dc.contributor.advisor | 劉小蘭 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Liu, Hsiao Lan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 郭麗美 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Kuo, Li Mei | en_US |
dc.creator (作者) | 郭麗美 | zh_TW |
dc.creator (作者) | Kuo, Li Mei | en_US |
dc.date (日期) | 2008 | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 14-Sep-2009 13:56:34 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.available | 14-Sep-2009 13:56:34 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 14-Sep-2009 13:56:34 (UTC+8) | - |
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0096924001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32419 | - |
dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 臺灣研究英語碩士學程 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 96924001 | zh_TW |
dc.description (描述) | 97 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 在台灣經歷少子化而後,國小超額老師問題相形嚴重. 故本論文以個案研究方式探討中型學校士東國小的資深與資淺教師為例,就學校歷史文化,課程設計,領導風格,及學校效能方面來探討教師在教職生涯滿意度與家長對教師之期望. | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Since the phenomenon of low fertility rate emergent in Taiwan, the teacher of the primary education suffered and gradually caused the sever problem of the surplus elementary school teacher. Hence, the Shih-Tung elementary, a medium size school, is the scale aligned with optimal scale for government to borrow the experience. The thesis applied a case study method of in-depth interview for related party of teachers and parents of Shih-Tung Elementary School. Initially from retrieving the education core both from definition and ancient wisdom testing the true meaning for the primary education. It is discussed from the culture of the school, the belief of an organization, which is the symbol of pine, big pencil and eraser under persistent learning, preceding that, from the culture to the curriculum design in terms of characteristic of the school, the charm of the school which made less decline of the student enrollment. Moreover, from the leadership style to verify how it formed the consensus and the acceptance form the teachers, which later on lead the effectiveness of the school. Further, it is focused on the organizational behavior analysis applying the Hierarchy of Needs Theory and Motivator-Hygiene Theory to analyze the satisfaction factors of the teachers in the school. The main parts for the central idea are focused on the teachers’ attitude in relation with the satisfaction factors in the case school, in words, the organizational behavior of the case school. Hence, the discussions are brought under school culture and curriculum design, leadership style and school effectiveness, teachers’ working satisfaction and inspiration, parents’ expectation. Consequently, the result and suggestions are made for the 2 parts: one for the school, and the other for the government under the transition of the era. The suggestions are made for the school as to keep the culture and inheritance of the senior to the junior teacher as legacy, and improving the environment for more efficient purpose of using and curriculum design under innovated way under long history. And utilize the human resource of unmarried woman, and build a communicative talk relationship with the parents since the mutual understanding of both parties are changing from authorities to cooperative and increasing junior teachers in the near future. | en_US |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….i Thanks……………………………………………………………………………….ii Table of Contents…………………………………………………………………....iii List of Tables…………………………………………………………………………v Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….1 1.1 Motivation…………………………………….…………………………….1 1.2 Research Questions…………………………………………….……..…….4 1.3 Significance of the Thesis….……………………………………………….5 1.4 Research Scope…………..…………………………………………………5 Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………....6 2.1 Definition of Education Core……………………………………………….6 2.2 Perspective from Ancient Wisdom on Education Core……………….…….9 2.3 Theories of Organizational Behavior…..…………………….…………….14 2.4 Parents Participation………………………………………………….,…....22 2.5 Retirement Policy of Primary Teacher………………………………..…....23 Chapter 3 INTRODUCTION OF CASE SCHOOL…………….……………...26 3.1 Background Information: Education Policy of Taipei City……………….26 3.2 Basic Data of the Case School………………………………………..…...30 3.3 Administration and Management………………………………………….41 iii Chapter 4 METHODOLOGY……………………………........……….……….43 4.1 Research Infrastructure…………………………………..………………..43 4.2 Participants………………………………………………..……………….43 4.3 Research Tool…………………………………………………………..….43 4.4 Research Procedures…………………………………………………........44 4.5 Statistics Analysis……………………………………………...………….45 Chapter 5 DISCUSSION……………………………….……………………….48 5.1 School Culture and Curriculum Design……………………………….…..48 5.2 Leadership Style and School Effectiveness…………………………....…..53 5.3 Teachers’ Working Satisfaction and Inspiration…………………………...60 5.4 Parents Expectations………………………………………………….……64 Chapter 6 CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS………..…………..….….…67 6.1 Conclusions…………………………………………………………….…..67 6.2 Suggestions………………………………………………………….……..76 6.3 Research Limitation and Future Study……………………………….…....81 5.4 Government Policy on Teachers REFERENCES………………………………………………………….…….........83 | zh_TW |
dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096924001 | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 少子化 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 教育核心 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 國小教師 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 學校效能 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 組織行為 | zh_TW |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | low fertility rate | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | education core | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | elementary school teacher | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | school effectiveness | en_US |
dc.subject (關鍵詞) | organizational behavior | en_US |
dc.title (題名) | 組織行為之分析:台北市士東國小的個案研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title (題名) | An analysis of organizational behavior: case study of shih-tung elementary school of Taipei city | en_US |
dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (2003). On the Success of Failure: A Reassessment of the Effects of Retention in the Primary Grades (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ariva, T (1987). ‘Centralised’ school based development—A contradiction in terms. In N. Sabar, J. Rudduck, & W. Reid (Eds.), Partnership and autonomy in school-based curriculum development: Policies and practice in Israel and England. Sheffield, UK: Division of Education, University of Sheffield. (pp. 42-50) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ben-Peretz, M., & Dor, B. Z. (1986, April). Thirty years of school-based curriculum developemnt: A case study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document No. ED 274 096) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ben-Peretz, M., & Dor, B. Z. (1986, April). Thirty years of school-based curriculum developemnt: A case study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document No. ED 274 096) | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bezzina, M. (1989). Teachers’ perceptions and their participation in school-based curiculum development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University, Australia. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Burstein, L. (1980). The Analysis of Multi-Level Data in Educational Research and Evaluation. Review of Research in Education, 8, 158-233. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Flamer. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Carter McNamara, MBA, PhD, Authenticity Consulting, LLC. Copyright 1997-2008.Oppland College. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chai, Ching-Hsiung(2001) School Administration:Leadership, Shui-Da-Shui-Yuan Publisher Ltd.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chang, Ching-Shiung(1996), School Organizational Behavior, Wu-Nan Publisher Ltd. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chang, Ching-Shiung(2006), School Organizational Culture and Leadership, Wu-Nan Publisher Ltd. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chen, Yi-Ming(2005),School Business Management and Leadership, Phychology Publisher Ltd.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chiou, H., & Wen, F.-h. (2007). Hierarchical Linear Modeling of Contextual Effects: An Example of Organizational Climate of Creativity at Schools and Teacher`s Creative Performance. Journal of Education & Psychology, 30(1), 1-35. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Columbus, Ohio: Merrill. West, P. T. (1985). Educational public relations. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage Publications. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cutlip, S. M., Broom, G. M., & Center A. H.(1994)Effective public relations(7rd ed.). Engle-wood Cliffs, N. J.:Prentice-Hall . | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cutlip, S.M., & Center, A.H.(1985). Effective public relations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall, Inc.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Duignan, P. (1988). School-based curriculum development: Math or reality. Australian Educational Research, 15(4), 9-21. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fang, Der-Lung(2005), Curriculum Theory and Practice, Li-Wen Culture Ltd.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Godinez, b., Estela (2005). School Connections: U.S. Mexican Youth, Peers, and School Achievement. The Teachers College Record, 107, 2451-2454. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hamilton, D. (1976). Curriculum evaluation. London: Open Books. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hargreaves, A. (1982). The Rhetoric of school-centred innovation. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 14(3), 251-266. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Harrison, M. (1979). Toward empirical based curriculum theory: A participant observation study of school-based curriculum decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Macquarie University. Australia. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Harrison, M. (1981). School-based curriculum decision-making: A personal viewpoint. Curriculum Perspectives, 2(1), 47-52. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Holliday, A. E.(1988). In search of an answer : what is school public relations? Journal of Educational Public Relations,11(2),12-14. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hsieh, Wen-Chuan(2008), Educational Administration, Zhi-Shan Culture Co.Ltd.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hughes, L. W. & Hooper, D. W.(2000). Public relations for school leaders. Boston:Allyn and Bacon. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ke,Kuan-Mei, (2004), Parents Education Participation, Shun-Ding Culture Publisher Ltd. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kennedy, K. J. (1992). School-based curriculum development as a policy for the 1990s: An Australian Perspective. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7(2), 180-195. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kirk, D. (1986). Structure and agency as two problematics in school-based curriculum development: A case study. Australian Journal of Education, 30(3), 285-299. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lee, Ming-Chen.(2007), The Special Editorial of 66th Birthday and 3 Anniversary of Lee-Shing-Lo Completion of Shih-Tung Elementary School, Taipei. Taipei City Shih-Tung Elementary School. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Levine, D.U. & Lezotte, L.W.(1990).Unusually effective schools. Madison: National Center for Effective Schools Research and Development. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lewy, A. (1977). Handbook of curriculum evaluation. New York: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lewy, A. (1977). Handbook of curriculum evaluation. New York: Longman. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lewy, A. (1987). Can teachers produce high quality curriculum material? In N. Sabar, J. Rudduck, & W. Reid (Eds.), Partnership and autonomy in school-based curriculum development: Policies and practice in Israel and England (pp. 84-86). Sheffield, UK: Division of Education, University of Sheffield. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marsh, C., Day, C., Hannay, L., & McGutcheon, G. (1990). Reconceptualizing school-based curriculum development. London: The Falmer Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and Personality, New York:Harper & Row. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Miskel, C. G., Fevurly, R. & Steward, J. (1979). Organizational structures and process, perceived school effectiveness, loyalty, and job satisfaction. Educational | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mott, P. E. (1972). The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper & Row. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Munn, P. (1985). Teacher’s perceptions of school-based curriculum development: Some evidence from multi-disciplinary courses. Scottish Educational Review, 17(2), 82-91. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nevo, D. (1995). School-based evaluation: A dialogue for school improvement. New York: Elsevier Science. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nixon, J. (1992). Evaluating the whole curriculum. Milton Keynes: Open University Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Norris, N. (1990). Understanding educational evaluation. New York: St. Martin’s Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Organizer, 2009 International Conferece on Globalization: Democracy, Institution, and Change, College of Social Science, National Chenchi Universaty,. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lin Pei-hsuan, The Study of the Context of School-Based Curriculum Development, Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, Vol.17, No.2(Sep. 2004)35~56, national taipei teachers college | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prideaux, D. (1993). School-based curriculum development: partial, paradoxical and piecemeal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25(2), 169-178. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Seddon, T., Angus, L., & Poole, M. E. (1990). Pressures on move to school-based decision-making and management. In J. Chapman (Ed.), School-based decision-making and management (pp.29-54). Falmer. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simon , H.A.(1976).Administrative. New York: The Free Press. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simon, H. A.(1960). New science of management decision. New York: Harper & Row. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Skilbeck, M. (1984). School-based curriculum development. London: Harper & Row. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Spaulding, A.&O’Hare, M. J.(2000). Public relations in a communication context: listening, nonverbal and conflict-resolution skills. In T. J. Kowalski(ed.), public relations in school, p138-159. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sturman, A. (1990). Curriculum decision-making at the school level. In J. Chapman (Ed.), School-based decision-making and management (pp.279-297). Falmer. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tiller, T. (1992). Wolf in sheep’s closing. In A. M. Indrebo, L. Monsen, & T. Alvik (Eds.), Theory and practice of school-based evaluation: A research perspective (publication no.77). Lillehammer: | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Todaro,Michael P.(1982), Economic Development in the Third World, Longman Inc., 3rd Printing, 289~327 | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tsai, Pei-Twen(1996), Teacher Career and Grading System, Li-Wen Culture Ltd.. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wu, Shin-Shiung(2000), School Organizational Behavior and Management, W u-Nan Publisher Ltd. | zh_TW |
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zais, R. S. (1976). Curriculum: Principles and foundations. New York: Harper & Row. | zh_TW |