1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Liberal Arts
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 羅爾斯公共理性理念研究
A Study on Rawls`s Idea of Public Reason
作者 王冠生
貢獻者 何信全<br>戴華
王冠生
關鍵詞 羅爾斯
政治自由主義
公共理性
公共證成
交疊共識
審議式民主
羅爾斯式審議理論
John Rawls
political liberalism
public reason
public justification
overlapping consensus
deliberative democracy
Rawlsian deliberative theory
日期 2007
上傳時間 14-Sep-2009 11:57:03 (UTC+8)
摘要 羅爾斯於一九九三年發表《政治自由主義》，試圖為多元社會的整合提供一套哲學基礎。羅爾斯認為價值的差異與分歧是當代社會的重要特徵，多元的宗教觀、哲學觀、道德觀、人生觀是一個既存的事實，然而合理的公民能夠形成「交疊共識」，支持一套政治性正義觀，作為規範社會基本結構的基礎。尤其在面對憲政核心爭議與基本正義問題時，合理的公民能夠擱置具爭議性的整全性學說，遵循公共理性的理念，根據同一套政治性正義觀所提供的政治價值與正義原則來解決爭議、凝聚共識、證成決策。不過，羅爾斯的公共理性論受到許多批評，其至少面臨「公共理性無法證成政治共識」、「公共理性不公平地排除整全性學說」、「公共理性是多種而非一種」、「公共理性將淪為膚淺的大眾理性」四種挑戰，此四種挑戰分別是對於公共理性之「完備性」、「公平性」、「單一性」、「公共性」的質疑。針對這些挑戰，羅爾斯對其理論進行了三項主要修正：第一，以「寬觀點公共理性」與「包含式公共理性」補充「排除式公共理性」。第二，公共理性的內容是由一整套「自由主義政治性正義觀之族系」所給定，「正義即公平」也只是諸多合理的政治性正義觀之一。第三，羅爾斯承認公共理性的侷限，然而在必要時，得以「基於公共理性的投票」做出決策。根據這些修正，筆者認為羅爾斯的公共理性論能夠回應「完備性」、「公平性」、「單一性」三方面的挑戰，但是仍無法完全解決「完備性」的問題。因此在本文中，筆者試圖以「寬觀點公共理性」與「廣泛的反思均衡」證成「羅爾斯式的審議理論」，以突破公共理性的限制。尤其是筆者認為，「羅爾斯式審議理論」具有「公共證成的審議模式」、「尊重民主文化」、「兼顧程序正義與實質正義」、「滿足『真誠要求』」、「強化公民意識」、「重視公共理由」等特質，體現了一種自由主義式的審議式民主理論。因此，當我們思索「多元社會的政治共識如何可能？」時，「羅爾斯式審議理論」是一項較合理的方案。
This dissertation intends to explore John Rawls’s idea of public reason. Public reason is the core conception of Rawls’s political liberalism. Its subject is the public good concerning questions of fundamental political justice. Rawls argues that, though value diversity is the fact of a modern democratic society, reasonable citizens will follow a political conception of justice endorsed by the overlapping consensus between different kinds of comprehensive doctrines in order to resolve the deep conflicts. Especially, when the problems about constitutional essentials and basic justice occur, reasonable citizens will abide by the idea of public reason to deal with the problems. The idea of public reason is helpful for us to justify political consensus in a pluralistic society. However, some philosophers challenge the idea of public reason. They criticize that the idea of public reason cannot deal with the hard issues such as abortion, euthanasia, and affirmative action. Faced with these criticisms, Rawls revises his theory in three aspects. First, he revises the exclusive view of public reason by the inclusive view of public reason and the wide view of public reason. Secondly, he argues that the content of public reason is given by a family of reasonable political conceptions of justice. Thirdly, he asserts that we can make a political decision by voting in accordance with the idea of public reason if it is necessary. But, these revisions seems cannot completely overcome the shortcoming of the theory of public reason. Therefore, I want to justify Rawlsian deliberative theory based on the wide view of public reason and the wide reflective equilibrium to overcome the shortcoming of the idea of public reason. Owing to Rawlsian deliberative theory can reconcile liberalism and deliberative democracy, strengthen our civic friendship, and urge us to value public reasons more, I think it is a more plausible theory to justify political consensus in a modern pluralistic society.
參考文獻 Alejandro, Roberto
－－(1998) The Limits of Rawlsian Justice. Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins University Press.
Audard, Catherine
－－(1995)“The Idea of "Free Public Reason",”Ratio Juris 8(1),pp.15-29.
Audi ,Robert & Wolterstorff, Nicholas
－－(1997) Religion in the Public Square. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Bohman, James
－－(1995)“Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism: Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflict,”Political Theory 23(2), pp.253-279.
－－(1996) Public Deliberation : Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
－－(1999)“Citizenship and Norms of Publicity: Wide Public Reason in Cosmopolitan Societies,”Political Theory 27(2) ,pp.176-202
－－(2003)“Deliberative Toleration,”Political Theory 31(6) ,pp.757-779.
Larmore, Charles E.
－－(1996) The Morals of Modernity. New York : Cambridge University Press.
－－(2003)“Pubic Reason,”in Samuel Freeman ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Macedo, Stephen
－－(1990) Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
－－(1990) “The Politics of Justification,”Political Theory 18(2), pp.280-304.
－－(1999) (ed.) Deliberative Politics : Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York : Oxford University Press.
－－(2000)“In Defense of Liberal Public Reason: Are Slavery and Abortion Hard Cases?,”in Robert P. George & Christopher Wolfe ed., Natural Law and Public Reason. Washington D.C.：Georgetown University Press.
－－(2000) Diversity and Distrust : Civic Education in A Multicultural Democracy. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
Mandle, Jon
－－(2003)“Reflexive Public Deliberation: Democracy and the Limits of Pluralism,”Philosophy and Social Criticism 29(1) ,pp.85-105.
－－(1999)“The Reasonable in Justice As Fairness,”Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29(1) , pp.75-107.
－－(2000) What`s Left of Liberalism? An Interpretation and Defense of Justice As
Fairness. Md. : Lexington Books.
Marneffe,Peter de
－－(1994)“Rawls`s Idea of Public Reason,”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75(3-4) ,pp.232-250.
Martin, Rex & Reidy, David A.
－－(2006) Rawls`s Law of Peoples : A Realistic Utopia?. Malden, Mass. : Blackwell Pub.
McCarthy, Thomas A
－－(1995)“Enlightenment and the Idea of Public Reason,”European Journal of Philosophy 3(3) ,pp.242-256.
Miller, David & Michael Walzer
Bohman, James & Rehg, William eds.
－－(1995) Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. New York : Oxford University Press.
Mouffe, Chantal
－－(1996)“Democracy, Power, and the ‘Political’ ,”in Seyla Benhabib ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Nozick, Robert
－－(1995) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford : Blackwell.
O’Neill, Onora
－－(1997)“Political Liberalism and Public Reason: A Critical Notice of John Rawls, "Political Liberalism",”Philosophical Review 106(3) ,pp. 411- 428.
Pogge, Thomas Winfried Menko
－－(1989) Realizing Rawls. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
－－(2007) John Rawls : His Life and Theory of Justice. New York : Oxford University Press.
－－(1997) Deliberative Democracy : Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
Quinn, Philip
－－(1997)“Political Liberalisms and Their Exclusions of the Religious,”in Paul J. Weithman ed., Religion and Contemporary Liberalism. Notre Dame, Ind. : University of Notre Dame Press.
Rawls, John
－－(1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
－－(1985)“Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 14, pp.223-51.
－－(1987)“The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus,”Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7, pp.1-25.
－－(1989)“The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus,”New York University Law Review 64, pp.233-65.
－－(1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
－－(1996) Political Liberalism（2nd ed.）. New York: Columbia University Press.
－－(1999) A Theory of Justice（2nd ed.）. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Brower, Bruce W
－－(1999) The Law of Peoples；with“The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
－－(1999) Collected Papers. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
－－(2000) Lectures On the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
－－(2001) Justice as Fairness : A Restatement. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
－－(2005) Political Liberalism（3nd ed. ）. New York: Columbia University Press.
－－(2007) Samuel Freeman ed., Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reidy, David A
－－(2000)“Rawls`s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough,”Res Publica 6(1) ,pp.49-72.
Richardson, Henry S
－－(1999) Development and Main Outlines of Rawls`s Theory of Justice. New York : Garland Pub.
－－(1994)“The Limits of Public Reason,”Journal of Philosophy 91(1) ,pp. 5-26.
－－(1999) The Two Principles and Their Justifications. New York : Garland Pub.
－－(1999) Opponents and Implications of A Theory of Justice. New York : Garland Pub.
Ridge,Michael
－－(1999)“Hobbesian Public Reason,”Ethics 108(3) ,pp.538-568.
Sandel,Michael. J.
－－(1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York : Cambridge University Press.
－－(1984)“Introduction,”in Michael. J. Sandel ed., Liberalism and its Critics. New York : New York University Press.
－－(1994)“Political liberalism,”Harvard Law Review 107 ,pp.1765-94.
－－(1996) Democracy`s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
－－(1998)“A Response to Rawls’ Political Liberalism,”in Michael. J. Sandel , Liberalism and the Limits of Justice（2nd ed.）. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.
Chambers, Simone
Scheffler, Samuel
－－(1994)“The Appeal of Political Liberalism,”Ethics 105 ,pp.4-22.
Schwartzman, Micah
－－(2004)“The Completeness of Public Reason,”Politics, Philosophy & Economics 3(2) ,pp.191-220.
Solum, Lawrence B
－－(1994)“Inclusive Public Reason,”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75(3-4) , pp.217-231.
－－(1998) “Constructing an Ideal of Public Reason,” in Fred D`Agostino and Gerald F. Gaus ed., Public Reason. Dartmouth : Ashgate, pp.343-376.
Sterba, James P
－－(1999)“Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values,”Social Theory and Practice 25(1) ,pp.1-28.
Stokes, Susan
－－(2004)“Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation,”The Journal of Political Philosophy 12(4), pp.389-410.
－－(1998)“Pathologies of Deliberation,”in Jon Elster ed., Deliberative Democracy. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Strike, Kenneth
－－(1994)“On the Construction of Public Speech: Pluralism and Public Reason,”Educational Theory 44(1) ,pp.1-26.
Sullivan, Michael
－－(2005) “An Assessment of John Rawls’s Theory of Public Reason,” Philosophia Christi 7(1) ,pp.61-86.
Talisse, Robert B
－－(2001) On Rawls : A Liberal Theory of Justice and Justification. Belmont, Calif. : Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Taylor, Charles
－－(1979) Hegel and Modern Society. New York : Cambridge University Press.
－－(1985)“What is Human Agency? ,”Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 1.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen,Joshua
－－(1989)“Cross-Purposes: the Liberal-Communitarian Debate,”in N. Rosenblum ed., Liberalism and the Moral Life.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
－－(1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
－－(1992)“The Politics of Recognition,”in Amy Gutmann ed., Multiculturalism and the "The Politics of Recognition". Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Waldron, Jeremy
－－(1993)“Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism,”in Jeremy Waldron ed., Liberal Rights : Collected Papers, 1981-1991. New York : Cambridge Universtiy Press.
Wall,Steven P.
－－(1996)“Public Justification and the Transparency Argument,”The Philosophical Quarterly 46(185) ,pp.501-507.
Weithman, Paul J.
－－(1999) Moral Psychology and Community. New York : Garland Pub.
－－(1999) Reasonable Pluralism. New York : Garland Pub.
－－(1996)“Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy,”in Seyla Benhabib ed., Democracy and Difference : Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
Westmoreland, Robert
－－(1999)“The Truth about Public Reason,”Law and Philosophy 18(3), pp. 271-296.
Williams, Andrew
－－(2000)“The Alleged Incompleteness of Public Reason,”Res Publica 6(2) ,pp. 199-211.
Young, Iris Marion
－－(1989)“Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship," Ethics 99,pp.250-274.
－－(1990) Justice and Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
－－(1996)“Communication and the Other：Beyond Deliberative Democracy,” in Seyla Benhabib ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
－－(1999)“Justice, Inclusion, and Deliberative Democracy,”in Stephen Macedo ed., Deliberative Politics. New York : Oxford University Press.
石元康
－－(1997)“Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,”in James Bohman, William Rehg ed., Deliberative Democracy : Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
－－(1989)《洛爾斯》，台北：東大。
－－(1995)《當代自由主義理論》，台北：聯經。
江宜樺
－－(2001)《自由民主的理路》，台北：聯經。
－－(2005)〈西方「政治」概念之分析〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第12期。
何信全
－－(1988)《海耶克自由理論研究》，台北：聯經。
－－(2003)〈多元社會交疊共識如何可能？－－羅爾斯對社會整合之證成〉，《國立政治大學哲學學報》，第5期。
李明輝（譯）
－－(2002)《康德歷史哲學論文集》，台北：聯經。
－－(1998)“Democracy and Liberty,”in Jon Elster ed., Deliberative Democracy. New York : Cambridge University Press.
李少軍、杜麗燕、張虹（譯）
－－(2003)《正義論》，台北：桂冠。
李國維、珂洛緹、汪慶華（譯）
－－(2005)《萬民法》，台北：聯經。
林火旺
－－(1995)〈政治自由主義與道德生活〉，收入錢永祥、戴華主編，《哲學與公共規範》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
－－(1995)〈政治自由主義可否建立一個政治社群？〉，收入陳秀容、江宜樺主編，《政治社群》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
－－(1998)《羅爾斯正義論》，台北：台灣書店。
－－(2004)〈公共理性的功能及其限制〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第八期。
－－(2005)〈審議民主與公民養成〉，《國立臺灣大學哲學論評》，第29期。
Cooke,Maeve
林淑芬（譯）
－－(2005)《民主的弔詭》，台北：巨流。
林朝成、沈力（譯）
－－(1990)《溝通與社會演化》，台北：結構群。
林遠澤
－－(2005)〈真理為何？－－從哈伯瑪斯真理共識理論的實用轉向論真理的規範性涵義〉，《歐美研究》，第35卷第2期。
姚大志（譯）
－－(2002)《作為公平的正義：正義新論》，台北：左岸。
陳宜中
－－(2001)〈羅爾斯與政治哲學的實際任務〉，《政治科學論叢》，第14期。
－－(2002)“Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy,”in Maurizio Passerin Dentreves ed., Democracy as Public Deliberation : New Perspectives. New York : Manchester University Press.
－－(2004)〈羅爾斯的國際正義論與戰爭的正當性〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第八期。
陳俊宇
－－(2006)《論Rawls的公共理性之理念：以Rawls與Habermas之對比所展開的三種詮釋探討該理念在Rawls理論中的位置》，政治大學政治系碩士論文。
陳馨強
－－(2007)《由羅爾斯的公共理性論自由民主社會中的墮胎問題》，台北大學法律系碩士論文。
曹衛東（譯）
－－(2002)《包容他者》，上海：上海人民出版社。
章國鋒（譯）
－－(2000)《哈貝馬斯傳》，上海市 : 東方出版中心。
曾國祥
D`Agostino, Fred
－－(2004)〈自由主義與政治的侷限〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第8期。
許漢
－－(2003) “Rawls`s Conception of International Toleration,” 《國立政治大學哲學學報》，第5期。
－－(2004)〈羅爾斯與全球正義中的人權問題〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期。
張福建
－－(1997)〈多元主義與合理的政治秩序：羅爾斯「政治自由主義」評釋〉，《政治科學論叢》，第8期。
－－(2004)〈政治言論自由與社會正義--羅爾斯的觀點〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期。
童世駿（譯）
－－(2003)《事實與格式》，台北：臺灣商務印書館。
楊詩諭
－－(1996) Free Public Reason : Making It Up as We Go. New York : Oxford University Press.
－－(2005)《論Rawls的公共理性》，政治大學哲學系碩士論文。
萬俊人（譯）
－－(2000)《政治自由主義》，南京：譯林。
萬俊人等（譯）
－－(2001)《自由主義與正義的局限》，南京：譯林。
蔡英文
－－(1997)〈多元與統一：多元主義與自由主義的一項政治議題〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，第9卷第3期。
－－(2003)〈追尋民主社會的穩定性：約翰．羅爾斯〉，《歷史月刊》，第191期。
錢永祥
－－(1995)〈社會整合與羅爾斯自由主義的政治性格〉，收入錢永祥、戴華主編，《哲學與公共規範》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
D`Agostino, Fred & Gaus, Gerald F eds.
－－(2001)《縱欲與虛無之上：現代情境裡的政治倫理》，台北：聯經。
－－(2003)〈羅爾斯論公共性：公共理性或公共論述〉，《哲學的傳承與創新：慶祝林正弘教授榮退學術研討會論文集》。
謝世民
－－(2003)〈後啟蒙的哲學計畫：羅爾斯的政治自由主義〉，《二十一世紀》，第75期。
－－(2004)〈羅爾斯與社會正義的場域〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期。
謝宗學、鄭惠文（譯）
－－(2006)《商議民主》，台北：智勝。
蕭旭東
－－(2005)《論Rawls的公共理性理念》，台北大學法律系碩士論文。
關啟文
－－(1998) Public Reason. Dartmouth : Ashgate.
－－(2001)〈桑德爾的公民共和主義與羅爾斯的政治自由主義〉，《社會理論學報》，第4卷第2期。
戴華
－－(1991)〈個人與社會正義：探討羅爾斯正義理論中的道德人〉，收入戴華、鄭曉時主編，《正義及其相關問題》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
－－(1995)〈羅爾斯論理性直覺主義：對「政治性正義觀」的一項後設研究〉，收入錢永祥、戴華主編，《哲學與公共規範》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。
－－(2004)〈羅爾斯論康德「定言令式程序」〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期。
顏厥安
－－(2004)〈公共理性與法律論理〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第8期。
蕭高彥
－－(2007)〈《聯邦論》中的憲政主義與人民主權〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第22期。
龔群
Davion, Victoria & Clark Wolf eds.
－－(2006)《羅爾斯政治哲學》，北京 : 商務印書館。
－－(2000) The Idea of A Political Liberalism: Essays on Rawls. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Dombrowski, Daniel A
－－(2001) Rawls and Religion : the Case for Political Liberalism. Albany, N.Y. : State University of New York Press.
Dreben, Buton
－－(2003) “On Rawls and Political Liberalism,” in Samuel Freeman ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Elster, Jon
－－(1995)“Strategic Uses of Argument,”in Kenneth J. Arrow ed., Barriers to Conflict Resolution. New York: Norton.
－－(1998) Deliberative Democracy. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Farrelly, Colin
－－(1999)“Public Reason, Neutrality and Civic Virtues,”Ratio Juris 12(1), pp.11-25.
Freeman, Samuel Richard
－－(2000)“Deliberative Democracy : A Sympathetic Comment,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 29(4), pp.371-418.
－－(2003) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. New York : Cambridge University Press.
－－(2007) Justice and the Social Contract : Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy. New York : Oxford University Press.
－－(2007) Rawls. New York : Routledge.
Frohock, Pred
－－(1997)“The Boundaries of Public Reason,” The American Political Science Review 91(4), pp.833-844.
－－(1999) Public Reason : Mediated Authority in the Liberal State. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.
Galston, William
－－(1991) Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. New York : Cambridge University Press.
－－(2002) Liberal Pluralism：The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Gaus, Gerald F
－－(1994)“Public Reason and the Rule of Law,”Nomos 36, pp.328-363.
－－(2003) Contemporary Theories of Liberalism : Public Reason as A Post-Enlightenment Project. London, Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE.
Gauthier, David
－－(1995)“Public Reason,”Social Philosophy and Policy 12(1) ,pp.19-42.
George, Robert P. & Wolfe, Christopher eds.
－－(2000) Natural Law and Public Reason. Washington, D.C. : Georgetown University Press.
Gray, John
－－(2000) Two Faces of Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity.
Greenawalt, Kent
－－(1994)“On Public Reason,”Chicago-Kent Law Review 69 ,pp.669-689.
Gutmann, Amy & Thompson, Dennis
－－(1990)“Moral Conflict and Political Consensus,”Ethics 101,pp.64-88.
－－(1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
－－(1997)“Deliberating about Bioethics,”Hastings Center Report 27(3) ,pp. 38-41.
－－(2000)“Why Deliberative Democracy is Different,”Social Philosophy and Policy 17(1) ,pp.161-180.
－－(2002)“Deliberative Democracy Beyond Process,”Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2) ,pp.153-174.
－－(2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.
Habermas, Jurgen
－－(1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston : Beacon Press.
－－(1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by Thomas MaCarthy. Cambridge, England : Polity Press.
－－(1987) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity : Twelve Lectures. Translated by Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, England : Polity Press.
－－(1994) “Citizenship and National Identity,”in Bart Van Steenberg ed., The Condition of Citizenship. London：Sage Publications.
－－(1996) Between Facts and Norms : Contributions to A Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
－－(1998) The Inclusion of the Other : Studies in Political Theory. Edited by Ciaran Cronin & Pablo De Greif. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
－－(2003) Truth and Justification. Translated and edited by Barbara Fultner. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.
Hayek, F. A.
－－(1960) The Constitution of Liberty. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Horton, John
－－(2003)“Rawls, Public Reason and the Limits of Liberal Justification ,”Contemporary Political Theory 2, pp.5-23.
Horton, John & Susan Mendus ed.
－－(1999) Toleration, Identity and Difference. New York: St.Martin`s Press.
Ivison, Duncan
－－(1997)“The Secret History of Public Reason: Hobbes to Rawls,”History of Political Thought 18(1) ,pp.125-147.
Kant, Immanuel
－－(1996) Practical Philosophy : Selections. Translated and edited by Mary J. Gregor. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Kukathas, Chandran
－－(1990) Rawls` A Theory of Justice and Its Critics. Cambridge UK : Polity Press.
－－(2003) John Rawls : Critical Assessments of Leading Political Philosophers. New York : Routledge.
Kymlicka, Will
－－(1989) Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
－－(1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
－－(1995) (ed.) The Rights of Minority Cultures, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
－－(1997) States, Nations and Cultures. Assen: Van Gorcum.
－－(1998) Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ethnocultural Relations in Canada. Toronto : Oxford University Press.
－－(2001) Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
－－(2002) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. New York : Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, Will and Norman,Wayne
－－(1995)“Return of the Citizen：A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory,”in Ronald Beiner ed., Theorizing Citizenship. New York.：State University of New York Press.
－－(2000) Citizenship in Diverse Societies. New York : Oxford University Press.
描述 博士
國立政治大學
哲學研究所
90154501
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0901545011
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 何信全<br>戴華zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 王冠生zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 王冠生zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 14-Sep-2009 11:57:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-Sep-2009 11:57:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 14-Sep-2009 11:57:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0901545011en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31728-
dc.description (描述) 博士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 哲學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90154501zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 羅爾斯於一九九三年發表《政治自由主義》，試圖為多元社會的整合提供一套哲學基礎。羅爾斯認為價值的差異與分歧是當代社會的重要特徵，多元的宗教觀、哲學觀、道德觀、人生觀是一個既存的事實，然而合理的公民能夠形成「交疊共識」，支持一套政治性正義觀，作為規範社會基本結構的基礎。尤其在面對憲政核心爭議與基本正義問題時，合理的公民能夠擱置具爭議性的整全性學說，遵循公共理性的理念，根據同一套政治性正義觀所提供的政治價值與正義原則來解決爭議、凝聚共識、證成決策。不過，羅爾斯的公共理性論受到許多批評，其至少面臨「公共理性無法證成政治共識」、「公共理性不公平地排除整全性學說」、「公共理性是多種而非一種」、「公共理性將淪為膚淺的大眾理性」四種挑戰，此四種挑戰分別是對於公共理性之「完備性」、「公平性」、「單一性」、「公共性」的質疑。針對這些挑戰，羅爾斯對其理論進行了三項主要修正：第一，以「寬觀點公共理性」與「包含式公共理性」補充「排除式公共理性」。第二，公共理性的內容是由一整套「自由主義政治性正義觀之族系」所給定，「正義即公平」也只是諸多合理的政治性正義觀之一。第三，羅爾斯承認公共理性的侷限，然而在必要時，得以「基於公共理性的投票」做出決策。根據這些修正，筆者認為羅爾斯的公共理性論能夠回應「完備性」、「公平性」、「單一性」三方面的挑戰，但是仍無法完全解決「完備性」的問題。因此在本文中，筆者試圖以「寬觀點公共理性」與「廣泛的反思均衡」證成「羅爾斯式的審議理論」，以突破公共理性的限制。尤其是筆者認為，「羅爾斯式審議理論」具有「公共證成的審議模式」、「尊重民主文化」、「兼顧程序正義與實質正義」、「滿足『真誠要求』」、「強化公民意識」、「重視公共理由」等特質，體現了一種自由主義式的審議式民主理論。因此，當我們思索「多元社會的政治共識如何可能？」時，「羅爾斯式審議理論」是一項較合理的方案。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This dissertation intends to explore John Rawls’s idea of public reason. Public reason is the core conception of Rawls’s political liberalism. Its subject is the public good concerning questions of fundamental political justice. Rawls argues that, though value diversity is the fact of a modern democratic society, reasonable citizens will follow a political conception of justice endorsed by the overlapping consensus between different kinds of comprehensive doctrines in order to resolve the deep conflicts. Especially, when the problems about constitutional essentials and basic justice occur, reasonable citizens will abide by the idea of public reason to deal with the problems. The idea of public reason is helpful for us to justify political consensus in a pluralistic society. However, some philosophers challenge the idea of public reason. They criticize that the idea of public reason cannot deal with the hard issues such as abortion, euthanasia, and affirmative action. Faced with these criticisms, Rawls revises his theory in three aspects. First, he revises the exclusive view of public reason by the inclusive view of public reason and the wide view of public reason. Secondly, he argues that the content of public reason is given by a family of reasonable political conceptions of justice. Thirdly, he asserts that we can make a political decision by voting in accordance with the idea of public reason if it is necessary. But, these revisions seems cannot completely overcome the shortcoming of the theory of public reason. Therefore, I want to justify Rawlsian deliberative theory based on the wide view of public reason and the wide reflective equilibrium to overcome the shortcoming of the idea of public reason. Owing to Rawlsian deliberative theory can reconcile liberalism and deliberative democracy, strengthen our civic friendship, and urge us to value public reasons more, I think it is a more plausible theory to justify political consensus in a modern pluralistic society.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 緒論 ……………………………………………………………………………1
     第一節 研究動機 ……………………………………………………………1
     第二節 文獻探討 ……………………………………………………………4
     第三節 研究架構 …………………………………………………………11
     
     第一章 公共理性與公共證成…………………………………………………19
     第一節 公共理性的背景：政治自由主義的哲學計畫…………………20
     第二節 公共理性的起源：從康德到羅爾斯…………………………………32
     第三節 公共理性的理論內涵………………………………………………43
     第四節 公共理性與政治共識的證成………………………………………57
     
     第二章 公共理性的挑戰……………………………………………………69
     第一節 公共理性無法證成政治共識………………………………………69
     第二節 公共理性不公平地排除整全性學說………………………………78
     第三節 公共理性是多種而非一種…………………………………………87
     第四節 公共理性將淪為膚淺的大眾理性…………………………………96
     
     第三章 公共理性的修正與回應 …………………………………………105
     第一節 以「包含式公共理性」與「寬觀點公共理性」補充「排除式公共理性」 105
     第二節 以「自由主義政治性正義觀之族系」取代「單一政治性正義觀」115
     第三節 以「基於公共理性的投票」解決僵局 …………………………121
     第四節 對四種挑戰的回應 ……………………………………………127
     
     第四章 羅爾斯式審議理論的證成 ………………………………………143
     第一節 公共理性與公共審議 ……………………………………………144
     第二節 古德曼與湯普森論審議式民主的程序性與實質性原則 ………151
     第三節 柯亨論理想審議程序與審議原則 ………………………………161
     第四節 以「廣泛的反思均衡」與「寬觀點公共理性」證成羅爾斯式審議理論 …168
     
     第五章 羅爾斯與哈伯瑪斯之公共理性觀與審議式民主論的對比 ……179
     第一節 哈伯瑪斯論溝通行動理論、對話倫理學與審議式民主 ………180
     第二節 哈伯瑪斯對政治自由主義的質疑 ………………………………199
     第三節 羅爾斯論政治自由主義與溝通行動理論的差異 ………………209
     第四節 羅爾斯與哈伯瑪斯之公共理性觀與審議式民主論的三項對比 222
     
     結論 …………………………………………………………………………237
     
     參考文獻 ……………………………………………………………………247		zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0901545011en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 羅爾斯zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 政治自由主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共理性zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共證成zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 交疊共識zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 審議式民主zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 羅爾斯式審議理論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) John Rawlsen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) political liberalismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) public reasonen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) public justificationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) overlapping consensusen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) deliberative democracyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rawlsian deliberative theoryen_US
dc.title (題名) 羅爾斯公共理性理念研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Study on Rawls`s Idea of Public Reasonen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alejandro, Robertozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998) The Limits of Rawlsian Justice. Baltimore, Md. : Johns Hopkins University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Audard, Catherinezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)“The Idea of "Free Public Reason",”Ratio Juris 8(1),pp.15-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Audi ,Robert & Wolterstorff, Nicholaszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997) Religion in the Public Square. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bohman, Jameszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)“Public Reason and Cultural Pluralism: Political Liberalism and the Problem of Moral Conflict,”Political Theory 23(2), pp.253-279.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996) Public Deliberation : Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999)“Citizenship and Norms of Publicity: Wide Public Reason in Cosmopolitan Societies,”Political Theory 27(2) ,pp.176-202zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)“Deliberative Toleration,”Political Theory 31(6) ,pp.757-779.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Larmore, Charles E.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996) The Morals of Modernity. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)“Pubic Reason,”in Samuel Freeman ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Macedo, Stephenzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1990) Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue, and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1990) “The Politics of Justification,”Political Theory 18(2), pp.280-304.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) (ed.) Deliberative Politics : Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York : Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000)“In Defense of Liberal Public Reason: Are Slavery and Abortion Hard Cases?,”in Robert P. George & Christopher Wolfe ed., Natural Law and Public Reason. Washington D.C.：Georgetown University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000) Diversity and Distrust : Civic Education in A Multicultural Democracy. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mandle, Jonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)“Reflexive Public Deliberation: Democracy and the Limits of Pluralism,”Philosophy and Social Criticism 29(1) ,pp.85-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999)“The Reasonable in Justice As Fairness,”Canadian Journal of Philosophy 29(1) , pp.75-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000) What`s Left of Liberalism? An Interpretation and Defense of Justice Aszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fairness. Md. : Lexington Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marneffe,Peter dezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1994)“Rawls`s Idea of Public Reason,”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75(3-4) ,pp.232-250.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Martin, Rex & Reidy, David A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2006) Rawls`s Law of Peoples : A Realistic Utopia?. Malden, Mass. : Blackwell Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCarthy, Thomas Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)“Enlightenment and the Idea of Public Reason,”European Journal of Philosophy 3(3) ,pp.242-256.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miller, David & Michael Walzerzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bohman, James & Rehg, William eds.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995) Pluralism, Justice, and Equality. New York : Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mouffe, Chantalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996)“Democracy, Power, and the ‘Political’ ,”in Seyla Benhabib ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nozick, Robertzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Oxford : Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Neill, Onorazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997)“Political Liberalism and Public Reason: A Critical Notice of John Rawls, "Political Liberalism",”Philosophical Review 106(3) ,pp. 411- 428.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pogge, Thomas Winfried Menkozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1989) Realizing Rawls. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2007) John Rawls : His Life and Theory of Justice. New York : Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997) Deliberative Democracy : Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Quinn, Philipzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997)“Political Liberalisms and Their Exclusions of the Religious,”in Paul J. Weithman ed., Religion and Contemporary Liberalism. Notre Dame, Ind. : University of Notre Dame Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rawls, Johnzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1985)“Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 14, pp.223-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1987)“The Idea of an Overlapping Consensus,”Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 7, pp.1-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1989)“The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus,”New York University Law Review 64, pp.233-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996) Political Liberalism（2nd ed.）. New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) A Theory of Justice（2nd ed.）. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brower, Bruce Wzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) The Law of Peoples；with“The Idea of Public Reason Revisited”. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) Collected Papers. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000) Lectures On the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2001) Justice as Fairness : A Restatement. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2005) Political Liberalism（3nd ed. ）. New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2007) Samuel Freeman ed., Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reidy, David Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000)“Rawls`s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough,”Res Publica 6(1) ,pp.49-72.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Richardson, Henry Szh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) Development and Main Outlines of Rawls`s Theory of Justice. New York : Garland Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1994)“The Limits of Public Reason,”Journal of Philosophy 91(1) ,pp. 5-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) The Two Principles and Their Justifications. New York : Garland Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) Opponents and Implications of A Theory of Justice. New York : Garland Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ridge,Michaelzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999)“Hobbesian Public Reason,”Ethics 108(3) ,pp.538-568.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sandel,Michael. J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1984)“Introduction,”in Michael. J. Sandel ed., Liberalism and its Critics. New York : New York University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1994)“Political liberalism,”Harvard Law Review 107 ,pp.1765-94.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996) Democracy`s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass. : Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998)“A Response to Rawls’ Political Liberalism,”in Michael. J. Sandel , Liberalism and the Limits of Justice（2nd ed.）. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chambers, Simonezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scheffler, Samuelzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1994)“The Appeal of Political Liberalism,”Ethics 105 ,pp.4-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schwartzman, Micahzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)“The Completeness of Public Reason,”Politics, Philosophy & Economics 3(2) ,pp.191-220.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Solum, Lawrence Bzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1994)“Inclusive Public Reason,”Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75(3-4) , pp.217-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998) “Constructing an Ideal of Public Reason,” in Fred D`Agostino and Gerald F. Gaus ed., Public Reason. Dartmouth : Ashgate, pp.343-376.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sterba, James Pzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999)“Reconciling Public Reason and Religious Values,”Social Theory and Practice 25(1) ,pp.1-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stokes, Susanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)“Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation,”The Journal of Political Philosophy 12(4), pp.389-410.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998)“Pathologies of Deliberation,”in Jon Elster ed., Deliberative Democracy. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strike, Kennethzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1994)“On the Construction of Public Speech: Pluralism and Public Reason,”Educational Theory 44(1) ,pp.1-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sullivan, Michaelzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2005) “An Assessment of John Rawls’s Theory of Public Reason,” Philosophia Christi 7(1) ,pp.61-86.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Talisse, Robert Bzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2001) On Rawls : A Liberal Theory of Justice and Justification. Belmont, Calif. : Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, Charleszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1979) Hegel and Modern Society. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1985)“What is Human Agency? ,”Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 1.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen,Joshuazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1989)“Cross-Purposes: the Liberal-Communitarian Debate,”in N. Rosenblum ed., Liberalism and the Moral Life.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1992)“The Politics of Recognition,”in Amy Gutmann ed., Multiculturalism and the "The Politics of Recognition". Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waldron, Jeremyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1993)“Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism,”in Jeremy Waldron ed., Liberal Rights : Collected Papers, 1981-1991. New York : Cambridge Universtiy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wall,Steven P.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996)“Public Justification and the Transparency Argument,”The Philosophical Quarterly 46(185) ,pp.501-507.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weithman, Paul J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) Moral Psychology and Community. New York : Garland Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) Reasonable Pluralism. New York : Garland Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996)“Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy,”in Seyla Benhabib ed., Democracy and Difference : Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Westmoreland, Robertzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999)“The Truth about Public Reason,”Law and Philosophy 18(3), pp. 271-296.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Williams, Andrewzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000)“The Alleged Incompleteness of Public Reason,”Res Publica 6(2) ,pp. 199-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Young, Iris Marionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1989)“Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship," Ethics 99,pp.250-274.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1990) Justice and Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996)“Communication and the Other：Beyond Deliberative Democracy,” in Seyla Benhabib ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999)“Justice, Inclusion, and Deliberative Democracy,”in Stephen Macedo ed., Deliberative Politics. New York : Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 石元康zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997)“Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy,”in James Bohman, William Rehg ed., Deliberative Democracy : Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1989)《洛爾斯》，台北：東大。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)《當代自由主義理論》，台北：聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江宜樺zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2001)《自由民主的理路》，台北：聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2005)〈西方「政治」概念之分析〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第12期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何信全zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1988)《海耶克自由理論研究》，台北：聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)〈多元社會交疊共識如何可能？－－羅爾斯對社會整合之證成〉，《國立政治大學哲學學報》，第5期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李明輝（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2002)《康德歷史哲學論文集》，台北：聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998)“Democracy and Liberty,”in Jon Elster ed., Deliberative Democracy. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李少軍、杜麗燕、張虹（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)《正義論》，台北：桂冠。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李國維、珂洛緹、汪慶華（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2005)《萬民法》，台北：聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林火旺zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)〈政治自由主義與道德生活〉，收入錢永祥、戴華主編，《哲學與公共規範》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)〈政治自由主義可否建立一個政治社群？〉，收入陳秀容、江宜樺主編，《政治社群》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998)《羅爾斯正義論》，台北：台灣書店。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)〈公共理性的功能及其限制〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第八期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2005)〈審議民主與公民養成〉，《國立臺灣大學哲學論評》，第29期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cooke,Maevezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林淑芬（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2005)《民主的弔詭》，台北：巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林朝成、沈力（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1990)《溝通與社會演化》，台北：結構群。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林遠澤zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2005)〈真理為何？－－從哈伯瑪斯真理共識理論的實用轉向論真理的規範性涵義〉，《歐美研究》，第35卷第2期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 姚大志（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2002)《作為公平的正義：正義新論》，台北：左岸。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳宜中zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2001)〈羅爾斯與政治哲學的實際任務〉，《政治科學論叢》，第14期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2002)“Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy,”in Maurizio Passerin Dentreves ed., Democracy as Public Deliberation : New Perspectives. New York : Manchester University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)〈羅爾斯的國際正義論與戰爭的正當性〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第八期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳俊宇zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2006)《論Rawls的公共理性之理念：以Rawls與Habermas之對比所展開的三種詮釋探討該理念在Rawls理論中的位置》，政治大學政治系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳馨強zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2007)《由羅爾斯的公共理性論自由民主社會中的墮胎問題》，台北大學法律系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曹衛東（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2002)《包容他者》，上海：上海人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 章國鋒（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000)《哈貝馬斯傳》，上海市 : 東方出版中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曾國祥zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) D`Agostino, Fredzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)〈自由主義與政治的侷限〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第8期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許漢zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003) “Rawls`s Conception of International Toleration,” 《國立政治大學哲學學報》，第5期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)〈羅爾斯與全球正義中的人權問題〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張福建zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997)〈多元主義與合理的政治秩序：羅爾斯「政治自由主義」評釋〉，《政治科學論叢》，第8期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)〈政治言論自由與社會正義--羅爾斯的觀點〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 童世駿（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)《事實與格式》，台北：臺灣商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊詩諭zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996) Free Public Reason : Making It Up as We Go. New York : Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2005)《論Rawls的公共理性》，政治大學哲學系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 萬俊人（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000)《政治自由主義》，南京：譯林。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 萬俊人等（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2001)《自由主義與正義的局限》，南京：譯林。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡英文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997)〈多元與統一：多元主義與自由主義的一項政治議題〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，第9卷第3期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)〈追尋民主社會的穩定性：約翰．羅爾斯〉，《歷史月刊》，第191期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 錢永祥zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)〈社會整合與羅爾斯自由主義的政治性格〉，收入錢永祥、戴華主編，《哲學與公共規範》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) D`Agostino, Fred & Gaus, Gerald F eds.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2001)《縱欲與虛無之上：現代情境裡的政治倫理》，台北：聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)〈羅爾斯論公共性：公共理性或公共論述〉，《哲學的傳承與創新：慶祝林正弘教授榮退學術研討會論文集》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝世民zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)〈後啟蒙的哲學計畫：羅爾斯的政治自由主義〉，《二十一世紀》，第75期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)〈羅爾斯與社會正義的場域〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝宗學、鄭惠文（譯）zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2006)《商議民主》，台北：智勝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭旭東zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2005)《論Rawls的公共理性理念》，台北大學法律系碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 關啟文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998) Public Reason. Dartmouth : Ashgate.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2001)〈桑德爾的公民共和主義與羅爾斯的政治自由主義〉，《社會理論學報》，第4卷第2期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 戴華zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1991)〈個人與社會正義：探討羅爾斯正義理論中的道德人〉，收入戴華、鄭曉時主編，《正義及其相關問題》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)〈羅爾斯論理性直覺主義：對「政治性正義觀」的一項後設研究〉，收入錢永祥、戴華主編，《哲學與公共規範》，台北：中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)〈羅爾斯論康德「定言令式程序」〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第9期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顏厥安zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004)〈公共理性與法律論理〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第8期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭高彥zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2007)〈《聯邦論》中的憲政主義與人民主權〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，第22期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 龔群zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Davion, Victoria & Clark Wolf eds.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2006)《羅爾斯政治哲學》，北京 : 商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000) The Idea of A Political Liberalism: Essays on Rawls. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dombrowski, Daniel Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2001) Rawls and Religion : the Case for Political Liberalism. Albany, N.Y. : State University of New York Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dreben, Butonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003) “On Rawls and Political Liberalism,” in Samuel Freeman ed., The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Elster, Jonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)“Strategic Uses of Argument,”in Kenneth J. Arrow ed., Barriers to Conflict Resolution. New York: Norton.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998) Deliberative Democracy. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Farrelly, Colinzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999)“Public Reason, Neutrality and Civic Virtues,”Ratio Juris 12(1), pp.11-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Freeman, Samuel Richardzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000)“Deliberative Democracy : A Sympathetic Comment,”Philosophy and Public Affairs 29(4), pp.371-418.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003) The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2007) Justice and the Social Contract : Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy. New York : Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2007) Rawls. New York : Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Frohock, Predzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997)“The Boundaries of Public Reason,” The American Political Science Review 91(4), pp.833-844.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) Public Reason : Mediated Authority in the Liberal State. Ithaca : Cornell University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Galston, Williamzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1991) Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2002) Liberal Pluralism：The Implications of Value Pluralism for Political Theory and Practice. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gaus, Gerald Fzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1994)“Public Reason and the Rule of Law,”Nomos 36, pp.328-363.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003) Contemporary Theories of Liberalism : Public Reason as A Post-Enlightenment Project. London, Thousand Oaks, Calif. : SAGE.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gauthier, Davidzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)“Public Reason,”Social Philosophy and Policy 12(1) ,pp.19-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) George, Robert P. & Wolfe, Christopher eds.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000) Natural Law and Public Reason. Washington, D.C. : Georgetown University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gray, Johnzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000) Two Faces of Liberalism. Cambridge: Polity.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greenawalt, Kentzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1994)“On Public Reason,”Chicago-Kent Law Review 69 ,pp.669-689.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gutmann, Amy & Thompson, Denniszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1990)“Moral Conflict and Political Consensus,”Ethics 101,pp.64-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996) Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997)“Deliberating about Bioethics,”Hastings Center Report 27(3) ,pp. 38-41.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000)“Why Deliberative Democracy is Different,”Social Philosophy and Policy 17(1) ,pp.161-180.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2002)“Deliberative Democracy Beyond Process,”Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2) ,pp.153-174.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2004) Why Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Habermas, Jurgenzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1979) Communication and the Evolution of Society. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Boston : Beacon Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by Thomas MaCarthy. Cambridge, England : Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1987) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity : Twelve Lectures. Translated by Frederick Lawrence. Cambridge, England : Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1994) “Citizenship and National Identity,”in Bart Van Steenberg ed., The Condition of Citizenship. London：Sage Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996) Between Facts and Norms : Contributions to A Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998) The Inclusion of the Other : Studies in Political Theory. Edited by Ciaran Cronin & Pablo De Greif. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003) Truth and Justification. Translated and edited by Barbara Fultner. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hayek, F. A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1960) The Constitution of Liberty. London : Routledge & Kegan Paul.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Horton, Johnzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003)“Rawls, Public Reason and the Limits of Liberal Justification ,”Contemporary Political Theory 2, pp.5-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Horton, John & Susan Mendus ed.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1999) Toleration, Identity and Difference. New York: St.Martin`s Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ivison, Duncanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997)“The Secret History of Public Reason: Hobbes to Rawls,”History of Political Thought 18(1) ,pp.125-147.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kant, Immanuelzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1996) Practical Philosophy : Selections. Translated and edited by Mary J. Gregor. New York : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kukathas, Chandranzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1990) Rawls` A Theory of Justice and Its Critics. Cambridge UK : Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2003) John Rawls : Critical Assessments of Leading Political Philosophers. New York : Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kymlicka, Willzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1989) Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995) (ed.) The Rights of Minority Cultures, Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1997) States, Nations and Cultures. Assen: Van Gorcum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1998) Finding Our Way: Rethinking Ethnocultural Relations in Canada. Toronto : Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2001) Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2002) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. New York : Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kymlicka, Will and Norman,Waynezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(1995)“Return of the Citizen：A Survey of Recent Work on Citizenship Theory,”in Ronald Beiner ed., Theorizing Citizenship. New York.：State University of New York Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) －－(2000) Citizenship in Diverse Societies. New York : Oxford University Press.zh_TW