Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 私募應募人種類與經營績效之探討
作者 張荷君
貢獻者 張清福
張荷君
關鍵詞 私募
應募人
經營績效
Private placement
Private placement investor
Performance
日期 2008
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:33:17 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究探討私募對企業經營績效之影響,分別檢驗五種類型應募人之私募,其企業經營績效是否因私募而獲得顯著改善。本文採用配對t檢定,檢驗當應募人分別為策略投資人、內部人、積極投資人、消極投資人及單一投資人時,公司之經營績效於私募前後一年是否有顯著差異,並以營運現金流量報酬率、資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率及公司價值作為績效指標進行迴歸分析,探討不同類型應募人之私募,對經營績效之影響有何不同。
     實證結果發現,私募會因應募人之不同,而對經營績效產生不同的影響。當應募人為策略投資人、內部人、積極投資人或單一投資人時,公司私募後一年的經營績效比私募前一年的績效好,表示當應募人為該四類投資人時,四項經營績效衡量指標皆顯示,私募會正面影響公司之經營績效;而當應募人為消極投資人時,私募對公司營運現金流量會造成負面的影響。
This study classifies private placement investors into five types including strategic investors, insiders, active investors, passive investors, and single investors to investigate whether firm performance has been improved after issuing private placement. I use two-sample paired t-test to examine whether the performance is different between pre-placement and post-placement under each type of private placement investors, and use regression approach to analyze the impact of private placement investors on firm performance measured by operating cash flow returns, returns on assets, returns on equity, and Tobin’s Q.
     The evidence shows that the impact on performance varies with private placement investors. Firms have better performance after issuing private placement when the private placement investors are strategic investors, insiders, active investors, and single investors. On the contrary, when the private placement investors are passive investors, firms have poorer operating cash flow returns.
參考文獻 中文部分
呂季蓉,2005,台灣上市上櫃公司私募之研究—論私募對象之影響,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士班碩士論文。
林嘉慧,2007,台灣上市公司私募股權現況與績效之探討,東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。
張文魁,2006,股權結構對私募發行公司價值影響之分析,國立政治大學財務管理學研究所碩士論文。
梁晏慈,2007,論私募公司之折價發行、宣告效果及長期績效表現,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班。
許雪芳,2003,上市上櫃公司私募之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
陸潤生,2005,私募宣告之資訊內涵,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
陸瀛謙,2008,私募折價幅度及私募前後異常報酬,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
英文部分
Allen, J. W., and G. M. Phillips. 2000. Corporate equity ownership, strategic alliances, and product market relationships. The Journal of Finance 55 (December): 2791-2815.
Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan. 2007. Private placements and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Corporate Finance 13 (September): 461-484.
Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan. 2001. The block pricing puzzle. Working paper, Simon School of Business.
Chu, S. M., G. H. Lentz, and E. Robak. 2005. Comparing the characteristics and performance of private equity offering frims with seasoned equity offering firms. Journal of Economics and Management 1 (January): 57-83.
Cronqvist, H., and M. Nilsson. 2005. The choice between rights offerings and private equity placements. Journal of Financial Economics 78 (November): 375-407.
Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt.1994. A simple approximation of tobin`s q. Financial Management 23 (Autumn): 70-74.
Demsetz, H., and K. Lehn. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93 (December): 1155-1177.
Gillan, S. L. and L. T. Starks. 2000. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 57 (August): 275-305.
Hertzel, M. G., M. Lemmon, J. Linck, and L. Rees. 2002. Long-run performance following private placements of equity. Journal of Finance 57 (December): 2595-2617.
Hertzel, M. G., and R. L. Smith. 1993. Market discounts and shareholder gains for placing equity privately. Journal of Finance 48 (June): 459-485.
Healy, P. M., K. G. Palepu, and R. S. Ruback. 1992. Does corporate performance improve after merges? Journal of Financial Economics 31 (April): 135-176.
Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October): 305-360.
Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 5-50.
Krishnamurthy, S., P. Spindt, V. Subramaniam, and T. Woidtke. 2005 Does investor identity matter in equity issues? Evidence from private placements. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14 (April): 210-238.
Leland, H., and D. H. Pyle. 1977. Information asymmetric, financial structure and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance 32 (June): 371-388.
Lindenberg, E. and S. Ross. 1981. Tobin`s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54 (January): 1-32.
Myers, S. C. and N. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics13 (June): 187-221.
Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (January-March): 293-315.
Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94 (June): 461-488.
Tobin, J., and W. C. Brainard. 1977. Asset markets and the cost of capital. Economic progress: Private values and public policy, 235-262. Amsterdam, North-Holland.
Wruck, K. H., and Y. Wu. 2009. Relationships, corporate governance, and performance: Evidence from private placements of common stock. Journal of Corporate Finance 15 (February):30-47.
Wruck, K. H. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics 23 (June): 3-28.
Wu, Y. 2004. The choice of equity-selling mechanisms. Journal of Financial Economics 74 (October): 93-119.
Wahal, S. 1996. Pension fund activism and firm performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31 (March): 1-23.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
96353046
97
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096353046
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 張清福zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 張荷君zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 張荷君zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:33:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:33:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:33:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0096353046en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30261-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96353046zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究探討私募對企業經營績效之影響,分別檢驗五種類型應募人之私募,其企業經營績效是否因私募而獲得顯著改善。本文採用配對t檢定,檢驗當應募人分別為策略投資人、內部人、積極投資人、消極投資人及單一投資人時,公司之經營績效於私募前後一年是否有顯著差異,並以營運現金流量報酬率、資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率及公司價值作為績效指標進行迴歸分析,探討不同類型應募人之私募,對經營績效之影響有何不同。
     實證結果發現,私募會因應募人之不同,而對經營績效產生不同的影響。當應募人為策略投資人、內部人、積極投資人或單一投資人時,公司私募後一年的經營績效比私募前一年的績效好,表示當應募人為該四類投資人時,四項經營績效衡量指標皆顯示,私募會正面影響公司之經營績效;而當應募人為消極投資人時,私募對公司營運現金流量會造成負面的影響。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study classifies private placement investors into five types including strategic investors, insiders, active investors, passive investors, and single investors to investigate whether firm performance has been improved after issuing private placement. I use two-sample paired t-test to examine whether the performance is different between pre-placement and post-placement under each type of private placement investors, and use regression approach to analyze the impact of private placement investors on firm performance measured by operating cash flow returns, returns on assets, returns on equity, and Tobin’s Q.
     The evidence shows that the impact on performance varies with private placement investors. Firms have better performance after issuing private placement when the private placement investors are strategic investors, insiders, active investors, and single investors. On the contrary, when the private placement investors are passive investors, firms have poorer operating cash flow returns.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論................................................1
     第一節 研究動機與目的.......................................1
     第二節 研究問題............................................5
     第三節 研究流程............................................7
     第四節 研究架構............................................8
     第貳章 私募制度與文獻探討...................................9
     第一節 我國私募制度相關規範.................................9
     第二節 私募制度之優缺點....................................14
     第三節 私募制度之運用......................................17
     第四節 文獻探討...........................................20
     第參章 研究方法...........................................34
     第一節 研究假說...........................................34
     第二節 研究對象與期間、資料來源及樣本選取....................40
     第三節 實證模型與變數衡量..................................42
     第肆章 實證結果...........................................48
     第一節 敘述性統計.........................................48
     第二節 策略投資人.........................................54
     第三節 內部人............................................59
     第四節 積極投資人.........................................64
     第五節 消極投資人.........................................69
     第六節 單一投資人.........................................74
     第七節 小樣本檢定.........................................80
     第伍章 結論與建議.........................................82
     第一節 結論..............................................82
     第二節 研究限制..........................................84
     第三節 後續研究建議.......................................85
     參考文獻.................................................86
     圖目錄
     圖1-3-1 研究流程之說明.....................................7
     表目錄
     表3-3-1 變數定義表.......................................47
     表4-1-1 上市(櫃)公司私募樣本之年度分配表....................48
     表4-1-2 上市(櫃)公司私募樣本之產業分配表....................49
     表4-1-3 私募應募人樣本統計量..............................50
     表4-1-4 策略投資人與單一投資人樣本重複情形分配表.............50
     表4-1-5 策略投資人樣本產業分配表...........................51
     表4-1-6 內部人樣本產業分配表...............................51
     表4-1-7 積極投資人樣本產業分配表...........................51
     表4-1-8 消極投資人樣本產業分配表...........................51
     表4-1-9 單一投資人樣本產業分配表...........................52
     表4-1-10 全體樣本變數之敘述性統計...........................52
     表4-2-1 配對t檢定-策略投資...............................54
     表4-2-2 以資產市值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-策略投資人..55
     表4-2-3 以資產帳面值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-策略投資人55
     表4-2-4 資產報酬率迴歸式-策略投資人.......................56
     表4-2-5 股東權益報酬率迴歸式-策略投資人....................56
     表4-2-6 公司價值迴歸式-策略投資人.........................57
     表4-2-7 實證結果彙總表-策略投資人.........................58
     表4-3-1 配對t檢定-內部人.................................59
     表4-3-2 以資產市值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-內部人......60
     表4-3-3 以資產帳面值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-內部人....60
     表4-3-4 資產報酬率迴歸式-內部人...........................61
     表4-3-5 股東權益報酬率迴歸式-內部人........................61
     表4-3-6 公司價值迴歸式-內部人.............................62
     表4-3-7 實證結果彙總表-內部人.............................63
     表4-4-1 配對t檢定-積極投資人..............................64
     表4-4-2 以資產市值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-積極投資人...65
     表4-4-3 以資產帳面值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-積極投資人.65
     表4-4-4 資產報酬率迴歸式-積極投資人........................66
     表4-4-5 股東權益報酬率迴歸式-積極投資人....................66
     表4-4-6 公司價值迴歸式-積極投資人..........................67
     表4-4-7 實證結果彙總表-積極投資人..........................68
     表4-5-1 配對t檢定-消極投資人..............................69
     表4-5-2 以資產市值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-消極投資人...70
     表4-5-3 以資產帳面值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-消極投資人.70
     表4-5-4 資產報酬率迴歸式-消極投資人........................71
     表4-5-5 股東權益報酬率迴歸式-消極投資人.....................71
     表4-5-6 公司價值迴歸式-消極投資人..........................72
     表4-5-7 實證結果彙總表-消極投資人..........................73
     表4-6-1 配對t檢定-單一投資人..............................74
     表4-6-2 以資產市值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-單一投資人...75
     表4-6-3 以資產帳面值平減之營運現金流量報酬率迴歸式-單一投資人.75
     表4-6-4 資產報酬率迴歸式-單一投資人........................76
     表4-6-5 股東權益報酬率迴歸式-單一投資人....................76
     表4-6-6 公司價值迴歸式-單一投資人..........................77
     表4-6-7 實證結果彙總表-單一投資人..........................78
     表4-6-8 各假說研究結果彙總表...............................79
     表4-7-1 拔靴法實證結果....................................81
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096353046en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 私募zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 應募人zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 經營績效zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Private placementen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Private placement investoren_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Performanceen_US
dc.title (題名) 私募應募人種類與經營績效之探討zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂季蓉,2005,台灣上市上櫃公司私募之研究—論私募對象之影響,國立中山大學財務管理學系碩士班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林嘉慧,2007,台灣上市公司私募股權現況與績效之探討,東吳大學商學院企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張文魁,2006,股權結構對私募發行公司價值影響之分析,國立政治大學財務管理學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁晏慈,2007,論私募公司之折價發行、宣告效果及長期績效表現,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許雪芳,2003,上市上櫃公司私募之研究,國立中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陸潤生,2005,私募宣告之資訊內涵,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陸瀛謙,2008,私募折價幅度及私募前後異常報酬,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Allen, J. W., and G. M. Phillips. 2000. Corporate equity ownership, strategic alliances, and product market relationships. The Journal of Finance 55 (December): 2791-2815.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan. 2007. Private placements and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Corporate Finance 13 (September): 461-484.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barclay, M. J., C. G. Holderness, and D. P. Sheehan. 2001. The block pricing puzzle. Working paper, Simon School of Business.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chu, S. M., G. H. Lentz, and E. Robak. 2005. Comparing the characteristics and performance of private equity offering frims with seasoned equity offering firms. Journal of Economics and Management 1 (January): 57-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cronqvist, H., and M. Nilsson. 2005. The choice between rights offerings and private equity placements. Journal of Financial Economics 78 (November): 375-407.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt.1994. A simple approximation of tobin`s q. Financial Management 23 (Autumn): 70-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Demsetz, H., and K. Lehn. 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93 (December): 1155-1177.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gillan, S. L. and L. T. Starks. 2000. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: The role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics 57 (August): 275-305.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hertzel, M. G., M. Lemmon, J. Linck, and L. Rees. 2002. Long-run performance following private placements of equity. Journal of Finance 57 (December): 2595-2617.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hertzel, M. G., and R. L. Smith. 1993. Market discounts and shareholder gains for placing equity privately. Journal of Finance 48 (June): 459-485.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Healy, P. M., K. G. Palepu, and R. S. Ruback. 1992. Does corporate performance improve after merges? Journal of Financial Economics 31 (April): 135-176.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (October): 305-360.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jensen, M. C. and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 5-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krishnamurthy, S., P. Spindt, V. Subramaniam, and T. Woidtke. 2005 Does investor identity matter in equity issues? Evidence from private placements. Journal of Financial Intermediation 14 (April): 210-238.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leland, H., and D. H. Pyle. 1977. Information asymmetric, financial structure and financial intermediation. Journal of Finance 32 (June): 371-388.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lindenberg, E. and S. Ross. 1981. Tobin`s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54 (January): 1-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myers, S. C. and N. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics13 (June): 187-221.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (January-March): 293-315.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94 (June): 461-488.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tobin, J., and W. C. Brainard. 1977. Asset markets and the cost of capital. Economic progress: Private values and public policy, 235-262. Amsterdam, North-Holland.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wruck, K. H., and Y. Wu. 2009. Relationships, corporate governance, and performance: Evidence from private placements of common stock. Journal of Corporate Finance 15 (February):30-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wruck, K. H. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value: Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics 23 (June): 3-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wu, Y. 2004. The choice of equity-selling mechanisms. Journal of Financial Economics 74 (October): 93-119.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wahal, S. 1996. Pension fund activism and firm performance. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31 (March): 1-23.zh_TW