學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫之研究
作者 謝佩璇
Hsieh, Pei-Hsuan
貢獻者 湯志民
謝佩璇
Hsieh, Pei-Hsuan
關鍵詞 知識管理
學校空間
知識管理空間規畫
日期 2002
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 14:57:03 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究主要目的在探討臺北市國民中學的行政人員、教師兼行政人員及專任教師使用學校空間與設備及運用知識管理的情形,包括使用的每天平均時數、使用滿意度,並探討其認為規畫學校空間應考慮的重要因素,以問卷調查法、檔案資料內容分析法、觀察法、訪談法來分析未來知識管理空間的具體作為及可能的侷限性。在資料分析上,問卷調查以次數分配、百分率統計、F檢定、Cochran Q考驗、卡方考驗、多變量變異數分析、單變量變異數分析、單因子變異數分析、Spearman等級相關及Scheffé事後比較;檔案資料內容分析以次數、百分率作記錄說明;觀察及訪談以整理圖文記錄說明,最後研究結果發現:
一、知識管理運用及學校空間規畫上的相關概念及研究:(一)知識管理以訂定知識目標與確認知識、獲取知識與運用知識、知識分享與傳播、知識發展與儲存知識、評價與量測知識五步驟讓教育團隊經營有效率。(二)學校教職員在教學空間、行政空間及共同使用空間,皆以資訊管理系統為主軸發展經驗式學習、終身學習等知識內容。
二、臺北市國民中學教職員對學校空間與設備使用情形:(一)教職員對空間與設備能善加利用,使用資訊管理系統人數最多,教師兼行政人員使用行政空間與設備的時間最長。(二)資訊管理系統的堪用程度普遍受到教職員肯定,以服務年資五年以下的行政人員、教師兼行政人員在校舍面積大者對堪用程度最滿意。(三)教職員經常使用行政公佈欄、線上研習報名及查詢、線上教學教材或試題等資訊管理系統;設備以桌上型電腦、筆記型電腦、單槍投影機、印表機、掃瞄器為主。(四)教職員在教學空間及行政空間使用資訊設備情形相同,然而在不同空間有不同資訊設備配置需求、不同職務亦有不同需求程度。(五)行政人員較有機會使用各種資訊設備,其次是教師兼行政人員及專任教師。(六)教職員經常使用的教學空間是普通教室、教師辦公室、視聽教室、專科教室、教材製作室及圖書室。(七)教職員經常使用的行政空間是辦公處室、視訊(會議)室及簡報室。(八)教職員經常使用的共同使用空間是影印機、廁所、飲水機、活動中心及操場。
三、臺北市國民中學教職員運用學校知識管理空間情形:(一)學校網頁連結成功率高,部分網頁有動畫、有音樂載入讓人有互動感,但下載速度偶有遲滯現象、網站版面不常更新且計數器未準確記錄。(二)教務處使用公告系統最頻繁,其次是輔導室、訓導處,然而假期前後各處室更新篇數明顯下降。 (三)學校論壇發言次數較少、內容更新速度較慢,部分學校需要帳號與密碼,且多流於聊天功能較無知識性文章。(四)學校空間中運用知識管理步驟大部分進行第二步「獲取知識與運用知識」,尤其是在資訊管理系統(虛擬空間)及共同使用空間之中進行。(五)資訊管理系統進行「訂定知識目標與確認目標」、「獲取知識與運用知識」、在共同使用空間中進行「獲取知識與運用知識」、在教學空間中進行「知識發展與儲存知識」的情形顯著。(六)教師兼行政人員或服務年資五年以下的教職員,於學校空間中較會運用知識管理五步驟。(七)教師兼行政人員、服務年資五年以下的教職員及100人以下教師數的學校,較常於各學校空間運用知識管理步驟。
四、臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫影響因素與限制:(一)教職員規畫學校知識管理空間之主要影響因素依序為:「學校經費預算」、「教職員工作需求」、「教職員資訊科技能力」。(二) 教職員認為規畫資訊管理系統、行政空間及共同使用空間時應考量「學校經費預算」,其他空間依各職務有不同看法。 (三) 學校開放教學及共同使用空間供社區人士、學生家長共享的觀念已建立,但是資訊管理系統及行政空間的規畫有待加強。

根據文獻分析及研究結論,提出幾點建議學校規畫知識管理空間之參考:
(一)學校應重新審視學校空間配置以規畫知識管理空間,讓知識管理空間的特性促使學校成員有機會接觸新知;(二)教育局應積極推展資訊融入教學,並鼓勵各校落實e化教育;(三)學校成員應該可以自主管理學校空間與設備,並由學校調查「資訊管理系統與設備需求」;(四)應有專責人員負責全校資訊系統,以推動全校學習資訊生活化;(五)學校應讓圖書室升級且加速、加強圖書資訊系統,以創造學校成員進修空間與時間為各校積極發展的教學資源中心、進修中心,或教學與行政研究中心(六)多應用社區資源幫助學校擁有知識管理空間,社區融入校園提昇親、師、生彼此互動關係。
The purpose of this study mainly investigated the situation how middle school full-time administers, teachers having part-time position in administration and full-time teachers take the knowledge management to use school space and facilities in Taipei city, including average hours of using them a day, the degree of satisfaction and the influential elements. The questionnaire investigation, documents and archives analysis, observational technique and interview are used to help the study understand its limitation and the substantial methods of planning middle school knowledge space in the future Taipei city. About the data analysis, the study used Frequency Distribution, Percentile Points, F-test, Cochran Q test, χ2 test, Multivariate ANOVA, One-way ANOVA, Spearman Rank Correlation and Scheffé Method. Besides, the researcher also combined many interview records and pictures. The result of the study is as below:

A. The related concepts and studies of using knowledge management and planning school space:
1. Setting knowledge goal and knowledge identification, knowledge acquisition and knowledge utilization, knowledge sharing and distribution, knowledge development and knowledge retention, and knowledge assessment are five steps of knowledge management that make educational teams work efficiently.
2. School teaching and administrative staffs all take information management system as a spindle to develop many knowledge contents, like experimental learning and lifelong learning in the teaching, administrative and the common-use spaces.
B. The situation of using school spaces and facilities for middle school teaching and administrative staffs in Taipei city:
1. School teaching and administrative staffs can take good use of spaces and facilities for most people using information management system, and teachers having part-time position in administration take most time in administrative spaces and its facilities.
2. Most school teaching and administrative staffs satisfy the information management system on its fit-to-use degree, especially to the full-time administrators serving less than 5 years and teachers having part-time position in administration serving in larger size school.
3. About information management system, school teaching and administrative staffs always use on-line administrative announce, sign up or search on-line trainings, materials and test questions. About its facilities, they mainly use PC, notebooks, overhead sliders, printers and scanners.
4. School teaching and administrative staffs have the same situation while using information facilities in teaching and administrative spaces, but different space still has its different needs of information facilities, and people in different position also have different needs.
5. Full-time administrators have more opportunities to use vary information facilities; teachers having part-time position in administration and full-time teachers.
6. In teaching spaces, school teaching and administrative staffs always use ordinary classrooms, teacher office, audio-visual classroom, training classroom, material production classroom and library.
7. In administrative spaces, school teaching and administrative staffs always use offices, audio (meeting) room and reporting room.
8. In common-use spaces, school teaching and administrative staffs always use copy machines, washrooms, drinking fountains, activity center and playground.
C. The situation of using school knowledge management for middle school teaching and administrative staffs in Taipei city:
1. School websites have high percentage of successfully-link, but their download speed are sometimes slow for most of them having animating images and musical backgrounds; even people have more senses of interaction, school websites are seldom updated to a new version, and even the counters do not record the numbers of guests correctly.
2. The academic offices use on-line system of announcement more frequent than the consultant offices and discipline office; however, offices update quiet few announcements before or after the vacation.
3. In most school forums need people to apply an account and set a code, so there are few speakers, preferring chatting rather than sharing knowledge, seldom post a new content.
4. In school spaces, most people take second step of knowledge management, knowledge acquisition and knowledge utilization, especially they are using information management system (virtual space) and common-use spaces.
5. The situation of using information management system to set and identify knowledge goal or to do knowledge acquisition and knowledge utilization are quiet different from people doing knowledge acquisition and utilization in common-use spaces and doing knowledge development and development in teaching spaces.
6. Teachers having part-time position in administration or teachers serving less than 5 years take five steps of knowledge management much often.
7. Teachers having part-time position in administration, teachers serving less than 5 years, or teachers serving in school with less than 100 school teaching and administrative staffs much often take steps of knowledge management in every school space.

D. The influential elements and limitation to the middle school knowledge management space program in Taipei city:
1. Orderly, school teaching and administrative staffs, planning a knowledge management space are mainly influenced by school financial budget, the necessities, and the ability of using information technology.
2. School teaching and administrative staffs regard school financial budget as a key element while planning information management system, administrative and common-use spaces, but the viewpoint is different from other positions in other school spaces.
3. Schools open teaching and common-use spaces to communities and build up a sharing concept to parents; however, their information management system and administrative spaces still need to be improved.
According to the literature and study result, following suggestions are worth to be referred:
1. In order to plan knowledge manageable spaces, schools should re-examine its spatial arrangement to let the characteristics of knowledge management increase the chance of getting news to the school members.
2. The Bureau of Education should promote E-teaching and encourage every school to practice E-learning positively.
3. School members should have rights to management spaces and facilities on their own, and schools could investigate their needs while using information management system and facilities.
4. There should be a commissioner taking responsibilities for the school information system for promoting the concept of learning information daily.
5. Schools should speed up upgrading libraries and its information system to become a teaching center, a further study center or a research center of teaching that school members could have more spaces and time to further study in schools.be
6. Schools should take better use of community resources, even have communities in schools, to help themselves own a knowledge management space and get chances to improve the relationship between parents, teachers and students.
參考文獻 中文部分
丁金江(2001)。二十一世紀科技趨勢報告—資訊、電子與通訊。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會科學技術資料中心。
尤克強(2001)。知識管理與創新。臺北市:天下文化。
尤曉鈺(2001)。國民小學知識管理現況之調查研究 : 以臺北市和嘉義縣市為例。未出版碩士論文,國立中正大學,嘉義縣。
王如哲(2000)。知識管理的理論與應用-以教育領域及其革新為例。臺北市:五南。
王如哲(2002)。知識經濟與教育。臺北:五南。
王怡詠(2002)。知識經濟與學校經營創意。師說,168,28-34。
王政彥(1999)。自我學習與學習型組織。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編,學習型組織(第73-115頁)。臺北市:作者。
王淑懿(2001)。知識管理在教師進修機構應用之初探性研究。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學,臺北市。
王智勇(1991)。創新的組織:由資訊處理的觀點設計。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學,臺北市。
王誕生、林柏章(2001)。促進組織知識分享之策略,管理雜誌,323,114-118。
司徒達賢(2000)。管理挑戰新世紀。臺北市:天下雜誌。
伍忠賢(2001)。知識管理—策略與實務。臺北市:華泰。
伍忠賢、王建彬(2001)。知識管理策略與實務。臺北市:聯經。
江志正(1997)。策略管理在學校經營上的應用。臺中師院學報,11,167-194。
何宜玲譯(S. David著) (2001)。有效資訊科技。臺北市:智庫。
吳明清(1991)。教育研究:基本觀念與方法之分析。臺北市:五南。
吳迎春譯(A. Toffler著) (1991).大未來。臺北市:時報文化。
吳政達(2001)。知識管理在學校行政之應用。教育學刊,17,219-232。
吳清山(2001)。知識管理與學校效能。臺北市立師範學院學報,32,1-16。
吳清山、黃旭鈞(2000)。學校推動知識管理策略初探,教育研究,77,18-32。
吳毓琳(2001)。知識管理在國民中學學校行政應用之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
宋偉航譯(T. A. Stewart著) (1998)。智慧資本:資訊時代的企業利基。臺北市:智庫。
李聲吼(1997)。人力資源發展的意義與內涵。人力發展,36,28-35。
李华伟、董小英、左美雲、丘東江(2002)。知識管理的理論与實踐。北京市:華藝。
卓素珍(2001)。知識管理在教育上應用之研究。中學教育學報,8,25-143。
林文睿(1996)。英法圖書館建築設備概況。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館,2(3),1-26。
林海清(2000)。學校行政組織的行動學習。學校行政雙月刊,8,12-19。
林海清(2001)。知識管理與校園規劃。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編,e世紀的校園新貌(第83-90 頁)。臺北市:作者。
林麗惠(1999)。組織學習與學習型組織。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編,學習型組織(第117-153頁)。臺北市:作者。
知識經濟社會推動委員會(2002)。會議訊息。2002年12月25日,取自http://www.kbe-action.org.tw/。
邱慶平(2002)。北京大學的校園規畫與事業發展。載於大學的校園學術研討會論文,歷史的與新設的大學校園規畫與發展(第15-22頁)。臺北市:作者。
邱毅(2000)。現代管理學。臺北市:偉碩文化。
青木三十一(2001)。如何經營公司。臺北市:尼羅河書坊。
洪明洲譯(J. B. Quinn & J. Baruch & K. A. Zien著) (2000)。知識管理與創新。臺北市:商周。
洪榮昭(2001)。知識創新與學習型組織。臺北市:五南。
胡夢鯨(1999)。學習型學校的發展:以美國加速學校與我國補習學校為例。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編,學習型組織(第281-316頁)。臺北市:作者。
計惠卿(2001)。從知識管理看教育資源網站之規畫建置。中等教育,52(1),70-86。
祝智庭(2001)。教育信息化与教育改革。2002年12月26日,取自http://www.edu.cn/20011221/3014851_1.shtml。
秦夢群(2002)。知識經濟在教育發展上的角色與策略。教育論壇,53(3),64-82。
馬曉雲(2000)。知識管理實務應用。臺北市:華彩軟體。
高冀生、費曦強(2002)。北京大學的校園規畫與事業發展。載於大學的校園學術研討會論文,歷史的與新設的大學校園規畫與發展(第31-38頁)。臺北市:作者。
張玉文譯(H. D. Thomas & P. Laurence著) (1999)。知識管理。臺北市:中國生產力。
張玉文譯(P. F. Drucker et al.著) (2000)。知識管理。臺北市:天下文化。
張玉明譯(D. Aslett, & C. Cartaino著) (2001)。工作很簡單。臺北市:經典傳訊文化。
張志育(1998)。管理學。臺北縣:前程企業。
張志明、劉淑娟(2000)。知識管理在學校營繕工程之運用:以花蓮縣國民中小為例。花蓮師院學報,11,55-81。
張明輝(2002)。學校經營與管理研究。臺北市:學富文化。
張彥通、雷小玲、劉捷(2000)。英國高等教育”能力教育宣言”與”基於行動的學習”模式。比較教育研究,121。
教育部統計處國民中學校別資料(2002)。教育部統計處網站,2002年11月13日,取自http://140.111.1.22/school/index_b5.htm。
畢恆達(2001)。空間就是權力。臺北縣:心靈工坊。
許士軍(1985)。放眼世界談管理。臺北市:經濟與生活。
許史金譯(Arthur Andersen Business Consulting著) (2001)。知識管理推行實務。臺北市:商周。
陳文杰(1997)。技術類型、組織學習與人力資源管理之研究:以高科技企業為研究對象。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學,臺北市。
陳金貴(2001)。從人力資源發展看教育人員退休風潮。教育資料與研究,42,18-20。
陳海鳴(1999)。管理概論:理論與臺灣實證。臺北市:華泰文化。
陳煜清、施信華(2001)。人力資源管理對教育行政組織的啟示。學校行政雙月刊,15,60-65。
陳靉懿(2000)。建構全民行動學習資訊網。竹縣文教,22,43-51。
曾光榮、黃金印譯(H. Koontz & H. Weihrich) (2000)。管理學。臺北市:大揚。
湯志民(1994)。學校建築的人文教育環境規畫。初等教育學刊,34,237-264。
湯志民(1995)。本土教育的學校環境規畫。教育研究,46。20-34。
湯志民(1999)。學校空間革新思維—「人—境」互動。載於中華民國學校建築學會主編,二十一世紀學校建築與設施(第15-62頁)。臺北市:作者。
湯志民(2000)。學校建築與校園規畫。臺北市:五南。
湯志民(2001)。學校空間革新趨向之探析。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編,e世紀的校園新貌(第7-34頁)。臺北市:作者。
湯志民(2002a)。優質學校環境規畫之探析。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編,優質的學校環境(第1-39頁)。臺北:作者。
湯志民(2002b)。臺灣的學校建築。臺北市市:五南。
黃孟藩、趙葦、王鳳彬(1995)。管理概論。臺北市:五南。
黃富順(1999)。學習型組織緣起、意義、特性與實施。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編,學習型組織(第1-40頁)。臺北市:作者。
楊子江、王美音譯(I. Nonaka & H. Takeuchi著) (1997)。創新求勝:智價企業論。臺北市:遠流。
楊振富譯(S. Peter著) (2002a)。學習型學校(下)。臺北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:2000年)
楊振富譯(S. Peter著) (2002b)。學習型學校(下)。臺北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:2000年)
葉連祺(2001)。知識管理應用於教育之課題與因應策略。教育研究,89,32-42。
臺北市中山國中(2002)。臺北市國民中學校務評鑑。2002年12月21日,取自http://tpjhmail138.csjhs.tp.edu.tw/教務處/臺北市國民中學校務評鑑/。
趙家麟(1998)。校園規畫的時空觀—普林斯頓大學二百五十年校園的探討與省思。臺北市:田園城市文化。
劉兆漢(2001)。轉知識為利潤—創新才是原動力。2003年7月10日,取自http://doc.money.udn.com/udndoc/feather01/01042413/8.htm。
劉京偉譯(Arthur Andersen Business Consulting著) (2000)。知識管理的第一本書。臺北市:商周。
劉常勇、李書政譯(H. Thomas & H. B. Arthur著) (2002)。知識管理:理論、評估、應用。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。
劉毓玲譯(P. F. Drucker著) (2000)。21世紀的管理挑戰。臺北市:天下遠見。
蔡保田(1977)。學校建築學。臺北市:正中書局。
薛迪安譯(C. N. Parkinson著) (1997)。面對管理時代的大師。臺北縣:新雨。
顧淑馨譯(J. S. Brown & D. Paul著) (2001)。資訊革命了什麼。臺北市:先覺。
Michael Wilford聯合建築師事務所(1997)。新加坡temasak工藝學校。建築,008,16-23。
Perkins & Will建築事務所(1997)。Singapore American School。建築,008,42-55。
英文部分
Alvarez, P. (2001). Your supply chain management strategy must include the flow of education. Frontline solutions, 2(13), 36-37.
American School & University (1999a). Outstanding Buildings. American School & University , 72(3), 179-217.
American School & University (1999b). Outstanding Buildings. American School & University ,72(3), 261-289.
Andrew, H. G., Arvind, M., & Albert, H. S. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.
Baines, L., Muire, C., & Stanley, G. (1999). The public school as wasteland. Contemporary Education, 70(2), 18-24.
Benson, P., Peltier, G. L., & Matranga, M. (1999). Moving school administrators into the computer age. Education, 120(2), 326-335.
Berrell, M., Wrathall, J., & Wright, P. (2001). A model for Chinese management education: adapting the case study method to transfer management knowledge. Cross Culture Management, 8(1), 28-44.
Borghoff, U., & Pareschi, R. (1998). Information technology for knowledge management. NY: Springer.
Broadbent, M. (1998). The phenomenon of knowledge management: What does it mean to the information profession? Information Outlook, 2(5), 23-36.
Buchanan, L. E., Luck, D. L., & Jones, T. C.(2002). Integrating information literacy into the virtual university: A course model. Library Trends, 51(2), 144-167.
Clegg, S. (1999). Global zing the intelligent organization: Learning organizations, smart workers, (not so) clever countries and the sociological imagination. Management Learning, 30(3), 259-280.
Crane, S. (2000). Unconventional offerings. American School & University, 72(2), 169-173.
Dalin, P. (1998). School Development: Theories and Strategies. An International Handbook. School Development Series. United Kingdom, England:Earlier versions of these chapters published in Oslo (Norway). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 426 060).
Davenport, E., & Bruce, I.(2001). Innovation, knowledge management and the use of space: Questioning assumptions about non-traditional office work. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 225-230.
David, H. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122-144.
Donahue, K. B. (2001). Knowledge management beyond databases. Harvard Business, U0105C, 3-4.
Educational facilities-new concepts in architecture & design (1994). Tokyo:Meisei.
Elisabeth, D., & Isabel, B. (2002). Innovation, knowledge management and the use of space: questioning assumptions about non-traditional office work. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 225-230.
Fantz, R. (2001). Knowledge Management in academic libraries: Special tools and process to support information professionals. Reference Services Review, 29(1), 33-39.
Gaffen Y. (2000). Streamlining construction, American School & University, 73(3), 400-401.
George, T. (2003). Educational advantage. Information Week, 930, 57-58.
Gilbert, P., Steffen R., & Kai R. (2001). Managing knowledge-building blocks for success. Wiley, England: Chichester.
Gore, C., & Gore, E. (1999). Total quality management: The way forward. Total Quality Management, 10(4/5), 554-560.
Hane P. J. (2003). Visualizing online information. Information Today, 20(5), 5.
Hart, S. (2001). A new era in school construction begins. Architectural Record, 189(2), 155-160.
Hauschild, S.& Licht, T.,& Stein, W. (2001). Creating a knowledge culture. The Mckinsey Quarterly, 1, 74-81.
Husement, R. C.(1999). Leading with knowledge:The nature of competition in the 21st century. London: SAGE.
Kennedy, S. D. (2003). Computers in libraries. Information Today, 20(5), 2.
Kuo, Y. F. (2003). A study on service quality of virtual community. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(4), 461-473.
Lee S. J., & Valderrama K. ( 2003). Building successful communities of practice. Information Outlook, 7(5), 28-29.
Mateo S. (2003). Knowledge culture. Intelligent Enterprise, 6(8), 12-13.
McKenzie, J., & Truc, A., & Winkelen, C. (2001). Winning commitment for knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Change Management, 2(2), 115-127.
Michael, B. (2001). The very big picture. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 12(2). 213-228.
Mike, K. (2000). Lockers: An open door. American School & University, 73(4), 23-26.
Myriam, G. (2002). Quality control in information service for development. Information Development, 8(3), 167-169.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. NY: Oxford University.
O’Dell, C., Wiig, K., & Odem, P. (1999). Benchmarking unveils emerging knowledge management strategies. Benchmarking an International Journal, 6(3), 202-211.
O’Dell, O. (1998). If only we know what we know: the transfer of internal knowledge and best practice, N.Y.: The Free Press.
Passantino, R. (2000). American trends in school design: How learning in the 21st century will affect school design. Intercultural Education, 11(1), 7-17.
Peter, J. C., & Joseph, M. S. (2000). Perspectives on the urban school principal ship. Education & Urban Society, 32(4), 435-443.
Peter, M., & Robert, S. (2000). View of organizational knowledge management systems. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3). 224-234.
Phillip C. S. (2001). Inventing better school: an action plan for educational reform. C.A.: Jossey-Bass.
President and fellows of Harvard College (2000). Knowledge management: 4 obstacles to overcome. Harvard Business School, U0008B, 3-4.
Richard, D. R. (2001). Technology: Where students learn. American School & University, 47(3), 360-363.
Scheckler, R. & Barab, S. (2002). Online communities: commerce, community action, and the virtual university. The Information Society, 18(4), 303-305.
Schulz, C. D. (1999). Developing and advocacy plan for the school library media center. Book Report, 18(3), 19-22.
Shabha G. (2000). Virtual universities in the third millennium: An assessment of the implications of teleworking on university buildings and space planning. Facilities, 18(5/6), 235-244.
Siderio, F., & Yaldezian, C. (2003). Software can help optimize supplier relationships and spending. National Underwriter, 107(19), 20-22.
Stevenson, J. M., & Dunn, R. S. (2001). Knowledge management and learning styles: Prescriptions for future teachers. College Student Journal, 35(4), 483-490.
Technology for older schools(1997). American School & University, 69(10), 54-55.
Torraco, R. (1999). The theory of knowledge management. In Academy of Human Resource Development (AHRD) Conference Proceedings: Knowledge Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 431 948).
Uline, C. L. (2000). Decent facilities and learning: Thirman A. Milner elementary school and beyond. Teachers College Record, 102(2). 442-460.
Walsh, M. (2003). Private management of schools. Education Week, 29(17), 17.
Walsham, G. (2001). Knowledge management: The benefits and limitations of computer systems. Knowledge Management, 19(6), 599-608.
Wiig, K. M. (1994). Knowledge management. Arlinton, Texas: Schema.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
90152008
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090152008
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 湯志民zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 謝佩璇zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsieh, Pei-Hsuanen_US
dc.creator (作者) 謝佩璇zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsieh, Pei-Hsuanen_US
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 14:57:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 14:57:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 14:57:03 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0090152008en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32955-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 90152008zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要目的在探討臺北市國民中學的行政人員、教師兼行政人員及專任教師使用學校空間與設備及運用知識管理的情形,包括使用的每天平均時數、使用滿意度,並探討其認為規畫學校空間應考慮的重要因素,以問卷調查法、檔案資料內容分析法、觀察法、訪談法來分析未來知識管理空間的具體作為及可能的侷限性。在資料分析上,問卷調查以次數分配、百分率統計、F檢定、Cochran Q考驗、卡方考驗、多變量變異數分析、單變量變異數分析、單因子變異數分析、Spearman等級相關及Scheffé事後比較;檔案資料內容分析以次數、百分率作記錄說明;觀察及訪談以整理圖文記錄說明,最後研究結果發現:
一、知識管理運用及學校空間規畫上的相關概念及研究:(一)知識管理以訂定知識目標與確認知識、獲取知識與運用知識、知識分享與傳播、知識發展與儲存知識、評價與量測知識五步驟讓教育團隊經營有效率。(二)學校教職員在教學空間、行政空間及共同使用空間,皆以資訊管理系統為主軸發展經驗式學習、終身學習等知識內容。
二、臺北市國民中學教職員對學校空間與設備使用情形:(一)教職員對空間與設備能善加利用,使用資訊管理系統人數最多,教師兼行政人員使用行政空間與設備的時間最長。(二)資訊管理系統的堪用程度普遍受到教職員肯定,以服務年資五年以下的行政人員、教師兼行政人員在校舍面積大者對堪用程度最滿意。(三)教職員經常使用行政公佈欄、線上研習報名及查詢、線上教學教材或試題等資訊管理系統;設備以桌上型電腦、筆記型電腦、單槍投影機、印表機、掃瞄器為主。(四)教職員在教學空間及行政空間使用資訊設備情形相同,然而在不同空間有不同資訊設備配置需求、不同職務亦有不同需求程度。(五)行政人員較有機會使用各種資訊設備,其次是教師兼行政人員及專任教師。(六)教職員經常使用的教學空間是普通教室、教師辦公室、視聽教室、專科教室、教材製作室及圖書室。(七)教職員經常使用的行政空間是辦公處室、視訊(會議)室及簡報室。(八)教職員經常使用的共同使用空間是影印機、廁所、飲水機、活動中心及操場。
三、臺北市國民中學教職員運用學校知識管理空間情形:(一)學校網頁連結成功率高,部分網頁有動畫、有音樂載入讓人有互動感,但下載速度偶有遲滯現象、網站版面不常更新且計數器未準確記錄。(二)教務處使用公告系統最頻繁,其次是輔導室、訓導處,然而假期前後各處室更新篇數明顯下降。 (三)學校論壇發言次數較少、內容更新速度較慢,部分學校需要帳號與密碼,且多流於聊天功能較無知識性文章。(四)學校空間中運用知識管理步驟大部分進行第二步「獲取知識與運用知識」,尤其是在資訊管理系統(虛擬空間)及共同使用空間之中進行。(五)資訊管理系統進行「訂定知識目標與確認目標」、「獲取知識與運用知識」、在共同使用空間中進行「獲取知識與運用知識」、在教學空間中進行「知識發展與儲存知識」的情形顯著。(六)教師兼行政人員或服務年資五年以下的教職員,於學校空間中較會運用知識管理五步驟。(七)教師兼行政人員、服務年資五年以下的教職員及100人以下教師數的學校,較常於各學校空間運用知識管理步驟。
四、臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫影響因素與限制:(一)教職員規畫學校知識管理空間之主要影響因素依序為:「學校經費預算」、「教職員工作需求」、「教職員資訊科技能力」。(二) 教職員認為規畫資訊管理系統、行政空間及共同使用空間時應考量「學校經費預算」,其他空間依各職務有不同看法。 (三) 學校開放教學及共同使用空間供社區人士、學生家長共享的觀念已建立,但是資訊管理系統及行政空間的規畫有待加強。

根據文獻分析及研究結論,提出幾點建議學校規畫知識管理空間之參考:
(一)學校應重新審視學校空間配置以規畫知識管理空間,讓知識管理空間的特性促使學校成員有機會接觸新知;(二)教育局應積極推展資訊融入教學,並鼓勵各校落實e化教育;(三)學校成員應該可以自主管理學校空間與設備,並由學校調查「資訊管理系統與設備需求」;(四)應有專責人員負責全校資訊系統,以推動全校學習資訊生活化;(五)學校應讓圖書室升級且加速、加強圖書資訊系統,以創造學校成員進修空間與時間為各校積極發展的教學資源中心、進修中心,或教學與行政研究中心(六)多應用社區資源幫助學校擁有知識管理空間,社區融入校園提昇親、師、生彼此互動關係。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The purpose of this study mainly investigated the situation how middle school full-time administers, teachers having part-time position in administration and full-time teachers take the knowledge management to use school space and facilities in Taipei city, including average hours of using them a day, the degree of satisfaction and the influential elements. The questionnaire investigation, documents and archives analysis, observational technique and interview are used to help the study understand its limitation and the substantial methods of planning middle school knowledge space in the future Taipei city. About the data analysis, the study used Frequency Distribution, Percentile Points, F-test, Cochran Q test, χ2 test, Multivariate ANOVA, One-way ANOVA, Spearman Rank Correlation and Scheffé Method. Besides, the researcher also combined many interview records and pictures. The result of the study is as below:

A. The related concepts and studies of using knowledge management and planning school space:
1. Setting knowledge goal and knowledge identification, knowledge acquisition and knowledge utilization, knowledge sharing and distribution, knowledge development and knowledge retention, and knowledge assessment are five steps of knowledge management that make educational teams work efficiently.
2. School teaching and administrative staffs all take information management system as a spindle to develop many knowledge contents, like experimental learning and lifelong learning in the teaching, administrative and the common-use spaces.
B. The situation of using school spaces and facilities for middle school teaching and administrative staffs in Taipei city:
1. School teaching and administrative staffs can take good use of spaces and facilities for most people using information management system, and teachers having part-time position in administration take most time in administrative spaces and its facilities.
2. Most school teaching and administrative staffs satisfy the information management system on its fit-to-use degree, especially to the full-time administrators serving less than 5 years and teachers having part-time position in administration serving in larger size school.
3. About information management system, school teaching and administrative staffs always use on-line administrative announce, sign up or search on-line trainings, materials and test questions. About its facilities, they mainly use PC, notebooks, overhead sliders, printers and scanners.
4. School teaching and administrative staffs have the same situation while using information facilities in teaching and administrative spaces, but different space still has its different needs of information facilities, and people in different position also have different needs.
5. Full-time administrators have more opportunities to use vary information facilities; teachers having part-time position in administration and full-time teachers.
6. In teaching spaces, school teaching and administrative staffs always use ordinary classrooms, teacher office, audio-visual classroom, training classroom, material production classroom and library.
7. In administrative spaces, school teaching and administrative staffs always use offices, audio (meeting) room and reporting room.
8. In common-use spaces, school teaching and administrative staffs always use copy machines, washrooms, drinking fountains, activity center and playground.
C. The situation of using school knowledge management for middle school teaching and administrative staffs in Taipei city:
1. School websites have high percentage of successfully-link, but their download speed are sometimes slow for most of them having animating images and musical backgrounds; even people have more senses of interaction, school websites are seldom updated to a new version, and even the counters do not record the numbers of guests correctly.
2. The academic offices use on-line system of announcement more frequent than the consultant offices and discipline office; however, offices update quiet few announcements before or after the vacation.
3. In most school forums need people to apply an account and set a code, so there are few speakers, preferring chatting rather than sharing knowledge, seldom post a new content.
4. In school spaces, most people take second step of knowledge management, knowledge acquisition and knowledge utilization, especially they are using information management system (virtual space) and common-use spaces.
5. The situation of using information management system to set and identify knowledge goal or to do knowledge acquisition and knowledge utilization are quiet different from people doing knowledge acquisition and utilization in common-use spaces and doing knowledge development and development in teaching spaces.
6. Teachers having part-time position in administration or teachers serving less than 5 years take five steps of knowledge management much often.
7. Teachers having part-time position in administration, teachers serving less than 5 years, or teachers serving in school with less than 100 school teaching and administrative staffs much often take steps of knowledge management in every school space.

D. The influential elements and limitation to the middle school knowledge management space program in Taipei city:
1. Orderly, school teaching and administrative staffs, planning a knowledge management space are mainly influenced by school financial budget, the necessities, and the ability of using information technology.
2. School teaching and administrative staffs regard school financial budget as a key element while planning information management system, administrative and common-use spaces, but the viewpoint is different from other positions in other school spaces.
3. Schools open teaching and common-use spaces to communities and build up a sharing concept to parents; however, their information management system and administrative spaces still need to be improved.
According to the literature and study result, following suggestions are worth to be referred:
1. In order to plan knowledge manageable spaces, schools should re-examine its spatial arrangement to let the characteristics of knowledge management increase the chance of getting news to the school members.
2. The Bureau of Education should promote E-teaching and encourage every school to practice E-learning positively.
3. School members should have rights to management spaces and facilities on their own, and schools could investigate their needs while using information management system and facilities.
4. There should be a commissioner taking responsibilities for the school information system for promoting the concept of learning information daily.
5. Schools should speed up upgrading libraries and its information system to become a teaching center, a further study center or a research center of teaching that school members could have more spaces and time to further study in schools.be
6. Schools should take better use of community resources, even have communities in schools, to help themselves own a knowledge management space and get chances to improve the relationship between parents, teachers and students.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究動機與目的……………………………………………..……….….1
第二節 研究問題……………………………………………………..……….….4
第三節 重要名詞釋義……………………………………………..………..…....5
第四節 研究範圍與限制……………………………………………..……….….7
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 知識管理概念與相關理論分析………………………………………..11
第二節 知識管理與學校空間規畫理念……………………………………......48
第三節 學校知識管理空間規畫的研究……………………………………..…71
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究架構………………………………………………………………..93
第二節 研究對象………………………………………………………………..97
第三節 研究工具………………………………………………………………..99
第四節 實施程序……………………………………………………………....102
第五節 資料處理………………………………………………………………104
第四章 研究結果分析與討論
第一節 臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫問卷調查結果分析與討論……109
第二節 臺北市國民中學運用資訊管理系統情形文件結果分析與討論…....162
第三節 臺北市國民中學運用學校空間與設備之觀察結果分析與討論…....170
第四節 四所臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫訪談結果分析與討論…....205
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論…………………………………………………………………....227
第二節 建議……………………………………………………………………238

參考文獻………………………………………………………...…………...…...246
附錄
附錄一 臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫之研究問卷調查表………......254
附錄二 臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫之研究訪談大綱…………......261
附錄三 臺北市國民中學網站架構及使用情形調查表……..…..……….….263
附錄四 臺北市國民中學網站架構及使用情形調查彙整表……………......265
附錄五 臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫之研究訪談稿……………......266
附錄六 臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫之研究問卷調查表
(開放問答) ……..……...……………………………………….…….276
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 8959 bytes-
dc.format.extent 10849 bytes-
dc.format.extent 24658 bytes-
dc.format.extent 19018 bytes-
dc.format.extent 27055 bytes-
dc.format.extent 275657 bytes-
dc.format.extent 161335 bytes-
dc.format.extent 776346 bytes-
dc.format.extent 49419 bytes-
dc.format.extent 36520 bytes-
dc.format.extent 102373 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090152008en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識管理zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學校空間zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 知識管理空間規畫zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 臺北市國民中學知識管理空間規畫之研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 丁金江(2001)。二十一世紀科技趨勢報告—資訊、電子與通訊。臺北市:行政院國家科學委員會科學技術資料中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 尤克強(2001)。知識管理與創新。臺北市:天下文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 尤曉鈺(2001)。國民小學知識管理現況之調查研究 : 以臺北市和嘉義縣市為例。未出版碩士論文,國立中正大學,嘉義縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王如哲(2000)。知識管理的理論與應用-以教育領域及其革新為例。臺北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王如哲(2002)。知識經濟與教育。臺北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王怡詠(2002)。知識經濟與學校經營創意。師說,168,28-34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王政彥(1999)。自我學習與學習型組織。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編,學習型組織(第73-115頁)。臺北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王淑懿(2001)。知識管理在教師進修機構應用之初探性研究。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王智勇(1991)。創新的組織:由資訊處理的觀點設計。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王誕生、林柏章(2001)。促進組織知識分享之策略,管理雜誌,323,114-118。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 司徒達賢(2000)。管理挑戰新世紀。臺北市:天下雜誌。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 伍忠賢(2001)。知識管理—策略與實務。臺北市:華泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 伍忠賢、王建彬(2001)。知識管理策略與實務。臺北市:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江志正(1997)。策略管理在學校經營上的應用。臺中師院學報,11,167-194。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 何宜玲譯(S. David著) (2001)。有效資訊科技。臺北市:智庫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳明清(1991)。教育研究:基本觀念與方法之分析。臺北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳迎春譯(A. Toffler著) (1991).大未來。臺北市:時報文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳政達(2001)。知識管理在學校行政之應用。教育學刊,17,219-232。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山(2001)。知識管理與學校效能。臺北市立師範學院學報,32,1-16。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山、黃旭鈞(2000)。學校推動知識管理策略初探,教育研究,77,18-32。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳毓琳(2001)。知識管理在國民中學學校行政應用之研究。未出版碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 宋偉航譯(T. A. Stewart著) (1998)。智慧資本:資訊時代的企業利基。臺北市:智庫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李聲吼(1997)。人力資源發展的意義與內涵。人力發展,36,28-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李华伟、董小英、左美雲、丘東江(2002)。知識管理的理論与實踐。北京市:華藝。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 卓素珍(2001)。知識管理在教育上應用之研究。中學教育學報,8,25-143。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林文睿(1996)。英法圖書館建築設備概況。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館,2(3),1-26。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林海清(2000)。學校行政組織的行動學習。學校行政雙月刊,8,12-19。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林海清(2001)。知識管理與校園規劃。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編,e世紀的校園新貌(第83-90 頁)。臺北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林麗惠(1999)。組織學習與學習型組織。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編,學習型組織(第117-153頁)。臺北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 知識經濟社會推動委員會(2002)。會議訊息。2002年12月25日,取自http://www.kbe-action.org.tw/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱慶平(2002)。北京大學的校園規畫與事業發展。載於大學的校園學術研討會論文,歷史的與新設的大學校園規畫與發展(第15-22頁)。臺北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 邱毅(2000)。現代管理學。臺北市:偉碩文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 青木三十一(2001)。如何經營公司。臺北市:尼羅河書坊。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪明洲譯(J. B. Quinn & J. Baruch & K. A. Zien著) (2000)。知識管理與創新。臺北市:商周。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪榮昭(2001)。知識創新與學習型組織。臺北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡夢鯨(1999)。學習型學校的發展:以美國加速學校與我國補習學校為例。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編,學習型組織(第281-316頁)。臺北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 計惠卿(2001)。從知識管理看教育資源網站之規畫建置。中等教育,52(1),70-86。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 祝智庭(2001)。教育信息化与教育改革。2002年12月26日,取自http://www.edu.cn/20011221/3014851_1.shtml。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦夢群(2002)。知識經濟在教育發展上的角色與策略。教育論壇,53(3),64-82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬曉雲(2000)。知識管理實務應用。臺北市:華彩軟體。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高冀生、費曦強(2002)。北京大學的校園規畫與事業發展。載於大學的校園學術研討會論文,歷史的與新設的大學校園規畫與發展(第31-38頁)。臺北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張玉文譯(H. D. Thomas & P. Laurence著) (1999)。知識管理。臺北市:中國生產力。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張玉文譯(P. F. Drucker et al.著) (2000)。知識管理。臺北市:天下文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張玉明譯(D. Aslett, & C. Cartaino著) (2001)。工作很簡單。臺北市:經典傳訊文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張志育(1998)。管理學。臺北縣:前程企業。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張志明、劉淑娟(2000)。知識管理在學校營繕工程之運用:以花蓮縣國民中小為例。花蓮師院學報,11,55-81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張明輝(2002)。學校經營與管理研究。臺北市:學富文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張彥通、雷小玲、劉捷(2000)。英國高等教育”能力教育宣言”與”基於行動的學習”模式。比較教育研究,121。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 教育部統計處國民中學校別資料(2002)。教育部統計處網站,2002年11月13日,取自http://140.111.1.22/school/index_b5.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 畢恆達(2001)。空間就是權力。臺北縣:心靈工坊。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許士軍(1985)。放眼世界談管理。臺北市:經濟與生活。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許史金譯(Arthur Andersen Business Consulting著) (2001)。知識管理推行實務。臺北市:商周。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳文杰(1997)。技術類型、組織學習與人力資源管理之研究:以高科技企業為研究對象。未出版碩士論文,國立政治大學,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳金貴(2001)。從人力資源發展看教育人員退休風潮。教育資料與研究,42,18-20。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳海鳴(1999)。管理概論:理論與臺灣實證。臺北市:華泰文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳煜清、施信華(2001)。人力資源管理對教育行政組織的啟示。學校行政雙月刊,15,60-65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳靉懿(2000)。建構全民行動學習資訊網。竹縣文教,22,43-51。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曾光榮、黃金印譯(H. Koontz & H. Weihrich) (2000)。管理學。臺北市:大揚。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯志民(1994)。學校建築的人文教育環境規畫。初等教育學刊,34,237-264。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯志民(1995)。本土教育的學校環境規畫。教育研究,46。20-34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯志民(1999)。學校空間革新思維—「人—境」互動。載於中華民國學校建築學會主編,二十一世紀學校建築與設施(第15-62頁)。臺北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯志民(2000)。學校建築與校園規畫。臺北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯志民(2001)。學校空間革新趨向之探析。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編,e世紀的校園新貌(第7-34頁)。臺北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯志民(2002a)。優質學校環境規畫之探析。載於中華民國學校建築研究學會主編,優質的學校環境(第1-39頁)。臺北:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯志民(2002b)。臺灣的學校建築。臺北市市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃孟藩、趙葦、王鳳彬(1995)。管理概論。臺北市:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃富順(1999)。學習型組織緣起、意義、特性與實施。載於中華民國成人教育學會主編,學習型組織(第1-40頁)。臺北市:作者。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊子江、王美音譯(I. Nonaka & H. Takeuchi著) (1997)。創新求勝:智價企業論。臺北市:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊振富譯(S. Peter著) (2002a)。學習型學校(下)。臺北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:2000年)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊振富譯(S. Peter著) (2002b)。學習型學校(下)。臺北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:2000年)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 葉連祺(2001)。知識管理應用於教育之課題與因應策略。教育研究,89,32-42。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 臺北市中山國中(2002)。臺北市國民中學校務評鑑。2002年12月21日,取自http://tpjhmail138.csjhs.tp.edu.tw/教務處/臺北市國民中學校務評鑑/。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 趙家麟(1998)。校園規畫的時空觀—普林斯頓大學二百五十年校園的探討與省思。臺北市:田園城市文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉兆漢(2001)。轉知識為利潤—創新才是原動力。2003年7月10日,取自http://doc.money.udn.com/udndoc/feather01/01042413/8.htm。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉京偉譯(Arthur Andersen Business Consulting著) (2000)。知識管理的第一本書。臺北市:商周。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉常勇、李書政譯(H. Thomas & H. B. Arthur著) (2002)。知識管理:理論、評估、應用。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉毓玲譯(P. F. Drucker著) (2000)。21世紀的管理挑戰。臺北市:天下遠見。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡保田(1977)。學校建築學。臺北市:正中書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 薛迪安譯(C. N. Parkinson著) (1997)。面對管理時代的大師。臺北縣:新雨。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 顧淑馨譯(J. S. Brown & D. Paul著) (2001)。資訊革命了什麼。臺北市:先覺。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Michael Wilford聯合建築師事務所(1997)。新加坡temasak工藝學校。建築,008,16-23。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Perkins & Will建築事務所(1997)。Singapore American School。建築,008,42-55。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alvarez, P. (2001). Your supply chain management strategy must include the flow of education. Frontline solutions, 2(13), 36-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American School & University (1999a). Outstanding Buildings. American School & University , 72(3), 179-217.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American School & University (1999b). Outstanding Buildings. American School & University ,72(3), 261-289.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Andrew, H. G., Arvind, M., & Albert, H. S. (2001). Knowledge management: An organizational capabilities perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 185-214.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baines, L., Muire, C., & Stanley, G. (1999). The public school as wasteland. Contemporary Education, 70(2), 18-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Benson, P., Peltier, G. L., & Matranga, M. (1999). Moving school administrators into the computer age. Education, 120(2), 326-335.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berrell, M., Wrathall, J., & Wright, P. (2001). A model for Chinese management education: adapting the case study method to transfer management knowledge. Cross Culture Management, 8(1), 28-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Borghoff, U., & Pareschi, R. (1998). Information technology for knowledge management. NY: Springer.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Broadbent, M. (1998). The phenomenon of knowledge management: What does it mean to the information profession? Information Outlook, 2(5), 23-36.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Buchanan, L. E., Luck, D. L., & Jones, T. C.(2002). Integrating information literacy into the virtual university: A course model. Library Trends, 51(2), 144-167.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clegg, S. (1999). Global zing the intelligent organization: Learning organizations, smart workers, (not so) clever countries and the sociological imagination. Management Learning, 30(3), 259-280.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Crane, S. (2000). Unconventional offerings. American School & University, 72(2), 169-173.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dalin, P. (1998). School Development: Theories and Strategies. An International Handbook. School Development Series. United Kingdom, England:Earlier versions of these chapters published in Oslo (Norway). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 426 060).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Davenport, E., & Bruce, I.(2001). Innovation, knowledge management and the use of space: Questioning assumptions about non-traditional office work. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 225-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) David, H. H. (1999). The knowledge-creating school. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(2), 122-144.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Donahue, K. B. (2001). Knowledge management beyond databases. Harvard Business, U0105C, 3-4.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Educational facilities-new concepts in architecture & design (1994). Tokyo:Meisei.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Elisabeth, D., & Isabel, B. (2002). Innovation, knowledge management and the use of space: questioning assumptions about non-traditional office work. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 225-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fantz, R. (2001). Knowledge Management in academic libraries: Special tools and process to support information professionals. Reference Services Review, 29(1), 33-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gaffen Y. (2000). Streamlining construction, American School & University, 73(3), 400-401.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) George, T. (2003). Educational advantage. Information Week, 930, 57-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gilbert, P., Steffen R., & Kai R. (2001). Managing knowledge-building blocks for success. Wiley, England: Chichester.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gore, C., & Gore, E. (1999). Total quality management: The way forward. Total Quality Management, 10(4/5), 554-560.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hane P. J. (2003). Visualizing online information. Information Today, 20(5), 5.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hart, S. (2001). A new era in school construction begins. Architectural Record, 189(2), 155-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hauschild, S.& Licht, T.,& Stein, W. (2001). Creating a knowledge culture. The Mckinsey Quarterly, 1, 74-81.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Husement, R. C.(1999). Leading with knowledge:The nature of competition in the 21st century. London: SAGE.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kennedy, S. D. (2003). Computers in libraries. Information Today, 20(5), 2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kuo, Y. F. (2003). A study on service quality of virtual community. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(4), 461-473.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lee S. J., & Valderrama K. ( 2003). Building successful communities of practice. Information Outlook, 7(5), 28-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mateo S. (2003). Knowledge culture. Intelligent Enterprise, 6(8), 12-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McKenzie, J., & Truc, A., & Winkelen, C. (2001). Winning commitment for knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Change Management, 2(2), 115-127.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Michael, B. (2001). The very big picture. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 12(2). 213-228.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mike, K. (2000). Lockers: An open door. American School & University, 73(4), 23-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myriam, G. (2002). Quality control in information service for development. Information Development, 8(3), 167-169.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company. NY: Oxford University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Dell, C., Wiig, K., & Odem, P. (1999). Benchmarking unveils emerging knowledge management strategies. Benchmarking an International Journal, 6(3), 202-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) O’Dell, O. (1998). If only we know what we know: the transfer of internal knowledge and best practice, N.Y.: The Free Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Passantino, R. (2000). American trends in school design: How learning in the 21st century will affect school design. Intercultural Education, 11(1), 7-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peter, J. C., & Joseph, M. S. (2000). Perspectives on the urban school principal ship. Education & Urban Society, 32(4), 435-443.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Peter, M., & Robert, S. (2000). View of organizational knowledge management systems. Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(3). 224-234.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Phillip C. S. (2001). Inventing better school: an action plan for educational reform. C.A.: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) President and fellows of Harvard College (2000). Knowledge management: 4 obstacles to overcome. Harvard Business School, U0008B, 3-4.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Richard, D. R. (2001). Technology: Where students learn. American School & University, 47(3), 360-363.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scheckler, R. & Barab, S. (2002). Online communities: commerce, community action, and the virtual university. The Information Society, 18(4), 303-305.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schulz, C. D. (1999). Developing and advocacy plan for the school library media center. Book Report, 18(3), 19-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shabha G. (2000). Virtual universities in the third millennium: An assessment of the implications of teleworking on university buildings and space planning. Facilities, 18(5/6), 235-244.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Siderio, F., & Yaldezian, C. (2003). Software can help optimize supplier relationships and spending. National Underwriter, 107(19), 20-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stevenson, J. M., & Dunn, R. S. (2001). Knowledge management and learning styles: Prescriptions for future teachers. College Student Journal, 35(4), 483-490.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Technology for older schools(1997). American School & University, 69(10), 54-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Torraco, R. (1999). The theory of knowledge management. In Academy of Human Resource Development (AHRD) Conference Proceedings: Knowledge Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 431 948).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Uline, C. L. (2000). Decent facilities and learning: Thirman A. Milner elementary school and beyond. Teachers College Record, 102(2). 442-460.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walsh, M. (2003). Private management of schools. Education Week, 29(17), 17.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walsham, G. (2001). Knowledge management: The benefits and limitations of computer systems. Knowledge Management, 19(6), 599-608.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wiig, K. M. (1994). Knowledge management. Arlinton, Texas: Schema.zh_TW