而形塑了迥異的策略選擇。中國企業傾向於制度化管理與長期技術積累，追求長遠競爭優勢；泰國企業則更側重多點佈局、彈性合作與供應鏈多元化，強調成本優化、快速回應以應對制度風險。儘管兩國企業皆追求成本控制、供應鏈韌性與市場就近策略，但在制度依賴度、治理機制及策略調整機制上呈現明顯差異。 研究建構了「制度—策略—韌性」三位一體理論模型，指出制度環境在中介與調節企業策略實施與風險防控中扮演關鍵角色，突顯其對供應鏈韌性建構的深遠影響。本研究不僅深化了跨國供應鏈管理中制度與交易成本理論的整合應用，更為提升企業韌性與政策制定提供了一系列策略與政策建議，涵蓋了制度穩定性、供應體系多元化、產業鏈在地化及風險預警等關鍵面向。
This study delves into the strategic adaptation and operational practices of Asian electronics Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the context of global supply chain restructuring and industrial transformation. Using injection molding enterprises in Thailand and China as representative cases, and employing in-depth qualitative case studies, literature analysis, and expert interviews, this research reveals that the maturity of the institutional environment and policy stability significantly influence firms' strategic orientations and governance models. The core finding highlights that firms make a critical trade-off between "production transaction costs" and "institutional compliance costs," leading to distinct strategic choices. Chinese enterprises prioritize institutionalized management and long-term technological accumulation to achieve sustained competitive advantages, whereas Thai firms emphasize multi-point layouts, flexible collaborations, and supply chain diversification, focusing on cost optimization and rapid response to institutional risks. While both groups pursue cost control, supply chain resilience, and market proximity strategies, they exhibit notable differences in institutional dependency, governance mechanisms, and strategic adjustment approaches. The study develops a tripartite "Institution-Strategy-Resilience" model, which highlights how the institutional environment mediates and moderates strategy implementation and risk control, underscoring its profound impact on supply chain resilience. This research not only deepens the integrated application of Institutional Theory and Transaction Cost Theory in multinational supply chain management but also provides a series of strategic and policy recommendations for enhancing firm resilience and policy formulation, covering key areas such as institutional stability, supply system diversification, industrial chain localization, and risk early warning.參考文獻 Baldwin, R. (2013). Global supply chains: why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going. In Global value chains in a changing world (pp. 13–59). WTO iLibrary. Baldwin, R., & Freeman, R. (2022). Risks and global supply chains: What we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 153–180. Barbieri, P., Di Stefano, C., Elia, S., Fratocchi, L., & Pensa, C. (2025). Supply backshoring as a strategy to reduce transaction costs in an era of global value chain reconfiguration. Journal of international management, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101313 Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing Risk to Avoid Supply Chain Breakdowns. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 53–61. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management. In Logistics & Supply Chain Management (5th ed. ed., pp. 2–3). Pearson UK. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275 Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Dicken, P. (2015). Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy (7th ed.). Guilford Press. DiMaggio, P. J. P., W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51, 11–27. Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S., & Chu, W. (1996). Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of competitive advantage. Organization Science, 7, 649–666. Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S., & Chu, W. (1998). Strategic supplier segmentation: the next "best practice" in supply chain management. California Management Review, 40, 57–77. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. Emerson, R. M. F., R. I. & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago press. Fratocchi, L. D. M., Carmela; Barbieri, Paolo; Nassimbeni, Guido; Zanoni, Andrea. (2016). When manufacturing moves back: Concepts and questions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22, 56–59. Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48, 37–70. Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2011). Global value chain analysis: a primer. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness (CGGC), Duke University, North Carolina, USA, 33. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kaplinsky, R., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2001). Introduction: Globalisation, value chains and development. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. AldineTransaction. Gray, J. V. S., Katelyn; Esenduran, Gökçe; Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny. (2013). The reshoring phenomenon: What supply chain academics ought to know and should do. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 27–33. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317. Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00222-9 Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition. McGraw-Hill. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. ILO. (2025). World Employment and Social Outlook Update: May 2025. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2025-05/WESOUpdate_May2025_1.pdf Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2005). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance (Vol. 70). Harvard business review Boston, MA, USA. Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1. Kinkel, S. (2012). Trends in production relocation and backshoring activities: Changing patterns in the course of the global economic crisis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32, 696–720. Kogut, B. (1985). Designing Global Strategies: Comparative and Competitive Value-Added Chains. Sloan Management Review (pre-1986), 26(4), 15. Lee, H. L. (2000). Creating value through supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management Review, 4, 30–36. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43, 546–558. Lee, H. L., So, K. C., & Tang, C. S. (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science, 46, 626–643. McManus, J. (2023). Transaction cost economics and mutual legal uncertainty to build commitment. Journal of Organization Design, 12(3), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00149-7 Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, P. C. D., Environmental and Pollution Control Office No. 7 (Saraburi),. (2025). คู่มือ มาตรฐานคุณภาพสิ่งแวดล้อม. M. o. N. R. a. E. Pollution Control Department. https://www.viangtan-sao.go.th/viangtan_new/images/km/%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%9B/public_health/Environmental%20Manual.pdf Nations, U. (2024). UN Comtrade Database. https://comtradeplus.un.org/TradeFlow?Type=C&Frequency=A&Classification=HS&Period=2024,2023,2022,2021,2020,2019,2018,2017,2016,2015&Reporters=764&Partners=156,842&CommodityCodes=8471&Flows=X,M&Customs=C00&ModeOfTransport=0&secondPartner=0&AggregateBy=NONE&BreakdownMode=plus North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Palinkas, L. A. H., Sarah M.; Green, Carla A.; Wisdom, Jennifer P.; Duan, Naihua; Hoagwood, Kimberly. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of international business studies, 39(5), 920–936. Pfeffer, J. S., G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row. Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20, 124–143. Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143. Purdy, G. (2010). ISO 31000: 2009. Risk Management. John Wiley & Sons. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Holcomb, M. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 2117–2135. Sacchetti, S., & Tortia, E. (2024). A needs theory of governance: taking transaction cost theory back to humanistic economics and self-actualisation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 20, e13, Article e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137423000401 Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry. In Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (pp. xxxiv, 281–xxxiv, 281). Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed. ed.). Sage publications. Sheffi, Y. (2007). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press. Sheffi, Y., & Rice Jr, J. B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Managemen, 47, 41. Skinner, W. (1969). Manufacturing—missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 47, 136–145. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications. Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. Tierney, K. (2020). The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience. Stanford University Press. UNCTAD. (2023). UNCTAD Statistics: Productive Capacity Index (PCI). https://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/Pci.html Upton, D. M. (1995). Flexibility as process mobility: The management of plant capabilities for quick response manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management, 12(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(95)00004-C Van Der Vegt, G. S., Essens, P., Wahlström, M., & George, G. (2015). Managing risk and resilience. In (Vol. 58, pp. 971–980): Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 13–23. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA. กรมส่งเสริมการค้าระหว่างประเทศ. (2017). กฎหมาย / ระเบียบ และขั้นตอนการส่งออกโดยสรุป : เม็ดพลาสติกและผลิตภัณฑ์. Thailand: กรมส่งเสริมการค้าระหว่างประเทศ Retrieved from https://onestopservice.ditp.go.th/file/19.3.pdf กองบริหารงานวิจัยและประกันคุณภาพการศึกษา. (2017). พิมพ์เขียว Thailand 4.0 โมเดลขับเคลื่อนประเทศไทยสู่ความมั่งคั่ง มั่นคง และยั่งยืน. กองบริหารงานวิจัยและประกันคุณภาพการศึกษา. https://www.saerhung.go.th/datacenter/doc_download/a_310717_125838.pdf ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. (1998). Labour Protection Act. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2541/A/008/1.PDF 中國人大網. (2021). 中華人民共和國數據安全法. 全國人民代表大會常務委員會. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202106/t20210610_311888.html 中國工程院. (2015). 中國製造2025重點領域技術路線圖. 中國工程院. https://www.cae.cn/cae/html/files/2015-10/29/20151029105822561730637.pdf 中華人民共和國生態環境部. (2014). 中華人民共和國環境保護法. 中華人民共和國生態環境部. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/fl/201404/t20140425_271040.shtml 张莉. (2015). 解读《中国制造2025》. 今日中国:中文版, 000(005), 58–61. 陳添枝, & 顧瑩華. (2020). COVID-19對全球產業供應鏈的影響及臺灣的挑戰. 經濟前瞻(191), 28–34. 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
108932090資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108932090 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 宋皇志 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) 陳進東 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (作者) Chen, Chin-Tung en_US dc.creator (作者) 陳進東 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) Chen, Chin-Tung en_US dc.date (日期) 2026 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-三月-2026 11:27:02 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-三月-2026 11:27:02 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-三月-2026 11:27:02 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0108932090 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/161734 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 108932090 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究深入分析亞洲電子產業中小企業在全球供應鏈重構與產業轉型情境下的策略調適與經營實務。以泰國和中國的射出成形企業為典型案例，透過質性深度個案研究、文獻分析與實務訪談，本研究揭示，制度環境的成熟度與政策穩定性顯著影響企業的策略取向與治理模式。 核心發現是，企業在「生產交易成本」與「制度合規成本」之間進行權衡，進而形塑了迥異的策略選擇。中國企業傾向於制度化管理與長期技術積累，追求長遠競爭優勢；泰國企業則更側重多點佈局、彈性合作與供應鏈多元化，強調成本優化、快速回應以應對制度風險。儘管兩國企業皆追求成本控制、供應鏈韌性與市場就近策略，但在制度依賴度、治理機制及策略調整機制上呈現明顯差異。 研究建構了「制度—策略—韌性」三位一體理論模型，指出制度環境在中介與調節企業策略實施與風險防控中扮演關鍵角色，突顯其對供應鏈韌性建構的深遠影響。本研究不僅深化了跨國供應鏈管理中制度與交易成本理論的整合應用，更為提升企業韌性與政策制定提供了一系列策略與政策建議，涵蓋了制度穩定性、供應體系多元化、產業鏈在地化及風險預警等關鍵面向。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study delves into the strategic adaptation and operational practices of Asian electronics Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) in the context of global supply chain restructuring and industrial transformation. Using injection molding enterprises in Thailand and China as representative cases, and employing in-depth qualitative case studies, literature analysis, and expert interviews, this research reveals that the maturity of the institutional environment and policy stability significantly influence firms' strategic orientations and governance models. The core finding highlights that firms make a critical trade-off between "production transaction costs" and "institutional compliance costs," leading to distinct strategic choices. Chinese enterprises prioritize institutionalized management and long-term technological accumulation to achieve sustained competitive advantages, whereas Thai firms emphasize multi-point layouts, flexible collaborations, and supply chain diversification, focusing on cost optimization and rapid response to institutional risks. While both groups pursue cost control, supply chain resilience, and market proximity strategies, they exhibit notable differences in institutional dependency, governance mechanisms, and strategic adjustment approaches. The study develops a tripartite "Institution-Strategy-Resilience" model, which highlights how the institutional environment mediates and moderates strategy implementation and risk control, underscoring its profound impact on supply chain resilience. This research not only deepens the integrated application of Institutional Theory and Transaction Cost Theory in multinational supply chain management but also provides a series of strategic and policy recommendations for enhancing firm resilience and policy formulation, covering key areas such as institutional stability, supply system diversification, industrial chain localization, and risk early warning. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents 摘 要 2 目 次 5 表 次 9 圖 次 10 第一章 緒論 11 第一節 研究背景與動機 11 第二節 研究目的 15 第三節 研究問題 17 第四節 研究範圍與限制 18 一、研究範圍 18 二、研究限制 19 三、緩解措施 20 第二章 文獻探討 21 第一節 供應鏈移轉策略與治理 21 一、供應鏈移轉：定義、驅動因素與類型 21 二、供應鏈移轉策略 23 三、供應鏈治理機制 24 第二節 亞洲電子產業供應鏈重構背景 26 一、亞洲電子產業的現況與挑戰 26 二、供應鏈重構的原因與趨勢 27 三、供應鏈轉型對中小企業的影響 28 第三節 相關理論探討 29 一、制度環境與政策影響 29 二、交易成本理論與治理選擇 32 三、風險管理與韌性提升 32 第三章 研究方法 36 第一節 研究設計 36 一、研究取向：詮釋學 (Interpretivism) 36 二、研究策略：多重個案研究 (Multiple-Case Study) 37 三、資料蒐集方法：半結構式訪談、文件分析、以及參與式觀察 39 四、樣本選取：目的性抽樣與理論抽樣 40 五、資料分析方法：編碼、比較分析、以及模型建構 41 六、研究的嚴謹性：三角驗證與成員檢閱 43 第二節 資料來源與蒐集程序 44 一、一次資料 (Primary Data) 44 二、二次資料 (Secondary Data) 46 第三節 分析方法與三角驗證程序 47 一、資料分析流程 48 二、三角驗證 48 三、品質控制 (Quality Control) 49 第四節 研究步驟 50 一、準備階段（總計 0.5-1 個月） 50 二、資料蒐集階段（總計 2-3 個月） 51 三、資料分析與編碼階段（總計 1-1.5 個月） 51 四、結果驗證與報告撰寫階段（總計 1-1.5 個月） 52 第四章 個案實證：泰國與 中國射出成形企業的供應鏈移轉分析 54 第一節 泰國個案詳述與策略實踐 54 一、個案A（T01） 55 二、個案B（T02） 63 三、泰國市場雙重路徑：個案A與個案B治理與韌性策略 71 第二節 中國個案詳述與策略實踐 78 一、個案C (C01) 78 二、個案D (C02) 85 三、中企在泰雙重路徑：個案C與個案D治理與韌性策略 92 第三節 跨國比較：制度、策略與治理差異 101 一、策略層面比較 102 二、制度環境比較 107 三、治理機制比較 112 四、制度-成本互動模型 116 第五章 綜合討論與理論模型建構 121 第一節 制度—策略—韌性關聯模型 121 一、模型核心概念 121 二、制度環境對企業策略的影響 122 三、企業策略對韌性建構的影響 123 四、模型框架與動態關聯 124 五、制度、策略與韌性關聯模型綜合矩陣分析 125 第二節 主要發現 126 一、制度成熟度與穩定性是企業策略選擇的關鍵前提 127 二、制度與成本互動決定企業決策模式 128 三、治理機制的選擇受制度背景與策略目標的影響 128 四、韌性建構路徑具有多元性，並受策略選擇的塑造 129 五、共通的驅動因素與趨同的治理機制 129 第六章 結論、政策意涵與實務建議 131 第一節 結論 131 一、關於策略選擇與成本應對： 131 二、關於制度環境與治理權衡： 131 三、關於風險因素與應對機制： 131 四、關於供應鏈韌性建構： 132 五、關於政府政策與制度作用： 132 第二節 政策與實務建議 132 一、政策制定者的建議：打造有利於韌性建構的生態 132 二、企業經營者的建議：因應環境，構建核心競爭力 135 第三節 研究貢獻與未來研究方向 137 一、研究貢獻 137 二、未來研究方向 139 第四節 研究限制 141 一、研究範圍與案例選擇的局限性 141 二、資料來源與外部驗證的挑戰 142 三、質性研究方法的固有局限 142 四、時效性與動態性捕捉的挑戰 143 參考文獻 144 附錄（X01/X02/X03） 149 一、訪談大綱 （X01） 149 二、訪談表單（X02） 152 三、編碼分類 （X03） 157 zh_TW dc.format.extent 2825817 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108932090 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 亞洲電子產業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中小企業 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 供應鏈移轉 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 制度環境 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 策略調整 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 韌性管理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 供應鏈治理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 跨國比較 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中國 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 泰國 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 風險管理 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 制度理論 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 供應鏈韌性 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政策支持 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 治理機制 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 交易成本 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Asian Electronics Industry en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) SMEs en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Supply Chain Relocation, Institutional Environment en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Strategic Adaptation en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resilience Management, Supply Chain Governance en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Resilience Management, Supply Chain Governance en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cross-National Comparison en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) China en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Thailand en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Risk Management en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Institutional Theory en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Supply Chain Resilience en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Policy Support en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Governance Mechanisms en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Transaction Costs en_US dc.title (題名) 亞洲電子產業供應鏈移轉策略與運作—以泰國與中國射出成形中小企業為例 zh_TW dc.title (題名) STRATEGIES AND OPERATIONS OF SUPPLY CHAIN RELOCATION IN THE ASIAN ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY: A CASE STUDY OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED MOLDING ENTERPRISES IN THAILAND AND CHINA en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baldwin, R. (2013). Global supply chains: why they emerged, why they matter, and where they are going. In Global value chains in a changing world (pp. 13–59). WTO iLibrary. Baldwin, R., & Freeman, R. (2022). Risks and global supply chains: What we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 153–180. Barbieri, P., Di Stefano, C., Elia, S., Fratocchi, L., & Pensa, C. (2025). Supply backshoring as a strategy to reduce transaction costs in an era of global value chain reconfiguration. Journal of international management, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2025.101313 Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027 Chopra, S., & Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Managing Risk to Avoid Supply Chain Breakdowns. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46, 53–61. Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management. In Logistics & Supply Chain Management (5th ed. ed., pp. 2–3). Pearson UK. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275 Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Dicken, P. (2015). Global Shift: Mapping the Changing Contours of the World Economy (7th ed.). Guilford Press. DiMaggio, P. J. P., W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48. Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51, 11–27. Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S., & Chu, W. (1996). Does governance matter? Keiretsu alliances and asset specificity as sources of competitive advantage. Organization Science, 7, 649–666. Dyer, J. H., Cho, D. S., & Chu, W. (1998). Strategic supplier segmentation: the next "best practice" in supply chain management. California Management Review, 40, 57–77. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. Emerson, R. M. F., R. I. & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago press. Fratocchi, L. D. M., Carmela; Barbieri, Paolo; Nassimbeni, Guido; Zanoni, Andrea. (2016). When manufacturing moves back: Concepts and questions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22, 56–59. Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48, 37–70. Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2011). Global value chain analysis: a primer. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness (CGGC), Duke University, North Carolina, USA, 33. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kaplinsky, R., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2001). Introduction: Globalisation, value chains and development. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. AldineTransaction. Gray, J. V. S., Katelyn; Esenduran, Gökçe; Rungtusanatham, M. Johnny. (2013). The reshoring phenomenon: What supply chain academics ought to know and should do. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 49(2), 27–33. Gulati, R. (1998). Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, 19, 293–317. Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 87–105. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(98)00222-9 Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Edition. McGraw-Hill. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23. ILO. (2025). World Employment and Social Outlook Update: May 2025. https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/2025-05/WESOUpdate_May2025_1.pdf Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2005). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance (Vol. 70). Harvard business review Boston, MA, USA. Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1. Kinkel, S. (2012). Trends in production relocation and backshoring activities: Changing patterns in the course of the global economic crisis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32, 696–720. Kogut, B. (1985). Designing Global Strategies: Comparative and Competitive Value-Added Chains. Sloan Management Review (pre-1986), 26(4), 15. Lee, H. L. (2000). Creating value through supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management Review, 4, 30–36. Lee, H. L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). Information distortion in a supply chain: the bullwhip effect. Management Science, 43, 546–558. Lee, H. L., So, K. C., & Tang, C. S. (2000). The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Science, 46, 626–643. McManus, J. (2023). Transaction cost economics and mutual legal uncertainty to build commitment. Journal of Organization Design, 12(3), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41469-023-00149-7 Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, P. C. D., Environmental and Pollution Control Office No. 7 (Saraburi),. (2025). คู่มือ มาตรฐานคุณภาพสิ่งแวดล้อม. M. o. N. R. a. E. Pollution Control Department. https://www.viangtan-sao.go.th/viangtan_new/images/km/%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%9B/public_health/Environmental%20Manual.pdf Nations, U. (2024). UN Comtrade Database. https://comtradeplus.un.org/TradeFlow?Type=C&Frequency=A&Classification=HS&Period=2024,2023,2022,2021,2020,2019,2018,2017,2016,2015&Reporters=764&Partners=156,842&CommodityCodes=8471&Flows=X,M&Customs=C00&ModeOfTransport=0&secondPartner=0&AggregateBy=NONE&BreakdownMode=plus North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Palinkas, L. A. H., Sarah M.; Green, Carla A.; Wisdom, Jennifer P.; Duan, Naihua; Hoagwood, Kimberly. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. Peng, M. W., Wang, D. Y., & Jiang, Y. (2008). An institution-based view of international business strategy: A focus on emerging economies. Journal of international business studies, 39(5), 920–936. Pfeffer, J. S., G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper & Row. Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20, 124–143. Ponomarov, S. Y., & Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20(1), 124–143. Purdy, G. (2010). ISO 31000: 2009. Risk Management. John Wiley & Sons. Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Holcomb, M. (2019). Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 57, 2117–2135. Sacchetti, S., & Tortia, E. (2024). A needs theory of governance: taking transaction cost theory back to humanistic economics and self-actualisation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 20, e13, Article e13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137423000401 Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry. In Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (pp. xxxiv, 281–xxxiv, 281). Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed. ed.). Sage publications. Sheffi, Y. (2007). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press. Sheffi, Y., & Rice Jr, J. B. (2005). A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise. MIT Sloan Managemen, 47, 41. Skinner, W. (1969). Manufacturing—missing link in corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review, 47, 136–145. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant Observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Sage Publications. Tang, C. S. (2006). Perspectives in supply chain risk management. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451–488. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. Tierney, K. (2020). The social roots of risk: Producing disasters, promoting resilience. Stanford University Press. UNCTAD. (2023). UNCTAD Statistics: Productive Capacity Index (PCI). https://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/Pci.html Upton, D. M. (1995). Flexibility as process mobility: The management of plant capabilities for quick response manufacturing. Journal of Operations Management, 12(3), 205–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(95)00004-C Van Der Vegt, G. S., Essens, P., Wahlström, M., & George, G. (2015). Managing risk and resilience. In (Vol. 58, pp. 971–980): Academy of Management Briarcliff Manor, NY. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12, 13–23. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA. กรมส่งเสริมการค้าระหว่างประเทศ. (2017). กฎหมาย / ระเบียบ และขั้นตอนการส่งออกโดยสรุป : เม็ดพลาสติกและผลิตภัณฑ์. Thailand: กรมส่งเสริมการค้าระหว่างประเทศ Retrieved from https://onestopservice.ditp.go.th/file/19.3.pdf กองบริหารงานวิจัยและประกันคุณภาพการศึกษา. (2017). พิมพ์เขียว Thailand 4.0 โมเดลขับเคลื่อนประเทศไทยสู่ความมั่งคั่ง มั่นคง และยั่งยืน. กองบริหารงานวิจัยและประกันคุณภาพการศึกษา. https://www.saerhung.go.th/datacenter/doc_download/a_310717_125838.pdf ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. (1998). Labour Protection Act. ราชกิจจานุเบกษา. https://www.ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/DATA/PDF/2541/A/008/1.PDF 中國人大網. (2021). 中華人民共和國數據安全法. 全國人民代表大會常務委員會. http://www.npc.gov.cn/npc/c2/c30834/202106/t20210610_311888.html 中國工程院. (2015). 中國製造2025重點領域技術路線圖. 中國工程院. https://www.cae.cn/cae/html/files/2015-10/29/20151029105822561730637.pdf 中華人民共和國生態環境部. (2014). 中華人民共和國環境保護法. 中華人民共和國生態環境部. https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/fl/201404/t20140425_271040.shtml 张莉. (2015). 解读《中国制造2025》. 今日中国:中文版, 000(005), 58–61. 陳添枝, & 顧瑩華. (2020). COVID-19對全球產業供應鏈的影響及臺灣的挑戰. 經濟前瞻(191), 28–34. zh_TW
