Publications- NSC Projects

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 洞悉編輯同儕審查:使用「圍繞文本討論」與「文本歷程」瞭解編輯與作者決策
Insights into Editorial Peer Review: Using Talk around Text and Text Histories to Understand Editor and Author Decision Making
作者 謝思蕾
貢獻者 外文中心
關鍵詞 編輯同儕審查; 英文以研究及出版之目的; 全球化; 高等教育; 多種語言研究者; 國內學術期刊; 圍繞文本討論; 定性研究; 文本歷程
Editorial peer review; English for research and publication purposes; globalization; higher education; multilingual researchers; national journals; talk around text; qualitative research; text histories
日期 2025-11
上傳時間 27-Jul-2026 16:08:45 (UTC+8)
摘要 The fundamental issue addressed in this project is the “publish (in English) or perish” mandate scholars in Taiwan face and the recognition that multilingual academic writers tend to experience additional burden compared to Anglophone writers. The burden can derive from linguistic and/or material challenges, but it tends to appear in problematic manuscripts that editors reject “in house” without consulting outside reviewers or are eventually rejected after peer review in which referees are frustrated with inadequate manuscript revision. These decisions are consequential to scholars’ professional prospects and their success depends on their ability to respond to reviewer and editor feedback appropriately. Editorial peer review is the core activity of academic publication and production, but at most journals, the scene behind the submission platform is hidden from authors and editors may not be aware of reasons behind authors’ responses and decisions. This gap contributes to misunderstandings and friction in the publishing process. Therefore, the purpose of this project is to gain a clearer understanding of how editors and authors make decisions regarding manuscripts at key points during the peer review process. Gathering text histories and conducting talk around text interviews with editor-author pairs for case studies of individual manuscript trajectories will allow editors to better understand authors’ challenges and authors to gain insight into editors’ concerns. This project aims to contribute a critical pragmatic view of editorial peer review at journals published in Taiwan. It has implications for journals, higher education institutions, and government entities concerned with knowledge production in Taiwan.
關聯 國家科學及技術委員會, NSTC112-2410-H004-046, 112.08-113.07
資料類型 report
dc.contributor 外文中心
dc.creator (作者) 謝思蕾
dc.date (日期) 2025-11
dc.date.accessioned 27-Jul-2026 16:08:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 27-Jul-2026 16:08:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 27-Jul-2026 16:08:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=183505-
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The fundamental issue addressed in this project is the “publish (in English) or perish” mandate scholars in Taiwan face and the recognition that multilingual academic writers tend to experience additional burden compared to Anglophone writers. The burden can derive from linguistic and/or material challenges, but it tends to appear in problematic manuscripts that editors reject “in house” without consulting outside reviewers or are eventually rejected after peer review in which referees are frustrated with inadequate manuscript revision. These decisions are consequential to scholars’ professional prospects and their success depends on their ability to respond to reviewer and editor feedback appropriately. Editorial peer review is the core activity of academic publication and production, but at most journals, the scene behind the submission platform is hidden from authors and editors may not be aware of reasons behind authors’ responses and decisions. This gap contributes to misunderstandings and friction in the publishing process. Therefore, the purpose of this project is to gain a clearer understanding of how editors and authors make decisions regarding manuscripts at key points during the peer review process. Gathering text histories and conducting talk around text interviews with editor-author pairs for case studies of individual manuscript trajectories will allow editors to better understand authors’ challenges and authors to gain insight into editors’ concerns. This project aims to contribute a critical pragmatic view of editorial peer review at journals published in Taiwan. It has implications for journals, higher education institutions, and government entities concerned with knowledge production in Taiwan.
dc.format.extent 116 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype text/html-
dc.relation (關聯) 國家科學及技術委員會, NSTC112-2410-H004-046, 112.08-113.07
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 編輯同儕審查; 英文以研究及出版之目的; 全球化; 高等教育; 多種語言研究者; 國內學術期刊; 圍繞文本討論; 定性研究; 文本歷程
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Editorial peer review; English for research and publication purposes; globalization; higher education; multilingual researchers; national journals; talk around text; qualitative research; text histories
dc.title (題名) 洞悉編輯同儕審查:使用「圍繞文本討論」與「文本歷程」瞭解編輯與作者決策
dc.title (題名) Insights into Editorial Peer Review: Using Talk around Text and Text Histories to Understand Editor and Author Decision Making
dc.type (資料類型) report