| dc.contributor | 國貿系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 楊光華 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2020-05 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 7-Apr-2026 13:28:52 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 7-Apr-2026 13:28:52 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 7-Apr-2026 13:28:52 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=181957 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 爭端解決機制向被視為世界貿易組織的「皇冠之珠」，然而隨著制衡此「凖司法功能」的其他政治機構的議事效能不彰，上訴機構對於曖昧不明協定條款的解釋努力，經常被有些會員批評為司法造法。為反制「司法積極主義」，上訴機構成員之任命以及再任命程序遭到這些會員之不當杯葛與延宕，使相關運作因成員人數嚴重不足而面臨空前危機。本研究探索前述危機可能成因，並藉著分析各種因應方案之法理基礎以及所需之政治意願程度，評估方案之可行性。鑑於相關解決之道仍有賴會員廣泛共識之形成、或是爭端當事國雙方之諒解，故預期上訴機構危機之化解，非待會員重新珍視此皇冠之珠，並積極付出談判努力，無以竟其功。為避免類似危機重演，主張國際組織之治理不應忽略國際政治之現實，為確保世貿組織得來不易之法治體系的永續，凡無法以談判達成者，即不應透過司法手段爭取，不僅是上訴機構本身、世貿組織會員亦必須有此認知。另一方面，從法律經濟之觀點，惟有上訴機構採取更高的司法自制，方能促使會員將規則之發展導回談判之正軌，並為規則談判之成功展現更多的彈性。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The dispute settlement system is widely considered to be the “jewel in the crown” of the World Trade Organization. Along with the decision-making inefficiency of the political organs, which are supposed to check and balance the quasi-judicial power, the efforts made by the Appellate Body to interpret deliberately ambiguous treaty provisions have often been criticized by some Members as judicial law-making. To counteract such judicial activism, those Members blocked or delayed the appointment or re-appointment of the Appellate Body Members. As a result, the Appellate Body encountered an unprecedented operational crisis caused by severe shortage of members. This Study explores the possible reasons behind such crisis and evaluates the feasibility of various solutions by analyzing their legal basis and political willingness required. Given relevant solutions require broad consensus among Members or mutual understanding between disputed parties, it is expected that the crisis cannot be resolved until Members once again deem highly this “jewel in crown” and therefore become more committed to negotiations for solutions. To prevent such crisis in the future, it argues the governance of international organizations should not overlook the reality of international politics. Both the Appellate Body and Members of the WTO should recognize that for the sustainability of the system of “rule by law” of the World Trade Organization, which has taken decades to build up, whatever cannot be attained through trade negotiations shall never use dispute settlement processes to fight for. On the other hand, only could the Appellate Body exercise more judicial self-restraint, Members would return to the normal track of rule-making, that is, through negotiations, and further show more flexibility aimed at the success of negotiations for rules. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST107-2410-H004-052, 107.08-108.07 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 世界貿易組織; 爭端解決規則及程序瞭解書; 爭端解決機構; 上訴機構; 司法積極主義; 權力分立; 再任命程序; 成員遴選程序; 仲裁; 程序性協議 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | World Trade Organization; Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Dispute (DSU); Dispute Settlement Body (DSB); Appellate Body; Judicial Activism; Separation of Powers; Reappointment; Appointment/Selection Process; Arbitration; Procedural Agreement | |
| dc.title (題名) | 世界貿易組織上訴機構之危機與可能的解決之道 | |
| dc.title (題名) | The Crisis and Possible Solutions of the Appellate Body of the Wto | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
