| dc.contributor.advisor | 許文耀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 陳盈旬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Chen, Ying Xun | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 陳盈旬 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chen, Ying Xun | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 13:23:12 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 13:23:12 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 13:23:12 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0927520181 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32547 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 92752018 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 近年來校園暴力日趨嚴重，許多研究者對此問題欲深入探討及分析。學者Dodge & Coie(1987)提出自發式攻擊及反應式攻擊作為瞭解攻擊行為的向度，且理論成因跟社會適應的表現有所不同，然而國內缺乏針對攻擊類型的研究與中文攻擊行為評估量表。因此本研究試圖透過翻譯及驗證Little & Jones等人(2003)所發展之模型與攻擊行為評估量表，以期使國內引入攻擊類型分類的模型，並使評估少年攻擊行為時能夠更精準。
翻譯的攻擊行為評估量表，將攻擊行為依照攻擊形式與攻擊功能分成六個分量表，分別是：純粹的外顯攻擊、反應式外顯攻擊、工具式外顯攻擊、純粹的關係攻擊、反應式關係攻擊、工具式關係攻擊；因此本量表既能夠評估外顯與關係攻擊，亦能夠評估工具式與反應式攻擊。
研究者以361名國中學生作為受試者，以自陳問卷蒐集所需資訊，效度驗證除了以SEM進行模型適配度分析之外，另以人際互動、負向情緒、敵意歸因與結果預期作為效標變項，進行效標關連效度之考驗。研究結果顯示此中文攻擊行為評估量表具有良好的效度。
在效度驗證之外，本研究尚進一步討論攻擊形式與功能對於上述四個效標變項的解釋力，結果發現在工具性挑釁情境中，只有攻擊功能對效標具有顯著的解釋力；而在關係挑釁情境中，攻擊形式與功能均對效標有顯著解釋力。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Because violence in the campus becomes more and more serious in recent years, many reserachers want to study and analyse this probem. Dodge & Coie(1987) found theoretical and social adaptive distinction by dividing aggression into proactive aggression and reactive aggression. However, there are few studies in Taiwan and there is no the Chinese aggressive scale which is divided aggression into proactive(instrumental) aggression and reactive aggression. This research attempts to use Little et al.’s (2003) Model and to translate their aggressive scale into Chinese. With Little et al.’s Model and Chinese aggressive scale , it will be more accurate in assessing adolescent aggressive behavior.<br>According to form and function, the translated aggressive scale divides aggression into six subscales, which including: pure overt aggression, instrumental overt aggression, reactive overt aggression, pure relational aggression, instrumental relational aggression, reactive relational aggression. The aggressive scale not only can assess overt and relational aggression, but also can assess instrumental and reactive aggression.<br>The 361 research subjects were junior high school students. Necessary information was collected by using self- rated questionnaire. In order to examine the validity of the aggressive scale, this research not only evaluated model fit with SEM but also examined criterion-related validity of aggressive scale and the criterion are interpersonal index, negative emotion, hostility, and outcome expectance. The results showed the aggressive scale have appropriate validity.<br>Besides testing validity, this research further discussed if the four criterion could be explained by the form and function of aggression .The results showed the criterions in the instrumental provocative situation can be explained only by the function of aggression. However, the criterions in the relational provocative situation can be explanted by both the form and function of aggression. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機與目的 1第二節 名詞解釋 7第二章 文獻探討 10第一節 攻擊行為的定義與分類 10第二節 攻擊的功能—反應式/自發式攻擊 15第三節 攻擊的形式—外顯攻擊與關係攻擊 23第四節 從攻擊型式與功能評估攻擊行為—Little & Jones等人(2003)的假設模式 29第五節 研究問題與假設—驗證Little等人(2003)提出的攻擊形式與功能之結構關係 34第三章 研究方法 40第一節 實施程序 40第二節 研究對象 42第三節 研究工具 43第四章 研究結果 48第一節 檢驗攻擊行為評估量表的建構效度 48第二節 攻擊行為評估量表的效標關連效度 52第三節 攻擊形式與功能對心理社會適應的影響 61第五章 討論 65第一節 攻擊行為評估量表建構效度的討論 65第二節 攻擊行為評估量表效標關連效度的討論 66第三節 攻擊形式與功能對心理社會適應影響的討論 71第六章 結論與建議 74第一節 結論與研究貢獻 74第二節 研究限制與建議 76 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 56974 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 285051 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 287214 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 355488 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 306501 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 750770 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 405563 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 513767 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 301004 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 291618 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 297909 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 380366 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0927520181 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 工具式攻擊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 反應式攻擊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 關係攻擊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 外顯攻擊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 攻擊量表 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | instrumental aggression | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | reactive aggression | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | relational aggression | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | overt aggression | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | aggressive scale | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 少年攻擊評估量表之信、效度研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | The Reliability and validity of the aggressive scale in adolescents | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王明傳、雷庚玲（2008）。華人青少年前期兒童之間接攻擊行為的反應評鑑與情緒經驗。中華心理學刊，50(1)，71-90。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林淑菁（2005）。國小高年級學生的關係性攻擊及外顯性攻擊與其友誼關係之研究。國立台中師範學院諮商與教育心理研究所碩士論文，未出版，台中市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳淑芳（2006）。國外量表之兩階段翻譯及信、效度測試。護理雜誌，53(1)，65-71。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱似齡（2007）。同理心對少年暴力行為區辨效力之研究。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 邱皓政（2004）。結構方程模式：LISREL的理論、技術與應用。台北。雙葉書廊有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 莊季靜（2006）。國中學生同儕攻擊者之社會訊息處理歷程研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部九十三年各級學校校園事件統計分析報告（94）。台北市。教育部校園安全暨災害防救通報處理中心。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 教育部九十四年各級學校校園事件統計分析報告（95）。台北市。教育部校園安全暨災害防救通報處理中心。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃芳銘（2006）。結構方程模式：理論與應用。台北。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃囇莉（2005）。人際關係與人際衝突。華人本土心理學，521-114。台北遠流出版公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張春興（1998）。現代心理學。台北。東華。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張春興（2000）。張氏心理學辭典。台北。東華。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張淑綺（2000）。我是誰？青少年的再現----以平面媒體為例。輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張黛眉（1990）。影響小學學童攻擊行為以致社交地位之認知相關變項。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 葉北辰（2006）。國小學童對同儕間負向言語之反應。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡松瑜（2003）。國中生父母教養知覺、家庭生活適應與偏差行為之關係研究。國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭宇彣（2003）。與父母分離-個體化、貴人經驗與國中生的人我知覺、人際互動模式之關係研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 藍珮君（2006）。國中女生關係攻擊行為及意圖歸因、友誼品質、自我概念之相關研究。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291-322. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Arsenio, W. F., Cooperman, S., & Lover, A.(2000). Affective predictors of preschoolers` aggression and peer acceptance: direct and indirect effects. Developmental psychology, 36(4), 438-448. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Arsenio, W. F., Gold, J., & Adams, E. (2004a). Adolescents` emotion expectancies regarding aggressive and nonaggressive events: Connections with behavior problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89(4), 338-355. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Arsenio, W. F., & Lemerise, E. A (2004b). Aggression and moral development: Integrating social information processing and moral domain models. Child Development. 75(4), 987-1002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bailey, C. A., & Ostrov, J.M. (2007). Differentiating forms and functions of aggression in emerging adults: associations with hostile attribution biases and normative beliefs. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(6), 713-722. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Berkowitz, L. (1988). Frustrations, Appraisals, and Aversively Stimulated Aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 3-11. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bjorkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukianinen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight?Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior,18, 117-127. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Is it time to pull the plug on the hostile versus instrumental aggression dichotomy. Psychological Review, 108(1), 273-279. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Buss, A. H. (1961). The Psychology of Aggression. New York：Wiley. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(2), 186-197. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Card N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(5), 466-480, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Coie, J.D., & Dodge, K.A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development (Vol. 3, pp. 779–862). Toronto: Wiley. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., Terry, R., & Wright, V. (1991). The role of aggression in peer relations: an analysis of aggression episodes in boys` play groups. Child Development, 62(4), 812-826. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Connor, D. F. (2004). Aggression and Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents: Research and Treatment. New York: The Guilford Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Connor, D. F., Steingard, R. J., Cunningham, J. A., Anderson, J. J., & Melloni, R. H. (2004). Proactive and reactive aggression in referred children and adolescents. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 74(2), 129-136. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crain, M. M., Finch, C. L., & Foster, S. L. (2005). The relevance of the social information processing model for understanding relational aggression in girls. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 51(2), 213-249. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crick, N. R. (1996). The role of relational aggression, overt aggression and prosocail behavior in the prediction on children’s future social adjustment. Child Development, 67, 2317-2327. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993-1002. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crick, N. R., Grotpeter, J. K., & Bigbee, M. A. (2002). Relationally and physically aggressive children’s intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations. Child Development, 73(4), 1134-1142. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | De Castro, B. O., Merk, W., Koops, W., Veerman, J. W., & Bosch, J. D. (2005). Emotions in social information processing and their relations with reactive and proactive aggression in referred aggressive boys. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(1), 105-116. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children`s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146-1158. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dollar, J., Doob, L.W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O.H., & Sears, R.R. (1939). Frustration and Aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Feshbach, S. ( 1970). Aggression. In: Mussen (E.d.), Carmichael`s manual of child psychology. Wiley; New York: pp. 159–259. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fite, P. J., Stauffacher, K.,Ostrov, J. O., & Colder, C. R. (2008). Replication and extension of Little et al.’s (2003) forms and functions of aggression measure. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(3), 238-242. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Grotpeter, J. K., & Crick, N. R. (1996). Relational aggression, overt aggression, and friendship. Child Development, 67(5), 2328-2338. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hartup, W. W. (1974). Aggression in childhood: Developmental perspectives. American Psychologist, 29, 336-341. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hubbard, J. A., Smithmyer, C. M., Ramsden, S. R., Parker, E. H., Flanagan, K. D., Dearing, K. F., Relyea, N., & Simons, R. F. (2002). Observational, physiological, and self-report measures of children`s anger: Relations to reactive versus proactive aggression. Child Development, 73(4), 1101-1118. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kempes, M., Matthys, W., de Vries, H., & van Engeland, H. (2005). Reactive and proactive aggression in children: A review of theory, findings and the relevance for child and adolescent psychiatry. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 14(1), 11-19. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Liu, J. (2004). Concept analysis: Aggression. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 25(7), 693-714. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Loeber, R., & Hay, D. (1997). Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to early adulthood. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 371-410. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Loeber, R., & Schmaling, K. B. (1985). Empirical evidence for overt and covert patterns of antisocial conduct problems: A metaanalysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 13(2), 337-353. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Little, T. D., Brauner, J., Jones, S. M., Nock, M. K., & Hawley, P. H. (2003). Rethinking aggression: A typological examination of the functions of aggression . Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 343–369 . | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Little, T. D., Jones, S. M., Henrich, C. C., & Hawley, P. H. (2003). Disentangling the "whys" from the "whats" of aggressive behaviour . International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 122–133. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marsee, M. A., & Frick, P. J. (2007). Exploring the cognitive and emotional correlates to proactive and reactive aggression in a sample of detained girls. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(6), 969-981. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mayberry, M. L., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Associations among empathy, social competence & reactive/proactive aggression subtypes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(6), 787-798. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McAuliffe, M. D., Hubbard, J. A., Rubin, R. M., Morrow, M. T., & Dearing, K. F. (2007). Reactive and proactive aggression: Stability of constructs and relations to correlates. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 167(4), 365–382. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Miller, J. D., & Lynam, D. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41,1469-1480. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Polman, H., de Castro, B. O., Koops, W., van Boxtel, H. W., & Merk, W. W. (2007). A meta-analysis of the distinction between reactive and proactive aggression in children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(4), 522-535. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 310-342. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). Reactive and proactive aggression: Evidence of a two-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 12, 115-122. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pulkkinen L. (1996). Proactive and reactive aggression in early adolescence as precursors to anti- and prosocial behavior in young adults. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 241-257. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer– Loeber, M., Liu., J. (2006). The reactive-proactive aggression(RPQ) questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 159-171. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rys, G. S., & Bear, G. G. (1997). Relational aggression and peer relations: Gender and developmental issues. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43(1), 87-106. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28(1), 30-44. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vitaro, F., Gendrau, P., Tremblay,R., & Oligny, P. (1998). Reactive and proactive aggression differentially predict later conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 377-385. | zh_TW |
