學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 詢價圈購之資訊內涵對承銷價格之影響
作者 光心立
貢獻者 劉玉珍
光心立
關鍵詞 詢價圈購
承銷
訂價
Bookbuilding
IPO
pricing
日期 2007
上傳時間 14-Sep-2009 09:02:28 (UTC+8)
摘要   詢價圈購理論提出承銷商可藉由詢價圈購的過程,誘使投資人藉由圈購的價量提供私有資訊,進而提升價格發現的效果。國外實證研究亦發現承銷商在訂價時廣泛使用詢價圈購過程所獲得的資訊,並會依據投資人對IPO股票的需求調整承銷價格。
       本研究針對民國93年5月初至民國96年5月底,共計66個普通股初次上市(櫃)案件進行實證研究,以探討詢價圈購資訊內涵對於發行價格之影響,並觀察詢價圈購資訊與IPO後股價報酬率之間的關連性。
       經由實證結果發現我國承銷商在訂價時會參考加權平均圈購價格與圈購價格集中度所提供的資訊,而超額認購是較為次要的參考依據。相較於國外投資銀行,我國承銷商在訂價時並未大幅參考投資人圈購時所提供之資訊。承銷商在訂定發行價格時較為重視圈購數量較多的投資人所提供之資訊,並且機構投資人對承銷商而言具有較高的資訊內涵價值。超額認購是所有詢價圈購資訊中,對於IPO後股票報酬率最有預測能力的變數,代表我國承銷商在訂價時並未完全將超額認購所提供的資訊反映至發行價格上。
Under bookbuilding process, underwriters can use relevant information from investors to price the issue more accurately. Previous studies also found that underwriters extensively use the information contained in the book and partially adjusted issue price to private information collected during the IPO process. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether underwriters use the information content of investors’ bids in IPOs when setting the issue price and to investigate whether this information can predict aftermarket returns. This paper analyzes 66 IPO issues between early 2004 and late 2007. The results suggest that weighted average limit price and the concentration of limit price are related to the issue price, and the level of oversubscription is minor factor to price setting. In addition, large bidders and institutional investors’ bids have information advantage and can provide helpful information to underwriters. Moreover, Oversubscription can predict aftermarket returns, suggesting that underwriters might not use all the information available when setting the issue price.
參考文獻 中文部分
1. 劉玉珍、李怡宗、光心立、李淑瑜,「我國有價證券配售對象規範之合理性研究」,中華民國證券商業同業公會委託計畫,2007年11月
2. 劉玉珍、陳薇如,為何詢價圈購方式逐漸取代競價拍賣?,證券暨期貨月刊,2004年5月,16-31頁
英文部分
1. Agarwal, S., C. Liu and S. G. Rhee, 2008, “Investor Demand for IPOs and Aftermarket Performance: Evidence from Hong Kong Stock Market, ” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18, 176-190.
2. Aggarwal, R., N. R. Prabhala and M. Puri, 2002, “Institutional Allocation in Initial Public Offerings: Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Finance, 57, 1421-1442.
3. Benveniste, L. M. and P. A. Spindt , 1989, “How Investment Bankers Determine the Offer Price and Allocation of New Issues,” Journal of Financial Economics , 24, 343-361.
4. Benveniste, L. M. and W. J. Wilhelm, 1990, “A Comparative Analysis of IPO Proceeds under Alternative Regulatory Environments.” Journal of Financial Economics, 28, 173-208.
5. Binay, M. M. and C. A. Pirinsky, 2003, “How Important is Relationship for Underwriters and Institutional Investors,” working paper.
6. Bradley, D. J. and B. D. Jordan, 2002, “Public Information and Aftermarket Return in IPOs,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 595-616.
7. Chemmanur, T. J. and G. Hu, 2007, “Institutional Trading, Allocation Sales, and Private Information in IPOs,” EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings Paper.
8. Cornelli, F. and D. Goldreich, 2003, “Bookbuilding: How Informative is the Order Book?” Journal of Finance , 58, 1415-1444.
9. Cornelli, F. and D. Goldreich, 2001, “Bookbuilding and Strategic Allocation, ” Journal of Finance , 56, 2337-2369.
10. Derrien, F., 2005, “IPO Pricing in HOT Market Conditions: Who Leaves Money on the Table? ” Journal of Finance, 60, 487-521.
11. Hanley, K. W, 1993, “The Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings and the Partial Adjustment Phenomenon, ” Journal of Financial Economics, 34, 231-250.
12. Huyghebaert, N. and C. Van Hulle, 2006, “Bookbuilding and Share Pre-allocation in IPOs,” in Gregoriou, G. (ed) Initial Public Offerings: An International Perspective (Elsevier Press London, UK).
13. Jenkinson, T. and H. Jones, 2004, “Bids and Allocations in European IPO Bookbuilding,” Journal of Finance, 59, 2309-2338.
14. Ljungqvist, A. P., and W. J. Wilhelm, 2002, “IPO Allocations: Discriminatory or Discretionary? ” Journal of Financial Economics ,65, 167-201.
15. Loughran, T. and J. Ritter, 2002, “Why Don’t Issuers Get Upset about Leaving Money on the Table in IPOs?” Review of Financial Studies, 15, 413-443.
16. Rock, K., 1986, “Why New Issues are Underpriced? ” Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 187-212.
17. Sherman, A. E. and S. Titman, 2002, “Building the IPO order Book: Underpricing and Participation Limits with Costly Information,” Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 3-29.
18. Spatt, C. and S. Srivastava, 1991, “Preplay Communication, Participation Restrictions, and Efficiency in Initial Public Offerings,” Review of Financial Studies ,4, 709-726.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
財務管理研究所
95357006
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095357006
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 劉玉珍zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 光心立zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 光心立zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 14-Sep-2009 09:02:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-Sep-2009 09:02:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 14-Sep-2009 09:02:28 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0095357006en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31002-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 財務管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95357006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要)   詢價圈購理論提出承銷商可藉由詢價圈購的過程,誘使投資人藉由圈購的價量提供私有資訊,進而提升價格發現的效果。國外實證研究亦發現承銷商在訂價時廣泛使用詢價圈購過程所獲得的資訊,並會依據投資人對IPO股票的需求調整承銷價格。
       本研究針對民國93年5月初至民國96年5月底,共計66個普通股初次上市(櫃)案件進行實證研究,以探討詢價圈購資訊內涵對於發行價格之影響,並觀察詢價圈購資訊與IPO後股價報酬率之間的關連性。
       經由實證結果發現我國承銷商在訂價時會參考加權平均圈購價格與圈購價格集中度所提供的資訊,而超額認購是較為次要的參考依據。相較於國外投資銀行,我國承銷商在訂價時並未大幅參考投資人圈購時所提供之資訊。承銷商在訂定發行價格時較為重視圈購數量較多的投資人所提供之資訊,並且機構投資人對承銷商而言具有較高的資訊內涵價值。超額認購是所有詢價圈購資訊中,對於IPO後股票報酬率最有預測能力的變數,代表我國承銷商在訂價時並未完全將超額認購所提供的資訊反映至發行價格上。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Under bookbuilding process, underwriters can use relevant information from investors to price the issue more accurately. Previous studies also found that underwriters extensively use the information contained in the book and partially adjusted issue price to private information collected during the IPO process. The purpose of this paper is to examine whether underwriters use the information content of investors’ bids in IPOs when setting the issue price and to investigate whether this information can predict aftermarket returns. This paper analyzes 66 IPO issues between early 2004 and late 2007. The results suggest that weighted average limit price and the concentration of limit price are related to the issue price, and the level of oversubscription is minor factor to price setting. In addition, large bidders and institutional investors’ bids have information advantage and can provide helpful information to underwriters. Moreover, Oversubscription can predict aftermarket returns, suggesting that underwriters might not use all the information available when setting the issue price.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 緒論 1
     第一節 研究動機與目的 1
     第二節 研究流程與架構 3
     第貳章 文獻探討 5
     第一節 詢價圈購制度之比較 5
     第二節 資訊取得對訂定承銷價格之影響 7
     第三節 資訊內涵差異對訂價之影響 10
     第參章 研究方法 14
     第一節 資料來源與研究樣本 14
     第二節 研究方法 14
     第肆章 實證結果 22
     第一節 敘述統計分析 22
     第二節 詢價圈購資訊對訂價之影響 31
     第三節 詢價圈購資訊對IPO後股票報酬率之預測性 42
     第伍章 結論與建議 46
     第一節 研究結果 46
     第二節 研究限制 47
     第三節 研究建議 48
     參考文獻 50
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095357006en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 詢價圈購zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 承銷zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 訂價zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Bookbuildingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) IPOen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) pricingen_US
dc.title (題名) 詢價圈購之資訊內涵對承銷價格之影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. 劉玉珍、李怡宗、光心立、李淑瑜,「我國有價證券配售對象規範之合理性研究」,中華民國證券商業同業公會委託計畫,2007年11月zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. 劉玉珍、陳薇如,為何詢價圈購方式逐漸取代競價拍賣?,證券暨期貨月刊,2004年5月,16-31頁zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1. Agarwal, S., C. Liu and S. G. Rhee, 2008, “Investor Demand for IPOs and Aftermarket Performance: Evidence from Hong Kong Stock Market, ” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18, 176-190.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2. Aggarwal, R., N. R. Prabhala and M. Puri, 2002, “Institutional Allocation in Initial Public Offerings: Empirical Evidence,” Journal of Finance, 57, 1421-1442.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 3. Benveniste, L. M. and P. A. Spindt , 1989, “How Investment Bankers Determine the Offer Price and Allocation of New Issues,” Journal of Financial Economics , 24, 343-361.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 4. Benveniste, L. M. and W. J. Wilhelm, 1990, “A Comparative Analysis of IPO Proceeds under Alternative Regulatory Environments.” Journal of Financial Economics, 28, 173-208.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 5. Binay, M. M. and C. A. Pirinsky, 2003, “How Important is Relationship for Underwriters and Institutional Investors,” working paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 6. Bradley, D. J. and B. D. Jordan, 2002, “Public Information and Aftermarket Return in IPOs,” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 37, 595-616.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 7. Chemmanur, T. J. and G. Hu, 2007, “Institutional Trading, Allocation Sales, and Private Information in IPOs,” EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings Paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 8. Cornelli, F. and D. Goldreich, 2003, “Bookbuilding: How Informative is the Order Book?” Journal of Finance , 58, 1415-1444.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 9. Cornelli, F. and D. Goldreich, 2001, “Bookbuilding and Strategic Allocation, ” Journal of Finance , 56, 2337-2369.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 10. Derrien, F., 2005, “IPO Pricing in HOT Market Conditions: Who Leaves Money on the Table? ” Journal of Finance, 60, 487-521.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 11. Hanley, K. W, 1993, “The Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings and the Partial Adjustment Phenomenon, ” Journal of Financial Economics, 34, 231-250.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 12. Huyghebaert, N. and C. Van Hulle, 2006, “Bookbuilding and Share Pre-allocation in IPOs,” in Gregoriou, G. (ed) Initial Public Offerings: An International Perspective (Elsevier Press London, UK).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 13. Jenkinson, T. and H. Jones, 2004, “Bids and Allocations in European IPO Bookbuilding,” Journal of Finance, 59, 2309-2338.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 14. Ljungqvist, A. P., and W. J. Wilhelm, 2002, “IPO Allocations: Discriminatory or Discretionary? ” Journal of Financial Economics ,65, 167-201.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 15. Loughran, T. and J. Ritter, 2002, “Why Don’t Issuers Get Upset about Leaving Money on the Table in IPOs?” Review of Financial Studies, 15, 413-443.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 16. Rock, K., 1986, “Why New Issues are Underpriced? ” Journal of Financial Economics, 15, 187-212.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 17. Sherman, A. E. and S. Titman, 2002, “Building the IPO order Book: Underpricing and Participation Limits with Costly Information,” Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 3-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 18. Spatt, C. and S. Srivastava, 1991, “Preplay Communication, Participation Restrictions, and Efficiency in Initial Public Offerings,” Review of Financial Studies ,4, 709-726.zh_TW