Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 我國碳定價制度研究: 以總量管制與排放交易為核心
A study on the carbon pricing system in Taiwan: Focusing on Cap-and-Trade Scheme
作者 石蕙語
Shih, Huei-Yu
貢獻者 許崇源
石蕙語
Shih, Huei-Yu
關鍵詞 碳定價
總量管制與排放交易
氣候變遷因應法
永續資訊揭露
Carbon pricing
Cap-and-Trade Scheme
Climate Change Response Act
Sustainability information disclosure
日期 2026
上傳時間 2-Mar-2026 12:39:53 (UTC+8)
摘要   為因應全球氣候變遷挑戰及實現2050年淨零排放目標,我國透過《氣候變遷因應法》建構氣候治理之法制基礎,涵蓋碳費及總量管制與排放交易等碳定價機制。在執行策略上,我國採循序漸進之方式,短期內優先實施碳費,中長期則研議實施總量管制與排放交易制度。依據環境部規劃,將於2026年下半年啟動總量管制與排放交易制度之試行,並預計於2027年形成兩項制度併行之雙軌制碳定價架構。   相較於先行推動的碳費,總量管制與排放交易之實施面臨制度設計及制度相容性之雙重挑戰。前者涉及如何依據我國排放現況、減量目標及行政量能,合理訂定排放上限、配額分配方式及抵換機制,以兼顧減碳成效與市場流動性;後者則須考量新制如何與現行碳費、碳信用機制及溫室氣體盤查登錄制度有效整合。   本文首先探討碳定價的背景、意涵、類別及法律性質,建構碳定價的理論基礎。其次,分析並比較發展成熟之歐盟及韓國總量管制與排放交易制度,作為我國制度設計的借鏡。參酌國際經驗並考量我國現行制度,本文依據《排放交易實務:設計與實施手冊》(Emissions Trading In Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation)第二版之架構,提出我國總量管制與排放交易之制度設計建議。此外,本文亦探討我國現行碳定價制度之會計處理,以及碳定價資訊於永續揭露準則S1號及S2號(IFRS S1、S2)下之揭露議題,釐清相關規範之適用,並提供企業財務報導與資訊揭露之實務參考。
In response to the challenges of global climate change and the goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, Taiwan has established a legal foundation for climate governance through the “Climate Change Response Act”, which encompasses carbon pricing mechanisms such as carbon fee and cap-and-trade Scheme. Regarding the implementation strategy, Taiwan adopts a gradual approach: prioritizing the carbon fee in the short term, while evaluating the introduction of cap-and-trade scheme in the medium-to-long term. According to the Ministry of Environment, a pilot cap-and-trade scheme will launch in the second half of 2026, with the aim of establishing a dual-track carbon pricing framework where both systems operate in parallel by 2027. Compared to the carbon fee implemented earlier, the implementation of cap-and-trade faces dual challenges of system design and system compatibility. The former involves how to reasonably determine the emission cap, allowance allocation methods, and offset mechanisms based on Taiwan's emission status, reduction targets, and administrative capacity, in order to balance reduction effectiveness and market liquidity. The latter requires policymakers to consider how the new system can be effectively integrated with the existing carbon fee, carbon credit mechanisms, and the greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory and registration system. This study first explores the background, implications, categories, and legal nature of carbon pricing to construct a theoretical foundation. Secondly, it analyzes and compares the mature Emissions Trading System (ETS) of the EU and South Korea to serve as a reference for ETS design. Drawing on international experience and considering Taiwan's existing systems, this study proposes recommendations for the design of Taiwan's cap-and-trade scheme based on the framework of Emissions Trading In Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation (2nd Edition). Furthermore, this study explores the accounting treatment of Taiwan's current carbon pricing system and disclosure issues regarding carbon pricing information under IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards S1 and S2 (IFRS S1, S2), clarifying the application of relevant regulations and providing practical references for corporate financial reporting and information disclosure.
參考文獻 中華民國行政院主計總處,2023,111年綠色國民所得帳編製報告(環境與經濟帳)。 中華民國行政院國家永續發展委員會,2009,永續發展政策綱領。 中華民國行政院國家發展委員會(國發會),2022,臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明。 中華民國環境部,2024,溫室氣體排放量盤查作業指引113年版。 中華民國環境部氣候變遷署,2025,2025 年中華民國國家溫室氣體排放清冊報告。 中國鋼鐵股份有限公司,2025。2024年永續報告書。 邱晨,2025,氣候變遷因應下之環境公課,中正財經法學,第30期:65-125。 柯格鐘,2008,特別公課之概念及爭議-以釋字第四二六號解釋所討論之空氣污染防制費為例,月旦法學雜誌,第163期:194-215。 施文真,2012,能源稅與碳稅之邊境稅調整措施--以GATT/WTO之合致性為主要討論對象,貿易政策論叢,第17期:157-220。 施文真,2015,排放權交易制度於臺灣之推動現況以及可能引發之法律爭議,月旦法學雜誌,第239期:52-79。 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會,2023,企業持有碳權資產相關會計處理之指引。 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會,2025,IFRS S2「氣候相關揭露」揭露範例-鋼鐵製造商(EM-IS)。 張軒瑜、劉哲良與蔡玲儀,2025,排碳不再無價—臺灣碳費制度概述,會計研究發展月刊,第471期:66-71。 陳衍任,2023,CO2 排放權的制度省思-德國法制的觀察與反思,月旦律評,第18期:10。 陳清秀,2019,稅法總論,臺北市:元照出版有限公司。 陳敏,2019,稅法總論,作者自版。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際財務報導準則第13號「公允價值衡量」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際會計準則第8號「會計政策、會計估計值變動及錯誤」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際會計準則第20號「政府補助之會計及政府輔助之揭露」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025國際會計準則第36號「資產減損」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025國際會計準則第37號「負債準備、或有負債及或有資產」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際會計準則第38號「無形資產」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際財務報導解釋第21號「公課」(中文版)。 葉至誠與葉立誠,2011,研究方法與論文寫作,臺北市 : 商鼎文化出版社。 葉俊榮,1990,論環境政策上的經濟誘因:理論依據,國立臺灣大學法學論叢,第20卷第1期:87-111。 蔡茂寅,2009,財政法:第二講 財政收入總論(下),月旦法學教室,第87期:57-66。 廖欽福,2018,能源稅的美麗新世界-環境能源公課之課徵及其憲法界限,華岡法粹,第64期:113-181。 趙家緯與謝雯凱,2007,台灣氣候變遷政策的回顧與展望,全球變遷通訊雜誌,第56期:16-23。 劉哲良,2022,碳環境稅費的設計探討,經濟前瞻,第199期:119-125。 蕭代基,2009,綠色稅制改革之研究(行政院賦稅改革委員會研究報告)。行政院賦稅改革委員會。 Asian Development Bank. 2018. The Korea emissions trading scheme: Challenges and emerging opportunities. Barckow, A., and Faber, E. 2023. Connectivity—what is it and what does it deliver? IFRS Foundation. Available at: https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2023/03/connectivity-what-is-it-and-what-does-it-deliver/. Accessed: January 10, 2026. Barde, J. P. 1994. Economic instruments in environmental policy: lessons from the OECD experience and their relevance to developing economies. Working Paper, OECD Development Centre. Burke, J., and Taschini, L. 2020. Carbon pricing options for Taiwan. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. European Parliament and Council. 2004. Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 275: 32-46. European Parliament and Council. 2009. Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community. Official Journal of the European Union L 8: 3. European Commission. 2011. 2011/278/EU: Commission Decision of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union L 130: 1–45. European Parliament and Council. 2014. Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments (MiFID II). Official Journal of the European Union L 173: 349. European Securities and Markets Authority. 2024. ESMA market report on EU carbon markets 2024. Finland. 1995. Finland's National Report under the United Nation's Framework Convention on Climate Change. Ministry of the Environment. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center of Korea. 2022. 2020 Korean emissions trading system report (2018–2020). Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center of Korea. 2025. 2024 Korean emissions trading system report. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center of Korea. 2025. 2024 National Inventory Document: Republic of Korea's submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The Government of the Republic of Korea. Holling, C. S., and Meffe, G. K. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation biology 10(2): 328-337. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2020. Implementing Effective Emissions Trading Systems. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/implementing-effective-emissions-trading-systems. Accessed: October 20, 2025. International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation). 2023. Effects of climate-related matters on financial statements. International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation). 2023. IFRS S1 general requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation). 2023. IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 1992. Climate Change: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/. Accessed: September 6, 2025. Kwon, D. H., and Ritchie, A. 2021. Developing effective benchmark-based allocation for industrial sectors: The case of the Korean ETS. Asia Society Policy Institute. Leining, C., and Kerr, S. 2016. Lessons learned from the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research. Lubowsi, R., Kim, J., Lee, C., Lee, K., Swartz, J., and De Clara, S. 2016. Republic of Korea: An emissions trading case study. Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), International Emissions Trading Association (IETA), Solutions for Our Climate (SFOC), & Climate Change Research Institute of Korea (CRIK). O'Sullivan, K. P. V., and Flannery, D. J. 2012. A discussion on the resilience of command and control regulation within regulatory behavior theories. Journal of Governance and Regulation 1(1): 15-24. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) .1972. Recommendation of the Council on Guiding Principles concerning International Economic Aspects of Environmental Policies. Available at: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0102. Accessed: October 6, 2025. Pigou, A. C. 2017. The economics of welfare. Routledge. Sopher, P., Mansell, A. and Mardiney, A. 2014. South Korea: The World's Carbon Markets: A Case Study Guide to Emissions Trading. Environmental Defense Fund & International Emissions Trading Association. Superior Court of California. 2013. CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, et al. v CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, et al., Case No.: 34-2012-80001313. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2007. The Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act. United Nations (UN), European Union (EU), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and World Bank Group. 2014. System of environmental-economic accounting 2012: Central framework. United Nations. Available at: https://seea.un.org/content/seea-central-framework. Accessed: October 8, 2025. United Nations (UN). 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/convention_text_with_annexes_english_for_posting.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. United Nations (UN). 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/docs/cop3/l07a01.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. United Nations (UN). 2012. Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol. Available at: https://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/kp_doha_amendment_english.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. United Nations (UN). 2015. Paris Agreement. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. United Nations (UN). 2021. Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement on its third session, held in Glasgow from 31 October to 13 November 2021. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2021_10_add1_adv.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. World Resources Institute (WRI) and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). 2004. The GHG Protocol – A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard revised version. World Bank, Partnership for Market Readiness (PMR), International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). 2021. Emissions Trading In Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation. 2nd ed. World Bank. 2022. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022. Available at: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099045006072224607/p1780300092e910590acb201757ecd54322 World Bank. 2025. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2025. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/state-and-trends-of-carbon-pricing World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 1979. Declaration of the World Climate Conference. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 1997. World Climate Conference - Declaration and supporting documents.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計學系
112353104
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112353104
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 許崇源zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 石蕙語zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Shih, Huei-Yuen_US
dc.creator (作者) 石蕙語zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Shih, Huei-Yuen_US
dc.date (日期) 2026en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2-Mar-2026 12:39:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 2-Mar-2026 12:39:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2-Mar-2026 12:39:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0112353104en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/161889-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計學系zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 112353104zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)   為因應全球氣候變遷挑戰及實現2050年淨零排放目標,我國透過《氣候變遷因應法》建構氣候治理之法制基礎,涵蓋碳費及總量管制與排放交易等碳定價機制。在執行策略上,我國採循序漸進之方式,短期內優先實施碳費,中長期則研議實施總量管制與排放交易制度。依據環境部規劃,將於2026年下半年啟動總量管制與排放交易制度之試行,並預計於2027年形成兩項制度併行之雙軌制碳定價架構。   相較於先行推動的碳費,總量管制與排放交易之實施面臨制度設計及制度相容性之雙重挑戰。前者涉及如何依據我國排放現況、減量目標及行政量能,合理訂定排放上限、配額分配方式及抵換機制,以兼顧減碳成效與市場流動性;後者則須考量新制如何與現行碳費、碳信用機制及溫室氣體盤查登錄制度有效整合。   本文首先探討碳定價的背景、意涵、類別及法律性質,建構碳定價的理論基礎。其次,分析並比較發展成熟之歐盟及韓國總量管制與排放交易制度,作為我國制度設計的借鏡。參酌國際經驗並考量我國現行制度,本文依據《排放交易實務:設計與實施手冊》(Emissions Trading In Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation)第二版之架構,提出我國總量管制與排放交易之制度設計建議。此外,本文亦探討我國現行碳定價制度之會計處理,以及碳定價資訊於永續揭露準則S1號及S2號(IFRS S1、S2)下之揭露議題,釐清相關規範之適用,並提供企業財務報導與資訊揭露之實務參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In response to the challenges of global climate change and the goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050, Taiwan has established a legal foundation for climate governance through the “Climate Change Response Act”, which encompasses carbon pricing mechanisms such as carbon fee and cap-and-trade Scheme. Regarding the implementation strategy, Taiwan adopts a gradual approach: prioritizing the carbon fee in the short term, while evaluating the introduction of cap-and-trade scheme in the medium-to-long term. According to the Ministry of Environment, a pilot cap-and-trade scheme will launch in the second half of 2026, with the aim of establishing a dual-track carbon pricing framework where both systems operate in parallel by 2027. Compared to the carbon fee implemented earlier, the implementation of cap-and-trade faces dual challenges of system design and system compatibility. The former involves how to reasonably determine the emission cap, allowance allocation methods, and offset mechanisms based on Taiwan's emission status, reduction targets, and administrative capacity, in order to balance reduction effectiveness and market liquidity. The latter requires policymakers to consider how the new system can be effectively integrated with the existing carbon fee, carbon credit mechanisms, and the greenhouse gas (GHG) inventory and registration system. This study first explores the background, implications, categories, and legal nature of carbon pricing to construct a theoretical foundation. Secondly, it analyzes and compares the mature Emissions Trading System (ETS) of the EU and South Korea to serve as a reference for ETS design. Drawing on international experience and considering Taiwan's existing systems, this study proposes recommendations for the design of Taiwan's cap-and-trade scheme based on the framework of Emissions Trading In Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation (2nd Edition). Furthermore, this study explores the accounting treatment of Taiwan's current carbon pricing system and disclosure issues regarding carbon pricing information under IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards S1 and S2 (IFRS S1, S2), clarifying the application of relevant regulations and providing practical references for corporate financial reporting and information disclosure.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭 I 摘要 II Abstract III 目錄 IV 圖目錄 V 表目錄 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機與目的 1 第二節 研究問題 3 第三節 研究方法 4 第四節 研究架構 4 第二章 碳定價理論基礎 5 第一節 環境政策工具之流變 5 第二節 碳定價 7 第三章 國際碳定價制度 25 第一節 國際碳定價制度概述 25 第二節 歐盟及韓國之總量管制與排放交易 26 第四章 我國碳定價制度 38 第一節 我國溫室氣體排放趨勢 38 第二節 我國溫室氣體減量目標 40 第三節 我國碳定價制度之基礎 42 第四節 我國現行之碳定價制度 55 第五節 總量管制與排放交易於我國實施之規劃 64 第五章 我國碳定價制度之揭露與會計處理 74 第一節 我國現行碳定價制度之會計處理 74 第二節 我國碳定價制度於IFRS S1及S2下之揭露 80 第六章 結論與建議 85 參考文獻 87zh_TW
dc.format.extent 2410921 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0112353104en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 碳定價zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 總量管制與排放交易zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 氣候變遷因應法zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 永續資訊揭露zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Carbon pricingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cap-and-Trade Schemeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Climate Change Response Acten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sustainability information disclosureen_US
dc.title (題名) 我國碳定價制度研究: 以總量管制與排放交易為核心zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A study on the carbon pricing system in Taiwan: Focusing on Cap-and-Trade Schemeen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen_US
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中華民國行政院主計總處,2023,111年綠色國民所得帳編製報告(環境與經濟帳)。 中華民國行政院國家永續發展委員會,2009,永續發展政策綱領。 中華民國行政院國家發展委員會(國發會),2022,臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明。 中華民國環境部,2024,溫室氣體排放量盤查作業指引113年版。 中華民國環境部氣候變遷署,2025,2025 年中華民國國家溫室氣體排放清冊報告。 中國鋼鐵股份有限公司,2025。2024年永續報告書。 邱晨,2025,氣候變遷因應下之環境公課,中正財經法學,第30期:65-125。 柯格鐘,2008,特別公課之概念及爭議-以釋字第四二六號解釋所討論之空氣污染防制費為例,月旦法學雜誌,第163期:194-215。 施文真,2012,能源稅與碳稅之邊境稅調整措施--以GATT/WTO之合致性為主要討論對象,貿易政策論叢,第17期:157-220。 施文真,2015,排放權交易制度於臺灣之推動現況以及可能引發之法律爭議,月旦法學雜誌,第239期:52-79。 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會,2023,企業持有碳權資產相關會計處理之指引。 財團法人中華民國會計研究發展基金會,2025,IFRS S2「氣候相關揭露」揭露範例-鋼鐵製造商(EM-IS)。 張軒瑜、劉哲良與蔡玲儀,2025,排碳不再無價—臺灣碳費制度概述,會計研究發展月刊,第471期:66-71。 陳衍任,2023,CO2 排放權的制度省思-德國法制的觀察與反思,月旦律評,第18期:10。 陳清秀,2019,稅法總論,臺北市:元照出版有限公司。 陳敏,2019,稅法總論,作者自版。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際財務報導準則第13號「公允價值衡量」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際會計準則第8號「會計政策、會計估計值變動及錯誤」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際會計準則第20號「政府補助之會計及政府輔助之揭露」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025國際會計準則第36號「資產減損」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025國際會計準則第37號「負債準備、或有負債及或有資產」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際會計準則第38號「無形資產」(中文版)。 國際會計準則理事會,2025,國際財務報導解釋第21號「公課」(中文版)。 葉至誠與葉立誠,2011,研究方法與論文寫作,臺北市 : 商鼎文化出版社。 葉俊榮,1990,論環境政策上的經濟誘因:理論依據,國立臺灣大學法學論叢,第20卷第1期:87-111。 蔡茂寅,2009,財政法:第二講 財政收入總論(下),月旦法學教室,第87期:57-66。 廖欽福,2018,能源稅的美麗新世界-環境能源公課之課徵及其憲法界限,華岡法粹,第64期:113-181。 趙家緯與謝雯凱,2007,台灣氣候變遷政策的回顧與展望,全球變遷通訊雜誌,第56期:16-23。 劉哲良,2022,碳環境稅費的設計探討,經濟前瞻,第199期:119-125。 蕭代基,2009,綠色稅制改革之研究(行政院賦稅改革委員會研究報告)。行政院賦稅改革委員會。 Asian Development Bank. 2018. The Korea emissions trading scheme: Challenges and emerging opportunities. Barckow, A., and Faber, E. 2023. Connectivity—what is it and what does it deliver? IFRS Foundation. Available at: https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2023/03/connectivity-what-is-it-and-what-does-it-deliver/. Accessed: January 10, 2026. Barde, J. P. 1994. Economic instruments in environmental policy: lessons from the OECD experience and their relevance to developing economies. Working Paper, OECD Development Centre. Burke, J., and Taschini, L. 2020. Carbon pricing options for Taiwan. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. European Parliament and Council. 2004. Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L 275: 32-46. European Parliament and Council. 2009. Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 January 2009 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community. Official Journal of the European Union L 8: 3. European Commission. 2011. 2011/278/EU: Commission Decision of 27 April 2011 determining transitional Union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to Article 10a of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union L 130: 1–45. European Parliament and Council. 2014. Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments (MiFID II). Official Journal of the European Union L 173: 349. European Securities and Markets Authority. 2024. ESMA market report on EU carbon markets 2024. Finland. 1995. Finland's National Report under the United Nation's Framework Convention on Climate Change. Ministry of the Environment. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center of Korea. 2022. 2020 Korean emissions trading system report (2018–2020). Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center of Korea. 2025. 2024 Korean emissions trading system report. Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center of Korea. 2025. 2024 National Inventory Document: Republic of Korea's submission to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The Government of the Republic of Korea. Holling, C. S., and Meffe, G. K. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conservation biology 10(2): 328-337. International Energy Agency (IEA). 2020. Implementing Effective Emissions Trading Systems. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/implementing-effective-emissions-trading-systems. Accessed: October 20, 2025. International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation). 2023. Effects of climate-related matters on financial statements. International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation). 2023. IFRS S1 general requirements for disclosure of sustainability-related financial information. International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS Foundation). 2023. IFRS S2 climate-related disclosures. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 1992. Climate Change: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/. Accessed: September 6, 2025. Kwon, D. H., and Ritchie, A. 2021. Developing effective benchmark-based allocation for industrial sectors: The case of the Korean ETS. Asia Society Policy Institute. Leining, C., and Kerr, S. 2016. Lessons learned from the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme. Motu Economic and Public Policy Research. Lubowsi, R., Kim, J., Lee, C., Lee, K., Swartz, J., and De Clara, S. 2016. Republic of Korea: An emissions trading case study. Environmental Defense Fund (EDF), International Emissions Trading Association (IETA), Solutions for Our Climate (SFOC), & Climate Change Research Institute of Korea (CRIK). O'Sullivan, K. P. V., and Flannery, D. J. 2012. A discussion on the resilience of command and control regulation within regulatory behavior theories. Journal of Governance and Regulation 1(1): 15-24. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) .1972. Recommendation of the Council on Guiding Principles concerning International Economic Aspects of Environmental Policies. Available at: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0102. Accessed: October 6, 2025. Pigou, A. C. 2017. The economics of welfare. Routledge. Sopher, P., Mansell, A. and Mardiney, A. 2014. South Korea: The World's Carbon Markets: A Case Study Guide to Emissions Trading. Environmental Defense Fund & International Emissions Trading Association. Superior Court of California. 2013. CALIFORNIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, et al. v CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD, et al., Case No.: 34-2012-80001313. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2007. The Plain English Guide to the Clean Air Act. United Nations (UN), European Union (EU), Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and World Bank Group. 2014. System of environmental-economic accounting 2012: Central framework. United Nations. Available at: https://seea.un.org/content/seea-central-framework. Accessed: October 8, 2025. United Nations (UN). 1992. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/convention_text_with_annexes_english_for_posting.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. United Nations (UN). 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/docs/cop3/l07a01.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. United Nations (UN). 2012. Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol. Available at: https://unfccc.int/files/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/kp_doha_amendment_english.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. United Nations (UN). 2015. Paris Agreement. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. United Nations (UN). 2021. Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement on its third session, held in Glasgow from 31 October to 13 November 2021. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2021_10_add1_adv.pdf. Accessed: October 2, 2025. World Resources Institute (WRI) and World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). 2004. The GHG Protocol – A Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard revised version. World Bank, Partnership for Market Readiness (PMR), International Carbon Action Partnership (ICAP). 2021. Emissions Trading In Practice: A Handbook on Design and Implementation. 2nd ed. World Bank. 2022. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2022. Available at: https://documents.worldbank.org/en/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/099045006072224607/p1780300092e910590acb201757ecd54322 World Bank. 2025. State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2025. Available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/state-and-trends-of-carbon-pricing World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 1979. Declaration of the World Climate Conference. World Meteorological Organization (WMO). 1997. World Climate Conference - Declaration and supporting documents.zh_TW