學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 經理人異動與董事會特性關聯性之研究
作者 陳慧玲
貢獻者 汪泱若
陳慧玲
關鍵詞 總經理異動
最終控制者
獨立董事
CEO turnover
ultimate controller
independent directors
日期 2003
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:21:14 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究將總經理之異動分為自願性與非自願異動二種,主要探討董事會之特性與、控制股東與總經理發生非自願性異動間之關聯性,並且強調從董事會獨立性及最終控制者對董事會之控制力觀點,探討董事會解除總經理職務之決策行為。除此之外,本研究尚探討總經理異動後影響董事會選任繼任總經理之決策行為,主要從董事會之獨立性與異動前績效兩項觀點。研究樣本為民國八十八年至九十二年之台灣上市公司,探用Logit model來檢驗假說。
      在總經理發生非自願性異動方面,實證結果顯示,當前期的績效愈差時,總經理發生非自願性異動的機率愈高,本研究並將董事會特性分為股權結構及董事會獨立性兩種,並加入最終控制者觀點,實證結果顯示,獨立董事的比率愈高,總經理發生非自願性異動的機率愈高,惟其結果不具統計上的重大性。總經理之持股比率佔董事全體持股比率較高時,愈容易發生總經理非自願性異動,但不具有統計上的重大性。當董事長與總經理為同一人時,較不易發生總經理非自願性異動。此外,在最終控制者方面,實證結果顯示,當控制股東席次控制權愈高時,總經理發生非自願性異動的機率愈低,控制股東的盈餘分配權與席次控制權的偏離程度愈大時,總經理發生非自願性異動的機率愈低,但不具統計上的重大性。
     在繼任總經理特性與董事會特性關聯性方面,實證結果顯示,當異動前績效愈差時,董事會愈傾向於選用外部繼任者,但不具有統計上的重大性。獨立董事比率愈高,董事會愈傾向於選用外部繼任者。
       整體而言,績效是影響我國上市公司總經理發生非自願性異動的重要原因之一,除此之外,董事長兼任總經理之情形,讓董事長有能力去阻止他們被撤換,進而降低總經理非自願性的離職機率。由於我國上市公司特殊的股權結構,使得控制股東掌控了董事會並且積極參與公司經營,造成董事會流於形式,無形中降低了董事會的監督職能,而設置獨立董事是提高董事會職能發揮的重要機制之一,在本研究中,雖未發現獨立董事的設置對於董事會的監督職能之顯著助益,但發現設置獨立董事在決定繼任者方面,能提出專業建言,使得董事會選任繼任總經理能有更廣泛的人選,而非侷限於公司內部。
This research CEO turnover will divide into voluntary turnover and non- voluntary turnover. This research discusses the relationship among corporate performance, characteristics of board of the directors, non- voluntary CEO turnover and controlling shareholders. This research emphasizes the board of directors independence and the controlling shareholders’ controlling force over the board of directors and discusses the board of directors’ policy-making behavior of firing CEO.In addition, this research also discusses how does the board of directors appoint succeed CEO.The sample consists of all public companies listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation over the four-year period 2000-2003.According to previous studies, the characteristics of the board of directors are ownership structure and independence. This research also considerate the controlling shareholders.
     This research provides evidence on the relationship between non- voluntary CEO turnover and corporate performance. The likelihood of non- voluntary CEO turnover is significantly negatively related to the pre-performance. Non- voluntary CEO turnover rate is low when the chairman of the board and CEO are the same person. In addition, this research provides evidence on the relationship between the board of directors independence and the characteristics of the succeed CEO.When the fraction of outside directors is high, the board of directors comparatively possibly appoints the outsider successor.
參考文獻 [中文部分)
1.黃鈺光,1993,我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究,國立台灣 大學會計學系未出版碩士論文
2.許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙,2003,控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之 衡量(上),貨幣觀測與信用評等(月):15-31
3.許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙,2003,控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之 衡量(下),貨幣觀測與信用評等(9月):11-26
4.沈中華、吳孟紋,銀行治理、銀行失敗與銀行績效,2001,Working  
 Paper
5.楊善富,2000,台灣上市公司高階主管持股比例、績效與離職關係之實 證研究,國立中正大學會計系未出版碩士論文
6.翁淑育,2000,台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與與公司價值之 研究,輔仁大學金融系未出版碩士論文
7.林明謙,2001,股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研 
 究,輔仁大學金融系未出版碩士論文
8.林玉霞,2002,台灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究, 中原大學會計系未出版碩士論文
9.洪晨桓,2003,以附加經濟價值探討公司績效與高階主管替換之關係, 國立東華大學企管系未出版碩士論文
10.陳彥霓,2002,經理人異動對公司策略及績效影響之資訊意涵,國立 政治大學財務管理系未出版碩士論文
11.陳從聖,2002,公司治理、高階管理者更迭與企業價值關係之研究, 國立中正大學會計系未出版碩士論文
12.陳慧慧,2003,公司治理、總經理更換與公司績效關聯性之研究,國 立嘉義大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文
參考文獻:(英文部分)
1.Allgood, S. and Farrell, K. A.2003.The match between CEO and  firm. The Journal of Business 76,2 (Apr):317-341
2.Boeker, W., and J. Goodstein. 1993 Performance and successor  choice:the moderating effects of governance and ownership.  
 Academy of Management Journal 36(Feb):172-186
3.Boomer W. H., and Ellstrand A. E,. 1996 CEO Successor  
 choice,its antecedents and influence on subsequent firm  
 performance. Group & Organization Management 21(Mar):105-121
4.Borokhovich, K., R.Parrino and T.Trapani. 1996 Outside  
 directors and CEO selection. Journal of Financial and  
 Quantitative analysis 31(Sep):337-355
5.Claessens, S.,S ,Djankov and L. P. H. Lang, .2000 The  
 separation of ownership and control in East Asian  
 corporation. Journal of Financial Economics 57 (Dec):2741- 
 2771
6.Dahya, J., A. A. Lonie, and D.M. Power. 1998 .Ownership
 structure, firm performance and top executive change:an
 analysis of UK firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting (Dec):1089-1118
7.Dalton, D.,and Kesner, I.1985. Organizational performance as
 an antecedent of inside/outside chief exective succession :an
 empirical assessment.Academy of Management Journal 28:749-762
8.Denis, D. K. and Mcconnell 2003. International corporate  
 governance.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38 (Mar):1-36
9.Dyhya, J.J., McConnell,and N. G. Travlos. 2002.the Cadbury  
 Committee, corporate performance, and top management  
 turnover. the Journal of Finance 1(Feb):461-483.
10.Fama, E.F., and M.C.Jensen, agency problems and residual  
 claims, Journal of law and economics,26:327-350
11.Friedman, S. D. and Singh H. 1989. CEO succession and  
 stockholder reaction :the influence of organizational context  and event content. Academy of Management Journal 4. 718-744
12.Huson, M., R.Parrino and J.Starks. 2001.Internal monitoring  mechanisms and CEO turnover: a long-term perspective.the  
 Journal of Finance 6(Dec):2265-2297
13.Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976.Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.  
 Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360.
14.Jun-Koo Kang and Anil Shivdasani. 1995 Firm  
 performance,corporate governance, and top executive turnover  in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics38(July):29-58
15.La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer.  
 1999.Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of  
 Finance. Vol. 54:471-517
16.Scherrer, P. S. 2003. Directors’reponsibility and  
 participation in the strategic decision making process.  
 Corporate Governance 3,1:86-90
17.Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate  
 Governance. Journal of Finance 5.52:737-783.
18.Warner, J.B., R. L. Watts, and K. H. Wruck. 1988.Stock price  and top management changes. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (Oct) :461-492.
19.Weisbach, M.S.,1998 Outside directors and CEO turnover,  
 Journal of financial economics,20:431-460
描述 國立政治大學
會計研究所
91353035
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353035
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 汪泱若zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 陳慧玲zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 陳慧玲zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:21:14 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:21:14 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:21:14 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0091353035en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30153-
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91353035zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究將總經理之異動分為自願性與非自願異動二種,主要探討董事會之特性與、控制股東與總經理發生非自願性異動間之關聯性,並且強調從董事會獨立性及最終控制者對董事會之控制力觀點,探討董事會解除總經理職務之決策行為。除此之外,本研究尚探討總經理異動後影響董事會選任繼任總經理之決策行為,主要從董事會之獨立性與異動前績效兩項觀點。研究樣本為民國八十八年至九十二年之台灣上市公司,探用Logit model來檢驗假說。
      在總經理發生非自願性異動方面,實證結果顯示,當前期的績效愈差時,總經理發生非自願性異動的機率愈高,本研究並將董事會特性分為股權結構及董事會獨立性兩種,並加入最終控制者觀點,實證結果顯示,獨立董事的比率愈高,總經理發生非自願性異動的機率愈高,惟其結果不具統計上的重大性。總經理之持股比率佔董事全體持股比率較高時,愈容易發生總經理非自願性異動,但不具有統計上的重大性。當董事長與總經理為同一人時,較不易發生總經理非自願性異動。此外,在最終控制者方面,實證結果顯示,當控制股東席次控制權愈高時,總經理發生非自願性異動的機率愈低,控制股東的盈餘分配權與席次控制權的偏離程度愈大時,總經理發生非自願性異動的機率愈低,但不具統計上的重大性。
     在繼任總經理特性與董事會特性關聯性方面,實證結果顯示,當異動前績效愈差時,董事會愈傾向於選用外部繼任者,但不具有統計上的重大性。獨立董事比率愈高,董事會愈傾向於選用外部繼任者。
       整體而言,績效是影響我國上市公司總經理發生非自願性異動的重要原因之一,除此之外,董事長兼任總經理之情形,讓董事長有能力去阻止他們被撤換,進而降低總經理非自願性的離職機率。由於我國上市公司特殊的股權結構,使得控制股東掌控了董事會並且積極參與公司經營,造成董事會流於形式,無形中降低了董事會的監督職能,而設置獨立董事是提高董事會職能發揮的重要機制之一,在本研究中,雖未發現獨立董事的設置對於董事會的監督職能之顯著助益,但發現設置獨立董事在決定繼任者方面,能提出專業建言,使得董事會選任繼任總經理能有更廣泛的人選,而非侷限於公司內部。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This research CEO turnover will divide into voluntary turnover and non- voluntary turnover. This research discusses the relationship among corporate performance, characteristics of board of the directors, non- voluntary CEO turnover and controlling shareholders. This research emphasizes the board of directors independence and the controlling shareholders’ controlling force over the board of directors and discusses the board of directors’ policy-making behavior of firing CEO.In addition, this research also discusses how does the board of directors appoint succeed CEO.The sample consists of all public companies listed on Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation over the four-year period 2000-2003.According to previous studies, the characteristics of the board of directors are ownership structure and independence. This research also considerate the controlling shareholders.
     This research provides evidence on the relationship between non- voluntary CEO turnover and corporate performance. The likelihood of non- voluntary CEO turnover is significantly negatively related to the pre-performance. Non- voluntary CEO turnover rate is low when the chairman of the board and CEO are the same person. In addition, this research provides evidence on the relationship between the board of directors independence and the characteristics of the succeed CEO.When the fraction of outside directors is high, the board of directors comparatively possibly appoints the outsider successor.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目次
     圖目錄...........................Ⅱ
     表目錄...........................Ⅱ
     第一章 緒論
     第一節 研究動機......................1
     第二節 研究問題......................6
     第三節 研究架構......................7
     第四節 研究流程......................8
     
     第二章 文獻探討
     第一節 總經理異動原因...................9
     第二節 影響總經理異動的決定性因素.............13
     第三節 影響繼任總經理特性之決定性因素...........26
     
     第三章 研究方法
     第一節 研究假說......................31
     第二節 研究期間與資料來源.................34
     第三節 變數衡量......................35
     第四節 實證模式......................39
     
     第四章 實證結果與分析
     第一節 總經理異動原因分析.................43
     第二節 敍述統計量分析...................46
     第三節 實證結果......................52
     
     第五章 結論與建議
     第一節 研究結論......................55
     第二節 研究限制......................59
     第三節 後續研究建議....................59
     
     參考文獻...........................60
     
     圖目錄
     圖1-1 研究流程圖..............................8
     
     表目錄
     表2-1 總經理異動原因彙整表.................12
     表2-2 總經理非自願性異動與績效之關係彙整表.........16
     表2-3 影響總經理異動之主要因素彙總表............23
     表2-4 影響董事會選任繼任總經理決策之影響因素表.......30
     表3-1 自變數對因變數(總經理是否發生非自願性離職)的係數預期方    向..........................41
     表3-2 自變數對因變數(繼任總經理是否為外部繼任者)的係數預期
      方向.........................42
     表4-1 各年度總經理異動之原因分類表.............44
     表4-2 各年度總經理異動之原因分類表(依自願性與非自願性分   
         類).........................45
     表4-3 樣本之產業分類表...................46
     表4-4 總經理異動的產業分布表................47
     表4-5 總經理異動次數的年度分布...............48
     表4-6 各年度繼任總經理特性之分布..............48
     表4-7 各年度繼任總經理身份之分布..............50
     表4-8 各自變數的敍述性統計表................50
     表4-9 各變數之Pearson/Spearson相關係數矩陣.........51
     表4-10 以總經理異動作為因變數之實證結果........ ..53
     表4-11 以繼任總經理特性作為因變數之實證結果.........54
     表5-1 總經理非自願性異動決定性因素實證結果彙總表......55
     表5-2 繼任總經理特性決定性因素實證結果彙總表........56
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353035en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 總經理異動zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 最終控制者zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 獨立董事zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) CEO turnoveren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) ultimate controlleren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) independent directorsen_US
dc.title (題名) 經理人異動與董事會特性關聯性之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [中文部分)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.黃鈺光,1993,我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究,國立台灣 大學會計學系未出版碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙,2003,控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之 衡量(上),貨幣觀測與信用評等(月):15-31zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙,2003,控制權與盈餘分配權偏離之 衡量(下),貨幣觀測與信用評等(9月):11-26zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.沈中華、吳孟紋,銀行治理、銀行失敗與銀行績效,2001,Working  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Paperzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.楊善富,2000,台灣上市公司高階主管持股比例、績效與離職關係之實 證研究,國立中正大學會計系未出版碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.翁淑育,2000,台灣上市公司股權結構、核心代理問題與與公司價值之 研究,輔仁大學金融系未出版碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.林明謙,2001,股權結構、董事組成對大股東介入股市行為影響之研 zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  究,輔仁大學金融系未出版碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.林玉霞,2002,台灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究, 中原大學會計系未出版碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.洪晨桓,2003,以附加經濟價值探討公司績效與高階主管替換之關係, 國立東華大學企管系未出版碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.陳彥霓,2002,經理人異動對公司策略及績效影響之資訊意涵,國立 政治大學財務管理系未出版碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.陳從聖,2002,公司治理、高階管理者更迭與企業價值關係之研究, 國立中正大學會計系未出版碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.陳慧慧,2003,公司治理、總經理更換與公司績效關聯性之研究,國 立嘉義大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考文獻:(英文部分)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Allgood, S. and Farrell, K. A.2003.The match between CEO and  firm. The Journal of Business 76,2 (Apr):317-341zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Boeker, W., and J. Goodstein. 1993 Performance and successor  choice:the moderating effects of governance and ownership.  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Academy of Management Journal 36(Feb):172-186zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Boomer W. H., and Ellstrand A. E,. 1996 CEO Successor  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  choice,its antecedents and influence on subsequent firm  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  performance. Group & Organization Management 21(Mar):105-121zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Borokhovich, K., R.Parrino and T.Trapani. 1996 Outside  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  directors and CEO selection. Journal of Financial and  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Quantitative analysis 31(Sep):337-355zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Claessens, S.,S ,Djankov and L. P. H. Lang, .2000 The  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  separation of ownership and control in East Asian  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  corporation. Journal of Financial Economics 57 (Dec):2741- zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  2771zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Dahya, J., A. A. Lonie, and D.M. Power. 1998 .Ownershipzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  structure, firm performance and top executive change:anzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  analysis of UK firms. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting (Dec):1089-1118zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Dalton, D.,and Kesner, I.1985. Organizational performance aszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  an antecedent of inside/outside chief exective succession :anzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  empirical assessment.Academy of Management Journal 28:749-762zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Denis, D. K. and Mcconnell 2003. International corporate  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  governance.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 38 (Mar):1-36zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.Dyhya, J.J., McConnell,and N. G. Travlos. 2002.the Cadbury  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Committee, corporate performance, and top management  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  turnover. the Journal of Finance 1(Feb):461-483.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.Fama, E.F., and M.C.Jensen, agency problems and residual  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  claims, Journal of law and economics,26:327-350zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.Friedman, S. D. and Singh H. 1989. CEO succession and  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  stockholder reaction :the influence of organizational context  and event content. Academy of Management Journal 4. 718-744zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.Huson, M., R.Parrino and J.Starks. 2001.Internal monitoring  mechanisms and CEO turnover: a long-term perspective.the  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Journal of Finance 6(Dec):2265-2297zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976.Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Jun-Koo Kang and Anil Shivdasani. 1995 Firm  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  performance,corporate governance, and top executive turnover  in Japan. Journal of Financial Economics38(July):29-58zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer.  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  1999.Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Finance. Vol. 54:471-517zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Scherrer, P. S. 2003. Directors’reponsibility and  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  participation in the strategic decision making process.  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Corporate Governance 3,1:86-90zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Governance. Journal of Finance 5.52:737-783.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Warner, J.B., R. L. Watts, and K. H. Wruck. 1988.Stock price  and top management changes. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (Oct) :461-492.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Weisbach, M.S.,1998 Outside directors and CEO turnover,  zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻)  Journal of financial economics,20:431-460zh_TW