學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 吸菸者多重自我概念與品牌人格之一致性對香菸品牌態度之影響
作者 倪培軒
貢獻者 祝鳳岡
倪培軒
關鍵詞 自我概念
品牌人格
一致性效果
吸菸動機
吸菸行為
日期 2005
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 16:14:03 (UTC+8)
摘要 一致性理論源於心理學中自我概念的延伸,其主要論點便是人會選擇與己之自我概念趨同的物、事、或人;並且極力避免與己之自我概念不同的物、事、或人互動。其道理來自於自我的穩定性及避免矛盾,自我往往讓自己處於一種習慣的狀態,並不希望改變。
     
     自Grubb and Grathwohl(1967)透過Rogers(1951)的個體自我增強理論(theory of individual self enhancement)為基礎,假設自我概念對個體而言是一種價值,並且個體的行為會朝向增強或保護他們的自我概念為方向,因此購買、展示行為或商品使用,皆會透過購買符號商品的過程來加強自我概念後,將此理論運用到廣告行銷領域的研究便開始蓬勃發展。本研究即是透過一致性理論來觀察吸菸者與其所喜好的香菸品牌間之關係,並輔以Aaker,J的品牌人格理論做為觀察面向。最後在本研究架構上將吸菸動機及吸菸行為一併納入其中討論。
     
     根據本研究對吸菸行為的觀察,認為吸菸行為是一種社會性行為,因此決定探討自我概念的三個面向,分別為真實自我、理想自我、及社會自我。自我概念及品牌人格的測量,則同時使用Aaker(1997)的品牌人格量表測之。
     
     研究結果發現:自我概念與品牌人格越趨同者,確實較自我概念與品牌人格不趨同者,會對品牌產生較好的態度。並且三個面向的自我概念在皮爾森分析下皆與品牌態度呈正相關,最後再經由迴歸分析後得知具有預測能力的變數則是理想自我。
     
     吸菸動機對品牌態度也同時具有影響力,但較理想自我概念一致性來得弱。而吸菸行為則是發現使用頻率與理想自我概念一致性有不相上下的正向影響力;而菸齡在檢測上則是發現對品牌態度呈現負向影響;最後每日吸菸量對品牌態度則是毫無影響力。
參考文獻 李勝祥(1989),《台北地區吸菸人口生活型態.品牌態度及消費行為之相關研究》,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
陳富莉,李蘭:《青少年菸品消費認同與吸菸行為之研究—以臺北縣某兩所高職學生為例》,台灣衛誌2004;23(1):59-70
李蘭、潘怜燕(2000),〈台灣地區成年人之吸菸率與吸菸行為:八十八年度之全國性調查〉,《中華衛誌》,19-6:423-436。
李景美(1993),台北市國小、國中及高中生對菸品廣告之反應研究,《衛生報導》,3(9):40-42
沈雲驄、湯宗勳譯(1998),《品牌行銷法則》,台北:商周。(Aaker著)
林世寅(1993),《消費價值與品牌選擇之研究 : 以香菸品牌之萬寶路與長壽為例 》,國立台灣大學商學所碩士論文
林昆宏(1987),《吸菸者的生活型態與吸菸動機之研究》,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
林紡而(2001),《台北地區年輕女性吸菸行為之初探性研究》,國立台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。
吳真瑋(1999),《品牌個性與品牌關係關聯性之研究》,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文
吳政衛(2004),《汽車品牌個性、消費者自我概念投射與其購買意願程度之關聯性研究》,第十二屆中華民國廣告暨公共關係學術與實務研討會論文
周桂如(2000),《吸菸之行為研究》,臺北:國家衛生研究院。
徐明郁(1999),《消費者自我概念與品牌個性之一致性對購買意願之影響》,成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
陳富莉(1997)媒體傳播訴求之分析-以吸菸議題為例,《衛生教育雜誌》,17:51-58
陳富莉(2001),《論菸品消費文化與青少年菸品消費行為 = A study on cigarette consumer culture and the youth cigarette consumption behavior》,國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所博士論文
陳怡如(2001),《香菸廣告之接觸、認同與吸菸行為之關係 : 以北縣高職學生為例 = The relationship between the contact and identification of cigarette advertising and the students` smoking behavior in vocational high school in Taipei County》,國立臺灣大學公共衛生學院衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文
陳俐琦(1998),《品牌個性構成向度之研究》,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
陳錦琦(1985),《從態度與主觀規範的因素探討國中生之抽菸意向》,國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文
陳燕鈴(2003),《台灣香菸廣告訊息內容之研究》,國立政治大學廣告學研究所碩士論文
張君玫、黃鵬仁 譯(1995),《消費》,台北:巨流。(Bocock, R.著)
郭鐘隆(2003),《不吸菸與健康促進》,臺北:國家衛生研究院。
楊雪華(2003),《高中生的同儕關係與吸菸行為 : 社會網絡觀點 = Social network and smoking behavior of high school students》,國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所博士論文
黃恆正譯(1988),《符號社會的消費》,遠流出版社。(星野克美等著 )
黃淑貞(2000),《吸菸之流行病學研究》,臺北:國家衛生研究院。
黃堅厚(民88),《人格心理學》,台北:心理出版社
童曉君(1999),《廣告訴求、廣告代言人、自我監控程度、消費者與代言人之人格一致性對廣告效果的影響》,元智大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
蔡文嘉(2002),《自我概念、生活型態與品牌形象對消費者購買意願之影響 : 化妝品個案研究 = The Influence of Self-Concept,Life-Style,and Brand Image on Consumers` Purchase Intention : A Case Study of Cosmetic》,國立中興大學行銷研究所碩士論文
趙政豪(2000),《品牌與消費者間人格自我狀態互動之研究-交流分析觀點》,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文
齊家樑(1991),《商店形象/自我形象一致性與店內購買行為之研究 : 以永和市某超級市場為例》,私立東吳大學商學院管理學研究所碩士論文
鄭英輝,「品牌人格與產品類別對品牌延伸評價的影響」,國立中央大學企業管理 研究所碩士論文,民國87年6月。
Aaker, Jennifer L. (1999), “The Malleable Self: The Role of Self Expression in Persuasion”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol XXXVI, 45-57
Aaker, J. L.(1997), "Dimensions of Brand Personality," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34(August), pp.347-356.
Aaker, J. L.(1997), "Brand Personality in Japan: Examining the Cross- Cultural Meaning of Brands Personality Dimensions," unpublished paper, UCLA Anderson Graduate School of Management.
Adam P. Heath, Don Scott.(1998),” The self-concept and image congruence hypothesis An empirical evaluation in the motor vehicle market” European Journal Of Marketing Bradford:1998. Vol. 32, Iss. 11/12, p. 1110-1123
Ahmad Jamal, Mark M H Goode(2001)”Consumers and brands: A study of the impact of self-image congruence on brand preference and satisfaction”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning Bradford: 2001. Vol. 19, Iss. 6/7, p. 482-492 (11 pp.)
Arnett JJ, Terhanian G. (1998)Adolescents’ responses to cigarette advertisements: links between exposure, liking, and the appeal of smoking. Tobacco Control;7:129-133.
Batra, Rajeev, Donald R. Lehmann, and Dipinder Singh (1993), "The Brand Personality Component of Brand Goodwill: Some Antecedents and Consequences," in Brand Equity and Advertising, David A. Aaker and Alexander Biel, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Belk, Russell W. (1988) "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (September), 139-68
Berndt TJ and Keefe K.(1995) Friends` influence on adolescents` adjustment to school. Child Dev; 66:1312-29.
Botvin GJ, Goldberg CJ, Botvin EM, et al.(1993) Somking Behavior of Adolescents Exposed to Cigarette Advertising. Public Heakth Reports;108:217-224.
Chang, C. (2000). The effects of personality differences on product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 26-33.
Claudia Lujic, Martin Reuter, Petra Netter(2004),”Psychobiological Theories of Smoking and Smoking Motivation”, European Psychologist [PsycARTICLES]. 2005.Vol.10, Iss. 1; pg. 1
David L.Loudon,Albert J.Della Bitta,(1979),《Consumer Behavior》
Dielman, T. E., Campanell, P. C., Shope, J. I., et al. (1987). Susceptibility to peer pressure, self-esteem, and health locus of control as correlates of adolescent substance abuse. Health Education Quarterly, 14, 207-221.
Digman, J. M.(1990),”Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model,”Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Dolich, I. J. (1969), “Congruence relationships between self image and product brands”,Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 6,No. 1, pp. 80-84 .
Eiser, J., Eiser, C., Gammage, P., & Morgan, M. (1989). Health locus of control and health beliefs in relation to adolescent smoking. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 1059-1065.
Emma N Banister, Margaret K Hogg(2004),” Negative symbolic consumption and consumers` dive for self-esteem: The case of the fashion industry”, European Journal of Marketing Bradford: 2004. Vol. 38, Iss. 7, p. 850-868
Ericksen, M. K. (1996), “Using self-congruity and ideal Congruity to predict purchase intention : a European perspective”, Journal of Euromarketing, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 41-56.
Feighery E,Borzekowski D L.G.,Schoolar C,et al(1998).Seeing,wanting,owning:the relationship between recepifivity to tobacco marketing and smoking susceptibility in young people.Tobacco Control;7:123-128
Fischer PM, Schwartz MP, Richards JW etal(1991). Brand Logo Recognition by Children Aged 3 to 6 years: Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel. JAMA; 266(22):3415- 8.
Goldberg, L. R.(1990), “An Alternative Description of Personality,” The Big Five Factor Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, pp. 1216~1229.
Graeff, T. R.(1996), "Image Congruence Effects on Product Evaluations: The Role of Self-Monitoring and Public/Private Consumption,"Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 13(Aug), pp.481-499.
Graeff, Timothy R.(1996),” Using promotional messages to manage the effects of brand and self-image on brand evaluations” The Journal Of Consumer Marketing Santa Barbara:1996. Vol. 13, Iss. 3, p. 4-18
Grubb, E.L. and Grathwohl, H.L. (1967), "Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behaviour: a theoretical approach", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31, pp. 22-7.
Halliday, Jean (1996), "Chrysler Brings Out Brand Personalities with ’97 ads”, (Midwest region edition). Chicago: Sep 30, 1996. Vol. 67, Iss. 40; p. 3 (2 pages)
Hawkins, Best & Coney(2001), 《Consumer Behavior》, Building Marketing Strategy.
Hong, Jae W, Zinkhan, George M ,(1995)“Self-concept and advertising effectiveness: The influence of congruency, conspicuousness, and response mode.”Psychology & Marketing. New York: Vol. 12, Iss. 1; pg. 53, 25 pgs
James, W., Woodruff, B., & Werner, W. (1965). Effect of internal and external control upon changes in smoking behavior. Journal of consulting Psychology, 29( 2), 184-186.
Jospeh N. Fry,(1971)Personality Variables and Cigarette Btand Choice,Journal of Marketing Research
Keller, Kevin .Lane.(1993).“Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Consumer- Based Brand Equity,”Journal of Marketing, Jan., pp.1-22.
Levy, SJ. (1959), "Symbols for sale", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 117-24.
Malhotra, Naresh K. (1981), "A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts and Product Concepts," Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (November), 456-64.
Markus, Hazel(1977), "Self-schemata and Proccessing Information about the Self," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 35, pp. 63-78
Markus,Hazel & Elissa Wurf(1987),“The Dynamic Self-Concept: A Social Psychological Perspective”, Annual Review of Psychology , p.299-337.
McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (June), 71-84.
McCracken, G. (1987). Advertising ::Meaning or information? In Melanie Wallendorf and Paul Anderson (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, 121-124. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
McCracken, Grant (1989), "Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process," Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (3), 310-21.
McCrae, Robert R. and Paul T. Costa Jr.(1997), “Personality Traits Structure as a Human Universal”, American Psychologist, 52(May), 509-516
Mowen, J. C. and M. Minor, (2001)《Consumer Behavior》, 6th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-
Hall, Inc.,.
Murphy, J.M.(1990), Brand Strategy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
P C M Govers, J P L Schoormans (2005)“Product personality and its influence on consumer preference”,The Journal of Consumer Marketing Santa Barbara:. Vol. 22, Iss. 4/5, p. 189-197 (9 pp.)
Plummer, Joseph T.(1985), ”How Personality Makes A Difference?”,Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.24(6),p.27-31.
Plummer, Joseph T. (1985), "Brand Personality: A Strategic Concept For Multinational Advertising," in Marketing Educators` Conference. New York: Young & Rubicam, 1-31.
Pierce JP,Gilpin E,Burns DM,et al. (1991)“Does Tobacco Advertising Target Young People tj Start Smoking?Evidence From California.JAMA;266:3154-3158
Ross, Ivan(1971), "Self-Concept and Brand Choice," Journal of the University of Chicago, Vol. 44, pp. 38-50.
Sirgy, Joseph (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review, Journal of Consumer Research 9, 287-300.
Thomas Tan Tsu Wee(2004),” Extending human personality to brands: The stability factor” Journal of Brand Management London:Apr 2004. Vol. 11, Iss. 4, p. 317-330 (14 pp.)
Young,D,Swan,A.v&Melia,J,(1989)”Cigerette advertising and the youth market”,Health Education Journal,48(3)113-116
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
廣告研究所
924520091
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0924520091
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 祝鳳岡zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 倪培軒zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 倪培軒zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 16:14:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 16:14:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 16:14:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0924520091en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29751-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 廣告研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 924520091zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 一致性理論源於心理學中自我概念的延伸,其主要論點便是人會選擇與己之自我概念趨同的物、事、或人;並且極力避免與己之自我概念不同的物、事、或人互動。其道理來自於自我的穩定性及避免矛盾,自我往往讓自己處於一種習慣的狀態,並不希望改變。
     
     自Grubb and Grathwohl(1967)透過Rogers(1951)的個體自我增強理論(theory of individual self enhancement)為基礎,假設自我概念對個體而言是一種價值,並且個體的行為會朝向增強或保護他們的自我概念為方向,因此購買、展示行為或商品使用,皆會透過購買符號商品的過程來加強自我概念後,將此理論運用到廣告行銷領域的研究便開始蓬勃發展。本研究即是透過一致性理論來觀察吸菸者與其所喜好的香菸品牌間之關係,並輔以Aaker,J的品牌人格理論做為觀察面向。最後在本研究架構上將吸菸動機及吸菸行為一併納入其中討論。
     
     根據本研究對吸菸行為的觀察,認為吸菸行為是一種社會性行為,因此決定探討自我概念的三個面向,分別為真實自我、理想自我、及社會自我。自我概念及品牌人格的測量,則同時使用Aaker(1997)的品牌人格量表測之。
     
     研究結果發現:自我概念與品牌人格越趨同者,確實較自我概念與品牌人格不趨同者,會對品牌產生較好的態度。並且三個面向的自我概念在皮爾森分析下皆與品牌態度呈正相關,最後再經由迴歸分析後得知具有預測能力的變數則是理想自我。
     
     吸菸動機對品牌態度也同時具有影響力,但較理想自我概念一致性來得弱。而吸菸行為則是發現使用頻率與理想自我概念一致性有不相上下的正向影響力;而菸齡在檢測上則是發現對品牌態度呈現負向影響;最後每日吸菸量對品牌態度則是毫無影響力。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 研究動機及目的-------------------------------------01
      第一節 研究動機-------------------------------------------01
      第二節 研究目的-------------------------------------------04
     
     第二章 文獻探討-------------------------------------------05
      第一節 自我概念-------------------------------------------05
      第二節 一致性理論-----------------------------------------08
      第三節 吸菸行為影響因素-----------------------------------12
      第四節 香菸品牌之象徵意義---------------------------------16
      第五節 品牌人格-------------------------------------------19
      第六節 調節變項-------------------------------------------26
     
     第三章 研究方法-------------------------------------------28
      第一節 研究架構-------------------------------------------28
      第二節 研究假設及研究問題---------------------------------29
      第三節 研究變數之操作性定義與測量-------------------------30
      第四節 問卷設計-------------------------------------------32
      第五節 樣本選擇與抽樣方法---------------------------------33
      第六節 資料搜集方式---------------------------------------33
      第七節 分析方法-------------------------------------------34
     
     第四章 資料分析與討論-------------------------------------35
      第一節 樣本分佈狀況---------------------------------------35
      第二節 一致性主效果驗證-----------------------------------41
      第三節 吸菸動機之調節效果驗證-----------------------------48
      第四節 吸菸行為之調節效果驗證-----------------------------61
      第五節 一致性主效果再驗證---------------------------------68
      第六節 研究假設分析發現之摘要說明-------------------------71
     
     第五章 研究結論與建議-------------------------------------72
      第一節 研究結論-------------------------------------------72
      第二節 研究限制-------------------------------------------77
      第三節 研究建議-------------------------------------------78
      第四節 未來研究之方向-------------------------------------80
     
     參考文獻------------------------------------------------------83
      中文部份----------------------------------------------------83
      英文部份----------------------------------------------------83
     
     附錄
     (一)附錄一:前測問卷:香菸品牌人格量表
     (二)附錄二:吸菸動機量表
     (三)附錄三:品牌個性量表
     (四)附錄四:品牌態度量表
     (五)附錄五:吸菸行為量表
     (六)附錄六:自我個性量表
     (七)附錄七:基本資料
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0924520091en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 自我概念zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 品牌人格zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 一致性效果zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 吸菸動機zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 吸菸行為zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 吸菸者多重自我概念與品牌人格之一致性對香菸品牌態度之影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李勝祥(1989),《台北地區吸菸人口生活型態.品牌態度及消費行為之相關研究》,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳富莉,李蘭:《青少年菸品消費認同與吸菸行為之研究—以臺北縣某兩所高職學生為例》,台灣衛誌2004;23(1):59-70zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李蘭、潘怜燕(2000),〈台灣地區成年人之吸菸率與吸菸行為:八十八年度之全國性調查〉,《中華衛誌》,19-6:423-436。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李景美(1993),台北市國小、國中及高中生對菸品廣告之反應研究,《衛生報導》,3(9):40-42zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沈雲驄、湯宗勳譯(1998),《品牌行銷法則》,台北:商周。(Aaker著)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林世寅(1993),《消費價值與品牌選擇之研究 : 以香菸品牌之萬寶路與長壽為例 》,國立台灣大學商學所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林昆宏(1987),《吸菸者的生活型態與吸菸動機之研究》,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林紡而(2001),《台北地區年輕女性吸菸行為之初探性研究》,國立台灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳真瑋(1999),《品牌個性與品牌關係關聯性之研究》,國立臺灣大學商學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳政衛(2004),《汽車品牌個性、消費者自我概念投射與其購買意願程度之關聯性研究》,第十二屆中華民國廣告暨公共關係學術與實務研討會論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周桂如(2000),《吸菸之行為研究》,臺北:國家衛生研究院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐明郁(1999),《消費者自我概念與品牌個性之一致性對購買意願之影響》,成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳富莉(1997)媒體傳播訴求之分析-以吸菸議題為例,《衛生教育雜誌》,17:51-58zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳富莉(2001),《論菸品消費文化與青少年菸品消費行為 = A study on cigarette consumer culture and the youth cigarette consumption behavior》,國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳怡如(2001),《香菸廣告之接觸、認同與吸菸行為之關係 : 以北縣高職學生為例 = The relationship between the contact and identification of cigarette advertising and the students` smoking behavior in vocational high school in Taipei County》,國立臺灣大學公共衛生學院衛生政策與管理研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳俐琦(1998),《品牌個性構成向度之研究》,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳錦琦(1985),《從態度與主觀規範的因素探討國中生之抽菸意向》,國立臺灣師範大學衛生教育研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳燕鈴(2003),《台灣香菸廣告訊息內容之研究》,國立政治大學廣告學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張君玫、黃鵬仁 譯(1995),《消費》,台北:巨流。(Bocock, R.著)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭鐘隆(2003),《不吸菸與健康促進》,臺北:國家衛生研究院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊雪華(2003),《高中生的同儕關係與吸菸行為 : 社會網絡觀點 = Social network and smoking behavior of high school students》,國立臺灣大學衛生政策與管理研究所博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃恆正譯(1988),《符號社會的消費》,遠流出版社。(星野克美等著 )zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃淑貞(2000),《吸菸之流行病學研究》,臺北:國家衛生研究院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃堅厚(民88),《人格心理學》,台北:心理出版社zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 童曉君(1999),《廣告訴求、廣告代言人、自我監控程度、消費者與代言人之人格一致性對廣告效果的影響》,元智大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡文嘉(2002),《自我概念、生活型態與品牌形象對消費者購買意願之影響 : 化妝品個案研究 = The Influence of Self-Concept,Life-Style,and Brand Image on Consumers` Purchase Intention : A Case Study of Cosmetic》,國立中興大學行銷研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 趙政豪(2000),《品牌與消費者間人格自我狀態互動之研究-交流分析觀點》,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 齊家樑(1991),《商店形象/自我形象一致性與店內購買行為之研究 : 以永和市某超級市場為例》,私立東吳大學商學院管理學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭英輝,「品牌人格與產品類別對品牌延伸評價的影響」,國立中央大學企業管理 研究所碩士論文,民國87年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aaker, Jennifer L. (1999), “The Malleable Self: The Role of Self Expression in Persuasion”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol XXXVI, 45-57zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aaker, J. L.(1997), "Dimensions of Brand Personality," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34(August), pp.347-356.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aaker, J. L.(1997), "Brand Personality in Japan: Examining the Cross- Cultural Meaning of Brands Personality Dimensions," unpublished paper, UCLA Anderson Graduate School of Management.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adam P. Heath, Don Scott.(1998),” The self-concept and image congruence hypothesis An empirical evaluation in the motor vehicle market” European Journal Of Marketing Bradford:1998. Vol. 32, Iss. 11/12, p. 1110-1123zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ahmad Jamal, Mark M H Goode(2001)”Consumers and brands: A study of the impact of self-image congruence on brand preference and satisfaction”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning Bradford: 2001. Vol. 19, Iss. 6/7, p. 482-492 (11 pp.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arnett JJ, Terhanian G. (1998)Adolescents’ responses to cigarette advertisements: links between exposure, liking, and the appeal of smoking. Tobacco Control;7:129-133.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Batra, Rajeev, Donald R. Lehmann, and Dipinder Singh (1993), "The Brand Personality Component of Brand Goodwill: Some Antecedents and Consequences," in Brand Equity and Advertising, David A. Aaker and Alexander Biel, eds. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Belk, Russell W. (1988) "Possessions and the Extended Self," Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (September), 139-68zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berndt TJ and Keefe K.(1995) Friends` influence on adolescents` adjustment to school. Child Dev; 66:1312-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Botvin GJ, Goldberg CJ, Botvin EM, et al.(1993) Somking Behavior of Adolescents Exposed to Cigarette Advertising. Public Heakth Reports;108:217-224.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chang, C. (2000). The effects of personality differences on product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 26-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Claudia Lujic, Martin Reuter, Petra Netter(2004),”Psychobiological Theories of Smoking and Smoking Motivation”, European Psychologist [PsycARTICLES]. 2005.Vol.10, Iss. 1; pg. 1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) David L.Loudon,Albert J.Della Bitta,(1979),《Consumer Behavior》zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dielman, T. E., Campanell, P. C., Shope, J. I., et al. (1987). Susceptibility to peer pressure, self-esteem, and health locus of control as correlates of adolescent substance abuse. Health Education Quarterly, 14, 207-221.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Digman, J. M.(1990),”Personality Structure: Emergence of the Five-Factor Model,”Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dolich, I. J. (1969), “Congruence relationships between self image and product brands”,Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 6,No. 1, pp. 80-84 .zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eiser, J., Eiser, C., Gammage, P., & Morgan, M. (1989). Health locus of control and health beliefs in relation to adolescent smoking. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 1059-1065.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Emma N Banister, Margaret K Hogg(2004),” Negative symbolic consumption and consumers` dive for self-esteem: The case of the fashion industry”, European Journal of Marketing Bradford: 2004. Vol. 38, Iss. 7, p. 850-868zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ericksen, M. K. (1996), “Using self-congruity and ideal Congruity to predict purchase intention : a European perspective”, Journal of Euromarketing, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 41-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feighery E,Borzekowski D L.G.,Schoolar C,et al(1998).Seeing,wanting,owning:the relationship between recepifivity to tobacco marketing and smoking susceptibility in young people.Tobacco Control;7:123-128zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fischer PM, Schwartz MP, Richards JW etal(1991). Brand Logo Recognition by Children Aged 3 to 6 years: Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel. JAMA; 266(22):3415- 8.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldberg, L. R.(1990), “An Alternative Description of Personality,” The Big Five Factor Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 59, pp. 1216~1229.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Graeff, T. R.(1996), "Image Congruence Effects on Product Evaluations: The Role of Self-Monitoring and Public/Private Consumption,"Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 13(Aug), pp.481-499.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Graeff, Timothy R.(1996),” Using promotional messages to manage the effects of brand and self-image on brand evaluations” The Journal Of Consumer Marketing Santa Barbara:1996. Vol. 13, Iss. 3, p. 4-18zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grubb, E.L. and Grathwohl, H.L. (1967), "Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behaviour: a theoretical approach", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 31, pp. 22-7.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, Jean (1996), "Chrysler Brings Out Brand Personalities with ’97 ads”, (Midwest region edition). Chicago: Sep 30, 1996. Vol. 67, Iss. 40; p. 3 (2 pages)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hawkins, Best & Coney(2001), 《Consumer Behavior》, Building Marketing Strategy.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hong, Jae W, Zinkhan, George M ,(1995)“Self-concept and advertising effectiveness: The influence of congruency, conspicuousness, and response mode.”Psychology & Marketing. New York: Vol. 12, Iss. 1; pg. 53, 25 pgszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) James, W., Woodruff, B., & Werner, W. (1965). Effect of internal and external control upon changes in smoking behavior. Journal of consulting Psychology, 29( 2), 184-186.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jospeh N. Fry,(1971)Personality Variables and Cigarette Btand Choice,Journal of Marketing Researchzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keller, Kevin .Lane.(1993).“Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Consumer- Based Brand Equity,”Journal of Marketing, Jan., pp.1-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levy, SJ. (1959), "Symbols for sale", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp. 117-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Malhotra, Naresh K. (1981), "A Scale to Measure Self-Concepts, Person Concepts and Product Concepts," Journal of Marketing Research, 23 (November), 456-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Markus, Hazel(1977), "Self-schemata and Proccessing Information about the Self," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 35, pp. 63-78zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Markus,Hazel & Elissa Wurf(1987),“The Dynamic Self-Concept: A Social Psychological Perspective”, Annual Review of Psychology , p.299-337.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCracken, G. (1986). Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research, 13 (June), 71-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCracken, G. (1987). Advertising ::Meaning or information? In Melanie Wallendorf and Paul Anderson (Eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, 121-124. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCracken, Grant (1989), "Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process," Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (3), 310-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCrae, Robert R. and Paul T. Costa Jr.(1997), “Personality Traits Structure as a Human Universal”, American Psychologist, 52(May), 509-516zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mowen, J. C. and M. Minor, (2001)《Consumer Behavior》, 6th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hall, Inc.,.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Murphy, J.M.(1990), Brand Strategy, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) P C M Govers, J P L Schoormans (2005)“Product personality and its influence on consumer preference”,The Journal of Consumer Marketing Santa Barbara:. Vol. 22, Iss. 4/5, p. 189-197 (9 pp.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Plummer, Joseph T.(1985), ”How Personality Makes A Difference?”,Journal of Advertising Research, Vol.24(6),p.27-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Plummer, Joseph T. (1985), "Brand Personality: A Strategic Concept For Multinational Advertising," in Marketing Educators` Conference. New York: Young & Rubicam, 1-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pierce JP,Gilpin E,Burns DM,et al. (1991)“Does Tobacco Advertising Target Young People tj Start Smoking?Evidence From California.JAMA;266:3154-3158zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ross, Ivan(1971), "Self-Concept and Brand Choice," Journal of the University of Chicago, Vol. 44, pp. 38-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sirgy, Joseph (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review, Journal of Consumer Research 9, 287-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thomas Tan Tsu Wee(2004),” Extending human personality to brands: The stability factor” Journal of Brand Management London:Apr 2004. Vol. 11, Iss. 4, p. 317-330 (14 pp.)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Young,D,Swan,A.v&Melia,J,(1989)”Cigerette advertising and the youth market”,Health Education Journal,48(3)113-116zh_TW