學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 台灣職場性別隔離的趨勢
Trends of Sex Segregation in the Taiwanese Workplace
作者 姜馨彥
Chiang, Hsin Yen
貢獻者 譚康榮
Tam,Tony
姜馨彥
Chiang, Hsin Yen
關鍵詞 工作層次性別隔離
邊際自由指標
標準化女性比例
job-level sex segregation
margin-free index
Standardized Percent Women
日期 2006
上傳時間 14-Sep-2009 13:22:57 (UTC+8)
摘要 本論文採用民國六十七年至九十一年人力資源調查五月份的資料,建構人力資源調查合併資料檔案,根據相異指數、以及Tam(2001b)的標準化女性比例,進行職業層次、產業層次、工作層次性別隔離的程度和樣貌的趨勢分析,並以三維立體圖形方法呈現結果。研究結果顯示,職業層次的性別隔離近乎整合且標準化女性比例的百分比座落在60%至70%之職業有逐漸增多的趨勢、產業層次的性別隔離也呈現整合而中性職業增加的趨勢、至於工作層次性別隔離程度則逐漸下降且也呈現出整合的趨勢變化,而工作層次性別隔離程度高過職業層次性別隔離程度。另採用民國六十九年與七十九年台閩地區戶口及住宅普查資料完整母體資料所建構的工作層次資料,以檢驗使用人力運用調查的樣本資料得出之工作層次資料的結果,證明後者的分析具有效度。而採用普查資料進行探究也發現,無論是在更細緻的職業層次(三分位職業代碼)和工作層次(三分位職業代碼與二分位行業代碼的工作代碼組合)、或者是在與人力資源調查相同的職業層次(二分位職業代碼)和工作層次(二分位職業代碼與二分位行業代碼的工作代碼組合)的分析層次下,採用相異指數和標準化女性比例的結果皆是性別隔離程度下降、也呈現出整合的趨勢變化,工作層次性別隔離程度也高過職業層次性別隔離程度,然其僅提供十年間的資訊,實為可惜之處。
This study uses data from 1978-2002 Manpower Utilization Survey (MUS) for analyzing, ultimately, job-level sex segregation in Taiwanese workplace. Taking into account the limitation of large amount of small-N job cells due to the relatively smaller sample sizes, the method of mid-point of interval estimation and 5-year aggregation is applied with its strength of consecutive data series: pooling data across 1978 to 1982 as estimation for year 1980, and so on, to construct 5-year aggregated MUS data. To view the job-level sex segregation pattern, job-level datasets are established by the “combination of occupation and industry codes”, from which there are units of analysis, job cells. And discarding small-N reliable sampled jobs in MUS is essential to avoid biased results for they contain extreme sex composition after comparing with those from population data of 1980 and 1990 Taiwanese Censuses. Findings indicate that the degree of occupational, industrial, and job-level sex segregation is somewhat increasing by Duncan and Duncan’s Dissimilarity Index, by which it is unable to measure the exact segregation degree because of its margin-dependent trait. However, by using Tam’s margin-free index: Standardized Percent Women, findings indicate that: (1) for occupational-level sex segregation, there is a trend of integration, and those occupations with 60%- 70% SPWOM shows a slight increase; (2) for industrial sex segregation, the trend almost remain the same, just that gender-neutral industries increase a bit, especially in recent years; (3) as for the degree of job-level sex segregation, it is declining, and there is a long-term trend of integration in Taiwanese workplace over the past 25 years. Therefore, job-level analysis does show what the past occupational and industrial analysis cannot present. And the findings from MUS are robust, based on the contrast analysis from population data of 1980 and 1990 Taiwanese Censuses; in addition, research outcomes from Census data also show integrated pattern in occupational and job-level sex segregation in that decade.
參考文獻 于若蓉
2002 〈人力資源調查合併資料—樣本流失問題初探〉。《調查研究》5:5-36。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。
王雅芬
1993 〈台灣地區職業結構性別差異與教育程度關聯性之研究〉。《勞工研究》113:20-31。
王麗容
1995 〈臺灣女性勞動參與和未回應的勞動政策—一個角色平等與角色變遷之檢視〉。海峽兩岸人口現象的分析國際學術研討會論文集,頁383-407。台北:台灣大學人口研究中心。
行政院主計處
2001 《中華民國八十九年臺灣地區人力資源調查統計年報》。台北市:行政院主計處。
行政院勞工委員會
1998 女性勞動情勢簡析http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/com/h0949.doc。
2000 《中華民國八十九年臺灣地區婦女就業平等狀況調查報告》。
Bielby, William T. and James N. Baron
1984 “A Woman’s Place is with Other Women: Sex Segregation within Organisations.” Pp. 27-55 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations and Remedies, edited by Reskin, Barbara F. National Academic Press: Washington.
1986 “Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 759-799.
Bishop, Y., Fienberg, S. and Holland, P.
1975 Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Blau, Francine, D.
1984 “Occupational Segregation and Labor Market Discrimination.” Pp. 117-143 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
1998 “Differences in Occupations and Earnings: Overview.” Pp. 123-140 in The Economisc of Women, Men and Work.
Blau, Francine, D. and Wallace E. Hendricks
1979 “Occupational Segregation by Sex: Trends and Prospects.” Journal of Human Resources 14(2): 197-210.
林忠正(Lin,Chung-cheng)
Blau, Peter Michael and Otis Dudley Duncan
1967 The American Occupation Structure. New York: Wiley.
Burris, Val and Amy Wharton
1982 “Sex Segregation in the U.S. Labor Force.” Review of Radical Political Economics 14(3): 43-56.
Chang, Mariko Lin
2000 “The Evolution of Sex Segregation Regimes.” American Journal of Sociology 105: 1658-1701.
Charles, Maria
1992 “Cross-National Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation.” American Sociological Review 57: 483-502.
1998 “Structure, Culture, and Sex Segregation in Europe.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 16: 89-116.
1988 〈Occupational Segregation between Sexes in Taiwan〉。《人文及社會集刊》2(1):155-175。
Charles, Maria and David B. Grusky
1995 “Models for Describing the Underlying Structure of Sex Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology 100(4): 931-971.
Corcoran Mary, Greg J. Duncan and Michael Ponza
1984 “Work experiences, Job Segregation, and Wages.” Pp. 171-191 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Coventry, Barbara Thomas
1999 “Do Men Leave Feminizing Occupations?” Social Science Journal 36(1): 47-71.
Duncan, Otis Dudley and Beverly Duncan
1955 “A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indexes.” American Sociological Review 20: 210-217.
England, Paula
1981 “Assessing Trends in Occupational Sex Segregation, 1900-1976.” Pp. 273-295 in Sociological Perspectives on Labor Market, edited by Ivar Berg. New York: Academic Press.
林季平、章英華
Epstein, Cynthia Puchs
1970 Woman’s Place: Options and Limits in Professional Careers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gibbs, J. P.
1965 “Occupational Differentiation of Negroes and Whites in the United States.” Social Forces 44: 159-65.
Griffiths, Martha W.
1976 “Can we still afford occupational sex segregation? Some remarks.” Pp. 7-14 in Women and the workplace: the implications of occupational segregation, edited by Martha Blaxall and Barbara Reagan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gross, Edward
1968 “Plus ça Chang…? The Sexual Structure of Occupation over Time.” Social Problem 16: 198-208.
Grusky, David B. and Maria Charles
1998 “The Past, Present, and Future of Sex Segregation Methodology.” Demography 35(4): 497-504.
2003 〈人力運用擬—追蹤調查資料庫的產生過程、應用現況、及未來發展〉。《調查研究》,13:39-69。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。
Hakim, Catherine
1981 “Job Segregation: Trends in the 1970s.” Employment Gazette 89(12): 521-529.
Hatt, Sue
1997 “Men’s Jobs, Women’s Jobs.” Pp. 65-82 in Gender, Work, and Labour Markets. Basingstoke, Hampshire, [England]: Macmillan Press; New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Jacobs, Jerry A.
1989 “Long-Term Trend in Occupational Segregation by Sex.” American Journal of Sociology 95(1): 160-173.
1999 “The Sex Segregation of Occupations.” Pp. 125-141 in Handbook of Gender and Work, edited by Gary N. Powell, Gary N. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Kessler-Harris, Alice
2001 In Pursuit of Equity: Women, Men, and the Quest for Economic
俞慧君
Citizenship in 20th Century America. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Joseph S.
1979 “An Empirical Study of the Functioning of the Labor Market in Taiwan.” Academia Economic Paper 8: 171-244.
Marini, Margaret Mooney and Mary C. Brinton
1984 “Sex Typing in Occupational Socializaton.” Pp. 192-232 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Merton, Robert K.
1957 Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, ILL: Free Press.
Mincer, James and Solomon W. Polachek
1974 “Family Investments in the Human Capital: Earnings of Women.” Journal of Political Economy 2: S76-S108.
NORC
1987 《女性工作平等權》。台北市:蔚理法律出版社。
1999 “Industrial Classifications Distributions in Appendix H” in General Social Surveys, 1972-1998: Cumulative Codebook, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincade
1974 “The Sex Labeling of Jobs.”in Women and Achievement: Social and Motivational Analysis, edited by Martha T. S. Mednick, Sandra S. Tangri, and Lois W. Hoffman. New York: Wiley.
Petersen, Trond and Morgan, Laurie A.
1995 “Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap.” American Journal of Sociology, 101(2): 329-365.
Phelps, Edmund S.
1972 “The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism.” American Economic Review 62: 4659-4661.
Piore, Michael J.
1971 “The Dual Labor Market: Theory and Implications.” Pp. 90-94. in Problems In Political Economy: An Urban Perspective, edited by D. M. Gordon. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
Polachek, Solomon W.
姜蘭虹
1979 “Occupational Segregation among Women: Theory, Evidence, and a Prognosis.” Pp. 137-157 in Women in the Labor Market, edited by Cynthia B. Lloyd, Emily S. Andrews, and Curtis C. Gilroy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Reskin, Barbara F. and Heidi I. Hartmann
1986 “The Significance of Sex Segregation in the Workplace.” Pp. 1-17 in
Women`s Work, Men`s Work: Sex Segregation on the Job, edited by Reskin, Barbara F. and Heidi I. Hartmann. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Reskin, Barbara F. and Roos, Patricia A.
1990 Job Queues, Gender Queues. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Reskin, Barbara F.
1993 “Sex Segregation in the Workplace.” Annual Review of Sociology 19: 241-270.
Schultz, Theodore William
1992 《台灣地區女性勞工生活素質與福利需求之研究》。台北市:行政院勞工委員會。
1960 “Capital Formation by Education.” Journal of Political Economy 68(6): 571-583.
1961 “Investment in Human Capital.” American Economic Review 51(1): 1-17.
Tam, Tony
1996 “Reducing the Gender Gap in an Asian Economy: How Important is Women’s Increasing Work Experience?” World Development 24(5): 831-844.
1997 “Sex Segregation and Occupational Gender Inequality in the United States: Devaluation or Specialized Training.” American Journal of Sociology 102(6): 1652-1692.
1999 “Long-Term Occupational Sex Segregation in the United States: A Multifaceted Perspective.” Paper presented at the conference on European-American Social Structure and Social Change: Gender, Age, and Verbal Ability, Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica, December 17, 1999.
2001a “Labor Market Sex Segregation in the U.S.: A Topological Perspective for 1850-1990.” presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.
2001b “The Index of Standardized Percent Women: A Flexible Odds-Ratio Approach to Measuring Sex Segregation in the Workplace.”
Treiman, Donald J. and Heidi I. Hartmann
1981 Women, Work, and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
高月霞、陳仕偉
Treiman, Donald J. and Kermit Terrell
1975 “Women, Work, and Wages – Trends in the Female Occupation Structure.” Pp. 157-199 in Social Indicator Models, edited by Kenneth C. Land and Seymour Spilerman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Tsai, S. L.
1984 “Sex and Social Stratification: A Review of Literature.” Chinese Journal of Sociology 8: 223-239.
Weeden, Kim A.
1998 “Revisiting Occupational Sex Segregation in the United States, 1910-1990: Results from A Log-linear approach.” Demography 35(4): 475-487.
Weeden and Sørensen
2001 “Industrial and Occupational Sex Segregation in the United States.” Pp. 250-296 in Sex Segregation in Comparative Perspective.
Williams, Gregory
1994 〈台灣婦女勞動參與行為之因果關係分析〉。《婦女與兩性學刊》5:1-45。台北:台大人口研究中心婦女研究室。
1979 “The Changing U.S. Labor Force and Occupational Differentiation by Sex.” Demography 16(1): 73-87.
高長
1993 〈臺灣地區婦女就業與性別歧視之實證研究〉。《臺灣銀行季刊》,44(4):223-248。台北:臺灣銀行。
徐宗國
1988 〈是為少數者?—女性與工作研究上的一些回顧與芻議〉。《婦女研究暑期研習會論文集》,頁45-68。台北市:國立台灣大學人口研究中心婦女研究室。
張晉芬、賴錦慧
1993 〈台灣勞動市場的性別職業隔離〉,發表於「婦女就業與教育訓練」研討會,新女性聯合會與行政院勞工委員會主辦。
張晉芬
1991 〈員工性別組成對美國製造業勞動結果的影響:1950-1980〉。頁75-107,收錄於郭實渝主編,《美國婦女與社會研討會論文集》。台北:中研院歐美所。
1994 〈產業性別隔離的檢證與分析〉。頁99-125,收錄於張晉芬、曾瑞鈴主編,《美國與台灣社會結構研究》。台北:中研院歐美所。
1995 〈工作篇—綿綿此恨,可有絕期?—女性工作困境之剖析〉。頁145-180,收錄於劉毓秀主編,《台灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年》,台北:時報文化出版公司。
1996 〈女性勞動者婚育離職原因之探討〉。《第三回台灣勞動研究》,頁1-21。台北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。
陳月娥
2000 《勞動市場職業性別隔離決定性因素之研究》,國立台灣大學國家發展研究所博士論文。
陳建志
1998 《台灣地區就業市場性別階層化之探討》,國立臺東師範學院國民教育研究所。
陳皎眉、關永馨
1995 〈個人及環境因素與逃避事業成就傾向、工作滿意的關係〉。頁449-485,收錄於劉克智主編《台灣人力資源論文集》。台北:聯經。
陳曉穎
1996 《高等教育中的性別隔離與女性就業》,國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。
黃毅志
1999 〈台灣地區新職業分類的建構與評估〉。頁217-246,收錄於黃毅志編,《社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識—臺灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續》。台北:巨流。
2001 〈台灣地區勞力市場分隔之探討:流動表分析〉,《台灣社會學刊》25:157-200。台北:台灣社會學會。
曾敏傑
1994 《台灣地區社經發展與兩性薪資差異:以1982及1992年為例》,私立文化大學中山學術研究所博士論文。
傅立葉
1993 〈台灣社會保險制度的社會控制本質〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》15:39-64。
1995a 〈從女性的觀點看社會民主的福利原則〉,《婦女與兩性研究通訊》34:6-9。
1995b 〈我國政府支出的政治經濟分析〉。頁161-206,收錄於《台灣的社會福利—民間觀點》。
1995c 〈社會福利篇—建構女人的福利國〉。頁7-36,收錄於劉毓秀主編,《台灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年》。台北:時報文化出版公司。
1999 〈女性與年金權〉,《國立政治大學社會學報》29:53-73。台北:國立政治大學社會學系。
劉玉蘭
1984 《臺灣地區婦女人力運用情形之分析》,余煥模、張丕繼主編。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會人力規劃小組。
龍文彬
1998 〈以戶口及住宅普查資料檔為抽樣母體之實務應用與探討〉。《調查研究》6:87-109。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。
2000 〈人力資源調查方法改進芻議〉。《調查研究》8:43-78。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。
謝小芩
1998 〈性別與教育期望〉。《婦女與兩性學刊》9:205-231。台北:台大人口研究中心婦女研究室。
蔡青龍
1988 〈婦女勞動再參與的初步分析〉。《經濟論文叢刊》16(3):150。台北市:國立台灣大學經濟學系。
蔡青龍、張美陽
1996 〈勞動市場之性別差異—以臺灣為例兼與亞太各國比較〉。頁213-254,收錄於陳肇男等主編,《人口、就業與福利》。台北:中央研究院經濟學研究所。
蔡淑鈴
1987 〈職業隔離現象與教育成就:性別之比較分析〉,《中國社會學刊》11:61-91。
蔡勳雄、劉克智
1991 〈台灣都市成長與就業結構之調整〉。頁143-164,收錄於劉克智主編《台灣人力資源論文集》。台北:聯經。
薛承泰
1996 〈台灣地區職業地位測量與性別差異〉。《調查研究:方法與應用》,1:67-121。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。
顧燕翎
1988 〈婦女研究專論—檢視台灣當前的婦女地位〉。《婦女研究通訊》第13期,頁29-31。台北市:台灣大學人口研究中心婦女研究室。
蕭淑滿
2001 《台灣地區兩性職業區隔變遷之研究》,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。
嚴祥鸞
1996a 〈兩性工作平等制度之實質基礎:解構社會文化和制度的性別隔離現象〉。頁191-220,收錄於焦興凱主編《歐美兩性工作平等制度之比較研究》。台北市:中央研究院歐美研究所。
1996b  〈女性作業員的謎思:一個女性化職業建構過程〉。第三回台灣勞動研究》,頁1-31。台北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。
Bell, Daniel著、高銛、王宏周、魏章玲譯
1989 《後工業社會的來臨:對社會預測的一項探索》。台北市:桂冠。
Magezis, Joy著、何穎怡譯
2000 《女性研究自學讀本》。台北市:女書文化。
Schwarzer, Alice著、劉燕芬譯
2001 《大性別—人只有一種性別》。台北市:臺灣商務印書館。
Anker, Richard
1997 “Theories of Occupational Segregation by Sex: An Overview.” International Labour Review, 136(3): 315-339.
Arrow, Kenneth Joseph
1973 “The Theory of Discrimination.” Pp. 3-33 in Discrimination in Labor Markets, edited by Orley Ashenfelter and Albert Ress. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Bayard, K., Hellerstein, J., Neumark D. and K. Troske
1999 “New Evidence on Sex Segregation and Sex Differences in Wages from Matched Employee-Employer Data.” NBER Working Paper No. 7003.
Becker, Gary Stanley
1962 “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 70(5 Part 2): S9-S49.
1964 Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research; distributed by Columbia University Press.
Beller, Andrea H.
1984 “Trends in occupational segregation by sex and race, 1960-1981.” Pp. 11-26 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Bergmann, Barbara R.
1971 “The Effect on White Incomes of Discrimination in Employment.” Journal of Political Economy 79: 294-313.
1974 “Occupational Segregation, Wages and Profits when Employer Discriminate By Race and Sex.” Eastern Economic Journal 1: 103-110.
Bianchi, Suzanne M. and Nancy Rytina
1986 “The decline in occupational sex segregation during the 1970s: Census and CPS comparisons.” Demography 23(1): 79-86.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學研究所
90254003
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902540031
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 譚康榮zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Tam,Tonyen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 姜馨彥zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chiang, Hsin Yenen_US
dc.creator (作者) 姜馨彥zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chiang, Hsin Yenen_US
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 14-Sep-2009 13:22:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 14-Sep-2009 13:22:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 14-Sep-2009 13:22:57 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0902540031en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32198-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 社會學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90254003zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本論文採用民國六十七年至九十一年人力資源調查五月份的資料,建構人力資源調查合併資料檔案,根據相異指數、以及Tam(2001b)的標準化女性比例,進行職業層次、產業層次、工作層次性別隔離的程度和樣貌的趨勢分析,並以三維立體圖形方法呈現結果。研究結果顯示,職業層次的性別隔離近乎整合且標準化女性比例的百分比座落在60%至70%之職業有逐漸增多的趨勢、產業層次的性別隔離也呈現整合而中性職業增加的趨勢、至於工作層次性別隔離程度則逐漸下降且也呈現出整合的趨勢變化,而工作層次性別隔離程度高過職業層次性別隔離程度。另採用民國六十九年與七十九年台閩地區戶口及住宅普查資料完整母體資料所建構的工作層次資料,以檢驗使用人力運用調查的樣本資料得出之工作層次資料的結果,證明後者的分析具有效度。而採用普查資料進行探究也發現,無論是在更細緻的職業層次(三分位職業代碼)和工作層次(三分位職業代碼與二分位行業代碼的工作代碼組合)、或者是在與人力資源調查相同的職業層次(二分位職業代碼)和工作層次(二分位職業代碼與二分位行業代碼的工作代碼組合)的分析層次下,採用相異指數和標準化女性比例的結果皆是性別隔離程度下降、也呈現出整合的趨勢變化,工作層次性別隔離程度也高過職業層次性別隔離程度,然其僅提供十年間的資訊,實為可惜之處。zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) This study uses data from 1978-2002 Manpower Utilization Survey (MUS) for analyzing, ultimately, job-level sex segregation in Taiwanese workplace. Taking into account the limitation of large amount of small-N job cells due to the relatively smaller sample sizes, the method of mid-point of interval estimation and 5-year aggregation is applied with its strength of consecutive data series: pooling data across 1978 to 1982 as estimation for year 1980, and so on, to construct 5-year aggregated MUS data. To view the job-level sex segregation pattern, job-level datasets are established by the “combination of occupation and industry codes”, from which there are units of analysis, job cells. And discarding small-N reliable sampled jobs in MUS is essential to avoid biased results for they contain extreme sex composition after comparing with those from population data of 1980 and 1990 Taiwanese Censuses. Findings indicate that the degree of occupational, industrial, and job-level sex segregation is somewhat increasing by Duncan and Duncan’s Dissimilarity Index, by which it is unable to measure the exact segregation degree because of its margin-dependent trait. However, by using Tam’s margin-free index: Standardized Percent Women, findings indicate that: (1) for occupational-level sex segregation, there is a trend of integration, and those occupations with 60%- 70% SPWOM shows a slight increase; (2) for industrial sex segregation, the trend almost remain the same, just that gender-neutral industries increase a bit, especially in recent years; (3) as for the degree of job-level sex segregation, it is declining, and there is a long-term trend of integration in Taiwanese workplace over the past 25 years. Therefore, job-level analysis does show what the past occupational and industrial analysis cannot present. And the findings from MUS are robust, based on the contrast analysis from population data of 1980 and 1990 Taiwanese Censuses; in addition, research outcomes from Census data also show integrated pattern in occupational and job-level sex segregation in that decade.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 前言 1
     第一節 台灣工業與經濟的成長 4
     第二節 台灣職業性別隔離的相關研究 7
     第三節 台灣職場性別隔離研究的重要性 9
     第二章 文獻回顧與理論探討 12
     第一節 性別隔離指標的演進 16
     第二節 勞動市場性別隔離的研究層次 19
     第三節 職業性別隔離的相關理論探討 23
     第四節 研究假設 27
     第三章 研究設計與方法 29
     第一節 資料來源 29
     第二節 工作代碼的建構與工作層次的分析 32
     第三節 相關的性別隔離指標與分析層次 37
     第四章 初步的研究發現 42
     第一節 人力資源調查職業層次性別隔離的長期趨勢 42
     第二節 人力資源調查產業層次性別隔離的長期趨勢 45
     第三節 人力資源調查工作層次性別隔離的長期趨勢 48
     第五章 研究資料的限制與解決辦法 52
     第一節 人力資源調查的缺點、限制 52
     第二節 台閩地區戶口及住宅普查資料的優點 53
     第三節 工作層次的測量誤差分析 59
     第四節 人力資源調查資料的工作層次性別隔離分析效度 65
     第六章 結論 67
     參考書目 72
     附錄一、人力資源調查職業層次的性別隔離程度和樣貌 81
     附錄二、人力資源調查產業層次的性別隔離程度和樣貌 86
     
     
     表目次
     
     表1-1 8
     表3-1 1978年至2002年人力資源調查資料的行業與職業分類更動 32
     表3-2 1980年和1990年普查資料中的可靠工作類別(類型I)範例 34
     表3-3 1980年和1990年普查資料中的可靠工作類別(類型II)範例 35
     表3-4 1980年和1990年人力資源調查五年合併資料中的可靠工作類別(類型II)範例 35
     表3-5 1978年至2002年人力資源調查的資料資訊 36
     表3-6 人力資源調查五年合併資料的工作類別資訊 37
     表3-7 次數分佈圖 39
     表3-8 聯合性分佈圖 39
     表3-9 條件性分佈圖 40
     表3-10 聯合性分佈圖 40
     表3-11 條件性分佈圖 41
     表4-1 人力資源調查五年合併資料各年度的工作層次相異指數數據 49
     表5-1 1980年與1990年普查的三分位和二分位職業代碼、以及工作類別類型I(3X2 CODES)和工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的相異指數數據 54
     表5-2 1980年普查資料中不同規模的工作類別中之女性比例分佈 62
     表5-3 1990年普查資料中不同規模的工作類別中之女性比例分佈 62
     表5-4 1980年人力資源調查五年合併資料中不同規模的工作類別中之女性比例分佈 63
     表5-5 1990年人力資源調查五年合併資料中不同規模的工作類別中之女性比例分佈 63
     
     
     
     圖目次
     圖1-1 西元1965年至2004年台灣女性勞動參與率的長期趨勢 2
     圖1-2 西元1978年至2004年台灣女性勞動參與率的長期趨勢 3
     圖2-1 西元1890年至1986年美國女性勞動參與率的長期趨勢 13
     圖3-1 1978年至2002年人力資源調查的台灣女性勞動參與率長期趨勢 31
     圖3-2 1978年至2002年人力資源調查的台灣勞動市場女性比例長期趨勢 31
     圖4-1 1978年至2002年一分位和原始二分位的職業代碼、以及工作代碼組合的相異指數數據趨勢 43
     圖4-2 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之二分位的職業層次女性比例的長期趨勢 44
     圖4-3 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之二分位的職業層次標準化女性比例的長期趨勢 44
     圖4-4 西元1978年至2002年產業層次相異指數數據的長期趨勢 46
     圖4-5 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之二分位的產業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 47
     圖4-6 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之二分位的產業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 48
     圖4-7 西元1978年至2002年工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的工作層次女性比例的百分比分佈 50
     圖4-8 西元1978年至2002年工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的工作層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 50
     圖5-1 1980年與1990年三分位和二分位的職業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 55
     圖5-2 1980年與1990年三分位和二分位的職業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 55
     圖5-3 1980年與1990年工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的工作層次女性比例的百分比分佈 57
     圖5-4 1980年與1990年工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的工作層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 57
     圖5-5 1980年與1990年工作類別類型I(3X2 CODES)工作層次女性比例的百分比分佈 58
     圖5-6 1980年與1990年工作類別類型I(3X2 CODES)工作層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 58
     圖5-7 1980年普查資料中工作類別類型I(3X2 CODES)的編碼誤差率分佈 60
     圖5-8 1990年普查資料中工作類別類型I(3X2 CODES)的編碼誤差率分佈 60
     圖5-9 1980年與1990年普查資料中工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的編碼誤差率分佈 61
     圖5-10 1980年與1990年普查資料中工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的編碼誤差率分佈 61
     圖5-11 1980年普查與人力資源調查資料中工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的女性比例關聯性 64
     圖5-12 1990年普查與人力資源調查資料中工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的女性比例關聯性 64
     圖5-13 1980年與1990年工作類別類型I(3X2 CODES)、以及工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的工作層次女性比例的百分比分佈 65
     圖5-14 1980年與1990年工作類別類型I(3X2 CODES)、以及工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的工作層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 66
     圖6-1 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之二分位的職業層次標準化女性比例的長期趨勢 69
     圖6-2 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之二分位的產業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 69
     圖6-3 西元1978年至2002年工作類別類型II(2X2 CODES)的工作層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 70
     附圖1-1 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之一分位的職業層次女性比例的長期趨勢 81
     附圖1-2 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之一分位的職業層次標準化女性比例的長期趨勢 81
     附圖1-3 1978年至1992年原始二分位的職業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 82
     附圖1-4 1993年至2002年原始二分位的職業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 83
     附圖1-5 1978年至1992年原始二分位的職業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 83
     附圖1-6 1993年至2002年原始二分位的職業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 84
     附圖1-7 1978年至2002年完全隔離之原始二分位的職業的百分比分佈 85
     附圖2-1 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之一點五分位的產業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 86
     附圖2-2 西元1978年至2002年編碼後一致之一點五分位的產業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 86
     附圖2-3 西元1978年至1984年原始二分位的產業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 87
     附圖2-4 西元1985年至1992年原始二分位的產業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 88
     附圖2-5 西元1993年至1996年原始二分位的產業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 88
     附圖2-6 西元1997年至2000年原始二分位的產業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 89
     附圖2-7 西元2001年至2002年原始二分位的產業層次女性比例的百分比分佈 89
     附圖2-8 西元1978年至1984年原始二分位的產業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 90
     附圖2-9 西元1985年至1992年原始二分位的產業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 90
     附圖2-10 西元1993年至1996年原始二分位的產業層次標準化女性比例的百分分佈 91
     附圖2-11 西元1997年至2000年原始二分位的產業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 91
     附圖2-12 西元2001年至2002年原始二分位的產業層次標準化女性比例的百分比分佈 92
zh_TW
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902540031en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 工作層次性別隔離zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 邊際自由指標zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 標準化女性比例zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) job-level sex segregationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) margin-free indexen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Standardized Percent Womenen_US
dc.title (題名) 台灣職場性別隔離的趨勢zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Trends of Sex Segregation in the Taiwanese Workplaceen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 于若蓉zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2002 〈人力資源調查合併資料—樣本流失問題初探〉。《調查研究》5:5-36。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王雅芬zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1993 〈台灣地區職業結構性別差異與教育程度關聯性之研究〉。《勞工研究》113:20-31。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王麗容zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995 〈臺灣女性勞動參與和未回應的勞動政策—一個角色平等與角色變遷之檢視〉。海峽兩岸人口現象的分析國際學術研討會論文集,頁383-407。台北:台灣大學人口研究中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院主計處zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001 《中華民國八十九年臺灣地區人力資源調查統計年報》。台北市:行政院主計處。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院勞工委員會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998 女性勞動情勢簡析http://statdb.cla.gov.tw/html/com/h0949.doc。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2000 《中華民國八十九年臺灣地區婦女就業平等狀況調查報告》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bielby, William T. and James N. Baronzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1984 “A Woman’s Place is with Other Women: Sex Segregation within Organisations.” Pp. 27-55 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations and Remedies, edited by Reskin, Barbara F. National Academic Press: Washington.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1986 “Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 759-799.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bishop, Y., Fienberg, S. and Holland, P.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1975 Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Blau, Francine, D.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1984 “Occupational Segregation and Labor Market Discrimination.” Pp. 117-143 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998 “Differences in Occupations and Earnings: Overview.” Pp. 123-140 in The Economisc of Women, Men and Work.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Blau, Francine, D. and Wallace E. Hendrickszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1979 “Occupational Segregation by Sex: Trends and Prospects.” Journal of Human Resources 14(2): 197-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林忠正(Lin,Chung-cheng)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Blau, Peter Michael and Otis Dudley Duncanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1967 The American Occupation Structure. New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burris, Val and Amy Whartonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1982 “Sex Segregation in the U.S. Labor Force.” Review of Radical Political Economics 14(3): 43-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chang, Mariko Linzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2000 “The Evolution of Sex Segregation Regimes.” American Journal of Sociology 105: 1658-1701.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Charles, Mariazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1992 “Cross-National Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation.” American Sociological Review 57: 483-502.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998 “Structure, Culture, and Sex Segregation in Europe.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 16: 89-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1988 〈Occupational Segregation between Sexes in Taiwan〉。《人文及社會集刊》2(1):155-175。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Charles, Maria and David B. Gruskyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995 “Models for Describing the Underlying Structure of Sex Segregation.” American Journal of Sociology 100(4): 931-971.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Corcoran Mary, Greg J. Duncan and Michael Ponzazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1984 “Work experiences, Job Segregation, and Wages.” Pp. 171-191 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coventry, Barbara Thomaszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 “Do Men Leave Feminizing Occupations?” Social Science Journal 36(1): 47-71.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Duncan, Otis Dudley and Beverly Duncanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1955 “A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indexes.” American Sociological Review 20: 210-217.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) England, Paulazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1981 “Assessing Trends in Occupational Sex Segregation, 1900-1976.” Pp. 273-295 in Sociological Perspectives on Labor Market, edited by Ivar Berg. New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林季平、章英華zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Epstein, Cynthia Puchszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1970 Woman’s Place: Options and Limits in Professional Careers. Berkeley: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gibbs, J. P.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1965 “Occupational Differentiation of Negroes and Whites in the United States.” Social Forces 44: 159-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Griffiths, Martha W.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1976 “Can we still afford occupational sex segregation? Some remarks.” Pp. 7-14 in Women and the workplace: the implications of occupational segregation, edited by Martha Blaxall and Barbara Reagan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gross, Edwardzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1968 “Plus ça Chang…? The Sexual Structure of Occupation over Time.” Social Problem 16: 198-208.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grusky, David B. and Maria Charleszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998 “The Past, Present, and Future of Sex Segregation Methodology.” Demography 35(4): 497-504.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2003 〈人力運用擬—追蹤調查資料庫的產生過程、應用現況、及未來發展〉。《調查研究》,13:39-69。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hakim, Catherinezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1981 “Job Segregation: Trends in the 1970s.” Employment Gazette 89(12): 521-529.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hatt, Suezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1997 “Men’s Jobs, Women’s Jobs.” Pp. 65-82 in Gender, Work, and Labour Markets. Basingstoke, Hampshire, [England]: Macmillan Press; New York: St. Martin’s Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jacobs, Jerry A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1989 “Long-Term Trend in Occupational Segregation by Sex.” American Journal of Sociology 95(1): 160-173.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 “The Sex Segregation of Occupations.” Pp. 125-141 in Handbook of Gender and Work, edited by Gary N. Powell, Gary N. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kessler-Harris, Alicezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001 In Pursuit of Equity: Women, Men, and the Quest for Economiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 俞慧君zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Citizenship in 20th Century America. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lee, Joseph S.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1979 “An Empirical Study of the Functioning of the Labor Market in Taiwan.” Academia Economic Paper 8: 171-244.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marini, Margaret Mooney and Mary C. Brintonzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1984 “Sex Typing in Occupational Socializaton.” Pp. 192-232 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Merton, Robert K.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1957 Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe, ILL: Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mincer, James and Solomon W. Polachekzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1974 “Family Investments in the Human Capital: Earnings of Women.” Journal of Political Economy 2: S76-S108.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) NORCzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1987 《女性工作平等權》。台北市:蔚理法律出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 “Industrial Classifications Distributions in Appendix H” in General Social Surveys, 1972-1998: Cumulative Codebook, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincadezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1974 “The Sex Labeling of Jobs.”in Women and Achievement: Social and Motivational Analysis, edited by Martha T. S. Mednick, Sandra S. Tangri, and Lois W. Hoffman. New York: Wiley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Petersen, Trond and Morgan, Laurie A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995 “Separate and Unequal: Occupation-Establishment Sex Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap.” American Journal of Sociology, 101(2): 329-365.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Phelps, Edmund S.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1972 “The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism.” American Economic Review 62: 4659-4661.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Piore, Michael J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1971 “The Dual Labor Market: Theory and Implications.” Pp. 90-94. in Problems In Political Economy: An Urban Perspective, edited by D. M. Gordon. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Polachek, Solomon W.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 姜蘭虹zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1979 “Occupational Segregation among Women: Theory, Evidence, and a Prognosis.” Pp. 137-157 in Women in the Labor Market, edited by Cynthia B. Lloyd, Emily S. Andrews, and Curtis C. Gilroy. New York: Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reskin, Barbara F. and Heidi I. Hartmannzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1986 “The Significance of Sex Segregation in the Workplace.” Pp. 1-17 inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Women`s Work, Men`s Work: Sex Segregation on the Job, edited by Reskin, Barbara F. and Heidi I. Hartmann. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reskin, Barbara F. and Roos, Patricia A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1990 Job Queues, Gender Queues. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reskin, Barbara F.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1993 “Sex Segregation in the Workplace.” Annual Review of Sociology 19: 241-270.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schultz, Theodore Williamzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1992 《台灣地區女性勞工生活素質與福利需求之研究》。台北市:行政院勞工委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1960 “Capital Formation by Education.” Journal of Political Economy 68(6): 571-583.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1961 “Investment in Human Capital.” American Economic Review 51(1): 1-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tam, Tonyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1996 “Reducing the Gender Gap in an Asian Economy: How Important is Women’s Increasing Work Experience?” World Development 24(5): 831-844.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1997 “Sex Segregation and Occupational Gender Inequality in the United States: Devaluation or Specialized Training.” American Journal of Sociology 102(6): 1652-1692.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 “Long-Term Occupational Sex Segregation in the United States: A Multifaceted Perspective.” Paper presented at the conference on European-American Social Structure and Social Change: Gender, Age, and Verbal Ability, Institute of European and American Studies, Academia Sinica, December 17, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001a “Labor Market Sex Segregation in the U.S.: A Topological Perspective for 1850-1990.” presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001b “The Index of Standardized Percent Women: A Flexible Odds-Ratio Approach to Measuring Sex Segregation in the Workplace.”zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Treiman, Donald J. and Heidi I. Hartmannzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1981 Women, Work, and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高月霞、陳仕偉zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Treiman, Donald J. and Kermit Terrellzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1975 “Women, Work, and Wages – Trends in the Female Occupation Structure.” Pp. 157-199 in Social Indicator Models, edited by Kenneth C. Land and Seymour Spilerman. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tsai, S. L.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1984 “Sex and Social Stratification: A Review of Literature.” Chinese Journal of Sociology 8: 223-239.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weeden, Kim A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998 “Revisiting Occupational Sex Segregation in the United States, 1910-1990: Results from A Log-linear approach.” Demography 35(4): 475-487.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weeden and Sørensenzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001 “Industrial and Occupational Sex Segregation in the United States.” Pp. 250-296 in Sex Segregation in Comparative Perspective.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Williams, Gregoryzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1994 〈台灣婦女勞動參與行為之因果關係分析〉。《婦女與兩性學刊》5:1-45。台北:台大人口研究中心婦女研究室。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1979 “The Changing U.S. Labor Force and Occupational Differentiation by Sex.” Demography 16(1): 73-87.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高長zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1993 〈臺灣地區婦女就業與性別歧視之實證研究〉。《臺灣銀行季刊》,44(4):223-248。台北:臺灣銀行。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐宗國zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1988 〈是為少數者?—女性與工作研究上的一些回顧與芻議〉。《婦女研究暑期研習會論文集》,頁45-68。台北市:國立台灣大學人口研究中心婦女研究室。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張晉芬、賴錦慧zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1993 〈台灣勞動市場的性別職業隔離〉,發表於「婦女就業與教育訓練」研討會,新女性聯合會與行政院勞工委員會主辦。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張晉芬zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1991 〈員工性別組成對美國製造業勞動結果的影響:1950-1980〉。頁75-107,收錄於郭實渝主編,《美國婦女與社會研討會論文集》。台北:中研院歐美所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1994 〈產業性別隔離的檢證與分析〉。頁99-125,收錄於張晉芬、曾瑞鈴主編,《美國與台灣社會結構研究》。台北:中研院歐美所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995 〈工作篇—綿綿此恨,可有絕期?—女性工作困境之剖析〉。頁145-180,收錄於劉毓秀主編,《台灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年》,台北:時報文化出版公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1996 〈女性勞動者婚育離職原因之探討〉。《第三回台灣勞動研究》,頁1-21。台北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳月娥zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2000 《勞動市場職業性別隔離決定性因素之研究》,國立台灣大學國家發展研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳建志zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998 《台灣地區就業市場性別階層化之探討》,國立臺東師範學院國民教育研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳皎眉、關永馨zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995 〈個人及環境因素與逃避事業成就傾向、工作滿意的關係〉。頁449-485,收錄於劉克智主編《台灣人力資源論文集》。台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳曉穎zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1996 《高等教育中的性別隔離與女性就業》,國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃毅志zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 〈台灣地區新職業分類的建構與評估〉。頁217-246,收錄於黃毅志編,《社會階層、社會網絡與主觀意識—臺灣地區不公平的社會階層體系之延續》。台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001 〈台灣地區勞力市場分隔之探討:流動表分析〉,《台灣社會學刊》25:157-200。台北:台灣社會學會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曾敏傑zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1994 《台灣地區社經發展與兩性薪資差異:以1982及1992年為例》,私立文化大學中山學術研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 傅立葉zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1993 〈台灣社會保險制度的社會控制本質〉,《台灣社會研究季刊》15:39-64。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995a 〈從女性的觀點看社會民主的福利原則〉,《婦女與兩性研究通訊》34:6-9。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995b 〈我國政府支出的政治經濟分析〉。頁161-206,收錄於《台灣的社會福利—民間觀點》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995c 〈社會福利篇—建構女人的福利國〉。頁7-36,收錄於劉毓秀主編,《台灣婦女處境白皮書:1995年》。台北:時報文化出版公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 〈女性與年金權〉,《國立政治大學社會學報》29:53-73。台北:國立政治大學社會學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉玉蘭zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1984 《臺灣地區婦女人力運用情形之分析》,余煥模、張丕繼主編。台北:行政院經濟建設委員會人力規劃小組。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 龍文彬zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998 〈以戶口及住宅普查資料檔為抽樣母體之實務應用與探討〉。《調查研究》6:87-109。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2000 〈人力資源調查方法改進芻議〉。《調查研究》8:43-78。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝小芩zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998 〈性別與教育期望〉。《婦女與兩性學刊》9:205-231。台北:台大人口研究中心婦女研究室。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡青龍zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1988 〈婦女勞動再參與的初步分析〉。《經濟論文叢刊》16(3):150。台北市:國立台灣大學經濟學系。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡青龍、張美陽zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1996 〈勞動市場之性別差異—以臺灣為例兼與亞太各國比較〉。頁213-254,收錄於陳肇男等主編,《人口、就業與福利》。台北:中央研究院經濟學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡淑鈴zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1987 〈職業隔離現象與教育成就:性別之比較分析〉,《中國社會學刊》11:61-91。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡勳雄、劉克智zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1991 〈台灣都市成長與就業結構之調整〉。頁143-164,收錄於劉克智主編《台灣人力資源論文集》。台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 薛承泰zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1996 〈台灣地區職業地位測量與性別差異〉。《調查研究:方法與應用》,1:67-121。台北:中央研究院調查研究專題中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顧燕翎zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1988 〈婦女研究專論—檢視台灣當前的婦女地位〉。《婦女研究通訊》第13期,頁29-31。台北市:台灣大學人口研究中心婦女研究室。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭淑滿zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001 《台灣地區兩性職業區隔變遷之研究》,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 嚴祥鸞zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1996a 〈兩性工作平等制度之實質基礎:解構社會文化和制度的性別隔離現象〉。頁191-220,收錄於焦興凱主編《歐美兩性工作平等制度之比較研究》。台北市:中央研究院歐美研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1996b  〈女性作業員的謎思:一個女性化職業建構過程〉。第三回台灣勞動研究》,頁1-31。台北市:中央研究院社會學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bell, Daniel著、高銛、王宏周、魏章玲譯zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1989 《後工業社會的來臨:對社會預測的一項探索》。台北市:桂冠。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Magezis, Joy著、何穎怡譯zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2000 《女性研究自學讀本》。台北市:女書文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schwarzer, Alice著、劉燕芬譯zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001 《大性別—人只有一種性別》。台北市:臺灣商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anker, Richardzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1997 “Theories of Occupational Segregation by Sex: An Overview.” International Labour Review, 136(3): 315-339.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arrow, Kenneth Josephzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1973 “The Theory of Discrimination.” Pp. 3-33 in Discrimination in Labor Markets, edited by Orley Ashenfelter and Albert Ress. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bayard, K., Hellerstein, J., Neumark D. and K. Troskezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 “New Evidence on Sex Segregation and Sex Differences in Wages from Matched Employee-Employer Data.” NBER Working Paper No. 7003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Becker, Gary Stanleyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1962 “Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 70(5 Part 2): S9-S49.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1964 Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research; distributed by Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beller, Andrea H.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1984 “Trends in occupational segregation by sex and race, 1960-1981.” Pp. 11-26 in Sex Segregation in the Workplace: Trends, Explanations, Remedies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bergmann, Barbara R.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1971 “The Effect on White Incomes of Discrimination in Employment.” Journal of Political Economy 79: 294-313.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1974 “Occupational Segregation, Wages and Profits when Employer Discriminate By Race and Sex.” Eastern Economic Journal 1: 103-110.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bianchi, Suzanne M. and Nancy Rytinazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1986 “The decline in occupational sex segregation during the 1970s: Census and CPS comparisons.” Demography 23(1): 79-86.zh_TW