Publications-學位論文
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 金門人在金門與台灣的國族認同比較
A Comparison of the National Identity of Kinmenese in Kinmen and Taiwan作者 麥繼傑
McGee, Jacob貢獻者 劉名峰<br>林超琦
Liu, Ming-Feng<br>Lin, Chao-Chi
麥繼傑
Jacob McGee關鍵詞 金門
烈嶼
臺灣
中國
中華
認同
Kinmen
Quemoy
Taiwan
China
Republic of China
Identity日期 2026 上傳時間 2-Mar-2026 12:04:51 (UTC+8) 摘要 本論文探討金門人的國族認同，旨在比較居住在金門與旅居臺灣的金門人之間的國族認同差異。自 2025 年 4 月至 10 月期間，我對三十一位在金門或來自金門的人進行了訪談（受訪者多以滾雪球方式取得）。我將受訪者分為兩組：第一組為目前居住在金門的人，第二組為居住在臺北及其周邊地區的金門人。這些訪談的主要目的在於取得質性資料。受訪者被問及一系列問題，大致相同，但會依不同受訪者略作調整。本論文不僅紀錄兩組受訪者的意見，也探討兩組之間是否存在意見差異，以及差異為何。所得資料經分析後，並與既有的身份認同研究文獻——包括一般身份認同、臺灣身份認同及金門身份認同——進行比較。研究結果顯示，兩組之間的差異並不顯著。然而，居住在臺灣的金門受訪者在中國認同以及泛藍政治支持度方面，略高於居住在金門的受訪者。本研究的整體發現指出，金門的身份認同相當複雜，兩組受訪者中許多人同時持有看似矛盾的觀點。受訪者的國族認同受歷史、政治與地理等多重因素所形塑。
This paper is about national identity among Kinmenese. It aims to examine the differences between national identity in Kinmen and national identity among Kinmenese living in Taiwan. From April to October 2025, I conducted thirty-one interviews with people in or from Kinmen (largely gained by snowballing). I divided them into two groups. The first group consisted of people in Kinmen and the second group consisted of Kinmenese people in and around Taipei. The goal of these interviews was mainly to get qualitative data from the interviewees. They were asked a series of questions that were mostly the same but were slightly different for different interviewees. This paper aims not only to document the opinions of these two groups, but also to examine what differences there are in opinion between the two groups (if there are any). The data gained from the interviews has been analyzed and compared to the already existing body of literature on identity in general as well as identity in Taiwan and in Kinmen. When the data was examined, the differences found between the two groups were not great. However, the interviewees in Taiwan were found to have a slightly higher identification with China as well as support for pan-Blue politics than the Kinmenese in Kinmen. The general findings were that identity in Kinmen is complicated and many Kinmenese in both groups hold to seemingly contradictory opinions. The interviewees’ national identities were formed by a mix of historical, political, and geographical factors.參考文獻 Adams, G. R. (1985). Identity and political socialization. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1985(30), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219853006 Bodeen, C., & Leung, K. (2025, July 27). Voters in Taiwan reject bid to oust China-friendly lawmakers in closely watched poll. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/taiwan-recall-oust-lawmakers-kmt-dpp-china-e81a7dc977ff5f0d1924c930fce6ac06? Central Election Commission (n.d.). Election Database. Retrieved September 26, 2025, from https://db.cec.gov.tw/Visual/President?dataLevel=N&legisId=00&typeId=ELC&subjectId=P0&themeId=4d83db17c1707e3defae5dc4d4e9c800 Chang, B.-y. (2004). From Taiwanisation to De-sinification: Culture construction in Taiwan since the 1990s. China Perspectives, 56, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.438 Cheng, S.-F. (2022). Analyzing Taiwanese/Chinese identity: 2000–2021. Electoral Studies, 29(2), 73–114. https://doi.org/10.6612/tjes.202211_29(2).0003 CNA (2023, October 26). MAC poll shows 85% of Taiwanese oppose “One Country, Two Systems”. Retrieved October 29, 2025, from https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202310260361.aspx CNA (2025, December 9). In an interview with foreign media, Hou You-yi says Taiwan’s future should be decided by its 23 million people. Retrieved October 29, 2025, from https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202312090229.aspx Côté, J. E. (1996). Sociological Perspectives on Identity Formation: The Culture–Identity Link and Identity Capital. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1996.0040 Election Study Center, National Chengchi University (2025, July 7). Trends in Taiwanese Public Identification as Taiwanese/Chinese (June 1992 – June 2025). Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7804&id=6960 (2026). Trends in Taiwanese Public Identification as Taiwanese/Chinese (June 1992 – June 2025) [Photograph]. Election Study Center, National Chengchi University. https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/upload/44/doc/6960/People202506.png Election Study Center, National Chengchi University (2025, July 7). Taiwan Independence vs. Unification with the Mainland(1994/12~2025/06). Retrieved July 7, 2025, from https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7801&id=6963 (2025). Changes in the Unification - Independence Stances of Taiwanese as Tracked in Surveys by Election Study Center, NCCU (1994~2025.06) [Photograph]. Election Study Center, National Chengchi University. https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/upload/44/doc/6963/Tondu202506.png Global Taiwan Institution (2024, August 7). Youth TPP Support Explained: A Shift from China to Domestic Economic Concerns. Globaltaiwan.org. Retrieved October 28, 2025, from https://globaltaiwan.org/2024/08/youth-tpp-support-explained/ Green, E. (2018). Five Turtles in a Flask: For Taiwan’s Outer Islands, an Uncertain Future Holds a Certain Fate (Master’s thesis). University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Günay, C., Witjes, N., Editors, (2017). Border Politics: Defining Spaces of Governance and Forms of Transgressions. Springer, pp. 51-62, 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46855-6 Jacobs, J.B. (2005). “Taiwanization” in Taiwan’s Politics. In: Makeham, J., Hsiau, Ac. (eds) Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, p. 18. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980618_2 Hardwick, S. W., Marcus, R., & Isaak, M. (2010). Education and national identity in a comparative context. National Identities, 12(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608941003727932 Hughes, C. (1997). Taiwan and Chinese nationalism: National Identity and Status in International Society. Routledge, 10. Jiang, B. (2020). The Possibility of "Kinmen Studies": A Local Social Research Approach in Global Geography. Historical Taiwan: National Museum of Taiwan History Journal, 19, 7-51. Kamusella, T. (2017). BETWEEN CIVIC AND ETHNIC NATIONALISM. Проблеми Всесвітньої Історії, 2(4), 34-46. Kwan, J. P. (n.d.). The Rise of Civic Nationalism: Shifting Identities in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal, 2(2), 941–973. Lams, L., & Liao, X. L. W. (2011). Tracing “Taiwanization” Processes in Taiwanese Presidential Statements in Times of Cross-Strait Rapprochement. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 40(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261104000103 Li, Cí-róng. (2010). A Study of National Identity and Regional Identity Among Residents of the Kinmen Area. Taoyuan, Taiwan: In-Service Master’s Program, Department of Public Affairs, Ming Chuan University. (Master’s thesis). Liu, M-F. (2016). Civilizing Process and the Geopolitics of Morality: The Case of Kinmen and its Implication for the Reflection on Western Modernity. International Cultural Studies, 12(2), 67-86. Liu, M-F. (2021). Communitas of Kinmen Identity within "Republic of China-Taiwan": The Meaning of Social Responsibility of Kinmen’s Museums from the View of Fourthspace. Taiwan: A Quarterly of Social Research, 120, 135-183. Liu, M-F. (2017). Democratic Transition and the Change of Emotional Mode for the Land: The Role of BOT in the County Magistrate Election of Kinmen in 2014. Social Science Journal, 11(2), 117-172. Liu, M-F. (2019). The Cultural Logic of Emotion Constructivism in International Politics: The Diplomatic Rhetoric of "Hurting the Feelings of the Chinese people". Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, 15(3), 171-211. Liu, M-F. (2021). The Culturalization of the Battlefield as a Representation of the Formation of Public Spheres during the Democratic Transition Process: A Comparative Study of the Political Societies of Kinmen and Matsu. Taiwan Public Culture Journal Merritt, M. (2000). A Geopolitics of Identity: Drawing the line between Russia and Estonia. Nationalities Papers, 28(2), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/713687468 Paasi, A. (2011). The Region, Identity, and Power. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.011 Reeskens, T., & Hooghe, M. (2010). Beyond the civic–ethnic dichotomy: Investigating the structure of citizenship concepts across thirty-three countries. Nations and Nationalism, 16(4), 579-595. (2015). Enclosing resources on the islands of Kinmen and Xiamen: From war blockade to financializing natural heritage - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. [Photograph]. Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-showing-position-of-Kinmen-Island-left-of-center-in-relation-to-the-Mainland-north_fig7_272372811 Roberts, K. (2017). Understanding Putin: The Politics of Identity and Geopolitics in Russian Foreign Policy Discourse. International Journal, 72(1), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702017692609 Szonyi, M. (2008). Cold War Island: Quemoy on the Front Line (pp. 221-222). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Theys, S. (2018, February 23). Introducing constructivism in international relations theory. E-International Relations. 37. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/23/introducing-constructivism-in-international-relations-theory/ Wan, T. A. (2022). Islands, Geopolitics and Language Ideologies: Sociolinguistic Differentiation between Taiwanese and Kinmenese Hokkien. Language & Communication, 83, 36–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.01.001 Wang, T. Y. (2005). Taiwan’s National Identity and Relations with China: A longitudinal analysis of survey data (Discussion Paper). Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin. Wang, T. Y., Huang, C. (2023). The Chinese Threat and Changes of identity in Taiwan. Asian Survey, 64(3), 428–451. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2023.2108868 Wei, J. F. (2006). An Examination of Cultural Identity of Residents in Kinmen Island (Quemoy). Intercultural Communication Studies, 15(1), 132–142. Wu, P. H. (2022). A Preliminary Study on the Identity of Kinmen Citizens: A survey in 2022 (Master’s thesis). National Taiwan University, 11, 16-18, 52-55, 79. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202203340 Yang, Z. (2016). Explaining national identity shift in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(99), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1104866 描述 碩士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS)
112926014資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112926014 資料類型 thesis dc.contributor.advisor 劉名峰<br>林超琦 zh_TW dc.contributor.advisor Liu, Ming-Feng<br>Lin, Chao-Chi en_US dc.contributor.author (Authors) 麥繼傑 zh_TW dc.contributor.author (Authors) Jacob McGee en_US dc.creator (作者) 麥繼傑 zh_TW dc.creator (作者) McGee, Jacob en_US dc.date (日期) 2026 en_US dc.date.accessioned 2-Mar-2026 12:04:51 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 2-Mar-2026 12:04:51 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Mar-2026 12:04:51 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0112926014 en_US dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/161838 - dc.description (描述) 碩士 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學 zh_TW dc.description (描述) 亞太研究英語碩士學位學程(IMAS) zh_TW dc.description (描述) 112926014 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文探討金門人的國族認同，旨在比較居住在金門與旅居臺灣的金門人之間的國族認同差異。自 2025 年 4 月至 10 月期間，我對三十一位在金門或來自金門的人進行了訪談（受訪者多以滾雪球方式取得）。我將受訪者分為兩組：第一組為目前居住在金門的人，第二組為居住在臺北及其周邊地區的金門人。這些訪談的主要目的在於取得質性資料。受訪者被問及一系列問題，大致相同，但會依不同受訪者略作調整。本論文不僅紀錄兩組受訪者的意見，也探討兩組之間是否存在意見差異，以及差異為何。所得資料經分析後，並與既有的身份認同研究文獻——包括一般身份認同、臺灣身份認同及金門身份認同——進行比較。研究結果顯示，兩組之間的差異並不顯著。然而，居住在臺灣的金門受訪者在中國認同以及泛藍政治支持度方面，略高於居住在金門的受訪者。本研究的整體發現指出，金門的身份認同相當複雜，兩組受訪者中許多人同時持有看似矛盾的觀點。受訪者的國族認同受歷史、政治與地理等多重因素所形塑。 zh_TW dc.description.abstract (摘要) This paper is about national identity among Kinmenese. It aims to examine the differences between national identity in Kinmen and national identity among Kinmenese living in Taiwan. From April to October 2025, I conducted thirty-one interviews with people in or from Kinmen (largely gained by snowballing). I divided them into two groups. The first group consisted of people in Kinmen and the second group consisted of Kinmenese people in and around Taipei. The goal of these interviews was mainly to get qualitative data from the interviewees. They were asked a series of questions that were mostly the same but were slightly different for different interviewees. This paper aims not only to document the opinions of these two groups, but also to examine what differences there are in opinion between the two groups (if there are any). The data gained from the interviews has been analyzed and compared to the already existing body of literature on identity in general as well as identity in Taiwan and in Kinmen. When the data was examined, the differences found between the two groups were not great. However, the interviewees in Taiwan were found to have a slightly higher identification with China as well as support for pan-Blue politics than the Kinmenese in Kinmen. The general findings were that identity in Kinmen is complicated and many Kinmenese in both groups hold to seemingly contradictory opinions. The interviewees’ national identities were formed by a mix of historical, political, and geographical factors. en_US dc.description.tableofcontents Chapter 1: The Island of Kinmen and its Importance 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Problematique 2 1.3 Overview of Kinmen 2 1.4 Definitions 6 Chapter 2: Literature Review and Statistics 9 2.1 Literature on Identity and Identity Formation 9 2.2 Statistics on National Identity and Political Opinions of Taiwanese 12 2.3 Literature on Identity in Taiwan 16 2.4 Literature on Identity in Kinmen 18 2.5 Summary of Literature on Identity 24 Chapter 3: Research Methods and Theoretical Framework 27 3.1 Introduction 27 3.2 The Choice of Interviewees 27 3.3 The Choice of Questions for the Interviews 28 3.4 Examples of Specific Questions Asked 31 3.5 Explanation of the Questions 31 3.6 Expectations 34 Chapter 4: Results of the Interviews for Group One 35 4.1 Introduction 35 4.2 Kinmen Residents’ Self-Identification when asked 39 4.3 The Meanings of 中 國 (Zhongguo), 中 華 (Zhonghua), and 台 灣 (Taiwan) According to residents of Kinmen 40 4.4 One Country, Two Systems and the Proposed Bridge Linking Kinmen and Xiamen 42 4.5 Analysis of Opinions on Unification 43 4.6 Summary of Group 1 45 Chapter 5: Group Two (Kinmenese Living in Taipei, New Taipei, Keelung, and Taoyuan) 47 5.1 Introduction 47 5.2 Taiwanization? 49 5.3 Opinions on Political Issues 50 5.4 Taiwan, Kinmen, and Mainland China 51 5.5 Summary of Group 2 53 Chapter 6: Analysis of the Opinions of Kinmenese Interviewees in Groups 1 and 2 55 6.1 Introduction 55 6.2 Tables Showing the Opinions of Kinmenese Interviewees in Groups 1 and 2 55 6.3 How did Kinmenese Interviewees Define the Words 中國, 中華, and 台灣? 59 6.4 Analysis 61 Chapter 7: Conclusion 65 7.1 The Relation of the Interviews and their Results to Current Events in Taiwan 65 7.2 Final Words on the Interviews 66 7.3 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 69 Bibliography 71 zh_TW dc.format.extent 1624962 bytes - dc.format.mimetype application/pdf - dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112926014 en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) 金門 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 烈嶼 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 臺灣 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中國 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中華 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) 認同 zh_TW dc.subject (關鍵詞) Kinmen en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Quemoy en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Taiwan en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) China en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Republic of China en_US dc.subject (關鍵詞) Identity en_US dc.title (題名) 金門人在金門與台灣的國族認同比較 zh_TW dc.title (題名) A Comparison of the National Identity of Kinmenese in Kinmen and Taiwan en_US dc.type (資料類型) thesis en_US dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adams, G. R. (1985). Identity and political socialization. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1985(30), 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219853006 Bodeen, C., & Leung, K. (2025, July 27). Voters in Taiwan reject bid to oust China-friendly lawmakers in closely watched poll. Associated Press. https://apnews.com/article/taiwan-recall-oust-lawmakers-kmt-dpp-china-e81a7dc977ff5f0d1924c930fce6ac06? Central Election Commission (n.d.). Election Database. Retrieved September 26, 2025, from https://db.cec.gov.tw/Visual/President?dataLevel=N&legisId=00&typeId=ELC&subjectId=P0&themeId=4d83db17c1707e3defae5dc4d4e9c800 Chang, B.-y. (2004). From Taiwanisation to De-sinification: Culture construction in Taiwan since the 1990s. China Perspectives, 56, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.438 Cheng, S.-F. (2022). Analyzing Taiwanese/Chinese identity: 2000–2021. Electoral Studies, 29(2), 73–114. https://doi.org/10.6612/tjes.202211_29(2).0003 CNA (2023, October 26). MAC poll shows 85% of Taiwanese oppose “One Country, Two Systems”. Retrieved October 29, 2025, from https://www.cna.com.tw/news/acn/202310260361.aspx CNA (2025, December 9). In an interview with foreign media, Hou You-yi says Taiwan’s future should be decided by its 23 million people. Retrieved October 29, 2025, from https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aipl/202312090229.aspx Côté, J. E. (1996). Sociological Perspectives on Identity Formation: The Culture–Identity Link and Identity Capital. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.1996.0040 Election Study Center, National Chengchi University (2025, July 7). Trends in Taiwanese Public Identification as Taiwanese/Chinese (June 1992 – June 2025). Retrieved September 27, 2025, from https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7804&id=6960 (2026). Trends in Taiwanese Public Identification as Taiwanese/Chinese (June 1992 – June 2025) [Photograph]. Election Study Center, National Chengchi University. https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/upload/44/doc/6960/People202506.png Election Study Center, National Chengchi University (2025, July 7). Taiwan Independence vs. Unification with the Mainland(1994/12~2025/06). Retrieved July 7, 2025, from https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/PageDoc/Detail?fid=7801&id=6963 (2025). Changes in the Unification - Independence Stances of Taiwanese as Tracked in Surveys by Election Study Center, NCCU (1994~2025.06) [Photograph]. Election Study Center, National Chengchi University. https://esc.nccu.edu.tw/upload/44/doc/6963/Tondu202506.png Global Taiwan Institution (2024, August 7). Youth TPP Support Explained: A Shift from China to Domestic Economic Concerns. Globaltaiwan.org. Retrieved October 28, 2025, from https://globaltaiwan.org/2024/08/youth-tpp-support-explained/ Green, E. (2018). Five Turtles in a Flask: For Taiwan’s Outer Islands, an Uncertain Future Holds a Certain Fate (Master’s thesis). University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Günay, C., Witjes, N., Editors, (2017). Border Politics: Defining Spaces of Governance and Forms of Transgressions. Springer, pp. 51-62, 145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46855-6 Jacobs, J.B. (2005). “Taiwanization” in Taiwan’s Politics. In: Makeham, J., Hsiau, Ac. (eds) Cultural, Ethnic, and Political Nationalism in Contemporary Taiwan. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, p. 18. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403980618_2 Hardwick, S. W., Marcus, R., & Isaak, M. (2010). Education and national identity in a comparative context. National Identities, 12(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14608941003727932 Hughes, C. (1997). Taiwan and Chinese nationalism: National Identity and Status in International Society. Routledge, 10. Jiang, B. (2020). The Possibility of "Kinmen Studies": A Local Social Research Approach in Global Geography. Historical Taiwan: National Museum of Taiwan History Journal, 19, 7-51. Kamusella, T. (2017). BETWEEN CIVIC AND ETHNIC NATIONALISM. Проблеми Всесвітньої Історії, 2(4), 34-46. Kwan, J. P. (n.d.). The Rise of Civic Nationalism: Shifting Identities in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations: An International Journal, 2(2), 941–973. Lams, L., & Liao, X. L. W. (2011). Tracing “Taiwanization” Processes in Taiwanese Presidential Statements in Times of Cross-Strait Rapprochement. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 40(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810261104000103 Li, Cí-róng. (2010). A Study of National Identity and Regional Identity Among Residents of the Kinmen Area. Taoyuan, Taiwan: In-Service Master’s Program, Department of Public Affairs, Ming Chuan University. (Master’s thesis). Liu, M-F. (2016). Civilizing Process and the Geopolitics of Morality: The Case of Kinmen and its Implication for the Reflection on Western Modernity. International Cultural Studies, 12(2), 67-86. Liu, M-F. (2021). Communitas of Kinmen Identity within "Republic of China-Taiwan": The Meaning of Social Responsibility of Kinmen’s Museums from the View of Fourthspace. Taiwan: A Quarterly of Social Research, 120, 135-183. Liu, M-F. (2017). Democratic Transition and the Change of Emotional Mode for the Land: The Role of BOT in the County Magistrate Election of Kinmen in 2014. Social Science Journal, 11(2), 117-172. Liu, M-F. (2019). The Cultural Logic of Emotion Constructivism in International Politics: The Diplomatic Rhetoric of "Hurting the Feelings of the Chinese people". Taiwan International Studies Quarterly, 15(3), 171-211. Liu, M-F. (2021). The Culturalization of the Battlefield as a Representation of the Formation of Public Spheres during the Democratic Transition Process: A Comparative Study of the Political Societies of Kinmen and Matsu. Taiwan Public Culture Journal Merritt, M. (2000). A Geopolitics of Identity: Drawing the line between Russia and Estonia. Nationalities Papers, 28(2), 243-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/713687468 Paasi, A. (2011). The Region, Identity, and Power. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 14, 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.011 Reeskens, T., & Hooghe, M. (2010). Beyond the civic–ethnic dichotomy: Investigating the structure of citizenship concepts across thirty-three countries. Nations and Nationalism, 16(4), 579-595. (2015). Enclosing resources on the islands of Kinmen and Xiamen: From war blockade to financializing natural heritage - Scientific Figure on ResearchGate. [Photograph]. Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Map-showing-position-of-Kinmen-Island-left-of-center-in-relation-to-the-Mainland-north_fig7_272372811 Roberts, K. (2017). Understanding Putin: The Politics of Identity and Geopolitics in Russian Foreign Policy Discourse. International Journal, 72(1), 28–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020702017692609 Szonyi, M. (2008). Cold War Island: Quemoy on the Front Line (pp. 221-222). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Theys, S. (2018, February 23). Introducing constructivism in international relations theory. E-International Relations. 37. https://www.e-ir.info/2018/02/23/introducing-constructivism-in-international-relations-theory/ Wan, T. A. (2022). Islands, Geopolitics and Language Ideologies: Sociolinguistic Differentiation between Taiwanese and Kinmenese Hokkien. Language & Communication, 83, 36–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.langcom.2022.01.001 Wang, T. Y. (2005). Taiwan’s National Identity and Relations with China: A longitudinal analysis of survey data (Discussion Paper). Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP), Berlin. Wang, T. Y., Huang, C. (2023). The Chinese Threat and Changes of identity in Taiwan. Asian Survey, 64(3), 428–451. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2023.2108868 Wei, J. F. (2006). An Examination of Cultural Identity of Residents in Kinmen Island (Quemoy). Intercultural Communication Studies, 15(1), 132–142. Wu, P. H. (2022). A Preliminary Study on the Identity of Kinmen Citizens: A survey in 2022 (Master’s thesis). National Taiwan University, 11, 16-18, 52-55, 79. https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202203340 Yang, Z. (2016). Explaining national identity shift in Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 25(99), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1104866 zh_TW
