Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 準強制性會計師輪調與盈餘反應係數之關聯性研究
作者 賴盈真
貢獻者 周玲臺
賴盈真
關鍵詞 強制性會計師輪調
會計師事務所所間輪調
審計品質
盈餘反應係數
會計師任期
會計師回任
日期 2007
上傳時間 11-Sep-2009 17:40:40 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究主要探討準強制性會計師輪調機制與客戶公司審計品質(以盈餘反應係數為代理變數)的關聯性,並藉由檢視在此機制下有進行會計師輪調之公司與未進行會計師輪調之公司的盈餘反應係數、會計師輪調後後續年度的盈餘反應係數以及採行所間/所內會計師輪調的盈餘反應係數來檢視準強制性會計師輪調機制對審計品質的潛在影響力,進而瞭解該機制的實施成效。
     本研究發現,雖然迴歸結果顯示有進行會計師輪調樣本之盈餘反應係數大於未進行會計師輪調樣本的盈餘反應係數,投資大眾認為有進行會計師輪調之公司其審計品質優於未進行會計師輪調之公司,與本研究之預期方向相符;但由於結果並未達顯著水準,表示在投資人心中,準強制性會計師輪調機制並未對公司審計品質造成太大的影響。就輪調之後續年度審計品質變化而言,在輪調後第一年及第二年的盈餘反應係數較輪調當年度為低;雖然結果不顯著,卻顯示市場認知的審計品質在會計師輪調後初期有下降的現象,可能是投資人認為繼任會計師在查核初期對受查者事業的不熟悉,將導致審計品質下降所致。
     就事務所間輪調與事務所內輪調之效果而言,本研究的實證結果指出投資人認為在應輪調年度採行會計師所間輪調較所內輪調更能提昇審計品質,但結果亦不顯著。至於在所間輪調下,事務所規模是否會影響審計品質之問題探討,根據所間輪調樣本的營運狀況與財務比率,本研究發現選擇將查核會計師由非四大會計師事務所更換至四大會計師事務所的公司擁有較佳的營運狀況與財務體質,與大眾直覺及預期相符。
This study is mainly discussing the association between quasi-mandatory auditor rotation system in Taiwan and the audit quality (use earnings response coefficient, ERC, as proxy) of company by examining the ERC of companies that do not rotate their audit-partner versus companies that rotate their audit-partner under this system, analyzing the change of ERC in the follow-up years after audit-partner rotation, and comparing the difference of ERC between audit-firm rotation and audit-partner rotation.
     The empirical results indicate that, although insignificant, investors perceive the audit quality of companies which rotate their audit-partner is better than the audit quality of the companies that do not rotate. This means, in investors’ thought, the quasi-mandatory auditor rotation system doesn’t work in audit quality promotion. For the change of the audit quality in the years after audit-partner rotation, this study finds out the audit quality the market perceived will go down in the first and the second year after audit-partner rotation due to the successors’ unfamiliarity with their clients. Furthermore, the result insignificantly points out that the public think audit-firm rotation is more useful in audit quality improving than audit-partner rotation.
     As to the question that whether the scale of audit firm influence audit quality, the evidence from the operation data and financial ratio of audit-firm rotated sample in this study suggests that the companies which rotate their audit-partner from non-Big4 to Big4 have superior operational performance and sounder financial condition than companies rotate their audit-partner in other ways. This result is consistent with the intuition of the public and the expectation of this study.
參考文獻 中文部分
李秀霞,1995,審計品質與盈餘反應係數之研究,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
李宣進,1996,再探審計品質與盈餘反應係數之關連,私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
李建然與林秀鳳,2005,會計師任期與異常應計數之關連性研究,管理評論,第二十四卷第四期(十月):103-126。
李建然與陳振芳,2004,審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理-以五大事務所組別為觀察標的,會計評論第38期(一月):59-80。
余景仁,2001,事務所/會計師更換與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
林嬋娟與林孝倫,2007,會計師輪調制度,會計研究月刊,第258期(五月):88-95。
吳彥宜,2005,我國強制性會計師輪調制度與審計品質之關連性研究,國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。
馬君梅與謝永明,2007,事務所內自發性會計師更換對公司盈餘品質之影響,東吳經濟商學學報,第56期(三月):79-105。
郭子緯,2006,會計師任期與審計品質認知,私立銘傳大學會計學系碩士論文。
戚務君、廖益均、黃惠琦,2004,強制性合夥會計師輪調制度與異常應計金額之關連性研究。
陳育成、莊勝傑,2008,會計師輪調與回任影響審計品質之實證,2008國立雲林科技大學國際會計學術研討會發表論文。
陳義麟,1998,認知的審計品質與盈餘反應係數之實證研究,國立中正大學會計學系碩士論文。
張文瀞,2001,審計品質對上市公司盈餘管理之影響,當代會計,第二卷第二期:195-214。
張俊賢,2003,強制性輪調對審計品質之影響,國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。
黃珮娟,2004,會計師事務所與審計品質之關聯性研究,私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。
楊雅雯,2004,會計師之產業專精及查核年資與盈餘品質之關係-績效調整後裁決性應計金額與應計項目估計誤差之衡量,私立輔仁大學會計學系碩士論文。
蔡美玲,2006,會計師任期與盈餘反應係數之實證性研究國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。
蔡檳全,2005,事務所內會計師輪調與審計品質之研究,私立中國文化大學會計學系碩士論文。
賴春田,2000,會計師的業務、責任及會計師事務所組織的演變,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
蘇裕惠,2005,會計師任期與審計品質,當代會計,第六卷第二期(十一月):187-220。
蘇裕惠與彭日欣,2005,從各國會計師輪調制度看會計師之獨立性與審計品質-國際篇,會計研究月刊,第232期(三月):96-101。
英文部分
AICPA. 1992. Statement of Position Regarding Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms of Publicly Held Companies. New York.
Arrunada, B. and C. Paz-Ares. 1997. Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination. International Review of Law and Economics Vol. 17: 31-61.
Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 22, No. 2: 71-97.
Becker C. L., M. L. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 1-24.
Brody, R. G. and S. A. Moscove. 1998. Mandatory Auditor Rotation. National Public Accountant (May): 32-36.
Carcello, J. V. and A. L. Nagy. 2004. Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 23, No. 2: 55-69.
Carey, P. and R. Simnett. 2006. Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review Vol. 81, No. 3: 653-676.
Casterella, J., W. R. Knechel, and P. L. Walker. 2002. The Relationship of Audit Failures and Auditor Tenure. Working Paper, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Chen, C., C. Lin, and Y. Lin. 2008. Audit Partner Tenure, Audit Firm Tenure, and Discretionary Accruals: Does Long Auditor Tenure Impair Earnings Quality? Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 25, No. 2:415-445.
Chi, W. and H. Hung. 2004. Discretionary Accruals, Audit-Firm Tenure and Auditor Tenure: An Empirical Case in Taiwan. 2004 AAA Annual Midyear Auditing Section Conference (Clearwater, U. S. A.).
_______, H. Hung, Y. Liao, and H. Xie. 2008. Mandatory Audit-Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Working Paper, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chung, H. and S. Kallapur, 2003. Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review Vol. 78, No. 4: 931-955.
Davis, L. R., B. Soo, and G. Trompeter. 2002. Auditor Tenure, Auditor Independence and Earnings Management. Working Paper, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.
DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor Independence, Low-Balling, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol. 3 (August): 113-127.
__________. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol. 3 (December): 183-199.
Dechow, P. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals, Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol. 18: 3-42.
Frankel, R., J. Marilyn and K. Nelson. 2002. The Relations between Auditors’ Fee for Non-Audit Services and Earning Quality. The Accounting Review Vol. 77 (Supplement): 71-105.
Geiger, M. A. and K. Raghunandan. 2002. Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 21, No. 1: 67-78.
Ghosh, A., and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review Vol. 88, No. 2: 585-612.
Gul, F, S. Lynn, and J. Tsui. 2002. Audit Quality, Management Ownership, and the Information of Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance. Vol. 17 No. 1: 25-49.
Hackenbrack, K. E. and C. E. Hogan. 2002. Market response to earnings surprises conditional on reasons for an auditor change. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 19, No. 2: 195-223.
Higgs, J. L. and T. R. Skantz. 2006. Audit and nonaudit fees and the market’s reaction to earnings announcements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 25, No. 1: 1-26.
International Federation Accountants (IFAC). 2003. Rebuilding Public Confidence in Financial Reporting. New York: IFAC.
Johnson V. E., I. K. Khurana, and J. K. Reynolds. 2002. Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 19, No. 4: 637-660.
Knchel, W. R., V. Naiker, and G. Pacheco. 2007. Does auditor industry specialization matter? Evidence from market reaction to auditor switches. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 26, No. 1: 19-45.
Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 22, No. 1: 109-126.
Krishnan, J., H. Sami, and Y. Zhang. 2005. Does the provision of nonaudit services affect investor perceptions of auditor independence? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 24, No. 2: 111-135.
Mansi, S. A., W. F. Maxwell, and D. P. Miller. 2004. Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market. Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 42 (Supplement): 755-793.
Myers, J. N., L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review Vol. 78, No. 3: 779-799.
Palmrose, Z. 1986. Litigation and Independent Auditors: The Role of Business Failures and Management Fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 90-113.
Petty, R. and S. Cuganesan. 1996. Auditor Rotation: Framing the Debate. Australian Accountant (May): 40-41.
Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP. 2002. Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms: Will It Improve Audit Quality? New York, NY: Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP.
Teoh, S. H. and T. J. Wong. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review Vol. 68, No. 2: 346-366.
Tirole, J. 1986. Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization Vol. 2 No. 2: 181-214.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
會計研究所
95353014
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0953530141
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 周玲臺zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 賴盈真zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 賴盈真zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 11-Sep-2009 17:40:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 11-Sep-2009 17:40:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 11-Sep-2009 17:40:40 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0953530141en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30330-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 會計研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95353014zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要探討準強制性會計師輪調機制與客戶公司審計品質(以盈餘反應係數為代理變數)的關聯性,並藉由檢視在此機制下有進行會計師輪調之公司與未進行會計師輪調之公司的盈餘反應係數、會計師輪調後後續年度的盈餘反應係數以及採行所間/所內會計師輪調的盈餘反應係數來檢視準強制性會計師輪調機制對審計品質的潛在影響力,進而瞭解該機制的實施成效。
     本研究發現,雖然迴歸結果顯示有進行會計師輪調樣本之盈餘反應係數大於未進行會計師輪調樣本的盈餘反應係數,投資大眾認為有進行會計師輪調之公司其審計品質優於未進行會計師輪調之公司,與本研究之預期方向相符;但由於結果並未達顯著水準,表示在投資人心中,準強制性會計師輪調機制並未對公司審計品質造成太大的影響。就輪調之後續年度審計品質變化而言,在輪調後第一年及第二年的盈餘反應係數較輪調當年度為低;雖然結果不顯著,卻顯示市場認知的審計品質在會計師輪調後初期有下降的現象,可能是投資人認為繼任會計師在查核初期對受查者事業的不熟悉,將導致審計品質下降所致。
     就事務所間輪調與事務所內輪調之效果而言,本研究的實證結果指出投資人認為在應輪調年度採行會計師所間輪調較所內輪調更能提昇審計品質,但結果亦不顯著。至於在所間輪調下,事務所規模是否會影響審計品質之問題探討,根據所間輪調樣本的營運狀況與財務比率,本研究發現選擇將查核會計師由非四大會計師事務所更換至四大會計師事務所的公司擁有較佳的營運狀況與財務體質,與大眾直覺及預期相符。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study is mainly discussing the association between quasi-mandatory auditor rotation system in Taiwan and the audit quality (use earnings response coefficient, ERC, as proxy) of company by examining the ERC of companies that do not rotate their audit-partner versus companies that rotate their audit-partner under this system, analyzing the change of ERC in the follow-up years after audit-partner rotation, and comparing the difference of ERC between audit-firm rotation and audit-partner rotation.
     The empirical results indicate that, although insignificant, investors perceive the audit quality of companies which rotate their audit-partner is better than the audit quality of the companies that do not rotate. This means, in investors’ thought, the quasi-mandatory auditor rotation system doesn’t work in audit quality promotion. For the change of the audit quality in the years after audit-partner rotation, this study finds out the audit quality the market perceived will go down in the first and the second year after audit-partner rotation due to the successors’ unfamiliarity with their clients. Furthermore, the result insignificantly points out that the public think audit-firm rotation is more useful in audit quality improving than audit-partner rotation.
     As to the question that whether the scale of audit firm influence audit quality, the evidence from the operation data and financial ratio of audit-firm rotated sample in this study suggests that the companies which rotate their audit-partner from non-Big4 to Big4 have superior operational performance and sounder financial condition than companies rotate their audit-partner in other ways. This result is consistent with the intuition of the public and the expectation of this study.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………2
     第一節 研究動機與目的………………………………………………………2
     第二節 研究問題………………………………………………………………7
     第三節 研究貢獻………………………………………………………………8
     第四節 論文架構………………………………………………………………10
     第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………………12
     第一節 審計品質之衡量………………………………………………………12
     第二節 會計師任期與審計品質之理論關係…………………………………17
     第三節 會計師輪調與審計品質………………………………………………21
     第三章 研究方法………………………………………………………………26
     第一節 假說建立………………………………………………………………26
     第二節 模型架構………………………………………………………………29
     第三節 變數衡量………………………………………………………………31
     第四節 樣本選取………………………………………………………………35
     第五節 會計師回任……………………………………………………………41
     第四章 實證結果分析…………………………………………………………43
     第一節 敘述性統計……………………………………………………………44
     第二節 迴歸分析與結果………………………………………………………53
     第三節 敏感性分析……………………………………………………………63
     第五章 結論與建議……………………………………………………………66
     第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………………66
     第二節 研究限制與後續研究之建議…………………………………………68
     參考文獻………………………………………………………………………69
     中文部分………………………………………………………………………69
     英文部分………………………………………………………………………70
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0953530141en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 強制性會計師輪調zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 會計師事務所所間輪調zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 審計品質zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 盈餘反應係數zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 會計師任期zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 會計師回任zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 準強制性會計師輪調與盈餘反應係數之關聯性研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李秀霞,1995,審計品質與盈餘反應係數之研究,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李宣進,1996,再探審計品質與盈餘反應係數之關連,私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李建然與林秀鳳,2005,會計師任期與異常應計數之關連性研究,管理評論,第二十四卷第四期(十月):103-126。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李建然與陳振芳,2004,審計客戶重要性與盈餘管理-以五大事務所組別為觀察標的,會計評論第38期(一月):59-80。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 余景仁,2001,事務所/會計師更換與盈餘管理關聯性之研究,私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林嬋娟與林孝倫,2007,會計師輪調制度,會計研究月刊,第258期(五月):88-95。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳彥宜,2005,我國強制性會計師輪調制度與審計品質之關連性研究,國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬君梅與謝永明,2007,事務所內自發性會計師更換對公司盈餘品質之影響,東吳經濟商學學報,第56期(三月):79-105。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭子緯,2006,會計師任期與審計品質認知,私立銘傳大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 戚務君、廖益均、黃惠琦,2004,強制性合夥會計師輪調制度與異常應計金額之關連性研究。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳育成、莊勝傑,2008,會計師輪調與回任影響審計品質之實證,2008國立雲林科技大學國際會計學術研討會發表論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳義麟,1998,認知的審計品質與盈餘反應係數之實證研究,國立中正大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張文瀞,2001,審計品質對上市公司盈餘管理之影響,當代會計,第二卷第二期:195-214。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張俊賢,2003,強制性輪調對審計品質之影響,國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃珮娟,2004,會計師事務所與審計品質之關聯性研究,私立東吳大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊雅雯,2004,會計師之產業專精及查核年資與盈餘品質之關係-績效調整後裁決性應計金額與應計項目估計誤差之衡量,私立輔仁大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡美玲,2006,會計師任期與盈餘反應係數之實證性研究國立台北大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡檳全,2005,事務所內會計師輪調與審計品質之研究,私立中國文化大學會計學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴春田,2000,會計師的業務、責任及會計師事務所組織的演變,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇裕惠,2005,會計師任期與審計品質,當代會計,第六卷第二期(十一月):187-220。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇裕惠與彭日欣,2005,從各國會計師輪調制度看會計師之獨立性與審計品質-國際篇,會計研究月刊,第232期(三月):96-101。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) AICPA. 1992. Statement of Position Regarding Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms of Publicly Held Companies. New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arrunada, B. and C. Paz-Ares. 1997. Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination. International Review of Law and Economics Vol. 17: 31-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Balsam, S., J. Krishnan, and J. S. Yang. 2003. Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 22, No. 2: 71-97.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Becker C. L., M. L. Defond, J. Jiambalvo, and K. R. Subramanyam. 1998. The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research (Spring): 1-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brody, R. G. and S. A. Moscove. 1998. Mandatory Auditor Rotation. National Public Accountant (May): 32-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carcello, J. V. and A. L. Nagy. 2004. Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 23, No. 2: 55-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carey, P. and R. Simnett. 2006. Audit partner tenure and audit quality. The Accounting Review Vol. 81, No. 3: 653-676.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Casterella, J., W. R. Knechel, and P. L. Walker. 2002. The Relationship of Audit Failures and Auditor Tenure. Working Paper, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, C., C. Lin, and Y. Lin. 2008. Audit Partner Tenure, Audit Firm Tenure, and Discretionary Accruals: Does Long Auditor Tenure Impair Earnings Quality? Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 25, No. 2:415-445.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chi, W. and H. Hung. 2004. Discretionary Accruals, Audit-Firm Tenure and Auditor Tenure: An Empirical Case in Taiwan. 2004 AAA Annual Midyear Auditing Section Conference (Clearwater, U. S. A.).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) _______, H. Hung, Y. Liao, and H. Xie. 2008. Mandatory Audit-Partner Rotation, Audit Quality, and Market Perception: Evidence from Taiwan. Working Paper, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chung, H. and S. Kallapur, 2003. Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review Vol. 78, No. 4: 931-955.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Davis, L. R., B. Soo, and G. Trompeter. 2002. Auditor Tenure, Auditor Independence and Earnings Management. Working Paper, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo, L. 1981. Auditor Independence, Low-Balling, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol. 3 (August): 113-127.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) __________. 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol. 3 (December): 183-199.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dechow, P. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals, Journal of Accounting and Economics Vol. 18: 3-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Frankel, R., J. Marilyn and K. Nelson. 2002. The Relations between Auditors’ Fee for Non-Audit Services and Earning Quality. The Accounting Review Vol. 77 (Supplement): 71-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Geiger, M. A. and K. Raghunandan. 2002. Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 21, No. 1: 67-78.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ghosh, A., and D. Moon. 2005. Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. The Accounting Review Vol. 88, No. 2: 585-612.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gul, F, S. Lynn, and J. Tsui. 2002. Audit Quality, Management Ownership, and the Information of Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance. Vol. 17 No. 1: 25-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hackenbrack, K. E. and C. E. Hogan. 2002. Market response to earnings surprises conditional on reasons for an auditor change. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 19, No. 2: 195-223.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Higgs, J. L. and T. R. Skantz. 2006. Audit and nonaudit fees and the market’s reaction to earnings announcements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 25, No. 1: 1-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) International Federation Accountants (IFAC). 2003. Rebuilding Public Confidence in Financial Reporting. New York: IFAC.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson V. E., I. K. Khurana, and J. K. Reynolds. 2002. Audit-firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemporary Accounting Research Vol. 19, No. 4: 637-660.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Knchel, W. R., V. Naiker, and G. Pacheco. 2007. Does auditor industry specialization matter? Evidence from market reaction to auditor switches. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 26, No. 1: 19-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Audit quality and the pricing of discretionary accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 22, No. 1: 109-126.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krishnan, J., H. Sami, and Y. Zhang. 2005. Does the provision of nonaudit services affect investor perceptions of auditor independence? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol. 24, No. 2: 111-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mansi, S. A., W. F. Maxwell, and D. P. Miller. 2004. Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market. Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 42 (Supplement): 755-793.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myers, J. N., L. A. Myers, and T. C. Omer. 2003. Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation? The Accounting Review Vol. 78, No. 3: 779-799.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Palmrose, Z. 1986. Litigation and Independent Auditors: The Role of Business Failures and Management Fraud. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory (Fall): 90-113.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Petty, R. and S. Cuganesan. 1996. Auditor Rotation: Framing the Debate. Australian Accountant (May): 40-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP. 2002. Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms: Will It Improve Audit Quality? New York, NY: Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teoh, S. H. and T. J. Wong. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earnings response coefficient. The Accounting Review Vol. 68, No. 2: 346-366.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tirole, J. 1986. Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization Vol. 2 No. 2: 181-214.zh_TW