| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃立 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hwang, Li | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 張南薰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Chang,Nan Hsun | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 張南薰 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chang,Nan Hsun | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 14:32:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 14:32:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 14:32:15 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0906515051 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32829 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 博士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 法律學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 90651505 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 關於WTO協定間條文與條文間之適用關係，依據小組所建立的原則，即基於WTO協定係屬一體承諾之性質，WTO協定下之義務應屬累積的義務，會員在任何時點均應遵守所有的義務，除非有形式上的衝突存在。然而，整個WTO協定包括了馬爾喀什建立WTO協定、商品貿易多邊協定、服務貿易總協定、智財權等不同部門的協定，到決議文、瞭解書等，有多達六十多種不同的法律文件。這些法律文件是在不同時期及不同背景下，經由不同的談判者所協商而成，而談判者在談判當時，對於各項法律文件間之關係未必有所認知並進一步地為適當的安排，因此未預見的重複、漏洞或衝突，即有可能產生。對於WTO協定條文間錯綜複雜的關係，WTO實務在若干案件中雖有所著墨，但對於何時應屬累積適用及何時構成法律衝突而具有排除適用之效果，並無一致性的判斷標準存在，因此本文即希望透過將WTO協定間法律適用關係之類型化，進而歸納出應屬累積適用關係及排除適用關係的條文，並尋求體系化及一致性的的判斷標準。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Because of the Uruguay Round negotiations brought about a `single WTO package` at a very late stage of the negotiations, the WTO system itself has not clearly regulated the issue of the possible relationships between provisions in GATT 1994 and other Annex 1A Agreements or provisions in different Agreements. The only linkages set out in WTO law are one general rule of prevalence, in case of conflict (the General Interpretative Note to Annex 1A) and several cross-references in individual Agreements. The authors submit that panels and the Appellate Body have so far identified four relationships between provisions of the WTO Agreements, which can be characterized as conflict, express derogation, confirming, and complementarity. These relationships have different legal effects on the application of the provisions concerned. Although it is not excluded that over time more types of relationships will be identified and developed, it is useful to take stock of the case law setting out the possible linkages. While not purporting to be exhaustive, the present work is an attempt to analyze the cases that appear to be the most significant for clarifying the different relationships. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1第一節 研究動機及目的 1第二節 研究範圍及方法 4第三節 論文架構 4第二章 WTO協定間之規範重疊 7第一節 規範重疊之概念 7第二節 農業協定、SCM協定及GATT間之關係 8壹、農產品市場進入之相關規範 9一、關稅拘束義務 10二、農產品之數量限制措施 14三、小結 16貳、農產品境內支持之相關規範 16一、GATT 1994之規定 16二、SCM協定之規定 18三、農業協定之規定 19四、農產品境內支持之規範重疊問題 20參、農產品出口補貼之相關規範 26一、GATT 1994之規定 26二、SCM協定之規定 27三、農業協定 27四、農產品出口補貼措施之規範重疊問題 29肆、小結 30第三節 GATT、SPS協定及TBT協定與間之關係 31壹、不歧視原則及其例外 32一、GATT 1994之規定 32二、SPS協定 40三、TBT協定 44三、規範重疊之問題 45第四節 GATT與反傾銷、SCM協定及防衛協定間之關係 47壹、GATT 1994第VI條與反傾銷協定之關係 48一、 實施反傾銷措施之實體要件 48二、代表第三國實施之反傾銷措施 49貳、GATT 1994第VI條與SCM協定之關係 49一、實施平衡稅措施之實體要件 49參、GATT 1994第XIX條與防衛協定之關係 50一、實施防衛措施之實體要件 50二、報復權之行使 52第五節 爭端解決程序之一般規定與特別規定 53壹、反傾銷協定第17條與DSU之關係 53一、諮商請求之內容 54二、成立爭端解決小組之請求 54三、小結 55貳、SCM協定第4條與DSU之關係 55一、諮商期間 55二、小組審查期間 55三、小組建議之內容及執行期間 55四、小組報告採認期間 56五、上訴機構審查期間 56六、其他期間規定 56七、小結 57第六節 結論 57第三章 WTO協定間之累積適用關係 59第一節 累積適用關係之類型化 59第二節 補充關係 61一、學者見解 61二、WTO之實務案例 62（一）Canada-Periodicals案 62（二）EC-Bananas III案 63（三）GATT與GATS之關係 64三、補充關係之認定 65第三節 原則例外關係 66壹、不同協定中之原則例外規定 66一、最惠國待遇原則與授權條款之關係 66二、GATT第XXIV條與防衛協定之關係 70貳、原則例外關係之認定 76第四節 確認關係 77壹、確認關係之相關規定 77一、重複規定之關係 77二、基本規定與詳細規定之關係 82貳、確認關係之認定 83第五節 其他關係 84第六節 結論 85第四章 WTO協定間之衝突關係與衝突條款 87第一節 WTO協定內之衝突條款 87壹、解決GATT與貨品貿易多邊協定間衝突之規定 88一、附件1A總附註 88二、防衛協定第11.1(a)條 92貳、解決農業協定與其他協定衝突之規定 95一、農業協定第13條 95二、農業協定第21.1條 101參、解決SPS協定、TBT協定及GATT衝突之規定 103一、SPS協定與TBT協定之衝突－TBT協定第1.5條 103二、SPS協定與GATT第XX條之衝突－SPS協定第2.4條 106三、TBT協定與GATT第XX條之衝突 109四、小結 110肆、爭端解決程序一般規定與特別規定之衝突 111一、Guatemala-Cement I案 111二、Brazil-Aircraft案 113三、小結 114伍、小結 115第二節 衝突條款之認定 116壹、衝突條款之類型 116貳、防衛協定第11.1(a)條是否為衝突條款? 119第三節 衝突之定義 120壹、國際法上之衝突定義 121一、狹義說 121二、廣義說 122貳、狹義衝突定義適用在WTO協定時所生之問題 126一、農產品出口補貼措施是否為禁止性補貼？ 126二、實施防衛措施之諮商補償義務 129三、小結 130第四節 處理相同事物之要件 130壹、處理相同事物之認定 131一、維也納條約法公約第30條之規定 131二、WTO實務上之見解 133貳、處理相同事物要件之必要性 137第五節 結論 139第五章 WTO協定間之衝突關係與衝突法則 141第一節 法律位階理論 141壹、減讓表或承諾表與協定本文之衝突 142一、減讓表之性質 142二、減讓表與協定本文之關係 142貳、其他國際規範與WTO協定本文之衝突 143一、國際慣例及一般原理原則與WTO協定之關係 145二、其他國際協定與WTO協定之關係 153三、小結 156第二節 法律解釋原則 157壹、無衝突推定原則 157貳、條約有效解釋原則 158一、有效解釋原則在WTO實務上之運用 159二、條約有效解釋原則之界限 160第三節 國際法上之其他衝突法則 162壹、後法優先原則 162一、後法優先原則在WTO實務上之運用 163二、小結 164貳、特別法優先原則 165一、特別法優先原則在WTO實務上之運用 165第四節 結論 167第六章 結論 169附圖一：WTO協定間之法律適用關係 173參考文獻 175 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 52497 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 78122 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 76158 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 88808 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 128511 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 352901 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 232671 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 356656 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 235225 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 157638 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 89179 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0906515051 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 法律衝突 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 衝突條款 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 衝突定義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | WTO協定 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 累積適用 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | conflict of norms | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | conflict clause | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | definition of conflict | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | WTO Agreements | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | accumulation | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | WTO協定間法律適用關係之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | A Study on the overlaps between provisions in WTO agreements | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 一、、中文文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （一）專書論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. 羅昌發，國際貿易法，月旦，1997年。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. 林倫帆，WTO貨品貿易協定中「必要性」概念之研究，國立臺灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文（2004）。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. 楊光華，由「未預見之發展」要件論WTO防衛協定面臨之兩難，載：第三屆國際經貿法學發展學術研討會－WTO新議題與新挑戰（2003年8月）。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （二）期刊論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. 林彩瑜，論WTO架構下區域貿易協定防衛措施適用之有關問題，政大法學評論，第86期（94年8月） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. 張南薰，世界貿易組織下美國鋼品防衛措施爭端解決之研究，政大法學評論，第84期（94年4月） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 二、西文文獻 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （一）專書 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. ANTHONY AUST, MODERN TREATY LAW AND PRACTICE（2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. MITSUO MATSUSHITA, THOMAS J. SCHEONBAUM & PETROS C. MAVROIDIS, THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION: LAW, PRACTICE, AND POLICY（2003）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. JOOST PAUWELYN, CONFLICT OF NORMS IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW: HOW WTO LAW RELATED TO OTHER RULES OF INTERNATIONLAW（2003） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. SIR IAN SINCLAIR, THE VIENNA CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF TREATIES（2nd ed., 1984）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （二）專書論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Wolfram Karl, Conflict Between Treaties, in 4 ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 935, 936（Rudolf Bernhardt ed., 2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. JOHN H. JACKSON, The WTO: structure of the treaty and the institution, in SOVEREIGNTY, THE WTO, AND CHANGING FUNDAMENTALS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 104, 104-105（2006）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （三）期刊論文 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Andrew D. Mitchell, The Legal Basis for Using Principles in WTO Disputes, 10 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW 795, 796（2007）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Axel Desmedt, Proportionality in WTO Law, 4(3) JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW 441, 443（Sep. 2001） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. Christopher J. Borgen, Resolving Treaty Conflicts, 37 GEORGE WASHINGTON INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW 573, 575（2005）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. Craig Thorn & Marinn Carlson, The Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade, 31 LAW AND POLICY IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS 841, 841（2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. Didier Chambovey, How the Expiry of the Peace Clause（Article 13 of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture）Might Alter Disciplines on Agricultural Subsidies in the WTO Framework, 36(2) JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 309（2002）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. David Palmeter & Petros C. Mavroidis, The WTO Legal System: Source of Law, 92 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 398, 399（1998） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. Duncan French, Treaty Interpretation and the Incorporation of Extraneous Legal Rules, 55 INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY 281, 305-307（2006）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8. Elisabetta Montaguti & Maurits Lugard, The GATT 1994 and other Annex 1A Agreement: Four Different Relationship? 3 JOURNAL OF INTERNATONAL ECONOMIC LAW 473（2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9. Erich Vranes, The Definition of “Norm Conflict” in International Law and Legal Theory, 17 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONA LAW 395,（2006） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10. E.W. Veirdag, “The Time of the Conclusion” of a Multilateral Treaty: Article 30 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and Related Provisions, 59 BRITISH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 100（1988） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11. Fabian Delcros, The Legal Status of Agriculture in the World Trade Organization－State of Play at the Start of Negotiations, 36(2) JOURNAL OF WOLRD TRADE 219, 251（2002）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12. Felix Mueller, Is the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade Article XIX “Unforeseen Developments Clause” Still Effective Under the Agreement on Safeguards? 37(6) JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 1119, 1130（2003） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13. Gabrielle Marceau & Joel P. Trachtman, The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 36(5) JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 811, 836（2002） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14. Gabrielle Marceau, Conflict of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions; The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other Treaties, 35(6) JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 1081, 1084（2001） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15. Han Aufricht, Supersession of Treaties in International Law, 37 CORNELL L.Q. 655, 700（1952） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16. International Law Commission, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, Fragmentation of international law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of international law, U.N. GAOR, 54th Sess., at.17,U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/L.682,（2006） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17. Jan Neumann & Elisabeth Türk, Necessity Revisited: Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law After Korea-Beef, EC-Asbestos and EC-Sardines, 37(1) JOURNAL OF WOLRD TRADE 199, （2003） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18. James Cameron & Kevin R. Gary, Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body, 50 INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY 248, 257（2001） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19. John O. McGinnis, The Appropriate Hierarchy of Global Multilateralism and Customary International Law: The Example of the WTO, 44 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 229, 231（2003）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20. Julia Ya Qin, Defining Nondiscrimination under the Law of the World Trade Organization, 23 BOSTON UNIVERSITY INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 215, 253（2005） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 21. Joost Pauwelyn, The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?, 95 AMERICAIN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 535, 541, 570（2001）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 22. Lorand Bartels, Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings, 35(3) J.W.T.499, 502（2001）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 23. Matthew C. Porterfield, U.S. Farm Subsidies and the Expiration of the WTO’s Peace clause, UNIVERSITY OF PEENSYLVANIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONL ECONOMIC LAW 999, 1020-1021（2006） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 24. Margaret A Young, The WTO Use of Relevant Rules of International Law: An Analysis of the Biotech Case, 56 INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY 907, 912（2007） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 25. Mark Wu, Small States, Big Veto: Customary International Law in the WTO after EC-Biotech, 32 YALE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 261, 265（2007） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 26. Michael Lennard, Navigating by the Star: Interpreting the WTO Agreements, 5 JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW 17, 70-71（March, 2002） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 27. Richard H. Steinberg and Timothy E. Fosling, “When the Peace End: the Vulnerability of EC and US Agricultural Subsides to WTO Legal Challenge”, 6(2) JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW 377（2003）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 28. Reinbard Quick & Andreas Blüthner, Has the Appellate Body Erred? An Appraisal and Criticism of the Ruling in the WTO Hormones Case, 2(4) JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW 603, 631-632（Dec. 1999） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 29. Robert Howse, The Use and Abuse of other “Relevant Rules of International Law” in Treaty Interpretation: Insights from WTO Trade/Environment Litigation, IILJ Working Paper 2007/1（www.iilj.org） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 30. Sabrina Safrin, Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the World Trade Organization Agreement, 56 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 606, 614（2002） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 31. Wilfred Jenks, The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties, 30 THE BRITISH YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW（BYIL）401, 425（1953） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 32. Yong-Shik Lee, Critical Issue in the Application of the WTO Rules on Safeguards－In the Light of the Recent Panel Reports and Appellate Body Decisions, 34(2) JOURNAL OF WORLD TRADE 131, 136（2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 33. Yong-Shik Lee, Destabilization of the Discipline on Safeguard? Inherent Problems with the Continuing Application of Article XX after the Settlement of the Agreement on Safeguards, 35(6) JOURANL OF WORLD TRADE 1235, 1239（2001）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （四）網站資訊 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Andrea Schulz, The Relationship Between the Judgments Project and Other International Instruments 14（Hague Conference on Private International Law, Prel. Doc. No. 24, 2003）, http://hcch.e-vision.nl/upload/wop/genaff_pd19e.pdf（last visited Oct. 31, 2007） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Chris Wold, Legal Assessment of Compatibility Issues between the Protocol Concerning Specially Protected Areas and Wildlife (SPAW) to the Cartagena Convention and the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), http://www.lclark.edu/org/ielp/objects/opinion_spaw.pdf（last visited Nov. 5, 2007） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. Jeffrey Waincymer, Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | http://www.apec.org.au/docs/waincymer2001.pdf （last visited 6 November 2007） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | （五）WTO/GATT案件 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 1. Australia－Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon, WT/DS18/R（12 June 1998）； WT/DS18/AB/R（Oct. 20. 1998） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 2. Australia－Measures Affecting Importation of Salmon - Recourse to Article 21.5 by Canada, WT/DS18/RW（18 Feb., 2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 3. Argentina－Safeguard Measures on Imports of Footwear, WT/DS121/R（25 June 1999）；WT/DS121/AB/R（14 Dec. 1999） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 4. Brazil－Measures Affecting Desiccated Coconut, WT/DS22/R（17 Oct. 1996）；WT/DS22/AB/R（21 February 1997） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 5. Canada－Measures Affecting Exports of Unprocessed Herring and Salmon, BISD 35S/98（adopted on 22 March 1988） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 6. Canada－Measures affecting the exportation of dairy products and the importation of milk; recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by New Zealand and the United State, WT/DS103/RW, WT/DS113/RW（11 July 2001）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 7. Chile－Price Band System and Safeguard Measures Relating to Certain Agricultural Products, WT/DS207/R（3 May 2002）；WT/DS207/AB/R（23 September 2002）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 8. European Communities－Measures Affecting Asbestos and Products Containing Asbestos, WT/DS135/R（18 September 2000）；WT/DS135/AB/R（12 March 2001） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 9. European Communities－Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, WT/DS27/R/ECU, WT/DS27/R/GTM, WT/DS27/R/HND, WT/DS27/R/MEX, WT/DS27/R/USA,（22 May 1997）；WT/DS27/AB/R（9 September 1997 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 10. European Communities — Customs Classification of Certain Computer Equipment, ¶84, WT/DS62/AB/R, WT/DS67/AB/R, WT/DS68/AB/R（5 June 1998）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 11. European Communities－Conditions for the Granting of Tariff Preferences to Developing Countries, WT/DS246/R（1 Dec. 2003）；WT/DS246/AB/R（7 April 2004） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 12. European Communities－Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/R/USA（18 August 1997）；WT/DS26/AB/R（16 January 1998） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 13. European Economic Community－Payments and Subsidies Paid to Processors and Producers of Oilseeds and Related Animal-Feed Proteins, L/6627 BISD 37S/86（25 January 1990）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 14. European Communities－Trade Description of Sardines,WT/DS231/R（29 May 2002） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 15 European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, WT/DS293/R（29 September 2006）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 16. Guatemala－Anti-Dumping Investigation Regarding Portland Cement from Mexico, WT/DS60/R（19 June 1998）；WT/DS60/AB/R（2 November 1998）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 17. Indonesia－Certain measures Affecting the Automobile Industry, WT/DS54/R, WT/DS55/R, WT/DS59/R, WT/DS64/R（2 July 1998） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 18. Japan－Taxes on Alcoholic Beverages, WT/DS8/AB/R, WT/DS10/AB/R, WT/DS11/AB/R（Oct. 4, 1996）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 19. Korea－Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef, WT/DS161/R, WT/DS169/R（July 31, 2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Korea－Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef, WT/DS161/AB/R, WT/DS169/AB/R（Nov. 12, 2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 20. Korea－Definitive Safeguard Measure on Imports of Certain Dairy Products, WT/DS98/R（21 June 1999）；WT/DS98/AB/R（14 December 1999）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 21. Korea－Measures Affecting Government Procurement, WT/DS163/R（1 May 2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 22. Thailand－Restrictions on Importation of and Internal Taxes on Cigarettes, BISD 37S/200（adopted 7 Nov. 1990） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 23. Turkey－Restrictions on Imports of Textile and Clothing Products, WT/DS34/R（31 May, 1999） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 24. United States－Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, BISD 36S/345,（adopted Nov. 7, 1989） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 25. United States－Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Circular Welded Carbon Quality Line Pipe from Korea, WT/DS202/R（29 October 2001）；WT/DS202/AB/R（15 February 2002）. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 26. United States-Anti-Dumping Act of 1916, WT/DS136/R（13 March 2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 27. United States－Standards for Reformulated and Conventional Gasoline, WT/DS2/AB/R（29 April, 1996） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 28. United States－Anti-Dumping Measures on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Products from Japan, WT/DS184/AB/R（24 July 2001） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 29. United States－Subsidies on Upland Cotton, WT/DS267/R（8 September 2004）；WT/DS267/AB/R（3 March 2005） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 30. United States－Tax Treatment for "Foreign Sales Corporations", WT/DS108/R（8 October 1999）；WT/DS108/AB/R（24 February 2000） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 31. United States－Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS58/AB/R（Oct. 12 1998） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 32. United States－Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, WT/DS/58/RW（15 June 2001） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 33. United States-Definitive Safeguard Measures on Imports of Certain Steel Products, WT/DS248/R, WT/DS249/R, WT/DS251/R, WT/DS252/R, WT/DS253/R, WT/DS254/R, WT/DS258/R, WT/DS259/R（11 July 2003）；WT/DS248/AB/R, WT/DS249/AB/R, WT/DS251/AB/R, WT/DS252/AB/R, WT/DS253/AB/R, WT/DS254/AB/R, WT/DS258/AB/R, WT/DS259/AB/R（10 November 2003） | zh_TW |
