學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 台 灣 數 位 無 線 電 視 共 同 傳 輸 公 司 的 建構內涵與發展類型:一個新制度論觀點的探究
作者 李洋
Lee,Yang
貢獻者 曾國峰<br>程宗明
<br>
李洋
Lee,Yang
關鍵詞 新制度論
數位無線電視
共同傳輸公司
共同營運公司
公共廣電媒體
New Institutionalism
Digital terrestrial television
Transmission Company
public service broadcasting.
日期 2003
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 15:41:46 (UTC+8)
摘要 做為新制度流派之一的歷史制度論認為:一政策的成形,乃為情境中各要角(actor)勢力的競逐過程。研究者則在探討,做為競逐場域的共同傳輸公司,各要角勢力的競逐態勢,又將對未來台灣數位無線電視的樣貌,產生什麼樣的影響?

本研究提出,要探討台灣共同傳輸公司的建構意涵,需回到歐洲公共廣電媒體數位化的發展脈絡進行考察,並再回到台灣的情境脈絡中,定義共同傳輸公司於台灣的建置意涵為何。

研究者從八國(英國、瑞典、西班牙、法國、荷蘭、芬蘭、愛爾蘭、義大利)歐洲公共廣電媒體數位化的過程,歸納出三套共同傳輸公司的類型,包括:「既有獨佔型」、「準公共事業型」,及「市場競爭型」。本研究除分析這三種傳輸公司類型移植台灣的意義為何,並進一步評估其移植的可行性。另外,本研究亦針對共同傳輸公司議題,對未來「NCC作用法」的修法方向提出建議。
The goal of Historical Institutionalism is one of the sects of New Institutionalism. It focus on finding, measuring and tracing patterns and sequences of social, political, economic behavior and change across time and space. Historical Institutionalism argue that the actors involved in the social context are the important variables for understanding political outcomes.

This study try to find out the process of transmission company construction in Taiwan based on the viewpoint of historical institutionalism. Taiwan government plans to switch of the analog terrestrial television before 2010. Government try to stop the vertical integration of terrestrial television. Then also plan to construct the transmission company.

This study compares with the process of digitalization of European public service broadcasting, and typologies 3 forms of transmission company, including ‘Existing-monopoly Type’, ‘Quasi-public service Type’ and ‘Market-competition Type’. After that, continuing thinking about the adaptability of three types in Taiwan. And also interprets the connotation of development of transmission company in Taiwan.
參考文獻 〈中文部分〉
中國時報社論(2001):〈評議「黨政軍退出三台」與「公共化」爭
議〉,《中國時報》,2版。
行政院新聞局(2002):挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫(2002-2007)。台
北,行政院。
戎撫天(2004):〈無線數位電視發展五大困境〉,《經濟日報》,2
版。
江煒琪(2004a):〈數位電視是無線台的機翻身機會〉,《財訊》,117
期,頁154-158。
江煒琦(2004b):〈數位電視發展出線重大隱憂 無線台合作仍是紙上談
兵〉,《財訊》,117期,頁156-157。
余俊穎(2003):《以價值網觀點探討數位電視產業之競爭優勢—無線、
有線、電信網路及衛星四類平台之比較》。私立元智大學資訊傳播研究
所碩士論文。
吳光中(2004/08/28):〈4無線台將集資10億成立共同營運公司〉,《民
生報》,B1版。
李秀珠、趙子宏(2001):《電視數位化後頻道之使用及管理研究》。
行政院新聞局委託研究。
李順德(2004/06/09):〈94年度編20億 收購華視台視股權〉,《聯合
報》,A11版。
呂雪彗(2004/11/09):〈共同傳輸平台 將與五業者共構〉,《工商時
報》,2版。
吳庚(2000):《行政法之理論與實用》。台北:三民。
許仟(1991):《歐洲文化與歐洲聯盟文化政策》。台北:樂學書局。
莊文忠(2003):〈制度的研究:「新制度論」觀點的比較與「後現代制
度論」的發展〉,《理論與政策》,第十六卷第四期,頁15-44,
林瑩秋(2004):〈林家龍「漲停打開」公共集團構想是個深水炸彈〉,《財訊》,117期,頁124-125。
林淑玲(2001/12/24):〈公共化理想建國 路途遙遠〉,《中國時
報》,5版。
林麗雲(2001):〈公共化不是「政府化」,更不應是「綠化」〉,收錄
於正智大學傳播學院媒體素養研究室(2002)《電視改革 針鋒相
對?》。台北:政大傳研中心。
洪儀芳(2002):《台灣與日本數位電視的發展與困境》。國立台灣大學
新聞研究所碩士論文。
馮建三(1999):〈國家主權與廣電管制:一個動態觀點從歐洲聯盟「電
視無疆界」十年史談起〉,《傳播文化》,第八期,頁 317-338。
馮昭台(2004/06/18):〈台視華視公共化方案本週送政務委員審議〉,《中央社》。
陳民峰(2003/05/06):〈數位電視 96年底開播〉,《民生報》,B1版。
陳炳宏(2002):〈當公共化議題被貼上標籤後〉,《自由時報》,15
版。
徐秋華(2000):《英國數位電視發展現況》,台北:公共電視研發部。
郭承天(2000):〈新制度論與政治經濟學〉,收錄於何思因、吳玉山主
編,《邁入廿一世紀的政治學》,台北:中國政治學會,頁171-201。
黃兆璽(2004-11-09):〈新聞局回收類比頻道 TV內建數位接收功能 2010
年 電視全面數位化〉,《星報》,B1版。
黃其福(2001):〈黨政軍退出媒體 在野從預算動刀〉,《聯合晚
報》,2版。
黃國師(2004):〈製播分離政策對我國無線電視產業營運的影響〉,發
表於《數位產業的發展趨勢與經營管理 台灣數位廣播電視傳播論
壇》。 台北:台灣藝術大學。
管中祥(2004):〈公共廣電集團不是媒體改造萬靈丹〉,《目擊者》,
41期。
程宗明(2002):〈電視政策對制度形塑的回顧與前瞻:四十年的荒原,
曠野中的呼聲〉,發表於《台灣電視四十年回顧與前瞻研究》。台北:
國立政治大學傳播學院。
-(2003):《判台灣的電視政策,2000-2002:無線電視台公共化與數
位化之思辯》。國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。
-(2004):〈突破數位電視發展瓶頸之呼籲〉,《數位視訊月刊》,七
月號。
-(2005):〈數位廣播時代製播分離的第一步:傳輸網路之公共化〉,《公視研究季刊》,創刊號。
蔡慧貞、劉宜(2005/8/25):〈2年92億建構公視集團〉,《中國時
報》,A2版。
鄭明樁(1992):〈高解析電視的政經難題〉收錄於Ithiel de Sola
Pool(1992)原著,卜大中(1992)等譯:《第八類接觸》。台北:時
報。
鄭陸霖(2000)。〈是誰惹毛沈睡中的貓?台灣有線電視場域中的權利競
爭〉,《台灣產業研究研究》,3: 225-261。
聯合晚報社論(2001):〈先創造公共化共識〉,《聯合報》,2版。
詹婷怡(1999):〈電信普及服務之制度與內涵〉,《通訊雜誌》,7月
號,頁22-25。
羅莊鵬(2004):〈無線電頻譜的配用模式--政府管制、市場機制與共用
模式之探討〉。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所論文。
鍾起惠(2003):《節目品質與優質電視- 兼論當前台灣電視節目產製的
困境與出路》。台北:財團法人廣播電視事業發展基金。
Burstein & Kline(1995)原著, 查修傑(1997)譯:《決戰資訊高速公路
決戰資訊高速公路-第二波資訊革命的契機與反思》。台北:遠流。
Downey, J. and McGuigan (1999)原著,江淑玲譯(2003):《科技新城
鎮》。台北:韋伯文化。
Lyon, D.等人(1988)原著,馮建三等譯(1988):《未來的省思》。板
橋:駱駝出版社。
May, C.(2004).原著,葉欣怡譯(2004):《質疑資訊社會》。台北:韋
伯文化。
Pool(1992)原著,卜大中等(1992)譯:《第八類接觸》。台北:時報。
Webster, F.(1995)原著,馮建三譯(1999):《資訊社會理論》。台
北:遠流。
Williams(1990)原著,馮建三(2002)譯:《電視:科技與文化型式》。
台北:遠流。
〈英文部分〉
Alberico, G.(2003). The launch of DTT in Italy. RAI
Bangemann Report (1995). European information society: Recommendations to the European Council. Brussels: European
Commission
Bell, D.(1973). The coming of the post-industrial society: A
venture in social forecasting. NY: Basic.
Bourreau, M. (2004). Digital terrestrial television in France:
An attempt to enhance competition in an oligopolistic market.
In Brown, A. Picard, R. G. (Ed.) (2004). Digital Terrestrial
Television in Europe. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc.
Bruin, D. Ronald and Smits, J. (1999). Digital Video
Broadcasting: Technology, Standards, and Regulations. London:
Artech House.
CMT(Telecommunications Market Commission), (2002). Annual
report, Spain.
Collins R.(1998). Back to the future--Digital television and
convergence in the United Kingdom. Telecommunications Policy,
22(4-5): 383-396.
-(1999). European Union media and communication policies in
Jane Stokes and Anna Reading, The media in Britain: Current
debates and developments Houndsmills: Palgrave.
-.(2002). Digital television in the United Kingdom.
Javnost/The Public, 9:4, 5-18.
The Council of European Union (2002). Group of specialists on
the democratic and social implications of digital
broadcasting. Brussels, Belgium.
- (2002). Report on media diversity in Europe. Brussels: The
Council of Europe.
deLeon, P.(1992). The Democratization of the Policy Science.
Public Administration Review. 52(2):125-129.
DLM (2000). Position of the DLM on the EU Commission`s proposal
for a new regulatory framework for electronic communications
networks and services. Germany.
EBU(European Broadcasting Union)(2000). EBU comments on the EU
commission’s proposals for directives regarding the review of
the regulation framework for communications. EBU, Switzerland.
EPRA(European Platform of Regulatory Authorities)(2004).
Working on digital terrestrial television in EPRA countries.
Germany: Secretary of the EPRA.
European Commission (1993). White Paper on Growth,
Competitiveness and Employment: The challenge and ways forward
in 21st Century. Brussels: European Commission
-(1997). Green paper on the convergence of the
telecommunications , media and information technology sectors,
and the implications for regulation: Towards an information
society. Brussels, Belgium.
- (1998). Green paper on radio spectrum policy. Brussels,
Belgium.
- (1999a). Next Steps in Radio Spectrum Policy: Results of the
Public Consultation on the Green Paper. Brussels, Belgium.
- (1999b). Towards a new framework for Electronic
Communications infrastructure and associated services.
Brussels, Belgium.
European Parliament (1996). Tongue report. Brussels: European
Parliament.
Fischer, F.(1993). Citizen participation and the
democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry
to practical cases. Policy Sciences 26(3): 165-187.
Freshfieds Bruckhaus Deringer (2001). Significant market power:
It’s impact on telecommunication operator in the EU.
Freshfieds.com.
Galperin, H.(2004). Beyond interests, ideas, and technology: An
Institutional approach to communication and information
policy. The Information Society, 20: 159-168.
-(2004b). New TV, Old Politics: The Transition to Digital TV
in the United States and Britain. Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, J. (1981). Structural transformation of the public
sphere. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
Hall, P. A. and C. R. Taller, (1996). Political science and the
three new institutionalism. Political Studies 45:936-957
Hundt, E. (2000). You Say You Want a Revolution: A story of
information age politics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University
Press.
IDATE (2000). Development of Digital TV in Europe- Sweden.
【Online】Available: http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/infosoc/
telecompolicy
King, C. , Feltey, K. and Susel, B.(1998). The question of
participation: Toward authentic public participation in public
administration. Public Administration Review 58(4),317-326.
Koelble, A.(1995). The new institutionalism in political
science and sociology, Comparative Politics 27(2):231-243.
Kubicek, H. , Dutton, W. and Williams, R. (Ed.)(1997). The
social shaping of information superhighway: European and
American roads to the information society. Frankfurt
[Germany] ; New York : Campus Verlag ; New York : St. Martin`s
Press
Levy, D (1999). Europe’s Digital Revolution—Broadcasting
regulation, the EU and the nation state. London: Routledge
March, G. and Olsen P. (1989). Recovering institutionalism,
Polity 28(1):107-115.
Marsden, C. and Verhulst, S. (1999). Convergence in European
Digital TV Regulation. Blackstone Press.
Mitomo, H. and Ueda, Y. (2003). Vertical separation between
program production and transmission: Network sharing in the
Japanese broadcasting industry. Communications & Strategies, 52
(4): 239-255.
Murphy, K. (2004). Ireland, RT□ and the digital transition:
Policy navigation in a small European state. Trends in
Communication 12(4), 193-210.
NRAs(European Regulators of Group of National Regulatory
Authorities)(2004). ERG Common Position on the approach to
Appropriate remedies in the new regulatory framework.
Brussels, Belgium.
Neuman, W. Russell (1999). Broadcasting and bandwidth. In
Gerbarg, Darcy (ed.). The economics, technology and content of
digital TV. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nordenstreng, K, (1997).The citizen moves from the audience to
the arena. Nordicom Review(2): 13-20
Noveck, B. (1999). Analogue thinking; Digital television:
Recrafting content regulation. In Marsden, C. and Verhulst, S.
(Ed.)(1999). Convergrnce in European digital TV regulation.
UK:Black Stone Press Limited.
Pontusson, J. (1995). From Comparative Public Policy to
Political Economy: Putting Political Institutions in Their
Places and Taking Interests Seriously, Comparative Political
Studies 28(1): 117-147. Screen Digest, 2000: 105-106
Price, Monroe E. and Marc Raboy (2001). Public service
broadcasting in transition: A documentary reader. Dusseldorf:
European Institute for the Media.
R. Craufurd Smith (2005).〈Public Service Broadcasting in the
European Union: No longer simply a matter of domestic
concern.〉,《傳媒透視》,九月號 頁10-11。香港:香港電台。
Raboy, M. (1997). Cultural sovereignty, public participation,
and democratization of the public sphere: The Canadian debate
on the new information infrastructure. In Kahin, B. and Wilson, E. J. (Ed.)(1997). National information infrastructure
initiatives : vision and policy design. Cambridge, Mass. : MIT
Press.
- (1999). The world situation of public service broadcasting,
In AMIC (Ed.). Public service broadcasting in Asia: Surviving
in the new information age. (pp. 3-24). Singapore: AMIC
Scannell, P (2002). Public service broadcasting: The history of
a concept. In Toby Miller (Ed.). Television: Critical
concepts in media and cultural studies. Volume IV, London:
Routledge, 212-226.
Schierbeck, P. (2001). Regulatory schemes and practices
concerning the licensing of digital broadcasting services -
the Swedish experience.
【Online】available:
http://www.humanrights.coe.int/media/events/2000/digital%
20platforms/ACONF-AD%20(2000)%207%20Rapport%
20SCHIERBECK.doc
Teracom (1998). Annual Repor t 1998. Sweden: Teracom.
- (2001). Annual Repor t 2001. Sweden: Teracom.
- (2003). Annual Repor t 2003. Sweden: Teracom.
- (2004). Annual Repor t 2004. Sweden: Teracom.
Wamsley, G.(1990). Refunding public administration, Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wbeeler, M.( 2004). Supranational regulation: Television and
the European Union. European Journal of Communication, 19(3):
349-369.
Wilson, E. J.(1998). Introductory scenarios for interactive
television. EBU Technical Review ,275. Switzerland: European
Broadcasting Union.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
廣播電視學研究所
92453004
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0924530042
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 曾國峰<br>程宗明zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor <br>en_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李洋zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lee,Yangen_US
dc.creator (作者) 李洋zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lee,Yangen_US
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 15:41:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 15:41:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 15:41:46 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0924530042en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33177-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 廣播電視學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92453004zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 做為新制度流派之一的歷史制度論認為:一政策的成形,乃為情境中各要角(actor)勢力的競逐過程。研究者則在探討,做為競逐場域的共同傳輸公司,各要角勢力的競逐態勢,又將對未來台灣數位無線電視的樣貌,產生什麼樣的影響?

本研究提出,要探討台灣共同傳輸公司的建構意涵,需回到歐洲公共廣電媒體數位化的發展脈絡進行考察,並再回到台灣的情境脈絡中,定義共同傳輸公司於台灣的建置意涵為何。

研究者從八國(英國、瑞典、西班牙、法國、荷蘭、芬蘭、愛爾蘭、義大利)歐洲公共廣電媒體數位化的過程,歸納出三套共同傳輸公司的類型,包括:「既有獨佔型」、「準公共事業型」,及「市場競爭型」。本研究除分析這三種傳輸公司類型移植台灣的意義為何,並進一步評估其移植的可行性。另外,本研究亦針對共同傳輸公司議題,對未來「NCC作用法」的修法方向提出建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) The goal of Historical Institutionalism is one of the sects of New Institutionalism. It focus on finding, measuring and tracing patterns and sequences of social, political, economic behavior and change across time and space. Historical Institutionalism argue that the actors involved in the social context are the important variables for understanding political outcomes.

This study try to find out the process of transmission company construction in Taiwan based on the viewpoint of historical institutionalism. Taiwan government plans to switch of the analog terrestrial television before 2010. Government try to stop the vertical integration of terrestrial television. Then also plan to construct the transmission company.

This study compares with the process of digitalization of European public service broadcasting, and typologies 3 forms of transmission company, including ‘Existing-monopoly Type’, ‘Quasi-public service Type’ and ‘Market-competition Type’. After that, continuing thinking about the adaptability of three types in Taiwan. And also interprets the connotation of development of transmission company in Taiwan.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第壹章 共同傳輸公司議題的崛起............................p. 01
第一節 楔子:要角(actors)..............................p.01
第二節 起源於歐洲的共同傳輸公司........................p.04
第三節 走向數位,歐洲與台灣的對比......................p.08

第貳章 新制度論與傳播科技政策研究...........................p.11
第一節 應用於傳播科技政策分析的新制度論................p.11
第二節 概念化分析指標(一):
歐洲無線廣電頻譜規劃之爭議...............p.15
第三節 概念化分析指標(二):
做為台灣勢力競逐場域的「製播分離」議題...p.23
第四節 外部變數?再探無線電視公共化議題:
2001年-2005年..................p.27
第五節 設立研究問題........................p.31
第六節 研究概念、方法與結構................p.32

第參章 比較歐洲共同傳輸公司的建構內涵.....................p.35
第一節 歐盟傳播政策解析:
無線電頻譜及傳輸基礎建設議題................... p.35
第二節 歐洲數位無線電視政策(一):
數位頻譜規劃與共同傳輸公司發展...................p.42
第三節 歐洲數位無線電視政策(二):
模式歸納與分析...................................p.61
第四節 共同傳輸公司的公共性與頻譜規劃的政治性......p.65

第肆章 耙梳台灣共同傳輸公司議題的發展脈絡.................p.71
第一節 台灣共同傳輸公司發展現況:
硬體建設與政策規範...............................p.72
第二節 政商之爭....................................p.86
第三節 近程台灣數位無線電視政策發展分析............p.94

第伍章 歐洲與台灣傳輸公司的類型建構與分析..............p.101
第一節 勢力競逐與類型建構..........................p.101
第二節 台灣傳輸公司類型建立與分析..................p.105
第三節 結語........................................p.114

參考書目................................................p.120
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 118476 bytes-
dc.format.extent 239254 bytes-
dc.format.extent 347480 bytes-
dc.format.extent 389901 bytes-
dc.format.extent 409061 bytes-
dc.format.extent 278555 bytes-
dc.format.extent 239069 bytes-
dc.format.extent 75150 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0924530042en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新制度論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 數位無線電視zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共同傳輸公司zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 共同營運公司zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公共廣電媒體zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) New Institutionalismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Digital terrestrial televisionen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Transmission Companyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) public service broadcasting.en_US
dc.title (題名) 台 灣 數 位 無 線 電 視 共 同 傳 輸 公 司 的 建構內涵與發展類型:一個新制度論觀點的探究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 〈中文部分〉zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中國時報社論(2001):〈評議「黨政軍退出三台」與「公共化」爭zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 議〉,《中國時報》,2版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院新聞局(2002):挑戰2008:國家發展重點計畫(2002-2007)。台zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 北,行政院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 戎撫天(2004):〈無線數位電視發展五大困境〉,《經濟日報》,2zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江煒琪(2004a):〈數位電視是無線台的機翻身機會〉,《財訊》,117zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 期,頁154-158。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 江煒琦(2004b):〈數位電視發展出線重大隱憂 無線台合作仍是紙上談zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 兵〉,《財訊》,117期,頁156-157。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 余俊穎(2003):《以價值網觀點探討數位電視產業之競爭優勢—無線、zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 有線、電信網路及衛星四類平台之比較》。私立元智大學資訊傳播研究zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳光中(2004/08/28):〈4無線台將集資10億成立共同營運公司〉,《民zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 生報》,B1版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李秀珠、趙子宏(2001):《電視數位化後頻道之使用及管理研究》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 行政院新聞局委託研究。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李順德(2004/06/09):〈94年度編20億 收購華視台視股權〉,《聯合zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 報》,A11版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂雪彗(2004/11/09):〈共同傳輸平台 將與五業者共構〉,《工商時zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 報》,2版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳庚(2000):《行政法之理論與實用》。台北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 許仟(1991):《歐洲文化與歐洲聯盟文化政策》。台北:樂學書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 莊文忠(2003):〈制度的研究:「新制度論」觀點的比較與「後現代制zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 度論」的發展〉,《理論與政策》,第十六卷第四期,頁15-44,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林瑩秋(2004):〈林家龍「漲停打開」公共集團構想是個深水炸彈〉,《財訊》,117期,頁124-125。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林淑玲(2001/12/24):〈公共化理想建國 路途遙遠〉,《中國時zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 報》,5版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林麗雲(2001):〈公共化不是「政府化」,更不應是「綠化」〉,收錄zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 於正智大學傳播學院媒體素養研究室(2002)《電視改革 針鋒相zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 對?》。台北:政大傳研中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 洪儀芳(2002):《台灣與日本數位電視的發展與困境》。國立台灣大學zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馮建三(1999):〈國家主權與廣電管制:一個動態觀點從歐洲聯盟「電zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 視無疆界」十年史談起〉,《傳播文化》,第八期,頁 317-338。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 馮昭台(2004/06/18):〈台視華視公共化方案本週送政務委員審議〉,《中央社》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳民峰(2003/05/06):〈數位電視 96年底開播〉,《民生報》,B1版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳炳宏(2002):〈當公共化議題被貼上標籤後〉,《自由時報》,15zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 徐秋華(2000):《英國數位電視發展現況》,台北:公共電視研發部。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 郭承天(2000):〈新制度論與政治經濟學〉,收錄於何思因、吳玉山主zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 編,《邁入廿一世紀的政治學》,台北:中國政治學會,頁171-201。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃兆璽(2004-11-09):〈新聞局回收類比頻道 TV內建數位接收功能 2010zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 年 電視全面數位化〉,《星報》,B1版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃其福(2001):〈黨政軍退出媒體 在野從預算動刀〉,《聯合晚zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 報》,2版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃國師(2004):〈製播分離政策對我國無線電視產業營運的影響〉,發zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 表於《數位產業的發展趨勢與經營管理 台灣數位廣播電視傳播論zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 壇》。 台北:台灣藝術大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 管中祥(2004):〈公共廣電集團不是媒體改造萬靈丹〉,《目擊者》,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 41期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 程宗明(2002):〈電視政策對制度形塑的回顧與前瞻:四十年的荒原,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 曠野中的呼聲〉,發表於《台灣電視四十年回顧與前瞻研究》。台北:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 國立政治大學傳播學院。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -(2003):《判台灣的電視政策,2000-2002:無線電視台公共化與數zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 位化之思辯》。國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -(2004):〈突破數位電視發展瓶頸之呼籲〉,《數位視訊月刊》,七zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 月號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -(2005):〈數位廣播時代製播分離的第一步:傳輸網路之公共化〉,《公視研究季刊》,創刊號。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡慧貞、劉宜(2005/8/25):〈2年92億建構公視集團〉,《中國時zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 報》,A2版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭明樁(1992):〈高解析電視的政經難題〉收錄於Ithiel de Solazh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pool(1992)原著,卜大中(1992)等譯:《第八類接觸》。台北:時zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 報。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鄭陸霖(2000)。〈是誰惹毛沈睡中的貓?台灣有線電視場域中的權利競zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 爭〉,《台灣產業研究研究》,3: 225-261。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 聯合晚報社論(2001):〈先創造公共化共識〉,《聯合報》,2版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 詹婷怡(1999):〈電信普及服務之制度與內涵〉,《通訊雜誌》,7月zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 號,頁22-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅莊鵬(2004):〈無線電頻譜的配用模式--政府管制、市場機制與共用zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 模式之探討〉。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鍾起惠(2003):《節目品質與優質電視- 兼論當前台灣電視節目產製的zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 困境與出路》。台北:財團法人廣播電視事業發展基金。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burstein & Kline(1995)原著, 查修傑(1997)譯:《決戰資訊高速公路zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 決戰資訊高速公路-第二波資訊革命的契機與反思》。台北:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Downey, J. and McGuigan (1999)原著,江淑玲譯(2003):《科技新城zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鎮》。台北:韋伯文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lyon, D.等人(1988)原著,馮建三等譯(1988):《未來的省思》。板zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 橋:駱駝出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) May, C.(2004).原著,葉欣怡譯(2004):《質疑資訊社會》。台北:韋zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 伯文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pool(1992)原著,卜大中等(1992)譯:《第八類接觸》。台北:時報。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Webster, F.(1995)原著,馮建三譯(1999):《資訊社會理論》。台zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 北:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Williams(1990)原著,馮建三(2002)譯:《電視:科技與文化型式》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 台北:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 〈英文部分〉zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alberico, G.(2003). The launch of DTT in Italy. RAIzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bangemann Report (1995). European information society: Recommendations to the European Council. Brussels: Europeanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Commissionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bell, D.(1973). The coming of the post-industrial society: Azh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) venture in social forecasting. NY: Basic.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bourreau, M. (2004). Digital terrestrial television in France:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) An attempt to enhance competition in an oligopolistic market.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) In Brown, A. Picard, R. G. (Ed.) (2004). Digital Terrestrialzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Television in Europe. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bruin, D. Ronald and Smits, J. (1999). Digital Videozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Broadcasting: Technology, Standards, and Regulations. London:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Artech House.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) CMT(Telecommunications Market Commission), (2002). Annualzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) report, Spain.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Collins R.(1998). Back to the future--Digital television andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) convergence in the United Kingdom. Telecommunications Policy,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 22(4-5): 383-396.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -(1999). European Union media and communication policies inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jane Stokes and Anna Reading, The media in Britain: Currentzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) debates and developments Houndsmills: Palgrave.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -.(2002). Digital television in the United Kingdom.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Javnost/The Public, 9:4, 5-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) The Council of European Union (2002). Group of specialists onzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the democratic and social implications of digitalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) broadcasting. Brussels, Belgium.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - (2002). Report on media diversity in Europe. Brussels: Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Council of Europe.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) deLeon, P.(1992). The Democratization of the Policy Science.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Public Administration Review. 52(2):125-129.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) DLM (2000). Position of the DLM on the EU Commission`s proposalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) for a new regulatory framework for electronic communicationszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) networks and services. Germany.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) EBU(European Broadcasting Union)(2000). EBU comments on the EUzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) commission’s proposals for directives regarding the review ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the regulation framework for communications. EBU, Switzerland.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) EPRA(European Platform of Regulatory Authorities)(2004).zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Working on digital terrestrial television in EPRA countries.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Germany: Secretary of the EPRA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) European Commission (1993). White Paper on Growth,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Competitiveness and Employment: The challenge and ways forwardzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in 21st Century. Brussels: European Commissionzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -(1997). Green paper on the convergence of thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) telecommunications , media and information technology sectors,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and the implications for regulation: Towards an informationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) society. Brussels, Belgium.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - (1998). Green paper on radio spectrum policy. Brussels,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Belgium.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - (1999a). Next Steps in Radio Spectrum Policy: Results of thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Public Consultation on the Green Paper. Brussels, Belgium.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - (1999b). Towards a new framework for Electroniczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Communications infrastructure and associated services.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brussels, Belgium.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) European Parliament (1996). Tongue report. Brussels: Europeanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Parliament.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fischer, F.(1993). Citizen participation and thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiryzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) to practical cases. Policy Sciences 26(3): 165-187.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Freshfieds Bruckhaus Deringer (2001). Significant market power:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) It’s impact on telecommunication operator in the EU.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Freshfieds.com.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Galperin, H.(2004). Beyond interests, ideas, and technology: Anzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Institutional approach to communication and informationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) policy. The Information Society, 20: 159-168.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) -(2004b). New TV, Old Politics: The Transition to Digital TVzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in the United States and Britain. Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Habermas, J. (1981). Structural transformation of the publiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) sphere. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hall, P. A. and C. R. Taller, (1996). Political science and thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) three new institutionalism. Political Studies 45:936-957zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hundt, E. (2000). You Say You Want a Revolution: A story ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) information age politics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale Universityzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) IDATE (2000). Development of Digital TV in Europe- Sweden.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 【Online】Available: http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/infosoc/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) telecompolicyzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) King, C. , Feltey, K. and Susel, B.(1998). The question ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) participation: Toward authentic public participation in publiczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) administration. Public Administration Review 58(4),317-326.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Koelble, A.(1995). The new institutionalism in politicalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) science and sociology, Comparative Politics 27(2):231-243.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kubicek, H. , Dutton, W. and Williams, R. (Ed.)(1997). Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) social shaping of information superhighway: European andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) American roads to the information society. Frankfurtzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) [Germany] ; New York : Campus Verlag ; New York : St. Martin`szh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Presszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levy, D (1999). Europe’s Digital Revolution—Broadcastingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) regulation, the EU and the nation state. London: Routledgezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) March, G. and Olsen P. (1989). Recovering institutionalism,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Polity 28(1):107-115.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Marsden, C. and Verhulst, S. (1999). Convergence in Europeanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Digital TV Regulation. Blackstone Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mitomo, H. and Ueda, Y. (2003). Vertical separation betweenzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) program production and transmission: Network sharing in thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Japanese broadcasting industry. Communications & Strategies, 52zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (4): 239-255.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Murphy, K. (2004). Ireland, RT□ and the digital transition:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Policy navigation in a small European state. Trends inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Communication 12(4), 193-210.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) NRAs(European Regulators of Group of National Regulatoryzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Authorities)(2004). ERG Common Position on the approach tozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Appropriate remedies in the new regulatory framework.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brussels, Belgium.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Neuman, W. Russell (1999). Broadcasting and bandwidth. Inzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gerbarg, Darcy (ed.). The economics, technology and content ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) digital TV. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nordenstreng, K, (1997).The citizen moves from the audience tozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the arena. Nordicom Review(2): 13-20zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Noveck, B. (1999). Analogue thinking; Digital television:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Recrafting content regulation. In Marsden, C. and Verhulst, S.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (Ed.)(1999). Convergrnce in European digital TV regulation.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) UK:Black Stone Press Limited.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pontusson, J. (1995). From Comparative Public Policy tozh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Political Economy: Putting Political Institutions in Theirzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Places and Taking Interests Seriously, Comparative Politicalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Studies 28(1): 117-147. Screen Digest, 2000: 105-106zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Price, Monroe E. and Marc Raboy (2001). Public servicezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) broadcasting in transition: A documentary reader. Dusseldorf:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) European Institute for the Media.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) R. Craufurd Smith (2005).〈Public Service Broadcasting in thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) European Union: No longer simply a matter of domesticzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) concern.〉,《傳媒透視》,九月號 頁10-11。香港:香港電台。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Raboy, M. (1997). Cultural sovereignty, public participation,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) and democratization of the public sphere: The Canadian debatezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) on the new information infrastructure. In Kahin, B. and Wilson, E. J. (Ed.)(1997). National information infrastructurezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) initiatives : vision and policy design. Cambridge, Mass. : MITzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - (1999). The world situation of public service broadcasting,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) In AMIC (Ed.). Public service broadcasting in Asia: Survivingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) in the new information age. (pp. 3-24). Singapore: AMICzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scannell, P (2002). Public service broadcasting: The history ofzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) a concept. In Toby Miller (Ed.). Television: Criticalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) concepts in media and cultural studies. Volume IV, London:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Routledge, 212-226.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schierbeck, P. (2001). Regulatory schemes and practiceszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) concerning the licensing of digital broadcasting services -zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the Swedish experience.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 【Online】available:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.humanrights.coe.int/media/events/2000/digital%zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20platforms/ACONF-AD%20(2000)%207%20Rapport%zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 20SCHIERBECK.doczh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Teracom (1998). Annual Repor t 1998. Sweden: Teracom.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - (2001). Annual Repor t 2001. Sweden: Teracom.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - (2003). Annual Repor t 2003. Sweden: Teracom.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) - (2004). Annual Repor t 2004. Sweden: Teracom.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wamsley, G.(1990). Refunding public administration, Thousandzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oaks, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wbeeler, M.( 2004). Supranational regulation: Television andzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) the European Union. European Journal of Communication, 19(3):zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 349-369.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilson, E. J.(1998). Introductory scenarios for interactivezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) television. EBU Technical Review ,275. Switzerland: Europeanzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Broadcasting Union.zh_TW