學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 臺北縣公立高級中等學校公辦民營經營型態評估研究
Evaluation on the Models of Private Management of Public High Schools in Taipei County
作者 鍾欣儒
Chung, Hsin Ju
貢獻者 吳政達
Wu, Cheng Ta
鍾欣儒
Chung, Hsin Ju
關鍵詞 學校公辦民營
模糊德菲術
特許學校模式
契約政體模式
private management of public school
Fuzzy Delphi method
Charter school model
Contract management model
日期 2007
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 15:02:16 (UTC+8)
摘要 本研究主要目的在於臺北縣升格為準直轄市的背景下探討:(1) 分析臺北縣高中職實施公辦民營之內部、外部效益;(2)評估臺北縣公立高中職公辦民營之可行性;(3) 評估臺北縣公立高中職公辦民營之可行模式;(4) 建構臺北縣公立高中職公辦民營的推動策略;(5)探討民間參與學校公辦民營的動機;(6)分析臺北縣推動公立高中職公辦民營可行區域。希望政府藉由積極結合民間資源共同辦理公共事務,以公辦民營的手段,將民間的管理專業觀念、做法及資金,正面影響學校行政結構、學校經營模式,達成最佳的學校經營成效。
本研究法採文獻分析法、模糊德菲術,針對學校公辦民營的理論、模式、政策與實施四種向度進行探究。研究結果歸納如下:
1.臺北縣實施公立高中職公辦民營之效益為藉由鼓勵民間共同參與辦學,降低財政負擔,以及增加學校多角化經營空間,提供家長多樣化的教育選擇機會。
2.經營型態以特許學校、契約政體模式最為可行。
3.臺北縣於高中職實施的選擇上,以職業學校為優先。
4.臺北縣公辦民營學校之經費來源、財務審計規範、課程與教學、人事運作等應該擁有自主權。
5.臺北縣行政機關應加速研擬公立高中職公辦民營專屬法規。
6.臺北縣政府應建立相關的監督及輔導評鑑的制度,評鑑部分需含自我評鑑及行政機關評鑑,並將評鑑結果公佈。
7.臺北縣新莊市擁有推動公立高中職教育公辦民營的先行試辦優勢。
On the background of the Taipei County elevating status to “Quasi-Direct-controlled municipality”, the purposes of the research are as follows: (1)Analyzing the internal and external efficiencies when putting private management of public high schools system into practice in Taipei County. (2) Evaluating the feasibility of putting private management of public schools into practice. (3) Evaluating the available models of private management of public high schools in Taipei County. (4)Constructing the strategies of putting private management of public high schools in Taipei County. (5)Inspecting the motors of private associations getting themselves into private management of public high schools in Taipei County.(6)analyzing the feasible regions of Taipei County when putting private management of public high schools system into practice. The government should positively guides private resources into the public affairs, hoping that the civil management concept, business administration conduct, and bankroll can positively affect the public school administrative structure and help the school achieve the best accountability.
The research, by adopting methods of documentary analysis, and Fuzzy Delphi, probes into the four dimensions of theory, models, policy, and implementation of private management of public schools. The main conclusions are as follows:
1.The advantages of putting private management of public high schools system into practice were to combine private organizations to decrease government’s financial burden, as well as increasing diverse management space and providing parents various opportunities of educational choices.
2.“Charter school model” and “contract management model” are of the highest feasibility in terms of the implementation of private management of public school in elementary school level in Taipei County.
3.Priority over private management of public school option is new established schools.
4.Private management of public elementary school in Taipei County should possess decision-making power in some aspects including budget source, financial regulation, curriculum and teaching, personnel system .
5.The Taipei county government should accelerate to enact special laws about private management of public school.
6.the Taipei County government should establish relevant systems of control, management, guidance and evaluation. Evaluation system should include Self-Evaluation and Administration- Evaluation, and open the results to the public.
7.The Sinjhuang City of Taipei County has the best potential strengths of putting private management of public high schools system into practice
參考文獻 一、中文部份
王俊民(1997)。臺北市中小學教育民營化之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
王鳳鶯(2004)。國立高級職業學校公辦民營可行策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。
左逢源(2002)。臺南市國民中小學教育公辦民營之研究。臺南師範學院教師在職進修學校行政碩士學位班碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
吳政達(2004)。教育政策分析-概念、方法與運用。臺北:高等教育文化事業有限公司。
吳清山(1995)。美國學校經營型態的新實驗:談公設民營的執行方式。比較教育通訊,36,23-27。
吳清山(1999)。臺北市國民中小學實施公辦民營之可行性分析。教育政策論壇,2(1),157-179。
吳清山、林天佑(2005)。教育選擇權。2008年2月5日,取自http://www.nioerar.edu.tw/basis3/16/gj19.htm
吳開俊(2004)。關於公立學校轉制的觀察與思考。2008年1月3日,取自http://www.cnki.net/index.htm
吳碧華(2005)。教育行政事務委外辦理項目與可行性之研究─以各縣市政府教育局為例。國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。
李希揚(1999)。我國教育事業民營化之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
李柏佳(1999)。家長對學校教育的另類選擇—談臺北市立中小學的委託民營。師說,145,28-34。
周志宏(1996)。從法律觀點看國民教育公辦民營的可行性。臺北:教育部國教司。
林玉芬(2001)。臺灣省公立高中公辦民營理論分析暨可行策略之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
林俊光(1998)。建構結合層級分析法與德菲法之群體決策支援環境。國立成功大學工業管理科學學系碩士論文,未出版,臺南縣。
洪榮進(2002)。臺南縣市國小教育人員對學校公辦民營意見調查研究。國立臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。
徐志誠(2000)。臺灣中部地區國民小學教師對服務學校公辦民營模式態度之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
秦夢群、曹俊德(2001)。我國義務教育公辦民營制度之可行性研究。教育與心理研究,24,19-48。
秦夢群(2004)。教育行政-實務部分。台北:五南。
馬信行(1997)。國民教育公辦民營的可行性之探討。研考報導,38,44-58。
馬信行、于倬民、歐進士、周志宏、戴玉綺和林珈夙(1996)。國民教育公辦民營之可行性研究。臺北:教育部國民教育司。
張明輝(1997)。美國衛星學校計畫。中等教育,48,11-20。
張東亮(2003)。發展國有民辦高中教育的探討。2008年1月3日,取自http://www.cnki.net/index.htm
張清溪(1998)。學校公辦民營的經濟分析。臺北:臺北市政府教育局。
張德銳(1998)。教育選擇權與教育機會均等的影響。教育資料與研究,21,1-7。
張巍(2004)。轉制學校的特徵及改過建議。2008年1月3日,取自http://www.cnki.net/index.htm
教育部中部辦公室(2003)。國立高級中等學校推動民間參與學校運動設施興建營運研討會研習手冊,7-11。臺北:國立三重高中。
曹俊德(1998)。中小學教育公辦民營可行性之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
陳中原(2004,11月5日)。教育券:好主意?壞主意?中國教育報,6版。
陳志峰(2004)。嘉義縣國民中小學教育人員對於實施公辦民營學校可行模式分析之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。
陳英豪(1997)。鼓勵民間參與投資經營教育事業。研考報導,38,28-43。
陳麗美(2004)。臺中市國民中小學教育公辦民營可行性之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。
陳麗嬌(2003)。臺北縣國民小學實施公辦民營可行模式及其運作之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
曾俊凱(2006)。彩虹般的教育潮流─我國另類學校現況與省思。研習資訊,23(3),45-53。
湯家偉(2006)。臺灣地區大學排名指標建構之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。
黃政傑(1998)。國立科學工業園區實驗高級中學長程發展規劃之研究。國立臺灣師大教育研究中心專題研究報告。臺北:未出版。
楊振升(1999)。教育基本法對教育革新之啟示。教育政策論壇,3(1),54-69。
鄒東升(2006)。當代西方政府改革運動講座綜述。2008年2月6日,取自http://kyw.swupl.edu.cn/show.aspx?id=744&cid=27
蓋浙生(1998)。公辦民營、公校私營:範例篇─看國外倡導的經營理念。師說,119,15-17。
蓋浙生(2002)。教育經營與管理。臺北:師大書苑。
蕭綺蓉(2003)。教育民營化發展趨勢及其在我國中小學實施之可行性研究。私立淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北縣。
賴志峰(2005)。臺灣地區中小學公辦民營之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。

二、西文部份
Boyd, W. L. (2007). The Politics of Privatization in American Education. Education Policy, 7-13.
Bulkley, K. E. (2007). Bringing the Private Into the Public-Changing the Rules of the Game and New Regime Politics in Philadelphia Public Education. Education Policy, 155-181.
Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L.(1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods and application. New York:Springer-Verlag.
Christman, J. B., Gold, E., & Herold, B. (2006). Privatization “Philly Style”-What Can Be Learned from Philadelphia’s Diverse Provider Model of School Management? Retrieved Dec, 15, 2007, from:http://www.researchforaction.org
Digger, R.J., Moffett, R., & Struyk, L.(1997). Privatization of Municipal Services in America’s Largest Cities. Public Administration Review, 1(57), 21-26.
Dowding, K. (2001). Explaining Urban Regimes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 7-19.
Farah I., & Rizvi S. (2007). Public-Private Partnerships: Implications for Primary Schooling in Pakistan. Social Policy and Administration, 41, 339-354.
Fitz, J., & Beers, B. (2001). Education Management Organizations and the privatization of public education: A cross national comparison of the USA and the UK. Seattle. WA: American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Seavice No. ED452609)
Fitz, J., & Hafid, T. (2007). Perspectives on the Privatization of Public Schooling in England and Wales. Education Policy, 273-295.
Privatization org (n.d.). Privatization Trends and Statistics. Retrieved Dec, 23,2007, from http://www.privatization.org/database/trendsandstatistics.html
Harry, A. P.(2006). Public-Private Partnerships: Contracting Education in Latin America. Retrieved April, 5, 2008, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources.
Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hentschke, G. C.,& Wohlstetter, P.(2007). K-12Education in a Broader Privatization Context. Education Policy, 297-307.
Hillgate Group (1987). The Reform of British Education. London: Claridge Press.
Hood, C.(1995). Accounting, organizations and Society. The New Public Management, 20, 93-109.
Lip, D., & Feinberg, E. (2006). School Choice: 2006 Program Report. Retrieved Feb, 5, 2008 from: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/bg1970.cfm
Maile, S. (2004). School choice in South Africa. Education and Urban Society, 37(1), 94-116.
Nesta, D. (2004). Education and Public Choice: A Critical Account of the Ivisible Hand in Education. Retrieved Feb, 6, 2008 from: http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/C8029.aspx
Pack, J. R. (1987). Privatizationof Public-Sector Services in Theory and Practice.Journal of PolicyAnalysis and Management, 6(4), 523-540.
Paul, E. Peterson(2004). The Theory and Practice of School Choice. Retrieved Feb, 5, 2008 from: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/schoolchoice/peterson.html
Pearson, J. (1993). Myths of educational choice. London: Praeger.
Rhim, L. M. (2007). The politics of Privatization Practice- An Analysis of State-Initiated Privatization via School Restructuring Statutes in Two Districts. Education Policy, 245-269.
Savas, E. S. (1982). Privatizing the public sector: How to shrink government. New York: Chatham House Publishers.
Savas, E. S. (1992). Privatization ,In Mary Hawkesworth and Maurie Kogan eds., Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, Vol.2, New York:Pouledge.
Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing Schools: Consumer hoice and the Quality of American Schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schneider, M., Teske. P., Marshall, M., & Roch. C. (1998). Shopping for schools: Inthe land of the blind, the one-eyed parent may be enough. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 76-93.
Scott, F. A. (2004). Charter Schools, Parents, and Public Schools in Minnesota. Retrieved Dec, 22, 2007 from:www.cura.umn.edu/reporter/04-Wint/Abernathy.pdf.
Smith, F. L. (1994). The outside option. The American schlle board Journal, 181(4), 40-42.
Stone, C. N.(1989). Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Tolofari, S.(2005). New Public Management and Education. Policy Future in Education, 3, 75-89.
Zumpano, L. V. (2003). The Privatization of Real Estate Related Public Goods and Services in the US. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1, 102-113.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
94152002
96
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094152002
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 吳政達zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wu, Cheng Taen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 鍾欣儒zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Chung, Hsin Juen_US
dc.creator (作者) 鍾欣儒zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Chung, Hsin Juen_US
dc.date (日期) 2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 15:02:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 15:02:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 15:02:16 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0094152002en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32990-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 教育研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 94152002zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 本研究主要目的在於臺北縣升格為準直轄市的背景下探討:(1) 分析臺北縣高中職實施公辦民營之內部、外部效益;(2)評估臺北縣公立高中職公辦民營之可行性;(3) 評估臺北縣公立高中職公辦民營之可行模式;(4) 建構臺北縣公立高中職公辦民營的推動策略;(5)探討民間參與學校公辦民營的動機;(6)分析臺北縣推動公立高中職公辦民營可行區域。希望政府藉由積極結合民間資源共同辦理公共事務,以公辦民營的手段,將民間的管理專業觀念、做法及資金,正面影響學校行政結構、學校經營模式,達成最佳的學校經營成效。
本研究法採文獻分析法、模糊德菲術,針對學校公辦民營的理論、模式、政策與實施四種向度進行探究。研究結果歸納如下:
1.臺北縣實施公立高中職公辦民營之效益為藉由鼓勵民間共同參與辦學,降低財政負擔,以及增加學校多角化經營空間,提供家長多樣化的教育選擇機會。
2.經營型態以特許學校、契約政體模式最為可行。
3.臺北縣於高中職實施的選擇上,以職業學校為優先。
4.臺北縣公辦民營學校之經費來源、財務審計規範、課程與教學、人事運作等應該擁有自主權。
5.臺北縣行政機關應加速研擬公立高中職公辦民營專屬法規。
6.臺北縣政府應建立相關的監督及輔導評鑑的制度,評鑑部分需含自我評鑑及行政機關評鑑,並將評鑑結果公佈。
7.臺北縣新莊市擁有推動公立高中職教育公辦民營的先行試辦優勢。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) On the background of the Taipei County elevating status to “Quasi-Direct-controlled municipality”, the purposes of the research are as follows: (1)Analyzing the internal and external efficiencies when putting private management of public high schools system into practice in Taipei County. (2) Evaluating the feasibility of putting private management of public schools into practice. (3) Evaluating the available models of private management of public high schools in Taipei County. (4)Constructing the strategies of putting private management of public high schools in Taipei County. (5)Inspecting the motors of private associations getting themselves into private management of public high schools in Taipei County.(6)analyzing the feasible regions of Taipei County when putting private management of public high schools system into practice. The government should positively guides private resources into the public affairs, hoping that the civil management concept, business administration conduct, and bankroll can positively affect the public school administrative structure and help the school achieve the best accountability.
The research, by adopting methods of documentary analysis, and Fuzzy Delphi, probes into the four dimensions of theory, models, policy, and implementation of private management of public schools. The main conclusions are as follows:
1.The advantages of putting private management of public high schools system into practice were to combine private organizations to decrease government’s financial burden, as well as increasing diverse management space and providing parents various opportunities of educational choices.
2.“Charter school model” and “contract management model” are of the highest feasibility in terms of the implementation of private management of public school in elementary school level in Taipei County.
3.Priority over private management of public school option is new established schools.
4.Private management of public elementary school in Taipei County should possess decision-making power in some aspects including budget source, financial regulation, curriculum and teaching, personnel system .
5.The Taipei county government should accelerate to enact special laws about private management of public school.
6.the Taipei County government should establish relevant systems of control, management, guidance and evaluation. Evaluation system should include Self-Evaluation and Administration- Evaluation, and open the results to the public.
7.The Sinjhuang City of Taipei County has the best potential strengths of putting private management of public high schools system into practice
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景、動機與目的
第二節 研究待答問題
第三節 名詞釋義
第四節 研究範圍與限制
第二章 文獻探討
第一節 教育事務公辦民營理論及模式
第二節 國外教育公辦民營化之發展趨勢及實例
第三節 臺灣地區教育事務公辦民營背景及演進
第三章 研究方法
第一節 研究方法
第二節 研究流程
第三節 研究對象
第四節 研究工具
第五節 資料處理
第四章 研究結果與討論
第一節 臺北縣公立高級中等學校公辦民營經營型態分析
第二節 臺北縣公立高級中等學校公辦民營策略分析
第三節 臺北縣高中職公辦民營可行區域分析
第五章 結論與建議
第一節 結論
第二節 建議
參考書目
附錄一 專家問卷
附錄二 正式問卷
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 44092 bytes-
dc.format.extent 77875 bytes-
dc.format.extent 94923 bytes-
dc.format.extent 83917 bytes-
dc.format.extent 214623 bytes-
dc.format.extent 505438 bytes-
dc.format.extent 262176 bytes-
dc.format.extent 363047 bytes-
dc.format.extent 170099 bytes-
dc.format.extent 205027 bytes-
dc.format.extent 178982 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094152002en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 學校公辦民營zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 模糊德菲術zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 特許學校模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 契約政體模式zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) private management of public schoolen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Fuzzy Delphi methoden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Charter school modelen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Contract management modelen_US
dc.title (題名) 臺北縣公立高級中等學校公辦民營經營型態評估研究zh_TW
dc.title (題名) Evaluation on the Models of Private Management of Public High Schools in Taipei Countyen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王俊民(1997)。臺北市中小學教育民營化之研究。國立政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王鳳鶯(2004)。國立高級職業學校公辦民營可行策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文,未出版,彰化縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 左逢源(2002)。臺南市國民中小學教育公辦民營之研究。臺南師範學院教師在職進修學校行政碩士學位班碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳政達(2004)。教育政策分析-概念、方法與運用。臺北:高等教育文化事業有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山(1995)。美國學校經營型態的新實驗:談公設民營的執行方式。比較教育通訊,36,23-27。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山(1999)。臺北市國民中小學實施公辦民營之可行性分析。教育政策論壇,2(1),157-179。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳清山、林天佑(2005)。教育選擇權。2008年2月5日,取自http://www.nioerar.edu.tw/basis3/16/gj19.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳開俊(2004)。關於公立學校轉制的觀察與思考。2008年1月3日,取自http://www.cnki.net/index.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳碧華(2005)。教育行政事務委外辦理項目與可行性之研究─以各縣市政府教育局為例。國立屏東師範學院教育行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,屏東縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李希揚(1999)。我國教育事業民營化之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李柏佳(1999)。家長對學校教育的另類選擇—談臺北市立中小學的委託民營。師說,145,28-34。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周志宏(1996)。從法律觀點看國民教育公辦民營的可行性。臺北:教育部國教司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林玉芬(2001)。臺灣省公立高中公辦民營理論分析暨可行策略之研究。國立政治大學教育學系博士論文,未出版,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林俊光(1998)。建構結合層級分析法與德菲法之群體決策支援環境。國立成功大學工業管理科學學系碩士論文,未出版,臺南縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪榮進(2002)。臺南縣市國小教育人員對學校公辦民營意見調查研究。國立臺南師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺南市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐志誠(2000)。臺灣中部地區國民小學教師對服務學校公辦民營模式態度之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦夢群、曹俊德(2001)。我國義務教育公辦民營制度之可行性研究。教育與心理研究,24,19-48。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦夢群(2004)。教育行政-實務部分。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬信行(1997)。國民教育公辦民營的可行性之探討。研考報導,38,44-58。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馬信行、于倬民、歐進士、周志宏、戴玉綺和林珈夙(1996)。國民教育公辦民營之可行性研究。臺北:教育部國民教育司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張明輝(1997)。美國衛星學校計畫。中等教育,48,11-20。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張東亮(2003)。發展國有民辦高中教育的探討。2008年1月3日,取自http://www.cnki.net/index.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張清溪(1998)。學校公辦民營的經濟分析。臺北:臺北市政府教育局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張德銳(1998)。教育選擇權與教育機會均等的影響。教育資料與研究,21,1-7。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張巍(2004)。轉制學校的特徵及改過建議。2008年1月3日,取自http://www.cnki.net/index.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 教育部中部辦公室(2003)。國立高級中等學校推動民間參與學校運動設施興建營運研討會研習手冊,7-11。臺北:國立三重高中。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曹俊德(1998)。中小學教育公辦民營可行性之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳中原(2004,11月5日)。教育券:好主意?壞主意?中國教育報,6版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳志峰(2004)。嘉義縣國民中小學教育人員對於實施公辦民營學校可行模式分析之研究。國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所未出版碩士論文,未出版,嘉義縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳英豪(1997)。鼓勵民間參與投資經營教育事業。研考報導,38,28-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳麗美(2004)。臺中市國民中小學教育公辦民營可行性之研究。臺中師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳麗嬌(2003)。臺北縣國民小學實施公辦民營可行模式及其運作之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曾俊凱(2006)。彩虹般的教育潮流─我國另類學校現況與省思。研習資訊,23(3),45-53。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯家偉(2006)。臺灣地區大學排名指標建構之研究。國立政治大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃政傑(1998)。國立科學工業園區實驗高級中學長程發展規劃之研究。國立臺灣師大教育研究中心專題研究報告。臺北:未出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊振升(1999)。教育基本法對教育革新之啟示。教育政策論壇,3(1),54-69。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄒東升(2006)。當代西方政府改革運動講座綜述。2008年2月6日,取自http://kyw.swupl.edu.cn/show.aspx?id=744&cid=27zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蓋浙生(1998)。公辦民營、公校私營:範例篇─看國外倡導的經營理念。師說,119,15-17。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蓋浙生(2002)。教育經營與管理。臺北:師大書苑。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蕭綺蓉(2003)。教育民營化發展趨勢及其在我國中小學實施之可行性研究。私立淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺北縣。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賴志峰(2005)。臺灣地區中小學公辦民營之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、西文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Boyd, W. L. (2007). The Politics of Privatization in American Education. Education Policy, 7-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bulkley, K. E. (2007). Bringing the Private Into the Public-Changing the Rules of the Game and New Regime Politics in Philadelphia Public Education. Education Policy, 155-181.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L.(1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods and application. New York:Springer-Verlag.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Christman, J. B., Gold, E., & Herold, B. (2006). Privatization “Philly Style”-What Can Be Learned from Philadelphia’s Diverse Provider Model of School Management? Retrieved Dec, 15, 2007, from:http://www.researchforaction.orgzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Digger, R.J., Moffett, R., & Struyk, L.(1997). Privatization of Municipal Services in America’s Largest Cities. Public Administration Review, 1(57), 21-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dowding, K. (2001). Explaining Urban Regimes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(1), 7-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Farah I., & Rizvi S. (2007). Public-Private Partnerships: Implications for Primary Schooling in Pakistan. Social Policy and Administration, 41, 339-354.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fitz, J., & Beers, B. (2001). Education Management Organizations and the privatization of public education: A cross national comparison of the USA and the UK. Seattle. WA: American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Seavice No. ED452609)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fitz, J., & Hafid, T. (2007). Perspectives on the Privatization of Public Schooling in England and Wales. Education Policy, 273-295.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Privatization org (n.d.). Privatization Trends and Statistics. Retrieved Dec, 23,2007, from http://www.privatization.org/database/trendsandstatistics.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harry, A. P.(2006). Public-Private Partnerships: Contracting Education in Latin America. Retrieved April, 5, 2008, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EDUCATION/Resources.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Henig, J. R. (1994). Rethinking school choice: Limits of the market metaphor. Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hentschke, G. C.,& Wohlstetter, P.(2007). K-12Education in a Broader Privatization Context. Education Policy, 297-307.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hillgate Group (1987). The Reform of British Education. London: Claridge Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hood, C.(1995). Accounting, organizations and Society. The New Public Management, 20, 93-109.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lip, D., & Feinberg, E. (2006). School Choice: 2006 Program Report. Retrieved Feb, 5, 2008 from: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/bg1970.cfmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maile, S. (2004). School choice in South Africa. Education and Urban Society, 37(1), 94-116.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nesta, D. (2004). Education and Public Choice: A Critical Account of the Ivisible Hand in Education. Retrieved Feb, 6, 2008 from: http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/C8029.aspxzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pack, J. R. (1987). Privatizationof Public-Sector Services in Theory and Practice.Journal of PolicyAnalysis and Management, 6(4), 523-540.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Paul, E. Peterson(2004). The Theory and Practice of School Choice. Retrieved Feb, 5, 2008 from: http://www.vanderbilt.edu/schoolchoice/peterson.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pearson, J. (1993). Myths of educational choice. London: Praeger.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rhim, L. M. (2007). The politics of Privatization Practice- An Analysis of State-Initiated Privatization via School Restructuring Statutes in Two Districts. Education Policy, 245-269.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Savas, E. S. (1982). Privatizing the public sector: How to shrink government. New York: Chatham House Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Savas, E. S. (1992). Privatization ,In Mary Hawkesworth and Maurie Kogan eds., Encyclopedia of Government and Politics, Vol.2, New York:Pouledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schneider, M., Teske, P., & Marschall, M. (2000). Choosing Schools: Consumer hoice and the Quality of American Schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schneider, M., Teske. P., Marshall, M., & Roch. C. (1998). Shopping for schools: Inthe land of the blind, the one-eyed parent may be enough. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 76-93.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scott, F. A. (2004). Charter Schools, Parents, and Public Schools in Minnesota. Retrieved Dec, 22, 2007 from:www.cura.umn.edu/reporter/04-Wint/Abernathy.pdf.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, F. L. (1994). The outside option. The American schlle board Journal, 181(4), 40-42.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stone, C. N.(1989). Regime Politics: Governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tolofari, S.(2005). New Public Management and Education. Policy Future in Education, 3, 75-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zumpano, L. V. (2003). The Privatization of Real Estate Related Public Goods and Services in the US. Nordic Journal of Surveying and Real Estate Research, 1, 102-113.zh_TW