學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 銀行往來關係對中小企業借款條件與授信風險之影響
作者 唐于雅
貢獻者 劉玉珍<br>張元晨
none<br>
唐于雅
關鍵詞 中小企業
銀行往來關係
借款條件
授信風險
日期 2002
上傳時間 2009-09-14
摘要 中小企業大多屬於未公開發行公司,只能以非公開融資方式取得資金,銀行借款就成為中小企業相當重要的資金來源,然而中小企業由於資訊不對稱問題相對較嚴重,許多中小企業可能無法順利向金融機構獲取足夠資金,過去已有許多國外文獻支持銀行往來關係有助於減輕借貸市場資訊不對稱現象,此種現象可能對中小企業而言尤其重要,因此本文針對台灣已取得銀行授信的中小企業,探討銀行往來關係會如何影響中小企業的擔保要求、與融資額度等借款條件,並討論銀行進行授信時,是否可由企業既有的銀行關係的選擇觀察出企業的授信風險,同時驗證企業與銀行業務往來越密切,對於銀行控管企業授信風險是否能有顯著助益。
      本文的銀行關係的討論著重在借款集中度、往來銀行規模、與銀行監督能力三方面,實證結果發現與單家銀行往來的企業,被要求提供擔保的機會較高,但單家銀行關係的企業比較不會受到融資限制,說明中小企業集中借款,往來銀行由於獨享企業可能帶來的業務利益,私人資訊價值較大,會願意滿足企業的融資需求,然而基於中小企業尋求另一家銀行認可的困難度較高,單一銀行資訊獨佔的優勢,使企業可能反而被要求提供較多擔保品,而多家銀行關係的企業,擔保要求比例雖較低,但是企業卻必須承擔未來申請再融資時,個別銀行貸放意願較低落的風險。在銀行規模的選擇上,由於中小企業對大型銀行的議價能力相對更弱,受到融資限制的可能性較高。在銀行監督能力方面,企業與銀行授信業務項目越多、企業與個人和相同銀行往來,都能顯著降低企業被要求提供擔保的機會,此外,潛在競爭銀行的存在可能可以減輕資訊閉鎖問題,也能降低企業擔保提列的機會。
     在授信風險方面,實證結果發現與單家銀行往來的企業,發生異常授信的可能性較低,多家銀行關係且借款來源分散可能是企業品質低落的訊號;企業與銀行授信業務項目越多,能有助於銀行控管企業授信風險,企業發生異常授信的可能性較低,但是企業、個人是否與相同銀行往來並無法做為觀察企業授信風險的指標。
參考文獻 中文部份
1.李婉慈 (民89),銀行往來關係與公司經營績效及財務危機關聯性分析,中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
2.李樑堅、張志向 (民88),中小企業授信評估模式建立之研究,臺大管理論叢 9,69-100。
3.汪逸真 (民86),企業選擇銀行融資方式之研究,臺灣大學財務金融研究所博士論文。
4.俞海琴 (民81),資訊不對稱下本國銀行放款市場之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
5.柯承恩、葉銀華 (民85),中小企業財務結構與經營績效關係之研究,第二屆中小企業發展學術研討會論文集。
6.胡忠慈 (民91),取法國際經驗,強化我國中小企業融資環境與政策,台灣金融財務季刊第三輯第二期,141-155。
7.殷乃平 (民80),中小企業融資問題與財務結構改善之研究,經濟部中小企業處編印。
8.張宮熊 (民78),台灣信用分配下民間金融體系對中小企業經營績效之影響—以製造業為例,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
9.張麗娟 (民87),中小企業如何與銀行建立良好往來關係,台北銀行月刊第二十七卷第九期,77-89。
10.梁玲菁 (民 87),台灣金融體系與中小企業融資之關係,企銀季刊第二十一卷第三期,73-81。
11.郭憲章、黎法寬 (民88),中小企業信用分析模式之研究,台灣銀行季刊第五十卷第三期,91-113。
12.陳錦村 (民87),競爭、往來關係與銀行授信行為之研究,中國財務學刊,第五卷第三期,61-90。
13.陳家彬、賴怡洵 (民90), 台灣地區銀行放款有無擔保之決定因素-Logistic 模型之實證分析,管理評論,第二十卷第一期,129-159。
14.陳萬清 民87,往來關係、監督結構與銀行授信行為之研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
15.黃重菁 (民87) ,銀行對中小企業授信考量因素之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
16.楊雅惠 (民88),化解中小企業的資金困境,經濟前瞻,72-75。
17.葉子謀 (民87),銀行如何爭取與中小企業負責人往來,台北銀行月刊第二十七卷第三期,68-71。
18.劉玉皙 (民90),銀行往來關係對中小企業信用評等之影響,政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
19.劉凌峰 (民87) ,中小企業之財務問題研究—以電子零組件貿易商為例,中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。
20.鄭必群 (民89),中小企業融資實務篇---如何與銀行廣結善緣,會計研究月刊第175期,122-124。
21.中小企業白皮書,民國91年,經濟部發行。
22.經濟部,中小企業融資指南,台北,經濟部中小企業處,民國八十八年。
23.「銀行對企業授信規範」,金融研訓中心出版,民國八十八年。
24.「中小企業融資及市場行銷之研究」,經濟部中華經濟研究院主編,民國八十二年。
英文部份
1. Ang J.S., Lin J.W. and Tyler F., 1995, “Evidence on the lack of separation between business and personal risks among small businesses”, The Journal of Small Business Finance, 197-210.
2. Avery R.B , Bostic R. W and Samolyk K. A, 1998, “The role of personal wealth in small business finance”, Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 1019-1061.
3. Berger A. and Udell G., 1990, “Collateral, loan quality, and bank risk”, Journal of Monetary Economics 25, 21-42.
4. Berger A. and Udell G., 1995, “ Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance ”, Journal of Business 68, 351-381.
5. Berger A. and Udell G., 2002, “Small business credit availability and relationship lending: the importance of bank organizational structure”, Working Paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
6. Bester H., 1985, “Screening vs. rationing in credit markets with imperfect information ” , American Economic Review 57, 850-855.
7. Blackwell D. W. and Winters D.B., 1997, “ Banking Relationships And The Effect of Monitoring on Loan Pricing ”, Journal of Financial Research, 275-289.
8. Biais B. and Gollier C., 1997, ” Trade credit and credit rationing”, The Review of Financial Studies 10, 903-937.
9. Bodt E.D, Lobez F. and Statnik J.C, 2001, “Credit Rationing, Customer Relationship and the number of banks: an empirical analysis”, Working Paper University catholique de Louvain.
10. Boot A.W.A., and Thakor A.V., 1994, “ Moral Hazard and Secured Lending in an Infinitely Repeated Credit Market Game”, International Economic Review 35, 899-920.
11. Boot A.W.A., 2000, ” Relationship Banking: What do we know?”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 7-25.
12. Boot A.W. A., Thakor A.V and Udell G. F, 1991 , “ Secured lending and default risk: equilibrium analysis, policy implications and empirical results”, The Economic Journal, 458-472.
13. Brau J.C. , 2002, “Do banks price owner-manager agency costs? an examination of small business borrowing”, Journal of small business management , 273-286.
14. Bulow J. and Shoven J., 1978, “The bankruptcy decision”, Bell Journal of Economics 9, 437-456
15. Cavalluzzo K. and Wolken J.D. , 2002, “Small business loan turndowns, personal wealth and discrimination”, Working Paper Georgetown University.
16. Cavalluzzo K. and Cavalluzzo L., 1998, “Market structure and discrimination: the case of small businesses”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30, 771-792.
17. Cavalluzzo K., Cavalluzzo L.,and Wolken J.D., 2002, “Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: Evidence form a new survey”, Journal of Business, 641-679.
18. Cole R.A., 1998, “The importance of relationships to the availability of credit ”, Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 959-977.
19. Cukierman A., 1978, “The Horizontal Integration of the Banking Firm, Credit Rationing and Monetary Policy”, The Review of Economic Studies 45, 165-178.
20. Degryse H. and Van Cayseele P., 2000 , “Relationship lending within a bank-based system: evidence form European small business data”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 90-109.
21. Detragiache, E., Garella P., and Guiso L., 2000, “ Multiple versus Single Banking Relationships ”, Journal of Finance , 1133-1159.
22. Diamond D. W., 1984, “ Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring ”, Review of Economic Studies 51, 393-414.
23. Diamond, D. W., 1991, “ Monitoring and reputation: the choice between bank loans and directly placed debt ”, Journal of Political Economy 99, 689-751.
24. Ennew C. T. and Binks M. R., 1995, “The provision of finance to small businesses: does the banking relationship constrain performance”, Journal of Small Business Finance, 57-73.
25. Elsas R. and Krahnen J. P., 1998, “ Is relationship lending special? evidence form credit-file data in Germany “ , Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 1283-1316.
26. Elsas R. and Krahnen J. P., 2000, “Collateral, default risk, and relationship lending: an empirical study on financial contracting” , Working Paper Goethe-University Frankfurt.
27. Fama E., 1985, “ What’s different about banks? ”, Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 29-39.
28. Farinha L. and Santos J. A., 2000, “ Switching form single to multiple bank lending relationships: determinants and implications”, Working Paper. Bank for international settlements (BIS).
29. Fluck, Z. D., Holtz-Eakin, and Rosen H.S., 1997 ,”Where does the money Come from? the financing of small entrepreneurial enterprises ” Working Paper , New York University.
30. Foglia A., Laviola S. and Reedtz M., 1998 , “ Multiple banking relationships and the fragility of corporate borrowers “, Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 1441-1456.
31.Gardner M.J. and Mills D.L., 1989, “Evaluating the likelihood of default on delinquent loans”, Financial Management, 55-63.
32. Harhoff D. and Korting T. 1998, “Lending relationships in Germany: empirical evidence from survey data”, Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 1317-1353.
33. Haubrich J. G., 1989, “Financial intermediation delegated monitoring and long-term relationships”, Journal of Banking and Finance 13, 9-20.
34. Hodgman D.R., 1960, “Credit risk and credit rationing”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 258-278.
35. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., and Scharfstein, D., 1991, “ Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment evidence from Japanese industrial groups”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 33-60.
36. Johnston J. and DiNardo J., 1997, ”Econometric Methods” , p412-426, 436-441
37. Mester, L. J., Nakamura L., and Renault M., 1998, “Checking accounts and bank monitoring ”, Mimeo Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
38. Merton R.C., 1992, “Operation and regulation in financial intermediation: a functional perspective ”, Working paper No. 93-020.
39. Ongena S. and Smith D., 2000, “What determines the number of bank relationships? cross-country evidence”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 26-56.
40. Petersen M. A. and Rajan R., 1994, “The benefits of lending relationships: evidence from small business data ”, Journal of Finance 49, 3-37.
41. Padilla A. J. and Pagano M., 1997, “Endogenous Communication among lenders and entrepreneurial incentives”, Review of Financial Studies 10, 105-236.
42. Rajan R., 1992, “ Insiders and outsiders: the choice between informed and arm’s length debt ”, Journal of Finance 47, 1367-1400.
43. Sharpe S., 1990, “ Asymmetric information, bank lending, and implicit contracts: a stylized model of customer relations ”, Journal of Finance 45, 1069-1087.
44. Stiglitz J. and Weiss A., 1981, “Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information ”, American Economic Review 71, 393-410.
45. Thakor A. V., 1996, “Capital requirements, monetary policy, and aggregate bank lending: Theory and empirical evidence”, Journal of Finance, 279-324.
46 Von Thadden, Ernst-Ludwig, 1994, “The commitment of finance, duplicated monitoring, and the investment horizon”, Unpublished manuscript, Basel University.
47. Von Thadden.,1995,“Long-term contracts, short-term investment and monitoring”, Review of Economic Studies 62, 557-575.
48. Yosha O., 1995, “ Information disclosure costs and the choice of financing source”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 4, 3-20.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理研究所
90357021
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090357021
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 劉玉珍<br>張元晨zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor none<br>en_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 唐于雅zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 唐于雅zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-14-
dc.date.available 2009-09-14-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 2009-09-14-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0090357021en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30967-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財務管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90357021zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 中小企業大多屬於未公開發行公司,只能以非公開融資方式取得資金,銀行借款就成為中小企業相當重要的資金來源,然而中小企業由於資訊不對稱問題相對較嚴重,許多中小企業可能無法順利向金融機構獲取足夠資金,過去已有許多國外文獻支持銀行往來關係有助於減輕借貸市場資訊不對稱現象,此種現象可能對中小企業而言尤其重要,因此本文針對台灣已取得銀行授信的中小企業,探討銀行往來關係會如何影響中小企業的擔保要求、與融資額度等借款條件,並討論銀行進行授信時,是否可由企業既有的銀行關係的選擇觀察出企業的授信風險,同時驗證企業與銀行業務往來越密切,對於銀行控管企業授信風險是否能有顯著助益。
      本文的銀行關係的討論著重在借款集中度、往來銀行規模、與銀行監督能力三方面,實證結果發現與單家銀行往來的企業,被要求提供擔保的機會較高,但單家銀行關係的企業比較不會受到融資限制,說明中小企業集中借款,往來銀行由於獨享企業可能帶來的業務利益,私人資訊價值較大,會願意滿足企業的融資需求,然而基於中小企業尋求另一家銀行認可的困難度較高,單一銀行資訊獨佔的優勢,使企業可能反而被要求提供較多擔保品,而多家銀行關係的企業,擔保要求比例雖較低,但是企業卻必須承擔未來申請再融資時,個別銀行貸放意願較低落的風險。在銀行規模的選擇上,由於中小企業對大型銀行的議價能力相對更弱,受到融資限制的可能性較高。在銀行監督能力方面,企業與銀行授信業務項目越多、企業與個人和相同銀行往來,都能顯著降低企業被要求提供擔保的機會,此外,潛在競爭銀行的存在可能可以減輕資訊閉鎖問題,也能降低企業擔保提列的機會。
     在授信風險方面,實證結果發現與單家銀行往來的企業,發生異常授信的可能性較低,多家銀行關係且借款來源分散可能是企業品質低落的訊號;企業與銀行授信業務項目越多,能有助於銀行控管企業授信風險,企業發生異常授信的可能性較低,但是企業、個人是否與相同銀行往來並無法做為觀察企業授信風險的指標。
zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄
     第一章 緒論---------------------------------------------1
     第一節 研究動機------------------------------------------2
     第二節 研究主題------------------------------------------3
     第三節 研究架構------------------------------------------5
     
     第二章 文獻回顧-----------------------------------------6
     第一節 借款市場資訊不對稱現象----------------------------6
     第二節 中小企業的融資特性--------------------------------9
      第三節 銀行往來關係對借款條件的影響--------------------14
      第四節 銀行往來關係與信用風險------------------------- 26
     
     第三章 研究方法-----------------------------------------29
     第一節 資料來源------------------------------------------29
     第二節 變數定義------------------------------------------30
     第三節 研究假說------------------------------------------38
     第四節 實證方法------------------------------------------43
     
     第四章 實證結果與分析------------------------------------47
     第一節 樣本描述與敘述性統計結果---------------------------47
     第二節 銀行往來關係與擔保要求分析-------------------------53
     第三節 銀行往來關係與融資能力分析-------------------------62
     第四節 銀行往來關係與授信風險分析-------------------------71
     
     第五章 結論與建議---------------------------------------76
     第一節 結論-----------------------------------------------76
     第二節 研究限制與建議-------------------------------------81
     
     參考文獻----------------------------------------------------84
     
     
     
     
     表目次
     表2.1 中小企業融資特性表-----------------------------------10
     表2.2 中小企業、大企業資金來源比重表-----------------------12
     表2.3 歷年一般銀行對中小企業放款餘額統計表-----------------13
     表2.4 中小企業銀行往來家數概況表---------------------------18
     
     表3.1 總樣本企業與個人授信概況-----------------------------29
     表3.2 樣本年度與產業分佈表---------------------------------30
     表3.3 中長期放款擔保提列概況-------------------------------32
     
     表4.1 總樣本敘述性統計表-----------------------------------47
     表4.2 借款集中度表-----------------------------------------49
     表4.3 分類樣本敘述統計表 ----------------------------------52
     表4.4 擔保放款比例迴歸結果表-------------------------------54
     表4.5 中長期借款是否要求擔保迴歸結果表---------------------55
     表4.6 中長期借款是否要求擔保分類樣本迴歸結果表-------------61
     表4.7 企業訂約金額迴歸結果表-------------------------------64
     表4.8 是否使用個人融資迴歸結果表---------------------------68
     表4.9 是否使用個人融資分類樣本迴歸結果表-------------------70
     表4.10 企業是否有異常授信迴歸結果表-------------------------75
     
     圖目次
     圖4.1 銀行家數次數分配圖-----------------------------------49
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090357021en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 中小企業zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 銀行往來關係zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 借款條件zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 授信風險zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 銀行往來關係對中小企業借款條件與授信風險之影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1.李婉慈 (民89),銀行往來關係與公司經營績效及財務危機關聯性分析,中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2.李樑堅、張志向 (民88),中小企業授信評估模式建立之研究,臺大管理論叢 9,69-100。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3.汪逸真 (民86),企業選擇銀行融資方式之研究,臺灣大學財務金融研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4.俞海琴 (民81),資訊不對稱下本國銀行放款市場之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5.柯承恩、葉銀華 (民85),中小企業財務結構與經營績效關係之研究,第二屆中小企業發展學術研討會論文集。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6.胡忠慈 (民91),取法國際經驗,強化我國中小企業融資環境與政策,台灣金融財務季刊第三輯第二期,141-155。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7.殷乃平 (民80),中小企業融資問題與財務結構改善之研究,經濟部中小企業處編印。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8.張宮熊 (民78),台灣信用分配下民間金融體系對中小企業經營績效之影響—以製造業為例,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9.張麗娟 (民87),中小企業如何與銀行建立良好往來關係,台北銀行月刊第二十七卷第九期,77-89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10.梁玲菁 (民 87),台灣金融體系與中小企業融資之關係,企銀季刊第二十一卷第三期,73-81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11.郭憲章、黎法寬 (民88),中小企業信用分析模式之研究,台灣銀行季刊第五十卷第三期,91-113。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12.陳錦村 (民87),競爭、往來關係與銀行授信行為之研究,中國財務學刊,第五卷第三期,61-90。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13.陳家彬、賴怡洵 (民90), 台灣地區銀行放款有無擔保之決定因素-Logistic 模型之實證分析,管理評論,第二十卷第一期,129-159。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14.陳萬清 民87,往來關係、監督結構與銀行授信行為之研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15.黃重菁 (民87) ,銀行對中小企業授信考量因素之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16.楊雅惠 (民88),化解中小企業的資金困境,經濟前瞻,72-75。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17.葉子謀 (民87),銀行如何爭取與中小企業負責人往來,台北銀行月刊第二十七卷第三期,68-71。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18.劉玉皙 (民90),銀行往來關係對中小企業信用評等之影響,政治大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19.劉凌峰 (民87) ,中小企業之財務問題研究—以電子零組件貿易商為例,中山大學財務管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20.鄭必群 (民89),中小企業融資實務篇---如何與銀行廣結善緣,會計研究月刊第175期,122-124。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21.中小企業白皮書,民國91年,經濟部發行。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22.經濟部,中小企業融資指南,台北,經濟部中小企業處,民國八十八年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23.「銀行對企業授信規範」,金融研訓中心出版,民國八十八年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24.「中小企業融資及市場行銷之研究」,經濟部中華經濟研究院主編,民國八十二年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Ang J.S., Lin J.W. and Tyler F., 1995, “Evidence on the lack of separation between business and personal risks among small businesses”, The Journal of Small Business Finance, 197-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Avery R.B , Bostic R. W and Samolyk K. A, 1998, “The role of personal wealth in small business finance”, Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 1019-1061.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Berger A. and Udell G., 1990, “Collateral, loan quality, and bank risk”, Journal of Monetary Economics 25, 21-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Berger A. and Udell G., 1995, “ Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance ”, Journal of Business 68, 351-381.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Berger A. and Udell G., 2002, “Small business credit availability and relationship lending: the importance of bank organizational structure”, Working Paper, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Bester H., 1985, “Screening vs. rationing in credit markets with imperfect information ” , American Economic Review 57, 850-855.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Blackwell D. W. and Winters D.B., 1997, “ Banking Relationships And The Effect of Monitoring on Loan Pricing ”, Journal of Financial Research, 275-289.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Biais B. and Gollier C., 1997, ” Trade credit and credit rationing”, The Review of Financial Studies 10, 903-937.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Bodt E.D, Lobez F. and Statnik J.C, 2001, “Credit Rationing, Customer Relationship and the number of banks: an empirical analysis”, Working Paper University catholique de Louvain.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Boot A.W.A., and Thakor A.V., 1994, “ Moral Hazard and Secured Lending in an Infinitely Repeated Credit Market Game”, International Economic Review 35, 899-920.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Boot A.W.A., 2000, ” Relationship Banking: What do we know?”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 7-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Boot A.W. A., Thakor A.V and Udell G. F, 1991 , “ Secured lending and default risk: equilibrium analysis, policy implications and empirical results”, The Economic Journal, 458-472.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Brau J.C. , 2002, “Do banks price owner-manager agency costs? an examination of small business borrowing”, Journal of small business management , 273-286.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. Bulow J. and Shoven J., 1978, “The bankruptcy decision”, Bell Journal of Economics 9, 437-456zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. Cavalluzzo K. and Wolken J.D. , 2002, “Small business loan turndowns, personal wealth and discrimination”, Working Paper Georgetown University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. Cavalluzzo K. and Cavalluzzo L., 1998, “Market structure and discrimination: the case of small businesses”, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 30, 771-792.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. Cavalluzzo K., Cavalluzzo L.,and Wolken J.D., 2002, “Competition, small business financing, and discrimination: Evidence form a new survey”, Journal of Business, 641-679.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. Cole R.A., 1998, “The importance of relationships to the availability of credit ”, Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 959-977.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 19. Cukierman A., 1978, “The Horizontal Integration of the Banking Firm, Credit Rationing and Monetary Policy”, The Review of Economic Studies 45, 165-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20. Degryse H. and Van Cayseele P., 2000 , “Relationship lending within a bank-based system: evidence form European small business data”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 90-109.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 21. Detragiache, E., Garella P., and Guiso L., 2000, “ Multiple versus Single Banking Relationships ”, Journal of Finance , 1133-1159.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22. Diamond D. W., 1984, “ Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring ”, Review of Economic Studies 51, 393-414.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 23. Diamond, D. W., 1991, “ Monitoring and reputation: the choice between bank loans and directly placed debt ”, Journal of Political Economy 99, 689-751.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 24. Ennew C. T. and Binks M. R., 1995, “The provision of finance to small businesses: does the banking relationship constrain performance”, Journal of Small Business Finance, 57-73.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 25. Elsas R. and Krahnen J. P., 1998, “ Is relationship lending special? evidence form credit-file data in Germany “ , Journal of Banking and Finance 22 , 1283-1316.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 26. Elsas R. and Krahnen J. P., 2000, “Collateral, default risk, and relationship lending: an empirical study on financial contracting” , Working Paper Goethe-University Frankfurt.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 27. Fama E., 1985, “ What’s different about banks? ”, Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 29-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 28. Farinha L. and Santos J. A., 2000, “ Switching form single to multiple bank lending relationships: determinants and implications”, Working Paper. Bank for international settlements (BIS).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 29. Fluck, Z. D., Holtz-Eakin, and Rosen H.S., 1997 ,”Where does the money Come from? the financing of small entrepreneurial enterprises ” Working Paper , New York University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 30. Foglia A., Laviola S. and Reedtz M., 1998 , “ Multiple banking relationships and the fragility of corporate borrowers “, Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 1441-1456.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 31.Gardner M.J. and Mills D.L., 1989, “Evaluating the likelihood of default on delinquent loans”, Financial Management, 55-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 32. Harhoff D. and Korting T. 1998, “Lending relationships in Germany: empirical evidence from survey data”, Journal of Banking and Finance 22, 1317-1353.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 33. Haubrich J. G., 1989, “Financial intermediation delegated monitoring and long-term relationships”, Journal of Banking and Finance 13, 9-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 34. Hodgman D.R., 1960, “Credit risk and credit rationing”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 258-278.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 35. Hoshi, T., Kashyap, A., and Scharfstein, D., 1991, “ Corporate structure, liquidity, and investment evidence from Japanese industrial groups”, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 33-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 36. Johnston J. and DiNardo J., 1997, ”Econometric Methods” , p412-426, 436-441zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 37. Mester, L. J., Nakamura L., and Renault M., 1998, “Checking accounts and bank monitoring ”, Mimeo Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 38. Merton R.C., 1992, “Operation and regulation in financial intermediation: a functional perspective ”, Working paper No. 93-020.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 39. Ongena S. and Smith D., 2000, “What determines the number of bank relationships? cross-country evidence”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 9, 26-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 40. Petersen M. A. and Rajan R., 1994, “The benefits of lending relationships: evidence from small business data ”, Journal of Finance 49, 3-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41. Padilla A. J. and Pagano M., 1997, “Endogenous Communication among lenders and entrepreneurial incentives”, Review of Financial Studies 10, 105-236.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 42. Rajan R., 1992, “ Insiders and outsiders: the choice between informed and arm’s length debt ”, Journal of Finance 47, 1367-1400.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 43. Sharpe S., 1990, “ Asymmetric information, bank lending, and implicit contracts: a stylized model of customer relations ”, Journal of Finance 45, 1069-1087.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 44. Stiglitz J. and Weiss A., 1981, “Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information ”, American Economic Review 71, 393-410.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 45. Thakor A. V., 1996, “Capital requirements, monetary policy, and aggregate bank lending: Theory and empirical evidence”, Journal of Finance, 279-324.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 46 Von Thadden, Ernst-Ludwig, 1994, “The commitment of finance, duplicated monitoring, and the investment horizon”, Unpublished manuscript, Basel University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 47. Von Thadden.,1995,“Long-term contracts, short-term investment and monitoring”, Review of Economic Studies 62, 557-575.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 48. Yosha O., 1995, “ Information disclosure costs and the choice of financing source”, Journal of Financial Intermediation 4, 3-20.zh_TW