| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃冠閔 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | 林洪遠 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author (Authors) | Lin, Hong Yuan | en_US |
| dc.creator (作者) | 林洪遠 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator (作者) | Lin, Hong Yuan | en_US |
| dc.date (日期) | 2006 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 17-Sep-2009 17:02:27 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.available | 17-Sep-2009 17:02:27 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.date.issued (上傳時間) | 17-Sep-2009 17:02:27 (UTC+8) | - |
| dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) | G0921560051 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri (URI) | https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33555 | - |
| dc.description (描述) | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 宗教研究所 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 92156005 | zh_TW |
| dc.description (描述) | 95 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | 本論文所要處理的是惡的意願與非意願性的辯證。在《惡的象徵》中，悲劇神學和人學的概念便是作為辯證之中介。這兩概念與一種痛苦意識有關，所意識者就是仲裁正義者，亦是違反其正義原則的惡的來源。對「悲劇神學」而言，這個對象就是神；對「悲劇人學」而言，便是意識到人的良知隱藏著惡的可能。可見悲劇神學和人學是一相互依賴的概念。但是由於在呂格爾的象徵系列當中，尤其是玷污及罪的象徵，皆是在神與人的某種關係而論的，因此我們更為凸顯悲劇神學的概念。第二章主要從情節和美學效果兩途徑，呈現呂格爾如何由古希臘悲劇抽繹出悲劇神學和人學兩概念。第三章則著重闡述呂格爾《惡的象徵》中的玷汙/罪/罪咎象徵系列，以及突顯悲劇神學和人學如何受制於象徵系列所賦予的意義及角色。藉由象徵系列，奴隸意志的概念得以釐清。其所表達的是，由自由意志的選擇，所造成的自我囚禁之惡。第四章將悲劇概念放在神話重力場結構及基督論的脈絡中，呈現悲劇的相對位置。針對悲劇神學和人學概念，呂格爾將兩者視為批判和限制的否定性概念。另一方面，藉由基督論，嘗試呈現超克悲劇神學和人學的可能性。值得注意的是，當呂格爾將悲劇神學和人學當成批判性概念的時候，在一定程度上，便具有解構其他象徵(內含的奴隸意志成分)的力道。但是相對於基督論來講，悲劇神學和人學便是等待超越，而有所不足的概念。因此我們可以排列出相對位階：奴隸意志－初步自由(悲劇)－參與之自由(基督論)。至於結論部分，在《惡的象徵》中，我們已經看到，呂格爾將信仰和知識劃歸不同真理領域的嘗試，也看到需要以信仰或象徵語言為前理解基礎的意義領域。但是，如何在詮釋作為超越之意義領域的基督論之時，肯定其超越性又保持其意義之開放性和模糊性呢？甚至更進一步地，保持相異宗教或象徵語言之真理的可能性呢？這些都是仍待探索的議題。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract (摘要) | This thesis deals with the dialectic of the voluntary and the involuntary of evil. In The Symbolism of Evil, the mediations of the dialectic are tragic theology and tragic anthropology. They are related to the consciousness of suffering. It means awareness of the source of evil that who judges the justice is one violating its own. ‘Tragic theology’ concerns god; for ‘tragic anthropology’, it means the possibility of evil which hides in the conscience of human. One can see that tragic theology and anthropology are mutually-dependent conceptions. Even if Ricoeur’s symbolical series associate much to the relation of god and man, we stress much more the conception of ‘tragic theology’. Chapter two discusses how Ricoeur analyzes these two conceptions of tragic theology and anthropology in ways of plot and aesthetic influences.Chapter three explains the symbolical series of stain, sin, and guilt. It also deals with how tragic theology and anthropology are subject to the meaning and the role of the symbolical series. Moreover, the concept of the servile will can be clarified by means of the symbolical series, which expresses that the will of freedom results in the evil of self-enclosure.Chapter four puts the concept of tragedy in the structure of mythically gravitational space and in the context of Christology to express the unique place of tragedy. Ricoeur regards tragic theology and anthropology as the negative conceptions which is critical and limiting. Moreover, he tries to exhibit the possibility of surpassing tragic theology and anthropology which, noticeably, have the power of deconstructing other symbols (the elements of servile will within) to some extent that Ricoeur regards them as critical conceptions. But in contrast to Christology, they are conceptions which wait for being surpassed and are limited. Thus, we can manifest the hierarchical levels: the servile will－a initial freedom(tragedy)－a freedom of participation(Christology).As to the conclusion, in The Symbolism of Evil, we have seen that Ricoeur tries to divide belief and knowledge into different fields of truth and that he needs the field of meaning which regards belief or symbolical language as the fundamental of pre-understanding. But, how do we assert its transcendence and keep the openness and the ambiguity at the same time that we interpret the Christology as the sphere of transcendental meaning? Even much more, we keep the possibility of truth of different religions and symbolical languages? These are issues waiting for further investigating. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 導論………………………………………………………………………………….1一、章節安排………………………………………………………………………3二、方法論議題……………………………………………………………………6第一章 《惡的象徵》及其悲劇議題…………………………………………….9第一節 惡的象徵、神話與歷史………………………………………………..9 第二節 《惡的象徵》的方法論意識………………………………………12一、辯證策略…………………………………………………………………14二、《惡的象徵》的方法多元性………………………………………………221.詮釋學循環……………………………………………………………….22 2.象徵與解神話………………………………………………………….....302-1象徵………………………………………………………………….302-2象徵與神話的關聯……………………………………………….....302-3解神話…………………………………………………………….....373.《惡的象徵》的形式特徵………………………………………………...38第三節 悲劇議題在《惡的象徵》中的地位…………………………………..39第二章 古希臘的悲劇議題……………………………………………………..43第一節 古希臘悲劇的起因：罪咎意識………………………….…………….43第二節 悲劇神話的形成………………………………………………………46一、悲劇類型的要素…………………………………………………………..47二、悲劇的出現和呂格爾的詮釋……………………………………………..48三、悲劇神學的議題…………………………………………………………..50第三節 古希臘回應悲劇的兩種途徑：宗教和藝術…………………………56一、悲劇之外的救贖：宗教…………………………………………………..57二、悲劇之內的救贖：藝術…………………………………………………..581.悲劇類型的完整－悲劇情節之不穩定…………………………………...582.悲劇情節中的悲劇智慧……………………………………………….....603.悲劇的藝術效果……………………………………………………….....61第四節 本章總結……………………………………………………..………70第三章 呂格爾的象徵系列－玷汙、罪、罪咎………………………………73第一節 玷汙…………………………………………………………………..75一、從物質性之不潔向倫理性之不潔的過渡……………………………....75二、由玷汙向罪之象徵的過渡………………………………………………..77第二節 罪…………………………………………………………………..…80一、無限要求和有限戒律……………………………………………………..81二、罪的基本特徵－就虛無論之……………………………………………..85三、罪的基本特徵－就實質影響論之………………………………………..88四、小結………………………………………………………………………..92第三節 罪咎………………………………………………………….......94一、古希臘和猶太教的罪咎發展……………………………………………96二、保羅對「以律法稱義」的批判以及呂格爾的詮釋…………………….98三、保羅的「因信稱義」……………………………………………………100四、小結………………………………………………………………………102第四章 亞當神話和悲劇神學…………………………………………………104第一節 沉默的亞當…………………………………………………………..110一、以亞當為中心……………………………………………………………110二、以亞當與其他角色之關係為中心………………………………………112第二節 亞當神話所對應的終末論象徵……………………………………..114第三節 悲劇人學及悲劇神學之超越………………………………………..122一、悲劇人學之超越－參與之自由………………………………………....122二、悲劇神學之超越－超越報應法則……………………………………....124三、以基督論超克悲劇人學和神學………………………………………....126第五章 結論…………………………………………………………………..134參考書目……………………………………………………………………....141 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 44180 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 72681 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 73801 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 34491 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 85284 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 165237 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 349056 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 351272 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 328526 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 336622 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 176131 bytes | - |
| dc.format.extent | 72134 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | - |
| dc.source.uri (資料來源) | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0921560051 | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 惡的象徵 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 悲劇 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 悲劇神學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | 悲劇人學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | the symbolism of evil | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | tragedy | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | tragic theology | en_US |
| dc.subject (關鍵詞) | tragic anthropology | en_US |
| dc.title (題名) | 呂格爾《惡的象徵》中的悲劇神學 | zh_TW |
| dc.title (題名) | Tragic Theology in Ricoeur`s The Symbolism of Evil | en_US |
| dc.type (資料類型) | thesis | en |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Aristotle. Poetics. Translated by Malcolm Heath, Penguin Classics. London: Penguin, 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Aristotle, and George Alexander Kennedy. Aristotle on Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. Translated by George A. Kennedy. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bouchard, Larry D. Tragic Method and Tragic Theology: Evil in Contemporary Drama and Religious Thought. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1989. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Bricke, John, ed. Freedom & Morality, Lindley Lecture. Lawrence: University of Kansas, 1976. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Grene, David, and Richmond Alexander Lattimore. Greek Tragedies. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Hesiod. Theogony. Translated by Norman Oliver Brown. New York: Liberal Arts Press, 1953. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ihde, Don. Hermeneutic Phenomenology: The Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur, Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology & Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1971. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Lowe, Walter James. "The Coherence of Paul Ricoeur." The Journal of Religion 61, no. 4 (Oct., 1981): 384-402. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Nietzsche, Friedrich Wilhelm. The Birth of Tragedy. Translated by Douglas Smith, Dr. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Oates, Whitney Jennings, and Eugene O`Neill, eds. The Complete Greek Drama; All the Extant Tragedies of Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides, and the Comedies of Aristophanes and Menander, in a Variety of Translations. New York: Random House, 1938. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Plato. The Republic. Translated by G.M.A. Grube. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, 1992. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Reagan, Charles E. Paul Ricoeur: His Life and His Work. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———, ed. Studies in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1979. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ricoeur, Paul. The Conflict of Interpretations; Essays in Hermeneutics, Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology & Existential Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1974. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. Fallible Man. Translated by Charles A. Kelble. New York: Fordham University Press, 1986. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. Figuring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative, and Imagination. Translated by David Pellauer. Edited by Mark I. Wallace. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. Finitude et Culpabilité II：La Symbolique du Mal. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne, 1960. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. Finitude et Culpabilité I: L`homme Faillible. Paris: Aubier-Montaigne, 1960. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. "The Hermeneutics of Symbols and Philosophical Reflections." International Philosophical Quarterly, II (May, 1962): 191-218. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. Histoire et Vérité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1955. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. History and Truth. Translated by Charles A. Kelbley. Evanston Illinois: Northwestern University Press, 1965. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. Le Conflit Des Interprétations; Essais D`herméneutique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1969. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. A Ricoeur Reader: Reflection and Imagination. Edited by Mario J. Valdés, Theory/Culture 2. Toronto and Buffalo: University of Toronto Press, 1991. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | ———. The Symbolism of Evil. Translated by Emerson Buchanan. Boston: Beacon Press, 1972. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Ricoeur, Paul, François Azouvi, and Marc B. de Launay. Critique and Conviction: Conversations with François Azouvi and Marc De Launay. Translated by Kathleen Blamey, European Perspectives. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Robert, Piercey. "The Role of Greek Tragedy in the Philosophy of Paul Ricoeur." Philosophy Today 49, no. 1 (2005): 3. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | Segal, Charles. Tragedy and Civilization: An Interpretation of Sophocles. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1999. | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 沈清松，《呂格爾》，台北：東大，2000。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 佛洛伊德著/楊庸一譯，《圖騰與禁忌》，台北：志文，1975。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 佛洛伊德著/楊韶剛譯，《一個幻覺的未來》，台北：米娜貝爾，2001。 | zh_TW |
| dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) | 柯志明，《論惡、自我與自由的辯證關係：呂格爾(Paul Ricoeur)前期(1950-1960)主體存有學之研究》，台北：中國文化大學哲學研究所博士論文，1997。 | zh_TW |
