dc.contributor.advisor | 王文英 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 洪淑娟 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | 洪淑娟 | zh_TW |
dc.date (日期) | 2004 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 11-Sep-2009 17:36:32 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 11-Sep-2009 17:36:32 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 11-Sep-2009 17:36:32 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0923530101 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30291 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 會計研究所 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 92353010 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 93 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 在知識經濟時代下,知識與能力等無形資產將凌駕於土地、資金等傳統生產要素之上,並成為支持經濟持續發展的主要動力。其中,企業日常營運流程、組織制度、人力資源、管理能力、品牌形象、資訊科技應用能力、研發創新能力及智慧財產權等,統稱為「智慧資本」,是企業知識資源的主要來源與競爭力所在。 但是,企業並非毫無目的的去累積智慧資本,而是應該有一個明確的目標、策略,才能讓企業能夠因應環境,確保其在市場上之地位。除此之外,企業還必須要有一套完善的管理制度來加以管理,讓企業能夠有效率地創造與累積公司所需之策略性智慧資本。 本研究採個案研究法,再輔以問卷分析加以支持。以我國兩資訊企業為研究對象,探討兩資訊企業所重視之策略性智慧資本及其相關管理制度為何,以及有何異同,經整理分析,做出以下結論: 一、兩個案公司有共同重視之策略性智慧資本,共9項次分類及17項細項。 二、所採取之策略不同,兩家個案公司之策略性智慧資本亦有不同之處,因此策略會影響公司所欲創造、累積之策略性智慧資本。 三、採取不同策略之兩個案公司,由於所欲累積之策略性智慧資本各有異同,因此所採取的管理制度有相同處亦有不同處。 四、為累積策略性智慧資本,兩個案公司現行的管理制度雖已臻於完善,但仍有部分可改進之處。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 序論 1 第二章 文獻探討 6 第三章 研究設計 38 第四章 實地訪談與問卷定稿 45 第五章 仁寶電腦個案研究 49 第六章 緯創資通個案研究 76 第七章 兩個案公司之比較研究 107 第八章 結論與建議 118 參考文獻 124 附錄 問卷內容 127 | zh_TW |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0923530101 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 策略 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 智慧資本管理制度 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 策略性智慧資本 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 資訊企業 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Strategy | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Intellectual capital management system | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Strategic intellectual capital | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Information enterprise | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 策略與智慧資本管理制度之個案研究—以我國兩資訊企業為例 | zh_TW |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文文獻 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 天下雜誌,2005,1000大製造業排行榜、製造業最賺錢的50家公司排榜, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 第322期(5月):212-217。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王志仁、周銳行,1999,專訪梭羅教授抓住台灣與世界的第三次革命,數 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 位時代,第2期(8月):68-72。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 台灣智慧資本研究中心,第二期電子報,2005.3.25,TICRC:智慧資本分 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 類與架構圖。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳秀娟,2000,企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究-以我國資訊電 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 子業為例,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳思華,2000,策略九說:策略思考的本質,三版,台北:臉譜出版。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳思華、賴鈺晶、顏妙如等,2000,網際網路智慧資本衡量與發展措施研 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 究,經濟部工業局軟體五年發展計畫。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林鈺傑,2003,智慧資本與經營績效關係性之實證研究,國立政治大學會 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 施振榮,1996,再造宏□,一版,台北:天下文化出版。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪仲瑜,2003,產業與策略對智慧資本之影響—以我國資訊電子業及金融 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 服務業為研究對象,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 洪俊龍,2002,人力資源管理系統、智慧資本與組織之效關聯性之研究, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 國立中正大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 曾栗萱,2003,智慧資本與經營績效關聯性之探討-以我國資訊產業為實 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 證對象,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 會計研究月刊,2005,台灣五十整體EVA排行榜,第230期(1月):34。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 董碧玫,2001,智能資本之衡量-以國內電子產業為例,國立中央大學企 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 業管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 資策會,2001,我國產業智慧資本先導性個案研究,財團法人資訊工業策 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 進會分包學術機構研究計畫期末報告。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 酈怡德,2003,筆記型電腦產業發展近況,台灣工業銀行(IBT)綜合研 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 究所專題研究報告。 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 英文文獻 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Albert, A. A., and F. Dieter. 2003. The intellectual capital | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | web: A systematic linking of intellectual capital and | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | knowledge management. Journal of Intellectual Capital 4(1): | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 34-48. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brooking, A., P. Board, and S. Jones. 1998. The predictive | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | potential of intellectual capital. International Journal of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Technology Management 16:115-125. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Collis, D. J., and C. A. Montgomery. 1998. Creating corporate | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | strategy. Harvard Business Review (May-June): 71-83. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Edvinsson, L., and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual Capital: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Realizing Your Company’s True Value by Finding It’s | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hidden Brainpower. New York:HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goran, R., and R. Johan. 1997. Measuring your company’s | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | intellectual performance. Long Range Planning 30(3): 413- | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 426. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Joia, L. A. 2000. Measuring intangible corporate assets: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Linking business strategy with intellectual capital. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Journal of Intellectual Capital 1: 68-84. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johnson, W. 1999. An integrative taxonomy of intellectual | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | capital: Measuring the stock and flow of intellectual | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | capital component in the firm. Journal of Technology | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Management 18: 562-575. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2001. The Strategy-focused | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | the New Business Environment. Boston: Harvard Business | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | School Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Manfred, B., and K. H. Leitner. 2002. Measuring and reporting | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | intellectual capital: The case of research technology | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | organization. Singapore Management Review 24(3): 7-19. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Masoulas, V. 1998. Organizational requirements definition for | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | intellectual capital management. International Journal of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Technology Management 16(1): 126-143. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Miles, R. E., and C. C. Snow. 1978. Organizational Strategy, | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Structure, and Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Petrash, G. 1996. Dow’s journey to a knowledge value | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | management culture. European Management Journal 14: 365-373. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Porter, M. 1980. Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Roos, J., G.. Roos, N.C. Dragonetti, and L. Edvinsson. 1997. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Intellectual Capital: Navigating in the New Business | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Landscape. New York: New York University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Slater, F. S., E. M. Olson, and V. K. Reddy. 1997. Strategy- | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | based performance measurement. Business Horizons 40 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | (Jul/Aug): 37-44. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stewart, T. A. 1997. Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organizations. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Group, Inc. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sveiby, K.E. 1997. The New Organizational Wealth-Managing and | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Measuring Knowledge-based. New York: Berrett-Koehler | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Publishing Group Inc. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Treacy, M., and F.Wiersema. 1995. How market leaders keep their | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | edge. Fortune 131(Feb): 88-93. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | van Buren, M. E. 1999. A yardstick for knowledge management. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Training & Development 53(5): 71-78. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Yin, R. K. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 2nd | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 網站資料 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 公開資訊觀測站:http://newmops.tse.com.tw/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 仁寶電腦工業股份有限公司網站:http://www.compal.com/index_Ch.htm | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 緯創資通股份有限公司網站:http://www.wistron.com.tw/ | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 北京現代商報,2004.5.12,OEM引領筆記型電腦新潮:http://www.bjbusiness.com.cn/20040512/it1667.htm | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 奇摩股市,2004.12.7,緯創組織變革六個事業群併為三個:http://tw.stock.yahoo.com/xp/20041207/50/807551763.html | zh_TW |