學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 景氣循環與分析師預測偏差程度之關係
none
作者 蔡佳臻
貢獻者 張清福
none
蔡佳臻
關鍵詞 景氣循環
分析師預測
Business Cycle
Analysts` Forecasts
日期 2002
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:34:27 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究探討分析師盈餘預測偏差程度是否受到景氣循環的影響。首先以美國股市大盤指數的漲跌趨勢判定景氣循環的高峰時點,並藉此區分景氣循環由上往下反轉與否之依據。其次,探討當景氣由上往下反轉時,分析師盈餘預測的偏差程度是否有明顯增加的現象。最後,探討預測該公司之分析師人數、公司盈餘變動程度、公司發生損失及分析師盈餘預測的分散程度與分析師盈餘預測偏差程度之相關性,於景氣由上往下反轉時期與景氣穩定成長時期是否會有顯著差異。
     實證結果顯示:(1)分析師盈餘預測偏差程度的確會受到景氣循環的影響。當景氣由上往下反轉時,分析師未能掌握景氣循環的脈動,立即修正其盈餘預測,而是傾向發佈具樂觀性偏差的盈餘預測。(2)處於景氣由上往下反轉時期,預測該公司之分析師人數、公司發生損失及分析師預測盈餘分散程度對分析師盈餘預測的偏差程度之影響會產生強化效果。然而,本研究並無充足證據顯示,公司盈餘變動程度與分析師盈餘預測偏差程度之相關性會受到景氣由上往下反轉而有所不同。
This study investigates whether business cycle affects bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. Based on NASDAQ market index, an economic sudden slump is selected for examining whether the bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts is more obvious during the period of the economic slump. On top of this, the association between the bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts and some economic factors including number of analysts following, change in earnings, firm loss and forecast dispersion in the economic sudden slump is also explored.
     The empirical results show that business cycle in analysts’ earnings forecasts indeed influences bias. When the economic sudden slump happens, analysts are not aware of business cycle’s fluctuation in time to revise their earnings forecasts; instead they trend to issue optimistic bias in earnings forecasts. In the economic sudden slump, the number of analysts following, firm loss and forecast dispersion deeply affect bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. However, this study does not find sufficient evidence that the association between change in earnings and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts is more obvious during the period of economic sudden slump.
參考文獻 一、中文部份
王心瑩,1999,企業經營績效與產業景氣循環之關連:以台灣半導體產業為例,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
王文箴,2000,台灣半導體製造業之景氣循環與經營績效分析,國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
吳心儀,2002,分析師預測誤差與公司特性的關聯性,立元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林玟君,2002,分析師預測誤差與長短期股價的關聯性,私立元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
林靜如,1996,管理當局盈餘預測與財務分析師預測修正之關連性研究,私立文化大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
夏光宇,2002 ,台灣股市報酬波動與景氣循環關係之研究,私立長庚大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
許敏政,2001,盈餘品質對分析師預測及審計意見之影響,彰化師範大學未出版碩士論文。
楊承澔,2002,景氣循環與企業經營績效、盈餘管理關聯性之探討,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
二、英文部份
Amato, L. and R. Wilder. 1990. Firm and industry effects in industrial economics. Southern Economic Journal 57 (July): 93-105
Bamber, L.,O. Barron, and T. Stober. 1997. Trading volume and different aspects of disagreement coincident with earnings announcements. The Accounting Review 72 (October): 575-597
Bhardwaj, R. K. and L. D. Brooks. 1993. Dual betas from bull and bear markets:reversal of the size effect. The Journal of Financial Research 16 (Winter): 269-283
Bhushan, R. 1989. Firm characteristics and analyst following. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (July): 255-274
Brown, L.D., R. Hagerman, P. Griffin, and M. Zmijewski. 1987. Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time-series models in forecasting quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 9 (April): 61-78
-----, G. Richardson, and S. Schwager. 1987. An information interpretation of financial analyst superiority in forecasting earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 25 (Spring): 49-67
-----. 1993. Earnings forecasting research: Its implications for capital market research. International Journal of Forecasting 9 (November): 295-320
-----. 2001. A temporal analysis of earnings surprises: Profits versus losses. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (September): 221-242
Butler, K. C. and L. H. P. Lang. 1991. The forecast accuracy of individual analysts: evidence of systematic optimism and pessimism. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Spring): 150-156
Das, S., C. B. Levine, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 1998. Earnings predictability and bias in analysts` earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 73 (April): 277-294
Duru, A. and D. M. Reeb. 2002. International diversification and analysts` forecast accuracy. The Accounting Review 77 (April): 415-433
Eddy, A. and B. Seifert. 1992. An examination of hypotheses concerning earnings forecast errors. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 31 (Spring): 22-37
Hayes, R. M. and C. B. Levine. 2000. An approach to adjusting analysts` consensus forecasts for selection bias. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (Spring): 61-83
Kang, S., J. O`Brien, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 1994. Analysts` interim earnings forecasts: evidence on the forecasting process. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Spring): 103-112
Kim, M. K. and D. A. Burnie. 2002. The firm size effect and the economic cycle. The Journal of Financial Research 25 (Spring): 111-124
Kross, W., B. T. Ro, and D. Schroeder. 1990. Earnings expectations: The analysts’ information advantage. The Accounting Review 65 (April): 461-476
Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (October): 467-492
Lim, T. 2001. Rationality and analysts’ bias. Journal of Finance 56 (February): 369-385
Matolcsy, Z. P. 2000. Executive cash compensation and corporate performance during different economic cycles. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (Winter): 671-692
Mcnichols, M. and P. C. O`Brien. 1997. Self-selection and analyst coverage. Journal of Accounting Research 35: 167-199
Mitchell, W. C. 1927. Business Cycles: The Problem and Its Setting. New York, National Bureau of Economic Research.
O’Brian, P. C., and R. Bhushan. 1990. Analyst following and institutional ownership. Journal of Accounting Research 28 (Spring): 55-82
Gu, Z., and J. Wu. 2001. Earnings skewness and analysts’ forecast bias. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
90353006
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903530061
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 張清福zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor noneen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蔡佳臻zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 蔡佳臻zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:34:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:34:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:34:27 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0903530061en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30271-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90353006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究探討分析師盈餘預測偏差程度是否受到景氣循環的影響。首先以美國股市大盤指數的漲跌趨勢判定景氣循環的高峰時點,並藉此區分景氣循環由上往下反轉與否之依據。其次,探討當景氣由上往下反轉時,分析師盈餘預測的偏差程度是否有明顯增加的現象。最後,探討預測該公司之分析師人數、公司盈餘變動程度、公司發生損失及分析師盈餘預測的分散程度與分析師盈餘預測偏差程度之相關性,於景氣由上往下反轉時期與景氣穩定成長時期是否會有顯著差異。
     實證結果顯示:(1)分析師盈餘預測偏差程度的確會受到景氣循環的影響。當景氣由上往下反轉時,分析師未能掌握景氣循環的脈動,立即修正其盈餘預測,而是傾向發佈具樂觀性偏差的盈餘預測。(2)處於景氣由上往下反轉時期,預測該公司之分析師人數、公司發生損失及分析師預測盈餘分散程度對分析師盈餘預測的偏差程度之影響會產生強化效果。然而,本研究並無充足證據顯示,公司盈餘變動程度與分析師盈餘預測偏差程度之相關性會受到景氣由上往下反轉而有所不同。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study investigates whether business cycle affects bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. Based on NASDAQ market index, an economic sudden slump is selected for examining whether the bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts is more obvious during the period of the economic slump. On top of this, the association between the bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts and some economic factors including number of analysts following, change in earnings, firm loss and forecast dispersion in the economic sudden slump is also explored.
     The empirical results show that business cycle in analysts’ earnings forecasts indeed influences bias. When the economic sudden slump happens, analysts are not aware of business cycle’s fluctuation in time to revise their earnings forecasts; instead they trend to issue optimistic bias in earnings forecasts. In the economic sudden slump, the number of analysts following, firm loss and forecast dispersion deeply affect bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts. However, this study does not find sufficient evidence that the association between change in earnings and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts is more obvious during the period of economic sudden slump.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目 錄
     第壹章 緒論
     第一節 研究動機與目的 1
     第二節 研究問題 2
     第三節 研究架構 3
     
     第貳章 文獻探討
     第一節 景氣循環基本理論 4
     第二節 文獻回顧 11
     
     第參章 研究方法
     第一節 實證假設 17
     第二節 研究變數 22
     第三節 資料來源與處理 26
     第四節 樣本資料 26
     第五節 統計方法 27
     
     第肆章 實證結果與分析
     第一節 基本敍述統計量 28
     第二節 實證結果分析 30
     第三節 敏感性分析 39
     
     第伍章 結論與建議
     第一節 研究結論 44
     第二節 研究限制 45
     第三節 研究建議 46
     
     參考文獻
     中文部份 47
     英文部份 48
     
     表 目 錄
     表一 各變數之敍述統計量 28
     表二 皮爾森相關係數矩陣 29
     表三 分析師盈餘預測偏差程度是否受到景氣循環影響之迴歸結果-式(1) ─不含交叉相乘項 32
     表四 預期與實際結果彙總比較表 32
     表五 景氣循環影響與分析師盈餘預測的偏差程度之迴歸結果-式(2)
     ─含交叉相乘項 36
     表六 預期與實際結果彙總比較表-式(2) 37
     表七 各變數之VIF值 38
     表八 分析師盈餘預測偏差程度是否受到景氣循環影響之迴歸結果-式(1a)
     ─不含交叉相乘項 40
     表九 景氣循環影響與分析師盈餘預測的偏差程度之迴歸結果-式(2a)
     ─含交叉相乘項 41
     表十 分析師盈餘預測偏差程度是否受到景氣循環影響之迴歸結果-式(1b)
     ─不含交叉相乘項 42
     表十一 景氣循環影響與分析師盈餘預測的偏差程度之迴歸結果-式(2b)
     ─含交叉相乘項 43
     表十二 實證結果彙總表 45
     
     圖 目 錄
     圖1 Mitchell (1951)景氣循環之劃分 6
     圖2 我國經建會景氣循環階段之劃分 7
     圖3 美國國家經濟研究局 (NBER)景氣循環時段之劃分 8
     圖4 大盤指數漲跌趨勢圖 10
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903530061en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 景氣循環zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 分析師預測zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Business Cycleen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Analysts` Forecastsen_US
dc.title (題名) 景氣循環與分析師預測偏差程度之關係zh_TW
dc.title (題名) noneen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王心瑩,1999,企業經營績效與產業景氣循環之關連:以台灣半導體產業為例,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王文箴,2000,台灣半導體製造業之景氣循環與經營績效分析,國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳心儀,2002,分析師預測誤差與公司特性的關聯性,立元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林玟君,2002,分析師預測誤差與長短期股價的關聯性,私立元智大學管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林靜如,1996,管理當局盈餘預測與財務分析師預測修正之關連性研究,私立文化大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 夏光宇,2002 ,台灣股市報酬波動與景氣循環關係之研究,私立長庚大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許敏政,2001,盈餘品質對分析師預測及審計意見之影響,彰化師範大學未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊承澔,2002,景氣循環與企業經營績效、盈餘管理關聯性之探討,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Amato, L. and R. Wilder. 1990. Firm and industry effects in industrial economics. Southern Economic Journal 57 (July): 93-105zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bamber, L.,O. Barron, and T. Stober. 1997. Trading volume and different aspects of disagreement coincident with earnings announcements. The Accounting Review 72 (October): 575-597zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhardwaj, R. K. and L. D. Brooks. 1993. Dual betas from bull and bear markets:reversal of the size effect. The Journal of Financial Research 16 (Winter): 269-283zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhushan, R. 1989. Firm characteristics and analyst following. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (July): 255-274zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, L.D., R. Hagerman, P. Griffin, and M. Zmijewski. 1987. Security analyst superiority relative to univariate time-series models in forecasting quarterly earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics 9 (April): 61-78zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -----, G. Richardson, and S. Schwager. 1987. An information interpretation of financial analyst superiority in forecasting earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 25 (Spring): 49-67zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -----. 1993. Earnings forecasting research: Its implications for capital market research. International Journal of Forecasting 9 (November): 295-320zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -----. 2001. A temporal analysis of earnings surprises: Profits versus losses. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (September): 221-242zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Butler, K. C. and L. H. P. Lang. 1991. The forecast accuracy of individual analysts: evidence of systematic optimism and pessimism. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (Spring): 150-156zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Das, S., C. B. Levine, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 1998. Earnings predictability and bias in analysts` earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 73 (April): 277-294zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duru, A. and D. M. Reeb. 2002. International diversification and analysts` forecast accuracy. The Accounting Review 77 (April): 415-433zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eddy, A. and B. Seifert. 1992. An examination of hypotheses concerning earnings forecast errors. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics 31 (Spring): 22-37zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hayes, R. M. and C. B. Levine. 2000. An approach to adjusting analysts` consensus forecasts for selection bias. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (Spring): 61-83zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kang, S., J. O`Brien, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 1994. Analysts` interim earnings forecasts: evidence on the forecasting process. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Spring): 103-112zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kim, M. K. and D. A. Burnie. 2002. The firm size effect and the economic cycle. The Journal of Financial Research 25 (Spring): 111-124zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kross, W., B. T. Ro, and D. Schroeder. 1990. Earnings expectations: The analysts’ information advantage. The Accounting Review 65 (April): 461-476zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lang, M., and R. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (October): 467-492zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lim, T. 2001. Rationality and analysts’ bias. Journal of Finance 56 (February): 369-385zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Matolcsy, Z. P. 2000. Executive cash compensation and corporate performance during different economic cycles. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (Winter): 671-692zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mcnichols, M. and P. C. O`Brien. 1997. Self-selection and analyst coverage. Journal of Accounting Research 35: 167-199zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mitchell, W. C. 1927. Business Cycles: The Problem and Its Setting. New York, National Bureau of Economic Research.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Brian, P. C., and R. Bhushan. 1990. Analyst following and institutional ownership. Journal of Accounting Research 28 (Spring): 55-82zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gu, Z., and J. Wu. 2001. Earnings skewness and analysts’ forecast bias. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University.zh_TW