學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 論美歐大型民用航空器補貼案-以歐盟補貼案為研究中心
作者 陳靜儀
貢獻者 楊光華
陳靜儀
關鍵詞 補貼
補貼及平衡措施協定
波音
空中巴士
1992年美歐大型民用航空器協定
Subsidy
Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures
Boeing
Airbus
Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the United States of America concerning the Application of the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft on Trade in Large Civil Aircraft
日期 2008
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:07:00 (UTC+8)
摘要 美國與歐盟在航空產業的補貼爭議已有數十年之久,雙方互相指控對方補貼其國內民用航空器製造業,此一爭議雖經雙方談判協商,但終究談判破裂而進入世界貿易組織(WTO)爭端解決機構,成為WTO歷史上涉案金額最大的一次貿易糾紛案。雖然美國與歐盟就航空器補貼爭議相互於WTO下提出訴訟,總計成立了四個爭端案件,在如此複雜的情況下,目前僅歐盟航空補貼案(DS316)已進入至言詞辯論程序,其他爭議案均未進入實質審理程序,尚無資料可得分析,因此僅就DS316一案而為討論。<br>在該案中,美方指控歐盟以開發補助、基礎設施、研發技術補助等措施為空中巴士進行補貼,提升空中巴士之市場競爭力,對美國波音公司產生不良影響。上述措施是否違反WTO規定,著實進一步分析探討之必要,因此本文將介紹補貼及民用航空器的相關規定,由SCM協定下之補貼構成要件-政府財務補助、利益及特定性之要件,判斷歐盟是否構成補貼,而其中尚須檢驗美國與歐盟首次書狀中論點之合理性、考量過去小組類似判斷之見解與顧及1992年美歐航空器的雙邊協定,最後嘗試預測未來小組判斷中,對補貼之構成與否及其法律效果之意見。
Subsidy dispute of aviation between the US and EU has been lasting over the past decades. Both sides accused each other of subsidizing domestic civil aircraft industry. In spite of having made efforts to solve the trade clash through negotiations, they eventually took the subsidy dispute before Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization(WTO) after the negotiations had failed. In the biggest case ever to come before WTO, US and EU separately filed legal complaints against each other at the WTO, which set up four dispute cases. However, except the oral arguments were held in the European Communities-Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft(DS316), the three other cases have not yet entered into substantial procedures. Therefore, this thesis intends to focus on the DS316 due to no related data available to analyze the rest of the cases.<br>In DS316, the US argued that EU subsidized Airbus by way of such measures as Launch Aid, Infrastructure & Regional Aid and Research & Technology to improve Airbus’s competitiveness in the aviation market and put its US rival Boeing at disadvantage. Given that whether the EU subsides are against the trade rules of the WTO needs further studies, this thesis would like to interpret related rules which regulate subsidy and civil aircraft industry. It would also like to decide if the EU involved in subsidizing by examining the constitutive requirements of subsidy under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures(SCM agreement)including financial contribution, benefit and specificity. This thesis will review the rationality of arguments in the first written submissions both by the US and EU, and then deliberate the opinions of similar decisions from the WTO panel in the past as well as take into account the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the United States of America concerning the Application of the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft on Trade in Large Civil Aircraft in 1992. Finally, this article tries to forecast the opinions about what is regarded as subsidy and the related legal effects in future decisions by the WTO panel.
參考文獻 中文部分
1. 羅昌發,國際貿易法,元照出版公司,2000年9月,第1版。
2. 黃立、李貴英、林彩瑜,WTO 國際貿易法論,元照出版公司,民國2005年9月,第3版。
3. 趙海峰主編,法國商法(第一卷),北京:法律出版社,2004年,第1版。
4. 鍾佩宇,《環保補貼相關問題之研究》,國立政治大學國際貿易所碩士論文,民國95 年1 月。
5. 經濟部國貿局,《烏拉圭回合多邊貿易談判協定-補貼暨平衡措施協定》,民國九十二年
6. 經濟部國貿局,《烏拉圭回合多邊貿易談判協定-爭端解決規則與程序瞭解書》,民國九十二年
英文部分
1. Marc Benitah, THE LAW OF SUBSIDIES UNDER THE GATT/WTO SYSTEM (Kluwer Law International, 2001).
2. John H. Jackson, THE WORLD TRADING SYSTEM (The MIT Press, 1989).
1. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE GATT AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN CIVIL AIRCRAFT ON TRADE IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFT
2. WT/DS316 REQUEST FOR CONSULTATION
3. WT/DS317 REQUEST FOR CONSULTATION
4. WT/DS316 FIRST SUBMISSION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-PUBLIC VERSION
5. WT/DS316 FIRST SUBMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMIUNITIES- PUBLIC VERSION
6. WT/DS316 OPENING STATEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES FIRST MEETING OF THE PANEL
7. WT/DS316 FIRST ORAL STATEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
8. WT/DS316 CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AT THE FIRST SUBSTANTIVE MEETING OF THE PANEL
9. WT/DS70/R
10. WT/DS70/AB/R
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
93351043
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093351043
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 楊光華zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳靜儀zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 陳靜儀zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:07:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:07:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:07:00 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0093351043en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30041-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國際經營與貿易研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93351043zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 美國與歐盟在航空產業的補貼爭議已有數十年之久,雙方互相指控對方補貼其國內民用航空器製造業,此一爭議雖經雙方談判協商,但終究談判破裂而進入世界貿易組織(WTO)爭端解決機構,成為WTO歷史上涉案金額最大的一次貿易糾紛案。雖然美國與歐盟就航空器補貼爭議相互於WTO下提出訴訟,總計成立了四個爭端案件,在如此複雜的情況下,目前僅歐盟航空補貼案(DS316)已進入至言詞辯論程序,其他爭議案均未進入實質審理程序,尚無資料可得分析,因此僅就DS316一案而為討論。<br>在該案中,美方指控歐盟以開發補助、基礎設施、研發技術補助等措施為空中巴士進行補貼,提升空中巴士之市場競爭力,對美國波音公司產生不良影響。上述措施是否違反WTO規定,著實進一步分析探討之必要,因此本文將介紹補貼及民用航空器的相關規定,由SCM協定下之補貼構成要件-政府財務補助、利益及特定性之要件,判斷歐盟是否構成補貼,而其中尚須檢驗美國與歐盟首次書狀中論點之合理性、考量過去小組類似判斷之見解與顧及1992年美歐航空器的雙邊協定,最後嘗試預測未來小組判斷中,對補貼之構成與否及其法律效果之意見。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Subsidy dispute of aviation between the US and EU has been lasting over the past decades. Both sides accused each other of subsidizing domestic civil aircraft industry. In spite of having made efforts to solve the trade clash through negotiations, they eventually took the subsidy dispute before Dispute Settlement Body of the World Trade Organization(WTO) after the negotiations had failed. In the biggest case ever to come before WTO, US and EU separately filed legal complaints against each other at the WTO, which set up four dispute cases. However, except the oral arguments were held in the European Communities-Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft(DS316), the three other cases have not yet entered into substantial procedures. Therefore, this thesis intends to focus on the DS316 due to no related data available to analyze the rest of the cases.<br>In DS316, the US argued that EU subsidized Airbus by way of such measures as Launch Aid, Infrastructure & Regional Aid and Research & Technology to improve Airbus’s competitiveness in the aviation market and put its US rival Boeing at disadvantage. Given that whether the EU subsides are against the trade rules of the WTO needs further studies, this thesis would like to interpret related rules which regulate subsidy and civil aircraft industry. It would also like to decide if the EU involved in subsidizing by examining the constitutive requirements of subsidy under the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures(SCM agreement)including financial contribution, benefit and specificity. This thesis will review the rationality of arguments in the first written submissions both by the US and EU, and then deliberate the opinions of similar decisions from the WTO panel in the past as well as take into account the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the United States of America concerning the Application of the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft on Trade in Large Civil Aircraft in 1992. Finally, this article tries to forecast the opinions about what is regarded as subsidy and the related legal effects in future decisions by the WTO panel.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究動機 1
     第二節 研究範圍與限制 2
     第三節 研究架構 3
     第二章 本案事實及相關背景 4
     第一節 本案之背景 4
     第一項 雙方當事國涉訟企業之背景 5
     第二項 本案發生之原因 10
     第三項 本案及其他美歐航空補貼案迄今之進展 11
     第二節 本案事實 14
     第一項 開發貸款(launch aid)措施 15
     第二項 基礎設施 19
     第三項 研發技術補助措施 22
     第三節 本案牽涉之協定 24
     第一項 SCM協定 24
     第二項 WTO民用航空器貿易協定 37
     第三項 1992年美歐雙邊航空器協定 40
     第三章 各主要措施之檢討 43
     第一節 開發貸款措施 43
     第一項 政府財務補助 43
     第二項 利益 44
     第三項 特定性 45
     第二節 基礎設施 46
     第一項 政府財務補助 46
     第二項 利益 47
     第三項 特定性 47
     第三節 研發技術補助措施 47
     第一項 政府財務補助 47
     第二項 利益 48
     第三項 特定性 48
     第四章 結論 52
     參考文獻 54
     附錄 1992年美歐雙邊航空器協定 57
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093351043en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 補貼zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 補貼及平衡措施協定zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 波音zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 空中巴士zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 1992年美歐大型民用航空器協定zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Subsidyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measuresen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Boeingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Airbusen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of the United States of America concerning the Application of the GATT Agreement on Trade in Civil Aircraft on Trade in Large Civil Aircraften_US
dc.title (題名) 論美歐大型民用航空器補貼案-以歐盟補貼案為研究中心zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 羅昌發,國際貿易法,元照出版公司,2000年9月,第1版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. 黃立、李貴英、林彩瑜,WTO 國際貿易法論,元照出版公司,民國2005年9月,第3版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. 趙海峰主編,法國商法(第一卷),北京:法律出版社,2004年,第1版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. 鍾佩宇,《環保補貼相關問題之研究》,國立政治大學國際貿易所碩士論文,民國95 年1 月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. 經濟部國貿局,《烏拉圭回合多邊貿易談判協定-補貼暨平衡措施協定》,民國九十二年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. 經濟部國貿局,《烏拉圭回合多邊貿易談判協定-爭端解決規則與程序瞭解書》,民國九十二年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Marc Benitah, THE LAW OF SUBSIDIES UNDER THE GATT/WTO SYSTEM (Kluwer Law International, 2001).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. John H. Jackson, THE WORLD TRADING SYSTEM (The MIT Press, 1989).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY CONCERNING THE APPLICATION OF THE GATT AGREEMENT ON TRADE IN CIVIL AIRCRAFT ON TRADE IN LARGE CIVIL AIRCRAFTzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. WT/DS316 REQUEST FOR CONSULTATIONzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. WT/DS317 REQUEST FOR CONSULTATIONzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. WT/DS316 FIRST SUBMISSION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-PUBLIC VERSIONzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. WT/DS316 FIRST SUBMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMIUNITIES- PUBLIC VERSIONzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. WT/DS316 OPENING STATEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES FIRST MEETING OF THE PANELzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. WT/DS316 FIRST ORAL STATEMENT OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIESzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. WT/DS316 CLOSING STATEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AT THE FIRST SUBSTANTIVE MEETING OF THE PANELzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. WT/DS70/Rzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. WT/DS70/AB/Rzh_TW