學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 強制集保結束期間之股價行為探討
作者 許宗敬
貢獻者 徐燕山
許宗敬
關鍵詞 強制集保
閉鎖期
日期 2002
上傳時間 2009-09-14
摘要 摘 要
     
     台灣之集保法規分別在87年(針對上市公司)以及86年(針對上櫃公司)有一較重大的修訂,此修訂之後凡初次上市、櫃公司之內部人(指董監事及持股百分之十以上之大股東),扣除提出公開申購部分外之所有持股數都需集保。因此本研究之主要目的即在探討於此集保新規定之下,當集保期限結束時,內部人可領回原有集保的股票時,預期股票的供給增加,其對股價影響的效果為何?
     考量國內外於集保規定實務面上的差異,本研究將事件窗口分為二個觀察期,一為集保結束前、後各一天;另一為集保期限結束後七天至後九天。
     
     本研究實證結果如下:
     
     1. 事件窗口一之實證結果在異常報酬方面,上市樣本三天之累積異常報酬為0.78﹪;上櫃樣本三天之累積異常報酬為-0.49﹪,但上市與上櫃樣本之每日異常報酬均不顯著。而在交易量方面,上市樣本三天平均異常交易量增加42%,且在集保結束日及其後一日有顯著異常交易量;上櫃樣本三天平均異常交易量則增加12.3%,但每日異常交易量均不顯著。由於每日之異常報酬均不顯著,且上市與上櫃之實證結果並不一致,因此並無法判斷集保期限對於投資者而言是否具有資訊內涵。
     2. 事件窗口二之實證結果在異常報酬方面,上市樣本在第七天有顯著負異常報酬,且三天之累積異常報酬達-0.88﹪;上櫃樣本在第九天有顯著負異常報酬,三天之累積異常報酬為-0.67﹪。在交易量方面,上市樣本三天平均異常交易量增加82﹪,上櫃樣本則增加36.3﹪,且上市與上櫃每日均有顯著之異常交易量。此結果說明台灣市場在集保期限結束時期之股價行為也有類似美國的閉鎖效果,且由交易量顯著增加可發現在集保期間結束時,內部人的確會出售手中持股。
     3. 影響集保期限結束時負異常報酬的大小之實證結果裡發現,在上市部分,交易量以及內部人持股比例與累積異常報酬間有顯著的負向關係;而在上櫃部分,公司IPO後之股價表現、交易量以及內部人持股比例這三個變數則顯著為負;至於創投及競價拍賣兩變數則在上市與上櫃的實證結果裡皆不顯著。
參考文獻 參考文獻
一、中文參考文獻:
沈中華、李建然 2000,「事件研究法」,台北:華泰文化事業公司。
二、英文參考文獻:
Aggarwal, Rajesh K., Laurie Krigman and Kent L. Womack, 2002, “Strategic IPO Underpricing, Information Momentum, and Lockup Expiration Selling,” Unpublished Manuscript, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College.
Bradley, Daniel J., Bradford D. Jordan, and Ha-Chin Yi 2001, “Venture Capital and IPO Lockup Expiration: An Empirical Analysis,” The Journal of Financial Research, 24, 465-492.
Brau, James C., Val E. Lambson and Grant McQueen 2001, “Why Lockups?” Unpublished Manuscript, Brigham Young University.
Brav, Alon and Paul A. Gompers, 2000, “Insider Trading Subsequent to Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from Expirations of Lock-Up Provisions,” Unpublished Manuscript, Duke University & Harvard University.
Fama, E. F. 1970, “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work,” Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417.
Field, Laura Casares and Gordon Hanka 2001, “The Expiration of IPO Share Lockups,” Journal of Finance, 56, 471-499.
Holthausen, R., R. Leftwich and D. Mayers, 1990, “Large-Block Transactions: The Speed of Response, and Temporary and Permanent Stock-Price Effects,” Journal of Finance, 26, 71-95.
Keasler, Terry R. 2000, “Underwriter Lock-up Duration and the Effect on Shareholder Value,” The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 36, 133-143.
Keim, D. and A. Madhavan, 1996, “The Upstairs Market for Large Block Transcations: Analysis and Measurement of Price Effects,” Review of Financial Studies, 9, 1-36.
Lease, R., R. Masulis and J. Page, 1991, “An Investigation of Market Microstructure Impacts on Event Study Returns,” Journal of Finance, 46, 1523-1536.
Leland, H. and D. Pyle, 1977, “Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation,” Journal of Finance, 32, 371-387.
Mikkelson, W. and M. Partch, 1985, “Stock Price Effects and Costs of Secondary Distributions,” Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 165-194.
Mohan, Nancy J. and Carl R. Chen 2001, “Information Content of Lock-Up Provisions in Initial Public Offerings,” International Review of Economics and Finance, 10, 41-59.
Ofek, Eli and Matthew Richardson 2000, “The IPO Lock-Up Period:Implications for Market Efficiency And Downward Sloping Demand Curves,” Unpublished Manuscript, Stern School of Business, New York University.
Scholes, Myron S. 1972, “The Market for Securities: Substitution versus Price Pressure and the Effects of Information on Share Prices,” Journal of Business, 45, 179-211.
Shleifer, Andrei, 1986, “Do Demand Curves for Stock Slope Down?” Journal of Finance, 41, 579-590.
Welch, I., 1989, “Seasoned Offerings, Imitation Costs, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings,” Journal of Finance, 44, 421-450.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理研究所
89357009
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089357009
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 徐燕山zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 許宗敬zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 許宗敬zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-14-
dc.date.available 2009-09-14-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2009-09-14-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0089357009en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30957-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財務管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 89357009zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 摘 要
     
     台灣之集保法規分別在87年(針對上市公司)以及86年(針對上櫃公司)有一較重大的修訂,此修訂之後凡初次上市、櫃公司之內部人(指董監事及持股百分之十以上之大股東),扣除提出公開申購部分外之所有持股數都需集保。因此本研究之主要目的即在探討於此集保新規定之下,當集保期限結束時,內部人可領回原有集保的股票時,預期股票的供給增加,其對股價影響的效果為何?
     考量國內外於集保規定實務面上的差異,本研究將事件窗口分為二個觀察期,一為集保結束前、後各一天;另一為集保期限結束後七天至後九天。
     
     本研究實證結果如下:
     
     1. 事件窗口一之實證結果在異常報酬方面,上市樣本三天之累積異常報酬為0.78﹪;上櫃樣本三天之累積異常報酬為-0.49﹪,但上市與上櫃樣本之每日異常報酬均不顯著。而在交易量方面,上市樣本三天平均異常交易量增加42%,且在集保結束日及其後一日有顯著異常交易量;上櫃樣本三天平均異常交易量則增加12.3%,但每日異常交易量均不顯著。由於每日之異常報酬均不顯著,且上市與上櫃之實證結果並不一致,因此並無法判斷集保期限對於投資者而言是否具有資訊內涵。
     2. 事件窗口二之實證結果在異常報酬方面,上市樣本在第七天有顯著負異常報酬,且三天之累積異常報酬達-0.88﹪;上櫃樣本在第九天有顯著負異常報酬,三天之累積異常報酬為-0.67﹪。在交易量方面,上市樣本三天平均異常交易量增加82﹪,上櫃樣本則增加36.3﹪,且上市與上櫃每日均有顯著之異常交易量。此結果說明台灣市場在集保期限結束時期之股價行為也有類似美國的閉鎖效果,且由交易量顯著增加可發現在集保期間結束時,內部人的確會出售手中持股。
     3. 影響集保期限結束時負異常報酬的大小之實證結果裡發現,在上市部分,交易量以及內部人持股比例與累積異常報酬間有顯著的負向關係;而在上櫃部分,公司IPO後之股價表現、交易量以及內部人持股比例這三個變數則顯著為負;至於創投及競價拍賣兩變數則在上市與上櫃的實證結果裡皆不顯著。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 目 次
     第一章、 緒論 1
      第一節、 研究背景、動機與目的 1
      第二節、 研究流程與架構 4
     第二章、 文獻探討 6
      第一節、台灣與美國相關集保規定之介紹與差異 6
      第二節、國外閉鎖期效果之實證研究 10
      第三節、效率市場與負斜率需求曲線假說 21
     第三章、 研究設計 24
      第一節、研究主題名詞定義 24
      第二節、樣本選取 26
      第三節、實證方法 28
     第四章、 實證結果 36
      第一節、集保期限結束時之股價行為 37
      第二節、異常報酬影響因素 47
     第五章、 結論與建議 56
      第一節、 研究結論 56
      第二節、 後續研究建議 59
     參考文獻 60
     附錄一、臺灣證券交易所有價證券上市審查準則第十條 63
     附錄二、財團法人櫃買中心有價證券審查準則第三條第一項第四款 66
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089357009en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 強制集保zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 閉鎖期zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 強制集保結束期間之股價行為探討zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文參考文獻:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沈中華、李建然 2000,「事件研究法」,台北:華泰文化事業公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文參考文獻:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aggarwal, Rajesh K., Laurie Krigman and Kent L. Womack, 2002, “Strategic IPO Underpricing, Information Momentum, and Lockup Expiration Selling,” Unpublished Manuscript, Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bradley, Daniel J., Bradford D. Jordan, and Ha-Chin Yi 2001, “Venture Capital and IPO Lockup Expiration: An Empirical Analysis,” The Journal of Financial Research, 24, 465-492.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brau, James C., Val E. Lambson and Grant McQueen 2001, “Why Lockups?” Unpublished Manuscript, Brigham Young University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brav, Alon and Paul A. Gompers, 2000, “Insider Trading Subsequent to Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from Expirations of Lock-Up Provisions,” Unpublished Manuscript, Duke University & Harvard University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fama, E. F. 1970, “Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work,” Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Field, Laura Casares and Gordon Hanka 2001, “The Expiration of IPO Share Lockups,” Journal of Finance, 56, 471-499.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holthausen, R., R. Leftwich and D. Mayers, 1990, “Large-Block Transactions: The Speed of Response, and Temporary and Permanent Stock-Price Effects,” Journal of Finance, 26, 71-95.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keasler, Terry R. 2000, “Underwriter Lock-up Duration and the Effect on Shareholder Value,” The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 36, 133-143.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keim, D. and A. Madhavan, 1996, “The Upstairs Market for Large Block Transcations: Analysis and Measurement of Price Effects,” Review of Financial Studies, 9, 1-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lease, R., R. Masulis and J. Page, 1991, “An Investigation of Market Microstructure Impacts on Event Study Returns,” Journal of Finance, 46, 1523-1536.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leland, H. and D. Pyle, 1977, “Information Asymmetries, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation,” Journal of Finance, 32, 371-387.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mikkelson, W. and M. Partch, 1985, “Stock Price Effects and Costs of Secondary Distributions,” Journal of Financial Economics, 14, 165-194.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mohan, Nancy J. and Carl R. Chen 2001, “Information Content of Lock-Up Provisions in Initial Public Offerings,” International Review of Economics and Finance, 10, 41-59.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ofek, Eli and Matthew Richardson 2000, “The IPO Lock-Up Period:Implications for Market Efficiency And Downward Sloping Demand Curves,” Unpublished Manuscript, Stern School of Business, New York University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scholes, Myron S. 1972, “The Market for Securities: Substitution versus Price Pressure and the Effects of Information on Share Prices,” Journal of Business, 45, 179-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shleifer, Andrei, 1986, “Do Demand Curves for Stock Slope Down?” Journal of Finance, 41, 579-590.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Welch, I., 1989, “Seasoned Offerings, Imitation Costs, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings,” Journal of Finance, 44, 421-450.zh_TW