| dc.contributor | 國貿系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 楊培侃 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2019-04 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 7-Apr-2026 13:29:17 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 7-Apr-2026 13:29:17 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 7-Apr-2026 13:29:17 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=181975 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 國際法碎裂化儼然成為晚近國際法發展的現象與趨勢。國際投資法與其他國際法規範間之關連性問題，隨著各界對國際投資法正當性的質疑，益發顯示其重要性。尤其晚近若干亟具爭議的投資仲裁案件，影響地主國規制權之行使與公共利益之維護，引發國際上對投資人與地主國爭端解決機制的批評聲浪，各界相繼提出可能的改革方案。鑑於地主國規制權之行使常基於非投資法之其他國際法規範，諸如：公衛、環保或人權等，投資仲裁案件中常面臨如何處理此等非投資法規範在解決投資保障爭端時所扮演之角色與功能的問題，因此，此等「投資與…」連結議題之探討，繼「貿易與…」的連結議題後，亦日益受到重視。本研究計畫旨在從國際法碎裂化的角度，探討投資仲裁實務於解釋或適用國際投資法規範時，如何處理非投資法之其他國際法規範之問題，分析此等非投資法在管轄權與實體投資保障義務之關連與影響，歸納仲裁庭採行的審查標準藉以釐清地主國規制權與投資人權利保障之合理界限。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The fragmentation of international law has become a phenomenon and trend of the development of international law nowadays. The inter-relationship between international investment law and other norms of international law also becomes an important issue when the legitimacy of the international investment law is frequently criticized by the international community. In particular, a number of controversial investment arbitration disputes have threatened the exercise of the regulatory power of the host state in pursuit of the public interest. Such legal challenges have aroused the international criticism over the investor-to-state dispute settlement mechanism and various proposals for reforms of current international investment regime. Given the fact that the exercise of regulatory power in the host states is often based on substantive international norms other than investment law, such as international regimes of public health, environmental protection or human rights, the investment arbitration tribunals are often faced with the issues over the role or functions of such “non-investment laws” in resolving investment arbitration disputes. Unlike a long history of discussion over the trade linkage issue, these “investment and ...” issues have long been neglected. Therefore, this research project aims to examine the role and functions of these “non-investment laws” in the investment arbitration disputes from the perspective of fragmentation of international law, and to analyze how the arbitral tribunals interpret or apply the “non-investment laws” when adjudicating the jurisdictional or substantive issues on the alleged violations of investment protection obligations. The ultimate purpose is to examine if any different standards of review being adopted by the arbitral tribunal so as to clarify the reasonable boundary between the rights to regulate and the private rights of investors under current practice of international investment law. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST106-2410-H004-080, 106.08-107.07 | |
| dc.title (題名) | 從國際法碎裂化探討國際投資法下地主國規制權與投資保障之界限 | |
| dc.title (題名) | Exploring the Boundary between Right to Regulate and Investment Protection from the Perspective of Fragmentation of International Law | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
