Publications-NSC Projects

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 (複邊)服務貿易協定之研究
A Study of the Trade in Services Agreement
作者 楊光華
貢獻者 國貿系
關鍵詞 服務貿易協定; 國際服務協定; 複邊協定; 服務貿易總協定; 關鍵多數談判; 優惠性貿易自由化
Trade in Services Agreement; International Services Agreement; Plurilateral Agreement; GATS; critical mass negotiation; preferential trade liberalization
日期 2016-05
上傳時間 7-Apr-2026 13:28:46 (UTC+8)
摘要 由於對於杜哈回合談判進展充滿挫折感,服務貿易談判真正之友於 2012 年發起了複邊的服務貿易談判,即所謂的「服務貿易協定(原名國際服務協定)」談判。該談判並未邀請世界貿易組織秘書處參與,且對非參與成員亦不公開,為其未來多邊化蒙上不少陰影,再加上金磚四國及星、馬、泰等服務主要輸入國並未參與,亦為其能否滿足參與國之出口利益畫上問號。儘管如此,由於台灣洽簽之自由貿易協定非常有限,且與世界三大服務貿易市場:歐、美、日皆無自由貿易協定之安排,故利用此談判突破其自身洽簽自由貿易協定之落後局面、並拓展對其經濟發展日益重要之服務貿易市場,無論是從經濟利益之觀點抑或在經貿政策之重要性皆不在話下,縱使此複邊談判最後並無法達到關鍵多數而多邊化,僅淪為服務貿易總協定第五條之經濟整合協定,亦同。本研究因此從三方面觀察此談判之發展:一、多邊化之可能法律取徑,二、國際服務貿易規範新規則制訂之發展,三、服務貿易市場開放之談判新模式與可能效益。除了充實國際服務貿易法之研究外,更盼提供正參與談判之我國有關談判立場擬訂之參考。
Frustrated with the impasse of the Doha Round negotiations, the Really Good Friends of Services (RGFS) launched a plurilateral service trade negotiation, i.e., negotiations of the so-called “Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA, originally named as International Services Agreement, ISA)”. The negotiations of TiSA remains closed among the participants without allowing any third party, including the WTO Secretariat, as observers and therefore cast a shadow on its way towards multilateralization. Moreover, major services importers, such as the BRICs, Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand are outside the circle. Thus, whether TiSA can meet the participants’ export interest also becomes questionable. Despite so, because Taiwan has very limited numbers of FTAs and has no FTA with any of the three largest service trade markets, i.e., the E.U., the U.S., and Japan, the economic gains Taiwan can have will be significant and the policy implication is also important without saying when Taiwan uses TiSA to make up its very behind FTAs negotiations and explore new services markets for its economic growth no matter whether TiSA can be multilateralized in the future or just turns out to be an GATS article V EIA. This study observes from three angles of the TiSA negotiations: 1. the possible legal route for it to be multilateralized, 2. the development of new rule-making for service trade, and 3.the new modality of market-access negotiations and its possible effect. The study is aimed at providing policy recommendation for Taiwan’s negotiation positions in addition to making contribution to the research of international service trade law.
關聯 科技部, MOST103-2410-H004-135, 103.08-104.07
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 國貿系
dc.creator (作者) 楊光華
dc.date (日期) 2016-05
dc.date.accessioned 7-Apr-2026 13:28:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 7-Apr-2026 13:28:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 7-Apr-2026 13:28:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=181953-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 由於對於杜哈回合談判進展充滿挫折感,服務貿易談判真正之友於 2012 年發起了複邊的服務貿易談判,即所謂的「服務貿易協定(原名國際服務協定)」談判。該談判並未邀請世界貿易組織秘書處參與,且對非參與成員亦不公開,為其未來多邊化蒙上不少陰影,再加上金磚四國及星、馬、泰等服務主要輸入國並未參與,亦為其能否滿足參與國之出口利益畫上問號。儘管如此,由於台灣洽簽之自由貿易協定非常有限,且與世界三大服務貿易市場:歐、美、日皆無自由貿易協定之安排,故利用此談判突破其自身洽簽自由貿易協定之落後局面、並拓展對其經濟發展日益重要之服務貿易市場,無論是從經濟利益之觀點抑或在經貿政策之重要性皆不在話下,縱使此複邊談判最後並無法達到關鍵多數而多邊化,僅淪為服務貿易總協定第五條之經濟整合協定,亦同。本研究因此從三方面觀察此談判之發展:一、多邊化之可能法律取徑,二、國際服務貿易規範新規則制訂之發展,三、服務貿易市場開放之談判新模式與可能效益。除了充實國際服務貿易法之研究外,更盼提供正參與談判之我國有關談判立場擬訂之參考。
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Frustrated with the impasse of the Doha Round negotiations, the Really Good Friends of Services (RGFS) launched a plurilateral service trade negotiation, i.e., negotiations of the so-called “Trade in Services Agreement (TiSA, originally named as International Services Agreement, ISA)”. The negotiations of TiSA remains closed among the participants without allowing any third party, including the WTO Secretariat, as observers and therefore cast a shadow on its way towards multilateralization. Moreover, major services importers, such as the BRICs, Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand are outside the circle. Thus, whether TiSA can meet the participants’ export interest also becomes questionable. Despite so, because Taiwan has very limited numbers of FTAs and has no FTA with any of the three largest service trade markets, i.e., the E.U., the U.S., and Japan, the economic gains Taiwan can have will be significant and the policy implication is also important without saying when Taiwan uses TiSA to make up its very behind FTAs negotiations and explore new services markets for its economic growth no matter whether TiSA can be multilateralized in the future or just turns out to be an GATS article V EIA. This study observes from three angles of the TiSA negotiations: 1. the possible legal route for it to be multilateralized, 2. the development of new rule-making for service trade, and 3.the new modality of market-access negotiations and its possible effect. The study is aimed at providing policy recommendation for Taiwan’s negotiation positions in addition to making contribution to the research of international service trade law.
dc.format.extent 115 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 科技部, MOST103-2410-H004-135, 103.08-104.07
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 服務貿易協定; 國際服務協定; 複邊協定; 服務貿易總協定; 關鍵多數談判; 優惠性貿易自由化
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Trade in Services Agreement; International Services Agreement; Plurilateral Agreement; GATS; critical mass negotiation; preferential trade liberalization
dc.title (題名) (複邊)服務貿易協定之研究
dc.title (題名) A Study of the Trade in Services Agreement
dc.type (資料類型) report