| dc.contributor.advisor | 林宛瑩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 林家靜 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林家靜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date (日期) | 2003 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 11-Sep-2009 17:21:20 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 11-Sep-2009 17:21:20 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 11-Sep-2009 17:21:20 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0091353036 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30154 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 會計研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 91353036 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 92 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 隨著1997的亞洲金融風暴、1998下半年陸續發生的台灣上市公司財務危 機事件，以及2001年底美國大型公司企業弊案的層出不窮，除了一再地打擊投資人的信心，擾亂資本市場秩序外，也使投資者與證券主管機關體認到，完善的公司治理機制（corporate governance），是健全資本市場與吸引國際資金的關鍵因素之一。 公司組織的代理關係衍生出盈餘操縱與公司治理的相關問題，本研究在 第一個部分所欲探討的是公司治理的機制是否能抑制管理階層進行盈餘操 縱?另外，一般投資大眾所關心的是他們的投資標的是否為其帶來優異的報酬，而公司股價報酬率是否能提高，除了外在總體經濟的因素外，不外乎是公司本身的變數，因此本研究以董監事特性、經理人特性、關係人特性及股權結構四個構面之公司治理變數，以及盈餘操縱程度為控制變數，探討公司治理與投資人的股價報酬二者間之關係。 研究結果顯示：當董事長兼任總經理時，公司盈餘操縱程度較高。超額 關係人資金往來比例越高，盈餘操縱幅度越高。董事會規模越大，盈餘操縱程度越低。監察人總人數、董監事質押比例、控制權與盈餘分配權的偏離程度、董事會獨立程度、超額關係人進銷貨比例、機構投資人持股比例、大股東持股比例與盈餘操縱的幅度都沒有顯著相關性。 董事會規模與公司公司股價報酬率呈負相關。監察人總人數與公司股價 報酬率成正相關。董監事質押比率與公司股價報酬率呈負相關。董事會獨立程度與公司股價報酬率呈正相關。超額關係人進銷貨比例與股價報酬率呈正相關。控制權與盈餘分配權偏離程度、經理人是否由董事長兼任、超額關係人資金往來比例、機構投資人持股比例、外部大股東持股比例均與股價報酬率無顯著相關性。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Along with Asia monetary crush in 1997, Taiwan business financial crisis happened one after another in 1998 and American large enterprise fraud cases appeared again and again in 2001, not only to beat investors’ confidence and to disturb capital market order, but also make investors and the authorities concerned recognize that a complete corporate governance mechanism is a key factor of healing capital market and attracting international capital. The agency relation of business organization derives problems about earnings manipulation and corporate governance. The first part of this research is want to discuss if corporate governance mechanism can restrain management level from manipulating earnings. The most concern of common investors is that whether their invest target can bring them well return. If we want to raise the stock-price return of a company, in addition to macro economic factors, the condition of business itself is really important. The second part of this research set broad characteristics, management characteristics, related party transaction and equity structure as research variables and earnings manipulation degree as control variables to discuss the relation between corporate governance and stock-price return. The result of the first portion of research shows that when CEO simultaneously serves as Chairman of the board and exceed-ratio of related party capital intercourse is higher, the firms have higher earnings manipulation. There is a negative relation between broad size and earnings manipulation. Total number of supervisors, the rate of directors’ and supervisors’shareholdings that are pledged, the deviation between cash-flow right and seating right, broad independence, exceed-ratio of related party purchase and sales, institutional investor holding rate, outside blockholders holding rate have no relation with earnings manipulation. The result of the second portion of research shows that total number of supervisors, broad independence and exceed-ratio of related party purchase and sales have positive relation with stock-price return. There is a negative relation between stock-price return and broad size and the rate of directors’ and supervisors’ shareholdings that are pledged. CEO simultaneously serves as Chairman of the board, the deviation between cash-flow rights and seating rights, exceed-ratio of related party capital intercourse, institutional investor holding rate, outside blockholders holding rate have no relation with stock-price return. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 圖目錄………………………………………………………………………ii 表目錄………………………………………………………………………ii 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………………..1 第一節 研究動機……………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究問題……………………………………………………………3 第三節 研究架構……………………………………………………………7 第四節 本文架構……………………………………………………………8 第二章 文獻回顧…………………………………………………………..9 第一節 公司治理與盈餘操縱………………………………………………9 第二節 公司治理與績效、價值及盈餘資訊內涵的關係…………………25 第三節 盈餘操縱與股價報酬相關研究……………………………………30 第三章 研究方法……………………………………………………………34 第一節 研究假說……………………………………………………………34 第二節 變數衡量……………………………………………………………41 第三節 樣本與資料來源……………………………………………………54 第四章 實證研究結果………………………………………………………56 第一節 敘述性統計分析……………………………………………………56 第二節 複回歸分析結果……………………………………………………60 第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………………………68 第一節 研究結論……………………………………………………………68 第二節 研究限制……………………………………………………………70 第三節 建議…………………………………………………………………70 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………72 附錄…………………………………………………………………………77 圖目錄 圖1-1 傳統代理問題與新代理問題…………………………………………………1 圖1-2 公司治理機制與盈餘操縱之關係……………………………………………6 圖1-3 公司治理機制與股價報酬之關係……………………………………………7 圖1-4 研究架構流程圖………………………………………………………………7 圖2-1 世界銀行之公司治理架構…………………………………………………..12 表目錄 表2-1 里昂證券、美國標準普爾及葉銀華等人之公司治理評等系統比較……..17 表3-1 模型一研究變數彙整………………………………………………………..49 表3-2 模型二研究變數彙整………………………………………………………..52 表3-3 變數衡量方式彙整…………………………………………………………..53 表4-1 樣本年度及產業分佈圖……………………………………………………..56 表4-2 模型一之各項變數敘述統計量……………………………………………..57 表4-3 各變數之VIF值………………………………………………………………61 表4-4 個模型之D-W值……………………………………………………………..62 表4-5 模型一樣本迴歸分析表……………………………………………………..63 表4-6 模型二樣本迴歸分析表……………………………………………………..65 表4-7 實證結果彙整………………………………………………………………..67 表A-1 里昂證券之公司治理評等………………………………………………….77 表A-2 標準普爾公司之公司治理評等…………………………………………….78 表A-3 台灣公司治理評等系統…………………………………………………….80 表A-4 Spearman相關係數矩陣……………………………………………………81 表A-5 Pearson相關係數矩陣……………………………………………82 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0091353036 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 公司治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 盈餘管理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 投資人報酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | corporate governance | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | earnings management | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | stock price return | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 公司治理、盈餘管理與投資人報酬之關連性研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、中文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王鼎立，2001，董事會結構與公司盈餘的傳遞效果，東吳大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王昱欣，2002，新上市盈餘管理與異常報酬之關連性研究，私立輔仁大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳庭州，1997，股權結構、盈餘管理與盈餘資訊性之研究，輔仁大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 何幸芳，2002，獨立董監事對公司價值與盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究，私立輔仁大學金融研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林宜勉，1999，盈餘資訊性與管理者股權之關聯性研究，企銀季刊第23 卷，第1 期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林玉霞，2002，臺灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究，中原大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 柯承恩，2000，我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(上)，會計研究月刊173期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 柯承恩，2000，我國公司監理體系之問題與改進建議(下)，會計研究月刊174期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 馬鳳禧，2003，會計保守性對盈餘品質之影響及與股票報酬之關聯性，台灣大學管理學院未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 許崇源、李怡宗、林宛瑩、鄭桂蕙，2003a，「控制權與盈餘分配權之衡量（上）」，貨幣觀測與信用評等42，15-31 頁。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ______、______、______、______，2003b，「控制權與盈餘分配權之衡量（下）」，貨幣觀測與信用評等43，11-26 頁。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 康榮寶、陳美娥、羅吉台，2003，以財務預警模式強化公司治理價值，會計研究月刊第212 期：105-111。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳錦隆，2003，對獨立董事之省思，會計研究月刊第209 期：59-68。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳家慧，2000，我國上市公司管理機制與盈餘管理相關性之實證研究，政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳俊尹，2001，初次上市、櫃公司長期股價報酬與盈餘管理之探討，輔仁大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張智怡，2001，公司成長機會、高階經理人獎酬與盈餘管理之關連性研究，政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張瑞棻，2002，股權結構與盈餘管理之相關性研究，私立輔仁大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張俊仁，2002，盈餘管理型態與長期股價報酬之關係，私立淡江大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 彭政錦，2003，董事會特性、股權結構及機構投資人持股與盈餘管理關聯性研究，嘉義大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩，2002，公司治理評等系統，商智文化。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 萬文娟，2003，透視富邦集團的關係人交易玄機，商業週刊：106-112。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡揚宗，2003，落實監察人制度宜公司治理當務之急，會計研究月刊，第212期：12-14。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ______，2003，從股東會看我國公司治理，會計研究月刊，第210 期：14-16。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 羅陽春，2001，我國上市公司董監改選前盈餘管理行為之研究，政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、英文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Agrawal, A., and C. Knoeber. 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Finance and Quantitative analysis 31:.377-397. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Austin, J., A. Lee, and D. Warren. 1999. The effect of corporate governance on earnings management. Working paper. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cadbury, A. 1999. What are the trends in corporate governance? How will they impact your company? Long Range Planning 32:12-19. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chtourou, S.M., J. N. Bedard, and L. Courteau. 2001. Corporate Governance and Earnings Management, Working paper, University of Sfax. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58:81-112. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | DeChow, P.M., R.G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1996. Cause and Consequence of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13:1-36. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ______ , and D.J. Skinner. 2000. Earnings management: reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons Vol.14 No. 2:235-250. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fama, E. F., and K. R. French. 1992 .The cross-section of expected stock returns.Journal of Finance 47: 427-465. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ______ , and M. Jensen.1983a. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics: 301-325. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativness oef accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting & Economics 33:401-425. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Healy, P. 1985. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decision. Journal of Accounting and Economics: 85-107. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ______ , and J. M. Wahlen. 1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons Vol. 13 No.4:365-383. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Imhoff, Jr. E.A. 2003. Accounting quality, auditing, and corporate governance. Accounting Horizons Supplement:117-128. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jensen, M. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal control systems. The Journal of Finance 3:831-880. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ______ , and W. H. Meckling. 1976.Theory of the Firm Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3:305-360. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnson, S., P. Boone, A. Breach, and E. Friedman. 2000. Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (1):141-186. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jones, J. 1991. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29:193-228. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kaplan, S.E. 2001. Ethically related judgments by observers of earnings management. Journal of Business Ethics 32:285-298. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999.Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance. Vol. 54:471-517. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ______ , ______ , ______ and R. W. Vishny. 2002. Investor Protection and corporate Valuation. Journal of Finance Vol. 37: 1147-1170. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lemmon, L. M., and K. V. Lins. 2001.Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance, And Firm Value：Evidence from the East Asian Financial Crisis.Working Paper. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parfet, W.U. 2000. Accounting subjectivity and earnings management: a preparer perspective. Accounitng Horizons Vol.14 No.4:481-488. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Penman, S. H., and X.J. Zhang. 2002. Accounting Conservatism, the Quality of Earnings, and Stock Returns. The Accounting Review 77 (April):237-264. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rajgopal, S. and M. Venkatachalam. 1998. The role of institutional investors in corporate governance: an empirical investigation. Working paper. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Schipper, K., and L. Vincent. 2003. Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons Supplement:97-110. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance Vol. 5.52:737-783. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | World Bank, 1999, Corporate Governance: A Framework for Implementation. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1986. Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Xie, B., W.N. Davidson, P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9: 295-316. | zh_TW |
