Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 審計作業流程建置方法論之研究
作者 林素雯
貢獻者 林宛瑩<br>蔡瑞煌
林素雯
關鍵詞 審計作業
流程改善
知識產業
日期 2007
上傳時間 12-Sep-2009 12:53:26 (UTC+8)
摘要 財務報表查核簽證審計業務具有服務無法規格化、標準化與高度應用專業判斷等知識服務產業特性。基於這些特性,本研究納入品質成本管理觀念,並參考Tsaih and Lin (2006)提出之整體企業流程資訊有機體模式,另行提出審計作業流程建置方法論。透過該方法論建置之審計作業流程主要係將審計流程中需要仰賴專業判斷、具關鍵性之知識服務提供作業點予以辨認出,並於該作業點發展客製化且具修正彈性之指引表,協助審計人員於執行知識服務提供活動時使用,以確認審計品質。基於品質成本管理觀點,納入預防性控制性質的指引表之審計作業流程,預期將較目前以複核程序為主之事後偵測性控制活動及事後更正性活動的審計作業流程更具效率與效能。
Characterized with features of the knowledge-based service industry, the financial audit process performed by the accounting firm is difficult to be standardized and required exercise of high degree of professional judgment. Under these characteristics, and with an application to concepts of quality cost and the Process-Wide Information Organism (Tsaih and Lin 2006) approach, this study proposes an Auditing Business Process Set-up Methodology (ABSM) to analyze the financial audit process. Based on the ABSM, key activities that required exercise of professional judgments in the audit process are first identified. Highly tailored guidance tables corresponding to the activities identified are then developed to provide guidance to auditors in order to assure the quality of audit. The provision of guidance tables is in nature a preventive measure, while the common practices of reviewing process which requires giving and clearing review notes are detective and corrective measures. In the context of quality cost management, a preventive approach is more efficient and effective.
目 錄              頁次
     第一章:緒論         1
     第一節 研究動機          1
     第二節 研究主題與目的       4
     第三節 論文章節架構        5
     
     第二章:文獻探討          6
     第一節 專業服務之特性       6
     第二節 審計品質之探討       11
     第三節 企業流程分析        15
     
     第三章:審計作業流程建置方法論研究 18
     第一節 基本定義(名詞定義)     18
     第二節 審計作業流程建置方法論   22
     
     第四章:個案研究與分析       25
     第一節 個案事務所背景及營運分析  25
     第二節 個案事務所財務報表審計查核作業理論之介紹33
     第三節 以審計作業流程建置方法論模擬建置個案事務所財務簽證審計作業流程36
     
     第五章 結論及建議         54
     第一節 研究結論          54
     第二節 管理意涵 61
     第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議   62
     
     參考文獻              64
參考文獻 中文部份:
林安珮,「會計師事務所審計專業服務品質認知之再研究」,政治大學會計系研究所未出版碩士論文,民國八十六年六月。
袁慧珠,2007,PWIO流程分析模式與ABC成本制度之結合應用 – 以某製造業為例,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
許士軍,1990,管理學,台灣東華書局出版。
陳麗如,2007,審計品質與異常審計公費關聯性之實證研究,臺灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
張文瀞,1992,我國上市公司審計品質替代衡量之研究,政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
張謙恆,2005,會計師事務所合併與審計品質之關係-以致遠、榮聰會計師事務所合併為例,元智大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
張送來,2007,流程成本與流程績效之探討-以某製造業為例,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
黃淑滿,2005,企業流程資訊有機體模式在診斷企業流程之應用及其績效評估–以某公司為例,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。
楊錦州,2002,服務業品質管理,品質學會出版。
英文部份:
Aldhizer, G. R. III, Miller, J. R., Moraglio, J. F. 1995. Common attributes of quality audit. Journal of Accountancy 179 (1): 61-67.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981a. Auditor Independence, Low Balling, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (2): 113-127.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981b. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183-199.
Dye, R. A. 1993. Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. The Journal of Political Economy 101 (5): 88-915.
Dye, R. A. 1995. Incorporation and the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19 (1): 75-115.
Feigenbaum, A. 1961. Total Quality Control: Engineering and Management, 2nd ed. New. York: McGraw-Hill.
Francis, J. R. and Wilson, E. R. 1988. Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review 63 (4): 63-82.
Foster, S. T. 2001. Managing Quality: an integrative approach, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Healy, P. and Lys, t. 1986. Auditor changes following big eight mergers with non-big eight audit firms. Journal of accounting and public policy 5 (4):251-265.
Kotler, P. and Bloom, P. N. 1984. Marketing Professional Services, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Narayanan, V. G. 1994. An analysis of auditor liability rules. Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 32: 39-60.
Palmrose, Z. 1988. An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review 63 (1): 55-73.
Raghunathan, B., Lewis, B.L., and Evans, J.H. 1987. An operational model of auditor independence. Working paper (October), University of Pittsburgh.
Schmenner, R. W. 1995. Service Operations Management, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Simunic, D. A. and Stein, M. T. 1987. Product differentiation in auditing: auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issued. The Canadian Certified General Accountants’ Research Foundation.
Sutton, S. G. 1993. Toward an understanding of the factors affecting the quality for audit engagements. Decision Science: 88-105.
Sutton, S. G. and Lampe, J. 1991. A framework for evaluation process quality for audit engagements. Accounting and Business Research 21 (83): 275-288.
Teoh, S.H. and Wong, T. J. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earning responses coefficient. The Accounting Review (April):346-366
Tsaih, R., and Lin, W. 2006. The process-wide information organism approach for the business process analysis. Industrial Management and Data Systems 106 (4): 509-522
Willingham, J. J. and Jacobson, P. D. 1985. A research response to the Dingell hearings. The Auditor’s Rpeort (Fall):1-4
Wooten, T. C. 2003.Research about auditing quality. The CPA Journal (January): 48-51。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)
92932309
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929323092
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林宛瑩<br>蔡瑞煌zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 林素雯zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 林素雯zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 12-Sep-2009 12:53:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 12-Sep-2009 12:53:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 12-Sep-2009 12:53:26 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0929323092en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30795-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 經營管理碩士學程(EMBA)zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92932309zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 財務報表查核簽證審計業務具有服務無法規格化、標準化與高度應用專業判斷等知識服務產業特性。基於這些特性,本研究納入品質成本管理觀念,並參考Tsaih and Lin (2006)提出之整體企業流程資訊有機體模式,另行提出審計作業流程建置方法論。透過該方法論建置之審計作業流程主要係將審計流程中需要仰賴專業判斷、具關鍵性之知識服務提供作業點予以辨認出,並於該作業點發展客製化且具修正彈性之指引表,協助審計人員於執行知識服務提供活動時使用,以確認審計品質。基於品質成本管理觀點,納入預防性控制性質的指引表之審計作業流程,預期將較目前以複核程序為主之事後偵測性控制活動及事後更正性活動的審計作業流程更具效率與效能。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Characterized with features of the knowledge-based service industry, the financial audit process performed by the accounting firm is difficult to be standardized and required exercise of high degree of professional judgment. Under these characteristics, and with an application to concepts of quality cost and the Process-Wide Information Organism (Tsaih and Lin 2006) approach, this study proposes an Auditing Business Process Set-up Methodology (ABSM) to analyze the financial audit process. Based on the ABSM, key activities that required exercise of professional judgments in the audit process are first identified. Highly tailored guidance tables corresponding to the activities identified are then developed to provide guidance to auditors in order to assure the quality of audit. The provision of guidance tables is in nature a preventive measure, while the common practices of reviewing process which requires giving and clearing review notes are detective and corrective measures. In the context of quality cost management, a preventive approach is more efficient and effective.en_US
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 目 錄              頁次
     第一章:緒論         1
     第一節 研究動機          1
     第二節 研究主題與目的       4
     第三節 論文章節架構        5
     
     第二章:文獻探討          6
     第一節 專業服務之特性       6
     第二節 審計品質之探討       11
     第三節 企業流程分析        15
     
     第三章:審計作業流程建置方法論研究 18
     第一節 基本定義(名詞定義)     18
     第二節 審計作業流程建置方法論   22
     
     第四章:個案研究與分析       25
     第一節 個案事務所背景及營運分析  25
     第二節 個案事務所財務報表審計查核作業理論之介紹33
     第三節 以審計作業流程建置方法論模擬建置個案事務所財務簽證審計作業流程36
     
     第五章 結論及建議         54
     第一節 研究結論          54
     第二節 管理意涵 61
     第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議   62
     
     參考文獻              64
-
dc.description.tableofcontents 目 錄              頁次
     第一章:緒論         1
     第一節 研究動機          1
     第二節 研究主題與目的       4
     第三節 論文章節架構        5
     
     第二章:文獻探討          6
     第一節 專業服務之特性       6
     第二節 審計品質之探討       11
     第三節 企業流程分析        15
     
     第三章:審計作業流程建置方法論研究 18
     第一節 基本定義(名詞定義)     18
     第二節 審計作業流程建置方法論   22
     
     第四章:個案研究與分析       25
     第一節 個案事務所背景及營運分析  25
     第二節 個案事務所財務報表審計查核作業理論之介紹33
     第三節 以審計作業流程建置方法論模擬建置個案事務所財務簽證審計作業流程36
     
     第五章 結論及建議         54
     第一節 研究結論          54
     第二節 管理意涵 61
     第三節 研究限制及後續研究建議   62
     
     參考文獻              64
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0929323092en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 審計作業zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 流程改善zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識產業zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 審計作業流程建置方法論之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部份:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林安珮,「會計師事務所審計專業服務品質認知之再研究」,政治大學會計系研究所未出版碩士論文,民國八十六年六月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 袁慧珠,2007,PWIO流程分析模式與ABC成本制度之結合應用 – 以某製造業為例,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許士軍,1990,管理學,台灣東華書局出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳麗如,2007,審計品質與異常審計公費關聯性之實證研究,臺灣大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張文瀞,1992,我國上市公司審計品質替代衡量之研究,政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張謙恆,2005,會計師事務所合併與審計品質之關係-以致遠、榮聰會計師事務所合併為例,元智大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張送來,2007,流程成本與流程績效之探討-以某製造業為例,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃淑滿,2005,企業流程資訊有機體模式在診斷企業流程之應用及其績效評估–以某公司為例,國立政治大學經營管理碩士學程碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊錦州,2002,服務業品質管理,品質學會出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部份:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aldhizer, G. R. III, Miller, J. R., Moraglio, J. F. 1995. Common attributes of quality audit. Journal of Accountancy 179 (1): 61-67.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo, L. E. 1981a. Auditor Independence, Low Balling, and Disclosure Regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (2): 113-127.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DeAngelo, L. E. 1981b. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (3): 183-199.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dye, R. A. 1993. Auditing standards, legal liability, and auditor wealth. The Journal of Political Economy 101 (5): 88-915.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dye, R. A. 1995. Incorporation and the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19 (1): 75-115.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Feigenbaum, A. 1961. Total Quality Control: Engineering and Management, 2nd ed. New. York: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Francis, J. R. and Wilson, E. R. 1988. Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review 63 (4): 63-82.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foster, S. T. 2001. Managing Quality: an integrative approach, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Healy, P. and Lys, t. 1986. Auditor changes following big eight mergers with non-big eight audit firms. Journal of accounting and public policy 5 (4):251-265.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kotler, P. and Bloom, P. N. 1984. Marketing Professional Services, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Narayanan, V. G. 1994. An analysis of auditor liability rules. Journal of Accounting Research Vol. 32: 39-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Palmrose, Z. 1988. An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review 63 (1): 55-73.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Raghunathan, B., Lewis, B.L., and Evans, J.H. 1987. An operational model of auditor independence. Working paper (October), University of Pittsburgh.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schmenner, R. W. 1995. Service Operations Management, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Simunic, D. A. and Stein, M. T. 1987. Product differentiation in auditing: auditor choice in the market for unseasoned new issued. The Canadian Certified General Accountants’ Research Foundation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sutton, S. G. 1993. Toward an understanding of the factors affecting the quality for audit engagements. Decision Science: 88-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sutton, S. G. and Lampe, J. 1991. A framework for evaluation process quality for audit engagements. Accounting and Business Research 21 (83): 275-288.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teoh, S.H. and Wong, T. J. 1993. Perceived auditor quality and the earning responses coefficient. The Accounting Review (April):346-366zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsaih, R., and Lin, W. 2006. The process-wide information organism approach for the business process analysis. Industrial Management and Data Systems 106 (4): 509-522zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Willingham, J. J. and Jacobson, P. D. 1985. A research response to the Dingell hearings. The Auditor’s Rpeort (Fall):1-4zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wooten, T. C. 2003.Research about auditing quality. The CPA Journal (January): 48-51。zh_TW