1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. 外國語文學院
  4. 學位論文
  5. Item

學術產出-學位論文

文章檢視/開啟

書目匯出

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

引文資訊

TAIR相關學術產出

題名 女性特質的革命：論安•瑞克麗芙之《烏多夫堡秘辛》中感性、女權和女性獨立自主的觀點
A Revolution in Female Manners: Sensibility, Women`s Rights and Independence in Ann Radcliffe`s The Mysteries of Udolpho
作者 李政慧
Li, Zheng-hui
貢獻者 王心玲
Wang, Hsin-ling
李政慧
Li, Zheng-hui
關鍵詞 Ann Radcliffe
feminism
Gothic Novel
sensibility
Udolpho
日期 2002
上傳時間 17-九月-2009 16:14:09 (UTC+8)
摘要 論文提要內容：
本篇論文旨在探討安•瑞克麗芙之《烏多夫堡秘辛》中十八世紀女性如何藉改造自身特質，逆轉身處不平等的劣勢。同時並引用瑪麗•烏爾史東考夫特的自由女性主義來分析小說文本。在小說中，瑞氏藉由女主角的冒險故事來剖析十八世紀的女性如何在父權社會中抗拒屈從，堅持自我存在的價值和追尋個人幸福。
本論文共分為五章。第一章概述瑞氏生平背景、作品特性、本小說之寫作背景、古今評論對本小說之評價，以及分析本文所應用的理論。第二章與第三章側重瑞氏對十八世紀之「感性」（sensibility）的分析。註1瑞氏在小說中以許多篇幅描寫「感性」對當時女性的深遠影響，並探討其正、反兩面的價值。有鑑於此，第二章討論瑞氏對「感性」強化女性膚淺、非理性等負面特質的批判。第三章探討瑞氏如何運用「感性」中知性、理性、利他三種正面價值來改變女性軟弱無能的特質。第四章乃瑞氏在小說中對於女權和女性獨立自主觀點之分析。最後一章為結論兼及小說寫作和瑞氏作品的貢獻。
Abstract

In The Mysteries of Udolpho Ann Radcliffe describes the story of a young, middle-class woman. She illustrates how the innocent, sensitive protagonist fights against oppression, defends her value and finds her own happiness in the male dominated world. By describing the protagonist’s opposition to subordination, Radcliffe points out the necessity of changing women’s manners. The writer of this thesis explores Radcliffe’s concern with the social inferiority of women in The Mysteries of Udolpho. The writer also applies Mary Wollstonecraft’s liberal feminist thought in her discussion of Radcliffe.
This thesis is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is a general introduction. It includes Ann Radcliffe and her works, the critical response, the theory employed in the textual analysis, namely Wollstonecraft’s liberal feminist thought and an overview of the eighteenth-century sensibility. The second chapter focuses on Radcliffe’s attack of the false sensibility and how it distorts the nature of women. The third chapter centers on the virtuous sensibility and how it functions as the power to reverse women’s social inferiority. In the fourth chapter, the stress will be laid upon issues of marriage, property and the meaning of independent women. The concluding chapter discusses the contribution of Radcliffe as novelist.
參考文獻 Works Cited
Alexander, Meena. Women in Romanticism: Mary Wollstonecraft, Dorothy Wordsworth and Mary Shelly. Hamsphire and London: Macmillan, 1989.
Anonymous. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” British Critic 4 August 1794 : 110-21.
Anonymous. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” European Magazine and London Review 25 June 1794 : 433-40.
Batchelor, Rhonda. “The Rise and Fall of the Eighteenth Century’s Authentic Feminine Voice.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 6.4 (1994) : 347-69.
Botting, Freaud. Gothic. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.
Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. Ed. James T. Boulton. London: Routledge, 1958.
Brophy, Elizabeth Bergen. Women’s Lives and the 18th-Century English Novel. Tempa: U of South Florida, 1991.
Castle, Terry. “The Spectralization of the Other in The Mysteries of Udolpho.” The New Eighteenth Century: Theory, Politics, English Literature. Ed. Felicity Nussbaum and Laura Brown. New York and London: Methuen, 1987. 231-53.
---. Introduction. The Mysteries of Udolpho. By Ann Radcliffe. Ed. Bonamy Dobrée. Oxford and London: Oxofrd UP, 1998. vii-xxvii.
---. Explanatory Note. The Mysteries of Udolpho. By Ann Radcliffe. Ed. Bonamy Dobrée. Oxford and London: Oxofrd UP, 1998. 677.
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Critical Review 11 (1794) : 361-72.
Conger, Syndy MacMillen. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Language of Sensibility. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1994.
Cox, Stephen. “Sensibility as Argument.” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative
Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics. Ed. Syndy McMillen Conger. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1990. 63-82.
Drabble, Margaret, and Jenny Stringer, eds. Oxford Concise Companion to English Literature. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP, 1996.
Dyer, A. V. George. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Analytical Review 19 (1794) : 140-45.
Ellis, Kate Ferguson. “Kidnapped Romance in Ann Radcliffe.” The Contested Castle. Urbana and Chicago: Illinois UP, 1989. 99-128.
Enfield, William. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Monthly Review 15 (1794) : 278-83.
Epstein, Heller Lynne. “Mrs. Radcliffe’s Landscapes: The Influence of Three Landscape Painters on her Nature Descriptions.” Hatrford Studies in Literature 1 (1969) : 107-20.
Gatens, Moria. “ ‘The Oppressed State of my Sex’: Mary Wollstonecraft on Reason, Feeling and Equality.” Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. Ed. Mary Lyndon Shanley and Carole Pateman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 112-29.
---. Feminism and Philosophy: Perspective on Difference and Equality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 9-27.
Genovese, Elizabeth Fox. Feminism Without Illusions: A Critique of Individualism. Chapel Hill: North Carolina UP, 1991.
Graham, Kenneth W. “Emily’s Demon-Lover: The Gothic Revolution and The
Mysteries of Udolpho.” Gothic Fictions: Prohibition/Transgression. New York: AMS Press, 1989. 163-71
Grimshaw, Jean. “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Tensions in Feminist Philosophy.” Socialism, Feminism and Philosophy: A Radical Philosophy Reader. Ed. Sean Sayers and Peter Osborne. London and New York: Routledge. 9-26.
Gray, Martin. A Dictionary of Literary Terms. London: Longman, 1992.
Hume, David. Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. L A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1996. 231.
Inchbald, Elizabeth. A Simple Story. Ed. J. M. S. Tompkins London: Oxford, 1998.
Jacobus, Mary. “‘The Science of Herself’: Scenes of Female Enlightenment.” Romanticism, History, and the Possibilities of Gender: Re-forming Literature 1789-1837. Ed. Tilottama Rajan and Julia M. Wright. New York and London: Cambridge UP, 1998. 241-69.
Johnson, Claudia L. Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender and Sentimentality in the 1790s Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1995.
Jones, Vivien, ed. Women in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge, 1990.
Jump. Harriet Devine. Mary Wollstonecraft: Writer. London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.
Kavanaugh, Julia. “Mr. Radcliffe.” English Women of Letters: Biographical Sketches. London: 1863. 235-52.
Kelly, Gray. “Women Novelist and the French Revolution Debate: Novelizing the
Revolution/Revolutionizing the Novel.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 6.4 (1994) : 369-88.
---. English Fiction of the Romantic Period 1789-1830. London: Longman, 1989. 1-69.
Lange, Lynda. “Rousseau and Modern Feminism.” Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. Ed. Mary London Shanley and Carol Pateman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 95-111.
Lewis, Matthew G. The Life and Correspondence of M. G. Lewis I (1839) : 122-24.
London, April. “Ann Radcliffe in Context: Making the Boundaries of The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Eighteenth-Century Life 10 (1979) : 34-57.
Mackenize, Catriona. “Reason and Sensibility: The Idea of Women’s Self-Governance in the Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft.” Hypatia 8 (1993) : 35-55.
Miles, Robert. Ann Radcliffe: The Great Enchantress. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP, 1995.
Milton, John. Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained. New York and London: Signet, 1968.
Myers, Mitzi. “Sensibility and the ‘Walk of Reason’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Literary Reviews as Cultural Critique.” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics. Ed. Syndy McMillen Conger. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1990. 121-44.
Poovey, Mary. “Ideology and The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Criticism. 21.4 (1979) : 307-331.
Pope, Alexander. An Essay on Men. Ed. Wolfgang Breidert. Hamburg: Meiner, 1993.
Radcliffe, Ann. The Mysteries of Udolpho. Ed. Bonamy Dobrée. Oxford and London: Oxford UP, 1998.
---. “On the Supernatural in Poetry.” New Monthly Magazine 16 (1826) : 145-52.
Reeve, Clara. The Old English Baron: A Gothic Story. Ed. James Trainer. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1977.
Rogers, Deborah D., ed. The Critical Response to Ann Radcliffe. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press, 1994.
Rousseau, Jean Jacques. Émile. Trans. Barbara Foxley. London and New York: Everyman, 1957.
Sambrook, James. The Eighteenth Century: The Intellectual and Cultural Context of Engligh Literature 1700-1789. New York: Longman, 1986.
Shaftesbury, Anthony. “Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times.” Ed. Benjamin Rand. The Life, Unpublished Letters, and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1900. 403.
Skinner, Gillian. Sensibility and Economics in the Novel, 1740-1800. New York: Macmillan, 1999.
Spacks, Patricia Meyer. “Fathers and Daughters: Ann Radcliffe.” Desire and Truth. Chicago and London: Chicago UP, 1990. 147-74.
Stoler, John Andrew. Ann Radcliffe: The Novel of Suspense and Terror. New York: Arno Press, 1980
Todd, Janet, Sensibility. London and New York: Methuen, 1986
---. “‘The Great Enchantress’: Ann Radcliffe.” The Sign of Angellica: Women, Writing and Fiction 1660-1880. New York: Columbia UP, 1989. 253-72.
Tompkins, J. M. S. The Popular Novel in England 1770-1800. Lincoln: Nebraska UP, 1961.
Varma, Devendra. P. The Gothic Flame. New York: Russell and Russell, 1996.
Voller, Jack G. The Supernatural Sublime. Northern: Illinois UP, 1994.
Wang, Orrin N. C. “The Other Reasons: Female Alternative and Enlightenment Discourse in Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.” The Yale Journal of Criticism 5 (1991) : 129-49.
Wardle, Ralph M. “The Intellectual and Historical Background of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.” A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. Carol H. Poston. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1975. 202-07.
Whiting, Patricia. “Literal and Literary Representation of the Family in The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Eighteenth Century Fiction 8.4 (1996) : 485-501.
Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. Carol H. Poston. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1975.
---. “A Vindication of the Rights of Men.” Ed. Janet Todd. A Wollstonecraft Anthology. UK: Polity Press, 1977. 64-83.
---. “Thoughts on the Education of Daughters.” Ed. Vivien Jones. Women in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge, 1990. 110-11.
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
英國語文學研究所
87551008
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0087551008
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 王心玲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Wang, Hsin-lingen_US
dc.contributor.author (作者) 李政慧zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (作者) Li, Zheng-huien_US
dc.creator (作者) 李政慧zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Li, Zheng-huien_US
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-九月-2009 16:14:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-九月-2009 16:14:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-九月-2009 16:14:09 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (其他 識別碼) G0087551008en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33318-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 英國語文學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 87551008zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 論文提要內容：
本篇論文旨在探討安•瑞克麗芙之《烏多夫堡秘辛》中十八世紀女性如何藉改造自身特質，逆轉身處不平等的劣勢。同時並引用瑪麗•烏爾史東考夫特的自由女性主義來分析小說文本。在小說中，瑞氏藉由女主角的冒險故事來剖析十八世紀的女性如何在父權社會中抗拒屈從，堅持自我存在的價值和追尋個人幸福。
本論文共分為五章。第一章概述瑞氏生平背景、作品特性、本小說之寫作背景、古今評論對本小說之評價，以及分析本文所應用的理論。第二章與第三章側重瑞氏對十八世紀之「感性」（sensibility）的分析。註1瑞氏在小說中以許多篇幅描寫「感性」對當時女性的深遠影響，並探討其正、反兩面的價值。有鑑於此，第二章討論瑞氏對「感性」強化女性膚淺、非理性等負面特質的批判。第三章探討瑞氏如何運用「感性」中知性、理性、利他三種正面價值來改變女性軟弱無能的特質。第四章乃瑞氏在小說中對於女權和女性獨立自主觀點之分析。最後一章為結論兼及小說寫作和瑞氏作品的貢獻。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Abstract

In The Mysteries of Udolpho Ann Radcliffe describes the story of a young, middle-class woman. She illustrates how the innocent, sensitive protagonist fights against oppression, defends her value and finds her own happiness in the male dominated world. By describing the protagonist’s opposition to subordination, Radcliffe points out the necessity of changing women’s manners. The writer of this thesis explores Radcliffe’s concern with the social inferiority of women in The Mysteries of Udolpho. The writer also applies Mary Wollstonecraft’s liberal feminist thought in her discussion of Radcliffe.
This thesis is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is a general introduction. It includes Ann Radcliffe and her works, the critical response, the theory employed in the textual analysis, namely Wollstonecraft’s liberal feminist thought and an overview of the eighteenth-century sensibility. The second chapter focuses on Radcliffe’s attack of the false sensibility and how it distorts the nature of women. The third chapter centers on the virtuous sensibility and how it functions as the power to reverse women’s social inferiority. In the fourth chapter, the stress will be laid upon issues of marriage, property and the meaning of independent women. The concluding chapter discusses the contribution of Radcliffe as novelist.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents Table of Contents

Acknowledgements…..………………………………….…………...……………….iii
Chinese Abstract…………………………………………………..…………………...v
English Abstract………………………………………….……………………………vi
Chapter One Introduction……………………………………………………………1
I The Life and Works of Radcliffe…………………………………………1
II The Critical Response……………………………………………………3
III The Theory Employed in the Textual Analysis………………………….8
IV An Overview of the Text and the Context……………………………17
Chapter Two The Socially Constructed Femininity: The False Sensibility…...…...23
I Hypocrisy……………………………………………………………...24
II Self-Interest……………………………………………………………26
III Excessive Passion……………………………………………………..28
IV Submission……………………………………………………………32
V Women’s Excessive Dependence on Beauty……………………………36
Chapter Three The Source of Women’s Power: The Virtuous Sensibility…………40
I Education……….……………………………………………………..41
II Benevolence……………………………………………………………47
III Reason…………..…………………………………………………….51
Chapter Four The Resistance to Social Inferiority:
Women’s Rights and Independence……………………………….…59
I Marriage………….…………………………………………………….59
II Property………….……………………………………………………65
III The Independent Women…….………………………………………..70
Chapter Five Conclusion…..……………….………………………………………78
Works Cited…………………………………………………………………………..83		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 13086 bytes-
dc.format.extent 10681 bytes-
dc.format.extent 13361 bytes-
dc.format.extent 46062 bytes-
dc.format.extent 64235 bytes-
dc.format.extent 48836 bytes-
dc.format.extent 57557 bytes-
dc.format.extent 56634 bytes-
dc.format.extent 23156 bytes-
dc.format.extent 25242 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0087551008en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Ann Radcliffeen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) feminismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Gothic Novelen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) sensibilityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Udolphoen_US
dc.title (題名) 女性特質的革命：論安•瑞克麗芙之《烏多夫堡秘辛》中感性、女權和女性獨立自主的觀點zh_TW
dc.title (題名) A Revolution in Female Manners: Sensibility, Women`s Rights and Independence in Ann Radcliffe`s The Mysteries of Udolphoen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Works Citedzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alexander, Meena. Women in Romanticism: Mary Wollstonecraft, Dorothy Wordsworth and Mary Shelly. Hamsphire and London: Macmillan, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anonymous. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” British Critic 4 August 1794 : 110-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Anonymous. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” European Magazine and London Review 25 June 1794 : 433-40.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Batchelor, Rhonda. “The Rise and Fall of the Eighteenth Century’s Authentic Feminine Voice.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 6.4 (1994) : 347-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Botting, Freaud. Gothic. London and New York: Routledge, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burke, Edmund. A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beautiful. Ed. James T. Boulton. London: Routledge, 1958.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brophy, Elizabeth Bergen. Women’s Lives and the 18th-Century English Novel. Tempa: U of South Florida, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Castle, Terry. “The Spectralization of the Other in The Mysteries of Udolpho.” The New Eighteenth Century: Theory, Politics, English Literature. Ed. Felicity Nussbaum and Laura Brown. New York and London: Methuen, 1987. 231-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. Introduction. The Mysteries of Udolpho. By Ann Radcliffe. Ed. Bonamy Dobrée. Oxford and London: Oxofrd UP, 1998. vii-xxvii.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. Explanatory Note. The Mysteries of Udolpho. By Ann Radcliffe. Ed. Bonamy Dobrée. Oxford and London: Oxofrd UP, 1998. 677.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Critical Review 11 (1794) : 361-72.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Conger, Syndy MacMillen. Mary Wollstonecraft and the Language of Sensibility. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cox, Stephen. “Sensibility as Argument.” Sensibility in Transformation: Creativezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics. Ed. Syndy McMillen Conger. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1990. 63-82.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Drabble, Margaret, and Jenny Stringer, eds. Oxford Concise Companion to English Literature. Oxford and New York: Oxford UP, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dyer, A. V. George. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Analytical Review 19 (1794) : 140-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ellis, Kate Ferguson. “Kidnapped Romance in Ann Radcliffe.” The Contested Castle. Urbana and Chicago: Illinois UP, 1989. 99-128.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Enfield, William. “The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Monthly Review 15 (1794) : 278-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Epstein, Heller Lynne. “Mrs. Radcliffe’s Landscapes: The Influence of Three Landscape Painters on her Nature Descriptions.” Hatrford Studies in Literature 1 (1969) : 107-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gatens, Moria. “ ‘The Oppressed State of my Sex’: Mary Wollstonecraft on Reason, Feeling and Equality.” Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. Ed. Mary Lyndon Shanley and Carole Pateman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 112-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. Feminism and Philosophy: Perspective on Difference and Equality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 9-27.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Genovese, Elizabeth Fox. Feminism Without Illusions: A Critique of Individualism. Chapel Hill: North Carolina UP, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Graham, Kenneth W. “Emily’s Demon-Lover: The Gothic Revolution and Thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mysteries of Udolpho.” Gothic Fictions: Prohibition/Transgression. New York: AMS Press, 1989. 163-71zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grimshaw, Jean. “Mary Wollstonecraft and the Tensions in Feminist Philosophy.” Socialism, Feminism and Philosophy: A Radical Philosophy Reader. Ed. Sean Sayers and Peter Osborne. London and New York: Routledge. 9-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gray, Martin. A Dictionary of Literary Terms. London: Longman, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hume, David. Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. L A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Claredon Press, 1996. 231.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Inchbald, Elizabeth. A Simple Story. Ed. J. M. S. Tompkins London: Oxford, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jacobus, Mary. “‘The Science of Herself’: Scenes of Female Enlightenment.” Romanticism, History, and the Possibilities of Gender: Re-forming Literature 1789-1837. Ed. Tilottama Rajan and Julia M. Wright. New York and London: Cambridge UP, 1998. 241-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Johnson, Claudia L. Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender and Sentimentality in the 1790s Wollstonecraft, Radcliffe, Burney, Austen. Chicago: Chicago UP, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, Vivien, ed. Women in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jump. Harriet Devine. Mary Wollstonecraft: Writer. London and New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kavanaugh, Julia. “Mr. Radcliffe.” English Women of Letters: Biographical Sketches. London: 1863. 235-52.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kelly, Gray. “Women Novelist and the French Revolution Debate: Novelizing thezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Revolution/Revolutionizing the Novel.” Eighteenth-Century Fiction 6.4 (1994) : 369-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. English Fiction of the Romantic Period 1789-1830. London: Longman, 1989. 1-69.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lange, Lynda. “Rousseau and Modern Feminism.” Feminist Interpretations and Political Theory. Ed. Mary London Shanley and Carol Pateman. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991. 95-111.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lewis, Matthew G. The Life and Correspondence of M. G. Lewis I (1839) : 122-24.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) London, April. “Ann Radcliffe in Context: Making the Boundaries of The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Eighteenth-Century Life 10 (1979) : 34-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mackenize, Catriona. “Reason and Sensibility: The Idea of Women’s Self-Governance in the Writings of Mary Wollstonecraft.” Hypatia 8 (1993) : 35-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miles, Robert. Ann Radcliffe: The Great Enchantress. Manchester and New York: Manchester UP, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Milton, John. Paradise Lost and Paradise Regained. New York and London: Signet, 1968.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Myers, Mitzi. “Sensibility and the ‘Walk of Reason’: Mary Wollstonecraft’s Literary Reviews as Cultural Critique.” Sensibility in Transformation: Creative Resistance to Sentiment from the Augustans to the Romantics. Ed. Syndy McMillen Conger. London and Toronto: Associated UP, 1990. 121-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Poovey, Mary. “Ideology and The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Criticism. 21.4 (1979) : 307-331.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pope, Alexander. An Essay on Men. Ed. Wolfgang Breidert. Hamburg: Meiner, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Radcliffe, Ann. The Mysteries of Udolpho. Ed. Bonamy Dobrée. Oxford and London: Oxford UP, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. “On the Supernatural in Poetry.” New Monthly Magazine 16 (1826) : 145-52.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reeve, Clara. The Old English Baron: A Gothic Story. Ed. James Trainer. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rogers, Deborah D., ed. The Critical Response to Ann Radcliffe. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rousseau, Jean Jacques. Émile. Trans. Barbara Foxley. London and New York: Everyman, 1957.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sambrook, James. The Eighteenth Century: The Intellectual and Cultural Context of Engligh Literature 1700-1789. New York: Longman, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shaftesbury, Anthony. “Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times.” Ed. Benjamin Rand. The Life, Unpublished Letters, and Philosophical Regimen of Anthony, Earl of Shaftesbury. London: Swan Sonnenschein, 1900. 403.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Skinner, Gillian. Sensibility and Economics in the Novel, 1740-1800. New York: Macmillan, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Spacks, Patricia Meyer. “Fathers and Daughters: Ann Radcliffe.” Desire and Truth. Chicago and London: Chicago UP, 1990. 147-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stoler, John Andrew. Ann Radcliffe: The Novel of Suspense and Terror. New York: Arno Press, 1980zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Todd, Janet, Sensibility. London and New York: Methuen, 1986zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. “‘The Great Enchantress’: Ann Radcliffe.” The Sign of Angellica: Women, Writing and Fiction 1660-1880. New York: Columbia UP, 1989. 253-72.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tompkins, J. M. S. The Popular Novel in England 1770-1800. Lincoln: Nebraska UP, 1961.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Varma, Devendra. P. The Gothic Flame. New York: Russell and Russell, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Voller, Jack G. The Supernatural Sublime. Northern: Illinois UP, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wang, Orrin N. C. “The Other Reasons: Female Alternative and Enlightenment Discourse in Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.” The Yale Journal of Criticism 5 (1991) : 129-49.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wardle, Ralph M. “The Intellectual and Historical Background of A Vindication of the Rights of Woman.” A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. Carol H. Poston. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1975. 202-07.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Whiting, Patricia. “Literal and Literary Representation of the Family in The Mysteries of Udolpho.” Eighteenth Century Fiction 8.4 (1996) : 485-501.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Ed. Carol H. Poston. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company, 1975.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. “A Vindication of the Rights of Men.” Ed. Janet Todd. A Wollstonecraft Anthology. UK: Polity Press, 1977. 64-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) ---. “Thoughts on the Education of Daughters.” Ed. Vivien Jones. Women in the Eighteenth Century. London: Routledge, 1990. 110-11.zh_TW