學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 撤銷上市櫃輔導公司盈餘品質之探討
作者 劉采薇
貢獻者 林宛瑩
劉采薇
關鍵詞 盈餘品質
公開發行公司
撤銷上市櫃輔導
earnings quality
public firms
cancellation of listing guidance application
日期 2007
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:30:15 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究主要針對我國上市櫃輔導之制度,探討撤銷上市(櫃)輔導公司之中,獲准上市(櫃)之公開發行公司,與其他自願撤銷輔導上市櫃之公開發行公司相較,於撤銷輔導上市櫃之前二年至後二年的研究期間,兩者之間的盈餘品質是否存在差異。
     實證結果顯示,以損失認列時效性迴歸模型分析時,獲准上市(櫃)之公開發行公司較自願撤銷輔導上市櫃之公開發行公司有較佳的盈餘品質;以盈餘時效性迴歸模型分析時,自願撤銷輔導上市櫃之公開發行公司較獲准上市(櫃)之公開發行公司有較佳的盈餘品質。本研究推論此分歧結果,由我國臺灣證券交易所股份有限公司有價證券上市審查準則與財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心證券商營業處所買賣有價證券審查準則對於申請上市(櫃)之獲利門檻要求所造成。
Based on regulations on listing guidance released by the Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation (TSEC) mission, this study investigates the difference in earnings quality between firms that voluntarily cancel their listing guidance applications and firm that complete their initial public offerings (IPOs) over the period of two years prior to the cancellation and two years after the cancellation of listing guidance application.
     The results show that, under timeliness in loss recognition regression model, using a two-year duration prior to the IPO or listing guidance application cancellation for research period, the earnings quality of IPO firms over the two-year-period prior to their IPOs is better than that of firms voluntarily cancelled their listing guidance applications. On the contrary, under timeliness in earnings regression model, earnings quality of firms cancelled their listing guidance application voluntarily is better than that of the IPO firms. The empirical evidence thus suggests that the inconsistence on earnings quality measured in terms of loss and earnings recognition may due to the profitability threshold imposed by TSEC and GreTai Securities Market on rules governing the review of stock listings.
參考文獻 一、 中文部份
李建然、羅元銘,2002,新上市公司上市後營運績效衰退原因之探討,財務金融
學刊,第10卷第1期,頁23-52。
金成隆、林修葳、張永芳,1999,強制性財務預測誤差與盈餘管理關係:20﹪門
檻限制影響之研究,財務金融學刊,第7卷第1期,頁19-96。
許永聲、劉政准,2005,盈餘的資訊品質對盈餘管理行為的影響,管理與系統,
第12卷第1期,頁1-22。
二、 英文部分
Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 : 83-128.
Basu, S., 1997. The conservatism principle and asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 3–37.
Burgstahler, D. C., L. Hail, and C. Leuz. 2006. The importance of reporting incentives: earnings management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review81: 983-1016.
Chen, K. C. W., and H. Yuan. 2004. Earnings management and capital resource allocation: Evidence from China`s accounting-based regulation of rights issue. The Accounting Review: 645-665.
DeAngelo. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes:a study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61: 400-420.
Dechow, P.M., Kothari, S.P., Watts, R.L., 1998. The relation between earnings and cash flow. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25: 133–168.
Dhaliwal, D. 1980. The effect of the firm`s capital structure on the choice of accounting methods. The Accounting Review 55(1): 78-84.
Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2003. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79: 967-1010.
Healy, P., J. Waheln .1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons: 365-383.
Leuz, C., D. Nanda, and P. D. Wysocki. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69: 505-527.
Lipe, R. 1990. The relation between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information. The Accounting Review 65(1): 49-71.
Moses, O. D. 1987. Income smoothing and incentives:Empirical test using accounting changes. The Accounting Review 53(2): 358-377.
Peasnell, K. V. 1998. Earnings manipulation using asset sales:An international study of countries allowing noncurrent asset revaluation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 25: 1319-1324.
Penman, S. 2001. Financial Statement Analysis & Security Valuation, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Ritter, J. 1991. The long-run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance 46: 3-27.
Schipper, K. 1989. Earnings management. Accounting Horizons 3: 91-102.
Schipper, K., and L. Vincent. 2003. Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons: 97-110.
Teoh, S. H., I. Welch, and T. J. Wong. 1998. Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance 6: 1935-1974.
Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53: 112-134.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
95353043
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095353043
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林宛瑩zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 劉采薇zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 劉采薇zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:30:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:30:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:30:15 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0095353043en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30234-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95353043zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要針對我國上市櫃輔導之制度,探討撤銷上市(櫃)輔導公司之中,獲准上市(櫃)之公開發行公司,與其他自願撤銷輔導上市櫃之公開發行公司相較,於撤銷輔導上市櫃之前二年至後二年的研究期間,兩者之間的盈餘品質是否存在差異。
     實證結果顯示,以損失認列時效性迴歸模型分析時,獲准上市(櫃)之公開發行公司較自願撤銷輔導上市櫃之公開發行公司有較佳的盈餘品質;以盈餘時效性迴歸模型分析時,自願撤銷輔導上市櫃之公開發行公司較獲准上市(櫃)之公開發行公司有較佳的盈餘品質。本研究推論此分歧結果,由我國臺灣證券交易所股份有限公司有價證券上市審查準則與財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心證券商營業處所買賣有價證券審查準則對於申請上市(櫃)之獲利門檻要求所造成。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Based on regulations on listing guidance released by the Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation (TSEC) mission, this study investigates the difference in earnings quality between firms that voluntarily cancel their listing guidance applications and firm that complete their initial public offerings (IPOs) over the period of two years prior to the cancellation and two years after the cancellation of listing guidance application.
     The results show that, under timeliness in loss recognition regression model, using a two-year duration prior to the IPO or listing guidance application cancellation for research period, the earnings quality of IPO firms over the two-year-period prior to their IPOs is better than that of firms voluntarily cancelled their listing guidance applications. On the contrary, under timeliness in earnings regression model, earnings quality of firms cancelled their listing guidance application voluntarily is better than that of the IPO firms. The empirical evidence thus suggests that the inconsistence on earnings quality measured in terms of loss and earnings recognition may due to the profitability threshold imposed by TSEC and GreTai Securities Market on rules governing the review of stock listings.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究動機與目的 1
     第二節 研究問題與研究架構 5
     第二章 文獻探討 9
     第一節 盈餘管理動機與方法之相關文獻 9
     第二節 盈餘品質及其相關文獻 16
     第三章 研究方法 21
     第一節 研究假說 21
     第二節 研究期間與資料來源 23
     第三節 實證模型 24
     第四節 變數定義與衡量 30
     第四章 實證結果與分析 33
     第一節 損失認列時效性迴歸結果 33
     第二節 盈餘時效性迴歸結果 54
     第五章 結論與建議 71
     第一節 研究結論 71
     第二節 研究限制及未來研究建議 72
     參考文獻 73
     附錄A 75
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095353043en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 盈餘品質zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公開發行公司zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 撤銷上市櫃輔導zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) earnings qualityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) public firmsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) cancellation of listing guidance applicationen_US
dc.title (題名) 撤銷上市櫃輔導公司盈餘品質之探討zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李建然、羅元銘,2002,新上市公司上市後營運績效衰退原因之探討,財務金融zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 學刊,第10卷第1期,頁23-52。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 金成隆、林修葳、張永芳,1999,強制性財務預測誤差與盈餘管理關係:20﹪門zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 檻限制影響之研究,財務金融學刊,第7卷第1期,頁19-96。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許永聲、劉政准,2005,盈餘的資訊品質對盈餘管理行為的影響,管理與系統,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 第12卷第1期,頁1-22。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ball, R., and L. Shivakumar. 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 : 83-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Basu, S., 1997. The conservatism principle and asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24: 3–37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burgstahler, D. C., L. Hail, and C. Leuz. 2006. The importance of reporting incentives: earnings management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review81: 983-1016.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, K. C. W., and H. Yuan. 2004. Earnings management and capital resource allocation: Evidence from China`s accounting-based regulation of rights issue. The Accounting Review: 645-665.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo. 1986. Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes:a study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review 61: 400-420.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dechow, P.M., Kothari, S.P., Watts, R.L., 1998. The relation between earnings and cash flow. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25: 133–168.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dhaliwal, D. 1980. The effect of the firm`s capital structure on the choice of accounting methods. The Accounting Review 55(1): 78-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Francis, J., R. LaFond, P. Olsson, and K. Schipper. 2003. Cost of equity and earnings attributes. The Accounting Review 79: 967-1010.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Healy, P., J. Waheln .1999. A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons: 365-383.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leuz, C., D. Nanda, and P. D. Wysocki. 2003. Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics 69: 505-527.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lipe, R. 1990. The relation between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information. The Accounting Review 65(1): 49-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moses, O. D. 1987. Income smoothing and incentives:Empirical test using accounting changes. The Accounting Review 53(2): 358-377.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peasnell, K. V. 1998. Earnings manipulation using asset sales:An international study of countries allowing noncurrent asset revaluation. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 25: 1319-1324.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Penman, S. 2001. Financial Statement Analysis & Security Valuation, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ritter, J. 1991. The long-run performance of initial public offerings. Journal of Finance 46: 3-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schipper, K. 1989. Earnings management. Accounting Horizons 3: 91-102.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schipper, K., and L. Vincent. 2003. Earnings quality. Accounting Horizons: 97-110.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teoh, S. H., I. Welch, and T. J. Wong. 1998. Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance 6: 1935-1974.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watts, R., and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. The Accounting Review 53: 112-134.zh_TW