Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 荀子哲學的反思:以人觀為核心的探討
Reflections on the philosophy of the Xunzi: focusing on human nature
作者 王靈康
Wang, Ling Kang
貢獻者 何信全
Ho, Hsin Chuan
王靈康
Wang, Ling Kang
關鍵詞 荀子




Xuznzi
xing
shan
sheng
tian
日期 2007
上傳時間 14-Sep-2009 11:56:45 (UTC+8)
摘要 本文嘗試重建荀子哲學的人觀,並以此為核心,反思荀子哲學的歷史定位、其道德規範之依歸、道德哲學之性質、道德理想在修養與教化上扮演的功能,以及反思荀子哲學中人與世界的關係。首先指出歷來對荀子人觀的詮釋局限於性惡論,如此的詮釋在文獻依據與理論需求上均有待補充。隨後嘗試說明其道德哲學除了追求正理平治的社會生活之外,更可能還包括人格之提昇;而此分別以「善」之兩重意義為代表。在道德修養中,「聖」所扮演的角色也有兩重;一方面是作為修養方向的最高理想,另一方面是以具體的歷史人物作為典範。最後,在天人關係上,本文提出人能夠認識的世界,是「天」在人之經驗中呈現的現象,人據以認識世界、利用資源所需的自然法則,也是累積長久的觀察之後以某種建構方式得到的。
參考文獻 一、《荀子》註釋版本:
王先謙(1842-1917)撰,沈嘯寰、王星賢點校,《荀子集解》。北京:中華書局,1988年。
北大哲學系荀子注釋組,《荀子新注》。北京:中華書局,1979年。
李滌生,《荀子集釋》。台北:台灣學生書局,1981年。
張覺,《荀子校注》。長沙:岳麓書社,2006年。
楊柳橋,《荀子詁譯》。濟南:齊魯書社,1985年。
楊倞(唐代),《荀子》。台北:台灣中華書局,1970年。
熊公哲,《荀子今註今譯》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1990年。
二、中文書籍:
久保愛(1759-1832),《荀子增註》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第四十三、四十四冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
王念孫(1744 -1832),《荀子雜誌》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十四冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
晁福林,〈論荀子的「天人之分」說〉,《管子學刊》,2001年第2期,頁13-18。
袁長瑞,〈對荀子「知天」與「不求知天」之辨的看法〉,《孔孟月刊》42卷12期,總504期,2004年8月,頁23-26。
張元碩,〈美國的儒學研究現況(2005年)〉,《儒教文化研究》(國際版),第六期,韓國成均館大學校,2006年2月,頁87-104。
張亨,〈荀子對人的認知及其問題¬〉,《國立臺灣大學文史哲學報》20期,1971年6月,頁175-217。
莊錦章(Kim-chong Chong)著,黃裕宜譯,〈荀子與四種人性論觀點〉,《國立政治大學哲學學報》11期,「國際荀子研究專號」,2003年12月,頁185-210。
郭沂,〈子思弟子孟軻非孟子說〉,收入劉大鈞主編,《元典哲蘊》,上海:上海古籍出版社,2004年,頁182-202。
傅偉勳,〈創造的詮釋學其及應用—中國哲學方法論建構試論之一〉,收入《從創造的詮釋學到大乘佛學》。台北:東大圖書公司,1991年。
馮耀明,〈荀子人性論新詮:附〈榮辱〉篇23字衍之糾謬〉,《國立政治大學哲學學報》14期,2005年7月,頁169-230。
黃進興,〈道統與治統之間:從明嘉靖九年(1530)孔廟改制談起〉,《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》,第六十一本,第四份(民國七十九年十二月),1991年12月,頁917-941。
廖名春,〈二十世紀後期大陸荀子文獻整理研究〉,《漢學研究集刊》第三期,「荀子研究專號」,2006年12月,頁79-152。
王建文,《戰國諸子的古聖王傳說及其思想史意義》。台北:國立台灣大學出版委員會,1987年。
趙吉惠,〈論荀子「天人之分」的理論意趨〉,《哲學研究》1985年第8期,頁63-70。
劉又銘,〈從「蘊謂」論荀子哲學潛在的性善觀〉,台北,政大文學院編印,《孔學與二十一世紀國際學術研討會論文集》,2001年。頁50-77。
―――〈荀子的哲學典範及其在後代的變遷轉移〉,《漢學研究集刊》第三期,「荀子研究專號」,2006年12月,頁33-54。
―――〈合中有分—荀子、董仲舒天人關係論新詮〉,《台北大學中文學報》第二期,台北大學中國語文學系,2007年3月,頁27-50。
蔣堅松,〈文本與文化—評諾布洛克英譯本《荀子》〉,《外語與外語教學》(大連外國語學院學報)1999年第一期,總第116期,頁40- 43。
蔡錦昌,〈細柔的「一」與粗硬的「一」―評德國漢學界的兩種荀子研究〉,《漢學研究》25卷第2期,2007年12月,頁347-364。
鄭宰相,〈韓國荀子研究評述〉,《漢學研究集刊》第三期,「荀子研究專號」,2006年12月,頁183-220。
龍宇純,〈荀卿子記餘〉,《中國文哲研究集刊》15期,1999年9月,頁199-262。
四、會議論文:
何淑靜,〈論荀子的「性善說」—並比較孟、荀「性善說」之異同〉,中央研究院中國文哲研究所,「理解、詮釋與儒家傳統」第二次小型研討會,2004年9月3日。
王國維(1877-1927),《靜庵文集》。瀋陽:遼寧教育出版社,1997年。
鄧小虎,〈現代性與荀子:道德自主的可能〉,「荀子研究的回顧與開創國際學術研討會」,國立雲林科技大學,2006年2月19日。
五、英文書籍:
Allinson, Robert E. ed., Understanding the Chinese Mind: The Philosophy Roots. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Bontekoe, Ronald. Dimensions of the Hermeneutic Circle. Atlantic High-lands, New Jersey: Humanities Press International, 1996.
Chan, Alan K. L. (陳金樑), ed., Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.
Chow, Kai-wing (周啟榮), On-cho Ng (伍安祖), and John B. Henderson, eds., Imagining Boundaries: Changing Confucian Doctrines, Texts, and Hermeneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.
Cua, Antonio S. (柯雄文) Dimensions of Moral Creativity: Paradigms, Principles, and Ideals. University Park and London: The Pennsyl-vania State University Press, 1978.
-------- Ethical Argumentation:A Study in Hsün Tzu’s Moral Epistemology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1985. 中譯:柯雄文著,賴顯邦譯,《倫理論辯—荀子道德認識論之研究》,台北,黎明,1990年。
-------- Moral Vision and Tradition: Essays in Chinese Ethics. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1998.
-------- Human Nature, Ritual, and History Studies in Xunzi and Chinese Philosophy. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005.
王應麟(1223-1296)撰,翁元圻(1751-1825)注,《困學紀聞》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1956年。
Dubs, Homer H. Hsüntze: Moulder of Ancient Confucianism. London: Arthur Probsthain, 1927.
-------- The Works of Hsüntze: Translation from the Chinese, with Notes. London: Arthur Probsthain, 1928 (reprint, Taipei: Ch’eng-wen Pub-lishing Company 成文出版社, 1973).
Eno, Robert. The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.
Fehl, Noah E. Li: Rites and Propriety in Literature and Life: A Perspective for a Cultural History of Ancient China. Hong Kong: Chinese Uni-versity of Hong Kong, 1971.
Frankena, William K. Ethics, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. New York : Continuum, 1989.
Geaney, Jane. On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.
Goldin, Paul R. Rituals of the Way: The Philosophy of Xunzi. Chicago: Open Court, 1999.
Graham, A. C. Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990. Originally pub-lished: Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies, 1986.
-------- Disputers of the Dao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1999.
石元康,《從中國文化到現代性:典範轉移?》。臺北:東大圖書公司,1998年。
Hagen, Kurtis. The Philosophy of Xunzi: A Reconstruction. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 2007.
Hansen, Chad. Language and Logic in Ancient China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1983.
-------- A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Hutton, Eric. Virtue and Reason in Xunzi. Doctoral Dissertation, Sanford University, 2001.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. and Van Norden, Bryan W. eds., Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2001.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. Confucian Moral Self Cultivation. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000.
Ivanhoe, Philip J., ed. Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture: Nivison and His Critics. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.
Kline III, T. C. and Philip J Ivanhoe, eds. Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000.
Kline III, T. C. Ethics and Tradition in the Xunzi. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, 1998.
Knoblock, John. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, Vols. 1-3. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988-1994.
伍振勳,《語言、社會與歷史意識—荀子思想探義》。新竹:國立清華大學中國文學系博士論文,2005年七月初稿,2006年二月修訂。
Lee, Janghee. (李漳熙) Xunzi and Early Chinese Naturalism: Xunzi`s Concept of Xin and His Ethical Theory, Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005.
Lenk, Hans., and Gregor Paul. eds., Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1993.
Machle, Edward J. Nature and Heaven in the Xunzi: A Study in the Tian Lun. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.
MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue : A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, Ind. : University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.
Mou, Bo. (牟博) Comparative Approaches to Chinese Philosophy. Burling-ton, VT.: Ashgate Press, 2003.
Munro, Donald J. The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1969.
Neville, Robert C. Boston Confucianism: Portable Tradition in the Late-modern World. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.
Nivison, David. The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.
Puett, Michael J. The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.
-------- To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-divinization in early China. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center for the Harvard-Yenching Institute, 2002.
朱維錚,《求索真文明》。上海,上海古籍出版社,1996年。
Russell, Bertrand. History of Western Philosophy. London/New York : Routledge, 2004. Originally published: London: George Allen & Unwin, 1946.
Sato, Masayuki. (佐藤將之) The Confucian Quest for Order: The Origin and Formation of the Political Thought of Xun Zi. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2003.
Schwartz, Benjamin I. The world of thought in ancient China. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985.
Shun, Kwong-loi. (信廣來) Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.
Slingerland, Edward G. Effortless Action: Wu-wei as a Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
Stalnaker, Aaron. Overcoming Our Evil: Human Nature and Spiritual Exercises in Xunzi and Augustine. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2006.
Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland. Utilitarian Confucianism: Che`n Liang`s Challenge to Chu Hsi. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1982,
Watson, Burton. Hsün Tzu: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.
Yearley, Lee H. Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.
六、英文論文:
朱曉海,《荀子之心性論》。香港:香港大學中文系博士論文,1993年。
Allinson, Robert E. “The Debate Between Mencius and Hsün-Tzu: Con-temporary Applications,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25:1, 1998, pp. 31-49.
Angle, Steve. “Review of Moral Vision and Tradition by A. S. Cua,” Journal of Asian Studies 60:4, 2001, pp. 1149-1150.
Bunnin, Nicholas. “Contemporary Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Analysis,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30:3&4 (Septem-ber/December 2003), pp. 341-356.
Cai, Degui.(蔡德貴)“American Confucianism,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32:1, 2005, pp. 123-138.
Campany, Robert. F. “Xunzi and the Durkheim as Theorists of Ritual Practice” in Discourse and Practice, edited by Reynolds, Frank. and David Tracy. Albany N. Y.: State University of New York Press, 1992, Ch. 7, pp. 197-231.
Chan, Wing-tsit. (陳榮捷) “Naturalistic Confucianism: Hsün Tzu,” in A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963, pp. 115-135. 中譯:陳榮捷編著,楊儒賓等合譯,《中國哲學文獻選編》,台北,巨流,1993年。
Chong, Kim-chong. (莊錦章) “Xunzi’s Systematic Critique of Mencius,” Philosophy East and West 53:2, 2003, pp. 215-233.
Creel, Herrlee G. “Chapter Seven: The Authoritarianism of Hsün Tzu,” Chinese Thought from Confucius to Mao Tse-tung. Chicago: Uni-versity of Chicago Press, 1953, pp. 115-134.
Cua, Antonio S. (柯雄文) “Morality and Paradigmatic Individuals,” American Philosophical Quarterly 6:4, 1969, pp. 324-329.
-------- “Reflections on Methodology in Chinese Philosophy,” International Philosophical Quarterly 11:2, 1971, pp. 236-247.
朱熹(1130-1200),《四書章句集注》。北京:中華書局,1983年。
-------- “The Conceptual Aspect of Hsün Tzu’s Philosophy of Human Nature,” Philosophy East and West 27:4, 1977, pp. 373-389.
-------- “The Quasi-empirical Aspect of Hsün Tzu’s Philosophy of Human Nature,” Philosophy East and West 28:1, 1978, pp. 3-19.
-------- “Dimensions of li (propriety): Reflections on an Aspect of Hsün Tzu’s Ethics,” Philosophy East and West 29:4, 1979, pp. 373-394.
-------- “Chinese Moral Vision, Responsive Agency, and Factual Beliefs,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7, 1980, pp. 3-26.
-------- “Morality and Human Nature,” Philosophy East and West, 32:3, 1982, pp. 279-294.
-------- “Ethical Uses of History in Early Confucianism: The Case of Hsün Tzu,” Philosophy East and West 35:2, 1985, 115-134. Also in Vir-tue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 39-68. 中譯:柯雄文著,王靈康譯,〈就荀子論早期儒家之歷史訴求在倫理學的應用〉,《哲學與文化》,15:4,1988年,頁18-33。
-------- “Hsün Tzu and the Unity of Virtues,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14:4, 1987, pp. 381-400. 中譯:柯雄文著,許漢譯,〈荀子論德之統一性〉,《哲學與文化》12:12,1985年,頁26-33。
-------- “Some Aspects of Ethical Argumentation: A Reply to Daniel Dahlstrom and John Marshall,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14:4, 1987, pp. 501-516.
-------- “The Status of Principles in Confucian Ethics," Journal of Chinese Philosophy 16:3, 1989, pp. 273-296.
-------- “The Concept of Li in Confucian Moral Theory," in Understanding the Chinese Mind: The Philosophy Roots, edited by Allison, Robert. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 209-235.
牟宗三,《荀學大略》。台北:中央文物供應社,1953年(此書收入《名家與荀子》。台北:台灣學生書局,1994年)。
-------- “The Problem of Conceptual Unity in Hsün Tzu and Li Kou’s Solution,” Philosophy East and West 39:2, 1989, pp. 115-134.
-------- “Review of Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, Vol. 1, Books 1-6, John Knoblock,” Philosophy East and West 41:2, 1991, pp. 215-227.
-------- “Competence, Concern, and the Role of Paradigmatic Individuals (“Chun-tzu”) in Moral Education,” Philosophy East and West, 42:2, 1992, pp. 215-227.
-------- “The Idea of Confucian Tradition,” Review of Metaphysics 45:4, 1992, pp. 803-840.中譯:柯雄文著、劉若韶、王靈康中譯〈儒家倫理傳統的性質〉,《哲學雜誌》17期,1996年8月,頁136-151。
-------- “The Possibility of Ethical Knowledge: Reflections on a Theme in the Hsün Tzu,” in Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Phi-losophy, edited by Hans Lenk and Gregor Paul. Albany: State Uni-versity of New York Press, 1993, pp. 159-184.
-------- “A Confucian Perspective on Self-Deception,” in Self and Decep-tion, edited by Roger Ames and Wimal Dissanayake. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996, pp. 177-199.
-------- “The Conceptual Framework of Confucian Ethical Thought,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 23, no. 2, 1996, pp. 153-174. Also in Antonio S. Cua, Moral Vision and Tradition: Essays in Chinese Ethics. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1998, Essay 13, “Basic Concepts of Confucian Ethics,” pp. 267-302. 中譯:柯雄文著,劉若韶、王靈康譯,〈儒家倫理思想的概念架構〉,《哲學雜誌》19期,1997年2月,頁142-160。
-------- “Reason and Principle in Chinese Philosophy,” in A Companion to World Philosophies, edited by Eliot Deutsch and Ron Bontekoe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997, pp. 210-213.
-------- “Xunzi,” in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 10. London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 818-820.
-------- “Problems of Chinese Moral Philosophy,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27:3, 2000, pp. 269-285.
―――《心體與性體》。台北:正中書局,1968年初版。
-------- “Hsün Tzu,” in Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd Edition, Vol. 3, edited by Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker. New York/London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 1294-1296.
-------- “On the Ethical Significance of the Ti-Yong Distinction,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29:2, 2002, 163-170.
-------- “The Ethical and the Religious Dimensions of Li (Rites),” The Review of Metaphysics 55: 3, 2002, pp. 471-519.
-------- “The Ethical Significance of Shame: Insights of Aristotle and Xunzi,” Philosophy East and West 53:2, 2003, pp. 147-202.
-------- “Xunzi,” in Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy, edited by A. S. Cua. New York and London: Routledge, 2003, pp. 821-829.
-------- “Xunzi,” in Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edition. New York: Macmillan, 2005.
Dahlstrom, Daniel. “Tao and Ethical Argumentation,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14:4, 1987, pp. 475-485.
Dubs, Homer H. “Mencius and Sün-dz on Human Nature,” Philosophy East and West 6:3, 1956, pp. 213-222.
Duyvendak, J. J. L., trans. “Hsün-tzŭ on the Rectification of Names,” T’oung Pao 23, 1924, pp. 221-254.
-------- “The Chronology of Hsüntzu,” T’oung Pao 26, 1929, pp. 73-95.
何志華、朱國藩、樊善標 編著,《《荀子》與先秦兩漢典籍重見資料彙編》。香港:香港中文大學出版社,2005年。
-------- “Notes on Dub’s Translation of Hsün-tzu,” T’oung Pao 29, 1932, pp. 1-42.
Eno, Robert. “Ritual as a Natural Art: The Role of T’ien in the Hsün Tzu,” in The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and Defense of Ritual Mastery. New York: State University of New York Press, 1990, pp. 131-170.
Fraser, Chris. “Zhuangzi, Xunzi and the Paradoxical Nature of Education,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33:4, 2006, pp. 529-542.
Graham, A. C. “The Background of Mencian Theory of Human Nature,” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 7 nos. 1 and 2, 1967.
-------- “Hsün Tzu’s Confucianism: Morality and Man’s Invention to Control His Nature,” in Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Chicago: Open Court, 1989, pp. 235-265.
Hagen, Kurtis. “A Critical Review of Ivanhoe on Xunzi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27:3, 2000, pp. 361-373.
-------- “The Concepts of Li and Lei in the Xunzi: Constructive Patterning of Categories,” International Philosophical Quarterly 41:2, 2001, pp. 183-197.
-------- “Xunzi and the Nature of Confucian Ritual,” Journal of the Ameri-can Academy of Religion 71: 2, 2003, pp. 371-403.
Hansen, Chad. “Ancient Chinese Theories of Language,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2, 1975, pp. 245-283.
-------- “Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy, and ‘Truth’,” Journal of Asian Studies 44:3, May 1985, pp. 491-519.
何信全,《晚清公羊學派的政治思想》。台北:經世書局,1984年。
-------- “Xunzi: Pragmatic Confucianism,” in A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 307-334.
Hutton, Eric. “Does Xunzi Have a Consistent Theory of Human Nature?” in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 220-236.
-------- “Xunzi: Introduction and Translation,” in Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy, edited by Philip J. Ivanhoe and Bryan W. Van Norden. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2001, pp. 247-295.
-------- “Moral Reasoning in Aristotle and Xunzi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29:3, 2002, pp. 355-384.
-------- “Character, Situationism, and Early Confucian Thought,” Philoso-phical Studies 127, 2006, pp. 37-58.
Ivanhoe, Philip J. “Thinking and Learning in Early Confucianism,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 17, 1990, pp. 473-493.
-------- “A Happy Symmetry: Xunzi’s Ethical Thought,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 59:2, 1991, pp. 309-322.
-------- “Human Nature and Moral Understanding in Xunzi,” International Philosophical Quarterly 34:2, 1994, pp. 167-175.
-------- “Xunzi,” in Confucian Moral Self Cultivation. Indianapolis/ Cam-bridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 29-42.
-------- “The Paradox of Wuwei?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34:2, 2007, pp, 276-287.
李杜,《中西哲學思想中的天道與上帝》。台北:聯經出版公司,1982年。
Kenzig, Stephen R. “Ritual versus Law in Hsün Tzu: a discussion,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 3, 1975, pp. 57-66.
Kline III, T. C. “Moral Agency and Motivation in the Xunzi,” in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 155- 175.
-------- “Moral Cultivation through Ritual Participation,” in Thinking Through Rituals: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Kevin Schilbrack. N.Y.: Routledge, 2004.
Kupperman, Joel J. “Morality as Psychological Constraint,” in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 89-102
Lau, D. C. (劉殿爵) “Theories of Human Nature in Mencius and Shyuntzyy,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 15, 1953, pp. 541-565. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapo-lis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000.
Legge, James, trans. “That the Nature is Evil,” in Chinese Classics: with a translation, critical and exegetical notes, prolegomena, and copi-ous indexes, Vol. II, Ch. II, Appendix I, Oxford: Clarendon press, 1893, pp. 79-88 (reprint, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1970, pp. 79-88).
Machle, Edward. “Hsün Tzŭ: A Revisionist View,” Iliff Review 32:3, 1975, pp. 19-31.
-------- “Hsün Tzu as a Religious Philosopher,” Philosophy East and West 26:4, 1976, pp. 443-461.
-------- “The Mind and the Shen-ming in the Xunzi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 19, 1992, pp. 361-386.
Makeham, John. “Nominalist theories of Naming in the Neo-Mohist Summa and Xun Zi," in Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought. Al-bany: State University of New York Press, 1994, pp. 51-64.
李明輝,《儒家視野下的政治思想》。台北:台灣大學出版中心,2005年。
Mei, Y. P. (梅貽寶) “Hsün Tzu on Terminology,” Philosophy East and West 1, 1951, pp. 51-66.
-------- “Hsün Tzu’s Theory of Education, with an English Translation of the Hsün Tzu, Chapter 1,” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 2:2, 1961, pp. 361-377.
-------- “Hsün Tzu’s Theory of Government, with an English Translation of the Hsün Tzu, Chapter 9,” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 8:1-2, 1970, pp. 36-83.
Munro, Donald J. “A Villain in the Xunzi,” in Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture—Nivison and His Critics, edited by Philip Ivanhoe. Chicago: Open Court, 1996, pp. 193-201.
Neville, Robert. “Ritual and Normative Culture,” in Normative Cultures. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995, pp. 163-95.
Nivison, David S. “Hsün Tzu and Chuang Tzu,” in Chinese Text and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham, edited by H. Rosemont. Chicago: Open Court, 1991, pp. 129-142. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/ Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 176-187.
-------- “Xunzi on Human Nature,” in The Ways of Confucianism: Investi-gations in Chinese Philosophy, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Chicago: Open Court, 1996, pp. 123-141.
Rosemont, Henry Jr. “State and Society in the Hsün Tzu: A Philosophical Commentary,” Monumenta Serica 29, 1970-1, pp. 38-78. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 1-38.
Scarpari, Maurizio. “The Debate on Human Nature in Early Confucian Literature,” Philosophy East and West 53:3, 2003, pp. 323-339.
Schofer, Jonathan W. “Virtue in Xunzi’s Thought,” Journal of Religious Ethics 21:1, 1993, pp. 117-136. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indian-apolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 69-88.
李明輝、陳瑋芬主編,《當代儒學與西方文化.哲學篇》。台北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所,2004年。
Schwartz, Benjamin I. “Hsün Tzu: The Defense of Faith,” The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985, pp. 290-320.
Shun, Kwong-loi. (信廣來) “Review of Ethical Argumentation by A. S. Cua,” Philosophy East and West 41:1, 1991, pp. 111-117.
Stalnaker, Aaron “Aspects of Xunzi’s Engagement with Early Daoism,” Philosophy East and West 53:1, 2003, pp. 87-129.
Van Norden, Bryan. “Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency,” International Philosophical Quarterly 32:2, no. 126, June 1992, pp. 161-184. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapo-lis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 103-134.
-------- “Hansen on Hsün Tzu," Journal of Chinese Philosophy 20:3, 1993, pp. 365-382.
Wong, David B. “Xunzi on Moral Motivation,” in Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture—Nivison and His Critics, edited by Philip Ivanhoe. Chicago: Open Court, 1996, pp. 202-223. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 135- 154.
Wong, Wai-ying. (黃慧英). “Confucian Ethics and Virtue Ethics,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28:3, 2001, pp. 285-300.
Yearley, Lee H. “Hsün Tzu on the Mind: His Attempted Synthesis of Confu-cianism and Taoism,” Journal of Asian Studies 39:3, 1980, pp. 465-480.

李明輝編,《儒家經典詮釋方法》。台北:喜瑪拉雅基金會發行,2003年。
李澤厚,《中國古代思想史論》。台北:漢京文化事業公司,1987年。
李衡眉,《先秦史論集》。濟南:齊魯書社,1999年。
汪中(1744-1794),《荀卿子通論》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十八冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
周紹賢,《荀子要義》。台北:台灣中華書局,1977年。
俞仁寰,《從類字透視荀子政治思想之體系》。台北:國立台灣大學法學院,1962年。
俞樾(1821-1907),《荀子平議》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十五冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
政治大學哲學系編,《國立政治大學哲學學報》第十一期,「國際荀子研究專號」。台北:政治大學哲學系,2003年。
施忠連,《現代新儒學在美國》。瀋陽:遼寧大學出版社,1994年。
胡適,《中國古代哲學史》。台北:台灣商務印書館,台三版,1967年。(原為:上海:商務印書館,1919年。)
韋政通,《荀子與古代哲學》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1992年。(初版1966年。)
―――《儒家與現代中國》。台北:東大圖書公司,1984年。
唐君毅,《中國哲學原論.導論篇》。台北:台灣學生書局,1984年。
―――《中國哲學原論.原性篇》。台北:台灣學生書局,1984年。
―――《中國哲學原論.原道篇.卷一》。台北:台灣學生書局,1986年。
唐迪風,《孟子大義》。台北:台灣學生書局,1974年景印。(初次付梓於1931年。)
夏甄陶,《論荀子的哲學思想》。上海:人民出版社,1979年。
徐平章,《荀子與兩漢哲學》。台北:文津出版社,1988年。
徐復觀,《中國人性論史.先秦篇》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1969年。
馬采、陳云合編,《世界哲學史年表》。北京:中國社會科學出版社,1992年。
馬積高,《荀學源流》。上海:上海古籍出版社,2000年。
張立文主編,《天》。台北:七略出版社,1996年。
―――《道》。北京:中國人民大學出版社,1989年。
張西堂,《荀子真偽考》。台北:明文書局,1994年。
張亨,《荀子假借字譜》。台北:國立台灣大學文學院,1963年。
梁啟超,《中國先秦思想》。台北:啟明書局,1961年。
―――《儒家哲學》。台北:台灣中華書局,1969年。
梁漱溟,《中國文化要義》。台北:正中書局,1962年。
荻生徂徠(物雙松)(1768-1830),《讀荀子》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第四十一冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
郭沂,《郭店竹簡與先秦學術思想》。上海:上海教育出版社,2002年。
陳大齊,《孟子性善說與荀子性惡說的比較研究》。台北:中央文物供應社,1953年
―――《孟子待解錄》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1980年
―――《荀子學說》。台北:中國文化大學出版部,1989年。(原為:台北:中華文化出版事業委員會,1954年。)
傅佩榮,《儒道天論發微》。台北:台灣學生書局,1985年。
傅斯年,《性命古訓辨證》。台北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所,1992年景印二版。(作者序撰於1938年。)
勞思光,《中國哲學史》。香港:香港中文大學崇基書院,1980年。
―――《書簡與雜記:思光少作集 (七)》。台北:時報文化,1987年。
朝川鼎(1781-1849),《校訂荀子箋釋》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第四十六冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
馮友蘭,《中國哲學史》。上海:商務印書館,1935年。
―――《中國哲學史新編》。北京:人民出版社,1998年。
黃俊傑編,《中國經典詮釋傳統(一):通論篇》。台北:喜瑪拉雅研究發展基金會,2002年。
楊伯峻,《孟子譯注》。香港:中華書局,1984年。
楊儒賓,《儒家身體觀》。台北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處,1996年。
葛兆光,《中國思想史》。上海:復旦大學出版社,2001年。
廖名春,《荀子新探》。台北:文津出版社,1994年。
熊公哲,《荀卿學案》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1986年。(作者序撰於1922年。)
熊賜履(1635-1709),《學統》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1967年。
趙士林,《荀子》。台北:東大圖書公司,1999年。
劉又銘,《大學思想論證》。台北:政治大學中國文學系博士論文,1992年。
劉大鈞,《元典哲蘊》。上海:上海古籍出版社,2004年。
劉台拱(1751-1805),《荀子補註》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十三冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
劉述先等,《當代新儒學論文集.外王篇》。台北:文津出版社,1991年。
劉師培(1884-1919),《荀子詞例舉要》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十六冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
―――《荀子補釋》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》第三十六冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
豬飼彥博(1761-1845),《荀子增註補遺》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第四十五冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
鄭力為,《儒學方向與人的尊嚴》。台北:文津出版社,1987年。
駱瑞鶴,《荀子補正》。武昌:武漢大學出版社,1997年。
鮑國順,《荀子學說析論》。台北:華正書局,1982年。
―――《儒學硏究集》。高雄:復文圖書出版社,2002年。
龍宇純,《荀子論集》。台北:台灣學生書局,1987年。
韓愈(768-824)著,馬其昶(1855-1930)校注、馬茂元(1918-1989)整理,《韓昌黎文集校注》。上海:上海古籍出版社,1987年。
魏徵(580-643),《荀子治要》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第二十九冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。
龐樸,《帛書五行篇研究》。濟南:齊魯書社,1980年。
三、中文論文:
王中江,〈荀學與儒家的學統和道統〉,《南昌大學學報》(人社版)33卷1期,2002年1月,頁1-8。
王靈康,〈英語世界的荀子研究〉,《國立政治大學哲學學報》11期,「國際荀子研究專號」,2003年12月,頁1-38。
―――〈隨時設教:試析荀子「法後王」的意義〉,台灣哲學學會,《台灣哲學研究》第四期,2004年3月,頁181-212。
伍振勳,〈荀子的「身、禮一體」觀―從「自然的身體」到「禮義的身體」〉,中央研究院中國文哲研究所,《中國文哲研究集刊》第19期,2001年9月,頁317-344。
―――〈從語言社會、面向解讀荀子的「化性起偽」說〉,《漢學研究》第26卷第1期,1998年3月,頁35-66。
朱維錚,〈晚清漢學:「排荀」與「尊荀」〉,收入《求索真文明》。上海,上海古籍出版社,1996年。
佐藤將之,〈二十世紀日本荀子研究之回顧〉,《國立政治大學哲學學報》11期,「國際荀子研究專號」,2003年12月,頁39-84。
―――〈漢學與哲學之邂逅:明治時期日本學者之《荀子》研究〉,《漢學研究集刊》第三期,「荀子研究專號」,2006年12月,頁153-182。
李澤厚,〈初讀郭店竹簡印象記要〉,《中國哲學》21輯,2000年1月,頁1-12。
姜廣輝,〈郭店楚簡與原典儒學〉,《中國哲學》21輯,2000年1月,頁263-273。
描述 博士
國立政治大學
哲學研究所
89154504
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0891545041
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 何信全zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Ho, Hsin Chuanen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王靈康zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Wang, Ling Kangen_US
dc.creator (作者) 王靈康zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Wang, Ling Kangen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 14-Sep-2009 11:56:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-Sep-2009 11:56:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 14-Sep-2009 11:56:45 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0891545041en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31725-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 哲學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 89154504zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本文嘗試重建荀子哲學的人觀,並以此為核心,反思荀子哲學的歷史定位、其道德規範之依歸、道德哲學之性質、道德理想在修養與教化上扮演的功能,以及反思荀子哲學中人與世界的關係。首先指出歷來對荀子人觀的詮釋局限於性惡論,如此的詮釋在文獻依據與理論需求上均有待補充。隨後嘗試說明其道德哲學除了追求正理平治的社會生活之外,更可能還包括人格之提昇;而此分別以「善」之兩重意義為代表。在道德修養中,「聖」所扮演的角色也有兩重;一方面是作為修養方向的最高理想,另一方面是以具體的歷史人物作為典範。最後,在天人關係上,本文提出人能夠認識的世界,是「天」在人之經驗中呈現的現象,人據以認識世界、利用資源所需的自然法則,也是累積長久的觀察之後以某種建構方式得到的。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論…………………………………………. 1
     第一節 荀子哲學的幾種不確定 3
     第二節 研究方法上的考量 7
     第三節 荀子研究中的詮釋循環現象 15
     第二章 性善論與性惡論………….…………...…… 19
     第一節 歷史上的荀子性惡論 19
     第二節 孟子與「生之謂性」 29
     第三節〈性惡篇〉未觸及孟子「性善論」 35
     第四節 向傳統告別 42
     第三章 嘗試重建荀子的人觀………………….....……… 45
     第一節 歷來對性惡論本身的批評 45
     第二節 對荀子人觀的補充 48
     第三節 仁、禮、義三者相持而長 71
     第四章 荀子的道德觀:「善」的提昇與轉化……………… 77
     第一節 歷來對荀子思想的倫理學定位 78
     第二節 從「正理平治」談性惡的理據 81
     第三節 以「聖」涵攝「正理平治」 85
     第五章 修養的目標:「聖」的兩重意義……………… 93
     第一節 「聖」與初學者的關係 94
     第二節 「聖」與「神明」的區分 99
     第三節 「具名之聖」與「無名之聖」 103
     第四節「無名之聖」的作用 110
     第六章 荀子的天人關係…….……………………………. 115
     第一節 歷來對「天」的詮釋 116
     第二節「天人合一」與「天人之分」 124
     第三節 荀子「天論」與「科學」 136
     第四節 對「知天」的嘗試性詮釋 141
     第七章 結論……………………………….……….……… 145
     參考文獻………………………………………….………… 151
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0891545041en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 荀子zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Xuznzien_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) xingen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) shanen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) shengen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) tianen_US
dc.title (題名) 荀子哲學的反思:以人觀為核心的探討zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Reflections on the philosophy of the Xunzi: focusing on human natureen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、《荀子》註釋版本:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王先謙(1842-1917)撰,沈嘯寰、王星賢點校,《荀子集解》。北京:中華書局,1988年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 北大哲學系荀子注釋組,《荀子新注》。北京:中華書局,1979年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李滌生,《荀子集釋》。台北:台灣學生書局,1981年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張覺,《荀子校注》。長沙:岳麓書社,2006年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊柳橋,《荀子詁譯》。濟南:齊魯書社,1985年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊倞(唐代),《荀子》。台北:台灣中華書局,1970年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 熊公哲,《荀子今註今譯》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1990年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、中文書籍:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 久保愛(1759-1832),《荀子增註》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第四十三、四十四冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王念孫(1744 -1832),《荀子雜誌》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十四冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 晁福林,〈論荀子的「天人之分」說〉,《管子學刊》,2001年第2期,頁13-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 袁長瑞,〈對荀子「知天」與「不求知天」之辨的看法〉,《孔孟月刊》42卷12期,總504期,2004年8月,頁23-26。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張元碩,〈美國的儒學研究現況(2005年)〉,《儒教文化研究》(國際版),第六期,韓國成均館大學校,2006年2月,頁87-104。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張亨,〈荀子對人的認知及其問題¬〉,《國立臺灣大學文史哲學報》20期,1971年6月,頁175-217。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 莊錦章(Kim-chong Chong)著,黃裕宜譯,〈荀子與四種人性論觀點〉,《國立政治大學哲學學報》11期,「國際荀子研究專號」,2003年12月,頁185-210。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭沂,〈子思弟子孟軻非孟子說〉,收入劉大鈞主編,《元典哲蘊》,上海:上海古籍出版社,2004年,頁182-202。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 傅偉勳,〈創造的詮釋學其及應用—中國哲學方法論建構試論之一〉,收入《從創造的詮釋學到大乘佛學》。台北:東大圖書公司,1991年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馮耀明,〈荀子人性論新詮:附〈榮辱〉篇23字衍之糾謬〉,《國立政治大學哲學學報》14期,2005年7月,頁169-230。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃進興,〈道統與治統之間:從明嘉靖九年(1530)孔廟改制談起〉,《中央研究院歷史語言研究所集刊》,第六十一本,第四份(民國七十九年十二月),1991年12月,頁917-941。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 廖名春,〈二十世紀後期大陸荀子文獻整理研究〉,《漢學研究集刊》第三期,「荀子研究專號」,2006年12月,頁79-152。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王建文,《戰國諸子的古聖王傳說及其思想史意義》。台北:國立台灣大學出版委員會,1987年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 趙吉惠,〈論荀子「天人之分」的理論意趨〉,《哲學研究》1985年第8期,頁63-70。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉又銘,〈從「蘊謂」論荀子哲學潛在的性善觀〉,台北,政大文學院編印,《孔學與二十一世紀國際學術研討會論文集》,2001年。頁50-77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――〈荀子的哲學典範及其在後代的變遷轉移〉,《漢學研究集刊》第三期,「荀子研究專號」,2006年12月,頁33-54。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――〈合中有分—荀子、董仲舒天人關係論新詮〉,《台北大學中文學報》第二期,台北大學中國語文學系,2007年3月,頁27-50。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔣堅松,〈文本與文化—評諾布洛克英譯本《荀子》〉,《外語與外語教學》(大連外國語學院學報)1999年第一期,總第116期,頁40- 43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡錦昌,〈細柔的「一」與粗硬的「一」―評德國漢學界的兩種荀子研究〉,《漢學研究》25卷第2期,2007年12月,頁347-364。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭宰相,〈韓國荀子研究評述〉,《漢學研究集刊》第三期,「荀子研究專號」,2006年12月,頁183-220。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 龍宇純,〈荀卿子記餘〉,《中國文哲研究集刊》15期,1999年9月,頁199-262。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 四、會議論文:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何淑靜,〈論荀子的「性善說」—並比較孟、荀「性善說」之異同〉,中央研究院中國文哲研究所,「理解、詮釋與儒家傳統」第二次小型研討會,2004年9月3日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王國維(1877-1927),《靜庵文集》。瀋陽:遼寧教育出版社,1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄧小虎,〈現代性與荀子:道德自主的可能〉,「荀子研究的回顧與開創國際學術研討會」,國立雲林科技大學,2006年2月19日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 五、英文書籍:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Allinson, Robert E. ed., Understanding the Chinese Mind: The Philosophy Roots. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bontekoe, Ronald. Dimensions of the Hermeneutic Circle. Atlantic High-lands, New Jersey: Humanities Press International, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chan, Alan K. L. (陳金樑), ed., Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chow, Kai-wing (周啟榮), On-cho Ng (伍安祖), and John B. Henderson, eds., Imagining Boundaries: Changing Confucian Doctrines, Texts, and Hermeneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cua, Antonio S. (柯雄文) Dimensions of Moral Creativity: Paradigms, Principles, and Ideals. University Park and London: The Pennsyl-vania State University Press, 1978.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- Ethical Argumentation:A Study in Hsün Tzu’s Moral Epistemology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1985. 中譯:柯雄文著,賴顯邦譯,《倫理論辯—荀子道德認識論之研究》,台北,黎明,1990年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- Moral Vision and Tradition: Essays in Chinese Ethics. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- Human Nature, Ritual, and History Studies in Xunzi and Chinese Philosophy. Washington: The Catholic University of America Press, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王應麟(1223-1296)撰,翁元圻(1751-1825)注,《困學紀聞》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1956年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dubs, Homer H. Hsüntze: Moulder of Ancient Confucianism. London: Arthur Probsthain, 1927.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- The Works of Hsüntze: Translation from the Chinese, with Notes. London: Arthur Probsthain, 1928 (reprint, Taipei: Ch’eng-wen Pub-lishing Company 成文出版社, 1973).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eno, Robert. The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and the Defense of Ritual Mastery. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fehl, Noah E. Li: Rites and Propriety in Literature and Life: A Perspective for a Cultural History of Ancient China. Hong Kong: Chinese Uni-versity of Hong Kong, 1971.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Frankena, William K. Ethics, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1973.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. New York : Continuum, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Geaney, Jane. On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldin, Paul R. Rituals of the Way: The Philosophy of Xunzi. Chicago: Open Court, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Graham, A. C. Studies in Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Literature. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990. Originally pub-lished: Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- Disputers of the Dao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 石元康,《從中國文化到現代性:典範轉移?》。臺北:東大圖書公司,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hagen, Kurtis. The Philosophy of Xunzi: A Reconstruction. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court, 2007.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hansen, Chad. Language and Logic in Ancient China. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hutton, Eric. Virtue and Reason in Xunzi. Doctoral Dissertation, Sanford University, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ivanhoe, Philip J. and Van Norden, Bryan W. eds., Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ivanhoe, Philip J. Confucian Moral Self Cultivation. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ivanhoe, Philip J., ed. Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture: Nivison and His Critics. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kline III, T. C. and Philip J Ivanhoe, eds. Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kline III, T. C. Ethics and Tradition in the Xunzi. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Philosophy, Stanford University, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Knoblock, John. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, Vols. 1-3. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1988-1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 伍振勳,《語言、社會與歷史意識—荀子思想探義》。新竹:國立清華大學中國文學系博士論文,2005年七月初稿,2006年二月修訂。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lee, Janghee. (李漳熙) Xunzi and Early Chinese Naturalism: Xunzi`s Concept of Xin and His Ethical Theory, Albany: State University of New York Press, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lenk, Hans., and Gregor Paul. eds., Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Machle, Edward J. Nature and Heaven in the Xunzi: A Study in the Tian Lun. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) MacIntyre, Alasdair. After Virtue : A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, Ind. : University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mou, Bo. (牟博) Comparative Approaches to Chinese Philosophy. Burling-ton, VT.: Ashgate Press, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Munro, Donald J. The Concept of Man in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1969.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Neville, Robert C. Boston Confucianism: Portable Tradition in the Late-modern World. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nivison, David. The Ways of Confucianism: Investigations in Chinese Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Puett, Michael J. The Ambivalence of Creation: Debates Concerning Innovation and Artifice in Early China. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- To Become a God: Cosmology, Sacrifice, and Self-divinization in early China. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Asia Center for the Harvard-Yenching Institute, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朱維錚,《求索真文明》。上海,上海古籍出版社,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Russell, Bertrand. History of Western Philosophy. London/New York : Routledge, 2004. Originally published: London: George Allen & Unwin, 1946.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sato, Masayuki. (佐藤將之) The Confucian Quest for Order: The Origin and Formation of the Political Thought of Xun Zi. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schwartz, Benjamin I. The world of thought in ancient China. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shun, Kwong-loi. (信廣來) Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Slingerland, Edward G. Effortless Action: Wu-wei as a Spiritual Ideal in Early China. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stalnaker, Aaron. Overcoming Our Evil: Human Nature and Spiritual Exercises in Xunzi and Augustine. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tillman, Hoyt Cleveland. Utilitarian Confucianism: Che`n Liang`s Challenge to Chu Hsi. Cambridge (Massachusetts) and London: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1982,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watson, Burton. Hsün Tzu: Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yearley, Lee H. Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 六、英文論文:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朱曉海,《荀子之心性論》。香港:香港大學中文系博士論文,1993年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Allinson, Robert E. “The Debate Between Mencius and Hsün-Tzu: Con-temporary Applications,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 25:1, 1998, pp. 31-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Angle, Steve. “Review of Moral Vision and Tradition by A. S. Cua,” Journal of Asian Studies 60:4, 2001, pp. 1149-1150.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bunnin, Nicholas. “Contemporary Chinese Philosophy and Philosophical Analysis,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30:3&4 (Septem-ber/December 2003), pp. 341-356.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cai, Degui.(蔡德貴)“American Confucianism,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 32:1, 2005, pp. 123-138.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Campany, Robert. F. “Xunzi and the Durkheim as Theorists of Ritual Practice” in Discourse and Practice, edited by Reynolds, Frank. and David Tracy. Albany N. Y.: State University of New York Press, 1992, Ch. 7, pp. 197-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chan, Wing-tsit. (陳榮捷) “Naturalistic Confucianism: Hsün Tzu,” in A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963, pp. 115-135. 中譯:陳榮捷編著,楊儒賓等合譯,《中國哲學文獻選編》,台北,巨流,1993年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chong, Kim-chong. (莊錦章) “Xunzi’s Systematic Critique of Mencius,” Philosophy East and West 53:2, 2003, pp. 215-233.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Creel, Herrlee G. “Chapter Seven: The Authoritarianism of Hsün Tzu,” Chinese Thought from Confucius to Mao Tse-tung. Chicago: Uni-versity of Chicago Press, 1953, pp. 115-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cua, Antonio S. (柯雄文) “Morality and Paradigmatic Individuals,” American Philosophical Quarterly 6:4, 1969, pp. 324-329.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Reflections on Methodology in Chinese Philosophy,” International Philosophical Quarterly 11:2, 1971, pp. 236-247.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朱熹(1130-1200),《四書章句集注》。北京:中華書局,1983年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Conceptual Aspect of Hsün Tzu’s Philosophy of Human Nature,” Philosophy East and West 27:4, 1977, pp. 373-389.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Quasi-empirical Aspect of Hsün Tzu’s Philosophy of Human Nature,” Philosophy East and West 28:1, 1978, pp. 3-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Dimensions of li (propriety): Reflections on an Aspect of Hsün Tzu’s Ethics,” Philosophy East and West 29:4, 1979, pp. 373-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Chinese Moral Vision, Responsive Agency, and Factual Beliefs,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 7, 1980, pp. 3-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Morality and Human Nature,” Philosophy East and West, 32:3, 1982, pp. 279-294.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Ethical Uses of History in Early Confucianism: The Case of Hsün Tzu,” Philosophy East and West 35:2, 1985, 115-134. Also in Vir-tue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 39-68. 中譯:柯雄文著,王靈康譯,〈就荀子論早期儒家之歷史訴求在倫理學的應用〉,《哲學與文化》,15:4,1988年,頁18-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Hsün Tzu and the Unity of Virtues,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14:4, 1987, pp. 381-400. 中譯:柯雄文著,許漢譯,〈荀子論德之統一性〉,《哲學與文化》12:12,1985年,頁26-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Some Aspects of Ethical Argumentation: A Reply to Daniel Dahlstrom and John Marshall,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14:4, 1987, pp. 501-516.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Status of Principles in Confucian Ethics," Journal of Chinese Philosophy 16:3, 1989, pp. 273-296.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Concept of Li in Confucian Moral Theory," in Understanding the Chinese Mind: The Philosophy Roots, edited by Allison, Robert. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 209-235.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 牟宗三,《荀學大略》。台北:中央文物供應社,1953年(此書收入《名家與荀子》。台北:台灣學生書局,1994年)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Problem of Conceptual Unity in Hsün Tzu and Li Kou’s Solution,” Philosophy East and West 39:2, 1989, pp. 115-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Review of Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, Vol. 1, Books 1-6, John Knoblock,” Philosophy East and West 41:2, 1991, pp. 215-227.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Competence, Concern, and the Role of Paradigmatic Individuals (“Chun-tzu”) in Moral Education,” Philosophy East and West, 42:2, 1992, pp. 215-227.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Idea of Confucian Tradition,” Review of Metaphysics 45:4, 1992, pp. 803-840.中譯:柯雄文著、劉若韶、王靈康中譯〈儒家倫理傳統的性質〉,《哲學雜誌》17期,1996年8月,頁136-151。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Possibility of Ethical Knowledge: Reflections on a Theme in the Hsün Tzu,” in Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Phi-losophy, edited by Hans Lenk and Gregor Paul. Albany: State Uni-versity of New York Press, 1993, pp. 159-184.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “A Confucian Perspective on Self-Deception,” in Self and Decep-tion, edited by Roger Ames and Wimal Dissanayake. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996, pp. 177-199.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Conceptual Framework of Confucian Ethical Thought,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 23, no. 2, 1996, pp. 153-174. Also in Antonio S. Cua, Moral Vision and Tradition: Essays in Chinese Ethics. Washington D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1998, Essay 13, “Basic Concepts of Confucian Ethics,” pp. 267-302. 中譯:柯雄文著,劉若韶、王靈康譯,〈儒家倫理思想的概念架構〉,《哲學雜誌》19期,1997年2月,頁142-160。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Reason and Principle in Chinese Philosophy,” in A Companion to World Philosophies, edited by Eliot Deutsch and Ron Bontekoe. Oxford: Blackwell, 1997, pp. 210-213.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Xunzi,” in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 10. London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 818-820.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Problems of Chinese Moral Philosophy,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27:3, 2000, pp. 269-285.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《心體與性體》。台北:正中書局,1968年初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Hsün Tzu,” in Encyclopedia of Ethics, 2nd Edition, Vol. 3, edited by Lawrence C. Becker and Charlotte B. Becker. New York/London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 1294-1296.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “On the Ethical Significance of the Ti-Yong Distinction,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29:2, 2002, 163-170.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Ethical and the Religious Dimensions of Li (Rites),” The Review of Metaphysics 55: 3, 2002, pp. 471-519.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Ethical Significance of Shame: Insights of Aristotle and Xunzi,” Philosophy East and West 53:2, 2003, pp. 147-202.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Xunzi,” in Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy, edited by A. S. Cua. New York and London: Routledge, 2003, pp. 821-829.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Xunzi,” in Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2nd edition. New York: Macmillan, 2005.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dahlstrom, Daniel. “Tao and Ethical Argumentation,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 14:4, 1987, pp. 475-485.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dubs, Homer H. “Mencius and Sün-dz on Human Nature,” Philosophy East and West 6:3, 1956, pp. 213-222.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duyvendak, J. J. L., trans. “Hsün-tzŭ on the Rectification of Names,” T’oung Pao 23, 1924, pp. 221-254.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Chronology of Hsüntzu,” T’oung Pao 26, 1929, pp. 73-95.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何志華、朱國藩、樊善標 編著,《《荀子》與先秦兩漢典籍重見資料彙編》。香港:香港中文大學出版社,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Notes on Dub’s Translation of Hsün-tzu,” T’oung Pao 29, 1932, pp. 1-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eno, Robert. “Ritual as a Natural Art: The Role of T’ien in the Hsün Tzu,” in The Confucian Creation of Heaven: Philosophy and Defense of Ritual Mastery. New York: State University of New York Press, 1990, pp. 131-170.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fraser, Chris. “Zhuangzi, Xunzi and the Paradoxical Nature of Education,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 33:4, 2006, pp. 529-542.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Graham, A. C. “The Background of Mencian Theory of Human Nature,” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, New Series 7 nos. 1 and 2, 1967.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Hsün Tzu’s Confucianism: Morality and Man’s Invention to Control His Nature,” in Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. Chicago: Open Court, 1989, pp. 235-265.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hagen, Kurtis. “A Critical Review of Ivanhoe on Xunzi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27:3, 2000, pp. 361-373.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Concepts of Li and Lei in the Xunzi: Constructive Patterning of Categories,” International Philosophical Quarterly 41:2, 2001, pp. 183-197.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Xunzi and the Nature of Confucian Ritual,” Journal of the Ameri-can Academy of Religion 71: 2, 2003, pp. 371-403.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hansen, Chad. “Ancient Chinese Theories of Language,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 2, 1975, pp. 245-283.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Chinese Language, Chinese Philosophy, and ‘Truth’,” Journal of Asian Studies 44:3, May 1985, pp. 491-519.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何信全,《晚清公羊學派的政治思想》。台北:經世書局,1984年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Xunzi: Pragmatic Confucianism,” in A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992, pp. 307-334.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hutton, Eric. “Does Xunzi Have a Consistent Theory of Human Nature?” in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 220-236.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Xunzi: Introduction and Translation,” in Readings in Classical Chinese Philosophy, edited by Philip J. Ivanhoe and Bryan W. Van Norden. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2001, pp. 247-295.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Moral Reasoning in Aristotle and Xunzi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 29:3, 2002, pp. 355-384.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Character, Situationism, and Early Confucian Thought,” Philoso-phical Studies 127, 2006, pp. 37-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ivanhoe, Philip J. “Thinking and Learning in Early Confucianism,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 17, 1990, pp. 473-493.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “A Happy Symmetry: Xunzi’s Ethical Thought,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion 59:2, 1991, pp. 309-322.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Human Nature and Moral Understanding in Xunzi,” International Philosophical Quarterly 34:2, 1994, pp. 167-175.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Xunzi,” in Confucian Moral Self Cultivation. Indianapolis/ Cam-bridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 29-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Paradox of Wuwei?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 34:2, 2007, pp, 276-287.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李杜,《中西哲學思想中的天道與上帝》。台北:聯經出版公司,1982年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kenzig, Stephen R. “Ritual versus Law in Hsün Tzu: a discussion,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 3, 1975, pp. 57-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kline III, T. C. “Moral Agency and Motivation in the Xunzi,” in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 155- 175.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Moral Cultivation through Ritual Participation,” in Thinking Through Rituals: Philosophical Perspectives, edited by Kevin Schilbrack. N.Y.: Routledge, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kupperman, Joel J. “Morality as Psychological Constraint,” in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 89-102zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lau, D. C. (劉殿爵) “Theories of Human Nature in Mencius and Shyuntzyy,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 15, 1953, pp. 541-565. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapo-lis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Legge, James, trans. “That the Nature is Evil,” in Chinese Classics: with a translation, critical and exegetical notes, prolegomena, and copi-ous indexes, Vol. II, Ch. II, Appendix I, Oxford: Clarendon press, 1893, pp. 79-88 (reprint, Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1970, pp. 79-88).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Machle, Edward. “Hsün Tzŭ: A Revisionist View,” Iliff Review 32:3, 1975, pp. 19-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Hsün Tzu as a Religious Philosopher,” Philosophy East and West 26:4, 1976, pp. 443-461.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “The Mind and the Shen-ming in the Xunzi,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 19, 1992, pp. 361-386.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Makeham, John. “Nominalist theories of Naming in the Neo-Mohist Summa and Xun Zi," in Name and Actuality in Early Chinese Thought. Al-bany: State University of New York Press, 1994, pp. 51-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李明輝,《儒家視野下的政治思想》。台北:台灣大學出版中心,2005年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mei, Y. P. (梅貽寶) “Hsün Tzu on Terminology,” Philosophy East and West 1, 1951, pp. 51-66.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Hsün Tzu’s Theory of Education, with an English Translation of the Hsün Tzu, Chapter 1,” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 2:2, 1961, pp. 361-377.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Hsün Tzu’s Theory of Government, with an English Translation of the Hsün Tzu, Chapter 9,” Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 8:1-2, 1970, pp. 36-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Munro, Donald J. “A Villain in the Xunzi,” in Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture—Nivison and His Critics, edited by Philip Ivanhoe. Chicago: Open Court, 1996, pp. 193-201.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Neville, Robert. “Ritual and Normative Culture,” in Normative Cultures. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995, pp. 163-95.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nivison, David S. “Hsün Tzu and Chuang Tzu,” in Chinese Text and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham, edited by H. Rosemont. Chicago: Open Court, 1991, pp. 129-142. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/ Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 176-187.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Xunzi on Human Nature,” in The Ways of Confucianism: Investi-gations in Chinese Philosophy, edited by Bryan W. Van Norden. Chicago: Open Court, 1996, pp. 123-141.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rosemont, Henry Jr. “State and Society in the Hsün Tzu: A Philosophical Commentary,” Monumenta Serica 29, 1970-1, pp. 38-78. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 1-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scarpari, Maurizio. “The Debate on Human Nature in Early Confucian Literature,” Philosophy East and West 53:3, 2003, pp. 323-339.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schofer, Jonathan W. “Virtue in Xunzi’s Thought,” Journal of Religious Ethics 21:1, 1993, pp. 117-136. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indian-apolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 69-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李明輝、陳瑋芬主編,《當代儒學與西方文化.哲學篇》。台北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schwartz, Benjamin I. “Hsün Tzu: The Defense of Faith,” The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1985, pp. 290-320.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shun, Kwong-loi. (信廣來) “Review of Ethical Argumentation by A. S. Cua,” Philosophy East and West 41:1, 1991, pp. 111-117.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stalnaker, Aaron “Aspects of Xunzi’s Engagement with Early Daoism,” Philosophy East and West 53:1, 2003, pp. 87-129.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Van Norden, Bryan. “Mengzi and Xunzi: Two Views of Human Agency,” International Philosophical Quarterly 32:2, no. 126, June 1992, pp. 161-184. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapo-lis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 103-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -------- “Hansen on Hsün Tzu," Journal of Chinese Philosophy 20:3, 1993, pp. 365-382.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wong, David B. “Xunzi on Moral Motivation,” in Chinese Language, Thought, and Culture—Nivison and His Critics, edited by Philip Ivanhoe. Chicago: Open Court, 1996, pp. 202-223. Also in Virtue, Nature, and Moral Agency in the Xunzi, edited by T. C. Kline III and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett, 2000, pp. 135- 154.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wong, Wai-ying. (黃慧英). “Confucian Ethics and Virtue Ethics,” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 28:3, 2001, pp. 285-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yearley, Lee H. “Hsün Tzu on the Mind: His Attempted Synthesis of Confu-cianism and Taoism,” Journal of Asian Studies 39:3, 1980, pp. 465-480.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李明輝編,《儒家經典詮釋方法》。台北:喜瑪拉雅基金會發行,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李澤厚,《中國古代思想史論》。台北:漢京文化事業公司,1987年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李衡眉,《先秦史論集》。濟南:齊魯書社,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 汪中(1744-1794),《荀卿子通論》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十八冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周紹賢,《荀子要義》。台北:台灣中華書局,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 俞仁寰,《從類字透視荀子政治思想之體系》。台北:國立台灣大學法學院,1962年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 俞樾(1821-1907),《荀子平議》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十五冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 政治大學哲學系編,《國立政治大學哲學學報》第十一期,「國際荀子研究專號」。台北:政治大學哲學系,2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 施忠連,《現代新儒學在美國》。瀋陽:遼寧大學出版社,1994年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡適,《中國古代哲學史》。台北:台灣商務印書館,台三版,1967年。(原為:上海:商務印書館,1919年。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 韋政通,《荀子與古代哲學》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1992年。(初版1966年。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《儒家與現代中國》。台北:東大圖書公司,1984年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 唐君毅,《中國哲學原論.導論篇》。台北:台灣學生書局,1984年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《中國哲學原論.原性篇》。台北:台灣學生書局,1984年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《中國哲學原論.原道篇.卷一》。台北:台灣學生書局,1986年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 唐迪風,《孟子大義》。台北:台灣學生書局,1974年景印。(初次付梓於1931年。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 夏甄陶,《論荀子的哲學思想》。上海:人民出版社,1979年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐平章,《荀子與兩漢哲學》。台北:文津出版社,1988年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐復觀,《中國人性論史.先秦篇》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1969年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬采、陳云合編,《世界哲學史年表》。北京:中國社會科學出版社,1992年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬積高,《荀學源流》。上海:上海古籍出版社,2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張立文主編,《天》。台北:七略出版社,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《道》。北京:中國人民大學出版社,1989年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張西堂,《荀子真偽考》。台北:明文書局,1994年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張亨,《荀子假借字譜》。台北:國立台灣大學文學院,1963年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁啟超,《中國先秦思想》。台北:啟明書局,1961年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《儒家哲學》。台北:台灣中華書局,1969年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁漱溟,《中國文化要義》。台北:正中書局,1962年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 荻生徂徠(物雙松)(1768-1830),《讀荀子》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第四十一冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭沂,《郭店竹簡與先秦學術思想》。上海:上海教育出版社,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳大齊,《孟子性善說與荀子性惡說的比較研究》。台北:中央文物供應社,1953年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《孟子待解錄》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1980年zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《荀子學說》。台北:中國文化大學出版部,1989年。(原為:台北:中華文化出版事業委員會,1954年。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 傅佩榮,《儒道天論發微》。台北:台灣學生書局,1985年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 傅斯年,《性命古訓辨證》。台北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所,1992年景印二版。(作者序撰於1938年。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 勞思光,《中國哲學史》。香港:香港中文大學崇基書院,1980年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《書簡與雜記:思光少作集 (七)》。台北:時報文化,1987年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朝川鼎(1781-1849),《校訂荀子箋釋》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第四十六冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馮友蘭,《中國哲學史》。上海:商務印書館,1935年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《中國哲學史新編》。北京:人民出版社,1998年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃俊傑編,《中國經典詮釋傳統(一):通論篇》。台北:喜瑪拉雅研究發展基金會,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊伯峻,《孟子譯注》。香港:中華書局,1984年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊儒賓,《儒家身體觀》。台北:中央研究院中國文哲研究所籌備處,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葛兆光,《中國思想史》。上海:復旦大學出版社,2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 廖名春,《荀子新探》。台北:文津出版社,1994年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 熊公哲,《荀卿學案》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1986年。(作者序撰於1922年。)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 熊賜履(1635-1709),《學統》。台北:台灣商務印書館,1967年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 趙士林,《荀子》。台北:東大圖書公司,1999年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉又銘,《大學思想論證》。台北:政治大學中國文學系博士論文,1992年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉大鈞,《元典哲蘊》。上海:上海古籍出版社,2004年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉台拱(1751-1805),《荀子補註》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十三冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉述先等,《當代新儒學論文集.外王篇》。台北:文津出版社,1991年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉師培(1884-1919),《荀子詞例舉要》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第三十六冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《荀子補釋》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》第三十六冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 豬飼彥博(1761-1845),《荀子增註補遺》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第四十五冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭力為,《儒學方向與人的尊嚴》。台北:文津出版社,1987年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 駱瑞鶴,《荀子補正》。武昌:武漢大學出版社,1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鮑國順,《荀子學說析論》。台北:華正書局,1982年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――《儒學硏究集》。高雄:復文圖書出版社,2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 龍宇純,《荀子論集》。台北:台灣學生書局,1987年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 韓愈(768-824)著,馬其昶(1855-1930)校注、馬茂元(1918-1989)整理,《韓昌黎文集校注》。上海:上海古籍出版社,1987年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 魏徵(580-643),《荀子治要》,收入嚴靈峰編輯,《無求備齋荀子集成》,第二十九冊。台北:成文出版社印行,1977年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 龐樸,《帛書五行篇研究》。濟南:齊魯書社,1980年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、中文論文:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王中江,〈荀學與儒家的學統和道統〉,《南昌大學學報》(人社版)33卷1期,2002年1月,頁1-8。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王靈康,〈英語世界的荀子研究〉,《國立政治大學哲學學報》11期,「國際荀子研究專號」,2003年12月,頁1-38。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――〈隨時設教:試析荀子「法後王」的意義〉,台灣哲學學會,《台灣哲學研究》第四期,2004年3月,頁181-212。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 伍振勳,〈荀子的「身、禮一體」觀―從「自然的身體」到「禮義的身體」〉,中央研究院中國文哲研究所,《中國文哲研究集刊》第19期,2001年9月,頁317-344。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――〈從語言社會、面向解讀荀子的「化性起偽」說〉,《漢學研究》第26卷第1期,1998年3月,頁35-66。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 朱維錚,〈晚清漢學:「排荀」與「尊荀」〉,收入《求索真文明》。上海,上海古籍出版社,1996年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 佐藤將之,〈二十世紀日本荀子研究之回顧〉,《國立政治大學哲學學報》11期,「國際荀子研究專號」,2003年12月,頁39-84。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ―――〈漢學與哲學之邂逅:明治時期日本學者之《荀子》研究〉,《漢學研究集刊》第三期,「荀子研究專號」,2006年12月,頁153-182。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李澤厚,〈初讀郭店竹簡印象記要〉,《中國哲學》21輯,2000年1月,頁1-12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 姜廣輝,〈郭店楚簡與原典儒學〉,《中國哲學》21輯,2000年1月,頁263-273。zh_TW