學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 員工分紅配股之激勵效果與公司治理機制對其之影響
作者 馮煜棻
貢獻者 李志宏
馮煜棻
關鍵詞 員工分紅配股
公司治理
激勵制度
日期 2002
上傳時間 2009-09-14
摘要 摘要
     員工分紅配股乃目前企業實施頗為普遍的激勵制度,以產業為區分尤以高科技業實施的比率最高,儘管多數實施員工分紅配股的企業多認為其為一有效的激勵措施,然企業之員工分紅配股政策與數量卻遭受投資人與學界的諸多質疑,本研究之目的乃希望了解員工分紅配股之實施對於企業之獲利能力與員工生產力之影響,此外,因員工分紅配股政策應受公司股東會與董監事會之監督,股東如對公司的員工分紅配股政策不滿,可以透過股東會來影響公司之決策,董監事亦須扮演監督之角色,因此公司之治理機制可能影響員工分紅配股政策,進一步影響員工分紅配股對公司績效的影響,因而本研究加入公司治理機制之構面,討論當公司治理機制不同時,員工分紅配股對於公司績效的影響是否不同。
     本研究之實證結果發現:員工分紅配股的實施與否與公司績效有關,當公司績效好時較可能實施員工分紅配股,但員工分紅配股之實施未必提高公司績效,亦即員工分紅配股的實施不保證能提升公司績效,亦發現員工分紅配股數量與公司績效的關係並不明顯,而進一步加入公司治理機制的構面考量時可知,大多數情況下員工分紅配股對公司績效的影響不因公司治理機制之差異而有不同。
參考文獻 附錄:參考文獻
英文
1.Allen Cheadle (1989), Explaining Patterns of Profit-Sharing Activity, Industrial Relations, Vol. 28, No.3 (Fall 1989)
2.Atreya Chakraborty and Christopher F. Baum, Poison Pills, Optimal Contracting and the Market for Corporate Control: Evidence from Fortune 500 Firms
3.Conte, M.A. & J. Svejnar, 1990, “The performance affects of employee ownership plans” in A.S. Blinder (ed.), Paging for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Brooking Institute, Washington D.C.
4.Conte, Michael A Jun 1992, Contingent Compensation: (How) Does It Affect Company Performance? Journal of Economic Issues; Lincoln
5.Conte, Michael A, Financial Management, ESOPs and Profit-Sharing Plans: Do They Link Employee Pay to Company Performance? Tampa; Winter 1991; Vol. 20, Iss. 4
6.Jensen M. C. and W.H. Meckling 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure, Journal of financial economics 3
7.Jensen M. C. and Jerold B. Warner 1988, The Distribution of Power among Corporate Managers, Shareholders, and Directors, Journal of financial economics 20
8.Joseph Blasi, Michael Conte and Douglas Kruse, Employee stock ownership and corporate performance among public companies, Industrial and Labor relationship review, Vol. 50, No 1
9.Joseph Blasi, Douglas Kruse, James Sesil, Maya Kroumova, Public Companies with Broad-Based Stock Options: Corporate Performance from 1992-1997, The National Center for Employee ownership
10.James C. Sesil, Douglas L. Kruse, Joseph R. Blasi, Sharing Ownership via Employee Stock Ownership, July 2001, United Nation University, WIDER
11.James F. Cotter, Anil Shivdasani and Marc Zenner 1997, Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of financial economics 43
12.John W. Byrd and Kent A. Hickman 1992, Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids, Journal of financial economics 32
13.Marion Festing, Yvonne Groening, Rüdiger Kabst and Wolfgang Weber 1999, Financial Participation in Europe—Determinants and Outcomes
14.Martin and Richard, Shared Modes of compensation and firm performance: UK evidence, March 2001
15.Michael Poole 1988, Factors Affecting the Development of Employee Financial Participation in Contemporary Britain: Evidence from a National Survey, British Journal of Industrial Relations 26
16.Michael S. Weisbach 1988, Outside Directors and CEO turnover, Journal of financial economics 20
17.Nalbantian, H.R., & Schotter, A. (1997) Productivity under group incentives: An experimental study. The American Economic Review, 87(3)
18.Noel Cahill, Profit sharing, Employee share ownership and gain-sharing: what can they achieve? NATIONAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL, Research Series, No. 4, May 2000
19.Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Sheleifer, and Robert W. Vishny 1998, Law and Finance, Journal of political economy, Vol. 106(6)
20.Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Sheleifer 1999, Corporate governance around the world, Journal of Finance, Vol.54 (2)
21.Randall Morck, Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny 1988, Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of financial economics 20
22.Sangsoo Park and Moon H. Song, Employees stock ownership plans, Firm performance, and monitoring by outside blockholders, Financial Management, Vol. 24, NO 4, winter 19956.
23.Stijn Claessens, Simeon Djankov, and Larry H.P. Lang 1999, Who control east asian corporation? World Bank, The University of Chicago
24.Stuart Rosenstein and Jeffrey G. Wyatt 1990, Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth, Journal of financial economics 26
25.Tzu-Shian Han, The effect of profit sharing and employees stock ownership plans: The case of Taiwan’s High- Tech firms, FOR THE ECONOMICS OF PARTICIPATION (IAFEP), Catholic University of Brussels
26.Weitzman, Martin L., and Douglas L. Kruse. 1990. "Profit Sharing and Productivity." In Alan S. Blinder, ed., Paying for Productivity, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution
27.Zahid Iqbal, Shaikh Abdul Hamid, Stock Price and Operating Performance of ESOP firms: A time series analysis, QJBE Summer 2000, Vol.39, NO 3
中文
1.台灣高科技奇蹟之國家競爭力泉源探尋─台式員工分紅入股制度之研究 產業論壇 2002 第三券 第二期 陳安斌、王信文
2.員工分紅入股 有其存在意義與價值 施振榮 2002-08-01/經濟日報/4版/綜合新聞
3.台灣企業員工激勵計畫~引進利潤分享計畫與股票選擇權 范欽舜 2000 政治大學財管所碩士論文
4.分紅入股制度對公司績效之影響:以台灣高科技產業為例,汪美伶 2001 台灣大學商學研究所博士論文
5.台灣電子資訊公司分紅入股措施對員工生產力之影響,范姜如萱 2001 中央大學人力資源研究所碩士論文
6.台灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究,林玉霞 2002 中原大學會計研究所碩士論文

公司治理與評等系統 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩 2002 商智文化
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理研究所
90357011
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090357011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 李志宏zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 馮煜棻zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 馮煜棻zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-14-
dc.date.available 2009-09-14-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2009-09-14-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0090357011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30965-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財務管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90357011zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 摘要
     員工分紅配股乃目前企業實施頗為普遍的激勵制度,以產業為區分尤以高科技業實施的比率最高,儘管多數實施員工分紅配股的企業多認為其為一有效的激勵措施,然企業之員工分紅配股政策與數量卻遭受投資人與學界的諸多質疑,本研究之目的乃希望了解員工分紅配股之實施對於企業之獲利能力與員工生產力之影響,此外,因員工分紅配股政策應受公司股東會與董監事會之監督,股東如對公司的員工分紅配股政策不滿,可以透過股東會來影響公司之決策,董監事亦須扮演監督之角色,因此公司之治理機制可能影響員工分紅配股政策,進一步影響員工分紅配股對公司績效的影響,因而本研究加入公司治理機制之構面,討論當公司治理機制不同時,員工分紅配股對於公司績效的影響是否不同。
     本研究之實證結果發現:員工分紅配股的實施與否與公司績效有關,當公司績效好時較可能實施員工分紅配股,但員工分紅配股之實施未必提高公司績效,亦即員工分紅配股的實施不保證能提升公司績效,亦發現員工分紅配股數量與公司績效的關係並不明顯,而進一步加入公司治理機制的構面考量時可知,大多數情況下員工分紅配股對公司績效的影響不因公司治理機制之差異而有不同。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 目 錄
     第一章 研究動機與主題………………………………………………1
     第一節 研究動機…………………………………………...1
     第二節 研究主題…………………………………………...7
     第三節 研究架構…………………………………………...9
     
     
     第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………..10
     
     第一節 代理問題與誘因制度…………………………….11
     第二節 員工分紅配股相關文獻探討…………………….12
     第三節 公司治理相關文獻……………………………….23
     
     
     第三章 研究方法………………………..……………………………34
     
     第一節 樣本選取與資料來源…………………………….34
     第二節 員工分紅配股與公司績效之關係……………….34
     第三節 公司治理機制之定義…………………………….40
     第四節 公司治理機制對員工分紅配股有效性之影響….48
     
     
     第四章 實證結果……………………………………………………..53
     
     第一節 員工分紅配股與公司績效之關係……………….53
     第二節 員工分紅配股公司之治理機制………………….62
     第三節 公司治理機制對員工分紅配股有效性之影響….66
     
     
     第五章 結論與建議…………………………………………..………80
     第一節 結論……………………………………………….80
     第二節 建議……………………………………………….82
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090357011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 員工分紅配股zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 激勵制度zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 員工分紅配股之激勵效果與公司治理機制對其之影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 附錄:參考文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.Allen Cheadle (1989), Explaining Patterns of Profit-Sharing Activity, Industrial Relations, Vol. 28, No.3 (Fall 1989)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.Atreya Chakraborty and Christopher F. Baum, Poison Pills, Optimal Contracting and the Market for Corporate Control: Evidence from Fortune 500 Firmszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.Conte, M.A. & J. Svejnar, 1990, “The performance affects of employee ownership plans” in A.S. Blinder (ed.), Paging for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Brooking Institute, Washington D.C.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.Conte, Michael A Jun 1992, Contingent Compensation: (How) Does It Affect Company Performance? Journal of Economic Issues; Lincolnzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.Conte, Michael A, Financial Management, ESOPs and Profit-Sharing Plans: Do They Link Employee Pay to Company Performance? Tampa; Winter 1991; Vol. 20, Iss. 4zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.Jensen M. C. and W.H. Meckling 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure, Journal of financial economics 3zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.Jensen M. C. and Jerold B. Warner 1988, The Distribution of Power among Corporate Managers, Shareholders, and Directors, Journal of financial economics 20zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.Joseph Blasi, Michael Conte and Douglas Kruse, Employee stock ownership and corporate performance among public companies, Industrial and Labor relationship review, Vol. 50, No 1zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.Joseph Blasi, Douglas Kruse, James Sesil, Maya Kroumova, Public Companies with Broad-Based Stock Options: Corporate Performance from 1992-1997, The National Center for Employee ownershipzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.James C. Sesil, Douglas L. Kruse, Joseph R. Blasi, Sharing Ownership via Employee Stock Ownership, July 2001, United Nation University, WIDERzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.James F. Cotter, Anil Shivdasani and Marc Zenner 1997, Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of financial economics 43zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.John W. Byrd and Kent A. Hickman 1992, Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids, Journal of financial economics 32zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.Marion Festing, Yvonne Groening, Rüdiger Kabst and Wolfgang Weber 1999, Financial Participation in Europe—Determinants and Outcomeszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.Martin and Richard, Shared Modes of compensation and firm performance: UK evidence, March 2001zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.Michael Poole 1988, Factors Affecting the Development of Employee Financial Participation in Contemporary Britain: Evidence from a National Survey, British Journal of Industrial Relations 26zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.Michael S. Weisbach 1988, Outside Directors and CEO turnover, Journal of financial economics 20zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.Nalbantian, H.R., & Schotter, A. (1997) Productivity under group incentives: An experimental study. The American Economic Review, 87(3)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.Noel Cahill, Profit sharing, Employee share ownership and gain-sharing: what can they achieve? NATIONAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL, Research Series, No. 4, May 2000zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Sheleifer, and Robert W. Vishny 1998, Law and Finance, Journal of political economy, Vol. 106(6)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Sheleifer 1999, Corporate governance around the world, Journal of Finance, Vol.54 (2)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.Randall Morck, Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny 1988, Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of financial economics 20zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.Sangsoo Park and Moon H. Song, Employees stock ownership plans, Firm performance, and monitoring by outside blockholders, Financial Management, Vol. 24, NO 4, winter 19956.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.Stijn Claessens, Simeon Djankov, and Larry H.P. Lang 1999, Who control east asian corporation? World Bank, The University of Chicagozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.Stuart Rosenstein and Jeffrey G. Wyatt 1990, Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth, Journal of financial economics 26zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25.Tzu-Shian Han, The effect of profit sharing and employees stock ownership plans: The case of Taiwan’s High- Tech firms, FOR THE ECONOMICS OF PARTICIPATION (IAFEP), Catholic University of Brusselszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26.Weitzman, Martin L., and Douglas L. Kruse. 1990. "Profit Sharing and Productivity." In Alan S. Blinder, ed., Paying for Productivity, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institutionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27.Zahid Iqbal, Shaikh Abdul Hamid, Stock Price and Operating Performance of ESOP firms: A time series analysis, QJBE Summer 2000, Vol.39, NO 3zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.台灣高科技奇蹟之國家競爭力泉源探尋─台式員工分紅入股制度之研究 產業論壇 2002 第三券 第二期 陳安斌、王信文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.員工分紅入股 有其存在意義與價值 施振榮 2002-08-01/經濟日報/4版/綜合新聞zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.台灣企業員工激勵計畫~引進利潤分享計畫與股票選擇權 范欽舜 2000 政治大學財管所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.分紅入股制度對公司績效之影響:以台灣高科技產業為例,汪美伶 2001 台灣大學商學研究所博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.台灣電子資訊公司分紅入股措施對員工生產力之影響,范姜如萱 2001 中央大學人力資源研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.台灣上市公司代理問題、公司治理與股東價值之研究,林玉霞 2002 中原大學會計研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 公司治理與評等系統 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩 2002 商智文化zh_TW