Publications-NSC Projects
Article View/Open
Publication Export
-
Google ScholarTM
NCCU Library
Citation Infomation
Related Publications in TAIR
題名 「物體的革命」—論俄國立體未來主義詩歌的物體詩學
Rebellion of Objects: Russian Cubo-Futurism and Poetics of Objects作者 鄢定嘉 貢獻者 斯拉夫文系 關鍵詞 立體未來主義; 物體; 詞語的復活; 陌生化; 無意義詩歌; 詩學
Cubo-Futurism; object; resurrection of words; defamiliarization; abstruse poetry; poetics日期 2018-03 上傳時間 16-Jul-2026 13:52:50 (UTC+8) 摘要 物體（вещь）自古以來就是哲學與藝術議題。在文學創作中，則一直要到寫實主義時期， 為了突顯人物性格、品味和社會地位，物體一躍成為僅次於人物的重要元素。 然而，工業革命帶來的科技進步及現代化運動，讓人類開始感覺物體的強大力量。俄國 未來主義中最激進的立體未來主義（кубофутуризм）詩人，如克魯喬尼赫（А. Кручёных, 1886-1968）、馬雅科夫斯基（В. Маяковский, 1893-1930）、赫列勃尼科夫（В. Хлебников, 1885-1922）等人歌詠現代科技，在創作中則師法立體主義繪畫去實體的精神，以「無意義詩 歌」（заумная поэзия）表現世紀之交的躁動氛圍，並以「物體的起義」（восстание вещей） 概念，思考人與物的關係，暗示現代世界人物易位的圖景。 本計畫擬先從歷史文化脈絡，探討十九、二十世紀之交，俄國社會中瀰漫的末日世界感 受（эсхатологическое мироощущение）之形成，再從形式主義（формализм）大將什克洛夫 斯基（В. Шкловский, 1893-1984）「詞語的復活」（воскрешение слов）、「陌生化」（отстранение） 等論點對立體未來主義詩人創作觀的影響，最後分析該流派代表作品的物體詩學，以及物體 背後反映的美學及哲學意涵。
Object (вещь) has always been a subject of philosophy and arts. In literature, however, it is not until the realistic period that the object, emphasizing characteristics, sense and social status of character, became an important element. Modernization as well as the progress of science and technology was introduced by the industrial revolution. Since then, people began to sense the massive power of object. The most radical among Russian Futurists are the Cubo-Futuristic poets, including A. Kruchenykh (А. Кручёных, 1886-1968), V. Mayakovsky (В. Маяковский, 1893-1930), V. Khlebnikov (В. Хлебников, 1885-1922), etc.. They wrote about modern technology, expressed the anxious atmosphere of the turn of the century. Their abstruse poetry (заумная поэзия) followed the spirit of cubist paintings, eliminates the concrete form. Using the concept of “rebellion of objects” (восстание вещей), they contemplated and hinted the translocation of human and object in modern world. In our project we will first probe into the eschatological attitude among Russian society at the turn of the century, from a historical and cultural viewpoint. Next, we will discuss how concepts of Russian formalist Viktor Shklovsky (В. Шкловский, 1893-1984), such as “resurrection of words” (воскрешение слов) and “defamiliarization” (отстранение), affect Cubo-Futuristic literary creation. Finally, analyzing several representative Cubo-Futuristic literary works, we will explain the poetics of objects and the aesthetical and philosophical implication of objects.關聯 科技部, MOST105-2410-H004-116, 105.08-106.07 資料類型 report dc.contributor 斯拉夫文系 dc.creator (作者) 鄢定嘉 dc.date (日期) 2018-03 dc.date.accessioned 16-Jul-2026 13:52:50 (UTC+8) - dc.date.available 16-Jul-2026 13:52:50 (UTC+8) - dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 16-Jul-2026 13:52:50 (UTC+8) - dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=183347 - dc.description.abstract (摘要) 物體（вещь）自古以來就是哲學與藝術議題。在文學創作中，則一直要到寫實主義時期， 為了突顯人物性格、品味和社會地位，物體一躍成為僅次於人物的重要元素。 然而，工業革命帶來的科技進步及現代化運動，讓人類開始感覺物體的強大力量。俄國 未來主義中最激進的立體未來主義（кубофутуризм）詩人，如克魯喬尼赫（А. Кручёных, 1886-1968）、馬雅科夫斯基（В. Маяковский, 1893-1930）、赫列勃尼科夫（В. Хлебников, 1885-1922）等人歌詠現代科技，在創作中則師法立體主義繪畫去實體的精神，以「無意義詩 歌」（заумная поэзия）表現世紀之交的躁動氛圍，並以「物體的起義」（восстание вещей） 概念，思考人與物的關係，暗示現代世界人物易位的圖景。 本計畫擬先從歷史文化脈絡，探討十九、二十世紀之交，俄國社會中瀰漫的末日世界感 受（эсхатологическое мироощущение）之形成，再從形式主義（формализм）大將什克洛夫 斯基（В. Шкловский, 1893-1984）「詞語的復活」（воскрешение слов）、「陌生化」（отстранение） 等論點對立體未來主義詩人創作觀的影響，最後分析該流派代表作品的物體詩學，以及物體 背後反映的美學及哲學意涵。 dc.description.abstract (摘要) Object (вещь) has always been a subject of philosophy and arts. In literature, however, it is not until the realistic period that the object, emphasizing characteristics, sense and social status of character, became an important element. Modernization as well as the progress of science and technology was introduced by the industrial revolution. Since then, people began to sense the massive power of object. The most radical among Russian Futurists are the Cubo-Futuristic poets, including A. Kruchenykh (А. Кручёных, 1886-1968), V. Mayakovsky (В. Маяковский, 1893-1930), V. Khlebnikov (В. Хлебников, 1885-1922), etc.. They wrote about modern technology, expressed the anxious atmosphere of the turn of the century. Their abstruse poetry (заумная поэзия) followed the spirit of cubist paintings, eliminates the concrete form. Using the concept of “rebellion of objects” (восстание вещей), they contemplated and hinted the translocation of human and object in modern world. In our project we will first probe into the eschatological attitude among Russian society at the turn of the century, from a historical and cultural viewpoint. Next, we will discuss how concepts of Russian formalist Viktor Shklovsky (В. Шкловский, 1893-1984), such as “resurrection of words” (воскрешение слов) and “defamiliarization” (отстранение), affect Cubo-Futuristic literary creation. Finally, analyzing several representative Cubo-Futuristic literary works, we will explain the poetics of objects and the aesthetical and philosophical implication of objects. dc.format.extent 116 bytes - dc.format.mimetype text/html - dc.relation (關聯) 科技部, MOST105-2410-H004-116, 105.08-106.07 dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立體未來主義; 物體; 詞語的復活; 陌生化; 無意義詩歌; 詩學 dc.subject (關鍵詞) Cubo-Futurism; object; resurrection of words; defamiliarization; abstruse poetry; poetics dc.title (題名) 「物體的革命」—論俄國立體未來主義詩歌的物體詩學 dc.title (題名) Rebellion of Objects: Russian Cubo-Futurism and Poetics of Objects dc.type (資料類型) report
