Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 繼續保持公開發行與撤銷公開發行二類公司盈餘品質異同之研究
作者 蘇俞維
貢獻者 戚務君
蘇俞維
關鍵詞 盈餘品質
earnings quality
日期 2006
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:26:19 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究主要在探討「強制公開制度對財務報表品質的影響」。強制公司公開發行是否有其必要性一直是各界所爭論的議題,藉著研究繼續保持公開發行與撤銷公開發行二類公司盈餘品質之異同,本研究提供證據證明強制公開發行此一政策是否有效。本研究用來衡量盈餘品質之代理變數有盈餘穩健性及避免負盈餘,實證結果顯示在控制規模的影響後,繼續公開發行公司之盈餘穩健性較撤銷公開發行公司為佳。而在避免負盈餘方面,二類公司都有避免負盈餘的傾向,唯二類公司差異並不顯著。本研究之結果顯示,我們無法要求自願公開與受法令規定而公開發行此二類公司有相同的盈餘品質,我期望本研究之結果能做為主管機關在制定相關法令時之參考依據。
The main purpose of this study is to examine the impact of force the company public on the quality of financial report. We provide evidence that the policy of force the company public is effectiveness or not. This study uses earnings conservatism and likelihood of negative earrings benchmark as dependent variables. The results show that, after controlling firm size effect, earnings quality of keeping public firms is better than that of going private firms in earnings conservatism. So it concludes that people are unable to request the two kinds firms to have the same earnings quality, I expects that this finding can be a reference when government legislates the related law.
參考文獻 經濟日報,2003/10/31,企業強制公開發行,學者:成本勢必增加,引發爭議(二版)。
經濟日報,2007/5/2,社論:強制公開發行真能防弊嗎(二版)。
吳林, 2004,「是否該回復強制公開發行之規定」,證券櫃臺月刊,第93期,33-44。
林嬋娟與王泓達,2006,我國企業撤銷公開發行之研究,會計理論與實務研討會論文,國立台灣大學會計學系。
林嬋娟、劉啟群與陳俊合,2004,我國企業公開發行之實證研究-資本額門檻與規避公開」,證券市場發展季刊,第16卷第2期,43-80。
劉敬業,1999,台灣公開發行公司交叉持股之探索,東吳大學會計學研究所。
劉連煜,1997,強制公開發行股份之政策與公開發行公司之界定,法學叢刊,第167期,48-56。
劉連煜,1998,強制公開發行股份之政策與公開發行公司之界定,戴氏著,公司法理論與判決研究(二),81-102。
薛立敏,2000,公司法不應強制公司公開發行,經濟前瞻,第72期,92-95。
戚務君與陳宜伶,2006,資本市場對盈餘品質的影響:來自台灣的證據,會計理論與實務研討會論文,國立政治大學會計學系。
Ball, and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earning quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 83-128.
Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24:3-37.
Beatty, A. L., B. Ke, R. Petroni. 2002. Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review 77(July):547-570.
Bhattachary, U., H. Daouk, and M. Welker. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review 78(July):641-678.
Burgstahler, D., L. Hail and C. Leus. 2006. The importance of reporting incentives: earning management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review.
Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichew. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decrease and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(December):99-126.
Bushman, R., and J. Piotroski. 2006. Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions. Journal of Accounting and Economics.
DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo and E. Rice, 1984, “Going Private: Minority Freeze Outs and Stockholders’ Wealth,” Journal of Law and Economics, 27, 367-402.
Degeorge, F., J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business 72(January):1-33.
Francis, R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79(October):967-1010.
Jensen, M., 1989, “Eclipse of the Public Corporations,” Harvard Business Review, 67, 61-74.
Lehn, K. and A. Poulsen, 1989, “Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions,” Journal of Finance, 44 (3), 771-787.
Marosi, A., and N., Massoud, 2004, “Why Do Firms Go Dark?” Working Paper, University of Alberta.
Muscarella, C.J. and M.R. Vetsuypens, 1990, “Efficiency and Organizational Structure: A Study of Reverse LBOs,” Journal of Finance, 45 (5), 1389-1413.
Pagano, M. and A. Roell, 1998, “The Choice of Stock Ownership Structure: Agency Costs, Monitoring and the Decision to Go Public,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (1), 187-225.
Pagano, M., F. Panetta and L. Zingales, 1998, “Why Do Companies Go Public ? An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Finance, 53 (1), 27-64.
Peek, E., R. Cuijpers, and W. Buijink. 2006. Creditors’ and shareholders’ demand for accounting conservatism in public versus firms: Evidence from Europe. Working paper, Maastricht University.
Ritter, J. R., 1987, “The Cost of Going Public,” Journal of Financial Economics, 19, 269-281.
Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong, 1998a, Earnings management and the long-term market performance of initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 53(December):1935-1974.
Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong, 1998b, Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offering, Journal of Finance Economics 50:63-99.
Weir, C. and D. Laing, 2004, “Going Private Transactions and Corporate Governance in the UK,” Working Paper, The Robert Gordon University.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
94353015
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353015
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 戚務君zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蘇俞維zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 蘇俞維zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:26:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:26:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:26:19 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094353015en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30198-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94353015zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要在探討「強制公開制度對財務報表品質的影響」。強制公司公開發行是否有其必要性一直是各界所爭論的議題,藉著研究繼續保持公開發行與撤銷公開發行二類公司盈餘品質之異同,本研究提供證據證明強制公開發行此一政策是否有效。本研究用來衡量盈餘品質之代理變數有盈餘穩健性及避免負盈餘,實證結果顯示在控制規模的影響後,繼續公開發行公司之盈餘穩健性較撤銷公開發行公司為佳。而在避免負盈餘方面,二類公司都有避免負盈餘的傾向,唯二類公司差異並不顯著。本研究之結果顯示,我們無法要求自願公開與受法令規定而公開發行此二類公司有相同的盈餘品質,我期望本研究之結果能做為主管機關在制定相關法令時之參考依據。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The main purpose of this study is to examine the impact of force the company public on the quality of financial report. We provide evidence that the policy of force the company public is effectiveness or not. This study uses earnings conservatism and likelihood of negative earrings benchmark as dependent variables. The results show that, after controlling firm size effect, earnings quality of keeping public firms is better than that of going private firms in earnings conservatism. So it concludes that people are unable to request the two kinds firms to have the same earnings quality, I expects that this finding can be a reference when government legislates the related law.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 摘要 i
     第壹章 、緒論 1
     第一節 、研究動機與目的 1
     第二節 、研究問題 3
     第三節 、研究架構 5
     第貳章 、背景介紹 7
     第一節 、公開發行之定義 7
     第二節 、強制公開制度之沿革 11
     第參章 、文獻探討 20
     第一節 、與盈餘品質相關之文獻 20
     第二節 、有關資本市場對盈餘品質的影響 20
     第三節 、我國公開發行公司相關之研究 22
     第四節 、自願性下市與撤銷公開發行相關研究之探討 23
     第肆章 、研究方法 27
     第一節 、研究假說 27
     第二節 、實證模型 30
     第三節 、樣本選擇與資料來源 33
     第伍章 、實證結果 35
     第一節 、基本敘述統計量與相關係數 35
     第二節 、盈餘穩健性 37
     第三節 、避免負盈餘 40
     第四節 、敏感性分析 41
     第陸章 、結論與建議 46
     第一節 研究結論 46
     第二節 研究建議 48
     附錄 49
     參考文獻 50
     
     
     
     
     
     表目錄
     表一 我國公司法有關股票公開發行之立法沿革 12
     表二 近年撤銷公開發行公司家數統計 15
     表三 上市、上櫃、興櫃、與ㄧ般公開發行公司近年家數統計表 16
     表四 已撤銷與未撤銷公開發行公司資本額前40大公司之基本統計量 18
     表五 基本敘述統計量 36
     表六 相關係數矩陣 37
     表七 會計穩健性迴歸分析 39
     表八 避免負盈餘分析 41
     表九 會計穩健性迴歸分析 44
     表十 避免負盈餘分析 45
     圖目錄
     圖 2 1 我國強制公開發行制度之沿革 12
     圖 2 2 近年未上市櫃公開發行公司家數 14
     圖 3 1 樣本選取說明 29
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094353015en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 盈餘品質zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) earnings qualityen_US
dc.title (題名) 繼續保持公開發行與撤銷公開發行二類公司盈餘品質異同之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 經濟日報,2003/10/31,企業強制公開發行,學者:成本勢必增加,引發爭議(二版)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 經濟日報,2007/5/2,社論:強制公開發行真能防弊嗎(二版)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳林, 2004,「是否該回復強制公開發行之規定」,證券櫃臺月刊,第93期,33-44。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林嬋娟與王泓達,2006,我國企業撤銷公開發行之研究,會計理論與實務研討會論文,國立台灣大學會計學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林嬋娟、劉啟群與陳俊合,2004,我國企業公開發行之實證研究-資本額門檻與規避公開」,證券市場發展季刊,第16卷第2期,43-80。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉敬業,1999,台灣公開發行公司交叉持股之探索,東吳大學會計學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉連煜,1997,強制公開發行股份之政策與公開發行公司之界定,法學叢刊,第167期,48-56。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉連煜,1998,強制公開發行股份之政策與公開發行公司之界定,戴氏著,公司法理論與判決研究(二),81-102。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 薛立敏,2000,公司法不應強制公司公開發行,經濟前瞻,第72期,92-95。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 戚務君與陳宜伶,2006,資本市場對盈餘品質的影響:來自台灣的證據,會計理論與實務研討會論文,國立政治大學會計學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ball, and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earning quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39: 83-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24:3-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beatty, A. L., B. Ke, R. Petroni. 2002. Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review 77(July):547-570.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhattachary, U., H. Daouk, and M. Welker. 2003. The world price of earnings opacity. The Accounting Review 78(July):641-678.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burgstahler, D., L. Hail and C. Leus. 2006. The importance of reporting incentives: earning management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichew. 1997. Earnings management to avoid earnings decrease and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24(December):99-126.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bushman, R., and J. Piotroski. 2006. Financial reporting incentives for conservative accounting: The influence of legal and political institutions. Journal of Accounting and Economics.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo and E. Rice, 1984, “Going Private: Minority Freeze Outs and Stockholders’ Wealth,” Journal of Law and Economics, 27, 367-402.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Degeorge, F., J. Patel, and R. Zeckhauser. 1999. Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business 72(January):1-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Francis, R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2004. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79(October):967-1010.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, M., 1989, “Eclipse of the Public Corporations,” Harvard Business Review, 67, 61-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lehn, K. and A. Poulsen, 1989, “Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions,” Journal of Finance, 44 (3), 771-787.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marosi, A., and N., Massoud, 2004, “Why Do Firms Go Dark?” Working Paper, University of Alberta.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Muscarella, C.J. and M.R. Vetsuypens, 1990, “Efficiency and Organizational Structure: A Study of Reverse LBOs,” Journal of Finance, 45 (5), 1389-1413.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pagano, M. and A. Roell, 1998, “The Choice of Stock Ownership Structure: Agency Costs, Monitoring and the Decision to Go Public,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113 (1), 187-225.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pagano, M., F. Panetta and L. Zingales, 1998, “Why Do Companies Go Public ? An Empirical Analysis,” Journal of Finance, 53 (1), 27-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peek, E., R. Cuijpers, and W. Buijink. 2006. Creditors’ and shareholders’ demand for accounting conservatism in public versus firms: Evidence from Europe. Working paper, Maastricht University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ritter, J. R., 1987, “The Cost of Going Public,” Journal of Financial Economics, 19, 269-281.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong, 1998a, Earnings management and the long-term market performance of initial public offerings, Journal of Finance 53(December):1935-1974.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong, 1998b, Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offering, Journal of Finance Economics 50:63-99.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weir, C. and D. Laing, 2004, “Going Private Transactions and Corporate Governance in the UK,” Working Paper, The Robert Gordon University.zh_TW