Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 第三十四號公報重分類盈餘管理動機與財務報表價值攸關性之研究
作者 周吟霞
貢獻者 蘇瓜藤
周吟霞
關鍵詞 重分類
盈餘管理
公司治理
價值攸關性
Reclassification
Earnings management
Value relevance
Corporate governance
日期 2008
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:32:51 (UTC+8)
摘要 為因應金融風暴所造成的金融資產巨大評價損失,國際會計準則委員會於2008年10月13日發布有關金融資產重分類的修正條文,我國財務會計準則委員會因而亦於2008年10月17日隨之修訂第34號準則,並發布金融資產重分類之新規定。然而公司管理當局是否利用對金融資產重分類而進行盈餘管理,可能隨著公司治理良窳而有不同,是一個有待實證之問題。
     
      本研究旨是探討根據修訂之會計準則而重分類金融資產的財務報表資訊,是否仍具價值攸關性或只是淪為盈餘操縱的手段。首先,本研究探討公司管理當局是否於97年度第3季追溯對金融資產重分類。其次,本研究分析追溯重分類財務報表資訊之價值攸關性及其相對變化。
     實證結果如下:
     (1)當公司績效愈好或愈差時,公司管理當局較不傾向對金融資產進行重分類以操縱盈餘。
     (2)當公司董事會相對較獨立時,公司管理當局較不傾向對金融資產進行重分類。
     (3)採用重分類之財務報表仍具價值攸關性。
     
     關鍵字:重分類、盈餘管理、公司治理、價值攸關性
To respond to the financial crisis that caused huge losses of financial assets to companies, the IASB announced, on October 13, 2008, amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 7 “Reclassification of Financial Assets”. As a result, Taiwan’s FASB also announced, on October 17, 2008, amendments to its SFAS No.34. It is therefore an empirical question whether or not firms in Taiwan managed earnings by retroactively reclassifying financial assets on financial statements, that likely depends on the soundness of corporate governance.
     
      This research aims to examine the value relevance of financial statements information after the retroactive reclassification of financial assets based on the revised SFAS No. 34. Firstly, this research investigates whether or not listed firms in Taiwan retroactively adopted SFAS No. 34. Secondly, this research examines the value relevance of their reclassified financial statements and the association with corporate governance.
     
      The empirical results are as follows. Firstly, the better or worse a firm performed, the less it would be willing to retroactively adopt the revised SFAS No. 34. Secondly, the more independent its board of directors, the less it would be willing to to retroactively adopt the revised SFAS No. 34. Finally, the reclassified financial statements were still value relevant.
     
     Keywords: Reclassification, Earnings management, Value
      relevance, Corporate governance.
參考文獻 中文文獻:
江明潔,1999年,可轉換公司債績效與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立中正大學
會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
李宣進,1996年,再探審計品質與盈餘反應係數之關聯,東吳大學會計研究所
未出版碩士論文。
林郁昕,2001年,財務資訊與無形資產密集企業價值攸關性之探討,國立政治 大學會計系碩士論文。
林凱鴻,2001年,盈餘、帳面價值攸關性研究-考慮規模效果-,國立台灣大 學會計系碩士論文。
財團法人中華民國會計研究基金會 ,2005年,財務會計準則公報第36號「金融商品之表達與揭露」,台北:財務會計則委員會。
財團法人中華民國會計研究基金會 ,2006年,財務會計準則公報第1號「財務會計觀念架構及財務報表之編製」,台北:財務會計則委員會。
財團法人中華民國會計研究基金會 ,2008年,財務會計準則公報第34號「金融商品之會計處理準則」,台北:財務會計則委員會。
陳欣怡,2005年,金融商品會計處理準則及未來修訂方向,會計研究月刊,第
232期:62-67。
陳紫雲,2008年,公平價值會計—觀念之澄清,會計研究月刊,第271期:32-33。
陳紫雲,2008年,全球公平價值會計大戰,會計研究月刊,第276期:58-63。
陳紫雲,2008年,喜歡與否,公平價值會計已崛起,會計研究月刊,第267期:30-33。
陳錦烽,1996年,衍生性金融商品的使用及財務報導,會計研究月刊,第126期:89-99。
莊蕎安,2008年,金融危機 錯在會計?會計研究月刊,第276期:52-57。
黃金澤,2007年,談公平價值衡量之基準(上),會計研究月刊,第256期:108-116。
黃金澤,2007年,談公平價值衡量之基準(下),會計研究月刊,第257期:123-129。
葉銀華、柯承恩、李德冠,2002年,公司監理機制對於關係人交易的影響,
台北:台灣財務金融學會。
歐進士、李佳玲與詹茂昆,2004年,我國企業盈餘管理與經營風險關聯性之實證研究,風險管理學報,第6卷第2期(7月):181-206。
英文文獻:
Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996.Value-Relevance of Non-Financial Information: The Wireless Communication Industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 3-30.
Ahemd, K., M. Hossain, and M. B. Adams. 2006. The Effects of Board Composition and Board Size on the Informativeness of Annual Accounting Earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 (September): 418-431.
Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6: 159-177.
Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 1998. Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Value and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health. Journal of Accounting and Economic 25: 1-34.
Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 2001. The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 77-104.
Basu, S. 1997. The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (December): 3-37.
Beasley, M. S. 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (Oct): 443-465.
Beaver, W. H. 1968. The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 6: 67-92.
Beidleman, C. R. 1973. Income Smoothing: The Role of Management. The Accounting Review 48 (October): 653-667.
Benston, G. 1985. The Market for Public Accounting Services, Demand, Supply, and Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 4: 33-79.
Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings, adaptation, and equity value. The
Accounting Review 72: 187-215.
Bushman R., Q. Chen, E. Engel, and A. Smith. 2004. Financial Accounting Information, Organizational Complexity and Corporate Governance Systems. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (June): 167-201.
Chen, K. Y., R. J. Elder, and Y. M. Hsieh. 2005. Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: The Implications of Corporate Governance Best-Practice Principles for Taiwanese Listed Companies. Working paper, National Cheng Kung University.
Chung, R., M. Firth, and J. B. Kim. 2002. Institutional Monitoring and Opportunistic Earnings Management. Journal of Corporate Finance 8 (January): 29-48.
Collins, D. W., E. L. Maydew, and I. S. Weiss. 1997. Change in the Value-Relevance
of Earning and Book Values over the Past Forty Years. Journal of Accounting
and Economics 24: 39-67.
Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (March): 371-406.
Daley, L. A., and R. L. Vigeland. 1983. The Effects of Debt Covenants and Political Costs on the Choice of Accounting Methods:The Case of Accounting for R&D Costs. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 195-211.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor Independence, “Low Balling”, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3: 113-127.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1986. Accounting Numbers as Market Valuation Substitutes:A study of Management Buyouts of Public Stockholders. The Accounting Review July: 400-420.
Dechow, P. M., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193-225.
Dechow, P. M., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (Spring): 1-36.
Dhaliwal, D. S. 1980. The Effect of the Firms Capital Structure on the Choice of
Accounting Methods. The Accounting Review 7: 78-84.
Duncker, K. 1945. On Problem Solving. Psychological Monographs 58 (270).
Francis, J., and K. Schipper. 1999. Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 319-352.
Hayn, C. 1995. The Information Content of Losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20: 125-153.
Healy, P. M. 1985. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decision. Journal of Accounting and Economics April: 85-107.
Healy, P., and J. Wahlen. 1999. A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting. Accounting Horizons 13: 365-383.
Hepworth, S. R. 1953. Smooth Period Income. The Accounting Review 29: 32-39.
Ijiri, Y., R. K. Jaedicke, and K. E. Knight. 1966. The Effects of Accounting Alternatives on Management Decisions. Research in Accounting Measurements, Evanston, IL, American Accounting Association: 186-199.
Jones, J. 1991. Earnings Management During Import Relied Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29: 193-228.
Kinney, M., and R. Trezevant. 1997. The Use of Special Items to Manage Earnings and Perceptions. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis 3 (Fall): 45-53.
Moses, O. D. 1987. Income Smoothing and Incentives: Empirical Test Using Accounting Changes. The Accounting Review 53 (2): 358-377.
Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 27: 661-687.
Peasnell, K. V., P. F. Pope, and S. Young. 2001.Board Monitoring and Earnings Management: Do Outside Directors Influence Abnormal Accruals? Working paper, Lancaster University.
Rangan, S. 1998. Earnings before Seasoned Equity Offerings: Are They Overstated? Journal of Financial Economics 50: 101-122.
Riedl, J. E. 2004. An Examination of Long-Lived Asset Impairments. The Accounting Review 79 (July): 823-852.
Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on Earnings Management. Accounting Horizons 3(4): 91-102.
Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance 52 (June): 737-83.
Subramanyam, K. R. 1996. The Pricing of Discretionary Accruals. Journal of Financial Economics 22 (August-December): 249-281.
Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong. 1993. Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Respones Coefficient. The Accounting Review (April): 346-666.
Teoh, S., I. Welch, and T. Wong. 1998. Earnings Management and The Underperformance of Seasoned Equity Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50 (1): 63-99.
Tirole, J. 2001. Corporate Governance. Econometrica 69 (January): 1-35.
Vafeas, N. 2000. Board Structure and the Informativeness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19 (June): 139-160.
Vafeas, N. 2005. Audit Committees, Boards and the Quality of Reported Earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 22 (Winter): 1093-1122.
Watts, R. and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review 53 (January): 112-133.
Xie, B., W. N. Davidson III, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9 (June): 295-316.
Yeo, G. H. H., P. M. S. Tan, K. W. Ho, and S. S. Chen. 2002. Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Earnings. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 29 (September): 1023-1046.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
96353037
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096353037
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 蘇瓜藤zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 周吟霞zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 周吟霞zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:32:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:32:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:32:51 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096353037en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30257-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96353037zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 為因應金融風暴所造成的金融資產巨大評價損失,國際會計準則委員會於2008年10月13日發布有關金融資產重分類的修正條文,我國財務會計準則委員會因而亦於2008年10月17日隨之修訂第34號準則,並發布金融資產重分類之新規定。然而公司管理當局是否利用對金融資產重分類而進行盈餘管理,可能隨著公司治理良窳而有不同,是一個有待實證之問題。
     
      本研究旨是探討根據修訂之會計準則而重分類金融資產的財務報表資訊,是否仍具價值攸關性或只是淪為盈餘操縱的手段。首先,本研究探討公司管理當局是否於97年度第3季追溯對金融資產重分類。其次,本研究分析追溯重分類財務報表資訊之價值攸關性及其相對變化。
     實證結果如下:
     (1)當公司績效愈好或愈差時,公司管理當局較不傾向對金融資產進行重分類以操縱盈餘。
     (2)當公司董事會相對較獨立時,公司管理當局較不傾向對金融資產進行重分類。
     (3)採用重分類之財務報表仍具價值攸關性。
     
     關鍵字:重分類、盈餘管理、公司治理、價值攸關性
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) To respond to the financial crisis that caused huge losses of financial assets to companies, the IASB announced, on October 13, 2008, amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 7 “Reclassification of Financial Assets”. As a result, Taiwan’s FASB also announced, on October 17, 2008, amendments to its SFAS No.34. It is therefore an empirical question whether or not firms in Taiwan managed earnings by retroactively reclassifying financial assets on financial statements, that likely depends on the soundness of corporate governance.
     
      This research aims to examine the value relevance of financial statements information after the retroactive reclassification of financial assets based on the revised SFAS No. 34. Firstly, this research investigates whether or not listed firms in Taiwan retroactively adopted SFAS No. 34. Secondly, this research examines the value relevance of their reclassified financial statements and the association with corporate governance.
     
      The empirical results are as follows. Firstly, the better or worse a firm performed, the less it would be willing to retroactively adopt the revised SFAS No. 34. Secondly, the more independent its board of directors, the less it would be willing to to retroactively adopt the revised SFAS No. 34. Finally, the reclassified financial statements were still value relevant.
     
     Keywords: Reclassification, Earnings management, Value
      relevance, Corporate governance.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 謝辭 ……………………………………………………………………I
     摘要 ……………………………………………………………………II
     圖目錄 …………………………………………………………………V
     表目錄 …………………………………………………………………VI
     第壹章 緒論 ………………………………………………………… 1
     第一節 研究背景與動機………………………………………………1
     第二節 研究目的………………………………………………………3
     第三節 研究架構與研究流程 ………………………………………4
     第四節 預期貢獻……………………………………………………7
     第貳章 文獻探討………………………………………………………9
     第一節 準則制定沿革…………………………………………………9
     第二節 盈餘管理之動機及其衡量方法………………………………26
     第三節 公司治理相關文獻……………………………………………30
     第四節 財務報表之價值攸關性………………………………………34
     第參章 研究方法………………………………………………………43
     第一節 研究假說………………………………………………………43
     第二節 實證模型………………………………………………………53
     第三節 樣本選取與資料來源…………………………………………61
     第肆章 實證結果與分析………………………………………………64
     第一節 敘述性統計量分析……………………………………………65
     第二節 相關係數分析…………………………………………………67
     第三節 迴歸分析………………………………………………………69
     第四節 敏感性分析……………………………………………………75
     第伍章 結論與建議……………………………………………………77
     第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………77
     第二節 研究限制………………………………………………………77
     第三節 後續研究建議…………………………………………………78
     參考文獻 …………………………………………………………………79
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096353037en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 重分類zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 盈餘管理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 價值攸關性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Reclassificationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Earnings managementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Value relevanceen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Corporate governanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 第三十四號公報重分類盈餘管理動機與財務報表價值攸關性之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文文獻:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江明潔,1999年,可轉換公司債績效與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立中正大學zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李宣進,1996年,再探審計品質與盈餘反應係數之關聯,東吳大學會計研究所zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林郁昕,2001年,財務資訊與無形資產密集企業價值攸關性之探討,國立政治 大學會計系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林凱鴻,2001年,盈餘、帳面價值攸關性研究-考慮規模效果-,國立台灣大 學會計系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 財團法人中華民國會計研究基金會 ,2005年,財務會計準則公報第36號「金融商品之表達與揭露」,台北:財務會計則委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 財團法人中華民國會計研究基金會 ,2006年,財務會計準則公報第1號「財務會計觀念架構及財務報表之編製」,台北:財務會計則委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 財團法人中華民國會計研究基金會 ,2008年,財務會計準則公報第34號「金融商品之會計處理準則」,台北:財務會計則委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳欣怡,2005年,金融商品會計處理準則及未來修訂方向,會計研究月刊,第zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 232期:62-67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳紫雲,2008年,公平價值會計—觀念之澄清,會計研究月刊,第271期:32-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳紫雲,2008年,全球公平價值會計大戰,會計研究月刊,第276期:58-63。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳紫雲,2008年,喜歡與否,公平價值會計已崛起,會計研究月刊,第267期:30-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳錦烽,1996年,衍生性金融商品的使用及財務報導,會計研究月刊,第126期:89-99。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 莊蕎安,2008年,金融危機 錯在會計?會計研究月刊,第276期:52-57。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃金澤,2007年,談公平價值衡量之基準(上),會計研究月刊,第256期:108-116。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃金澤,2007年,談公平價值衡量之基準(下),會計研究月刊,第257期:123-129。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉銀華、柯承恩、李德冠,2002年,公司監理機制對於關係人交易的影響,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台北:台灣財務金融學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 歐進士、李佳玲與詹茂昆,2004年,我國企業盈餘管理與經營風險關聯性之實證研究,風險管理學報,第6卷第2期(7月):181-206。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文文獻:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996.Value-Relevance of Non-Financial Information: The Wireless Communication Industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22: 3-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ahemd, K., M. Hossain, and M. B. Adams. 2006. The Effects of Board Composition and Board Size on the Informativeness of Annual Accounting Earnings. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14 (September): 418-431.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6: 159-177.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 1998. Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Value and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health. Journal of Accounting and Economic 25: 1-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barth, M. E., W. H. Beaver, and W. R. Landsman. 2001. The Relevance of the Value Relevance Literature for Financial Accounting Standard Setting: Another View. Journal of Accounting and Economics 31: 77-104.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Basu, S. 1997. The Conservatism Principle and the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 24 (December): 3-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beasley, M. S. 1996. An Empirical Analysis of the Relation Between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud. The Accounting Review 71 (Oct): 443-465.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beaver, W. H. 1968. The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 6: 67-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beidleman, C. R. 1973. Income Smoothing: The Role of Management. The Accounting Review 48 (October): 653-667.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Benston, G. 1985. The Market for Public Accounting Services, Demand, Supply, and Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 4: 33-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burgstahler, D., and I. Dichev. 1997. Earnings, adaptation, and equity value. Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Accounting Review 72: 187-215.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bushman R., Q. Chen, E. Engel, and A. Smith. 2004. Financial Accounting Information, Organizational Complexity and Corporate Governance Systems. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (June): 167-201.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, K. Y., R. J. Elder, and Y. M. Hsieh. 2005. Corporate Governance and Earnings Management: The Implications of Corporate Governance Best-Practice Principles for Taiwanese Listed Companies. Working paper, National Cheng Kung University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chung, R., M. Firth, and J. B. Kim. 2002. Institutional Monitoring and Opportunistic Earnings Management. Journal of Corporate Finance 8 (January): 29-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Collins, D. W., E. L. Maydew, and I. S. Weiss. 1997. Change in the Value-Relevancezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) of Earning and Book Values over the Past Forty Years. Journal of Accountingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and Economics 24: 39-67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51 (March): 371-406.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Daley, L. A., and R. L. Vigeland. 1983. The Effects of Debt Covenants and Political Costs on the Choice of Accounting Methods:The Case of Accounting for R&D Costs. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 195-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor Independence, “Low Balling”, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3: 113-127.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo, L. E. 1986. Accounting Numbers as Market Valuation Substitutes:A study of Management Buyouts of Public Stockholders. The Accounting Review July: 400-420.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dechow, P. M., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting Earnings Management. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 193-225.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dechow, P. M., R. Sloan, and A. Sweeney. 1996. Causes and Consequences of Earnings Manipulation: An Analysis of Firms Subject to Enforcement Actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (Spring): 1-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dhaliwal, D. S. 1980. The Effect of the Firms Capital Structure on the Choice ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Accounting Methods. The Accounting Review 7: 78-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duncker, K. 1945. On Problem Solving. Psychological Monographs 58 (270).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Francis, J., and K. Schipper. 1999. Have financial statements lost their relevance? Journal of Accounting and Economics 37: 319-352.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hayn, C. 1995. The Information Content of Losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics 20: 125-153.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Healy, P. M. 1985. The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decision. Journal of Accounting and Economics April: 85-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Healy, P., and J. Wahlen. 1999. A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting. Accounting Horizons 13: 365-383.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hepworth, S. R. 1953. Smooth Period Income. The Accounting Review 29: 32-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ijiri, Y., R. K. Jaedicke, and K. E. Knight. 1966. The Effects of Accounting Alternatives on Management Decisions. Research in Accounting Measurements, Evanston, IL, American Accounting Association: 186-199.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, J. 1991. Earnings Management During Import Relied Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29: 193-228.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kinney, M., and R. Trezevant. 1997. The Use of Special Items to Manage Earnings and Perceptions. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis 3 (Fall): 45-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Moses, O. D. 1987. Income Smoothing and Incentives: Empirical Test Using Accounting Changes. The Accounting Review 53 (2): 358-377.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ohlson, J. A. 1995. Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research 27: 661-687.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peasnell, K. V., P. F. Pope, and S. Young. 2001.Board Monitoring and Earnings Management: Do Outside Directors Influence Abnormal Accruals? Working paper, Lancaster University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rangan, S. 1998. Earnings before Seasoned Equity Offerings: Are They Overstated? Journal of Financial Economics 50: 101-122.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Riedl, J. E. 2004. An Examination of Long-Lived Asset Impairments. The Accounting Review 79 (July): 823-852.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schipper, K. 1989. Commentary on Earnings Management. Accounting Horizons 3(4): 91-102.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance 52 (June): 737-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Subramanyam, K. R. 1996. The Pricing of Discretionary Accruals. Journal of Financial Economics 22 (August-December): 249-281.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teoh, S. H., and T. J. Wong. 1993. Perceived Auditor Quality and the Earnings Respones Coefficient. The Accounting Review (April): 346-666.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teoh, S., I. Welch, and T. Wong. 1998. Earnings Management and The Underperformance of Seasoned Equity Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics 50 (1): 63-99.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tirole, J. 2001. Corporate Governance. Econometrica 69 (January): 1-35.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vafeas, N. 2000. Board Structure and the Informativeness of Earnings. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 19 (June): 139-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vafeas, N. 2005. Audit Committees, Boards and the Quality of Reported Earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 22 (Winter): 1093-1122.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watts, R. and J. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards. The Accounting Review 53 (January): 112-133.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Xie, B., W. N. Davidson III, and P. J. DaDalt. 2003. Earnings Management and Corporate Governance: The Role of the Board and the Audit Committee. Journal of Corporate Finance 9 (June): 295-316.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yeo, G. H. H., P. M. S. Tan, K. W. Ho, and S. S. Chen. 2002. Corporate Ownership Structure and the Informativeness of Earnings. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 29 (September): 1023-1046.zh_TW