| dc.contributor | 日文系 | |
| dc.creator (作者) | 鄭家瑜 | |
| dc.date (日期) | 2023-03 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 22-Jul-2026 10:27:45 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 22-Jul-2026 10:27:45 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 22-Jul-2026 10:27:45 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=183402 | - |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 日本第一本正史－《日本書紀》，全書使用漢文文體，並且大量採用中國式的文字潤飾以及典故。漢籍對於《日本書紀》的影響與形塑之重要性不言而喻。然而，究竟《日本書紀》是如何「使用」這些漢籍文句和典故?又或在文句和典故之外，還有許多中國式的思想被借用?這些思想與《日本書紀》的編撰有何關聯?《日本書紀》之「出典」的分析雖已有一些研究成果(例如:小島憲之等)，但針對以上這些問題卻未能有詳細的檢討。漢籍既是形塑《日本書紀》的重要元素，當然這些問題對於《日本書紀》研究而言不能忽視。有基於此，本計畫延續104-105年度(104-2410-H-004-119-MY2「日本書紀之漢籍典據－以天武紀(上) (下)和持統紀為中心」)以及106-108年度(106-2410-H-004 -020 -MY3「《日本書紀》之漢籍典據與表現--以「皇極紀」「孝德紀」「齊明紀」「天智紀」為中心」)的研究方向，繼續以文學研究的角度來深入剖析《日本書紀》與漢籍之間的關係；並且將研究對象由皇極(重祚後為齊明)、孝德、天智天皇往上追溯至敏達、用明、崇峻、推古、舒明天皇。採用神野志隆光氏之「作品論」的觀點（詳細請參考「研究背景」），並以語法、句法、漢字、文章構造、人物形象描述以及思想或典故之使用等等幾個面向做為觀察指標，探討《日本書紀》第二十至二十三卷－《敏達紀》《用明紀・崇峻紀》《推古紀》《舒明紀》之漢籍出典依據，進一步討論其表現和意義，以及在東亞漢字文化圈中《日本書紀》的定位。 | |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | The frist official history of Japanese is “Nihonsyoki".It was written in Chinese characters and rhetoric, alluded a lot from Chinese culture. The importance of old Chinese books affecting and shaping “Nihonsyoki” is evident. But on the other hand, how does "NihonSyoki" "use" texts and allusions of these old Chinese books? How do they implicate in “Nihonsyoki”? Or are there lots of China-style ideas to be borrowed except for texts and allusions? What is the relationship between these ideas and “Nihonsyoki”? Though there have been some studies about allusion and citation of “Nihonsyoki” (like Kozimanoriyuki etc.), they still didn’t answer the questions above in details. Since old Chinese books constitute "Nihonsyoki", certainly we can’t ignore these questions if we want to study “Nihonsyoki”.Based on this viewpoint, this project attempts to study the five Emperors Bidatsu, Yōmei, Sushun, Suiko and Jomei. This paper would like to research the Chinese allusion and citation by grammar, syntax, using of Chinese characters, ideas and allusions, text composing, description of figures, etc. Furthermore, we would like to discuss the performance and meaning of old Chinese books in “Nihonsyoki”, and its position in the East Asian community of Chinese character by viewing from “work theory” of Konositakamitu. | |
| dc.format.extent | 116 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | text/html | - |
| dc.relation (關聯) | 科技部, MOST109-2410-H004-097, 109.08-110.07 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 《日本書紀》; 漢籍出典; 敏達天皇; 用明天皇; 崇峻天皇; 推古天皇; 舒明天皇 | |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Nihonsyoki Allusion of old Chinese books; Emperor Bidatsu; Emperor Yōmei; Emperor Sushun; Emperor Suiko; Emperor Jomei | |
| dc.title (題名) | 《日本書紀》之漢籍典據與表現—以「敏達紀」「用明紀・崇峻紀」「推古紀」「舒明紀」為中心 | |
| dc.title (題名) | The Performance, Allusion and Citation of Old Chinese Books in ＂Nihonsyoki＂: Concentrating on “Chronicle of Emperor Bidatsu”, “Chronicle of Emperor Yōmei”, “Chronicle of Emperor Sushun”, “Chronicle of Emperor Suiko” And“Chronicle of Emperor Jomei” | |
| dc.type (資料類型) | report | |
