Publications-Theses

題名 有沒有關係有關係?—語意訊息對記憶重組錯誤形成的影響
作者 劉慧美
Huei-Mei Liu
貢獻者 顏乃欣
Nai-Shin Yen
劉慧美
Huei-Mei Liu
關鍵詞 記憶重組錯誤
語意透明度
字頻
詞頻
日期 2002
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 13:11:53 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究以三個實驗來檢驗,當學習和測驗項目之間除了有知覺重疊外,若再加上語意重疊,究竟是會增加參與者成功提取正確回憶的機會,從而降低記憶重組錯誤的發生,還是反而會增加其發生的機會。在實驗一、二中,研究者分別操弄測驗項目的語意透明度與詞頻(實驗一)或字頻(實驗二),發現當測驗項目是組合詞時,和測驗項目為成語詞的情境相較之下,參與者會產生較多記憶重組與特徵錯誤。詞頻和字頻對於記憶重組錯誤的影響則呈現相反的趨勢:高詞頻比低詞頻的測驗項目容易使參與者產生錯誤記憶,但高字頻卻比低字頻的測驗項目更不容易使參與者產生錯誤記憶。由於實驗一和實驗二對於語意重疊與否是透過語意透明度加以操弄,而過去的文獻中顯示,語意透明的組合詞和語意不透明的成語詞,二者在詞義提取的歷程上又有不同,前者會觸動字元的單位,但後者不會,因此,實驗一、二中所觀察到,組合詞比成語詞容易產生重組錯誤的效果,除了增加語意重疊的原因之外,亦有可能是由於二者在心理歷程上的差異所導致。因此,實驗三中使用組合詞作為實驗材料,改為以組成重組項目的單字出現在學習與測驗階段中的字義異同,以在知覺重疊之外操弄語意重疊的有無,結果發現,當組成重組項目的單字出現在學習與測驗階段中代表的意義不相同時,參與者幾乎不會產生記憶重組錯誤。因此,綜合三個實驗的結果來看,當學習與測驗項目間同時具有知覺和語意重疊時,會比當二者間只有知覺重疊時,更容易使得參與者產生記憶重組錯誤。
參考文獻 參考文獻
中文詞知識庫小組(1994)。中文書面語頻率詞典。中央研究院技術報告No.94-01。
中文詞知識庫小組(1995)。注音檢索現代漢語字頻表。中央研究院技術報告No.95-01。
李佳穎(1995)。漢語組合詞與成語詞在心理辭典中的表徵方式。國立中正大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。
沙克特(Schacter, D. L.; 2001/2002)。「記憶七罪」(The seven sins of memory: How the minds forgets and remembers,李明譯)。台北:大塊文化。
高千惠(2001)。語意與連結促發作用對中文字彙辨識的影響。國立政治大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。
梁美雅(1992)。中文組合性詞與成語性詞的辨識歷程。國立清華大學語言學研究所未發表之碩士論文。
陳紹祖(1993)。漢語構詞歷程在閱讀歷程中對語意促發效應的影響。國立中正大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。
黃金蘭(2002)。項目特定與關係性訊息對錯誤記憶的影響。國立台灣大學心理學研究所未發表之博士論文。
Baddley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic, and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362-365.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Bartlett, J. C., & Searcy, J. H. (1998, November). Configural processing and binding in recognition of faces. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas, TX.
Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331-350.
Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P., & Walters, A. A. (1932). An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 73-86.
Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75-84.
Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover.
Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 16, 309-313.
Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory and Cognition, 18, 23-30.
Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1991). Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 19, 617-623.
Gardiner, J. M., & Parkin, A. J. (1990). Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 579-583.
Ghatala, E. S., Levin, J. R., Bell, J. A., Truman, D. L., & Lodico, M. G. (1978). The effect of semantic and nonsemantic factors on the integration of verbal units in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 647-655.
Guttentag, R.E., & Carroll, D.(1994). Identifying the basis for the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Memory, 2, 255-273.
Hirshman, E., Fisher, J., Henthorn, T., Arndt, J., & Passannante, A. (2002). Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 499-516.
Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language: 30, 513-541.
Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., & Solomon, S. K. (1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 203-205.
Jones, T. C., & Atchley, P. (2002). Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: Little evidence for recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 374-379.
Jones, T. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 82-102.
Jones, T. C., Jacoby, L. L., & Gellis, L. A. (2001). Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 131-152.
Joordens, S., & Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1534-1555.
Kroll, N. E. A., Knight, R. T., Metcalfe, J., Wolf, E. S. & Tulving, E. (1996). Cohesion failure as a source of memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 176-196.
Li, C. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrences. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
McDermott, K. B. & Watson, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 160-176.
Melton, A. W., & Irwin, J. M. (1940). The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. American Journal of Psychology, 53, 173-203.
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory and Cognition, 21,89-102.
Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., & Hiraki, K.(2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 294-320.
Reinitz, M. T., & Demb, J. B. (1994). Implicit and explicit memory for compound words. Memory and Cognition, 22, 687-694.
Reinitz, M. T., Lammers, W. J., & Cochran, B. P. (1992). Memory conjunction errors: Miscombination of stored features can produce illusions of memory. Memory and Cognition, 20, 1-11.
Reinitz, M. T., Morrisey, J., & Demb, J. B. (1994). The role of attention in face encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 161-168.
Reinitz, M. T., Verfaellie, M., & Millberg, W. P. (1996). Memory conjunction errors in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 286-299.
Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 123-127.
Roediger, H. L., Welden, M. S., & Challis, B. H., (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A process account. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endal Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rubin, S. R., Van Petten, C., Glisky, E. L., & Newberg, W. M. (1999).Memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Event-related potential and neural psychological data. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 459-488.
Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for Memory: the Brain, the Mind, and the Past. New York: Basic Books.
Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., & Galo, D. A. (1998). Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious processes. Psychological Science, 9, 20-26.
Sulin, R. A., & Dooling, D. J. (1974). Intrusion of a thematic idea in the retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 255-262.
Thomson, D. M., & Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 255-262.
Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of Memory (pp. 381-403). New York: Academic Press.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1-12.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
Underwood, B. J., & Zimmerman, J. (1973). The syllable as a source of error in multisyllable word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 701-706.
Underwood, B. J., Kapelak, S. M., & Malmi, R. A. (1976). Integration of discrete verbal units in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 293-300.
Underwood, J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129.
Wagner, A. D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). On the relationship between recognition familiarity and perceptual fluency: Evidence for distinct mnemonic processes. Acta Psychologica, 98, 211-230.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition, 25, 747-763.
Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I., Lazara, M., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver characteristic data. Neuropsychology, 12, 323-339.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學研究所
88752008
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088752008
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 顏乃欣zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Nai-Shin Yenen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 劉慧美zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Huei-Mei Liuen_US
dc.creator (作者) 劉慧美zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Huei-Mei Liuen_US
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 13:11:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 13:11:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 13:11:53 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0088752008en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32468-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 心理學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 88752008zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究以三個實驗來檢驗,當學習和測驗項目之間除了有知覺重疊外,若再加上語意重疊,究竟是會增加參與者成功提取正確回憶的機會,從而降低記憶重組錯誤的發生,還是反而會增加其發生的機會。在實驗一、二中,研究者分別操弄測驗項目的語意透明度與詞頻(實驗一)或字頻(實驗二),發現當測驗項目是組合詞時,和測驗項目為成語詞的情境相較之下,參與者會產生較多記憶重組與特徵錯誤。詞頻和字頻對於記憶重組錯誤的影響則呈現相反的趨勢:高詞頻比低詞頻的測驗項目容易使參與者產生錯誤記憶,但高字頻卻比低字頻的測驗項目更不容易使參與者產生錯誤記憶。由於實驗一和實驗二對於語意重疊與否是透過語意透明度加以操弄,而過去的文獻中顯示,語意透明的組合詞和語意不透明的成語詞,二者在詞義提取的歷程上又有不同,前者會觸動字元的單位,但後者不會,因此,實驗一、二中所觀察到,組合詞比成語詞容易產生重組錯誤的效果,除了增加語意重疊的原因之外,亦有可能是由於二者在心理歷程上的差異所導致。因此,實驗三中使用組合詞作為實驗材料,改為以組成重組項目的單字出現在學習與測驗階段中的字義異同,以在知覺重疊之外操弄語意重疊的有無,結果發現,當組成重組項目的單字出現在學習與測驗階段中代表的意義不相同時,參與者幾乎不會產生記憶重組錯誤。因此,綜合三個實驗的結果來看,當學習與測驗項目間同時具有知覺和語意重疊時,會比當二者間只有知覺重疊時,更容易使得參與者產生記憶重組錯誤。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 總 目 錄

緒論 1
記憶扭曲(memory distortion)的現象 1
語意關聯(semantic relatedness)所造成的記憶扭曲 2
記憶重組錯誤(memory conjunction errors) 4
解釋記憶重組錯誤的理論取向 5
語文材料中,影響記憶重組錯誤的語意和非語意因素 8
研究目的 11
兩種相反的預測 11
區辨實驗材料的語意透明度(semantic transparency) 13
本研究中的三個實驗 16
實驗一 21
方法 22
結果 26
討論 32
實驗二 35
方法 36
結果 37
討論 44
實驗三 47
方法 48
結果 49
討論 56
綜合討論 59
增加語意透明度的效果 59
詞頻與字頻的效果 63
研究限制與建議 64
參考文獻 66
附 錄 71


表 次 目 錄

表一:不同解釋方式對增加語意重疊所可能產生的效果預測………19
表二:實驗一所操弄的變項效果假設預測……………………………22
表三:實驗一中各組平均再認率及其標準差…………………………26
表四:實驗一中校正後各組平均再認率………………………………28
表五:實驗一中各組平均記得/知道反應率………………………….30
表六:實驗二所操弄的變項效果假設預測……………………………35
表七:實驗二中各組平均再認率及其標準差…………………………37
表八:實驗二中校正後各組平均再認率………………………………39
表九:實驗二中各組平均記得/知道反應率………………………….41
表十:實驗三中各組校正前與校正後之平均再認率…………………51
表十一:實驗三中各組校正前與校正後之平均記得/知道反應率…53


圖 次 目 錄

圖一:實驗一中各組平均再認率圖示………………………………27
圖二:實驗一中各組校正後之平均再認率圖示……………………29
圖三:實驗一中各組平均記得反應率圖示…………………………31
圖四:實驗一中各組平均知道反應率圖示…………………………31
圖五:實驗二中各組平均再認率圖示………………………………37
圖六:實驗二中各組校正後之平均再認率圖示……………………40
圖七:實驗二中各組平均記得反應率圖示…………………………42
圖八:實驗二中各組平均知道反應率圖示…………………………43
圖九:實驗三中各組平均再認率圖示………………………………50
圖十:實驗三中各組校正後之平均再認率圖示……………………50
圖十一:實驗三中,字義異同與反應種類的交互作用……………52
圖十二:實驗三中,字頻與反應種類的交互作用…………………52
圖十三:實驗三中各組校正後之平均記得反應率圖示……………54
圖十四:實驗三中各組校正後之平均知道反應率圖示……………54


附 錄 次 目 錄

附錄一:Jones與Atchley (2002)所使用的刺激材料………72
附錄二:Reinitz與Demb (1994)所使用的刺激材料………74
附錄三:實驗一所使用的刺激材料…………………………75
附錄四:實驗二所使用的刺激材料…………………………76
附錄五:實驗三所使用的刺激材料…………………………77
附錄六:中文雙字詞成語性評量指導語……………………78
附錄七:中文雙字詞字義相似性評量指導語………………79
附錄八:實驗同意書…………………………………………80
附錄九:實驗事後問卷………………………………………81
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 39366 bytes-
dc.format.extent 41910 bytes-
dc.format.extent 48924 bytes-
dc.format.extent 67448 bytes-
dc.format.extent 72219 bytes-
dc.format.extent 85996 bytes-
dc.format.extent 81307 bytes-
dc.format.extent 80101 bytes-
dc.format.extent 56952 bytes-
dc.format.extent 54429 bytes-
dc.format.extent 82358 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088752008en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 記憶重組錯誤zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 語意透明度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 字頻zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 詞頻zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 有沒有關係有關係?—語意訊息對記憶重組錯誤形成的影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 參考文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文詞知識庫小組(1994)。中文書面語頻率詞典。中央研究院技術報告No.94-01。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文詞知識庫小組(1995)。注音檢索現代漢語字頻表。中央研究院技術報告No.95-01。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李佳穎(1995)。漢語組合詞與成語詞在心理辭典中的表徵方式。國立中正大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沙克特(Schacter, D. L.; 2001/2002)。「記憶七罪」(The seven sins of memory: How the minds forgets and remembers,李明譯)。台北:大塊文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高千惠(2001)。語意與連結促發作用對中文字彙辨識的影響。國立政治大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梁美雅(1992)。中文組合性詞與成語性詞的辨識歷程。國立清華大學語言學研究所未發表之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳紹祖(1993)。漢語構詞歷程在閱讀歷程中對語意促發效應的影響。國立中正大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃金蘭(2002)。項目特定與關係性訊息對錯誤記憶的影響。國立台灣大學心理學研究所未發表之博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baddley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic, and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362-365.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bartlett, J. C., & Searcy, J. H. (1998, November). Configural processing and binding in recognition of faces. Paper presented at the 39th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Dallas, TX.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1971). The abstraction of linguistic ideas. Cognitive Psychology, 2, 331-350.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carmichael, L., Hogan, H. P., & Walters, A. A. (1932). An experimental study of the effect of language on the reproduction of visually perceived form. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15, 73-86.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75-84.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 16, 309-313.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory and Cognition, 18, 23-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gardiner, J. M., & Java, R. I. (1991). Forgetting in recognition memory with and without recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 19, 617-623.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gardiner, J. M., & Parkin, A. J. (1990). Attention and recollective experience in recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 579-583.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ghatala, E. S., Levin, J. R., Bell, J. A., Truman, D. L., & Lodico, M. G. (1978). The effect of semantic and nonsemantic factors on the integration of verbal units in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language: Human Learning and Memory, 4(6), 647-655.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guttentag, R.E., & Carroll, D.(1994). Identifying the basis for the word frequency effect in recognition memory. Memory, 2, 255-273.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hirshman, E., Fisher, J., Henthorn, T., Arndt, J., & Passannante, A. (2002). Midazolam amnesia and dual-process models of the word-frequency mirror effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 499-516.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language: 30, 513-541.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, M. K., Bransford, J. D., & Solomon, S. K. (1973). Memory for tacit implications of sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 203-205.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, T. C., & Atchley, P. (2002). Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: Little evidence for recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 374-379.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, T. C., & Jacoby, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 82-102.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, T. C., Jacoby, L. L., & Gellis, L. A. (2001). Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 131-152.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Joordens, S., & Hockley, W. E. (2000). Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1534-1555.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kroll, N. E. A., Knight, R. T., Metcalfe, J., Wolf, E. S. & Tulving, E. (1996). Cohesion failure as a source of memory illusions. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 176-196.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Li, C. & Thompson, S. A. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrences. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L. K., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McDermott, K. B. & Watson, J. M. (2001). The rise and fall of false recall: The impact of presentation duration. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 160-176.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Melton, A. W., & Irwin, J. M. (1940). The influence of degree of interpolated learning on retroactive inhibition and the overt transfer of specific responses. American Journal of Psychology, 53, 173-203.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory and Cognition, 21,89-102.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Schunn, C. D., Ayers, M. S., Angstadt, P., & Hiraki, K.(2000). A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 294-320.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reinitz, M. T., & Demb, J. B. (1994). Implicit and explicit memory for compound words. Memory and Cognition, 22, 687-694.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reinitz, M. T., Lammers, W. J., & Cochran, B. P. (1992). Memory conjunction errors: Miscombination of stored features can produce illusions of memory. Memory and Cognition, 20, 1-11.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reinitz, M. T., Morrisey, J., & Demb, J. B. (1994). The role of attention in face encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 161-168.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reinitz, M. T., Verfaellie, M., & Millberg, W. P. (1996). Memory conjunction errors in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 286-299.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Roediger, H. L. III, & McDermott, K. B. (2000). Tricks of memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 123-127.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Roediger, H. L., Welden, M. S., & Challis, B. H., (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A process account. In H. L. Roediger & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in Honor of Endal Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rubin, S. R., Van Petten, C., Glisky, E. L., & Newberg, W. M. (1999).Memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Event-related potential and neural psychological data. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 459-488.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for Memory: the Brain, the Mind, and the Past. New York: Basic Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., & Galo, D. A. (1998). Creating false memories of words with or without recognition of list items: Evidence for nonconscious processes. Psychological Science, 9, 20-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sulin, R. A., & Dooling, D. J. (1974). Intrusion of a thematic idea in the retention of prose. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 255-262.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thomson, D. M., & Tulving, E. (1970). Associative encoding and retrieval: Weak and strong cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 86, 255-262.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of Memory (pp. 381-403). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 26, 1-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Underwood, B. J., & Zimmerman, J. (1973). The syllable as a source of error in multisyllable word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 701-706.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Underwood, B. J., Kapelak, S. M., & Malmi, R. A. (1976). Integration of discrete verbal units in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 293-300.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Underwood, J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wagner, A. D., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1998). On the relationship between recognition familiarity and perceptual fluency: Evidence for distinct mnemonic processes. Acta Psychologica, 98, 211-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yonelinas, A. P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yonelinas, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: the contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition, 25, 747-763.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yonelinas, A. P., Kroll, N. E. A., Dobbins, I., Lazara, M., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver characteristic data. Neuropsychology, 12, 323-339.zh_TW