1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 學術產出
  3. College of Liberal Arts
  4. Theses
  5. Item

學術產出-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

政大圖書館

Citation Infomation

  • No doi shows Citation Infomation
題名 龍樹《迴諍論》之譯註與研究
作者 羅尉慈
貢獻者 林鎮國
羅尉慈
關鍵詞 龍樹
迴諍論
正理經
量
五支分
一切法空
日期 2003
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 16:48:05 (UTC+8)
摘要 《迴諍論》(Vigrahavyāvartanī)是龍樹除了《中論》(Mūlamadhyamakakārikā)以外，最為人所熟知、也最為學界所重視的代表作品之一。在《迴諍論》中，龍樹對於身分疑為正理學派的敵論者，由知識論作為切入點，質疑其「一切法空」的主張，有著相當精采且尖銳的答辯。藉由此種論難與反詰的對話形式，龍樹清楚地闡明自己強烈反對實在論式知識論的理據何在，同時亦連帶呈現了中觀學式的語言觀，並再次澄清「一切法空」的真義，及其在倫理學與宗教實踐等價值論上的增益和積極性。
《迴諍論》原先僅有漢、藏兩種語言的譯本，梵文原典則已逸失多年，直至西元1936才在西藏發掘面世，隨後並有多名國外學者陸續投身梵本的校對和翻譯工作，但在此一系列的研究工作中，新的中文譯本始終付之闕如，現存可見之《迴諍論》漢本主要仍是譯於西元541年的版本。該漢本咸認艱深難解，除了譯者行文晦澀之外，蓋因論中多處關涉正理學派的哲學觀點及術語(如「四量」、「五支分」，或種種的「誤難」等)，顯然已預設讀者應熟稔於當時印度哲學的諍論傳統。本篇論文既以《迴諍論》為研究素材，主要內容即為參照古典漢本與藏本，以白話中文重新對譯梵本，以方便中文讀者把握梵本文意。其次，本篇論文亦重建了龍樹與其敵對學派的對話脈絡，透過對《正理經》(Nyāyasūtra) ――尤其是卷一與卷五――的大量徵引與解釋，指出其與《迴諍論》的對應性，這對了解敵論者的哲學立場有相當程度的幫助。而《迴諍論》中最富爭議性的段落――第二十九頌的「我宗無」、第三十頌的「不取少法轉迴」、第六十三頌的「我不遮」；本篇論文除整理列舉出近年來學界對此相關的各種研究成果之外，也提出了個人的詮釋看法。
參考文獻 原始文獻
中文
後魏三藏毘目智仙、瞿曇流支 譯《迴諍論》，《大正藏》冊32，No.1631。
任杰 藏本譯漢「回諍論頌」，錄於《龍樹六論》，北京：民族出版社，2000。
梵志青目 釋，姚秦三藏鳩摩羅什 譯《中論》，錄自《藏要》第一輯第十五種，台北：新文豐，1988。
劉宋三藏求那跋陀羅 譯《雜阿含經》，大正藏卷2，No.99。
外文
Bhattacharya, K., The Dialectical Method of Nāgārjuna. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2002.
Jhā,G., The Nyāyasūtras of Gautama. With Vātsyāyana’s Bhāṣya and Uddyotakara’s Vārttika. Kyoto: Rinsen Book, 1983.
Kalupahana, D. J., Nāgārjuna. The Philosophy of the Middle Way. New York: State University of New York Press, 1986.
Lindtner, Ch., Nagarjuniana.Studies in the Writings and Philosophy of Nāgārjuna. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1987.
Streng, F. J., Emptiness. A Study in Religious Meaning. Nashville and New York: Abingdon Press, 1967.
Tucci, G.., Pre-Diṅnāga Buddhist Texts on Logic from Chinese Sources. Madras: Vesta Publications, 1981.
Vidyābhuṣana, S. Ch., The Nyāya Sūtras of Gotama. Allahabad: Sudhindra Natha Vasu at the Panini Office, 1913.
Wood, T. E., Nāgārjunian Disputations: A Philosophical Journey through an Indian Looking-Glass. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications, 1995.
Yamaguchi, S., Traité de Nāgārjuna, Pour Écarter les Vaines Discussions. 錄於《山口益佛教學文集》上冊，東京：春秋社，1972。
相關研究
中文
A. K. Warder著，王世安 譯，《印度佛教史》，台北：華宇，1987。
印順，《說一切有部為主的論書與論師之研究》，新竹：正聞，民81。
印順，《中觀論頌講記》，新竹：正聞，民87。
印順，《空之探究》，新竹：正聞，民89。
T˜ran˜tha著，沂暖 譯，《印度佛教史》，台北：佛教，民67。
C. Datta著，伍先林 等譯，《印度哲學概論》，台北：黎明，民82。
Th. Stcherbatsky著，宋立道、舒曉烽 譯，《佛教邏輯》，北京：商務，1997。
沈劍英，《因明學研究》，台南：智者，民83。
梶山雄一 等著，李世傑 譯，《中觀思想》，台北：華宇，民74。
D.M. Datta、S.C. Chatteyee著，李志夫 譯，《印度哲學導論》，台北：幼獅，民63。
吳汝鈞 編，《佛學研究方法論》，台北：學生，民72。
梶山雄一 著，吳汝鈞 譯，《印度中觀哲學》，台北：圓明，民82。
金克木，《梵佛探》，南昌：江西教育出版社，1999。
林鎮國，《空性與現代性》，台北：立緒，民88。
S. Dasgupta著，林煌洲 譯，《印度哲學史》，台北：國立編譯館，民85。
平川彰 著，莊崑木 譯，《印度佛教史》，台北：商周，2002。
瓜生津隆真 等著，許洋主 等譯，《中觀與空義》，台北：華宇。
R. H. Robinson著，郭忠生 譯，《印度與中國早期的中觀學派》，南投：正觀，民85。
T. R. V. Murti著，郭忠生 譯，《中觀哲學》，台北：華宇，民73。
Bu-ston 著，郭和卿 譯，《布頓佛教史》，台北：華宇，民77。
中村元 編，葉阿月 譯，《印度思想》，台北：幼獅，民73。
湯用彤《印度哲學史略》，台北：佛光，民90。
萬金川，「關於迴諍論的一些歷史考察以及當代的若干研究」(一)、(二)、(三)、(四)，載於《中國佛教》第27卷第6─9期。
萬金川，《詞義之爭與義理之辨》，南投：正觀，民87。
萬金川，《中觀思想講錄》，嘉義：香光書鄉，1998。
梶山雄一 等著，張春波 等譯，《印度邏輯學論集》，台北：華宇。
張曼濤 編，現代佛教學術叢刊冊21《佛教邏輯與辯証法》，台北：大乘，民67。
張曼濤 編，現代佛教學術叢刊冊42《佛教邏輯之發展》，台北：大乘，民67。
張曼濤 編，現代佛教學術叢刊冊46《中觀思想論集》，台北：大乘，民67。
張曼濤 編，現代佛教學術叢刊冊95《部派佛教與阿毗達磨》，台北：大乘，民67。
楊惠南，《龍樹與中觀哲學》，台北：東大圖書，民77。
楊惠南，《印度哲學史》，台北：東大，民84。
木村泰賢 著，歐陽瀚存 譯，《原始佛教思想論》，台北：台灣商務，民82。
梶山雄一 著，蕭平、楊金萍 譯，「佛教知識論的形成」，載於《普門學報》第15─17期。
外文
Arnold, D.
2001 ‘How to Do Things with Candrakīrti: A Comparative Study in Anti-skepticism’, Philosophy East and West, v.51. n.2.
Basso, Pierre
1988 ‘Language for a Causal Conditional Logic Foundations and Objectives’, Journal of Indian Philosophy, v.16.
Betty, L. S.
1983 ‘Nāgārjuna’s Masterpiece―Logic, Mystical, Both or Neither?’, in Philosophy East and West, v.33. n.2.
Bhattacharya, Kamaleswar
1974 ‘A Note on the Interpretation of the Term S˜dhyasama in Madhyamaka Texts’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.
1977 ‘On the Relationship between the Vigrahavyāvartanī and the Nyāyasūtras’, in Journal of Indo-European Studies, v.5. n.2.
1978 ‘Some Notes on Vigrahavyāvartanī’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 5.
Bhikkhu Bodhi
1999 A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma. Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.
Cabezón, J. I.
1994 Buddhism and Language. New York: State University of New York.
Chimpa, L. et Chattopadhyaya, A.
1997 T˜ran˜tha’s History of Buddhism in India. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Coward, H. G.
1976 ”Language” in Indian Philosophy and Religion. Quebec: Canadian Society for the Study of Religion.
David, B.
1999 Emptiness Appraised. A Critical Study of Nāgārjuna’s Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Eckel, D. Malcolm.
1978 ‘Bh˜vaviveka and the Early M˜dhyamika Theories of Language’, in Philosophy East and West v.28. n.3.
Gangopadhyay, M. K.
1984 Indian Logic in its Sources. On Validity of Inference. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
Gudmunsen, C.
1977 Wittgenstein and Buddhism. London: Macmillan.
Guenther, H. V.
1957 Philosophy and Psychology in the Abidharma. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Hayes, R. P.
1994 ‘Nāgārjuna’s Appeal’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 22.
Huntington, C. W.
1992 The Emptiness of Emptiness. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Jayatilleke, K. N.
1963 Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
John Vattanky, S. J.
1995 Nyāya Philosophy of Language. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
Kawamura, L. S.
1991 Mādhyamika and Yogācāra. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
Keenan, J. P.
1989 The Foundational Standpoint of Mādhyamika Philosophy by Gadjin Nagao. Delhi：Sri Satguru Publictions.
Mabbet, Ian
1996 ‘Is There Devadatta in the House? Nāgārjuna’s Vigrahavyāvartanī and the Liar Paradox’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 24, 3.
Matilal, B. K.
1968 The Navya-Nyāya Doctrine of Negation. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
1970 ‘Reference and Existence in Ny˜ya and Buddhist Logic’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 1.
1974 ‘A Note on the Nyāya Fallacy Sādhyasamaand Petitio Principii’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.
1985 Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
1986 Buddhsit Logic and Epistemology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
1998 The Character of Logic in India. New York: State University of New York.
2001 The Word and the World. New York: Oxford University Press.
McCagney, N.
1997 Nāgārjuna and the Philosophy of Openness. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Miþra, G.
1990 Language, Reality, and Analysis. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Mohanty, J. N.
1992 Reason and Tradition in Indian Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Murti, T. R. V.
1960 The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. London: George Allen & Unwin Pub.
1974 ‘Some Comments on the Philosophy of Language in the Indian Context’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.
Obermiller, E.
1986 The History of Buddhism in India and Tibet by Bu Ston. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
Oliver, C. F.
1978 ‘Perception in Early Nyāya’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 6.
Patel, K. C.
1994 ‘The Paradox of Negation in Nagarjuna’s Philosophy’, in Asian Philosophy Vol.4.
Phillips, S. H.
1997 Classical Indian Metaphysics. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Potter, K. H.
1977 Indain Metaphysics and Epistemology: the Tradition of Nyaya-Vaisesika up to Gangesa. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Puhakka, K.
1975 Knowledge and Reality. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Randle, H. N.
1976 Indian Logic in the Early Schools. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corporations.
Robinson, R.H.
1976 Early Mādhyamika in Indian and China. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Shastri, Dh. N.
1976 The Philosophy of Nyāya-Vaiśesika and its Conflict with the Buddhist Dignāga Scool. New Delhi: Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan.
Shaw , J. L.
1974 ‘Empty Terms: The Nyāya and the Buddhists’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.
1978 ‘Negation and the Buddhist Theory of Meaning’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy v.6.
Siderits, M.
1980 ‘Madhyamaka Critique of Epistemology’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy v.8.
1988 ‘Nāgārjuna as Anti-Realist’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy v.16.
1991 Indian Philosophy of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Staal, J. F.
1973 ‘The Concept of Pakṣa in Indian Logic’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.
Stcherbatsky, Th.
1994 The Central Conception of Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
1999 The Conception of Buddhist Nirvāṇa. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
2000 Buddhist Logic. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Tachikawa, M.
1997 An Introduction to the Philosophy of Nāgārjuna. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Vidyābhuṣana, M. S. Ch.
1921 A History of Indian Logic. Calcutta: Calcutta University.
Waldo, Ives
1978 ‘Nagarjuna and Analytic Philosophy’, in Philosophy East andWest. v.28 n.3.
Wagle, N. K.
1993 Studies on Buddhism in Honour of Professor A.K. Warder. Columbia: South Asia Books.
Warder, A.K.
2000 Indian Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
工具書
中文
釋惠敏、釋齎因 編譯《梵語初階》，台北：法鼓，1996。
羅世芳、巫白慧 編著《梵語詩文圖解》，北京：商務，2001。
(東漢)許慎 著，(清)段玉 裁注《圈點段注說文解字》，台北：萬卷樓，民91。
外文
Apte, V.S., The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Kyoto: Risem Book, 1998.
Edgerton, F., Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1998.
Goldman, R.P. et Sutherland, S.J., Devavāṇīpraveśikā―An Introduction to the Sanskrit Language. Berkeley: University of California, 1987.
Lanman, C.R., A Sanskrit Reader. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1996.
Macdonell, A.A., A Pratical Sanskrit Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.
Macdonell, A.A., A Sanskrit Grammar for Students. London: Oxford University Press, 1975.
Monier-Williams, M., Sanskrit-English Dictionary. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Pub., 1999.
Perry, E.D., A Sanskrit Primer. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1999.
Speijer, J. S., Sanskrit Syntax. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1998.
Whitney, W.D., Sanskrit Grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2000.
Whitney, W.D., The Roots, Verb-forms and Primary Derivatives of the Sanskrit Language. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2000.
荻原雲來，《梵和大辭典》，台北：新文豐，1979。
塚本啟祥、松長有慶、磯田熙文，《梵語佛典研究》冊三，京都：平樂寺書店。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
哲學研究所
89154006
92
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089154006
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 林鎮國zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 羅尉慈zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) 羅尉慈zh_TW
dc.date (日期) 2003en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 16:48:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 16:48:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 16:48:05 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0089154006en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33461-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 哲學研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 89154006zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 92zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 《迴諍論》(Vigrahavyāvartanī)是龍樹除了《中論》(Mūlamadhyamakakārikā)以外，最為人所熟知、也最為學界所重視的代表作品之一。在《迴諍論》中，龍樹對於身分疑為正理學派的敵論者，由知識論作為切入點，質疑其「一切法空」的主張，有著相當精采且尖銳的答辯。藉由此種論難與反詰的對話形式，龍樹清楚地闡明自己強烈反對實在論式知識論的理據何在，同時亦連帶呈現了中觀學式的語言觀，並再次澄清「一切法空」的真義，及其在倫理學與宗教實踐等價值論上的增益和積極性。
《迴諍論》原先僅有漢、藏兩種語言的譯本，梵文原典則已逸失多年，直至西元1936才在西藏發掘面世，隨後並有多名國外學者陸續投身梵本的校對和翻譯工作，但在此一系列的研究工作中，新的中文譯本始終付之闕如，現存可見之《迴諍論》漢本主要仍是譯於西元541年的版本。該漢本咸認艱深難解，除了譯者行文晦澀之外，蓋因論中多處關涉正理學派的哲學觀點及術語(如「四量」、「五支分」，或種種的「誤難」等)，顯然已預設讀者應熟稔於當時印度哲學的諍論傳統。本篇論文既以《迴諍論》為研究素材，主要內容即為參照古典漢本與藏本，以白話中文重新對譯梵本，以方便中文讀者把握梵本文意。其次，本篇論文亦重建了龍樹與其敵對學派的對話脈絡，透過對《正理經》(Nyāyasūtra) ――尤其是卷一與卷五――的大量徵引與解釋，指出其與《迴諍論》的對應性，這對了解敵論者的哲學立場有相當程度的幫助。而《迴諍論》中最富爭議性的段落――第二十九頌的「我宗無」、第三十頌的「不取少法轉迴」、第六十三頌的「我不遮」；本篇論文除整理列舉出近年來學界對此相關的各種研究成果之外，也提出了個人的詮釋看法。		zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一部分 導論
第一節 研究之回顧……………………………………3
第二節 論爭之背景……………………………………6
第三節 主要論題………………………………………16

第二部分 《迴諍論》梵漢原典對照譯註
Vigrahavyāvartanī……………………………………29

附錄
參考書目………………………………………………161		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 43877 bytes-
dc.format.extent 129197 bytes-
dc.format.extent 75775 bytes-
dc.format.extent 716635 bytes-
dc.format.extent 1246297 bytes-
dc.format.extent 273894 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0089154006en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 龍樹zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 迴諍論zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 正理經zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 量zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 五支分zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 一切法空zh_TW
dc.title (題名) 龍樹《迴諍論》之譯註與研究zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 原始文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 後魏三藏毘目智仙、瞿曇流支 譯《迴諍論》，《大正藏》冊32，No.1631。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 任杰 藏本譯漢「回諍論頌」，錄於《龍樹六論》，北京：民族出版社，2000。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梵志青目 釋，姚秦三藏鳩摩羅什 譯《中論》，錄自《藏要》第一輯第十五種，台北：新文豐，1988。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 劉宋三藏求那跋陀羅 譯《雜阿含經》，大正藏卷2，No.99。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 外文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhattacharya, K., The Dialectical Method of Nāgārjuna. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jhā,G., The Nyāyasūtras of Gautama. With Vātsyāyana’s Bhāṣya and Uddyotakara’s Vārttika. Kyoto: Rinsen Book, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kalupahana, D. J., Nāgārjuna. The Philosophy of the Middle Way. New York: State University of New York Press, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lindtner, Ch., Nagarjuniana.Studies in the Writings and Philosophy of Nāgārjuna. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Streng, F. J., Emptiness. A Study in Religious Meaning. Nashville and New York: Abingdon Press, 1967.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tucci, G.., Pre-Diṅnāga Buddhist Texts on Logic from Chinese Sources. Madras: Vesta Publications, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vidyābhuṣana, S. Ch., The Nyāya Sūtras of Gotama. Allahabad: Sudhindra Natha Vasu at the Panini Office, 1913.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wood, T. E., Nāgārjunian Disputations: A Philosophical Journey through an Indian Looking-Glass. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Yamaguchi, S., Traité de Nāgārjuna, Pour Écarter les Vaines Discussions. 錄於《山口益佛教學文集》上冊，東京：春秋社，1972。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 相關研究zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) A. K. Warder著，王世安 譯，《印度佛教史》，台北：華宇，1987。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 印順，《說一切有部為主的論書與論師之研究》，新竹：正聞，民81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 印順，《中觀論頌講記》，新竹：正聞，民87。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 印順，《空之探究》，新竹：正聞，民89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) T˜ran˜tha著，沂暖 譯，《印度佛教史》，台北：佛教，民67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) C. Datta著，伍先林 等譯，《印度哲學概論》，台北：黎明，民82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Th. Stcherbatsky著，宋立道、舒曉烽 譯，《佛教邏輯》，北京：商務，1997。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 沈劍英，《因明學研究》，台南：智者，民83。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梶山雄一 等著，李世傑 譯，《中觀思想》，台北：華宇，民74。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) D.M. Datta、S.C. Chatteyee著，李志夫 譯，《印度哲學導論》，台北：幼獅，民63。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 吳汝鈞 編，《佛學研究方法論》，台北：學生，民72。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梶山雄一 著，吳汝鈞 譯，《印度中觀哲學》，台北：圓明，民82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 金克木，《梵佛探》，南昌：江西教育出版社，1999。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林鎮國，《空性與現代性》，台北：立緒，民88。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) S. Dasgupta著，林煌洲 譯，《印度哲學史》，台北：國立編譯館，民85。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 平川彰 著，莊崑木 譯，《印度佛教史》，台北：商周，2002。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 瓜生津隆真 等著，許洋主 等譯，《中觀與空義》，台北：華宇。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) R. H. Robinson著，郭忠生 譯，《印度與中國早期的中觀學派》，南投：正觀，民85。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) T. R. V. Murti著，郭忠生 譯，《中觀哲學》，台北：華宇，民73。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bu-ston 著，郭和卿 譯，《布頓佛教史》，台北：華宇，民77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中村元 編，葉阿月 譯，《印度思想》，台北：幼獅，民73。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 湯用彤《印度哲學史略》，台北：佛光，民90。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 萬金川，「關於迴諍論的一些歷史考察以及當代的若干研究」(一)、(二)、(三)、(四)，載於《中國佛教》第27卷第6─9期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 萬金川，《詞義之爭與義理之辨》，南投：正觀，民87。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 萬金川，《中觀思想講錄》，嘉義：香光書鄉，1998。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梶山雄一 等著，張春波 等譯，《印度邏輯學論集》，台北：華宇。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張曼濤 編，現代佛教學術叢刊冊21《佛教邏輯與辯証法》，台北：大乘，民67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張曼濤 編，現代佛教學術叢刊冊42《佛教邏輯之發展》，台北：大乘，民67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張曼濤 編，現代佛教學術叢刊冊46《中觀思想論集》，台北：大乘，民67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 張曼濤 編，現代佛教學術叢刊冊95《部派佛教與阿毗達磨》，台北：大乘，民67。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊惠南，《龍樹與中觀哲學》，台北：東大圖書，民77。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊惠南，《印度哲學史》，台北：東大，民84。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 木村泰賢 著，歐陽瀚存 譯，《原始佛教思想論》，台北：台灣商務，民82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 梶山雄一 著，蕭平、楊金萍 譯，「佛教知識論的形成」，載於《普門學報》第15─17期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 外文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Arnold, D.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001 ‘How to Do Things with Candrakīrti: A Comparative Study in Anti-skepticism’, Philosophy East and West, v.51. n.2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Basso, Pierrezh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1988 ‘Language for a Causal Conditional Logic Foundations and Objectives’, Journal of Indian Philosophy, v.16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Betty, L. S.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1983 ‘Nāgārjuna’s Masterpiece―Logic, Mystical, Both or Neither?’, in Philosophy East and West, v.33. n.2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhattacharya, Kamaleswarzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1974 ‘A Note on the Interpretation of the Term S˜dhyasama in Madhyamaka Texts’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1977 ‘On the Relationship between the Vigrahavyāvartanī and the Nyāyasūtras’, in Journal of Indo-European Studies, v.5. n.2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1978 ‘Some Notes on Vigrahavyāvartanī’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 5.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bhikkhu Bodhizh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 A Comprehensive Manual of Abhidhamma. Sri Lanka: Buddhist Publication Society.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cabezón, J. I.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1994 Buddhism and Language. New York: State University of New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chimpa, L. et Chattopadhyaya, A.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1997 T˜ran˜tha’s History of Buddhism in India. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Coward, H. G.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1976 ”Language” in Indian Philosophy and Religion. Quebec: Canadian Society for the Study of Religion.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) David, B.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 Emptiness Appraised. A Critical Study of Nāgārjuna’s Philosophy. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Eckel, D. Malcolm.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1978 ‘Bh˜vaviveka and the Early M˜dhyamika Theories of Language’, in Philosophy East and West v.28. n.3.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gangopadhyay, M. K.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1984 Indian Logic in its Sources. On Validity of Inference. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Gudmunsen, C.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1977 Wittgenstein and Buddhism. London: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guenther, H. V.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1957 Philosophy and Psychology in the Abidharma. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hayes, R. P.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1994 ‘Nāgārjuna’s Appeal’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 22.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Huntington, C. W.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1992 The Emptiness of Emptiness. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jayatilleke, K. N.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1963 Early Buddhist Theory of Knowledge. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) John Vattanky, S. J.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995 Nyāya Philosophy of Language. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kawamura, L. S.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1991 Mādhyamika and Yogācāra. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keenan, J. P.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1989 The Foundational Standpoint of Mādhyamika Philosophy by Gadjin Nagao. Delhi：Sri Satguru Publictions.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mabbet, Ianzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1996 ‘Is There Devadatta in the House? Nāgārjuna’s Vigrahavyāvartanī and the Liar Paradox’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 24, 3.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Matilal, B. K.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1968 The Navya-Nyāya Doctrine of Negation. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1970 ‘Reference and Existence in Ny˜ya and Buddhist Logic’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1974 ‘A Note on the Nyāya Fallacy Sādhyasamaand Petitio Principii’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1985 Analytical Philosophy in Comparative Perspective. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1986 Buddhsit Logic and Epistemology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Perception: An Essay on Classical Indian Theories of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1998 The Character of Logic in India. New York: State University of New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2001 The Word and the World. New York: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) McCagney, N.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1997 Nāgārjuna and the Philosophy of Openness. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miþra, G.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1990 Language, Reality, and Analysis. Leiden: E. J. Brill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mohanty, J. N.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1992 Reason and Tradition in Indian Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Murti, T. R. V.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1960 The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. London: George Allen & Unwin Pub.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1974 ‘Some Comments on the Philosophy of Language in the Indian Context’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Obermiller, E.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1986 The History of Buddhism in India and Tibet by Bu Ston. Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oliver, C. F.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1978 ‘Perception in Early Nyāya’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 6.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Patel, K. C.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1994 ‘The Paradox of Negation in Nagarjuna’s Philosophy’, in Asian Philosophy Vol.4.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Phillips, S. H.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1997 Classical Indian Metaphysics. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Potter, K. H.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1977 Indain Metaphysics and Epistemology: the Tradition of Nyaya-Vaisesika up to Gangesa. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Puhakka, K.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1975 Knowledge and Reality. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Randle, H. N.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1976 Indian Logic in the Early Schools. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corporations.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Robinson, R.H.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1976 Early Mādhyamika in Indian and China. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shastri, Dh. N.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1976 The Philosophy of Nyāya-Vaiśesika and its Conflict with the Buddhist Dignāga Scool. New Delhi: Bharatiya Vidya Prakashan.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shaw , J. L.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1974 ‘Empty Terms: The Nyāya and the Buddhists’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1978 ‘Negation and the Buddhist Theory of Meaning’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy v.6.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Siderits, M.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1980 ‘Madhyamaka Critique of Epistemology’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy v.8.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1988 ‘Nāgārjuna as Anti-Realist’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy v.16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1991 Indian Philosophy of Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Staal, J. F.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1973 ‘The Concept of Pakṣa in Indian Logic’, in Journal of Indian Philosophy 2.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Stcherbatsky, Th.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1994 The Central Conception of Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1999 The Conception of Buddhist Nirvāṇa. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2000 Buddhist Logic. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Tachikawa, M.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1997 An Introduction to the Philosophy of Nāgārjuna. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vidyābhuṣana, M. S. Ch.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1921 A History of Indian Logic. Calcutta: Calcutta University.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waldo, Iveszh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1978 ‘Nagarjuna and Analytic Philosophy’, in Philosophy East andWest. v.28 n.3.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wagle, N. K.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1993 Studies on Buddhism in Honour of Professor A.K. Warder. Columbia: South Asia Books.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Warder, A.K.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 2000 Indian Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 工具書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 中文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 釋惠敏、釋齎因 編譯《梵語初階》，台北：法鼓，1996。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 羅世芳、巫白慧 編著《梵語詩文圖解》，北京：商務，2001。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (東漢)許慎 著，(清)段玉 裁注《圈點段注說文解字》，台北：萬卷樓，民91。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 外文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Apte, V.S., The Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionary. Kyoto: Risem Book, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edgerton, F., Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit Grammar and Dictionary. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Goldman, R.P. et Sutherland, S.J., Devavāṇīpraveśikā―An Introduction to the Sanskrit Language. Berkeley: University of California, 1987.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lanman, C.R., A Sanskrit Reader. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Macdonell, A.A., A Pratical Sanskrit Dictionary. London: Oxford University Press, 1965.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Macdonell, A.A., A Sanskrit Grammar for Students. London: Oxford University Press, 1975.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Monier-Williams, M., Sanskrit-English Dictionary. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Pub., 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Perry, E.D., A Sanskrit Primer. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Speijer, J. S., Sanskrit Syntax. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Whitney, W.D., Sanskrit Grammar. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Whitney, W.D., The Roots, Verb-forms and Primary Derivatives of the Sanskrit Language. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 荻原雲來，《梵和大辭典》，台北：新文豐，1979。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 塚本啟祥、松長有慶、磯田熙文，《梵語佛典研究》冊三，京都：平樂寺書店。zh_TW