Publications-Theses

題名 從事件自我相關程度探討訊息呈現方式對風險知覺之影響
作者 廖楷民
Liao, Kai-min
貢獻者 顏乃欣
Yen, Nai-Shing
廖楷民
Liao, Kai-min
關鍵詞 頻率或機率方式呈現訊息
事件自我相關程度
推敲可能性模式
風險知覺
日期 2006
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 13:21:56 (UTC+8)
摘要 以機率或頻率方式呈現訊息對風險知覺評估的影響,過去的研究有不一致的結果,原因可能來自於判斷事件與受試者的自我相關程度不同,而引發捷思或系統性的訊息處理歷程。實驗一發現當事件的自我相關程度高,受試者會採用系統性的認知處理,而事件的自我相關程度低時,受試者會採用捷思性的認知處理。實驗二詢問受試者認為以機率或頻率方式呈現訊息何者較清楚明確,結果發現有77.5%的受試者認為以頻率方式呈現訊息較以機率方式呈現訊息清楚明確。實驗三操弄「事件自我相關程度」與「機率或頻率方式呈現訊息」,結果發現當事件為高自我相關時,機率或頻率方式呈現訊息在風險知覺的判斷上沒有差異;而當事件為低自我相關時,則頻率方式呈現訊息的「風險知覺」與「事件聯想負向詞數量」均大於機率方式呈現訊息。另外,當事件為低自我相關時,訊息明確度與事件聯想負向詞數量對風險知覺有顯著的預測力。以上的結果支持不同事件自我相關程度會引發捷思或系統性訊息處理,而頻率方式呈現訊息較機率方式呈現訊息清楚明確的原因,與Slovic等人(2000)提出頻率較具體,容易想像的推論符合,但不支持Gigerenzer和Edwards (2003)認為機率的參照類別不清楚的假設。此外,自我相關程度與可得性捷思為影響頻率或機率方式呈現訊息對風險知覺判斷結果不一致的重要變項。
參考文獻 Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
Chattopadhyay, A. (1998). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Covey, J., Matthews, E., & Pill, R. (2001). Presenting risk information - A review of the effects of "framing`` and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 6(1), 61-82.
Fetting, J. H., Siminoff, L. A., Piantadosi, S., Abeloff, M. D., Damron, D. J., & Sarsfield, A. M. (1990). Effect of patients` expectations of benefit with standard breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy on participation in a randomized clinical trial: A clinical vignette study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 8(9), 1476-1482.
Fischhoff, B. (1996). The real world: What good is it? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 232-248.
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). The psychology of good judgment: Frequency formats and simple algorithms. Medical Decision Making, 16(3), 273-280.
Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Insight. In G. Gigerenzer (Ed.), Calculated risks: How to know when numbers deceive you (pp. 39-51). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Gigerenzer, G., & Edwards, A. (2003). Simple tools for understanding risk: From innumeracy to insight. British Medical Journal, 327, 741-744.
Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Broek, E. v. d., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). "A 30% chance of rain tomorrow": How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis, 25(3), 623-629.
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbolting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98(4), 506-528.
Gorn, G. J. (1982). The effects of music in advertising on choice behavior: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 94-101.
Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). New York: Academic Press.
Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. (1999). A proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventative behaviors. Environmental Research, 80, 230-245.
Han, P. K. J., Moser, R. P., & Klein, W. M. P. (2006). Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: Relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 51-69.
Hellesoy, O., Gronhaug, K., & Kvitastein, O. (1998). Profiling the high hazard perceivers: A exploratory study. Risk Analysis, 18, 253-359.
Johnson, R. J., McCaul, K. D., & Klein, W. M. (2002). Risk involvement and risk perception among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25(1), 67-82.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
Kan, S., Hongxia, F., Jianming, J., Wendong, L., Zhaoli, S., Jing, G., et al. (2003). The risk perceptioins of SARS and socio-psychological behaviors of urban people in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(4), 546-554.
Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 26(3), 631-639.
Kuhn, K. M. (1997). Communicating uncertainty: Framing effects on responses to vague probabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(1), 55-83.
Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551-578.
McGuire, W. J. (1968). Personality and attitude change: An information processing theory. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 171-196). New York: Academic Press.
Monahan, J., Heilbrun, K., Silver, E., Nabors, E., Bone, J., & Slovic, P. (2002). Communicating violence risk: Frequency formats, vivid outcomes, and forensic settings. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(2), 121-126.
Myers, J. R., Henderson-King, D. H., & Henderson-King, E. I. (1997). Facing technological risks: The importance of individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 1-20.
Natter, H. M., & Berry, D. C. (2005). Effects of active information processing on the understanding of risk information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 123-135.
O`Connor, A. (2003, October 7). Finding the fact: Myth about lung cancer can be deadly. Noew York Times.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 83-131.
Peters, E., McCaul, K. D., Stefanek, M., & Nelson, W. (2006). A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: Contributions from judgment and decision-making research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31(1), 45-52.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668-672.
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.
Purchase, I. F. H., & Slovic, P. (1999). Quantitative risk assessment breeds fear. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 5(3), 445-453.
Rook, K. S. (1987). Effects of case history versus abstract information on health attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(6), 533-553.
Ropeik, D. (2002, 20 Oct.). Be afraid of being very afraid. Washingtonpost, p. 1.
Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(5), 408-433.
Rothman, A. J., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053-1064.
Sarfati, D., Howden-Chapman, P., & Woodward, S. C. (1998). Does the frame affect the picture? A study into how attitudes to screening for cancer are affected by the way benefits are expressed. Journal of Medical Screening, 5, 137-140.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social Judgment: Assimilation, and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT,: Yale University Press.
Slovic, P. (1992). Perceptions of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 117-152). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689-701.
Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311-322.
Slovic, P., Fishchhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982a). Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 463-489). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Slovic, P., Fishchhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982b). Why study risk perception? Risk Analysis, 2, 83-93.
Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D. G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24(3), 271-296.
Spielberg, S. (Writer) (1975). Jaws. In R. D. Zanuck & D. Brown (Producer). United States: Universal Pictures.
Szalay, L. B., & Deese, J. (1978). Subjective meaning and culture: An assessment through word associations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 221(453-458).
Welkenhuysen, M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., & d`Ydewalle, G. (2001). The language of uncertainty in genetic risk communication: framing and verbal versus numerical information. Patient Education and Counseling, 43(2), 179-187.
Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(6), 495-506.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
心理學研究所
92752004
95
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0927520041
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 顏乃欣zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Yen, Nai-Shingen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 廖楷民zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Liao, Kai-minen_US
dc.creator (作者) 廖楷民zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Liao, Kai-minen_US
dc.date (日期) 2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 13:21:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 13:21:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 13:21:56 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0927520041en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32537-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 心理學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92752004zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 以機率或頻率方式呈現訊息對風險知覺評估的影響,過去的研究有不一致的結果,原因可能來自於判斷事件與受試者的自我相關程度不同,而引發捷思或系統性的訊息處理歷程。實驗一發現當事件的自我相關程度高,受試者會採用系統性的認知處理,而事件的自我相關程度低時,受試者會採用捷思性的認知處理。實驗二詢問受試者認為以機率或頻率方式呈現訊息何者較清楚明確,結果發現有77.5%的受試者認為以頻率方式呈現訊息較以機率方式呈現訊息清楚明確。實驗三操弄「事件自我相關程度」與「機率或頻率方式呈現訊息」,結果發現當事件為高自我相關時,機率或頻率方式呈現訊息在風險知覺的判斷上沒有差異;而當事件為低自我相關時,則頻率方式呈現訊息的「風險知覺」與「事件聯想負向詞數量」均大於機率方式呈現訊息。另外,當事件為低自我相關時,訊息明確度與事件聯想負向詞數量對風險知覺有顯著的預測力。以上的結果支持不同事件自我相關程度會引發捷思或系統性訊息處理,而頻率方式呈現訊息較機率方式呈現訊息清楚明確的原因,與Slovic等人(2000)提出頻率較具體,容易想像的推論符合,但不支持Gigerenzer和Edwards (2003)認為機率的參照類別不清楚的假設。此外,自我相關程度與可得性捷思為影響頻率或機率方式呈現訊息對風險知覺判斷結果不一致的重要變項。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 緒論 1
文獻探討 2
訊息呈現方式對風險知覺的影響 2
框架效果 3
頻率或機率的呈現方式 4
可得性捷思法與風險知覺 7
情感對風險知覺的影響 10
個別差異與風險知覺 11
事件自我相關程度與風險知覺 11
自我相關事件的認知處理歷程 13
捷思-系統性模式(Heuristic-System Model, HSM) 13
推敲可能性模式(Elaboration- Likelihood Model, ELM) 15
研究假設 17
前測 18
實驗一 20
實驗二 25
實驗三 28
綜合討論 36
參考文獻 41
附件一 47
附件二 63
附件三 67
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 47966 bytes-
dc.format.extent 75777 bytes-
dc.format.extent 96632 bytes-
dc.format.extent 168382 bytes-
dc.format.extent 605504 bytes-
dc.format.extent 167947 bytes-
dc.format.extent 310042 bytes-
dc.format.extent 389480 bytes-
dc.format.extent 322050 bytes-
dc.format.extent 409176 bytes-
dc.format.extent 282502 bytes-
dc.format.extent 80293 bytes-
dc.format.extent 186484 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0927520041en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 頻率或機率方式呈現訊息zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 事件自我相關程度zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 推敲可能性模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 風險知覺zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 從事件自我相關程度探討訊息呈現方式對風險知覺之影響zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic Versus Systematic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chattopadhyay, A. (1998). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 460-473.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edwards, A., Elwyn, G., Covey, J., Matthews, E., & Pill, R. (2001). Presenting risk information - A review of the effects of "framing`` and other manipulations on patient outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 6(1), 61-82.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fetting, J. H., Siminoff, L. A., Piantadosi, S., Abeloff, M. D., Damron, D. J., & Sarsfield, A. M. (1990). Effect of patients` expectations of benefit with standard breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy on participation in a randomized clinical trial: A clinical vignette study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 8(9), 1476-1482.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fischhoff, B. (1996). The real world: What good is it? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 232-248.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gigerenzer, G. (1996). The psychology of good judgment: Frequency formats and simple algorithms. Medical Decision Making, 16(3), 273-280.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Insight. In G. Gigerenzer (Ed.), Calculated risks: How to know when numbers deceive you (pp. 39-51). New York: Simon & Schuster.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gigerenzer, G., & Edwards, A. (2003). Simple tools for understanding risk: From innumeracy to insight. British Medical Journal, 327, 741-744.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Broek, E. v. d., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). "A 30% chance of rain tomorrow": How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis, 25(3), 623-629.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbolting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98(4), 506-528.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gorn, G. J. (1982). The effects of music in advertising on choice behavior: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of Marketing, 46(1), 94-101.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147-170). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S., & Neuwirth, K. (1999). A proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventative behaviors. Environmental Research, 80, 230-245.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Han, P. K. J., Moser, R. P., & Klein, W. M. P. (2006). Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: Relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry. Journal of Health Communication, 11, 51-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hellesoy, O., Gronhaug, K., & Kvitastein, O. (1998). Profiling the high hazard perceivers: A exploratory study. Risk Analysis, 18, 253-359.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, R. J., McCaul, K. D., & Klein, W. M. (2002). Risk involvement and risk perception among adolescents and young adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 25(1), 67-82.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kan, S., Hongxia, F., Jianming, J., Wendong, L., Zhaoli, S., Jing, G., et al. (2003). The risk perceptioins of SARS and socio-psychological behaviors of urban people in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35(4), 546-554.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 26(3), 631-639.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kuhn, K. M. (1997). Communicating uncertainty: Framing effects on responses to vague probabilities. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(1), 55-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551-578.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McGuire, W. J. (1968). Personality and attitude change: An information processing theory. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 171-196). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Monahan, J., Heilbrun, K., Silver, E., Nabors, E., Bone, J., & Slovic, P. (2002). Communicating violence risk: Frequency formats, vivid outcomes, and forensic settings. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(2), 121-126.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myers, J. R., Henderson-King, D. H., & Henderson-King, E. I. (1997). Facing technological risks: The importance of individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 1-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Natter, H. M., & Berry, D. C. (2005). Effects of active information processing on the understanding of risk information. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 123-135.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O`Connor, A. (2003, October 7). Finding the fact: Myth about lung cancer can be deadly. Noew York Times.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1992). Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 83-131.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peters, E., McCaul, K. D., Stefanek, M., & Nelson, W. (2006). A heuristics approach to understanding cancer risk perception: Contributions from judgment and decision-making research. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 31(1), 45-52.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: W. C. Brown.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668-672.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Purchase, I. F. H., & Slovic, P. (1999). Quantitative risk assessment breeds fear. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 5(3), 445-453.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rook, K. S. (1987). Effects of case history versus abstract information on health attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17(6), 533-553.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ropeik, D. (2002, 20 Oct.). Be afraid of being very afraid. Washingtonpost, p. 1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. D. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29(5), 408-433.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rothman, A. J., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Constructing perceptions of vulnerability: Personal relevance and the use of experiential information in health judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1053-1064.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sarfati, D., Howden-Chapman, P., & Woodward, S. C. (1998). Does the frame affect the picture? A study into how attitudes to screening for cancer are affected by the way benefits are expressed. Journal of Medical Screening, 5, 137-140.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social Judgment: Assimilation, and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change. New Haven, CT,: Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Slovic, P. (1992). Perceptions of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In S. Krimsky & D. Golding (Eds.), Social theories of risk (pp. 117-152). Westport, CT: Praeger.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the battlefield. Risk Analysis, 19(4), 689-701.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311-322.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Slovic, P., Fishchhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982a). Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 463-489). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Slovic, P., Fishchhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982b). Why study risk perception? Risk Analysis, 2, 83-93.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Slovic, P., Monahan, J., & MacGregor, D. G. (2000). Violence risk assessment and risk communication: The effects of using actual cases, providing instruction, and employing probability versus frequency formats. Law and Human Behavior, 24(3), 271-296.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spielberg, S. (Writer) (1975). Jaws. In R. D. Zanuck & D. Brown (Producer). United States: Universal Pictures.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Szalay, L. B., & Deese, J. (1978). Subjective meaning and culture: An assessment through word associations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the rationality of choice. Science, 221(453-458).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Welkenhuysen, M., Evers-Kiebooms, G., & d`Ydewalle, G. (2001). The language of uncertainty in genetic risk communication: framing and verbal versus numerical information. Patient Education and Counseling, 43(2), 179-187.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yamagishi, K. (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11(6), 495-506.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW