Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 家庭作業完成時間與頻率對學習成就的影響之研究-TIMSS 2003台灣數學科資料的階層線性模式分析
The Effects of homework time and homework frequency on academic achievement: A hierarchical linear modeling analysis using the TIMSS 2003 mathematics data of Taiwan
作者 洪川富
Hung, Chuan Fu
貢獻者 邱美秀
Chiu, Mei Shiu
洪川富
Hung, Chuan Fu
關鍵詞 家庭作業完成時間
家庭作業頻率
階層線性模式
學習成就
homework time
homework frequency
Hierarchical Linear Modeling
academic achievement
日期 2007
上傳時間 14-Sep-2009 11:17:21 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以TIMSS 2003台灣數學科資料為資料來源,使用階層線性模式為統計分析方式,探討國小四年級及國中二年級,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率,對於學生數學學習成就的影響。研究結果顯示:在國小四年級,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與學生數學學習成就為負相關;教師指派數學家庭作業頻率與學生數學學習成就之間為正相關,但並不顯著。在國中二年級,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率,對學生數學學習成就皆有正向的影響。在國小四年級中,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率的交互作用,對學生數學學習成就為負相關,但不顯著。在國中二年級中,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率的交互作用,對學生數學學習成就為正相關,但不顯著。
The research was to explore the effects of mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency on mathematics achievement in the fourth and eighth grades, using TIMSS 2003 Taiwan mathematics data as the resources and Hierarchical Linear Modeling as the statistical analysis method. The results showed that in the fourth grades, mathematics homework time had a negative relationship with mathematics achievement while mathematics homework frequency had a positive, but non-significant, relationship with mathematics achievement. In the eighth grades, both mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency had positive effects on mathematics achievement. In the fourth grades, the interaction between mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency had negative, but non-significant, effects on mathematics achievement while in the eighth grades, the interaction between mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency had positive, but non-significant, effects on mathematics achievement.
參考文獻 李志強(1999)。教師行為、父母親管教態度與國小學童學習壓力之關係。台南師院學生學刊,20,1-36。
吳清山(1989)。國小高年級學生家庭作業現況之調查研究。台北市立師範學院學報,20,105-142。
何琦瑜(2005)。放學後的生活:補習。天下雜誌,335,31-35。
林天佑、李郁然(2002)。美英兩國家庭作業政策與規定。國教新知,48(4),1-7。
林尚俞(2004)。桃園縣國民小學家庭作業實施現況之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
林思宇(2006年3月16日)。我的同學都在補。聯合晚報,第5版。
林海清(2005)。學生課後學習面面觀。研習資訊,22(5),6-15。
林義男(1988)。國小學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及學業成就的關係。輔導學報,11,95-141。
邱皓政(2002)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例與解析。台北市:五南。
胡金枝(1994)。國小資優生的學習動機、批判思考與其國語科學業成就之關係。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。
徐嘉怡(2001)。花蓮縣國民小學家庭作業施行狀況之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。
高新建(1997)。階層線性模型的基本概念與模型。測驗統計簡訊,15,1-10。
高新建、吳幼吾(1997)。階層線性模型在內屬結構教育資料上的應用。教育研究資訊,5(2),31-50。
張玉茹(1996)。國民中學學生英語學習動機、英語學習策略與英語學習成就相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
張春桂(2004)。國小學童課後補習狀況與家長決策行為之探討-以台南市為例。國立台南大學教師在職進修社會科教學碩士班碩士論文,未出版,台南市。
張芳全(2006)。影響數學學習成就因素在結構方程式模型檢定:以2003年台灣國二生TIMSS資料為例。國立台北教育大學學報,19(2),163-196。
張芳全(2007)。台灣、美國及日本之國二學生家庭作業與數學學習成就關係比較。教育資料集刊,34,285-316.
張秋男(主編)(2005)。國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查2003。台北市:國立台灣師範大學科學教育中心。
張淑媛(2002)。高職學生人格特質、情緒智力與學習成就:以高雄市立海青工商為例。南華大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
黃雪萍(2001)。國小高年級學童參加校外數學補習之背後因素與對補習學習影響之研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東縣。
黃琪媚(2004)。國中生的父母親管教方式、制握信念、學習壓力與學習成就之研究。大葉大學教育專業發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
黃瑩君(譯)(1995)。Rosemond, J. K.(著)。家庭作業靠邊站。台北市:新苗。
新苗編譯小組(譯)(2001)。Rosemond, J. K.(著)。不愛做功課的小孩。台北市:新苗。
新苗編譯小組(譯)(2005)。Rosemond, J. K.(著)。如何誘導孩子做功課。台北市:新苗。
溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式:原理、方法與應用。台北市:雙葉。
劉明松、張韶霞(2001)。國小學童家庭結構及父母教養方式與學業成就關係之研究。樹德科技大學學報,3(1),61-77。
劉奕佩(2007)。家庭社經地位、父母參與、父母期望與國小六年級學生英語學習成就之相關研究。國立台北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
黎瓊麗(2004)。國小學童英語學習動機、學習策略與學習成就之相關性研究:以屏東地區國小為例。國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
劉寶(2003)。桃園縣國小高年級學童父母管教態度、成就動機與學習壓力相關之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
駱明慶(2005)。教師特質對學生學習成就的影響。國立台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。
魏禹綸(2006)。國小高年級學童科學學習動機、科學學習策略與科學學習成就之相關研究。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
蘇麗貞(2003)。不同導向教學方式對健康與體育學習成就之影響。國立屏東師範學院體育學系碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
Aksoy, Y., & Link, V. R. (2000). A panel analysis of student mathematics achievement in the U. S. in the 1990s: Does increasing the amount of time in learning activities affect mathematics achievement. Economics of Educational Review, 19, 261-277.
Bowen, N. K., & Bowen, G. L. (1998). The mediating role of educational meaning in the relationship between home academic culture and academic performance. Family Relations, 47, 45-51.
Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.
Burnett, P. C., & Fanshawe, J. P. (1997). Measuring school-related stressors in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 415-428.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
Cool, V., & Keith, T. Z. (1991). Testing a model of school learning: Direct and indirect effects on academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 28-44.
Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Cooper, H. (2001). The battle over homework (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 70-83.
Cooper, H., Robison, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62.
Cooper, H., & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143-153.
Corno, L. (1980). Individual and class level effects of parent-assisted instruction in classroom memory support strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 278-292.
Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educational Researcher, 25, 27-30.
Coulter, F. (1979). Homework: A neglected research area. British Educational Research Journal, 5, 21-33.
De Jong, R., Westerhof, K. J., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2000). Homework and student math achievement in junior high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 130-157.
Deslandes, R., Royer, E., Potvin, P., & Leclerc, D. (1999). Patterns of home and school partnership for general and special education students at the secondary level. Exceptional Children, 65, 496-506.
Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 162-173.
Farrow, S., Tymms, P., & Henderson, B. (1999). Homework and attainment in primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 323-341.
Fehrman, P. G., Keith, T. Z., & Reimers, T. Z. (1987). Home influence on school learning: Direct and indirect effects of parental involvement on high school grades. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 330-337.
Grolnick, W. S. (2003). The psychology of parental control: How well-meant parenting backfires. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harding, R. C. (1979). The relationship of teacher attitudes toward homework and the academic achievement of primary grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
Hendrix, V. L., Sederberg, C. H., & Miller, V. L. (1990). Correlates of commitment/alienation among high school seniors. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 129-135.
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker, J. M. T., Reed, R. P., DeJong, J. M., & Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 195-209.
Institute of Education Sciences (2007). Frequently asked questions about the assessment: What is the schedule for TIMSS 2007? Retrieved September 29, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/faq.asp?FAQType=9
Iversen, G. R. (1991). Contextual analysis. Newbury Part, CA: Sage.
Keith, T. H. (1982). Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large-sample path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 248-253.
Keith, T. Z. (1988). Using path analysis to test the importance of manipulable influences on school learning. School Psychology Review, 17, 637-643.
Keith, T. Z., & Benson, M. J. (1992). Effects of manipulable influences on high school grades across five ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 85-93.
Keith, T. Z., & Cool, V. A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7(3), 207-226.
Keith, T. Z., Diamond-Hallam, C., & Fine, J. G. (2004). Longitudinal effects of in-school and out-of-school homework on high school grades. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 187-211.
Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Troutman, G. C., Bickley, P. G., Trivette, P. S., & Singh, K. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. School Psychology Review, 22, 474-496.
Martin, M. O. (2005). TIMSS 2003 user guide for the international database. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 technical report (Eds.). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.
Mau, W. C., & Lynn, R. (2000). Gender differences in homework and test scores in mathematics, reading and science at tenth and twelfth grade. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 2, 119-125.
Muhlenbruck, L., Cooper, H., Nye, B., & Lindsay, J. J. (2000). Homework and achievement: Explaining the different strengths of relation at the elementary and secondary school levels. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 295-317.
Natriello, G., & McDill, E. L. (1986). Performance standards, student effort on homework, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 59, 18-31.
Paschal, R. A., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1984). The effects of homework on learning: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 97–104.
Peng, S. S., & Wright, D. (1994). Explanation of academic achievement of Asian American students. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 346-352.
Pezdek, K., Berry, T., & Renno, P. A. (2002). Children’s mathematics achievement: The role of parents’ perceptions and their involvement in homework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 771-777.
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis models (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling[computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323-332.
Smith, T. E. (1990). Time and academic achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 539-558.
Smith, T. E. (1992). Time use and change in academic achievement: A longitudinal follow-up. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 725-747.
Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-7.
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17, 372-388.
Trautwein, U., & Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement: Still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 115-145.
Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Schmitz, B., & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 26-50.
Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Students’ self-reported effort and time on homework in six school subjects: Between-students differences and within-student variation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 432-444.
Tymms, P. B., & Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1992). The relationship of homework to A-level results. Educational Research, 34, 3-10.
Vazsonyi, A. T., & Pickering, L. E. (2003). The importance of family and school domains in adolescent deviance: African American and Caucasian youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 115-128.
Warton, P. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155-165.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
95152012
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095152012
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 邱美秀zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chiu, Mei Shiuen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 洪川富zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hung, Chuan Fuen_US
dc.creator (作者) 洪川富zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hung, Chuan Fuen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 14-Sep-2009 11:17:21 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-Sep-2009 11:17:21 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 14-Sep-2009 11:17:21 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0095152012en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31679-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95152012zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以TIMSS 2003台灣數學科資料為資料來源,使用階層線性模式為統計分析方式,探討國小四年級及國中二年級,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率,對於學生數學學習成就的影響。研究結果顯示:在國小四年級,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與學生數學學習成就為負相關;教師指派數學家庭作業頻率與學生數學學習成就之間為正相關,但並不顯著。在國中二年級,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率,對學生數學學習成就皆有正向的影響。在國小四年級中,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率的交互作用,對學生數學學習成就為負相關,但不顯著。在國中二年級中,學生數學家庭作業完成時間與教師指派數學家庭作業頻率的交互作用,對學生數學學習成就為正相關,但不顯著。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The research was to explore the effects of mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency on mathematics achievement in the fourth and eighth grades, using TIMSS 2003 Taiwan mathematics data as the resources and Hierarchical Linear Modeling as the statistical analysis method. The results showed that in the fourth grades, mathematics homework time had a negative relationship with mathematics achievement while mathematics homework frequency had a positive, but non-significant, relationship with mathematics achievement. In the eighth grades, both mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency had positive effects on mathematics achievement. In the fourth grades, the interaction between mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency had negative, but non-significant, effects on mathematics achievement while in the eighth grades, the interaction between mathematics homework time and mathematics homework frequency had positive, but non-significant, effects on mathematics achievement.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 目錄
     
     第一章 緒論
     第一節 研究動機…………………………………………………1
     第二節 研究目的…………………………………………………8
     第三節 研究問題…………………………………………………8
     第四節 名詞釋義…………………………………………………10
     第五節 研究範圍與限制…………………………………………11
     
     第二章 文獻探討
     第一節 學生家庭作業完成時間與學生學習成就………………13
     第二節 家庭作業頻率與學生學習成就…………………………25
     第三節 學生家庭作業完成時間、教師指派家庭作業頻率與學生學習成就………………………………………………… 28
     
     第三章 研究設計與實施
     第一節 研究架構……………………………………………… 33
     第二節 研究對象……………………………………………… 35
     第三節 研究變項……………………………………………… 37
     第四節 資料處理……………………………………………… 40
     
     第四章 結果與討論
     第一節 回歸分析結果………………………………………… 53
     第二節 零模型的階層線性模式分析結果…………………… 56
     第三節 完整模型的階層線性模式分析結果………………… 59
     
     第五章 結論與建議
     第一節 研究結論 ………………………………………………71
     第二節 研究建議 ………………………………………………73
     
     參考文獻………………………………………………………………82
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     表次
     
     表2-1 家庭作業完成時間與學習成就相關研究統整……………… 23
     表3-1 研究對象人數分配…………………………………………… 37
     表4-1 國小四年級數學學習成就的回歸分析結果………………… 54
     表4-2 國中二年級數學學習成就的回歸分析結果………………… 55
     表4-3 國小四年級數學學習成就的零模型分析結果……………… 57
     表4-4 國中二年級數學學習成就的零模型分析結果……………… 58
     表4-5 國小四年級數學學習成就的完整模型分析結果(固定效果) …………………………………………………………… 60
     表4-6 國小四年級數學學習成就的完整模型分析結果(隨機效果)…………………………………………………………… 60
     表4-7 國中二年級數學學習成就的完整模型分析結果(固定效果)…………………………………………………………… 65
     表4-8 國中二年級數學學習成就的完整模型分析結果(隨機效果) …………………………………………………………… 65
     
     
     圖次
     
     圖3-1 研究架構 ………………………………………………………34
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095152012en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家庭作業完成時間zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 家庭作業頻率zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 階層線性模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學習成就zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) homework timeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) homework frequencyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Hierarchical Linear Modelingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) academic achievementen_US
dc.title (題名) 家庭作業完成時間與頻率對學習成就的影響之研究-TIMSS 2003台灣數學科資料的階層線性模式分析zh_TW
dc.title (題名) The Effects of homework time and homework frequency on academic achievement: A hierarchical linear modeling analysis using the TIMSS 2003 mathematics data of Taiwanen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李志強(1999)。教師行為、父母親管教態度與國小學童學習壓力之關係。台南師院學生學刊,20,1-36。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山(1989)。國小高年級學生家庭作業現況之調查研究。台北市立師範學院學報,20,105-142。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何琦瑜(2005)。放學後的生活:補習。天下雜誌,335,31-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林天佑、李郁然(2002)。美英兩國家庭作業政策與規定。國教新知,48(4),1-7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林尚俞(2004)。桃園縣國民小學家庭作業實施現況之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林思宇(2006年3月16日)。我的同學都在補。聯合晚報,第5版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林海清(2005)。學生課後學習面面觀。研習資訊,22(5),6-15。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林義男(1988)。國小學生家庭社經背景、父母參與及學業成就的關係。輔導學報,11,95-141。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱皓政(2002)。量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例與解析。台北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡金枝(1994)。國小資優生的學習動機、批判思考與其國語科學業成就之關係。國立台中師範學院初等教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台中市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐嘉怡(2001)。花蓮縣國民小學家庭作業施行狀況之研究。國立花蓮師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,花蓮縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高新建(1997)。階層線性模型的基本概念與模型。測驗統計簡訊,15,1-10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高新建、吳幼吾(1997)。階層線性模型在內屬結構教育資料上的應用。教育研究資訊,5(2),31-50。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張玉茹(1996)。國民中學學生英語學習動機、英語學習策略與英語學習成就相關之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張春桂(2004)。國小學童課後補習狀況與家長決策行為之探討-以台南市為例。國立台南大學教師在職進修社會科教學碩士班碩士論文,未出版,台南市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張芳全(2006)。影響數學學習成就因素在結構方程式模型檢定:以2003年台灣國二生TIMSS資料為例。國立台北教育大學學報,19(2),163-196。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張芳全(2007)。台灣、美國及日本之國二學生家庭作業與數學學習成就關係比較。教育資料集刊,34,285-316.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張秋男(主編)(2005)。國際數學與科學教育成就趨勢調查2003。台北市:國立台灣師範大學科學教育中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張淑媛(2002)。高職學生人格特質、情緒智力與學習成就:以高雄市立海青工商為例。南華大學管理研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃雪萍(2001)。國小高年級學童參加校外數學補習之背後因素與對補習學習影響之研究。國立台東大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台東縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃琪媚(2004)。國中生的父母親管教方式、制握信念、學習壓力與學習成就之研究。大葉大學教育專業發展研究所碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃瑩君(譯)(1995)。Rosemond, J. K.(著)。家庭作業靠邊站。台北市:新苗。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 新苗編譯小組(譯)(2001)。Rosemond, J. K.(著)。不愛做功課的小孩。台北市:新苗。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 新苗編譯小組(譯)(2005)。Rosemond, J. K.(著)。如何誘導孩子做功課。台北市:新苗。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式:原理、方法與應用。台北市:雙葉。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉明松、張韶霞(2001)。國小學童家庭結構及父母教養方式與學業成就關係之研究。樹德科技大學學報,3(1),61-77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉奕佩(2007)。家庭社經地位、父母參與、父母期望與國小六年級學生英語學習成就之相關研究。國立台北教育大學兒童英語教育學系碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黎瓊麗(2004)。國小學童英語學習動機、學習策略與學習成就之相關性研究:以屏東地區國小為例。國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉寶(2003)。桃園縣國小高年級學童父母管教態度、成就動機與學習壓力相關之研究。國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 駱明慶(2005)。教師特質對學生學習成就的影響。國立台灣大學經濟學研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 魏禹綸(2006)。國小高年級學童科學學習動機、科學學習策略與科學學習成就之相關研究。國立嘉義大學科學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蘇麗貞(2003)。不同導向教學方式對健康與體育學習成就之影響。國立屏東師範學院體育學系碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aksoy, Y., & Link, V. R. (2000). A panel analysis of student mathematics achievement in the U. S. in the 1990s: Does increasing the amount of time in learning activities affect mathematics achievement. Economics of Educational Review, 19, 261-277.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bowen, N. K., & Bowen, G. L. (1998). The mediating role of educational meaning in the relationship between home academic culture and academic performance. Family Relations, 47, 45-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burnett, P. C., & Fanshawe, J. P. (1997). Measuring school-related stressors in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 415-428.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cool, V., & Keith, T. Z. (1991). Testing a model of school learning: Direct and indirect effects on academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 28-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooper, H. (2001). The battle over homework (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 70-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooper, H., Robison, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooper, H., & Valentine, J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143-153.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Corno, L. (1980). Individual and class level effects of parent-assisted instruction in classroom memory support strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 278-292.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educational Researcher, 25, 27-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coulter, F. (1979). Homework: A neglected research area. British Educational Research Journal, 5, 21-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) De Jong, R., Westerhof, K. J., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2000). Homework and student math achievement in junior high schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 130-157.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Deslandes, R., Royer, E., Potvin, P., & Leclerc, D. (1999). Patterns of home and school partnership for general and special education students at the secondary level. Exceptional Children, 65, 496-506.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Elawar, M. C., & Corno, L. (1985). A factorial experiment in teachers’ written feedback on student homework: Changing teacher behavior a little rather than a lot. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 162-173.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Farrow, S., Tymms, P., & Henderson, B. (1999). Homework and attainment in primary schools. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 323-341.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fehrman, P. G., Keith, T. Z., & Reimers, T. Z. (1987). Home influence on school learning: Direct and indirect effects of parental involvement on high school grades. Journal of Educational Research, 80, 330-337.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grolnick, W. S. (2003). The psychology of parental control: How well-meant parenting backfires. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harding, R. C. (1979). The relationship of teacher attitudes toward homework and the academic achievement of primary grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hendrix, V. L., Sederberg, C. H., & Miller, V. L. (1990). Correlates of commitment/alienation among high school seniors. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 23, 129-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker, J. M. T., Reed, R. P., DeJong, J. M., & Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 195-209.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Institute of Education Sciences (2007). Frequently asked questions about the assessment: What is the schedule for TIMSS 2007? Retrieved September 29, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/timss/faq.asp?FAQType=9zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Iversen, G. R. (1991). Contextual analysis. Newbury Part, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keith, T. H. (1982). Time spent on homework and high school grades: A large-sample path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 248-253.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keith, T. Z. (1988). Using path analysis to test the importance of manipulable influences on school learning. School Psychology Review, 17, 637-643.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keith, T. Z., & Benson, M. J. (1992). Effects of manipulable influences on high school grades across five ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 85-93.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keith, T. Z., & Cool, V. A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7(3), 207-226.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keith, T. Z., Diamond-Hallam, C., & Fine, J. G. (2004). Longitudinal effects of in-school and out-of-school homework on high school grades. School Psychology Quarterly, 19, 187-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keith, T. Z., Keith, P. B., Troutman, G. C., Bickley, P. G., Trivette, P. S., & Singh, K. (1993). Does parental involvement affect eighth-grade student achievement? Structural analysis of national data. School Psychology Review, 22, 474-496.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, M. O. (2005). TIMSS 2003 user guide for the international database. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report: Findings from IEA’s trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 technical report (Eds.). Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center, Boston College.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mau, W. C., & Lynn, R. (2000). Gender differences in homework and test scores in mathematics, reading and science at tenth and twelfth grade. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 2, 119-125.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Muhlenbruck, L., Cooper, H., Nye, B., & Lindsay, J. J. (2000). Homework and achievement: Explaining the different strengths of relation at the elementary and secondary school levels. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 295-317.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Natriello, G., & McDill, E. L. (1986). Performance standards, student effort on homework, and academic achievement. Sociology of Education, 59, 18-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paschal, R. A., Weinstein, T., & Walberg, H. J. (1984). The effects of homework on learning: A quantitative synthesis. Journal of Educational Research, 78, 97–104.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peng, S. S., & Wright, D. (1994). Explanation of academic achievement of Asian American students. Journal of Educational Research, 87, 346-352.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pezdek, K., Berry, T., & Renno, P. A. (2002). Children’s mathematics achievement: The role of parents’ perceptions and their involvement in homework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 771-777.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis models (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling[computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323-332.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, T. E. (1990). Time and academic achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 19, 539-558.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, T. E. (1992). Time use and change in academic achievement: A longitudinal follow-up. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 725-747.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-7.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17, 372-388.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Trautwein, U., & Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement: Still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 115-145.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Schmitz, B., & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 26-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Students’ self-reported effort and time on homework in six school subjects: Between-students differences and within-student variation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 432-444.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tymms, P. B., & Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1992). The relationship of homework to A-level results. Educational Research, 34, 3-10.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vazsonyi, A. T., & Pickering, L. E. (2003). The importance of family and school domains in adolescent deviance: African American and Caucasian youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 115-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Warton, P. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155-165.zh_TW