1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 傳播學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 新聞訪談提問之立足點研究
作者 俞明瑤
Ming Yao Yu
貢獻者 臧國仁
Kuo-Jen Tsang
俞明瑤
Ming Yao Yu
關鍵詞 高夫曼
立足點
角色
立場
新聞提問
廣播新聞訪談
日期 2002
上傳時間 17-九月-2009 15:46:17 (UTC+8)
摘要 論文摘要

本研究旨在根據Goffman立足點理論中之角色與立場之概念，瞭解記者如何在正式新聞訪談中藉由提問建立與受訪者之互動關係。本文以語用學有關語言行為論的角度分析提問之角色與立場，瞭解新聞訪談如何透過提問發展立足點以建立問答中的人際關係。

依「立足點相關研究」得知，所謂「立足點」意指互動中的說話者選擇面對自己與他人的說話角色與立場發展互動關係。而「角色」指說話方式，包括表演者、著作者與意見來源，而「立場」指說話位置，包括訪問者與受訪者一致或偏離等的位置。

　　研究結果發現，提問立足點之角色包含訪問者表達私人意見的「著作者」、報導事實資訊的「報導者」與傳述消息來源意見的「傳述者」，此有別於Goffman的角色分類系統。在立場分類中包含「傾向」、「中立」與「偏離」於受訪者的立場表現，而透過角色與立場的結合發展不同情境下的提問立足點，因此角色與立場兩者應為相互合作的關係。

提問立足點與訪談關係變化中，訪問者可表達「著作者傾向」立場以認同或補充受訪者的回答，此可發展彼此親近的關係。訪問者亦可以「著作偏離或對立」立場質疑受訪者觀點，藉此發展疏離的關係，或以建立受訪者人情面子的間接提問立足點來拉近互動等。

　　從本研究結果可知，提問立足點係訪問者操控與受訪者關係變化的資源，因而訪問者不再僅是中立客觀的提問角色與立場，而是可在著作意見、報導事實資訊與傳述他人意見中表達特定立場，以於認同或質疑受訪者的立場間來回移動。
參考文獻 【參考書目】
一、中文部分
方怡文、周慶祥(1999)。《新聞採訪理論與實務》。台北：正中。
王洪鈞(1990)。《新聞報導學》。台北：正中。
石麗東(1991)。《當代新聞報導》。台北：正中。　
李金銓 (1981)。《大眾傳播理論》。台北：三民。
李森堙 (1998)。〈廣播call-in節目的對話文體分析〉。國立政治大學新聞所碩士論文。
李茂政 (2000)。《當代新聞學》。台北：正中。　
胡幼慧主編 (1996)。《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。
高明凱、王安石主編 (1962)。《語言學概論》。台北：中華。
康永欽（1997）。〈記實避禍的新聞處理策略之研究〉。國立政治大新聞所碩士論文。
翁維薇（2000）。〈新聞訪問之追問研究--以模糊及迴避回答為例〉。國立政治大新聞所碩士論文。
陳原 (2001)。《語言與社會生活》。台北：台灣商務。
陳蕙芬（1999）。〈政治人物對話過程中用意行為之探究〉。中國文化大學西洋文學研究所德文組碩士論文。
陳淑欣 (2000)。〈政治言談中的人稱代詞：1998年台北市長選舉辯論中之人稱代詞使用研究〉。國立清華大學語言學研究所碩士論文。
喻靖媛 (1994)。〈記者與消息來源互動關係與新聞處理方式關聯性之研究〉。國立政治大學新聞所碩士論文。
湯池亭（1981）。〈國語疑問句的研究〉。《師大學報》, 26, 1-56。
黃光國 (1988)。《中國人的權力遊戲》。台北：巨流。
張鐘尹（1997）。〈漢語會話中的疑問句〉。台灣大學語言所碩士論文。
張瓊文(1998)。〈新聞用語中再現人際關係的語言策略：以第九屆總統直選報紙用語為例〉。國立政治大學語言所碩士論文
臧國仁 (2000)。〈關於傳播學如何教的一些想法--以「基礎新聞採寫」課為例〉，《新聞學研究》, 65, 19-56。
蔡曙山（2000）。《言語行為和語用邏輯》。北京：中國社會科學出版社。
鍾蔚文\\臧國仁\\陳百齡\\陳順孝 (1997)。〈探討記者工作的知識基礎--建立分析架構〉，中華傳播學會1997年學術研討會宣讀論文(台北縣深坑鄉：世新會館)。
謝國平 (1992)。《語言學概論》。台北：三民。
二、英文部分
Argyle, M.; Furnham, A., ;and Graham, J.A.(1979).《社會情境》。張君玫譯。台北：巨流。
Augsburger, D. (1992). Conflict mediation across cultures: Pathways and patterns.
Louisville, Kentucky: Westminister/John Knox Press.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
Biagi, Shirley (1992). Interviews that work : A practical guide for journalists. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Pub.
Briggs, C. L. (1986 ). Learning how to ask--A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. London : Cambridge University Press.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Universal in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bull, Peter (1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(2),115-131.
Chang, H. C. (2001). Harmony as performance: The turbulence under Chinese interpersonal communication. Discourse Studies, 3(2), 155-179.
Chung, W. W., Tsang, K. J., Chen, P. L., and Chen, S. H. (1998). Journalistic　expertise: Proposal for a research programme. Paper presented in the ICA Convention. Jerusalem, Israel, July: 20-24.
Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: the case of news interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings.
London: Cambridge University Press.
Clayman, S. E. & J. Heritage (2002). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarial ness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication. 52(4), 749-772.
Cohen, Akiba A. (1987) The television news interview. CA: Sage Publications.
Collins, R. (1988). Theoretical continuities in Goffman’s work. In P. Drew & A. Wotton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
De Fina, Anna (1995). Pronominal choice, identity and solidarity in political discourse. Text(15)3: 679-710.
Dickerson, P. ( 2001). Disputing with care: Analyzing interviewee’s treatment interviewers prior turns in televised political interviews. Discourse Studies, 3(2) , 203-222.
Dillon, J. T . (1990). The practice of questioning. London: Routledge.
Drew, P. & J. Heritage. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. London: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P. & Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. (1997). Institutional dialogue. In Teun A.van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction, 2, 92-118.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Freed, Alice F. (1994). The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 621-644.
Geis, M. L. (1995). Speech acts and conversational interaction. London: Cambridge University Press.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2001). Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1881-1900.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on the face to face behavior. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis : an essay on the organization of experience Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goody, E. N. (1978). Questions and politeness : Strategies in social interaction. London: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3( Speech acts). New York: Academic Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies . London: Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1992a). Contextualization revisited. In Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (Eds.), The Contextulization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Gumperz, J. J. (1992b). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp.229-252). London: Cambridge University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hamel, J., Dufour, S., & Fortin, D. (1993). Case study methods. Newbury. Park, CA: Sage
Publications.
Hanks, W. F. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Chicago: Westview.
Hasan, R. (1995). The conception of context in text. In P.H. Fries & M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society: Systematic functional perspectives (pp.183-283).Norwood NJ: Albex.
Harris, S. (1989). Defendant resistance to power and control in court. In Hywel Coleman (Ed.), Working with language. Berlin: Monton de Gruyter.
Heller, Monica. (1988). Code-switching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.
Heritage, J. C. & Greatbatch, D. L. (1993). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure--Studies in ethnomethdology and conversation analysis. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Heritage, J. C. & Roth, A. L. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 28(1), 1-60.
Hoyle, S. M.(1993). Participation frameworks in sports casting play: Imaginary and literal footings. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 114-145.
Huesca, R., & Dervin, B. (1996). Rethinking the journalistic interview: Empowering sources to name the world. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.
Jucker, A. (1986). News Interviews: A pragmalinguistic analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press.
Kinney, Carolyn J. (1998). Role, stance, and footing: A frame analysis of leaders’ talk in a small group discussion. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of the Graduate School of Georgetown University.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman, NY: Linguistics Library.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Studies in interact ional sociolinguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Macaulay, M. (2001). Tough talk : Indirectness and gender in requests for information. Journal of Pragmatics , 33, 293-316.
Malone, M. J. (1997). Worlds of talk. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Matoesian, G. M. (1999). The grammaticalization of participation roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society, 28, 491-521.
Metzler, Ken (1989). Creative interviewing: The writer’s guide to gathering information by asking questions. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Morris, C. W. (1946). Signs, language and behavior. New York : Prentice-Hall.
Renkema, Jan(1993). Discourse studies: An introductory textbook. John Benjamins Publishing Co.
Schiffrin, D.(1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Scollon, R & Scollon, S.(1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech act. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics . New York: Academic Press.
Searle, J. R. (1998). Indirect speech act. In Asa Kasher (Ed.), Pragmatics: Critical concepts. London: Routledge.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen (1996). Reconsidering power and distance. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 9-20.
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stewart, C.J & Cash, Jr. W.B. (1988). Interview：Principles and practices. Iowa : WCB.
Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. London: Basil Blackwell Ltd.
Tannen, D. (1979). What is in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Roy Freedle (Ed.), New Directions in Discourse Processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 137-181.
Tannen, Deborah (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction .Oxford University Press: New York, 165-188.
Tannen, D. & Cynthia, Wallat (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination and interview. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 57-76.
Taylor, T. J. & Cameron, Deborah (1987). Conversation analysis: Speech act theory and conversation analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Longman Group Limited.
Thornborrow, J. (2001). Questions, control and the organization of talk in calls to a radio phone-in. Discourse studies, 3(1), 119-123.
van Dijk, T. A. (1987). News Analysis: Case studies of international and national news in press. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: SAGE Publications.
Weizman, E. (1985). Towards an analysis of opaque utterances: Hints as a request strategy. Theoretical linguistics, 12(2/3), 153-163.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
Zonabend, F. (1992). The monograph in European ethnology. Current Sociology, 40(1), 49-60.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
新聞研究所
88451013
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088451013
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 臧國仁zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Kuo-Jen Tsangen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 俞明瑤zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Ming Yao Yuen_US
dc.creator (作者) 俞明瑤zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Ming Yao Yuen_US
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-九月-2009 15:46:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-九月-2009 15:46:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-九月-2009 15:46:17 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0088451013en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33198-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 新聞研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 88451013zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 論文摘要

本研究旨在根據Goffman立足點理論中之角色與立場之概念，瞭解記者如何在正式新聞訪談中藉由提問建立與受訪者之互動關係。本文以語用學有關語言行為論的角度分析提問之角色與立場，瞭解新聞訪談如何透過提問發展立足點以建立問答中的人際關係。

依「立足點相關研究」得知，所謂「立足點」意指互動中的說話者選擇面對自己與他人的說話角色與立場發展互動關係。而「角色」指說話方式，包括表演者、著作者與意見來源，而「立場」指說話位置，包括訪問者與受訪者一致或偏離等的位置。

　　研究結果發現，提問立足點之角色包含訪問者表達私人意見的「著作者」、報導事實資訊的「報導者」與傳述消息來源意見的「傳述者」，此有別於Goffman的角色分類系統。在立場分類中包含「傾向」、「中立」與「偏離」於受訪者的立場表現，而透過角色與立場的結合發展不同情境下的提問立足點，因此角色與立場兩者應為相互合作的關係。

提問立足點與訪談關係變化中，訪問者可表達「著作者傾向」立場以認同或補充受訪者的回答，此可發展彼此親近的關係。訪問者亦可以「著作偏離或對立」立場質疑受訪者觀點，藉此發展疏離的關係，或以建立受訪者人情面子的間接提問立足點來拉近互動等。

　　從本研究結果可知，提問立足點係訪問者操控與受訪者關係變化的資源，因而訪問者不再僅是中立客觀的提問角色與立場，而是可在著作意見、報導事實資訊與傳述他人意見中表達特定立場，以於認同或質疑受訪者的立場間來回移動。		zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 章節目錄

第一章、語言、角色與社會互動的啟示
1.1 研究動機……………………………………..……………………..…………..2
1.2 記者提問相關研究整理……………………………………………..………...3
1.3 問題意識……………………………………………………………..………...7
1.4 本章小結…………………………………………………………….………..10

第二章、文獻探討—「立足點」與「新聞提問」之探討
2.1 立足點概念……………………………………………………………………11
2.2 立足點之語用學觀點…………………………………………………………17
2.3 新聞訪談情境與記者提問立足點之關聯性………………………………....31
2.4本章小結.………………………………………………………………………37

第三章、研究方法
3.1 研究問題………………………………………………………………….…..40
3.2 研究架構…..………………………………………………………….………41　　
3.3 研究概念定義…………………………………………….…………………..41
3.4 研究方法………………………………………………….………….……….47
3.5分析單位………………………………………………….…………….…..…53
3.6 研究步驟說明…………………………………………….…………….….…55
3.7 前測分析………………………………………….………….………….……58
3.8本章小結…………………………………………….……….…………….….65

第四章、資料蒐集與分析
4.1 研究問題簡述……………………………………….………………………66
4.2 研究個案背景說明………………………………….………………………66
4.3 個案分析說明………………………………………..………………………68
4.4 本章小結……………………………………………..……………………..101

第五章 結論與研究建議
5.1研究摘要………………………………………………………………….102
5.2 研究發現說明……………………………………………………………103
5.3 研究命題建立……………………………………………………………115
5.4 研究架構的修正………………………………………………………….118
5.5 研究意涵討論…………………………………………………………….119
5.6 研究建議………………………………………………………………….128
5.7 研究限制………………………………………………………………….133

參考書目 ………………………………………………………………………..136

附錄……………………………………………………………………………….144		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 15973 bytes-
dc.format.extent 17974 bytes-
dc.format.extent 17441 bytes-
dc.format.extent 20817 bytes-
dc.format.extent 38333 bytes-
dc.format.extent 92938 bytes-
dc.format.extent 76684 bytes-
dc.format.extent 102273 bytes-
dc.format.extent 91362 bytes-
dc.format.extent 38810 bytes-
dc.format.extent 96870 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088451013en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 高夫曼zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立足點zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 角色zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立場zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 新聞提問zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 廣播新聞訪談zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 新聞訪談提問之立足點研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 【參考書目】zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 方怡文、周慶祥(1999)。《新聞採訪理論與實務》。台北：正中。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 王洪鈞(1990)。《新聞報導學》。台北：正中。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 石麗東(1991)。《當代新聞報導》。台北：正中。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李金銓 (1981)。《大眾傳播理論》。台北：三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李森堙 (1998)。〈廣播call-in節目的對話文體分析〉。國立政治大學新聞所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李茂政 (2000)。《當代新聞學》。台北：正中。　zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡幼慧主編 (1996)。《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 高明凱、王安石主編 (1962)。《語言學概論》。台北：中華。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 康永欽（1997）。〈記實避禍的新聞處理策略之研究〉。國立政治大新聞所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 翁維薇（2000）。〈新聞訪問之追問研究--以模糊及迴避回答為例〉。國立政治大新聞所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳原 (2001)。《語言與社會生活》。台北：台灣商務。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳蕙芬（1999）。〈政治人物對話過程中用意行為之探究〉。中國文化大學西洋文學研究所德文組碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳淑欣 (2000)。〈政治言談中的人稱代詞：1998年台北市長選舉辯論中之人稱代詞使用研究〉。國立清華大學語言學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 喻靖媛 (1994)。〈記者與消息來源互動關係與新聞處理方式關聯性之研究〉。國立政治大學新聞所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯池亭（1981）。〈國語疑問句的研究〉。《師大學報》, 26, 1-56。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃光國 (1988)。《中國人的權力遊戲》。台北：巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張鐘尹（1997）。〈漢語會話中的疑問句〉。台灣大學語言所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張瓊文(1998)。〈新聞用語中再現人際關係的語言策略：以第九屆總統直選報紙用語為例〉。國立政治大學語言所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 臧國仁 (2000)。〈關於傳播學如何教的一些想法--以「基礎新聞採寫」課為例〉，《新聞學研究》, 65, 19-56。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡曙山（2000）。《言語行為和語用邏輯》。北京：中國社會科學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 鍾蔚文\\臧國仁\\陳百齡\\陳順孝 (1997)。〈探討記者工作的知識基礎--建立分析架構〉，中華傳播學會1997年學術研討會宣讀論文(台北縣深坑鄉：世新會館)。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 謝國平 (1992)。《語言學概論》。台北：三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Argyle, M.; Furnham, A., ;and Graham, J.A.(1979).《社會情境》。張君玫譯。台北：巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Augsburger, D. (1992). Conflict mediation across cultures: Pathways and patterns.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Louisville, Kentucky: Westminister/John Knox Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Biagi, Shirley (1992). Interviews that work : A practical guide for journalists. Belmont, California: Wadsworth Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Briggs, C. L. (1986 ). Learning how to ask--A sociolinguistic appraisal of the role of the interview in social science research. London : Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1978). Universal in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bull, Peter (1994). On identifying questions, replies, and non-replies in political interviews. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13(2),115-131.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chang, H. C. (2001). Harmony as performance: The turbulence under Chinese interpersonal communication. Discourse Studies, 3(2), 155-179.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chung, W. W., Tsang, K. J., Chen, P. L., and Chen, S. H. (1998). Journalistic　expertise: Proposal for a research programme. Paper presented in the ICA Convention. Jerusalem, Israel, July: 20-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clayman, S. E. (1992). Footing in the achievement of neutrality: the case of news interview discourse. In P. Drew & J. Heritage. Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) London: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clayman, S. E. & J. Heritage (2002). Questioning presidents: Journalistic deference and adversarial ness in the press conferences of U.S. presidents Eisenhower and Reagan. Journal of Communication. 52(4), 749-772.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cohen, Akiba A. (1987) The television news interview. CA: Sage Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Collins, R. (1988). Theoretical continuities in Goffman’s work. In P. Drew & A. Wotton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) De Fina, Anna (1995). Pronominal choice, identity and solidarity in political discourse. Text(15)3: 679-710.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dickerson, P. ( 2001). Disputing with care: Analyzing interviewee’s treatment interviewers prior turns in televised political interviews. Discourse Studies, 3(2) , 203-222.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dillon, J. T . (1990). The practice of questioning. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Drew, P. & J. Heritage. (1992). Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings. London: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Drew, P. & Sorjonen, Marja-Leena. (1997). Institutional dialogue. In Teun A.van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction, 2, 92-118.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Freed, Alice F. (1994). The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 21, 621-644.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Geis, M. L. (1995). Speech acts and conversational interaction. London: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Georgakopoulou, A. (2001). Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33, 1881-1900.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on the face to face behavior. Harmondsworth: Penguin.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis : an essay on the organization of experience Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goody, E. N. (1978). Questions and politeness : Strategies in social interaction. London: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3( Speech acts). New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies . London: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gumperz, J. J. (1992a). Contextualization revisited. In Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (Eds.), The Contextulization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gumperz, J. J. (1992b). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp.229-252). London: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hamel, J., Dufour, S., & Fortin, D. (1993). Case study methods. Newbury. Park, CA: Sagezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hanks, W. F. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Chicago: Westview.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hasan, R. (1995). The conception of context in text. In P.H. Fries & M. Gregory (Eds.), Discourse in society: Systematic functional perspectives (pp.183-283).Norwood NJ: Albex.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harris, S. (1989). Defendant resistance to power and control in court. In Hywel Coleman (Ed.), Working with language. Berlin: Monton de Gruyter.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Heller, Monica. (1988). Code-switching: Anthropological and sociolinguistic perspectives. Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Heritage, J. C. & Greatbatch, D. L. (1993). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure--Studies in ethnomethdology and conversation analysis. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Heritage, J. C. & Roth, A. L. (1995). Grammar and institution: Questions and questioning in the broadcast news interview. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 28(1), 1-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoyle, S. M.(1993). Participation frameworks in sports casting play: Imaginary and literal footings. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 114-145.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huesca, R., & Dervin, B. (1996). Rethinking the journalistic interview: Empowering sources to name the world. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Washington, DC.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jucker, A. (1986). News Interviews: A pragmalinguistic analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kinney, Carolyn J. (1998). Role, stance, and footing: A frame analysis of leaders’ talk in a small group discussion. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of the Graduate School of Georgetown University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman, NY: Linguistics Library.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levinson, S. C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman’s concepts of participation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Levinson, S. C. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Studies in interact ional sociolinguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Macaulay, M. (2001). Tough talk : Indirectness and gender in requests for information. Journal of Pragmatics , 33, 293-316.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Malone, M. J. (1997). Worlds of talk. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Matoesian, G. M. (1999). The grammaticalization of participation roles in the constitution of expert identity. Language in Society, 28, 491-521.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Metzler, Ken (1989). Creative interviewing: The writer’s guide to gathering information by asking questions. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morris, C. W. (1946). Signs, language and behavior. New York : Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Renkema, Jan(1993). Discourse studies: An introductory textbook. John Benjamins Publishing Co.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schiffrin, D.(1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Cambridge: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scollon, R & Scollon, S.(1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. London: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech act. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics . New York: Academic Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Searle, J. R. (1998). Indirect speech act. In Asa Kasher (Ed.), Pragmatics: Critical concepts. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spencer-Oatey, Helen (1996). Reconsidering power and distance. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 9-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stewart, C.J & Cash, Jr. W.B. (1988). Interview：Principles and practices. Iowa : WCB.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language. London: Basil Blackwell Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tannen, D. (1979). What is in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Roy Freedle (Ed.), New Directions in Discourse Processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 137-181.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tannen, Deborah (1993). The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Gender and conversational interaction .Oxford University Press: New York, 165-188.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tannen, D. & Cynthia, Wallat (1993). Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: Examples from a medical examination and interview. In Deborah Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse. New York: Oxford University Press, 57-76.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Taylor, T. J. & Cameron, Deborah (1987). Conversation analysis: Speech act theory and conversation analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Longman Group Limited.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thornborrow, J. (2001). Questions, control and the organization of talk in calls to a radio phone-in. Discourse studies, 3(1), 119-123.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) van Dijk, T. A. (1987). News Analysis: Case studies of international and national news in press. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) van Dijk, T. A. (1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: SAGE Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Weizman, E. (1985). Towards an analysis of opaque utterances: Hints as a request strategy. Theoretical linguistics, 12(2/3), 153-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zonabend, F. (1992). The monograph in European ethnology. Current Sociology, 40(1), 49-60.zh_TW