| dc.contributor.advisor | 徐聯恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 陳依甯 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Chen, Yi Ning | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 陳依甯 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chen, Yi Ning | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 14:47:33 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 14:47:33 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 14:47:33 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0094157004 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32891 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 幼兒教育所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 94157004 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 教育改革近年來在世界各國蔚為風潮，而藉由市場的力量促進學校間彼此競爭是其中一項重要的理念，但促使教育市場化的結果，衍生出許多的爭議和問題。本研究以學校競爭、幼兒園品質、組織創新為主要變項，希望透過本研究來釐清三個變項間之關係，並瞭解學校競爭影響幼兒園品質、組織創新之情形。 本研究以台北市文山區和萬華區兩區立案之公私立幼兒園為實徵研究之對象，有效樣本共81份。並以描述統計、獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析及相關分析等方法來分析並驗證本研究所提出之各項假設。 本研究之主要發現如下：一、本研究釐清學校競爭之概念內涵，並與幼兒園品質、組織創新作相關連結。二、文山區和萬華區之幼兒園競爭程度分佈不均。三、文山區之幼兒園競爭程度較萬華區高。四、文山區和萬華區之幼兒園園長認為自身園所幼兒園品質之現況佳。五、文山區和萬華區之幼兒園園長認為自身園所知識活動品質之現況尚待加強。六、文山區和萬華區之幼兒園園長認為自身園所採用組織創新之現況佳。七、學校競爭與服務品質呈中度正相關。八、教學創新與行政創新呈中度正相關。九、公立幼稚園採用行政創新比私立托兒所多。 最後研究者根據研究結論，就實務面和後續研究方向提出具體的建議，以期對未來幼教的發展有所助益。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Educational reform has been a trend in western countries. School competition is one of the concept in market-oriented reforms. Yet, evidence on the actual benefits of market-oriented reforms is at best mixed.The purpose of the article is to integrative school competition and the relationship between ECE program quality and organizational innovation in kindergarten. A questionnaires survey are adopted for the study and were distributed to 153 kindergartens in Wenshan district and Wanhua district of Taipei City. The number of valid return rate was 54.2%. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, Person correlation, t-test, and ANOVA.The results were as follow:1. This study investigated the concept of school competition, and linked up school competition with ECE program quality and organizational innovation.2. This study revealed that the degree of competition between kindergartens was not equal.3. This study showed that the competition in Wenshan district was higher than in Wanhua district.4. This study indicated that ECE program quality was good in Wenshan district and Wanhua district.5. This study showed that knowledge activity quality of kindergarten needed to strengthen in Wenshan and Wanhua district.6. This study indicated that organizational innovation of kindergarten was good in Wenshan district and Wanhua district.7. This study demonstrated a positive relationship between school competition and service quality.8. This study showed a positive relationship between instruction innovation and administration innovation.9.This study revealed that administration innovations in public school were adopted more than in private school. Overall, findings from this study pointed to several relevant implications for the early childhood education practice and follow-up research. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論第一節 研究動機 1第二節 研究目的與研究問題 5第三節 研究範圍與限制 6第四節 名詞釋義 8第二章 文獻探討第一節 學校競爭之意涵與衡量 11第二節 組織創新之意涵 34第三節 學校競爭與幼兒園品質之關係 43第三章 研究設計與實施第一節 研究方法 67第二節 研究架構 69第三節 研究假設 71第四節 研究對象 72第五節 研究工具 75第六節 資料處理與分析方法 81第四章 結果分析第一節 幼兒園品質與幼兒園組織創新之現況分析 83第二節 學校競爭與幼兒園品質之相關分析 93第三節 學校競爭與幼兒園組織創新之相關分析 95第四節 次樣本分析 97第五章 結論與建議第一節 結論與討論 101第二節 建議 105參考文獻 107附錄附錄一：文山區學區圖 115附錄二：萬華區學區圖 117附錄三：文山區幼兒園位置圖 119附錄四：萬華區幼兒園位置圖 121附錄五：幼兒園品質和組織創新問卷 123表 目 次表2-1：市場結構的類型 14表2-2：美國自由市場導向的教育券模式 18表2-3：組織創新的屬性 38表2-4：幼兒園品質衡量工具之比較 51表2-5：1972-2001年期間，美國學校競爭與教育品質的相關研究 53表2-6：台灣目前實行的三項幼兒教育券方案比較 63表2-7：教育券與學校競爭、教育品質相關之實證研究 64表3-1：公、私立幼托園所的核准招收人數 72表3-2：文山、萬華區公立國小一年級實際就學人數 73表3-3：本研究問卷回收情形摘要表1 74表3-4：本研究問卷回收情形摘要表2 74表3-5：文山、萬華區競爭程度 75表3-6：品質量表25題採用直交轉軸之最大變異量法後的因素分析摘要表 79表3-7：幼兒園品質量表之信度摘要表 79表4-1：幼兒園品質之現況分析摘要表 83表4-2：幼兒園品質各題項之現況分析摘要表 86表4-3：幼兒園組織創新之現況分析摘要表 88表4-4：幼兒園組織創新各題項之現況分析摘要表 89表4-5：學校競爭程度與幼兒園品質之相關摘要表 93表4-6：學校競爭程度與幼兒園組織創新之相關摘要表 95表4-7：學校競爭程度與公私立幼兒園之幼兒園品質、組織創新之相關摘要表 97表4-8：公私立幼兒園在幼兒園品質之變異數分析 98表4-9：公私立幼兒園在組織創新之變異數分析 100圖 目 次圖2-1：自由競爭教育市場模型 16圖2-2：影響幼教品質的層次 47圖3-1：本研究之研究架構 69圖4-1：公立幼稚園和私立托兒所在行政創新之差異 100 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 15979 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 17468 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 18211 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 16504 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 74608 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 33634 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 182319 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 473194 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 264311 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 231902 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 62142 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 136722 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 111596 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 103703 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 91011 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 98583 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 186738 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094157004 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 市場化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 學校競爭 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 幼兒園 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 幼兒園品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 組織創新 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | market-oriented | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | school competition | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | kindergarten | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | ECE program quality | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | organizational innovation | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 學校競爭與幼兒園品質、組織創新之相關研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | A Study of The Relations Between School Competition, ECE Program Quality, and Organizational Innovation | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文部份 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 何瑞薇(譯)（2001）。Sallis, E.著。全面品質教育。台北：元照。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廖鳳瑞(譯)（2002）。Katz, L. G.著。與幼教大師對談---邁向專業成長之路。台北：信誼。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王保進（2002）。台北市幼兒教育券政策成效評估之研究。初等教育學刊，13，頁25-52。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 白育綺(2004)。幼兒園品質指標建構之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 巫永森（2002）。幼兒教育券政策實施情形之調查硏究 : 以彰化縣為例。私立靜宜大學靑少年兒童福利硏究所碩士論文，未出版，台中縣。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 巫永森與邱志鵬（2001）。台灣地區幼兒教育券政策之歷史研究。兒童福利期刊，1，頁1- 40。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 巫永森與邱志鵬（2002）。台灣地區幼兒教育券政策實施情形之調查研究-以彰化縣為例。兒童福利期刊，3，頁131-151。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳清山與黃久芬（1995）。美國教育選擇權之研究。初等教育學刊，4，頁1-26。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳清山與賴協志（2007）。桃園縣國民中小學教育品質之研究---判斷指標、影響因素及提升途徑。當代教育研究，15(1)，頁1-38。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳金盛（2001）。台北市幼兒教育券政策實施情況之研究。國立台北師範學院國 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 沈姍姍（2003）。家長教育選擇權的發展與爭議。北縣教育，45，頁40-44。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李家宗（1997）。英美教育改革法案中市場導向之比較研究。國立暨南國際大學比較教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，南投縣。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李敦義（2000）。市場化理論分析及對台灣中小學教育改革的啟示。教育研究資訊，8(6)，頁62-88。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 呂金玲（2001）。從國民教育權和競爭績效分析教育券政策。國立臺灣師範大學三民主義硏究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林明吟（2005）。台北縣家長對我國幼兒教育券政策實施之調查硏究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林麗珍（2004）。台南縣市幼兒教育券相關問題之研究。國立台南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台南市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林文達（1984）。教育經濟學。台北市：三民。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 徐聯恩與劉蓁（2005）。幼兒園品質衡量：從內部導向到外部導向。載於潘慧玲(主編)，教育評鑑的回顧與展望(頁159 – 218)。台北市：心理。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 徐聯恩與丘嘉慧（2003）。【教育券政策與教育品質之探討-學校競爭觀點】。未發表之文章。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 徐聯恩與李敦義（2003）。【學校競爭的探討】。未發表之文章。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 徐聯恩（2005）。市場競爭、組織創新與教育品質。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫，未出版。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 秦夢群（2002）。市場機制或社會正義：教育券政策走向之分析研究。教育政策論壇，5：2，頁25-42。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳明德（2000）。國民小學實施家長教育選擇權可行性之研究-以台北縣為例。國立臺北師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳善德（民89）。建立教育品質系統的幾個關鍵思考。北縣教育，35，頁18-22。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳淑美（2004）。嘉義市幼兒教育券實施成效及對家長選擇幼稚園影響之研究。國立中正大學教育學研究所，未出版，嘉義縣。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳靜怡（2004）。幼稚園組織創新與跨組織關係之研究。國立政治大學幼教所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳怡如（2003）。我國幼兒教育券政策執行成效評估 : 家長與業者觀點。國立中正大學政治硏究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義縣。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 湯堯（1997）。教育市場導向探討與省思-市場模型建立與研究。教育研究資訊，5（3），頁74-85。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 趙康伶（2002）。國實施幼兒教育券之硏究 : 以高屏兩縣為例。國立屏東師範學院國民教育硏究所碩士論文，未出版，屏東市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蔡玉娩（2003）。福利經濟之硏究 : 以宜蘭縣幼兒教育券政策為例。佛光人文社會學院經濟學硏究所碩士論文，未出版，宜蘭縣。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蓋浙生（民71）。教育經濟學。台北市：三民。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 蓋浙生（民82）。教育經濟與計畫。台北市：五南。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉姵君（2005）。市場導向、組織學習、組織創新與幼稚園學校效能關係之研究。國立政治大學幼兒教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉朝芳（2000）。幼兒教育券實施之硏究。國立彰化師範大學教育硏究所碩士論文，未出版，彰化市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉蓁(2007)。幼兒園品質信念與幼兒園品質關係之研究。國立政治大學幼教所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 鄭孟忠（2001）。我國幼兒教育券實施成效及其對家長教育選擇權影響之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，嘉義市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 盧美貴與謝美慧（2001）。台北市幼兒教育券政策實施成效分析。台北市立師範學院學報，32，頁429-450。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 謝美慧（2002）。教育政策評估理論之硏究 : 以北、高兩市幼兒教育券政策為例。國立臺灣師範大學教育硏究所博士論文，未出版，台北市。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 英文部份 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Arcaro, J. S., (1995). Quality in education: an implementation handbook. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Anderson, J. C., Rungtusanatham, M., & Schroeder, R. G.(1994). A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Academy of Management Review, 19(3), 472-509. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Arum, R., (1996). Do private schools force public school to compete? American Sociological Review, 61, 29-46. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Barrow, L. & Rouse, C., (2000). Using market valuation to assess the importance and efficiency of public school spending. Working Paper 438, Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Belfield, C. R. & Levin, H. M.(2002). The effects of competition between schools on educational outcomes: a review for the United States. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 279-341. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Blair & Staley(1995). Quality competition and public schools: Further evidence. Economics of Education Review, 14, 193-198. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Borland, M. V. & Howson, R. M., (1992). Students’ academic achievement and the degree of market concentration in education. Economics of Education Review,11, 31-39. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Borland, M. V. & Howson, R. M., (1996). Competition, expenditures and student 20 performance in mathematics: a comment on Crouch et al. Public Choice, 87, 395-400. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brokaw, A. J., Gale, J. R. & Merz, T. E., (1995). Competition and the level of expenditures: K-through-12 public schools in Michigan. Journal of Economics, 21, 99-103. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Christopher, A. S. & Nicholas, P. L. Jr., (1996). Private school enrollment and public school performance: assessing the effects of competition upon public school student achievement in Washington state. Policy Studies Journal, 24, 666-675. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Couch, J. F., Shughart, W. F. & Williams, A., (1993). Private school enrollment and public school performance. Public Choice, 76, 301-312. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crosby, P. B.(1979). Quality is free. New York: Mentor Executive Library. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dee, T. S., (1998). Competition and the quality of public schools. Economics of Education Review, 17, 419-427. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Duncombe, W., Miner, J. & Ruggiero, J., (1997). Empirical evaluation of bureaucratic models of inefficiency. Public Finance Quarterly, 24, 291-318. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Geller, C. R., Sjoquist, D. L. & Walker, M. B., (2001). The effect of private school competition on public school performance. NCSPE Working Paper. Retrieved September 1, 2002, from www.ncspe.org | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Goldhaber, D., (1999). An endogenous model of public school expenditures and private school enrollment. Journal of Urban Economics, 46, 106-128. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Grosskopf, S., Hayes, K., Taylor, L. L. & Weber, W. L., (1999). Allocative inefficiency and school competition. In Proceedings of the 91st Annual Conference on Taxation. Washington, DC: National Tax Association. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gibbons, S.,Stephen, M.& Olmo, S.(2006,July). Choice, Competition and Pupil Achievement. The Economic Journal, 116, 77-92. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Halfon, N., Shulman, E., & Hochstein, M. (2001). Brain development in early childhood education. In Halfon, N., Shulman, E., & Hochstein, M. (Eds.), Building community systems for young children (pp.1-24), UCLA Center for Healthier Children, Families and Communities. Retrieved Nov. 21, 2006, from http://www.healthychild.ucla.edu/Publications/Documents/halfon.health.dev.pdf | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanson, M.(2001), Institute theory and educational change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(5), 637-661. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hanushek, E. K. & Rivkin, S. G., (2001). Does public school competition affect teacher quality? Available from http://edpro.stanford.edu/eah/down.htm | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Henry, G. T. & Craig S. G.(2003,March). Can Competition Improve Educational Outcomes? Paper presented at the meeting of American Education Finance Association, Orlando, FL. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hirsch, D., (2002). What Works in Innovation in Education School: A Choice of Direction. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hoxby, C. M., (1994). Do private schools provide competition for public schools? National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 4978. Available from http://nber.org | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hoxby, C. M., (2000). Would school choice change the teaching profession ？ 21 Available from http://post.economic.harvard.edu/faculty/hoxby/papers.html | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hoxby, C. M. (2003). School choice and school competition: Evidence from the United States. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 10, 11-67. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jepsen, C., (1999). The effects of private school competition on student achievement. Available from www.norghweatern,edu/ipr/publications/workingpapers/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Juran, J. M.(1986). A universal approach to managing for quality. Quality Process, 12,19-24. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kang, B. G. & Geene, K. V., (2002). The effects of monitoring and competition on public education outputs: A stochastic frontier approach. Public Finance Review, 30, 3-26. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kenny, L. W. & Schmidt, A. B., (1994). The decline in the number of school districts in the US: 1950-1980. Public Choice, 79, 1-18. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leaonard, J. F., (1991). Applying Deming’s principles to our school. South Carolina Business Journal, 11, 23-34. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lovell, M. C., (1978). Spending for education: The exercise of public choice. Review of Economics and Statistics, 40, 487-495. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Maranto, R., Milliman, S. & Stevens, S., (2000). Does private school competition harm public schools? Revisiting Smith and Meier’s “ The case against school choice.” Political Research Quarterly, 53, 177-192. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marlow, M. L., (1997). Public education supply and student performance. Applied Economics, 29, 617-626. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marlow, M. L., (2000). Spending, school structure, and public education quality: Evidence from California. Economics of Education Review, 19, 89-106. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McMillan, R., (1999). Competition, parental involvement and public school | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | performance. Dissertation, Stanford University. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Navaratnam, K. K. & O’Connor, R., (1993). Quality assurance in vocational | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | education: meeting the needs of the nineties. Vocational Aspect of Education, 45, 113-123. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Navaratnam, K. K. & Wallace, Z., (1994). Quality assurance in TAFE teaching. Quality Magazine, 3, 80-86. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Newmark, C. M., (1995). Another look at whether private schools influence public school quality: comment. Public Choice, 82, 365-373. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Olian, J. D. & Rynes, S. L., (1991). Making total quality work: aligning | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | organizational processes, performance measures, and stakeholders. Human Resources Management, 30, 303-333. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oplatka, I.(2004 ).The characteristics of the school organization and the constraints on market ideology in education：an institutional view, Journal of Education Policy, 19(2), 143-161. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rangazas, P., (1997). Competition and private school vouchers. Education Economics, 5, 245-264. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rees, N. S., (1999). Public school benefits of private school vouchers. Policy Review, 93, 16-24. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sallis, E. (1994). From system to leadership: The development of the quality movement in future education. In G. D. Doherty(Ed.), Developing quality system in education (pp. 226-241). London: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sander, W., (1999). Private schools and public school achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 34, 697-709. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Simon, C. A. & Lovrich, N. P., Jr., (1996). Private school performance and public school performance: assessing the effects of competition upon public school student achievement in Washington State. Policy Studies Journal, 24, 666-675. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith, K. B. & Meier, K. J.,(1995). Public choice in education: markets and the demand for quality education. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 461-478. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Vedder, R. & Hall, J., (2000). Private school competition and public teacher salaries. Journal of Labor Research, 21, 161-168. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wrinkle, R. D., Stewart, J, & Polinard, J. L., (1999). Public school quality, private schools, and race. American Journal of Political Science, 43. 1248-1253. | zh_TW |
