| dc.contributor.advisor | 林從一 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Lin, Chung-I | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 鄭會穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Cheng, Huei-Ying | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 鄭會穎 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Cheng, Huei-Ying | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2007 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 16:48:38 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 16:48:38 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 16:48:38 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0093154001 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33465 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 93154001 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 96 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 這篇哲學論文是對約翰．麥克道爾(John McDowell)對「主體性」(subjectivity)看法的一個探究。這個計畫由兩部分所組成。一方面，我將討論麥克道爾如何理解並回應他所處理的諸多議題；另一方面，我將藉由考慮主體性的不同面向來進行相關的討論：一個主體是一個存在世界中的知覺者、知識者、思想者、說話者、行動者、具人格者(person)、以及(自我)意識者。我藉由指出並消解一個出自於「理性動物」這個概念的緊張關係來開始這個探究：人類是自然的，卻也同時是理性的。稍後這個探究藉由考慮麥克道爾的「第二自然∕天性」(second nature)概念如何使我們成為具有多重面貌的人類主體來推進。透過細究麥克道爾的診斷與回應，現代與當代哲學中的兩個中心錯誤–狹窄的自然觀以及「笛卡兒式的內在空間」(Cartesian inner space)–將被指出並且拒斥。 在導論章裡我首先建議我們應該為某個對「世界」的看法留下空間。我進一步論證「心靈性」(mentality)具有許多面向，而了解這些面向便是去了解人類主體的多重面貌。在第一章裡，我解釋為了消解「理性動物」這個概念所產生的緊張關係，亞里斯多德(Aristotle)的「第二自然∕天性」概念如何被引進。其後我回應一些對這個策略的擔憂，包括萊特(Crispin Wright)及其它哲學家的批評。高達美(Hans-Georg Gadamer)的「世界∕環境」區分也被引介並關聯到麥克道爾的思想。第二章討論知覺與知識；麥克道爾的主要標的–笛卡兒式的內在空間–被引進並批評。我也對史卓(Barry Stroud)與布雷克本(Simon Blackburn)的相關立場進行評價。稍後我把心靈與世界(Mind and World)的主題和現有的脈絡關聯起來；具體來說，我討論麥克道爾對戴維森(Donald Davidson)與康德(Immanuel Kant)的引用與延伸。然後我討論一個常被提及的「觀念論」指控，以及布蘭登(Robert Brandom)的「殘餘笛卡兒主義」(residual Cartesianism)批評。第三章專注於庫律普基(Saul Kripke)的維根斯坦(Ludwig Wittgenstein)，指出在規則依循背後的一個主要論題是內在空間模型的一個版本，而且庫律普基的維根斯坦其實並不是真正的維根斯坦。我回應來自庫許(Martin Kusch)的許多批評；達美特(Michael Dummett)對化約論的要求也被駁斥。其後，我考慮戴維森的「無語言」宣稱，並討論麥克道爾在多大的程度上同意他。第四章我衡量來自德雷弗斯(Hubert Dreyfus)關於行動和行動者的批評。我討論麥克道爾如何論證德雷弗斯與梅洛龐蒂(Maurice Merleau-Ponty)都犯了「無身體的智性主體迷思」(the Myth of the Disembodied Intellect)。討論當中也回應了艾爾斯(Michael Ayers)的智性主義指控。其後我引入麥克道爾對帕菲特(Derek Parfit)人格看法、以及對戴維森對心物關聯說法的批評。在第五章我專注於意識和自我意識。麥克道爾將他對帕菲特的論證應用在康德身上，但基尼斯弗(Maximilian de Gaynesford)認為麥克道爾誤讀了康德。我為麥克道爾回應這些批評。我進一步把這個討論關聯到麥克道爾對「概念架構–內容二元論」(scheme-content dualism)的攻擊。這把我們帶領到麥克道爾式看法對「感質」(qualia)的拒斥，並進一步到錯覺論證脈絡下「意向主義」(intentionalism)和「選言主義」(disjunctivism)的爭論。我批評克瑞(Tim Crane)設想意向主義以及錯覺論證的方式。我也討論了許多版本的選言主義。在結論章裡，我表達了對麥克道爾「自我決定主體性」(self-determining subjectivity)這個概念的疑慮。根據麥克道爾，人類的自由為「理由空間中的因果關係」(causations in the space of reasons)所構成，但如同賈斯金(Richard Gaskin)所指出，對它的一個完整說明尚未被提供。我以一些關於要如何填滿這個麥克道爾式圖像的約略想法來作結。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This essay is an inquiry into John McDowell’s thinking on ‘subjectivity.’ The project consists in two parts. On the one hand, I will discuss how McDowell understands and responds to the various issues he is tackling; on the other, I will approach relevant issues concerning subjectivity by considering different aspects of it: a subject as a perceiver, knower, thinker, speaker, agent, person and (self-) conscious being in the world. The inquiry begins by identifying and resolving a tension generated by the very idea of ‘rational animal’: human beings are at the same time natural and rational. Later the inquiry proceeds by considering how McDowell’s notion of ‘second nature’ enables us to be human subjects with many faces. By going through the diagnoses and responses of McDowell, two central problems in modern and contemporary philosophy – the narrow conception of nature and the Cartesian inner space model – are identified and repelled. In Episode N I first urge that we should leave room for a certain notion of ‘world.’ I further argue that mentality has many aspects, and to understand those aspects is to understand the many faces of human subject. In Episode Ⅰ the Aristotelian notion of ‘second nature’ is discussed in order to resolve the tension in the very idea of ‘rational animal.’ Later I reply to some worries about this maneuver, including the objection from Crispin Wright. Hans-Georg Gadamer’s distinction between world and environment is introduced and related to McDowell’s thinking. Episode Ⅱ discusses perception and knowledge; McDowell’s main target – the Cartesian inner space – is introduced and criticized. Barry Stroud’s and Simon Blackburn’s positions are evaluated. Later I connect the main theme of Mind and World to the present context; in particular, I discuss McDowell’s invocation of Donald Davidson and Immanuel Kant. And then I discuss a common accusation of idealism, and Robert Brandom’s accusation of ‘residual individualism.’ Episode Ⅲ concentrates on Saul Kripke’s Wittgenstein, arguing that the master thesis behind the rule-following paradox is a version of the inner space model, and that Kripke’s Wittgenstein is not Wittgenstein. Martin Kusch’s objections are answered; Michael Dummett’s demand of reductionism is rebutted. After this, I turn to Davidson’s ‘no language’ claim, and discuss to what extent McDowell agrees with him. In Episode Ⅳ I evaluate objections from Hubert Dreyfus concerning action and agency. I discuss how Dreyfus and Maurice Merleau-Ponty commit ‘the Myth of the Disembodied Intellect’ identified by McDowell. I answer Michael Ayer’s charge of intellectualism in passing. Later I bring in McDowell’s objections to Derek Parfit on personhood and to Davidson on the mind-body relation. In Episode Ⅴ I focus on consciousness and self-consciousness. McDowell applies his argument against Parfit to Kant, but Maximilian de Gaynesford dissents. I reply to his objections on McDowell’s behalf. I further connect this to McDowell’s attacks on the dualism of scheme and content. This leads to my McDowellian rejection to the existence of qualia, and further brings me to the debate between intentionalism and disjunctivism in the context of the argument from illusion. I argue against Tim Crane’s ways of conceiving issues about intentionalism and the argument from illusion. Varieties of disjunctivism are also discussed. In my Epilogue, I express my worry about McDowell’s notion of ‘self-determining subjectivity.’ According to McDowell, human freedom consists in causations in the space of reason, but as Richard Gaskin points out, a satisfying story of it is yet to be provided. I close this essay with some rough ideas about how to fill in the details of the McDowellian picture. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Preface (in Chinese)PrefaceAbstractAnalytical ContentsEpisode N. The Many Faces of Human Subject 1Episode Ⅰ. Cogito and Homo sapiens 10Episode Ⅱ. Perceiver and Knower 23Episode Ⅲ. Thinker and Speaker 47Episode Ⅳ. Agent and Person 72Episode Ⅴ. Apperceiver and Homo sentiens 98Epilogue. Self-Determining Subjectivity 126Bibliography 132 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 71000 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 207180 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 118632 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 200131 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 76395 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 119233 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 189829 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 181922 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 226478 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 214773 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 90895 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 123046 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093154001 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 主體性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 世界 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 自然 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 麥克道爾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Subjectivity | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | World | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | Nature | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | McDowell | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 世界與主體：麥克道爾哲學的幾個主題 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | World and Subject: Themes from McDowell | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Alweiss, Lilian. (2005) ‘The Myth of the Given,’ in János Boros (ed.), Mind in World, Brambauer Pécs, pp.39-65 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ayers, M. (2004) ‘Sense Experience, Concepts, and Content – Objections to Davidson and McDowell,’ in Ralph Schumacher (ed.), Perception and Reality: From Descartes to the Present, Paderborn, pp.239-62 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bartha, P. and Savitt, S. (1998) ‘Second-Guessing Second Nature,’ Analysis 58, pp.252-63 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bird, G. (1996) ‘McDowell’s Kant: Mind and World,’ Philosophy 71, pp.219-43 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Blackburn, S. (1981) ‘Rule-Following and Moral Realism,’ in Steven Holtzman and Christopher Leich (eds.) Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp.163-87 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Blackburn, S. (1983) Spreading the Word, Clarendon Press, Oxford | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Blackburn, S. (1984) ‘The Individual Strikes Back,’ Synthesis 58, pp.281-301 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Block, N. (2007a) ‘Mental Paint,’ in his Consciousness, Function, and Representation, MIT Press, pp. 533-70 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Block, N. (2007b) ‘Is Experiencing Just Representing?’ in Consciousness, Function, and Representation, pp.603-10 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brandom, R. (1994a) Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Harvard University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brandom, R. (1994b) ‘Perception and Rational Constraint,’ in Enrique Villanueva (ed.), Perception, Ridgeview Publishing Company, pp. 241-59 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brandom. R. (2002) Tales of the Mighty Dead Historical Essays in the Metaphysics of Intentionality, Harvard University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Brentano, F. (1973) Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint, Routledge and Kegan Paul | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Byrne, A. (2001) ‘Intentionalism Defended,’ The Philosophical Review 110, pp.199-240 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Byrne, A. and Logue, H. (2008) ‘Either / Or,’ in Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, pp.57-94 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chalmers, D. (2004) ‘The Representational Character of Experience,’ in Brian Leiter (ed.) The Future for Philosophy, Oxford University Press, pp. 153-81 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cheng, H-Y. (2006) ‘An Initial Defense of Semantic Primitivism,’ unpublished | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cheng, H-Y. (2007) ‘On Meaning Skeptics’ Cartesian Model,’ presented at Philosophy Graduate Conference of National Cheng-Chi University 10 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cheng, H-Y. (2008a) ‘Evaluating Williamson’s Anti-Skepticism,’ Sorites 21 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cheng, H-Y. (2008b) ‘Scheme-Content Dualism, Experience, and Self,’ presented at Philosophy Graduate Student Forum | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cheng, H-Y. (2008c) ‘Self, Action, and Passivity,’ under review | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cheng, H-Y. (2008d) ‘The Skeptical Paradox and the Nature of the Self,’ under review | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Cheng, H-Y. and Lin, C-I (2008) ‘Openness and the Social Initiation into the Space of Reasons,’ presented at Conference on Brandom’s Philosophy,’ March 2008 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Chisholm, R. (1942) Perceiving: A Philosophical Study, Cornell University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Collins, A. (1998) ‘Beastly Experience,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58, pp. 375-80 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crane, T. (2005) ‘The Problem of Perception,’ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/perception-problem/ | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crane, T. (2006) ‘Is There a Perceptual Relation?’ in Tamar Szabó Gendler and John Hawthorne (eds.) Perceptual Experience, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.126-46 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Crane, T. (forthcoming) ‘Intentionalism,’ in Ansgar Beckermann and Brian McLaughlin (eds.) Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind (forthcoming), Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | de Gaynesford, M. (2003) ‘Kant and Strawson on the Firs Person,’ in Hans-Johann Glock (ed.) Strawson and Kant, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.155-67 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | de Gaynesford, M. (2004a) John McDowell, Polity Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | de Gaynesford, M. (2004b) ‘On Referring to Oneself,’ Theoria 70, pp.121-61 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | deVries, W. and Triplett, T. (2000) Knowledge, Mind, and the Given: Reading Wilfrid Sellars’s ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dancy, J. (2006) ‘Acting in the Light of the Appearances,’ in C. MacDonald and G. MacDonald (eds.), McDowell and His Critics, pp. 121-34 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davidson, D. (1974) ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme,’ in Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47; reprinted in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation (2001), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.183-198 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davidson, D. (1983) ‘A Coherence Theory of Truth and Knowledge,’ in Kant oder Hegel? (1983); reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective (2001), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.137-153 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davidson, D. (1984) ‘Communication and Convention,’ Synthesis 59, pp.3-17; reprinted in his Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, pp.265-80 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davidson, D. (1986) ‘A Nice Derangement of Epitaphs,’ in Richard E. Grandy and Richard Warner (eds.) Philosophical Grounds of Rationality, Oxford University Press; reprinted in his Truth, Language, and History (2005), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.89-107 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davidson, D. (1988) ‘The Myth of the Subjective,’ in Michael Benedikt and Rudolf Berger (eds.) Bewusstein, Sprache und die Kunst, Edition S. Verlag der Österreichischen Staatsdruckerei; reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, pp.39-52 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davidson, D. (1991) ‘Three Varieties of Knowledge,’ in A. Phillips Griffiths (ed.) A. J. Ayer Memorial Essays: Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 30, Cambridge University Press; reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, pp.205-20 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davidson, D. (1992) ‘The Second Person,’ in Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy 17: The Wittgenstein Legacy, Indianapolis: University of Notre Dame Press; reprinted in his Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, pp.107-21 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davidson, D. (1994) ‘The Social Aspect of Language,’ in B. F. McGuinness and Gianluigi Oliveri (eds.) The Philosophy of Michael Dummett, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp.1-16; reprinted in his Truth, Language, and History, pp.109-25 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Davidson, D. (1999) ‘Reply to John McDowell,’ in Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.) The Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Open Court, , pp.105-08 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dennett, D. (1987) The Intentional Stance, MIT Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dennett, D. (1988) ‘Quining Qualia,’ in A. Marcel and E. Bisiach, (eds.), Consciousness in Modern Science, Oxford University Press; reprinted in David Chalmers (ed.) Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings, Oxford University Press, pp.226-46 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dingli, S. M. (2005) On Thinking and the World: John McDowell’s Mind and World, Ashgate Publishing | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dretske, F. (1995) Naturalizing the Mind, MIT Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dreyfus, H. (2001) ‘Todes’s Account of Nonconceptual Perceptual Knowledge and Its Relation to Thought,’ in Body and World, MIT Press, pp.xv-xxvii | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dreyfus, H. (2006) ‘Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers can Profit from the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise,’ in Topoi 25, pp.43-49; also http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~hdreyfus/pdf/Dreyfus%20APA%20Address%20%2010.22.05%20.pdf | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dreyfus, H. (2007a) ‘The Return of the Myth of the Mental,” Inquiry 50, pp.352-65 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dreyfus, H. (2007b) ‘Response to McDowell,’ Inquiry 50, pp.371-77 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ducasse, C. J. (1942) Moore’s Refutation of Idealism, ‘ in Arthur Schilpp (ed.) The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, Northwestern University Press, Chicago, pp.225-51 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dummett, M. (1981) ‘Frege and Wittgenstein,’ in Irving Block (ed.) Perspectives on the Philosophy of Wittgenstein, Blackwell, Oxford | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Dummett, M. (1989) ‘Language and Communication,’ in Alexander George (ed.) Reflections on Chomsky, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp.192-212 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Fodor, J. (1989) Psychosemantics: The Problem of Meaning in the Philosophy of Mind, MIT Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gadamer, H-G. (2004) Truth and Method, Continuum Publishing Group, (rev. trans.) Joel Weinsheimer and Donald Marshall | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gaskin, R. (2006) Experience and the World’s Own Language, Oxford University Press, USA | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gendler, T. S. and Hawthorne, J. ‘Introduction: Perceptual Experience,’ in Perceptual Experience, pp.1-30. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gibson, J. J. (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton Mifflin | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ginsborg, H. (2006) ‘Reasons for Belief,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72, pp.286-318 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Gupta, A. (2006) Empiricism and Experience, Oxford University Press, USA | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Haddock, A. and Macpherson, F. (2008) ‘Introduction: Varieties of Disjunctivism,’ their (eds.) Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, and Knowledge, Oxford University Press, pp. 1-24 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hornsby, J. (1980-1) ‘Which Physical Events are Mental Events?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81, pp.73-92; reprinted in her Simple Mindedness: in Defense of Naïve Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind (1997), Harvard University Press, pp.63-97 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Husserl, E. (2001) Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis: Lectures on Transcendental Logic, Springer | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Jackson, F. (2004) ‘Mind and Illusion,’ in Peter Ludlow, Yujin Nagasawa, and Daniel Stoljar (eds.) There is Something about Mary: Essays on Phenomenal Consciousness and Frank Jackson’s Knowledge Argument, MIT Press, pp.421-42 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Johansson, J. (2007) ‘What is Animalism?’ Ratio 20, pp.194-205 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kant, I. Critique of Pure Reason, Paul Guyer and Allen Wood (trans.), Cambridge University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kripke, S. (1982) Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Harvard University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Kusch, M. (2006) A Sceptical Guide to Meaning and Rules: Defending Kripke’s Wittgenstein, McGill-Queen’s University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leibniz, G. W. (1991) Monadology, Nicholas Rescher (trans.), London, Routledge | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Leibniz, G. W. (1999) New Essays on Human Understanding, Peter Remnant and Jonathan Bennett (trans.), Cambridge University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Locke, J. (1999) An Essay concerning Human Understanding, Tom L. Beauchamp (ed.), Oxford University Press, USA | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McCulloch, G. (2002) ‘Phenomenological Externalism,’ in Nicholas H. Smith (ed.) Reading McDowell: on Mind and World, Routledge, pp.123-39 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1978) ‘On “The Reality of the Past”,’ in Christopher Hookway and Philip Pettit (eds.), Action and Interpretation: Studies in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp.127-44; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality (1998), Harvard University Press, pp.295-313 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1981) ‘Anti-Realism and the Epistemology of Understanding,’ in Herman Parret and Jacques Bouveresse (eds.) Meaning and Understanding, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp.225-48; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.314-43 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1982) ‘Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge,’ Proceedings of British Academy 68, pp.455-79; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.369-94 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1984) ‘Wittgenstein on Following a Rule,’ Synthesis 58; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality (1998), Harvard University Press, pp.221-62 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1985) ‘Functionalism and Anomalous Monism,’ in Ernest LePore and Brian McLaughlin (eds.) Actions and Events: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Blackwell, Oxford, pp.387-98; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.325-40 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1986) ‘Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space,’ in Philip Pettit and John McDowell (eds.), Subject, Thought, and Context, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 137-68; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.228-59 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1987) ‘In Defense of Modesty,’ in Barry Taylor (ed.) Michael Dummett: Contributions to Philosophy, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp.59-80; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.87-107 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1989) ‘One Strand in the Private Language Argument,’ Grazer Philosophische Studien 33/34, pp.285-303; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.279-96 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1991) ‘Intentionality and Interiority in Wittgenstein,’ Klaus Puhl (ed.) Meaning Scepticism, De Gruyter, Berlin and New York, pp.148-69; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.297-321 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1993) ‘Meaning and Intentionality in Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy,’ Peter A. French, Theodore E. Uehling, Jr., and Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 17: The Wittgenstein Legacy, University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, pp.40-52; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.263-78 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1994) ‘The Content of Perceptual Experience,’ The Philosophical Quarterly 44, pp.190-205; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.341-58 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1995) ‘Knowledge and the Internal,’ in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55, pp.877-93; reprinted in his Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, pp.395-413 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1996a) Mind and World, Harvard University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1996b) ‘Two Sorts of Naturalism,’ in Rosalind Hursthouse, Gavin Lawrence, and Warren Quinn (eds.) Virtues and Reasons: Philippa Foot and Moral Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp.149-79; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.167-97 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1997) ‘Reductionism and the First Person,’ in Jonathan Dancy (ed.) Reading Parfit, Blackwell, Oxford, pp.230-50; reprinted in his Mind, Value, and Reality, pp.359-82 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1998a) ‘Response to Crispin Wright,’ in Crispin Wright, Barry C. Smith, and Cynthia Macdonald (eds.) Knowing Our Own Minds, Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp. 47-62 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1998b) ‘Reply to Commentators,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58, pp.403-31 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1998c) ‘The Woodbridge Lecture 1997: Having the World in View: Sellars, Kant, and Intentionality,’ Journal of Philosophy 95, pp.431-91 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (1999) ‘Scheme-Content Dualism and Empiricism,’ in Philosophy of Donald Davidson, pp.87-104 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2002a) ‘Gadamer and Davidson on Understanding and Relativism,’ in Jeff Malpas, Ulrich Arnswald, and Jens Kertscher (eds.) Gadamer’s Century: Essays in Honor of Hans-Georg Gadamer, MIT Press, pp.173-93 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2002b) ‘Responses,’ in Reading McDowell: on Mind and World, pp.269-305 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2002c) ‘Knowledge and the Internal Revisited,’ Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64, pp.97-105 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2003a) The Apperceptive I and the Empirical Self: Towards a Heterodox Reading of “Lordship and Bondage” in Hegel’s Phenomenology,’ Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 47/48, pp. 1-16 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2003b) ‘Hegel and the Myth of the Given,’ in Wolfgang Welsch and Klaus Vieweg (eds.), Das Interesse des Denkens: Hegel aus heutiger Sicht, München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, pp. 75-88 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2004) Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mind,’ in Mario de Caro and David Macarthur, (eds.) Naturalism in Question, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, pp.91-105 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2005a) Self-Determining Subjectivity and External Constraint,’ in Karl Ameriks and Jürgen Stolzenberg (eds.) International Yearbook of German Idealism 2005: German Idealism and Contemporary Analytic Philosophy, Walter De Gruyter Inc, pp.21-37 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2005b) ‘Conceptual Capacities in Perception,’ in Günter Abel (ed.), Kreativität: 2005 Congress of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Philosophie, pp. 1065-79 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2006a) ‘Response to Rovane,’ in McDowell and His Critics, pp.114-20 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2006b) ‘Response to Dancy,’ in McDowell and His Critics, pp.134-41 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2007a) ‘What Myth?’ Inquiry 50, pp.338-51 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2007b) ‘Response to Dreyfus,’ Inquiry 50, pp.366-70 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | McDowell, J. (2008) ‘The Disjunctive Conception of Experience as Material for a Transcendental Argument,’ in Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, and Knowledge, pp.376-89 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Martin, M. G. F. (2002) ‘The Transparency of Experience,’ Mind and Language 17, pp.376-425 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Martin, M. G. F. (2004) ‘The Limits of Self-Awareness,’ Philosophical Studies 120, pp.37-89 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Martin. M. G. F. (2006) ‘On Being Alienated,’ in Perceptual Experience, pp.354-410 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Miller, A. (2002) ‘Introduction,’ in Alexander Miller and Crispin Wright (eds.) Rule-Following and Meaning, McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp.1-15 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nagel, T. (2007) ‘The Incompleteness of Objective Reality,’ in Brie Gertler and Lawrence Shapiro (eds.), Arguing about the Mind, Routledge, pp.36-49 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Noonan, H. (2003) Personal Identity, Routledge, second edition | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Olson, E. (1999) The Human Animal: Personal Identity without Psychology, Oxford University Press, USA | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Olson, E. (2007) ‘There is No Problem of the Self,’ in Brie Gertler and Lawrence Shapiro (eds.), Arguing about the Mind, Routledge, pp.262-77 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | O’Shea, J. (2007) Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn, Polity Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons, Clarendon Press, Oxford | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Parsons, C. (1980) Non-Existent Objects, Yale University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Passmore, J. (1961) Philosophical Reasoning, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Pietroski, P. (2000) Causing Actions, Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Quine, W. V. O. (1960) Word and Object, MIT Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rorty, R. (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton University Press, Princeton | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rosenberg, J. (2007) Wilfrid Sellars: Fusing the Images, Oxford University Press, USA | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Rouse, J. (2005) ‘Mind, Body, and World: Todes and McDowell on Bodies and Language,’ Inquiry 48, pp.36-61 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Russell, B. (1917) ‘On the Notion of Cause,’ in his Mysticism and Logic, George Allen and Unwin, London, pp.132-51 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Searle, J. (1983) Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Searle, J. (1987) ‘Indeterminacy, Empiricism, and the First Person,’ Journal of Philosophy 84, pp.123-46; reprinted in his Consciousness and Language (2002), Cambridge University Press, pp.226-50 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sellars, W. (1956) ‘Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind,’ in Herbert Feigl and Michael Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 1, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp.253-329 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Sellars, W. (1962) ‘Philosophy and the Scientific Image of Man,’ in Robert Colodny (ed.), Frontiers of Science and Philosophy, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp.35-78 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Shoemaker, S. (1970) ‘Persons and Their Past,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 7, pp. 269-85 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Smith, A. D. (2002) The Problem of Perception, Harvard University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Snowdon, P. (1980-1) ‘Perception, Vision, and Causation,’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81, pp.175-92 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strawson, P. F. (1959) Individuals: an Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Methuen, London | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Strawson, P. F. (1966) The Bounds of Sense, Methuen, London | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Stroud, B. (1984) The Significance of Philosophical Scepticism, Clarendon Press, Oxford | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Thornton, T. (2004) John McDowell, McGill-Queen’s University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Todes, S. (2001) Body and World, MIT Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Travis, C. (2004) ‘The Silence of Senses,’ Mind 113, pp.57-94 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Tye, M. (2007) ‘Intentionalism and the Argument from No Common Content,’ in John Hawthorne (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 21, Northridge: Ridgeview Publishing, pp.589-613 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Williamson, T. (2000) Knowledge and Its Limits, Oxford University Press | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wilson, G. (1994) ‘Kripke on Wittgenstein on Normativity,’ in Peter A. French and Howard Wettstein (eds.) Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19, pp.366-90; reprinted in Rule-Following and Meaning, pp.234-59 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wittgenstein, L. (1958) The Blue and Brown Books, Basil Blackwell, Oxford | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wittgenstein, L. (1969) On Certainty, Basil Blackwell, Oxford | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wittgenstein, L. (1978) Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Basil Blackwell, Oxford | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wittgenstein, L. (2001) Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.), Blackwell Publishing | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wright. C. (1989) ‘Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy of Mind: Sensation, Privacy, and Intention’, presented at an American Philosophical Association symposium on Wittgenstein on December 30, 1989 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wright, C. (2002) ‘Human Nature?’ in Reading McDowell: on Mind and World, pp.140-59 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Wyller, T. (2000) ‘Kant on I, Apperception, and Imagination,’ in Audun Fsti, Peter Ulrich, and Truls Wyller (eds.) Indexicality and Idealism, Mentis Publishing, pp.89-99 | zh_TW |
