學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 公營銀行民營化經營績效之研究
The Operating Performance Research of State-owned Banks` Privatization
作者 洪偉洲
Hung,Wei-Chou
貢獻者 周文賢<br>黃國峯
洪偉洲
Hung,Wei-Chou
關鍵詞 公營銀行
民營化
經營績效
銀行經營原則
結構方程式模式
日期 2005
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 16:45:33 (UTC+8)
摘要 近年來,銀行業面臨過度競爭的困境,銀行家數過多使得業者紛紛採用價格競爭的方式來搶攻市場。加上普遍缺乏金融創新的能力,服務與產品趨向同質化,更使該產業處於競爭激烈的環境。政府為了提升公營銀行的經營績效,遂以民營化作為提升競爭力的方法,民營化後是否能夠有效提升績效,來解決效率不彰的問題,是個值得深入探究的議題。
     本研究即探討公營銀行民營化前後經營績效的差異。從銀行經營的五大原則,安全性、經營能力、流動性、獲利性和成長性等五個財務因素切入,運用結構方程式模式探討因素間的關係,再進一步研究15項財務指標在民營化前後之差異。研究發現,安全性與成長性會顯著地正向影響獲利性,而經營能力也會顯著地正向影響成長性。表示銀行的管理者想要維持獲利能力,必須同時兼顧業務成長與風險的控管。
     此外,在民營化之後顯著改善的財務指標有三個,分別為股東權益比率、流動比率與速動比率。顯著衰退的則有八個,分別為固定資產轉率、淨值週轉率、總資產週轉率、資產報酬率、淨值報酬率、純益率、淨值成長率與營收成長率等。因此,公營銀行在民營化之後,顯著改善了安全性與流動性指標,雖然加強了風險控管,但是在經營能力、獲利性與成長性指標中卻呈現顯著衰退現象。顯示民營化對於公營銀行競爭力的提升,在研究期間內成效並不如預期。
     
     
     關鍵字:公營銀行、民營化、經營績效、銀行經營原則、結構方程式模式
In recent years, there are many difficulties in the Taiwanese banking industry, especially the over-banking problem. Every bank uses the price competition to broaden its market share because they have no innovative ability to create new products and services. In order to solve this problem, Taiwanese government regarded privatization as the best way to improve state-owned banks’ operating performance. This issue has also become a very popular subject of studies.
     This study investigated the difference of operating performance between pre-privatization and post-privatization. It discussed and examined the relationship among Safety, Activity, Liquidity, Profitability and Growth. Based on the results, Profitability is directly affected by Safety and Growth. In addition, Growth is also directly affected by Activity. So, if managers of a bank want to make profit continuously, they have to care about not only sales growth but also risk management.
     After privatization, there are three increasing indicators, including equity ratio, current ratio and quick ratio. However, there are still eight decreasing ones, inclusive of fixed asset turnover ratio, equity turnover ratio, total asset turnover ratio, return on asset (ROA), return on equity (ROE), profit margin on sales, equity growth rate and sales growth rate. As a result, privatization is probably not the best solution to improve the operating performance of state-owned banks.
     
     Key words: state-owned banks, privatization, operating performance
參考文獻 中文部份
(1)李佳珍(1999),台灣地區銀行經營績效評等之分析-以本國銀行與外商
銀行為例,嘉義技術學院學報,第67卷,頁79-96。
(2)吳文弘(2000),公營事業民營化-提升事業經營績效之利器,華泰書局。
(3)吳炳松(2001),「台灣銀行業經濟效率與市場效率之實證研究」,朝陽科
技大學財務金融系碩士論文。
(4)周文賢(2002),多變量統計分析-SAS/STAT使用方法,初版,台北:智
勝。
(5)周夢柏(2002),「應用財務比率分析我國商業銀行獲利能力之實證研
究」,朝陽科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。
(6)洪國賜、盧聯生(2002),財務報表分析,四版,台北:三民。
Banking and Finance, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 495-509.
(13)Nakane, M., and Weintraub, D. (2005), “Bank
privatization and productivity: Evidence for Brazil”,
Journal of Banking and Finance Vol. 29
(7)陳明充(1986),商業銀行業務內容及其經營原則,中國會計期刊,第33
卷,第九期,第27頁。
(8)陳士雄(2001),「國營銀行轉型民營化後之經營發展策略-以交通銀行為
例」,國立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程專班碩士論文。
(9)陳俊銘(2003),「全球銀行財務危機與風險管理之研究—以Panel Data
模型為實證」,中原大學企管所碩士論文。
(10)陳佳怡(2003),「金融控股公司績效之探討-財務面因素評估研究」,
國立中山大學未出版碩士論文。
(11)陳隆麒(2004),當代財務管理,二版,台北:華泰。
(12)許振明(2001),「由金融自由化與國際化的過程談金融監理」,國家政
策研究基金會,國家政策論壇,第一卷第八期,頁47-56。
(13)許振明、劉完淳(2002),「近兩年我國銀行的財務績效評估」,中央存
款保險股份有限公司,存款保險資訊季刊,第16卷第一期,頁28-43。
(14)黃德舜(1998),企業財務分析-企業價值的創造與評估,初版,台北:
華泰。
(15)黃財源(1998),「臺灣公營事業民營化之理論與現況」,研考雙月刊,
行政院研會,頁58-67。
(16)黃文明(2004),「以財務比率探討台灣地區公民營銀行之經營績效」,
國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
(17)彭美玲(2005),「本國銀行經營績效之實證研究」,商管科技季刊,第
六卷第一期,頁137-163。
(18)張清山(2002),「資本適足率管制對銀行風險與財務績效關聯性之影
響」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
(19)張嗣聰(2004),「以DEA法探討我國金控公司行銷面與財務面經營效
率」,中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
(20)童宗傑(2001),「台灣地區新銀行經營績效比較分析-資料包絡分析法
之應用」,中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
(21)萬哲鈺、高崇瑋(2001),財務報表分析-實務與應用,初版,台北:華
泰。
(22)劉常勇(2002),「東德的國營事業民營化的經驗,公有企業改革與民
營,段樵、伍鳳儀、劉常勇編」,香港:中文大學出版社,頁51-55。
(23)劉添寧(2002),「公營事業民營化之研究—從日本經驗看台灣問題,公
有企業改革與民營,段樵、伍鳳儀、劉常勇」香港:中文大學出版社,頁
71-107。
(24)蔡信夫與洪碧霞(1994),「本國銀行營業單位經營績效與服務品質之實
證研究」,管理與系統期刊,第一卷第一期,頁89-104。
(25)賴光二(2001),「公營事業推動民營化之研究-以高雄銀行為例」,國
立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程專班碩士論文。
(26)應園園(2002),「公營事業民營化之績效研究-華南商業銀行」,國立
高雄第一科技大學財務管理系碩士論文。
英文部份
(1)Bhattacharya, A., C.A. K. Lovell and P. Sahay(1997),
“The Impact of Liberalization on the Productive
Efficiency of Indian Commercial Banks”, European
Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 98, pp. 332-345.
(2)Beck, T., Levine, R. (2002), “Industry growth and
capital location: Does having a market or bank-based
system matter?”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.
64, pp. 147-180.
(3)Berger, A. N., Hasan, I., and Klapper, L.F.(2004),
“Further evidence on the link between finance and growth:
An international analysis of community banking and
economic performance”, Journal of Financial Services
Research Vol. 25, pp. 169-202.
(4)Bonin, J. P., Hasan, I., and Wachtel, P. (2005), “Bank
privatization and performance: Evidence from transition
countries”, Journal of Banking and Finance Vol. 29
(5)Cook, P. and Kirkpatrick C. (1998), “Privatization,
employment and social protection in developing
countries”,Privatization Enterprise Development and
Economic Reform.UK:Cheltenham.
(6)Coşkun Can Aktan (2003), “An Introduction Theory of
Privatization”, The Journal of Social, Political and
Economic Studies, Vol. 20, No.2, pp. 187-217.
(7)Clarke, G., Cull, R., and Shirley, M. (2005), “Bank
privatization in developing countries: A summary of
lessons and findings”, Journal of Banking and Finance
Vol. 29.
(8)Juliet D`Souza, Willaim L. Megginson and Robert C. Nash
(2001), “Determinants of Performance Improvements in
Privatized Firms: The Role of Restructuring and
Corporate Governance”, American Finance Association
2001 New Orleans Meetings
(9)La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and
Vishny, R. (2000), “Investor protection and corporate
governance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 58,
pp. 3-27.
(10)La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A.
(2001), “Government ownership of commercial banks”,
Journal of Finance, Vol. 57, pp. 265–301.
(11)Megginson, W. L., Nash, R.C. and Randenborgh, M.V.
(1994), “The Financial and Operating Performance of
Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical
Analysis”, The Journal of Finance Vol.64, No.2, pp. 403-
452
(12)Miller, S. M. and A.G. Noulas (1996), “The technical
efficiency of large bank production”, Journal of
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
企業管理研究所
93355006
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355006
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 周文賢<br>黃國峯zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 洪偉洲zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hung,Wei-Chouen_US
dc.creator (作者) 洪偉洲zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hung,Wei-Chouen_US
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 16:45:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 16:45:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 16:45:33 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093355006en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29865-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 企業管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93355006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 近年來,銀行業面臨過度競爭的困境,銀行家數過多使得業者紛紛採用價格競爭的方式來搶攻市場。加上普遍缺乏金融創新的能力,服務與產品趨向同質化,更使該產業處於競爭激烈的環境。政府為了提升公營銀行的經營績效,遂以民營化作為提升競爭力的方法,民營化後是否能夠有效提升績效,來解決效率不彰的問題,是個值得深入探究的議題。
     本研究即探討公營銀行民營化前後經營績效的差異。從銀行經營的五大原則,安全性、經營能力、流動性、獲利性和成長性等五個財務因素切入,運用結構方程式模式探討因素間的關係,再進一步研究15項財務指標在民營化前後之差異。研究發現,安全性與成長性會顯著地正向影響獲利性,而經營能力也會顯著地正向影響成長性。表示銀行的管理者想要維持獲利能力,必須同時兼顧業務成長與風險的控管。
     此外,在民營化之後顯著改善的財務指標有三個,分別為股東權益比率、流動比率與速動比率。顯著衰退的則有八個,分別為固定資產轉率、淨值週轉率、總資產週轉率、資產報酬率、淨值報酬率、純益率、淨值成長率與營收成長率等。因此,公營銀行在民營化之後,顯著改善了安全性與流動性指標,雖然加強了風險控管,但是在經營能力、獲利性與成長性指標中卻呈現顯著衰退現象。顯示民營化對於公營銀行競爭力的提升,在研究期間內成效並不如預期。
     
     
     關鍵字:公營銀行、民營化、經營績效、銀行經營原則、結構方程式模式
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) In recent years, there are many difficulties in the Taiwanese banking industry, especially the over-banking problem. Every bank uses the price competition to broaden its market share because they have no innovative ability to create new products and services. In order to solve this problem, Taiwanese government regarded privatization as the best way to improve state-owned banks’ operating performance. This issue has also become a very popular subject of studies.
     This study investigated the difference of operating performance between pre-privatization and post-privatization. It discussed and examined the relationship among Safety, Activity, Liquidity, Profitability and Growth. Based on the results, Profitability is directly affected by Safety and Growth. In addition, Growth is also directly affected by Activity. So, if managers of a bank want to make profit continuously, they have to care about not only sales growth but also risk management.
     After privatization, there are three increasing indicators, including equity ratio, current ratio and quick ratio. However, there are still eight decreasing ones, inclusive of fixed asset turnover ratio, equity turnover ratio, total asset turnover ratio, return on asset (ROA), return on equity (ROE), profit margin on sales, equity growth rate and sales growth rate. As a result, privatization is probably not the best solution to improve the operating performance of state-owned banks.
     
     Key words: state-owned banks, privatization, operating performance
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目次.......................................................I
     表次.....................................................III
     圖次......................................................IV
     第一章 緒論................................................1
      1.1研究背景.............................................1
      1.2研究動機.............................................2
      1.3研究目的.............................................2
      1.4研究範圍.............................................3
      1.5章節結構.............................................3
     第二章 文獻回顧.............................................5
      2.1民營化定義...........................................5
      2.2銀行民營化目的........................................7
      2.3銀行經營績效評估......................................9
     第三章 研究方法............................................15
      3.1研究架構............................................15
      3.2變數操作性定義與衡量方式..............................16
      3.3統計模式............................................21
      3.4研究假說............................................32
      3.5資料收集方法.........................................38
     第四章 實證分析............................................39
      4.1樣本輪廓分析.........................................39
      4.2模式辨認.............................................47
      4.3模式評估.............................................48
      4.4模式參數估計.........................................49
      4.5假說檢定.............................................51
      4.6小結................................................57第五章 結論與建議...........................................59
      5.1研究發現.............................................59
      5.2策略涵意.............................................60
      5.3研究貢獻.............................................61
      5.4研究限制.............................................62
      5.5後續研究議...........................................62
     參考文獻...................................................64
      中文部分................................................64
      英文部分................................................66
     
     表次
     
     表 3.2-1 研究變數計算公式...................................17
     表 3.3-1 結構方程式模式變數定義..............................23
     表 3.3-2 結構方程式模式資料格式..............................25
     表 3.3-3 模式辨認結果......................................31
     表 3.3-4 總檢定決策法則.....................................31
     表 3.3-5 配適度指標........................................32
     表 3.3-6 模式修正..........................................32
     表 3.4-1 研究假說..........................................33
     表 3.5-1 樣本選取..........................................38
     表 4.1-1 10年財務指標資料分析...............................40
     表 4.1-2 民營化前後財務資料分析..............................44
     表 4.2-1 結構方程式模式未知參數..............................48
     表 4.3-1 結構方程式模式配適度評估............................49
     表 4.4-1 因素負荷量........................................51
     表 4.5-1 五大財務因素相關性檢定..............................52
     表 4.5-2 民營化前後經營績效檢定..............................54
     
     圖次
     
     圖 3.1-1 觀念性架構........................................15
     圖 3.3-1 變數之線性結構關係.................................22
     圖 4.4-1 結構方程式模式參數估計計............................50
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093355006en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公營銀行zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民營化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 經營績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 銀行經營原則zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 結構方程式模式zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 公營銀行民營化經營績效之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Operating Performance Research of State-owned Banks` Privatizationen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1)李佳珍(1999),台灣地區銀行經營績效評等之分析-以本國銀行與外商zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 銀行為例,嘉義技術學院學報,第67卷,頁79-96。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (2)吳文弘(2000),公營事業民營化-提升事業經營績效之利器,華泰書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (3)吳炳松(2001),「台灣銀行業經濟效率與市場效率之實證研究」,朝陽科zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 技大學財務金融系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (4)周文賢(2002),多變量統計分析-SAS/STAT使用方法,初版,台北:智zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 勝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (5)周夢柏(2002),「應用財務比率分析我國商業銀行獲利能力之實證研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 究」,朝陽科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (6)洪國賜、盧聯生(2002),財務報表分析,四版,台北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Banking and Finance, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 495-509.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (13)Nakane, M., and Weintraub, D. (2005), “Bankzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) privatization and productivity: Evidence for Brazil”,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Banking and Finance Vol. 29zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (7)陳明充(1986),商業銀行業務內容及其經營原則,中國會計期刊,第33zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 卷,第九期,第27頁。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (8)陳士雄(2001),「國營銀行轉型民營化後之經營發展策略-以交通銀行為zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 例」,國立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程專班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (9)陳俊銘(2003),「全球銀行財務危機與風險管理之研究—以Panel Datazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 模型為實證」,中原大學企管所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (10)陳佳怡(2003),「金融控股公司績效之探討-財務面因素評估研究」,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 國立中山大學未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (11)陳隆麒(2004),當代財務管理,二版,台北:華泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (12)許振明(2001),「由金融自由化與國際化的過程談金融監理」,國家政zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 策研究基金會,國家政策論壇,第一卷第八期,頁47-56。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (13)許振明、劉完淳(2002),「近兩年我國銀行的財務績效評估」,中央存zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 款保險股份有限公司,存款保險資訊季刊,第16卷第一期,頁28-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (14)黃德舜(1998),企業財務分析-企業價值的創造與評估,初版,台北:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 華泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (15)黃財源(1998),「臺灣公營事業民營化之理論與現況」,研考雙月刊,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院研會,頁58-67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (16)黃文明(2004),「以財務比率探討台灣地區公民營銀行之經營績效」,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (17)彭美玲(2005),「本國銀行經營績效之實證研究」,商管科技季刊,第zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 六卷第一期,頁137-163。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (18)張清山(2002),「資本適足率管制對銀行風險與財務績效關聯性之影zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 響」,輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (19)張嗣聰(2004),「以DEA法探討我國金控公司行銷面與財務面經營效zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 率」,中正大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (20)童宗傑(2001),「台灣地區新銀行經營績效比較分析-資料包絡分析法zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 之應用」,中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (21)萬哲鈺、高崇瑋(2001),財務報表分析-實務與應用,初版,台北:華zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (22)劉常勇(2002),「東德的國營事業民營化的經驗,公有企業改革與民zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 營,段樵、伍鳳儀、劉常勇編」,香港:中文大學出版社,頁51-55。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (23)劉添寧(2002),「公營事業民營化之研究—從日本經驗看台灣問題,公zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 有企業改革與民營,段樵、伍鳳儀、劉常勇」香港:中文大學出版社,頁zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 71-107。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (24)蔡信夫與洪碧霞(1994),「本國銀行營業單位經營績效與服務品質之實zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 證研究」,管理與系統期刊,第一卷第一期,頁89-104。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (25)賴光二(2001),「公營事業推動民營化之研究-以高雄銀行為例」,國zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 立中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程專班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (26)應園園(2002),「公營事業民營化之績效研究-華南商業銀行」,國立zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高雄第一科技大學財務管理系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1)Bhattacharya, A., C.A. K. Lovell and P. Sahay(1997),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “The Impact of Liberalization on the Productivezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Efficiency of Indian Commercial Banks”, Europeanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 98, pp. 332-345.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (2)Beck, T., Levine, R. (2002), “Industry growth andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) capital location: Does having a market or bank-basedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) system matter?”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 64, pp. 147-180.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (3)Berger, A. N., Hasan, I., and Klapper, L.F.(2004),zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Further evidence on the link between finance and growth:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) An international analysis of community banking andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) economic performance”, Journal of Financial Serviceszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Research Vol. 25, pp. 169-202.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (4)Bonin, J. P., Hasan, I., and Wachtel, P. (2005), “Bankzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) privatization and performance: Evidence from transitionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) countries”, Journal of Banking and Finance Vol. 29zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (5)Cook, P. and Kirkpatrick C. (1998), “Privatization,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) employment and social protection in developingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) countries”,Privatization Enterprise Development andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economic Reform.UK:Cheltenham.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (6)Coşkun Can Aktan (2003), “An Introduction Theory ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Privatization”, The Journal of Social, Political andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Economic Studies, Vol. 20, No.2, pp. 187-217.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (7)Clarke, G., Cull, R., and Shirley, M. (2005), “Bankzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) privatization in developing countries: A summary ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) lessons and findings”, Journal of Banking and Financezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vol. 29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (8)Juliet D`Souza, Willaim L. Megginson and Robert C. Nashzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (2001), “Determinants of Performance Improvements inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Privatized Firms: The Role of Restructuring andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Corporate Governance”, American Finance Associationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001 New Orleans Meetingszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (9)La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vishny, R. (2000), “Investor protection and corporatezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) governance”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 58,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) pp. 3-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (10)La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (2001), “Government ownership of commercial banks”,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Journal of Finance, Vol. 57, pp. 265–301.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (11)Megginson, W. L., Nash, R.C. and Randenborgh, M.V.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (1994), “The Financial and Operating Performance ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empiricalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Analysis”, The Journal of Finance Vol.64, No.2, pp. 403-zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 452zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (12)Miller, S. M. and A.G. Noulas (1996), “The technicalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) efficiency of large bank production”, Journal ofzh_TW