Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 電信競爭與專利策略之研究
A Study on Telecom Competition and Patent Strategy
作者 方修忠
貢獻者 林柏生
方修忠
關鍵詞 電信
產業鏈
專利
策略
專利策略
專利分析
Telecom
Value chain
Patent
Strategy
Patent strategy
Patent analysis
日期 2005
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:05:47 (UTC+8)
摘要 專注於科技創新並將之轉化為智慧財產權的應用,可說是通訊產業競爭的關鍵因素;專利不但是通訊科技演變與進步的註腳,也相當程度地解釋了為什麼Ericsson與Nokia之所以屹立不搖,為何Qualcomm得以崛起,為何Ericsson與Sony要合資成立索尼愛立信,又為何NTT DoCoMo的i-mode得以成為今日全世界最成功的無線上網服務,而Lucent與Siemens又為什麼無奈地逐漸淡出市場?答案就是科技的創新與管理!
     
     本研究試圖在既有的競爭與策略的理論上,以專利為核心,來探討電信事業如何在飽和的行動通訊市場,透過專利的取得,獲致先進的技術,進入新市場,以強化自身競爭優勢;進而藉由授權及執行之策略運用,佈建專利保護網,排除競爭對手進入市場;同時利用專利創造公司財富、提高股東價值,並可作為併購、合資等談判籌碼,以達到產業控制等目的。
     
     因此,本論文即在探討電信事業如何運用專利策略,以創造績效,項目如下:
     一、探討電信事業的專利現況並做案例分析。
     二、探討電信事業如何運用其專利,並結合運用國內、外專利策略的理論。
     三、訪談電信事業經理人,探討專利如何從行銷、技術與法律面達成公司目標。
     四、探討電信事業如何利用專利作為談判籌碼,以便在各種交易中取得優勢。
     
     本文以圖表方式呈現台灣五個主要電信事業的專利現況,先依據各業者申請中華民國、美國以及中華人民共合國之專利項目與數量,比較何者擁有最多專利權;進而探討其是否也相對的具有最強的競爭優勢。並以實際案例呈現台灣主要電信事業發生之專利糾紛,及其如何研擬與執行專利策略,並與理論作如何之結合。
     
      從本研究之實際案例與專利策略模型得之,企業應該在平時就體認專利不只是技術部門或法律部門的業務,公司高階主管更要認知專利策略與公司的行銷策略或財務目標是緊密結合的。尤其應該要求專業經理人將專利資產視為「企業家精神」的一環來重視與培養,如此一來,專利策略的成本效益就得以自然顯現,並與公司的行銷策略與營運目標相互結合。
     
     關鍵字:電信、產業鏈、專利、策略、專利策略、專利分析
Focusing on innovation and make it a strategy of IPR is one of the sustainable factors of telecom operation in such a fierce competition. Why Nokia and Ericsson keep their competitiveness ? Why NTT DoCoMo and its i-mode are so successful ? Why Lucent and Siemens both fall behind from their telecom competitors ? The same reason in common is technology innovation and management.
     
     Patent strategy primarily includes 3 parts,which are obtaining patent rights, creating patent value, and enforcing them. Patent strategy should run with Marketing strategy so as to apply patents as an isolating mechanism to deterrent other competitors, and to leverage patents to maximize income or using patents as bargaining chips to strengthen companys’ position in dealing with the third parties, as well as to defend themselves against patents owned by others. As a result, patent decisions become sources of dynamic capabilities in the never ended competition.
     
     In this paper, 2 qualitative analysis researches are presented. First, there are several patent award lists of Taiwan’s three major mobile companies breaking down by ROC, USA and PRC respectively. Secondly, 5 in-depth interviews with 4 high rank managers of Fareastone and it patent law firm were made to show how FET perform it patent strategy against a service product made by another mobile company and software company.
     This thesis is to provide telecom companies with a successful case study in formulating a patent strategy and expects to raise the suggestion for managers in telecom industries regarding the strategic importance of patents and patents management should be part of the “Entrepreneurship”.
     
     Keywords: Telecom, value chain, Patent, Strategy, Patent strategy, Patent analysis
參考文獻 一、中文部分(依筆劃順序)
1.毛治國,民95,「後語音時代,就是個人化時代」,數位時代,企業M化專刊,2月8日。
2.王世堯、王世仁,民91,「專利策略」,智慧財產權管理季刊,12 月號。
3.司徒達賢,民90,「策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法」,台北:智勝文化出版。
4.朱敬一、林全,民91,「經濟學的視野」,台北:聯經出版。
5.吳思華,民87,「策略九說」,台北:臉譜文化出版。
6.何愛文,民91,「論專利制度與競爭法制之關係-從保護專利權之正當性談起」,國立台灣大學法律學研究所博士論文。
7.邱志聖,民90,「策略行銷分析:架構與實務應用」,台北:智勝文化出版。
8. 林希展,民95,「Mobile Life History 行動生活的關鍵時刻」,數位時代,企業M化專刊,2月8日。
9.周皇志等人,民93,「美國專利濫用之研究─從ITC Philips CD-RW 光碟片授權案談起」,經濟部「科技背景跨領域高級人才計畫」九十三年海外培訓成果發表會論文集。
10.林柳君譯,凱文瑞維特、大衛克萊特著,民89,「閣樓上的林布蘭」,台北:經典傳訊文化出版。
11.范曉玲,民93,「熱門的台灣專利假處分戰爭」,專利訴訟致勝之道我國及美國專利訴訟實務研討會。
12.高希均、林祖嘉,民91,「經濟學的世界(上、中、下篇)」,台北:天下遠見出版。
13.徐源豐譯,大衛傅利曼著,民91,「經濟學與法律的對話」,台北:先覺出版。
14.財團法人資訊工業策進會,民92,「我國寬頻服務產業之結構分析與研究」。
15.陳慶瀚,民95,「智慧產權與專利策略」,義首大學電機系網站, http://ccy.dd.ncu.edu.tw/~chen/course/Entrepreneur/2006-05-17%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E7%94%A2%E6%AC%8A%E8%88%87%E5%B0%88%E5%88%A9%E7%AD%96%E7%95%A5.pdf 5月17日。
16.陳怡之、王泓翔,民93,「專利分析應用於專利策略選擇之探索性研究」,http://www.orstw.org.tw/Conference2004/K/187.pdf 第一屆台灣作業研究學會學術研討會。
17.陳明達,民93,「策略行銷4C成本之影響-以台灣第三代行動通訊設備供應為例」,國立政治大學經營管理碩士論文。
18.陳思慈,民87,「台灣資訊科技產業之專利管理策略研究」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
19.陳賜賢等人,民91,「金字塔模型的專利模型創造─以高科技電子公司為例」,經濟部「培訓科技背景跨領域高級人才計畫」九十一年海外培訓成果發表會論文集。
20.郭雨嵐,民93,「台灣專利訴訟:贏的策略與實務」,專利訴訟致勝之道我國及美國專利訴訟實務研討會。
21.黃秀媛譯,金偉燦、莫伯尼著,民94,「藍海策略」,台北:天下遠見出版。
22.曾維茂,民94,「高科技產業專利策略之探討」,國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。
23.馮震宇,民93,「運用專利策略掌握競爭優勢」,能力雜誌,9 月號:頁62-69。
24.馮震宇,民92,「創新研發與專利策略」,能力雜誌,7 月號:頁70-76。
25.湯明哲,民92,「策略精論:基礎篇」,台北:天下遠見出版。
26.張安之「電子商務之商業方法專利」,彭心儀主編,民91,美國資訊通信法案例評析,頁213~234,台北:元照出版。
27.電信國家型科技計畫辦公室、台灣電信產業發展協會,民95,「電信科技與產業發展」,新竹:國立暨南國際大學出版。
28.楊光華,民90,「服務貿易總協定與我國入會承諾」,月旦法學雜誌No.79,台北:元照出版。
29.楊振富、潘勛譯,湯馬斯佛里曼著,民94,「世界是平的」,台北:雅言文化出版。
30.劉孔中、方修忠,民94,「台灣電信法律實務與案例深度解析」,台北:書泉出版。
31.劉孔中,民92,「公平交易法」,台北:元照出版。
32.劉尚志、陳佳麟,民90,「電子商務與電腦軟體之專利保護:發展、分析、創新與策略」,台北:翰蘆圖書出版。
33.劉尚志、陳佳麟,民90,「專利策略管理與運用(下)」,能力雜誌,1 月號。
34.劉尚志、陳佳麟,民89,「專利策略管理與運用(上)」,能力雜誌,12 月號。
35.劉瑞復,2000,「經濟法學原理」,北京:北京大學出版。
36.劉江彬、黃俊英,民93,「智慧財產管理總論」,台北:華泰文化出版。
37.賴柏洲、戚瑞國譯,喬治吉爾德著,「電訊狂潮」,民91,台北:先覺出版。
38.鄭洵錚、李美芳,民95,「Mobile Me 20種提案:行動創意來臨!」Mobile Business 行動企業家,第19期。(http://enterprise.fetnet.net)
39.謝穎青,民94,「通訊科技與法律的對話」,台北:天下遠見出版。
二、英文部分(依字母順序)
1.Arora A. and A. Fosfuri. 2003, Licensing the market for technology, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.52, pp277-295
2.Bruce & James D. Wood. 2002. Positioning IP for shareholder value. Managing Intellectual Property, Issue 117:41-47.
3.Barney, Jay B. & Ouchi, William G., Organizational Economics, Jossey-Bass Publishers 1988.
4.Bednarek, Michael D. 1994. Global Patent Strategy. Managing Intellectual Property, Nov 1994; 9, 44; ABI/INFORM Global.
5.Carey Jordan and Tom Morrow. 2004. Top 10 Patent Drafting Mistakes That Can Impact Litigation. Law Journal Newsletters: Patent Strategy & Management, Volume 5, Number 4.
6.Deepak Somaya. 2002. Theoretical Perspectives on Patent Strategy. Working paper, R. H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland.
7.DENNIS K. BERMAN in New York and JASON SINGER and CASSELL BRYAN-LOW in London:Nokia, Siemens Agree to Combine Equipment Units, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, June 19, 2006 3:15 a.m.
8.Deepak Somaya. 2003. Strategic Determinants of Decisions Not to Settle Patent Litigation. Strategic Management Journal. Strat. Mgmt. J., 24: 17–38
9.James Bessen. 2003. Patent Thickets: Strategic Patenting of Complex Technologies. Working Paper Research on Innovation; Boston University - School of Law.
10.John T. McNelis. A Powerful Patent Strategy Provisionally. Silicon Valley, California: FENWICK&WEST LLP. July, 2002.
11.Kazuyuki Motohashi. April, 2006. Licensing or Not Licensing?: Empirical Analysis on Strategy Use of Patent in Japanese Firms, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-E-021.
12.Knight H. Jackson. 2001. Patent Strategy for Researchers and Research Managers (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
13.Lee Davis and Kirsten Kjær. 2003. Patent Strategies of Small Danish High-Tech Firms. Proposal for a paper for the DRUID Summer Conference 2002 on Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge Copenhagen, Denmark. Proposal for a paper for American Law & Economics Association Annual Meeting.
14.Lester C. Thurow. 1999. Building Wealth-the New Rules for Individuals, Companies and Nations in a Knowledge-based Economy. Andrew Hurnberg Association LTD.
15.Miele Anthony. 2001. Patent Strategy-The Manager’s Guide to Profiting form Patent Portfolios. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
16.Michael E. Porter, Competitive Advantage, Free Press, 1985.
17.Michael E. Porter, Competitive Strategy, Free Press, 1980.
18.Rajiv P.Patel, 2004. Developing a Patent Strategy: A Checklist for getting started. Silicon Valley, California: FENWICK&WEST LLP.
19.Robert J. Walters and Charles J. Hawkins. 2004. The Courts Proper Role in Construing the Claim of a Design Patent: Should a Picture Be Worth a Thousand Words? Law Journal Newsletters: Patent Strategy & Management, Volume 5, Number 1.
20.Robert M. Grant. 2002. Contemporary Strategy Analysis (4th edition). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
21.Rivette, Kevin G & David Kline. 2000. Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents. Boston, Mass: Harvard University Press.
22.Steve Rosenbush. Nokia, Siemens Point the Way. Business Week, JUNE 20, 2006.
23.Shumaker & Sieffert. 2002. Patent Filing Strategy. (http://www.uiowa.edu/~c091324a/background%20reading1.pdf)
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
91932123
94
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091932123
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林柏生zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 方修忠zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 方修忠zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:05:47 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:05:47 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:05:47 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0091932123en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30030-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91932123zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 專注於科技創新並將之轉化為智慧財產權的應用,可說是通訊產業競爭的關鍵因素;專利不但是通訊科技演變與進步的註腳,也相當程度地解釋了為什麼Ericsson與Nokia之所以屹立不搖,為何Qualcomm得以崛起,為何Ericsson與Sony要合資成立索尼愛立信,又為何NTT DoCoMo的i-mode得以成為今日全世界最成功的無線上網服務,而Lucent與Siemens又為什麼無奈地逐漸淡出市場?答案就是科技的創新與管理!
     
     本研究試圖在既有的競爭與策略的理論上,以專利為核心,來探討電信事業如何在飽和的行動通訊市場,透過專利的取得,獲致先進的技術,進入新市場,以強化自身競爭優勢;進而藉由授權及執行之策略運用,佈建專利保護網,排除競爭對手進入市場;同時利用專利創造公司財富、提高股東價值,並可作為併購、合資等談判籌碼,以達到產業控制等目的。
     
     因此,本論文即在探討電信事業如何運用專利策略,以創造績效,項目如下:
     一、探討電信事業的專利現況並做案例分析。
     二、探討電信事業如何運用其專利,並結合運用國內、外專利策略的理論。
     三、訪談電信事業經理人,探討專利如何從行銷、技術與法律面達成公司目標。
     四、探討電信事業如何利用專利作為談判籌碼,以便在各種交易中取得優勢。
     
     本文以圖表方式呈現台灣五個主要電信事業的專利現況,先依據各業者申請中華民國、美國以及中華人民共合國之專利項目與數量,比較何者擁有最多專利權;進而探討其是否也相對的具有最強的競爭優勢。並以實際案例呈現台灣主要電信事業發生之專利糾紛,及其如何研擬與執行專利策略,並與理論作如何之結合。
     
      從本研究之實際案例與專利策略模型得之,企業應該在平時就體認專利不只是技術部門或法律部門的業務,公司高階主管更要認知專利策略與公司的行銷策略或財務目標是緊密結合的。尤其應該要求專業經理人將專利資產視為「企業家精神」的一環來重視與培養,如此一來,專利策略的成本效益就得以自然顯現,並與公司的行銷策略與營運目標相互結合。
     
     關鍵字:電信、產業鏈、專利、策略、專利策略、專利分析
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Focusing on innovation and make it a strategy of IPR is one of the sustainable factors of telecom operation in such a fierce competition. Why Nokia and Ericsson keep their competitiveness ? Why NTT DoCoMo and its i-mode are so successful ? Why Lucent and Siemens both fall behind from their telecom competitors ? The same reason in common is technology innovation and management.
     
     Patent strategy primarily includes 3 parts,which are obtaining patent rights, creating patent value, and enforcing them. Patent strategy should run with Marketing strategy so as to apply patents as an isolating mechanism to deterrent other competitors, and to leverage patents to maximize income or using patents as bargaining chips to strengthen companys’ position in dealing with the third parties, as well as to defend themselves against patents owned by others. As a result, patent decisions become sources of dynamic capabilities in the never ended competition.
     
     In this paper, 2 qualitative analysis researches are presented. First, there are several patent award lists of Taiwan’s three major mobile companies breaking down by ROC, USA and PRC respectively. Secondly, 5 in-depth interviews with 4 high rank managers of Fareastone and it patent law firm were made to show how FET perform it patent strategy against a service product made by another mobile company and software company.
     This thesis is to provide telecom companies with a successful case study in formulating a patent strategy and expects to raise the suggestion for managers in telecom industries regarding the strategic importance of patents and patents management should be part of the “Entrepreneurship”.
     
     Keywords: Telecom, value chain, Patent, Strategy, Patent strategy, Patent analysis
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論…………………………………………………………………………1
      第一節 研究動機與背景…………………………………………………………1
      第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………………………3
      第三節 研究範疇與對象…………………………………………………………4
      第四節 研究流程…………………………………………………………………5
     第二章  理論回顧與文獻探討…………………………………………….………..7
     第一節 電信產業價值鏈………………………………………………………….7
     第二節 競爭策略…………………………………………………………………10
     第三節 專利策略…………………………………………………………………13
     第四節 策略行銷4C理論………………………………………………………..28
     第三章 研究架構與研究方法………………………………………………………35
      第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………………35
      第二節 研究方法…………………………………………………………………38
      第三節 訪談綱要…………………………………………………………………39
      第四節 研究限制…………………………………………………………………40
     第四章 台灣電信事業之專利現況…………………………………………………41
      第一節 遠傳電信FarEasTone……………………………………………………43
      第二節 中華電信CHT…………………………………………………………...49
      第三節 台灣大哥大TWM……………………………………………………….78
      第四節 亞太行動寬頻電信APBW、威寶電信VIBO與其他………………….80
     第五章 電信營運專利策略之案例分析……………………………………………82
     第一節 專利糾紛案例事實………………………………………………………82
     第二節 專家訪談…………………………………………………………………85
     第三節 專利之基礎策略(取得專利‧創造價值‧防禦機制)……………….86
     第四節 策略行銷4C理論之專利策略…………………………………………..88
     第六章 結論與建議……………………………………………………………….…90
     第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………………….…90
     第二節 後續研究建議…………………………………………………………….92
     附錄 本人發明專利之簡介………………………………………………………….97
     第一節 專利發明之背景……………………………………………………….…97
     第二節 本人專利之說明………………………………………………………….98
     附件一 本人專利(一)…………………………………………………………...100
     附件二 本人專利(二)…………………………………………………………...109
     附件三 台灣各主要電信事業商標權核准之現況…………………………………118
     參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………………….120
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091932123en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 電信zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 產業鏈zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 專利zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 專利策略zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 專利分析zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Telecomen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Value chainen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Patenten_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Strategyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Patent strategyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Patent analysisen_US
dc.title (題名) 電信競爭與專利策略之研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study on Telecom Competition and Patent Strategyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分(依筆劃順序)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.毛治國,民95,「後語音時代,就是個人化時代」,數位時代,企業M化專刊,2月8日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.王世堯、王世仁,民91,「專利策略」,智慧財產權管理季刊,12 月號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.司徒達賢,民90,「策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法」,台北:智勝文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.朱敬一、林全,民91,「經濟學的視野」,台北:聯經出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.吳思華,民87,「策略九說」,台北:臉譜文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.何愛文,民91,「論專利制度與競爭法制之關係-從保護專利權之正當性談起」,國立台灣大學法律學研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.邱志聖,民90,「策略行銷分析:架構與實務應用」,台北:智勝文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. 林希展,民95,「Mobile Life History 行動生活的關鍵時刻」,數位時代,企業M化專刊,2月8日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.周皇志等人,民93,「美國專利濫用之研究─從ITC Philips CD-RW 光碟片授權案談起」,經濟部「科技背景跨領域高級人才計畫」九十三年海外培訓成果發表會論文集。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.林柳君譯,凱文瑞維特、大衛克萊特著,民89,「閣樓上的林布蘭」,台北:經典傳訊文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.范曉玲,民93,「熱門的台灣專利假處分戰爭」,專利訴訟致勝之道我國及美國專利訴訟實務研討會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.高希均、林祖嘉,民91,「經濟學的世界(上、中、下篇)」,台北:天下遠見出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.徐源豐譯,大衛傅利曼著,民91,「經濟學與法律的對話」,台北:先覺出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.財團法人資訊工業策進會,民92,「我國寬頻服務產業之結構分析與研究」。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.陳慶瀚,民95,「智慧產權與專利策略」,義首大學電機系網站, http://ccy.dd.ncu.edu.tw/~chen/course/Entrepreneur/2006-05-17%E6%99%BA%E6%85%A7%E7%94%A2%E6%AC%8A%E8%88%87%E5%B0%88%E5%88%A9%E7%AD%96%E7%95%A5.pdf 5月17日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.陳怡之、王泓翔,民93,「專利分析應用於專利策略選擇之探索性研究」,http://www.orstw.org.tw/Conference2004/K/187.pdf 第一屆台灣作業研究學會學術研討會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.陳明達,民93,「策略行銷4C成本之影響-以台灣第三代行動通訊設備供應為例」,國立政治大學經營管理碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.陳思慈,民87,「台灣資訊科技產業之專利管理策略研究」,國立政治大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.陳賜賢等人,民91,「金字塔模型的專利模型創造─以高科技電子公司為例」,經濟部「培訓科技背景跨領域高級人才計畫」九十一年海外培訓成果發表會論文集。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.郭雨嵐,民93,「台灣專利訴訟:贏的策略與實務」,專利訴訟致勝之道我國及美國專利訴訟實務研討會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.黃秀媛譯,金偉燦、莫伯尼著,民94,「藍海策略」,台北:天下遠見出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.曾維茂,民94,「高科技產業專利策略之探討」,國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.馮震宇,民93,「運用專利策略掌握競爭優勢」,能力雜誌,9 月號:頁62-69。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.馮震宇,民92,「創新研發與專利策略」,能力雜誌,7 月號:頁70-76。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.湯明哲,民92,「策略精論:基礎篇」,台北:天下遠見出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26.張安之「電子商務之商業方法專利」,彭心儀主編,民91,美國資訊通信法案例評析,頁213~234,台北:元照出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27.電信國家型科技計畫辦公室、台灣電信產業發展協會,民95,「電信科技與產業發展」,新竹:國立暨南國際大學出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28.楊光華,民90,「服務貿易總協定與我國入會承諾」,月旦法學雜誌No.79,台北:元照出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29.楊振富、潘勛譯,湯馬斯佛里曼著,民94,「世界是平的」,台北:雅言文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30.劉孔中、方修忠,民94,「台灣電信法律實務與案例深度解析」,台北:書泉出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31.劉孔中,民92,「公平交易法」,台北:元照出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32.劉尚志、陳佳麟,民90,「電子商務與電腦軟體之專利保護:發展、分析、創新與策略」,台北:翰蘆圖書出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33.劉尚志、陳佳麟,民90,「專利策略管理與運用(下)」,能力雜誌,1 月號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34.劉尚志、陳佳麟,民89,「專利策略管理與運用(上)」,能力雜誌,12 月號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35.劉瑞復,2000,「經濟法學原理」,北京:北京大學出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36.劉江彬、黃俊英,民93,「智慧財產管理總論」,台北:華泰文化出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37.賴柏洲、戚瑞國譯,喬治吉爾德著,「電訊狂潮」,民91,台北:先覺出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38.鄭洵錚、李美芳,民95,「Mobile Me 20種提案:行動創意來臨!」Mobile Business 行動企業家,第19期。(http://enterprise.fetnet.net)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39.謝穎青,民94,「通訊科技與法律的對話」,台北:天下遠見出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分(依字母順序)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Arora A. and A. Fosfuri. 2003, Licensing the market for technology, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol.52, pp277-295zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Bruce & James D. Wood. 2002. Positioning IP for shareholder value. Managing Intellectual Property, Issue 117:41-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Barney, Jay B. & Ouchi, William G., Organizational Economics, Jossey-Bass Publishers 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Bednarek, Michael D. 1994. Global Patent Strategy. Managing Intellectual Property, Nov 1994; 9, 44; ABI/INFORM Global.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Carey Jordan and Tom Morrow. 2004. Top 10 Patent Drafting Mistakes That Can Impact Litigation. Law Journal Newsletters: Patent Strategy & Management, Volume 5, Number 4.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Deepak Somaya. 2002. Theoretical Perspectives on Patent Strategy. Working paper, R. H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.DENNIS K. BERMAN in New York and JASON SINGER and CASSELL BRYAN-LOW in London:Nokia, Siemens Agree to Combine Equipment Units, THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, June 19, 2006 3:15 a.m.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Deepak Somaya. 2003. Strategic Determinants of Decisions Not to Settle Patent Litigation. Strategic Management Journal. Strat. Mgmt. J., 24: 17–38zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.James Bessen. 2003. Patent Thickets: Strategic Patenting of Complex Technologies. Working Paper Research on Innovation; Boston University - School of Law.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.John T. McNelis. A Powerful Patent Strategy Provisionally. Silicon Valley, California: FENWICK&WEST LLP. July, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Kazuyuki Motohashi. April, 2006. Licensing or Not Licensing?: Empirical Analysis on Strategy Use of Patent in Japanese Firms, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-E-021.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Knight H. Jackson. 2001. Patent Strategy for Researchers and Research Managers (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Lee Davis and Kirsten Kjær. 2003. Patent Strategies of Small Danish High-Tech Firms. Proposal for a paper for the DRUID Summer Conference 2002 on Creating, Sharing and Transferring Knowledge Copenhagen, Denmark. Proposal for a paper for American Law & Economics Association Annual Meeting.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Lester C. Thurow. 1999. Building Wealth-the New Rules for Individuals, Companies and Nations in a Knowledge-based Economy. Andrew Hurnberg Association LTD.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.Miele Anthony. 2001. Patent Strategy-The Manager’s Guide to Profiting form Patent Portfolios. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Michael E. Porter, Competitive Advantage, Free Press, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Michael E. Porter, Competitive Strategy, Free Press, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Rajiv P.Patel, 2004. Developing a Patent Strategy: A Checklist for getting started. Silicon Valley, California: FENWICK&WEST LLP.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Robert J. Walters and Charles J. Hawkins. 2004. The Courts Proper Role in Construing the Claim of a Design Patent: Should a Picture Be Worth a Thousand Words? Law Journal Newsletters: Patent Strategy & Management, Volume 5, Number 1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.Robert M. Grant. 2002. Contemporary Strategy Analysis (4th edition). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.Rivette, Kevin G & David Kline. 2000. Rembrandts in the Attic: Unlocking the Hidden Value of Patents. Boston, Mass: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.Steve Rosenbush. Nokia, Siemens Point the Way. Business Week, JUNE 20, 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.Shumaker & Sieffert. 2002. Patent Filing Strategy. (http://www.uiowa.edu/~c091324a/background%20reading1.pdf)zh_TW