| dc.contributor.advisor | 方孝謙 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Fong, Shiaw Chian | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 朱峰誼 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Chu, Feng Yi | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 朱峰誼 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Chu, Feng Yi | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2006 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 15:49:07 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 15:49:07 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 15:49:07 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0093451013 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33219 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 新聞研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93451013 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本研究主要目的有二：一是探討陳水扁支持者（扁迷）對阿扁之情感與認同，二是檢討傳統迷文化理論和Laclau與Mouffe論述理論在分析扁迷現象時的可能缺失，並提出一個新的整合性理論架構。以深度訪談作為方法、傳統迷文化理論作為背景理論，本研究發現扁迷們透過身體實踐，表達自己對阿扁本人與其背後符號意義的支持；這些意義包括台灣國族意識、公平正義、偶像特質與青年認同。除上述意義之外，「為了自己」、「為了社群」是扁迷支持阿扁更核心的驅力；前者顯現在扁迷的各種認同與防衛機制上，後者則展現在其政治理念成形時的親身傳播中。然而，傳統迷文化理論卻無法解釋阿扁符號意義與扁迷情感／認同的變遷過程，Laclau與Mouffe的空符徵架構雖然得以適切說明意義與認同改變時遭遇的符號與自我分裂，但亦無法真正指出符號變遷時的關鍵因子。本研究認為，唯有整合此二理論、強調符號論述的開放性與主體之能動性，並體認符號文本、個體與社群三者缺一不可的緊密相關性，才能真正完整地說明、解釋此一政治迷（扁迷）現象。同時考量上述條件，我們將獲得一個新的、三重三元性（3 x 3）的整合式理論架構；而任何得以此架構解釋分析之個體行為，我們稱之為「道德實踐」。這不僅強調個體進行道德抉擇的能動性，亦強調其背後以各種符號秩序中介的社群規範。扁迷作為一種道德實踐，並不在正當化扁迷所認同之價值體系為一普遍性道德「內容」，而在說明扁迷，在本質上，即為一種道德實踐「形式」。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | Two aims the present research has. The first is to investigate the feelings and identifications of President Chen Shui-Bian’s (A-Bian) supporters (Bian’s fans). The second is to discuss the suitability of applying traditional fan culture theory and Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory in explaining this political-cult phenomenon, and to propose a novel, integrated one. Using in-depth interview as research method and fan culture theory as base, the present research suggests that through body practices, Bian’s fans actualize their support toward A-Bian and various symbolic meanings behind him. These symbolic meanings include Taiwan nationalism, justice, idol characteristics and youth identifications. Besides these meanings, ‘for self’ and ‘for the community’ are more the core motives of supporting A-Bian. The former could be observed in the identifications and defense mechanisms of Bian’s fans, while the latter is concluded both from the importance of interpersonal communication, and from the role of communities in the political-ideas modeling of Bian’s fans. As for the theoretical discussion, traditional fan culture theory fails to explain the conversion of A-Bian symbols and that of Bian’s fans’ identifications. Although Laclau and Mouffe’s idea of empty signifier can properly illustrate the symbolic and self divisions in those conversions, it still fails to designate the key element triggering this process. The present research suggests that only combining these two theories (that is, stressing not only on the openness of structures as Laclau’s discourse theory does, but also on the agency of subjects like fan culture theory does), and recognizing the intimate connection among symbols, subjects and communities, can we thoroughly and really understand this political-cults phenomenon. Considering the principles above, we shall eventually infer a new, integrated, triple-triplets (3 x 3) theory. Every action explainable by this frame could be termed as ‘moral practice’ not only for stressing on the agency in subject’s moral decision making, but also for emphasizing the significant role of social norms behind it. Regarding being Bian’s fans as a moral practice is not justifying the values they hold to any universal ethic contents, but illustrating that being Bian’s fans is essentially a form of moral practicing. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 壹、研究問題................................................1 一、前言................................................1 二、章節架構............................................6貳、背景理論...............................................11 一、迷文化理論／迷文本...................................11 二、迷文化理論／迷現象之定義.............................18 三、迷文化理論／迷現象之詮釋.............................26 四、符號意義的改變......................................35參、研究方法...............................................41 一、扁迷之操作型定義....................................41 二、資料收集架構........................................42 三、研究設計...........................................46肆、資料分析...............................................51 一、關於阿扁...........................................52 二、關於扁迷...........................................69 三、關於社群...........................................81 四、阿扁符號意義的改變..................................99伍、理論辯證..............................................109 一、阿扁符號的多義.....................................109 二、決斷：系統外部個體的倫理行動.........................113 三、重訪系統內部性與外部性..............................117 四、拆解主體的必要性...................................119 五、拆解符號之必要性...................................122 六、社群作為理論因子的必要性之一／主體：為了自己...........125 七、社群作為理論因子的必要性之二／符號：為了合法化.........130 八、三重三元性（3 x 3）理論架構.........................132陸、結論..................................................134 一、資料分析部分.......................................134 二、理論辯證部分.......................................137 三、扁迷作為一種道德實踐................................140 四、限制與建議.........................................144參考文獻.................................................147附錄：訪談節錄............................................153 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 42652 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 110701 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 73373 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 79702 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 224197 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 365321 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 170913 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 534060 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 306666 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 218086 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 124529 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 161235 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093451013 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 陳水扁 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 扁迷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 迷文化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 論述 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 符號 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Chen Shui-Bian | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | fan culture | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Laclau | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | discourse | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | symbol | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 扁迷作為一種道德實踐 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Being Bian`s Fans as a Moral Practicing | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 中文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 王宏仁（1999）：〈一九五○年代的台灣階級結構與流動初探〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，36：1-35。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李明璁（2004）：〈「親日」的情感結構，與「哈日」的主體－一個跨世代認同政治的考察〉，台灣社會學會2004年會暨研討會論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李宜穆（2003）：《阿扁的心情筆記－阿扁統總電子報之幻想主題分析》。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李培元（1997）：《政治商品化理論》。臺北市：揚智文化。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 李筱峰（1997）：〈為誰而戰？為何而戰？〉，「台灣人的戰爭經驗回顧展」序說。參考網址：http://www.jimlee.org.tw/article.jsp?b_id=24290&menu_id=6 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林淑芬（2003）：〈政治行動的可能性條件〉，《政治社會哲學評論》，第四期。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 林慧斐（2000）：《台灣N世代選民認知總統候選人形象之研究－公元2000年中華民國總統選舉為例》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳乃德（1993）：〈省籍意識、政治支持和國家認同〉，張茂桂（編）《族群關係與國家認同》。臺北市：業強出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳乃德（1997）：〈檳榔和拖鞋，西裝及皮鞋：台灣階級流動的族群差異及原因〉，《台灣社會學研究》，1：137-167。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 吳蕙芬（1998）：《候選人形象研究：以83年與87年台北市長候選人陳水扁為例》。國立政治大學新聞所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 胡志亮（2002）：《總統形象建構之研究─以陳水扁總統新聞幕僚為例》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 高格孚（2004）：《風和日暖：台灣外省人與國家認同轉變》。臺北市：允晨文化。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 連珊惠（1998）：《從報紙呈現之候選人形象看編輯之守門行為─以中國時報、聯合報、自由時報為例》（報導陳水扁國人風格最多）。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 翁秀琪（1992）：《大眾傳播理論與實證》。臺北市：三民書局股份有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張瑞鴛（2001）：《2000年總統大選競選組織策略分析》。世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 張茂桂（1993）：〈省籍問題與民族主義〉，張茂桂（編）《族群關係與國家認同》。臺北市：業強出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳文俊（1997）：《台灣的族群政治》。香港：社會科學出版社。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳光興（2001）：〈為什麼大和解不／可能？〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，43：41-110。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳信助（1999）：《候選人形象研究：以兩千年總統大選候選人連戰、宋楚瑜、陳水扁為例》。淡江大學大眾傳播所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 陳麗婷（1998）：《1998台北市長選舉三黨候選人文宣策略之分析》。中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 莊佳穎（2002）：《阿扁的異想世界---以幻想主題分析方法閱讀陳水扁風潮》。輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃秀（1999）：《政治人物在大眾傳播媒介中的形象研究－以台視、中視、民視及無線衛星電視台對陳水扁報導為例》。國立政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 黃靖麟（2000）：《族群意識、統獨立場對選民行為的影響：一九九四年與一九九八年台北市市長選舉比較分析》。中國文化大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廖益興（2004）：《候選人競選行為及其效能之研究：以台灣2000年總統選舉為例》。國立政治大學政治研究所博士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 廖唯超（2000）：《2000年總統大選候選人報紙競選廣告之形象塑造研究》。國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 劉仲冬（1996）：〈量與質社會研究的爭議及社會研究未來的走向及出路〉，胡幼慧（編）《質性研究 理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。臺北市：巨流圖書有限公司。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 謝承璋（2003）：《台灣選民的策略性投票行為：以2000年總統選舉為例》。國立中山大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 簡妙如（1995）：《過度的閱聽人－「迷」之初探》。國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 簡鈺珒（2002）：《2000年總統選舉選民投票抉擇分析》。國立中正大學政治學研究所碩士論文。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Raper, A.F.（雷柏爾）（1954）：《台灣之城市與工業》（全漢昇、陳紹馨譯）。台北：美國國外業務總署駐華共同安全分署，臺灣大學。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 英文部分 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Abercrombie and Longhurst. (1998) Audience: A Sociological Theory of Performance and Imagination. Newbury Park: Sage. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ang, I. 1985. Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. London: Methuen. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Baym, N. 2000. Tuin in, Log on: Soap, Fandom and Online Community. London: Sage. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bennett, T. and Woollacott, J. 1987. Bond and Beyond: The Political Career of a Popular Hero. London: Macmillan. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bourdier, P. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brooker, W. 2000. Batman Unmasked: Analysing a Culture Icon. London: Continuum. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brown, A. 1998. Fanatics! Power, Identity and Fandom in | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Football. London: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Certeau, M. de 1984. The Practice of Everyday Life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cottet, P. 2000. Rene Girard and the mimetic desire / René Girard et l`hypothèse du désir mimétique. Available on: http://www.cottet.org/girard/index.en.htm | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Elliott, A. 1999. The Mourning of John Lennon. Berkeley: University of California Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fiske, J. 1989. Understanding Popular Culture. Boston: Unwin and Hyman. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Foucault, M. 1981. The History of Sexuality. Volume I, An Introduction. Harmondsworth: Penguin. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Freud, S. 1923. Ich und das Es. Tr. J. Riviere, 1962. New York: W. W. Norton. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Frith, S. 1978. The Sociology of Rock. London: Constable. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Genette, G. 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Translated by J.E. Lewin. Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gibberman, S.R. 1991. ‘Star Trek’: An Annotated Guide to Resources on the Development, the Phenomenon, the People, the Television Series, the Films, the Novels and the Recordings. Jefferson: McFarland. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Girard, R. 1976. Deceit, desire, and the novel: self and other in literary structure. Tr. Y. Freccero. London: Johns Hopkins University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gray, J. 2003. New Audiences, New Textualities. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 6-1: 64-81. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hedbige, D. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Methuen. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hegel, G. 1955. The phenomenology of mind. New York: The Macmillan Company. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hills, M. 2002. Fan Cultures. London; New York: Routledge.（中譯本：朱華瑄譯，臺北市韋伯文化2005年九月出版。） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Klein, M. 1946/2000. Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanism. In P. Du Gay, J. Evans and P. Redman Eds. Identity: A Reader. London: Sage. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lacan, J. 1988. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I: Freud’s Paper on Technique (1953-1954). Ed. J.A. Miller. Tr. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | J. Forrester. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Laclau, E. & Mouff, C. 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London: Verso.（中譯本：陳墇津譯，台北市遠流1994年出版。） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Laclau, E. 1990. New Reflections on The Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Laclau, E. 1996a. Deconstruction, Pragmatism, Hegemony. In C. Mouffe (Ed.) Deconstruction and Paragmatism. London: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Laclau, E.1996b. Emancipation(s). London: Verso. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lavery, D. (Ed.) 1995. Full of Secrets: Critical Approaches to ‘Twin Peaks’. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lavery, D., Hague, A. and Cartwright, M. (Eds) 1996. Deny All Knowledge: Reading the X-Files. London: Faber and Faber. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lukács, G. 1971. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marcus G.E., Neuman W.R. and MacKuen M. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Marcus G.E. 2002. The Sentimental Citizen: Emotion in Democratic Politics. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Mulgan, G. 1994. Politics in an Anti-Political Age. London: Polity Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pearson, R.E. and Uricchio, W. (Eds) 1991. The Many Lives of the Batman: Critical Approaches to a Superhero and his Media. London: Pluto Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Riesman, D. 1990. Listening to Popular Music. In S. Frith and A. Goodwin (eds) On Record: Rock, Pop and the Written Word. New York: Pantheon. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rubin, Allen. 1993. Research methods for social work. Pacific Grove, Calif.: Brooks/Cole.（中譯本：趙碧華、朱美珍譯，臺北市學富文化2001年出版。） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sandvoss, C. 2005. Fans: The Mirror of Consumption. Cambridge: Polity Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Saussure, F. 1964. Course in general linguistics. London: Peter Owen. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stacey, J. 1994. Stargazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. London: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stolle, D., Hooghe, M. & Micheletti, M. 2005. Politics in the Supermarket: Political Consumerism as a Form of Political Participation. International Political Science Review, Vol 26, No. 3: 245–269. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Storey, J. 1999. Cultural consumption and everyday life. London: Arnold.（中譯本：張君玫譯，臺北市巨流2002年出版。） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thomas, L. 2002. Fans, feminisms and `quality` media. London; New York: Routledge. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Weber, M. 1918. Politics as Vocation. Gesammelte politische Schriften. Tübingen: Mohr (Paul Siebeck). | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Williams, R. 1977. Structure of Feeling. In his Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Willis, P. 1978. Profane Cultures. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Žižek, S. 1999. The Ticklish Subject: the absent centre of political ontology. New York: Verso.（中譯本：萬毓澤譯，台北市桂冠出版社2004年出版。） | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Zoonen, L. 2004. Imagining the Fan Democracy. European Journal of Communication, Vol 19-1: 39-52. | zh_TW |
