學術產出-Theses

題名 波羅的海三國中俄羅斯人地位的轉變─蘇聯解體前後的比較分析
作者 蕭瓊英
Hsiao, Chiung-Ying
貢獻者 周陽山
Chou, Yangsun
蕭瓊英
Hsiao, Chiung-Ying
關鍵詞 波海三國
愛沙尼亞
拉脫維亞
立陶宛
蘇維埃化
俄化
境外俄羅斯人
俄羅斯少數民族
公民權
民族認同
Baltic States
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Sovietization
Russification
Russian Abroad
Russian Minority
Russian Diaspora
Citizenship
National Identity
日期 2002
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 17:42:29 (UTC+8)
摘要 無論是沙皇政權或是蘇維埃政權,都會在侵略併吞而來的土地上實行俄化或是蘇維埃化的政策,希望能建立一個大一統的國家,創造一個享有共同文化、共同語言、甚至是有共同認同的民族。但是,1991年蘇聯的解體,不只打破了蘇共創造「蘇維埃民族」的美夢,還證明了蘇聯民族政策的嚴重錯誤。
19世紀以前,進入波海地區的俄羅斯人數量並不多。19世紀之後,沙皇政府開始在此區實行大規模的俄化,並開始將大批的俄羅斯人遷移至此。從第一次世界大戰以後到第二次世界大戰這段期間,波海三國享有了一段短暫的獨立國家時期。這個時期,基本上,波海三國對其境內的俄羅斯人是採取尊重的態度。第二次世界大戰爆發,因為德蘇密約的簽訂,使波海三國再次地被蘇聯併吞。史達林佔領波海三國之後,立刻大規模地流放波海三國的人民,並將大批的俄羅斯人引進,使愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞兩國在人口統計學上的俄化情形十分嚴重。
1985年戈巴契夫上台以後,波海三國利用改革的機會,追求獨立,最後,以非暴力的方式獲得成功,重建獨立國家。波海三國獨立以後,俄羅斯人的地位有了很大的改變,一下子從優勢的統治地位變成弱勢的少數民族。愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞因為懷疑俄羅斯人的忠誠度以及擔心會被滅族,所以採取了排外的公民權法,使大部分的俄羅斯人都無法獲得公民權。另外,因為大部分的俄羅斯人都不會說愛沙尼亞語或拉脫維亞語,所以不僅在取得公民權上有困難,在經濟與社會處境上也變得比較差。至於俄羅斯人的認同,可以說是複雜的。大多數的俄羅斯人在政治上是對所居住的共和國忠誠,在文化上還是認為自己是屬於俄羅斯文化的一部份。至於立陶宛,賦予境內大部分的俄羅斯人公民權,因此,立陶宛的族群關係較緩和。
俄羅斯政府自認為是境外俄羅斯人權益的捍衛者,但是,對於波海三國的少數民族政策所能造成的影響並不大。相反地,西方政府的批評與建議常常能成功地影響波海三國的決策。主要的原因在於波海三國急切地想回歸歐洲、西方政府與組織能提供援助、滿足國家安全需求與歐安組織派遣使節到愛、拉兩國。
No matter what it was the Czar’s regime or the Soviet government, it would always implement a policy of Russification or Sovietization on invaded lands, in order to establish a united nation with common culture, shared the same language and national identity. However, since the breaking down of the Soviet Union in 1991, not only the dream of the ‘Soviet People’ broke down, but it also suggested a misleading of ethnic-national policy.
Before the 19th century, there were not many Russians in the Baltic area. After the 19th century, the Czar’s regime started to implement the policy of Russification on a large scale, and it also moved many Russians to settle there. During the period of the First World War and the Second World War, the Baltic States had enjoyed a short period as independent nations. In this period, the Baltic States basically treated the Russians within their states with respect. Because Germany and Russia had signed a treaty before the Second World War, therefore, when the war erupted, the Baltic States were once again occupied by the Russia. After Stalin took over the Baltic States, he exiles people from the Baltic States on a large scale, while moving many Russians into these countries. As a result, Estonia and Latvia were seriously Russificated demogranphically.
In 1985, Gorbachev gained the power. While the Russia government was reforming its political entity, the Baltic States seized the opportunity to go independent. They successfully gained their independence through non-violent method and rebuild themselves as independent states. Ever since the Baltic States became independent, the status of the Russians within their regions had changed rapidly. The Russians were once the dominant ruling class and suddenly became the ruled minority. Estonia and Latvia are concerned with the issues of royalty of the Russian people, also they were worried that they would become extinct as an ethnic group, therefore, they adopted an exclusive citizenship laws. Because most of the Russians could not speak Estonian and Latvian languages, therefore, they had difficulties to acquire the citizenship and they also did poorly financially and politically within these two nations. As for the notion of the Russian identity, it was a very complicated issue. Most Russians are politically royal to the Republics they reside, but culturally they still considered themselves as part of the Russian culture. In Lithuania, it granted most of the Russians that reside in its nation the citizenship; therefore, the ethnic relationship within the country was less tense comparatively.
Russian government always views itself as the protector of the rights of its people that reside in other countries. However, this does not affect the policies regarding the minority in the Baltic States. On the other hand, the criticism and suggestions from the western governments can often affect the process of the policy-making in the Baltic States. The main reason is that the Baltic States are eager to return to Europe, and they can acquire aids from the western governments and organizations, securing their nations. Another reason is Estonia and Latvia hopefully get rid of the representatives from OSCE as soon as possible.
參考文獻 一、中文文獻
書籍:
尹慶耀,蘇維埃帝國的消亡,五南圖書出版有限公司,民國83年5月,初版一刷。
李邁先,俄國史(上卷),國立編譯館出版,正中書局發行,民國84年初版九刷。
楊默夫,紅色鋼人—史大林,克寧出版社,1991年8月,初版。
蔡百銓譯,俄羅斯、蘇聯與其後的歷史,國立編譯館,民國84年10月初版。
期刊:
Lubomyr Hajda著,吳之敏譯,「戈巴契夫面臨民族問題」,東方雜誌,復刊第22卷,第7期,民國78年1月1日,頁59-65。
李玉珍,「蘇聯民族政策之探討」,問題與研究,第23卷,第7期,頁92-104。
周慶生,一種立法模式兩種政治結果─魁北克與愛沙尼亞語言立法比較,世界民族,1999年第2期,頁21至31。
茅慧青,「波羅的海三國獨立經過」,問題與研究,第31卷,第6期,民國81年6月,頁79-91。
陳治世,「論蘇聯民族政策」,國立政治大學學報第十四期,民國55年12月14日,頁217-245。
薩公強,「從決策過程剖析戈巴契夫失敗的原因」,共黨問題研究,第20卷,第7期,民國83年,頁90-98。
「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第4期(民國79年1月),頁89。
「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第5期(民國79年2月)頁91。
「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第9期(民國79年6月)頁4。
「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第9期(民國79年6月)頁84
博碩士論文:
呂岳憲,波羅的海三國獨立運動之研究—由國際法理論探討。淡江大學俄羅斯研究所,民83年1月。
胡漢平,列寧主義民族問題之研究,政治作戰學校政治研究所,民國78年6月。
陳振華,蘇聯民族問題之研究,政治作戰學校政治研究所,民80年6月。
黃榮河,列寧的民族自決理論與實踐,政治作戰學校政治研究所,民國78年6月。
二、英文文獻
書籍:
Azrael, Jeremy R., ed. Soviet Nationality Policies and Practices. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1978.
Chinn, Jeff & Robert Kaiser. Russians as New Minority— Enthnicity and Nationalism in the Soviet Successor States. Westview Press, Inc., Adivision of HarperCollins Publisher, Inc., 1996.
Clemen, Jr. Walter C., Baltic Independence and Russian Empire. Macmillan Academic and Professional Ltd., 1991.
Dreifelds, Juris. Latvia in Transition. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Edited by Bremmer, Ian, and Ray Taras. New States, New Politics: Building the Post-Soviet Nations. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
Hiden, John, and Partick Salmon. The Baltic Nations and Europe— Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania in the Twentieth Century. Longman, 1996.
Iwaskiw, Walter R., ed. Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—Country Studies. Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1996
Karklins, Rasma, Ethnopolitics and Transition to Democracy: The Collapse of the USSR and Latvia. The John Hopkins University Press, 1994.
Kolarz, Walter. Russia and Her Colonies. New York : F. A. Praeger, 1952.
Kolstoe, Paul. Russians in the Former Soviet Republics. Indiana University Press, 1995.
Laitin, David D. Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Cornell University Press, 1998.
Lejiņš, Atis, and Daina Bleiere, ed. The Baltic States: Search For Security. Latvian Institute of International Affairs, 1996.
Lieven, Anatol. The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Path to Independence. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1997.
Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan. Problem of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore and London, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.
Misiunas, Romuald J. & Rein Taagepera. The Baltic States— Years of Dependence 1940-1990. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1993.
Nørgaard, Ole. The Baltic States after Independence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.
Raun, Toivo U. Estonia and The Estonians. Hoover Institution Press, 1991.
Shlapentokh, Vladimir, Munir Sendich, and Emil Payin, ed. The New Russian Diaspora: Russian Minorites in the Former Soviet Republics. M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 1994.
Smith, Graham, ed. The Nationalities Question in the Post-Soviet States, 2nd ed. London and New York: Longman, 1996. (A)
Smith, Graham, The Baltic States: The National self-Determination of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. New York: St. Martin’s press, 1996. (B)
Thaden, Edward C., ed. Russification in the Baltic Provinces and Finland, 1855-1914. Princeton University Press, 1981.
Trapans, Jan Arveds., ed. Toward Independence: The Baltic Popular Movements. Westview Press, Inc., 1991.
期刊:
Aasland, Aadne, & Tone Fløtten. “Ethnic and Social Exclusion in Estonia and Latvia.” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 53, No. 7 (2000), pp.1023-1049.
Aasland, Aadne. “Citizenship Status and Social Exclusion in Estonia and Latvia.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXXIII, No. 1 (Spring 2002), pp.57-77.
Aasland, Aadne. “The Russian Population in Latvia: An Integrated Minority?.” The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 10, No. 2 (June 1994), pp.233-260.
Barrington, Lowell. “The Domestic and International Consequence of Citizenship in the Soviet Successor States.” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 47, No. 2 (1995), pp.731-763.
Bilinsky, Yaroslav. “The Rulers and the Ruled,” Problems of Communism, Vol. 16. No. 5.(Sept.-Oct., 1967), p.17
Brubaker, W. Rogers. “Citizenship Struggles in Soviet Successor States.” International Migration Review, Vol. 26, No. 2 (Summer 1992),, pp.269-291.
Dunlop, John B. “Will the Russian Return from the Near Abroad?.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 35, No. 4 (1994), pp.204-215.
Dunlop, John B. “Will a Large-Scale Migration of Russians to the Russian Republic Take Place Over the Current Decade?.,” International Migration Review, Vol. XXVII, No. 3 (Autumn, 1993), pp.605-629.
Evans, Geoffrey. “Ethnic Schism and the Consolidation of Post-Communist Democracies - The Case of Estonia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1 (1998), pp.57-74.
Harris, Chauncy D. ”The New Russian Minorities: A Statistical Overview.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 34, No. 1 (1993), pp.1-27
Harris, Chauncy D. “Ethnic Tensions in the Successor Republics in 1993 and Early 1994.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 35, No. 4 (1994), pp.185-230.
Hass, Alin. “Non-Violence in Ethnic Relations in Estonia.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXVII, No. 1 (Spring 1996), pp.47-76.
Henning, Detlef. “Foreign-Language Teaching in the Baltic Republics in the Past and Present.” European Education, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Fall 1994), p.49-58.
Järve, Priit. “Two Waves of Language Laws in the Baltic states: Change of Rationale?.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXXIII, No. 1 (Spring 2002), pp.78-110
Kirch, Aksel, Marika Kirch and Tarmo Tuisk. “Russians in the Baltic States: To Be or Not To Be?.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXIV, No. 2 (Summer 1993), pp.173-188.
Kolstø, Pål. “The New Russian Diaspora – an Identity of Its Own? Possible Identity Trajectories for Russians in the Former Soviet Republic.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 19, No. 13 (July, 1996), pp.609-639.
Maley, William. “Does Russia Speak for Baltic Russians?.” The World Today, Vol. 51. No.1 (January, 1995), pp.4-6.
Park, Andrus. “Ethnicity and Independence: The Casa of Estonia in Comparative Perspective.” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 46, No. 1 (1994), pp.69-87.
Raun, Toivo U. “Estonia in the 1990S.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXXII, No. 1 (Spring 2001), pp.19-43.
Raun, Toivo U. “Post-Soviet Estonia, 1991-1993.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXV, No. 1 (Spring 1994), pp.73-80.
Rose, Richard. “Economic Conditions of Nationalities in the Baltics.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 36, No. 8 (1995), pp.475-495.
Rudenshiold, Eric. “Ethnic Dimensions in Contemporary Latvian Politics: Focusing Forces for Change.” Soviet Studies, Vol. 44, No. 4 (1992), pp.609-639.
Schafer, Robert B. and Elisabeth A. Schafer. “Latvia in Transition: A Study of Change in a Former Republic of the USSR.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXIV, No. 2 (Summer 1993), pp.161-172.
Senn, Alfred Erich. “Lithuania’s First Two Years of Independence.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXV, No. 1 (Spring 1994), pp.81-88.
Smith, Graham. “Transnational Politics and the Politics of the Russian Diaspora.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol.22, No.3 (May 1999), pp.500-523.
Vihalemm, Triin. “Group Identity Formation Processes Among Russian- Speaking Settlers of Estonia: A linguistic Perspective.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXX, No. 1 (Spring 1999), pp.18-39.
Zvinkliene, Alina. “The Creation of a National State: the case of inter-ethnic marriage in Lithuania.” Anthropological Journal on European Cultures, Vol. 5. No. 6. (1996), pp.111-134.
“War of Nerves”, Time Weekly, (New York: The Time Inc. April 2, 1990) , pp.18-19.
報紙:
“Gorbachev Warns Lithuanians of Tragedy over Separatism.” China Post, Taipei, January 12, 1990, p1.
“Nationalists in Estonia, Latvia Sweep to victory.” China Post, March 20, 1990. p1.
“Lithuania Asks Gorbachev Not to Take New Measures.” China Post, Taipei, April 11, 1990, p.1.
“Moscow Cuts Oil, Reduces Natural Gas to Lithuania.” China Post, Taipei, April 20, 1990, p.1.
“Three Baltic Republics Recreate Baltic Council.” China Post, Taipei, May, 13, 1990, P.1.
“Moscow Says Blockade Fully Lifted Against Lithuania.” China Post, Taipei, July, 4, 1990, P.2
三、網路資料
“Republic of Latvia Law on Citizenship 1994,” 拉脫維亞公民權法網址http://www.uta.edu/cpsees/latcit.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日
“Russian Communities in Estonia”, http://www.einst.ee/society/russian_communities.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日
1991年12月5日通過的立陶宛公民權法,全文內容可參閱網址:http://www.tm.lt/Litlex/Eng/Frames/Laws/Documents/55.HTM, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日
1995年愛沙尼亞語言法的全文,全文內容可參閱網址:http://www.riga.lv/minelres/NationalLegislation/Estonia/Estonia_Language_English.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日
Brian E. Moffitt, “Russian Minorities and Citizenship Laws in the Baltics,” http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Aegean/9058/intr2.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年4月28日
Grazina Miniotate著,林哲夫譯,《立陶宛的非暴力抗爭》http://www.geocities.com/tranps2000/book004/LIc03.htm 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日
Mart Rannut, “Estonian Language Syrategy in Progress”, http://www.linguapax.org/congres/taller/taller3/article22_ang.html 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。
Oligerts Eglitis著,林哲夫譯,《拉脫維亞的非暴力抗》 http://www.geocities.com/tranps2000/book003/LAc02.htm 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日
Rob Zagman, “Conflict Prevention in the Baltic States: The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania,” (Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues, 1999, vii + 71 pp. ISBN 3-932635-08-6) http://www.ecmi.de/doc/download/monograph_1.pdf, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日
立陶宛資料統計機關,網址:http://www.std.lt/web/main.php 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。
拉脫維亞統計機關,網址:http://www.csb.lv/ 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。
愛沙尼亞統計機關,網址:http://www.stat.ee/ 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
俄羅斯研究所
86263009
91
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086263009
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 周陽山zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chou, Yangsunen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 蕭瓊英zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Hsiao, Chiung-Yingen_US
dc.creator (作者) 蕭瓊英zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Hsiao, Chiung-Yingen_US
dc.date (日期) 2002en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 17:42:29 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 17:42:29 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 17:42:29 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0086263009en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33617-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 俄羅斯研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 86263009zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 91zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 無論是沙皇政權或是蘇維埃政權,都會在侵略併吞而來的土地上實行俄化或是蘇維埃化的政策,希望能建立一個大一統的國家,創造一個享有共同文化、共同語言、甚至是有共同認同的民族。但是,1991年蘇聯的解體,不只打破了蘇共創造「蘇維埃民族」的美夢,還證明了蘇聯民族政策的嚴重錯誤。
19世紀以前,進入波海地區的俄羅斯人數量並不多。19世紀之後,沙皇政府開始在此區實行大規模的俄化,並開始將大批的俄羅斯人遷移至此。從第一次世界大戰以後到第二次世界大戰這段期間,波海三國享有了一段短暫的獨立國家時期。這個時期,基本上,波海三國對其境內的俄羅斯人是採取尊重的態度。第二次世界大戰爆發,因為德蘇密約的簽訂,使波海三國再次地被蘇聯併吞。史達林佔領波海三國之後,立刻大規模地流放波海三國的人民,並將大批的俄羅斯人引進,使愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞兩國在人口統計學上的俄化情形十分嚴重。
1985年戈巴契夫上台以後,波海三國利用改革的機會,追求獨立,最後,以非暴力的方式獲得成功,重建獨立國家。波海三國獨立以後,俄羅斯人的地位有了很大的改變,一下子從優勢的統治地位變成弱勢的少數民族。愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞因為懷疑俄羅斯人的忠誠度以及擔心會被滅族,所以採取了排外的公民權法,使大部分的俄羅斯人都無法獲得公民權。另外,因為大部分的俄羅斯人都不會說愛沙尼亞語或拉脫維亞語,所以不僅在取得公民權上有困難,在經濟與社會處境上也變得比較差。至於俄羅斯人的認同,可以說是複雜的。大多數的俄羅斯人在政治上是對所居住的共和國忠誠,在文化上還是認為自己是屬於俄羅斯文化的一部份。至於立陶宛,賦予境內大部分的俄羅斯人公民權,因此,立陶宛的族群關係較緩和。
俄羅斯政府自認為是境外俄羅斯人權益的捍衛者,但是,對於波海三國的少數民族政策所能造成的影響並不大。相反地,西方政府的批評與建議常常能成功地影響波海三國的決策。主要的原因在於波海三國急切地想回歸歐洲、西方政府與組織能提供援助、滿足國家安全需求與歐安組織派遣使節到愛、拉兩國。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) No matter what it was the Czar’s regime or the Soviet government, it would always implement a policy of Russification or Sovietization on invaded lands, in order to establish a united nation with common culture, shared the same language and national identity. However, since the breaking down of the Soviet Union in 1991, not only the dream of the ‘Soviet People’ broke down, but it also suggested a misleading of ethnic-national policy.
Before the 19th century, there were not many Russians in the Baltic area. After the 19th century, the Czar’s regime started to implement the policy of Russification on a large scale, and it also moved many Russians to settle there. During the period of the First World War and the Second World War, the Baltic States had enjoyed a short period as independent nations. In this period, the Baltic States basically treated the Russians within their states with respect. Because Germany and Russia had signed a treaty before the Second World War, therefore, when the war erupted, the Baltic States were once again occupied by the Russia. After Stalin took over the Baltic States, he exiles people from the Baltic States on a large scale, while moving many Russians into these countries. As a result, Estonia and Latvia were seriously Russificated demogranphically.
In 1985, Gorbachev gained the power. While the Russia government was reforming its political entity, the Baltic States seized the opportunity to go independent. They successfully gained their independence through non-violent method and rebuild themselves as independent states. Ever since the Baltic States became independent, the status of the Russians within their regions had changed rapidly. The Russians were once the dominant ruling class and suddenly became the ruled minority. Estonia and Latvia are concerned with the issues of royalty of the Russian people, also they were worried that they would become extinct as an ethnic group, therefore, they adopted an exclusive citizenship laws. Because most of the Russians could not speak Estonian and Latvian languages, therefore, they had difficulties to acquire the citizenship and they also did poorly financially and politically within these two nations. As for the notion of the Russian identity, it was a very complicated issue. Most Russians are politically royal to the Republics they reside, but culturally they still considered themselves as part of the Russian culture. In Lithuania, it granted most of the Russians that reside in its nation the citizenship; therefore, the ethnic relationship within the country was less tense comparatively.
Russian government always views itself as the protector of the rights of its people that reside in other countries. However, this does not affect the policies regarding the minority in the Baltic States. On the other hand, the criticism and suggestions from the western governments can often affect the process of the policy-making in the Baltic States. The main reason is that the Baltic States are eager to return to Europe, and they can acquire aids from the western governments and organizations, securing their nations. Another reason is Estonia and Latvia hopefully get rid of the representatives from OSCE as soon as possible.
en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 內 容 目 錄

第一章 緒論•••••••••••••••••••••1
第一節 研究動機與目的••••••••••••••3
第二節 研究方法與限制••••••••••••••4
第三節 研究範圍與架構••••••••••••••5
第四節 文獻分析•••••••••••••••••6
第五節 名詞解釋•••••••••••••••••10
第二章 蘇聯解體前波海三國境內的俄羅斯人及其處境•••13
第一節 帝俄與蘇聯的民族政策•••••••••••15
第二節 1940年以前波海三國與俄羅斯的關係•••••27
第三節 1940年到1985年波海三國與蘇聯的關係••••37
第四節 小結•••••••••••••••••••59
第三章 蘇聯解體與波海三國的獨立運動•••••••••61
第一節 戈巴契夫改革與波海三國的民族問題•••••63
第二節 立陶宛的獨立運動•••••••••••••72
第三節 愛沙尼亞的獨立運動••••••••••••77
第四節 拉脫維亞的獨立運動••••••••••••82
第五節 小結•••••••••••••••••••85
第四章 波海三國獨立後的俄羅斯人處境•••••••••87
第一節 政治地位與公民身份••••••••••••89
第二節 經濟與社會處境••••••••••••••103
第三節 語言與文化氛圍••••••••••••••118
第四節 民族與國家認同••••••••••••••126
第五節 小結•••••••••••••••••••135
第五章 國際反應與波海三國各國的回應態度•••••••137
第一節 俄國的態度••••••••••••••••139
第二節 歐盟的態度••••••••••••••••143
第三節 小結•••••••••••••••••••149
第六章 結論•••••••••••••••••••••151
參考文獻•••••••••••••••••••••••157
附錄•••••••••••••••••••••••••165
附錄一:蘇聯各加盟共和國中,俄羅斯人所佔的比••••167
附錄二:波海三國與俄羅斯的位置圖••••••••••168
附錄三:波羅的海三國概況••••••••••••••169
附錄四:三國重要城市位置圖•••••••••••••171
附錄五:蘇聯、俄羅斯聯邦與波海三國的國旗與國徽•••173

表 目 錄
表1-1 「離散民族」的一般特點和各共和國境內俄羅斯人的情況••••••••••••••••••••••• 12
表2-1 蘇聯各共和國內本地人(indigenous)與俄羅斯人(Russians)組成的比例••••••••••••••••••• 25
表2-2 波海三國,1989年各國境內主要民族的數量;1930年代、1959年、1970年、1979年、1989年各國主要民族在全國人口中所佔的比例以及1959年到1989年該比例的變化。•••••••••••••••••••••••39
表2-3 1930年-1980年波海三國共黨規模與三國本國人在黨中所佔的比例••••••••••••••••••••••43
表2-4 波海三國1950-1979年人口的增加••••••••••46
表2-5 波海三國1939-1980年全國總人口數與本國族人所佔的比例••••••••••••••••••••••••46
表2-6 波海三國人民以俄文為第二語言的比例••••••••48
表2-7 1945-55年波海三國人口的改變•••••••••••54
表2-8 蘇聯和波海三國的出生率和死亡率,1940-1980年•••55
表4-1 2000年愛沙尼亞境內各族群擁有公民權的人數比例••••••••••••••••••••••••94
表4-2 拉脫維亞境內各族群中公民與非公民的人數與比例(1994年1月) •••••••••••••••••••••••96
表4-3 波海三國公民權法的比較••••••••••••••102
表4-4 愛沙尼亞淨移民人數(1985-1994年) •••••••••106
表4-5 愛沙尼亞境內主要民族組成狀況與比例變化(1989年與2000年) •••••••••••••••••••••••108
表4-6 拉脫維亞境內族群比例的消長(1989年與2000年) •••110
表4-7 立陶宛境內族群組成情況比較••••••••••••111
表4-8本地人口與俄化人口的勞動市場參與率與失業率••••••••••••••••••••••••113
表4-9 在過去一年當中(1994),波海三國中本國人與俄羅斯家庭收支狀況••••••••••••••••••••••114
表4-10 累計的社會排斥指數(Additive Index of Social Exclusion)••••••••••••••••••••116
表 4-11 愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞兩國境內,俄語人口(主要是俄羅斯人)在蘇聯解體前(1990年6-8月)、後(1992年),國家認同的比較•••••••••••••••••••••••128
表4-12 波海三國境內俄羅斯人對俄羅斯政府及其所居住的政府的評價•••••••••••••••••••••••129
表 4-13 境外俄羅斯人可能產生的認同•••••••••••132

圖 目 錄

圖2-1 愛沙尼亞與拉脫維亞境內俄羅斯人大量聚集居住的區域••• •••••••••••••••••••••••• 57
圖3-1 1989年4月、9月及1990年5月愛沙尼亞人與非愛沙尼亞人對「愛沙尼亞自蘇聯完全獨立出來」的支持度調查••••••••••••••••••••••••78
圖4-1 波海三國境內俄羅斯人的居住年數(1993年末所做的調查) •••••••••••••••••••••••105
圖4-2 自愛沙尼亞移民到俄羅斯的人數(1990-1992) •••••107
圖4-3 拉脫維亞移民狀況(1961年-1992年)••••••••109
圖4-4 自拉脫維亞移民到俄羅斯的人數(1990-1992) •••••109
圖4-5 自立陶宛移民到俄羅斯的人數(1990-1992) ••••••110
圖4-6 1989年與2000年拉脫維亞境內各民族會脫維亞語的比例•••••••••••••••••••••••124
圖4-7 波海三國的地方自治•••••••••••••••131
zh_TW
dc.format.extent 13584 bytes-
dc.format.extent 17991 bytes-
dc.format.extent 22350 bytes-
dc.format.extent 21733 bytes-
dc.format.extent 41376 bytes-
dc.format.extent 276592 bytes-
dc.format.extent 95634 bytes-
dc.format.extent 337321 bytes-
dc.format.extent 389646 bytes-
dc.format.extent 19558 bytes-
dc.format.extent 35909 bytes-
dc.format.extent 612460 bytes-
dc.format.extent 751781 bytes-
dc.format.extent 69598 bytes-
dc.format.extent 960211 bytes-
dc.format.extent 333636 bytes-
dc.format.extent 787013 bytes-
dc.format.extent 368535 bytes-
dc.format.extent 608679 bytes-
dc.format.extent 506221 bytes-
dc.format.extent 154405 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086263009en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 波海三國zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 愛沙尼亞zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 拉脫維亞zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 立陶宛zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 蘇維埃化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 俄化zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 境外俄羅斯人zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 俄羅斯少數民族zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 公民權zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 民族認同zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Baltic Statesen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Estoniaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Latviaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Lithuaniaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Sovietizationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Russificationen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Russian Abroaden_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Russian Minorityen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Russian Diasporaen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Citizenshipen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) National Identityen_US
dc.title (題名) 波羅的海三國中俄羅斯人地位的轉變─蘇聯解體前後的比較分析zh_TW
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、中文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 書籍:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 尹慶耀,蘇維埃帝國的消亡,五南圖書出版有限公司,民國83年5月,初版一刷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李邁先,俄國史(上卷),國立編譯館出版,正中書局發行,民國84年初版九刷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 楊默夫,紅色鋼人—史大林,克寧出版社,1991年8月,初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 蔡百銓譯,俄羅斯、蘇聯與其後的歷史,國立編譯館,民國84年10月初版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 期刊:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lubomyr Hajda著,吳之敏譯,「戈巴契夫面臨民族問題」,東方雜誌,復刊第22卷,第7期,民國78年1月1日,頁59-65。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李玉珍,「蘇聯民族政策之探討」,問題與研究,第23卷,第7期,頁92-104。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 周慶生,一種立法模式兩種政治結果─魁北克與愛沙尼亞語言立法比較,世界民族,1999年第2期,頁21至31。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 茅慧青,「波羅的海三國獨立經過」,問題與研究,第31卷,第6期,民國81年6月,頁79-91。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳治世,「論蘇聯民族政策」,國立政治大學學報第十四期,民國55年12月14日,頁217-245。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 薩公強,「從決策過程剖析戈巴契夫失敗的原因」,共黨問題研究,第20卷,第7期,民國83年,頁90-98。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第4期(民國79年1月),頁89。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第5期(民國79年2月)頁91。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第9期(民國79年6月)頁4。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 「蘇聯動態述評」,問題與研究,第29卷第9期(民國79年6月)頁84zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 博碩士論文:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 呂岳憲,波羅的海三國獨立運動之研究—由國際法理論探討。淡江大學俄羅斯研究所,民83年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 胡漢平,列寧主義民族問題之研究,政治作戰學校政治研究所,民國78年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 陳振華,蘇聯民族問題之研究,政治作戰學校政治研究所,民80年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃榮河,列寧的民族自決理論與實踐,政治作戰學校政治研究所,民國78年6月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、英文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 書籍:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Azrael, Jeremy R., ed. Soviet Nationality Policies and Practices. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1978.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Chinn, Jeff & Robert Kaiser. Russians as New Minority— Enthnicity and Nationalism in the Soviet Successor States. Westview Press, Inc., Adivision of HarperCollins Publisher, Inc., 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clemen, Jr. Walter C., Baltic Independence and Russian Empire. Macmillan Academic and Professional Ltd., 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dreifelds, Juris. Latvia in Transition. Cambridge University Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Edited by Bremmer, Ian, and Ray Taras. New States, New Politics: Building the Post-Soviet Nations. Cambridge University Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hiden, John, and Partick Salmon. The Baltic Nations and Europe— Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania in the Twentieth Century. Longman, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Iwaskiw, Walter R., ed. Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania—Country Studies. Headquarters, Department of the Army, 1996zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Karklins, Rasma, Ethnopolitics and Transition to Democracy: The Collapse of the USSR and Latvia. The John Hopkins University Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kolarz, Walter. Russia and Her Colonies. New York : F. A. Praeger, 1952.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kolstoe, Paul. Russians in the Former Soviet Republics. Indiana University Press, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Laitin, David D. Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Cornell University Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lejiņš, Atis, and Daina Bleiere, ed. The Baltic States: Search For Security. Latvian Institute of International Affairs, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lieven, Anatol. The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Path to Independence. Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Linz, Juan J. and Alfred Stepan. Problem of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore and London, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Misiunas, Romuald J. & Rein Taagepera. The Baltic States— Years of Dependence 1940-1990. Berkeley : University of California Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nørgaard, Ole. The Baltic States after Independence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Raun, Toivo U. Estonia and The Estonians. Hoover Institution Press, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shlapentokh, Vladimir, Munir Sendich, and Emil Payin, ed. The New Russian Diaspora: Russian Minorites in the Former Soviet Republics. M. E. Sharpe, Inc., 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Graham, ed. The Nationalities Question in the Post-Soviet States, 2nd ed. London and New York: Longman, 1996. (A)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Graham, The Baltic States: The National self-Determination of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. New York: St. Martin’s press, 1996. (B)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thaden, Edward C., ed. Russification in the Baltic Provinces and Finland, 1855-1914. Princeton University Press, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Trapans, Jan Arveds., ed. Toward Independence: The Baltic Popular Movements. Westview Press, Inc., 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 期刊:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aasland, Aadne, & Tone Fløtten. “Ethnic and Social Exclusion in Estonia and Latvia.” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 53, No. 7 (2000), pp.1023-1049.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aasland, Aadne. “Citizenship Status and Social Exclusion in Estonia and Latvia.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXXIII, No. 1 (Spring 2002), pp.57-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Aasland, Aadne. “The Russian Population in Latvia: An Integrated Minority?.” The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, Vol. 10, No. 2 (June 1994), pp.233-260.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barrington, Lowell. “The Domestic and International Consequence of Citizenship in the Soviet Successor States.” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 47, No. 2 (1995), pp.731-763.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bilinsky, Yaroslav. “The Rulers and the Ruled,” Problems of Communism, Vol. 16. No. 5.(Sept.-Oct., 1967), p.17zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brubaker, W. Rogers. “Citizenship Struggles in Soviet Successor States.” International Migration Review, Vol. 26, No. 2 (Summer 1992),, pp.269-291.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dunlop, John B. “Will the Russian Return from the Near Abroad?.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 35, No. 4 (1994), pp.204-215.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dunlop, John B. “Will a Large-Scale Migration of Russians to the Russian Republic Take Place Over the Current Decade?.,” International Migration Review, Vol. XXVII, No. 3 (Autumn, 1993), pp.605-629.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evans, Geoffrey. “Ethnic Schism and the Consolidation of Post-Communist Democracies - The Case of Estonia.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1 (1998), pp.57-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harris, Chauncy D. ”The New Russian Minorities: A Statistical Overview.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 34, No. 1 (1993), pp.1-27zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Harris, Chauncy D. “Ethnic Tensions in the Successor Republics in 1993 and Early 1994.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 35, No. 4 (1994), pp.185-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hass, Alin. “Non-Violence in Ethnic Relations in Estonia.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXVII, No. 1 (Spring 1996), pp.47-76.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Henning, Detlef. “Foreign-Language Teaching in the Baltic Republics in the Past and Present.” European Education, Vol. 26, No. 3 (Fall 1994), p.49-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Järve, Priit. “Two Waves of Language Laws in the Baltic states: Change of Rationale?.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXXIII, No. 1 (Spring 2002), pp.78-110zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kirch, Aksel, Marika Kirch and Tarmo Tuisk. “Russians in the Baltic States: To Be or Not To Be?.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXIV, No. 2 (Summer 1993), pp.173-188.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kolstø, Pål. “The New Russian Diaspora – an Identity of Its Own? Possible Identity Trajectories for Russians in the Former Soviet Republic.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 19, No. 13 (July, 1996), pp.609-639.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maley, William. “Does Russia Speak for Baltic Russians?.” The World Today, Vol. 51. No.1 (January, 1995), pp.4-6.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Park, Andrus. “Ethnicity and Independence: The Casa of Estonia in Comparative Perspective.” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 46, No. 1 (1994), pp.69-87.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Raun, Toivo U. “Estonia in the 1990S.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXXII, No. 1 (Spring 2001), pp.19-43.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Raun, Toivo U. “Post-Soviet Estonia, 1991-1993.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXV, No. 1 (Spring 1994), pp.73-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rose, Richard. “Economic Conditions of Nationalities in the Baltics.” Post-Soviet Geography, Vol. 36, No. 8 (1995), pp.475-495.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rudenshiold, Eric. “Ethnic Dimensions in Contemporary Latvian Politics: Focusing Forces for Change.” Soviet Studies, Vol. 44, No. 4 (1992), pp.609-639.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Schafer, Robert B. and Elisabeth A. Schafer. “Latvia in Transition: A Study of Change in a Former Republic of the USSR.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXIV, No. 2 (Summer 1993), pp.161-172.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Senn, Alfred Erich. “Lithuania’s First Two Years of Independence.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXV, No. 1 (Spring 1994), pp.81-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Graham. “Transnational Politics and the Politics of the Russian Diaspora.” Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol.22, No.3 (May 1999), pp.500-523.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vihalemm, Triin. “Group Identity Formation Processes Among Russian- Speaking Settlers of Estonia: A linguistic Perspective.” Journal of Baltic Studies, Vol. XXX, No. 1 (Spring 1999), pp.18-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Zvinkliene, Alina. “The Creation of a National State: the case of inter-ethnic marriage in Lithuania.” Anthropological Journal on European Cultures, Vol. 5. No. 6. (1996), pp.111-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “War of Nerves”, Time Weekly, (New York: The Time Inc. April 2, 1990) , pp.18-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 報紙:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Gorbachev Warns Lithuanians of Tragedy over Separatism.” China Post, Taipei, January 12, 1990, p1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Nationalists in Estonia, Latvia Sweep to victory.” China Post, March 20, 1990. p1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Lithuania Asks Gorbachev Not to Take New Measures.” China Post, Taipei, April 11, 1990, p.1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Moscow Cuts Oil, Reduces Natural Gas to Lithuania.” China Post, Taipei, April 20, 1990, p.1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Three Baltic Republics Recreate Baltic Council.” China Post, Taipei, May, 13, 1990, P.1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Moscow Says Blockade Fully Lifted Against Lithuania.” China Post, Taipei, July, 4, 1990, P.2zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 三、網路資料zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Republic of Latvia Law on Citizenship 1994,” 拉脫維亞公民權法網址http://www.uta.edu/cpsees/latcit.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) “Russian Communities in Estonia”, http://www.einst.ee/society/russian_communities.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1991年12月5日通過的立陶宛公民權法,全文內容可參閱網址:http://www.tm.lt/Litlex/Eng/Frames/Laws/Documents/55.HTM, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 1995年愛沙尼亞語言法的全文,全文內容可參閱網址:http://www.riga.lv/minelres/NationalLegislation/Estonia/Estonia_Language_English.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brian E. Moffitt, “Russian Minorities and Citizenship Laws in the Baltics,” http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Aegean/9058/intr2.htm, 上網檢視日期:2003年4月28日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grazina Miniotate著,林哲夫譯,《立陶宛的非暴力抗爭》http://www.geocities.com/tranps2000/book004/LIc03.htm 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mart Rannut, “Estonian Language Syrategy in Progress”, http://www.linguapax.org/congres/taller/taller3/article22_ang.html 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Oligerts Eglitis著,林哲夫譯,《拉脫維亞的非暴力抗》 http://www.geocities.com/tranps2000/book003/LAc02.htm 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rob Zagman, “Conflict Prevention in the Baltic States: The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania,” (Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues, 1999, vii + 71 pp. ISBN 3-932635-08-6) http://www.ecmi.de/doc/download/monograph_1.pdf, 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 立陶宛資料統計機關,網址:http://www.std.lt/web/main.php 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 拉脫維亞統計機關,網址:http://www.csb.lv/ 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 愛沙尼亞統計機關,網址:http://www.stat.ee/ 上網檢視日期:2003年5月30日。zh_TW