1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. Publications
  3. College of International Affairs
  4. Theses
  5. Item

Publications-Theses

Article View/Open

Publication Export

Google ScholarTM

NCCU Library

Citation Infomation

Related Publications in TAIR

題名 英國學派-被忽視的國際關係理論
English School- The Neglected International Relations Theory
作者 李卓濤
Lee, Juo-Tau
貢獻者 姜家雄
Chiang, Alex
李卓濤
Lee, Juo-Tau
關鍵詞 英國學派
理性主義
國際社會
現實主義
革命主義
國際體系
世界社會
實證主義
詮釋學
English School
Rationalism
International Society
Realism
Revolutionism
International System
World Society
Positivism
Interpretivism
日期 2004
上傳時間 17-Sep-2009 17:52:08 (UTC+8)
摘要 國際關係也是社會關係的一環，對國際關係的研究必須植基於國家涉入的歷史、社會、文化等層面進行探求，否則很難對國際關係有著全貌的了解。在美國學界的實證主義長期宰制下，研究國際社會的英國學派長期受到忽視，隱沒於線性發展的歷史中。

為了發掘英國學派受到忽視的地位，本論文擬從下三點著手。首先，回溯英國學派的歷史起源、代表學者、名稱問題；再者，耙梳、整理英國學派的學術內涵，包括現實主義、理性主義及革命主義三個傳統，以及國際體系、國際社會及世界社會三個本體；第三、在美國實證主義的長期獨霸下，注重詮釋方法研究國際社會的英國學派是無法得到關注的。因此，這部分將從社會科學兩大陣營－實證主義及詮釋學著手，並進而帶入受實證主義籠罩的主流國際關係研究。本論文認為以實證主義研究具社會性的國際關係有其侷限，而多元、開放、重社會性的英國學派才能提供更完整的國際關係圖像。

本論文認為抱持多元開放、重視整體性、社會性、規範性的英國學派更能面對接踵而來的環境議題、全球化相關問題及人道干涉等全球性議題，如果正視國際關係也是社會關係的一部分，英國學派是能成為較適當的國際關係理論。
Social relations encompasses international relations so that the inquiry for international relations must embark on the historical, social, cultural context that states involved in. Otherwise we can’t envisage a comprehensive image of international relations. Under the dominance of positivism led by American international relations, English School, whose intellectual focus is International Society, has been neglected for a long period of time and immerged in the linear history.

For the sake of exploring English School, the thesis sets out three schemes. First, it retrospects the history, leading figures and label of English School. Second, it elucidates the arguments of English School, including the three ontologies- International System, International Society and World Society as well as three traditions, namely Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism. Third, beginning with the discuss of Positivism and Interpretivism, the author argues Positivism has its limitation in societal international relations. Consequently, it is English School, which tilts toward an open and diverse inclination, that can tell a better story.

The author concludes that English School that stresses on holism, society and social norms can take on the upcoming global issues, such as environmental issue, globalization and humanitarian intervention. If we square up to the fact that international relations is a part of social relations, English School can be a more adequate international relations theory.
參考文獻 一、 中文
(一) 專書
石之瑜。《政治學的知識脈絡》。台北：五南，2001年。
石之瑜。《後現代的知識脈絡》。台北：元照，2002年。
丘宏達，《現代國際法》。台北：三民，2000年。
孔恩(Thomas S. Kuhn)，《科學革命結構》。台北：遠流 ，1994年。
林碧炤。《國際政治與外交政策》。台北：五南，1997年。
倪世雄。《當代國際關係理論》。台北：五南，2003年。
賽班。《西洋政治思想史》（A History of Political Theory）。李少軍、尚新建譯。台北：桂冠，1997年。
Michel Foucault著，《知識的考掘》。王德威譯。台北：麥田，1993年。
(二)、期刊論文
秦亞青，〈國際政治的社會建構－溫特及其建構主義國際政治理論〉，美歐季刊，第十五卷第二期，2001年。
龐中英，〈開放式的自主發展：對英國國際關係理論的一項觀察—思考中國國際關係理論的方向〉，國際政治，2003年第9期 ，2003年9月。
(三)、碩博士論文
黃旻華。〈國際關係批判理論的重建與評論：科學實存論的觀點〉。國立中山大學政治學研究所，1998年5月。
(四)、研討會論文
姜家雄。〈國際關係中的英國學派〉。國際關係之理論與實踐學術研討會。國立政治大學外交系主辦，2003年7月5日。
李卓濤。〈英國學派的歷史考掘〉。國際關係研究生論文發表會。國立政治大學外交系主辦，2004年5月28日。
二、 英文
(一) 專書
Adler, Emanuel, and Beverly Crawford, eds. Progress in Postwar International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.
Alderson, Kai, and Andrew Hurrell, eds. Hedley Bull On International Society. Hampshire: Macmillan, 2000.
Baldwin, David A. ed. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debat . New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Barry, Brian, Jack Hayward, Archie Brown, eds. The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Bauer, Harry, and Elisabetta Brighi, eds. International Relations at LSE: A History of 75 Years. London: Millennium Publishing Group, 2003.
Baylis, John, and Steve Smith, eds. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Beer, Francis, and Robert Hariman. ed. Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1996.
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books, 1966.
Bernstein, Richard. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. London: Methuen, 1976.
Brown, Chris. Understanding International Relations. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1997.
Brown, Chris. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.
Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan, 1977.
Bull, Hedley, and Adam Watson. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.
Bull, Hedley, Benedict Kingsbury and Adam Roberts. Hugo Grotius and International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Burchill, Scott, ed. Theories of International Relations. Hampshire: Palgrave, 2001.
Butterfield, Herbert, and Martin Wight, eds. Diplomatic Investigation. London: Allen and Unwin,1966.
Buzan, Barry. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones and Richard Little. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
Carr, E.H. The Twenty Years` Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to The Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan, 1956.
Cox, Michael. E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave, 2000.
Czempid, Ernst- Otto, and James Rosenau, eds. Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges. Lexington: Lexington Book: 1989.
Delanty, Gerard. Social Science: Beyond Constructivism and Realism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
Dougherty, James, and Robert Pfaltzgraff. Contending Theories of International Relation: A Comprehensive Survey. New York: Longman, 2001.
Dunne, Tim. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London: Macmillan, 1998.
Dyer, Hugh, and L eon Mangasarian eds. The Study of International Relations: The State of The Art. New York: St. Martin`s, 1989.
Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.
Ferguson, Yale, and Richard Mansbach. The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1988.
Foot, Rosemary, John Lewis Gaddis and Andrew Hurrell, eds. Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
Fox, William, ed. Theoretical Aspects of International Relations. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1959.
Friedman, Gil, and Harvey Starr. Agency, Structure, and International Politics: From Ontology to Empirical Inquiry. London: Routledge, 1997.
George, Jim. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re) Introduction to International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Reinner, 1994.
Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of The Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
Griffiths, Martin. Realism, Idealism and International Politics: A Reinterpretation. London: Routledge, 1992.
Guzzini, Stefano. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy. London: Routledge, 1998.
Halliday, Fred. Rethinking International Relations. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1994.
Hobson, John. The State and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.

Hobson, John, ed. Historical Sociology of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)
Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.
Hollis, Martin. The Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Holsti, K.J., The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1985.
Hopf, Ted. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
Jackson, Robert H. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in A World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000
Jackson, Robert, and Geroge Sorenren. Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press, 1999.
Kaplan, Morton. System and Process in International Politics. New York: R. E. Krieger, 1957.
Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.
Keohane, Robert. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview, 1989.
Keohane, Robert. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.
Kerlinger, Fred. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1986.
Knorr, Klaus, and James Rosenau eds. Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.
Krasner, Stephen, ed. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.
Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Lakatos, Imre. The Methodology Of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
Lakatos, Imre, and Alan Musgrave, eds. Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Larkins, Jeremy, and Rick Fawn, eds. International Society After the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1996.
Lauterpacht, Elihu. ed. International Law: Being The Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Light, Margot, and A. Groom, eds. International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory. London: Frances Pinter, 1985.
Maghroori, Ray, and Bennett Ramberg. Globalism versus Realism: International Relations` Third Debate. Boulder: Westview, 1982.
Manning, Charles. The Nature of International Society. London: Macmillan, 1975.
Mayall, James, ed. The Community of States. London: Allen and Unwin, 1982.
Mayall, James. Nationalism and International Society. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Miller, J.D.B., and R.J. Vincent, eds. Order and Violence: Hedley Bull and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Morgenthau, Hans. Dilemmas of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
Nardin, Terry. Law, Morality and the Relations of States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.
Nardin, Terry and David Mapel, eds. Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Neumann, Iver, and Ole Wæver, eds. The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making? London: Routledge, 1997.
Pojman, Louis. What Can We Know?: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2001.
Osiander, Andreas. The State System of Europe, 1640-1990: Peacemaking and the Condition of International Stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Rawls, John. A theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.
Roberson, B.A. ed. International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. London: Pinter, 1998.
Rosenthal, Joel. Righteous Realist: Responsible Power and American Culture in the Nuclear Age. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1991.
Reus-Smit, Christian. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.
Scholte, Jan Aart. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.
Sylvester, Christine. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Smith, Steve, ed. International Relations: British and American Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.
Smith, Steve, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski, eds. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Smith, Steve, Ken Booth. International Relations Theory Today. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.
Thompson, Kenneth. Masters of International Thought. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1980.
Vincent, R. J. Foreign Policy and Human Rights: Issues and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Vincent, R. J. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
Walker, R.B.J. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.
Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
Watson, Adam. The Evolution of International Society. London: Routledge, 1992.
Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Wheeler, Nicholas. Saving Strange: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Wight, Martin. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977.
Wight, Martin. International Theory: The Three Traditions. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1996.
Winch, Peter. The Idea of A Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. New York: Humanities Press, 1958.
(二) 期刊論文
Adler, Emanuel. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3, no.3 (1997): 319-363.
Alker, Hayward and Thomas Biersteker, “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savior Faire.” International Studies Quarterly 28 (June 1984): 121-142
Ashley, Richard and R.B.J. Walker. “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 34 (September 1990):259-268.
Brown, Chris. “International Theory and International Society: The Viability of The Middle Way?” Review of International Studies 21 (April 1995): 183-196.
Brown, Chris. “International Political Theory－A British Social Science? ” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (April 2000): 114-123.
Bull, Hedley. “The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969.” In Brian Poter, ed., The Aberstwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.
Buzan, Barry. “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School.” International Organization 47 (Summer 1993): 327-352.
Buzan, Barry. “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 471-488.
Buzan, Barry and Richard Little. “Why International Relations has Failed as An Intellectual Project and What to Do About It.” Millennium 30, no.1 (2001): 19-39.
Clark, Ian. “Legitimacy in a Global Order.” Review of International Studies 29 (December 2003): 75-95.
Copeland, Dale. “A Realist Critique of the English School.” Review of International Studies 29 (July 2003): 427-441.
Cox, Robert. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium 10, no.2 (1981): 126-155.
Czaputowicz, Jacek. ”The English School of International Relations and Its Approach to European Integration.” Studies and Analyses 2, no.2 (2003): 3-55.
De Almeida, João M. “Challenging Realism by Returning to History: The British Committee`s Contribution to IR 40 Years On.” International Relations 17 (August 2003): 273-302.
Dessler, David. ”What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization 43 (Summer 1989): 441-473
Deutscher, Tamara. “E.H. Carr – A Personal Memoir.” New Left Review 137 (Jan./ Feb. 1983): 78-86.
Devlen, Balkan, Patrick James and Ozgur Ozdarmar. “The English School, International Relations and Progress.” International Studies Review 7(June 2005): 171-197.
Dunne, Timothy. “International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?” Cooperation and Conflict 30 (June 1995): 125-154.
Dunne, Timothy. “Mythology or Methodology?: Traditions in International Theory.” Review of International Studies 19 (July 1993): 305-318.
Dunne, Tim. “Sociological Investigations: Instrumental, Legitimist and Coercive Interpretations of International Society.” Millennium 30 (January 2001): 67-91.
Dunne, Tim. “New Thinking on International Society.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3 (June 2001): 223-244.
Dunne, Tim. “Society and Hierarchy in International Relations.” International Relations 17 (September 2003): 303-320.
Dunne, Timothy and Nicholas Wheeler. “Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will.” International Affairs 72, no.1 (1996): 91-107.
Epp, Roger. “The English School on the Frontiers of International Society: A Hermeneutic Recollection.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 47-63.
Evans, Tony and Peter Wilson. ”Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations: A Comparison.” Millennium 21, no.3 (1992): 329-351.
Fay, Brian and J. Donald Moon. “What Would an Adequate Philosophy of Social Science Look Like?” Philosophy of Social Science 7, no.3 (1977): 209-227.
Finnemore, Martha. “Exporting the English School?” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 509-513.
Fox, William. “E.H. Carr and Political Realism: Vision and Revision.” Review of International Studies 11 (January 1985): 1-16.
Grader, Sheila. “The English School of International Relations: Evidence and Evolution.” Review of International Studies 14 (January 1988):29-44.
Guzzini, Stefano. ”Calling For a Less ’Brandish’ and Less ‘Grand’ Reconvention.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 495-501.
Hall, Ian. “Still the English Patient?: Closures and Inventions in the English School.” International Affairs 77 (October 2001): 931-942.
Halliday, Fred. “The Pertinence of International Relations.” Political Studies 38 (September 1990): 502-516.
Halliday, Fred. “International Society as Homogeneity: Burke, Marx and Fukuyama.” Millennium 21 (December 1992): 435-61.
Henderson, Conway. “Investigating International Society.” Global Society 15 (October 2001): 415-423.
Hill, Christopher. “R.J. Vincent (1943-90).” Political Studies 39 (March 1991): 158-160.
Hoffman, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations,” Daedalus 106, no.3 (1977): 41-60.
Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith. ”Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 17 (October 1991): 393-410.
Hopf, Ted. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23 (Summer 1998): 181-185.
Howe, Paul. “The Utopian Realism of E.H. Carr.” Review of International Studies 20 (July 1994): 277-297.
Jackson, Robert. “Pluralism in International Political Theory.” Review of International Studies 18 (July 1992): 271-281.
James, Alan. “System or Society?” Review of International Studies 19, no.3 (1993): 269-288.
Jones, Charles. “Christian Realism and the Foundations of the English School.” International Relations 17 (September 2003): 371-387.
Jones, Roy. “The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure.” Review of International Studies 7 (January 1981): 1-13.
Kaplan, Morton. “The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations.” World Politics 19 (October 1966): 1-20.
Katzenstein, Peter, Robert Keohane and Stephen Krasner. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics.” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998): 675-678.
Kissolewski, Janine. “Norms in International Society: English School Meets Constructivism.” paper presented at British International Studies Association conference. Bradford, December 2000.
Knudsen, Tonny. “Theory of Society or Society of Theorists? With Tim Dunne in The English School.” Cooperation and Conflict 35 (June 2000): 193-203.
Lapid, Yosef . “The Third Debate: On The Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era.” International Studies Quarterly 33 (September 1989): 235-254.
Linklater, Andrew. “The Transformation of Political Community: E.H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations.” Review of International Studies 23 (July 1997): 321-338.
Lijphart, Arendt. “The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 18 (March 1974): 41-74.
Little, Richard. “Neorealism and the English School: A Methodological, Ontological and Theoretical Reassessment.” European Journal of International Relations 1, no.1 (1995): 9-34.
Little, Richard. “The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 6 (September 2000): 395-422.
Little, Richard. “The English School VS. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by A Common Language.” Review of International Studies 29 (July 2003): 443-460.
Lyons, Gene. ”The Study of International Relations in Great Britain.” World Politics 38 (July 1986): 626-645.
Neufeld, Mark. “Interpretation and the ‘Science’ of International Relations.” Review of International Studies 19 (January 1993): 39-61.
Neumann, Iver. ”The English School and the Practices of World Society.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 503-507.
Rengger, N.J. “A City Which Sustains All Things?: Communitarianism and International Society.” Millennium 21 (December 1992): 353-369.
Rengger, N.J. “Serpents and Doves in Classical International Theory.” Millennium 17 (June 1988): 215-225.
Reus-Smit, Christian “Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (October 2002): 487-509.
Rosenberg, Justin. “The International Imagination: IR Theory and ‘Classical Social Analysis’.” Millennium 23 (March 1994): 85-108.
Ruggie, John. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998): 880-882.
Shapcott, Richard. “Conversation and Coexistence: Gadamer and the Interpretatuon of International Society.” Millennium 23 (March 1994): 57-83.
Shapcott, Richard. “IR as Practical Philosophy: Defining A ‘Classic Approach’.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (August 2004): 271-291.
Shaw, Martin.“Global Society and Global Responsibility: The Theoretical, Historical and Political Limits of ‘International Society’.” Millennium 21, no.3 (1993): 421-434.
Smith, Steve. “The Forty Years Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations.” Millennium 21 (December 1992): 489-506.
Smith, Steve. “The Discipline of International Relations: Still An American Social Science?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (October 2000): 374-402.
Smith, Steve. “Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (September 2004): 499-515.
Strange, Susan. “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis.” International Organization 36 (Spring 1982): 479-496.
Suganami, Hidemi. “The Structure of Institutionalism: An Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations.” International Relations 7, no.5 (1983): 363-381.
Suganami, Hidemi. “A New Narrative, A New Subject? Tim Dunne on the "English School.” Cooperation and Conflict 35 (June 2000): 217-226.
Suganami, Hidemi. “C. A. W. Manning and the Study of International Relations.” Review of International Studies 27 (January 2001): 91-107.
Suganami, Hidemi. “Alexander Wendt and the English School.” Journal of International Relations and Development 4 (December 2001): 403-423.
Suganami, Hidemi. “British Institutionalists, or the English School, 20 Years On.” International Relations 17 (September 2003): 253-271.
Suganami, Hidemi. “The International Society Perspective on World Politics Reconsidered.” International Relations of the Asia Pacific 2 (February, 2002): 1-28.
Vincent, John. ” Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics.” Millennium 17, no.2 (1988): 195-213.
Watson, Adam. “Systems of States.” Review of International Studies 16 (April 1990): 99-109.
Watson, Adam. “Foreword.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 467-470.
Wæver, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998): 687-727.
Wæver, Ole. “Does the English School’s Via Media Equal the Contemporary Constructivist Middle Ground?” paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the British International Studies Association Manchester, 1999.
Wendt, Alexander. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (Summer 1987): 335-370.
Wendt, Alexander. ”Bridging the Theory/Meta-Theory Gap in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 17 (October 1991): 383-392.
Wendt, Alexander. ”Anarchy Is What States Make of It.” International Organization 46 (Spring 1992): 391-425.
Wight, Martin. “International Legitimacy. ” International Relations 4, no.1 (1972): 1-28.
Wight, Martin. “An Anatomy of International Thought.” Review of International Studies 13 (July 1987): 221-227.
Wilson, Peter. “The English School of International Relations: A Reply to Sheila Grader,” Review of International Studies 15 (January 1989): 51-52.
(三) 網路資源
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/polis/englishschool/
此網站為英國學派專屬學術網站
http://www.oup.co.uk/best.textbooks/politics/globalization2e/weblinks/
http://home.pi.be/~lazone/
http://workingpapers.org/interrelations.htm
http://csf.colorado.edu/isa/index.html
描述 碩士
國立政治大學
外交研究所
902530182
93
資料來源 http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902530182
資料類型 thesis
dc.contributor.advisor 姜家雄zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor Chiang, Alexen_US
dc.contributor.author (Authors) 李卓濤zh_TW
dc.contributor.author (Authors) Lee, Juo-Tauen_US
dc.creator (作者) 李卓濤zh_TW
dc.creator (作者) Lee, Juo-Tauen_US
dc.date (日期) 2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned 17-Sep-2009 17:52:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.available 17-Sep-2009 17:52:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.date.issued (上傳時間) 17-Sep-2009 17:52:08 (UTC+8)-
dc.identifier (Other Identifiers) G0902530182en_US
dc.identifier.uri (URI) https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33683-
dc.description (描述) 碩士zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 外交研究所zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 902530182zh_TW
dc.description (描述) 93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) 國際關係也是社會關係的一環，對國際關係的研究必須植基於國家涉入的歷史、社會、文化等層面進行探求，否則很難對國際關係有著全貌的了解。在美國學界的實證主義長期宰制下，研究國際社會的英國學派長期受到忽視，隱沒於線性發展的歷史中。

為了發掘英國學派受到忽視的地位，本論文擬從下三點著手。首先，回溯英國學派的歷史起源、代表學者、名稱問題；再者，耙梳、整理英國學派的學術內涵，包括現實主義、理性主義及革命主義三個傳統，以及國際體系、國際社會及世界社會三個本體；第三、在美國實證主義的長期獨霸下，注重詮釋方法研究國際社會的英國學派是無法得到關注的。因此，這部分將從社會科學兩大陣營－實證主義及詮釋學著手，並進而帶入受實證主義籠罩的主流國際關係研究。本論文認為以實證主義研究具社會性的國際關係有其侷限，而多元、開放、重社會性的英國學派才能提供更完整的國際關係圖像。

本論文認為抱持多元開放、重視整體性、社會性、規範性的英國學派更能面對接踵而來的環境議題、全球化相關問題及人道干涉等全球性議題，如果正視國際關係也是社會關係的一部分，英國學派是能成為較適當的國際關係理論。		zh_TW
dc.description.abstract (摘要) Social relations encompasses international relations so that the inquiry for international relations must embark on the historical, social, cultural context that states involved in. Otherwise we can’t envisage a comprehensive image of international relations. Under the dominance of positivism led by American international relations, English School, whose intellectual focus is International Society, has been neglected for a long period of time and immerged in the linear history.

For the sake of exploring English School, the thesis sets out three schemes. First, it retrospects the history, leading figures and label of English School. Second, it elucidates the arguments of English School, including the three ontologies- International System, International Society and World Society as well as three traditions, namely Realism, Rationalism and Revolutionism. Third, beginning with the discuss of Positivism and Interpretivism, the author argues Positivism has its limitation in societal international relations. Consequently, it is English School, which tilts toward an open and diverse inclination, that can tell a better story.

The author concludes that English School that stresses on holism, society and social norms can take on the upcoming global issues, such as environmental issue, globalization and humanitarian intervention. If we square up to the fact that international relations is a part of social relations, English School can be a more adequate international relations theory.		en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents 第一章 導論 1
第一節 研究動機與研究目的 1
第二節 文獻探討 5
第三節 研究範圍與研究限制 9
第四節 研究方法與論文架構 9

第二章 英國學派的歷史發展 12
第一節 英國學派的名稱及源頭 12
第二節 英國學派何以成一學派？ 22
第三節 誰屬於英國學派 27
第四節 英國學派的本質 30
第五節 英國學派與現實主義 32
小 結 36

第三章 英國學派的學術內容 39
第一節「三個傳統」 39
第二節 折衷媒介的國際社會 46
第三節 團結主義與多元主義 60
小 結 65

第四章 英國學派－較適當的國際關係理論？ 67
第一節 實證主義的傳統 67
第二派 詮釋學派 88 88
第三節 英國學派－只能在英國？ 88
小 結 104

第五章 結論 106

參考書目 116		zh_TW
dc.format.extent 46001 bytes-
dc.format.extent 92124 bytes-
dc.format.extent 70835 bytes-
dc.format.extent 73402 bytes-
dc.format.extent 204980 bytes-
dc.format.extent 337718 bytes-
dc.format.extent 339051 bytes-
dc.format.extent 423767 bytes-
dc.format.extent 174546 bytes-
dc.format.extent 126845 bytes-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf-
dc.language.iso en_US-
dc.source.uri (資料來源) http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0902530182en_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 英國學派zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 理性主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國際社會zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 現實主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 革命主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 國際體系zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 世界社會zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 實證主義zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) 詮釋學zh_TW
dc.subject (關鍵詞) English Schoolen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Rationalismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) International Societyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Realismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Revolutionismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) International Systemen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) World Societyen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Positivismen_US
dc.subject (關鍵詞) Interpretivismen_US
dc.title (題名) 英國學派-被忽視的國際關係理論zh_TW
dc.title (題名) English School- The Neglected International Relations Theoryen_US
dc.type (資料類型) thesisen
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 一、 中文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (一) 專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 石之瑜。《政治學的知識脈絡》。台北：五南，2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 石之瑜。《後現代的知識脈絡》。台北：元照，2002年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 丘宏達，《現代國際法》。台北：三民，2000年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 孔恩(Thomas S. Kuhn)，《科學革命結構》。台北：遠流 ，1994年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 林碧炤。《國際政治與外交政策》。台北：五南，1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 倪世雄。《當代國際關係理論》。台北：五南，2003年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 賽班。《西洋政治思想史》（A History of Political Theory）。李少軍、尚新建譯。台北：桂冠，1997年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Michel Foucault著，《知識的考掘》。王德威譯。台北：麥田，1993年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (二)、期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 秦亞青，〈國際政治的社會建構－溫特及其建構主義國際政治理論〉，美歐季刊，第十五卷第二期，2001年。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 龐中英，〈開放式的自主發展：對英國國際關係理論的一項觀察—思考中國國際關係理論的方向〉，國際政治，2003年第9期 ，2003年9月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (三)、碩博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 黃旻華。〈國際關係批判理論的重建與評論：科學實存論的觀點〉。國立中山大學政治學研究所，1998年5月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (四)、研討會論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 姜家雄。〈國際關係中的英國學派〉。國際關係之理論與實踐學術研討會。國立政治大學外交系主辦，2003年7月5日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 李卓濤。〈英國學派的歷史考掘〉。國際關係研究生論文發表會。國立政治大學外交系主辦，2004年5月28日。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 二、 英文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (一) 專書zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adler, Emanuel, and Beverly Crawford, eds. Progress in Postwar International Relations. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alderson, Kai, and Andrew Hurrell, eds. Hedley Bull On International Society. Hampshire: Macmillan, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baldwin, David A. ed. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debat . New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Barry, Brian, Jack Hayward, Archie Brown, eds. The British Study of Politics in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bauer, Harry, and Elisabetta Brighi, eds. International Relations at LSE: A History of 75 Years. London: Millennium Publishing Group, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Baylis, John, and Steve Smith, eds. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Beer, Francis, and Robert Hariman. ed. Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International Relations. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books, 1966.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bernstein, Richard. The Restructuring of Social and Political Theory. London: Methuen, 1976.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, Chris. Understanding International Relations. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, Chris. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bull, Hedley, and Adam Watson. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bull, Hedley, Benedict Kingsbury and Adam Roberts. Hugo Grotius and International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Burchill, Scott, ed. Theories of International Relations. Hampshire: Palgrave, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Butterfield, Herbert, and Martin Wight, eds. Diplomatic Investigation. London: Allen and Unwin,1966.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Buzan, Barry. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Buzan, Barry, Charles Jones and Richard Little. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Carr, E.H. The Twenty Years` Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to The Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan, 1956.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cox, Michael. E. H. Carr: A Critical Appraisal. New York: Palgrave, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Czempid, Ernst- Otto, and James Rosenau, eds. Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges. Lexington: Lexington Book: 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Delanty, Gerard. Social Science: Beyond Constructivism and Realism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dougherty, James, and Robert Pfaltzgraff. Contending Theories of International Relation: A Comprehensive Survey. New York: Longman, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dunne, Tim. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. London: Macmillan, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dyer, Hugh, and L eon Mangasarian eds. The Study of International Relations: The State of The Art. New York: St. Martin`s, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Finnemore, Martha. National Interests in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ferguson, Yale, and Richard Mansbach. The Elusive Quest: Theory and International Politics. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1988.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Foot, Rosemary, John Lewis Gaddis and Andrew Hurrell, eds. Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fox, William, ed. Theoretical Aspects of International Relations. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1959.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Friedman, Gil, and Harvey Starr. Agency, Structure, and International Politics: From Ontology to Empirical Inquiry. London: Routledge, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) George, Jim. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re) Introduction to International Relations. Boulder: Lynne Reinner, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of The Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Griffiths, Martin. Realism, Idealism and International Politics: A Reinterpretation. London: Routledge, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guzzini, Stefano. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy. London: Routledge, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, Fred. Rethinking International Relations. Vancouver: UBC Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hobson, John. The State and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hobson, John, ed. Historical Sociology of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hollis, Martin. The Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Holsti, K.J., The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hopf, Ted. Social Construction of International Politics: Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1955 and 1999. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jackson, Robert H. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in A World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jackson, Robert, and Geroge Sorenren. Introduction to International Relations. Oxford University Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kaplan, Morton. System and Process in International Politics. New York: R. E. Krieger, 1957.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview, 1989.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Keohane, Robert. Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kerlinger, Fred. Foundations of Behavioral Research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Knorr, Klaus, and James Rosenau eds. Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Krasner, Stephen, ed. International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lakatos, Imre. The Methodology Of Scientific Research Programmes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lakatos, Imre, and Alan Musgrave, eds. Criticism and The Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Larkins, Jeremy, and Rick Fawn, eds. International Society After the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered. Hampshire: Macmillan, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lauterpacht, Elihu. ed. International Law: Being The Collected Papers of Hersch Lauterpacht. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Light, Margot, and A. Groom, eds. International Relations: A Handbook of Current Theory. London: Frances Pinter, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Maghroori, Ray, and Bennett Ramberg. Globalism versus Realism: International Relations` Third Debate. Boulder: Westview, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Manning, Charles. The Nature of International Society. London: Macmillan, 1975.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mayall, James, ed. The Community of States. London: Allen and Unwin, 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Mayall, James. Nationalism and International Society. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Miller, J.D.B., and R.J. Vincent, eds. Order and Violence: Hedley Bull and International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Morgenthau, Hans. Dilemmas of Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nardin, Terry. Law, Morality and the Relations of States. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Nardin, Terry and David Mapel, eds. Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Neumann, Iver, and Ole Wæver, eds. The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making? London: Routledge, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Pojman, Louis. What Can We Know?: An Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. Belmont: Wadsworth, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Osiander, Andreas. The State System of Europe, 1640-1990: Peacemaking and the Condition of International Stability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rawls, John. A theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Roberson, B.A. ed. International Society and the Development of International Relations Theory. London: Pinter, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rosenthal, Joel. Righteous Realist: Responsible Power and American Culture in the Nuclear Age. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reus-Smit, Christian. The Moral Purpose of the State: Culture, Social Identity, and Institutional Rationality in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Scholte, Jan Aart. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Sylvester, Christine. Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Steve, ed. International Relations: British and American Perspectives. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Steve, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski, eds. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Steve, Ken Booth. International Relations Theory Today. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Thompson, Kenneth. Masters of International Thought. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1980.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vincent, R. J. Foreign Policy and Human Rights: Issues and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vincent, R. J. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Walker, R.B.J. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waltz, Kenneth. Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1979.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watson, Adam. The Evolution of International Society. London: Routledge, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wheeler, Nicholas. Saving Strange: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wight, Martin. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1977.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wight, Martin. International Theory: The Three Traditions. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Winch, Peter. The Idea of A Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. New York: Humanities Press, 1958.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (二) 期刊論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Adler, Emanuel. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 3, no.3 (1997): 319-363.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Alker, Hayward and Thomas Biersteker, “The Dialectics of World Order: Notes for a Future Archeologist of International Savior Faire.” International Studies Quarterly 28 (June 1984): 121-142zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ashley, Richard and R.B.J. Walker. “Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies.” International Studies Quarterly 34 (September 1990):259-268.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, Chris. “International Theory and International Society: The Viability of The Middle Way?” Review of International Studies 21 (April 1995): 183-196.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Brown, Chris. “International Political Theory－A British Social Science? ” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (April 2000): 114-123.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Bull, Hedley. “The Theory of International Politics, 1919-1969.” In Brian Poter, ed., The Aberstwyth Papers: International Politics 1919-1969. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Buzan, Barry. “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School.” International Organization 47 (Summer 1993): 327-352.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Buzan, Barry. “The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 471-488.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Buzan, Barry and Richard Little. “Why International Relations has Failed as An Intellectual Project and What to Do About It.” Millennium 30, no.1 (2001): 19-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Clark, Ian. “Legitimacy in a Global Order.” Review of International Studies 29 (December 2003): 75-95.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Copeland, Dale. “A Realist Critique of the English School.” Review of International Studies 29 (July 2003): 427-441.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Cox, Robert. “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory.” Millennium 10, no.2 (1981): 126-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Czaputowicz, Jacek. ”The English School of International Relations and Its Approach to European Integration.” Studies and Analyses 2, no.2 (2003): 3-55.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) De Almeida, João M. “Challenging Realism by Returning to History: The British Committee`s Contribution to IR 40 Years On.” International Relations 17 (August 2003): 273-302.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dessler, David. ”What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization 43 (Summer 1989): 441-473zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Deutscher, Tamara. “E.H. Carr – A Personal Memoir.” New Left Review 137 (Jan./ Feb. 1983): 78-86.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Devlen, Balkan, Patrick James and Ozgur Ozdarmar. “The English School, International Relations and Progress.” International Studies Review 7(June 2005): 171-197.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dunne, Timothy. “International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?” Cooperation and Conflict 30 (June 1995): 125-154.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dunne, Timothy. “Mythology or Methodology?: Traditions in International Theory.” Review of International Studies 19 (July 1993): 305-318.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dunne, Tim. “Sociological Investigations: Instrumental, Legitimist and Coercive Interpretations of International Society.” Millennium 30 (January 2001): 67-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dunne, Tim. “New Thinking on International Society.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3 (June 2001): 223-244.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dunne, Tim. “Society and Hierarchy in International Relations.” International Relations 17 (September 2003): 303-320.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Dunne, Timothy and Nicholas Wheeler. “Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will.” International Affairs 72, no.1 (1996): 91-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Epp, Roger. “The English School on the Frontiers of International Society: A Hermeneutic Recollection.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 47-63.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Evans, Tony and Peter Wilson. ”Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations: A Comparison.” Millennium 21, no.3 (1992): 329-351.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fay, Brian and J. Donald Moon. “What Would an Adequate Philosophy of Social Science Look Like?” Philosophy of Social Science 7, no.3 (1977): 209-227.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Finnemore, Martha. “Exporting the English School?” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 509-513.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Fox, William. “E.H. Carr and Political Realism: Vision and Revision.” Review of International Studies 11 (January 1985): 1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Grader, Sheila. “The English School of International Relations: Evidence and Evolution.” Review of International Studies 14 (January 1988):29-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Guzzini, Stefano. ”Calling For a Less ’Brandish’ and Less ‘Grand’ Reconvention.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 495-501.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hall, Ian. “Still the English Patient?: Closures and Inventions in the English School.” International Affairs 77 (October 2001): 931-942.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, Fred. “The Pertinence of International Relations.” Political Studies 38 (September 1990): 502-516.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Halliday, Fred. “International Society as Homogeneity: Burke, Marx and Fukuyama.” Millennium 21 (December 1992): 435-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Henderson, Conway. “Investigating International Society.” Global Society 15 (October 2001): 415-423.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hill, Christopher. “R.J. Vincent (1943-90).” Political Studies 39 (March 1991): 158-160.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hoffman, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations,” Daedalus 106, no.3 (1977): 41-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hollis, Martin and Steve Smith. ”Beware of Gurus: Structure and Action in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 17 (October 1991): 393-410.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Hopf, Ted. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory.” International Security 23 (Summer 1998): 181-185.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Howe, Paul. “The Utopian Realism of E.H. Carr.” Review of International Studies 20 (July 1994): 277-297.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jackson, Robert. “Pluralism in International Political Theory.” Review of International Studies 18 (July 1992): 271-281.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) James, Alan. “System or Society?” Review of International Studies 19, no.3 (1993): 269-288.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, Charles. “Christian Realism and the Foundations of the English School.” International Relations 17 (September 2003): 371-387.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Jones, Roy. “The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure.” Review of International Studies 7 (January 1981): 1-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kaplan, Morton. “The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations.” World Politics 19 (October 1966): 1-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Katzenstein, Peter, Robert Keohane and Stephen Krasner. “International Organization and the Study of World Politics.” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998): 675-678.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Kissolewski, Janine. “Norms in International Society: English School Meets Constructivism.” paper presented at British International Studies Association conference. Bradford, December 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Knudsen, Tonny. “Theory of Society or Society of Theorists? With Tim Dunne in The English School.” Cooperation and Conflict 35 (June 2000): 193-203.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lapid, Yosef . “The Third Debate: On The Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era.” International Studies Quarterly 33 (September 1989): 235-254.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Linklater, Andrew. “The Transformation of Political Community: E.H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations.” Review of International Studies 23 (July 1997): 321-338.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lijphart, Arendt. “The Structure of the Theoretical Revolution in International Relations.” International Studies Quarterly 18 (March 1974): 41-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Little, Richard. “Neorealism and the English School: A Methodological, Ontological and Theoretical Reassessment.” European Journal of International Relations 1, no.1 (1995): 9-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Little, Richard. “The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 6 (September 2000): 395-422.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Little, Richard. “The English School VS. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by A Common Language.” Review of International Studies 29 (July 2003): 443-460.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Lyons, Gene. ”The Study of International Relations in Great Britain.” World Politics 38 (July 1986): 626-645.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Neufeld, Mark. “Interpretation and the ‘Science’ of International Relations.” Review of International Studies 19 (January 1993): 39-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Neumann, Iver. ”The English School and the Practices of World Society.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 503-507.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rengger, N.J. “A City Which Sustains All Things?: Communitarianism and International Society.” Millennium 21 (December 1992): 353-369.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rengger, N.J. “Serpents and Doves in Classical International Theory.” Millennium 17 (June 1988): 215-225.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Reus-Smit, Christian “Imagining Society: Constructivism and the English School.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (October 2002): 487-509.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Rosenberg, Justin. “The International Imagination: IR Theory and ‘Classical Social Analysis’.” Millennium 23 (March 1994): 85-108.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Ruggie, John. “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge.” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998): 880-882.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shapcott, Richard. “Conversation and Coexistence: Gadamer and the Interpretatuon of International Society.” Millennium 23 (March 1994): 57-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shapcott, Richard. “IR as Practical Philosophy: Defining A ‘Classic Approach’.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (August 2004): 271-291.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Shaw, Martin.“Global Society and Global Responsibility: The Theoretical, Historical and Political Limits of ‘International Society’.” Millennium 21, no.3 (1993): 421-434.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Steve. “The Forty Years Detour: The Resurgence of Normative Theory in International Relations.” Millennium 21 (December 1992): 489-506.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Steve. “The Discipline of International Relations: Still An American Social Science?” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (October 2000): 374-402.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Smith, Steve. “Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September 11.” International Studies Quarterly 48 (September 2004): 499-515.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Strange, Susan. “Cave! Hic Dragones: A Critique of Regime Analysis.” International Organization 36 (Spring 1982): 479-496.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suganami, Hidemi. “The Structure of Institutionalism: An Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations.” International Relations 7, no.5 (1983): 363-381.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suganami, Hidemi. “A New Narrative, A New Subject? Tim Dunne on the "English School.” Cooperation and Conflict 35 (June 2000): 217-226.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suganami, Hidemi. “C. A. W. Manning and the Study of International Relations.” Review of International Studies 27 (January 2001): 91-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suganami, Hidemi. “Alexander Wendt and the English School.” Journal of International Relations and Development 4 (December 2001): 403-423.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suganami, Hidemi. “British Institutionalists, or the English School, 20 Years On.” International Relations 17 (September 2003): 253-271.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Suganami, Hidemi. “The International Society Perspective on World Politics Reconsidered.” International Relations of the Asia Pacific 2 (February, 2002): 1-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Vincent, John. ” Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics.” Millennium 17, no.2 (1988): 195-213.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watson, Adam. “Systems of States.” Review of International Studies 16 (April 1990): 99-109.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Watson, Adam. “Foreword.” Review of International Studies 27 (July 2001): 467-470.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wæver, Ole. “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations.” International Organization 52 (Autumn 1998): 687-727.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wæver, Ole. “Does the English School’s Via Media Equal the Contemporary Constructivist Middle Ground?” paper presented at the 24th annual conference of the British International Studies Association Manchester, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wendt, Alexander. “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory.” International Organization 41 (Summer 1987): 335-370.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wendt, Alexander. ”Bridging the Theory/Meta-Theory Gap in International Relations.” Review of International Studies 17 (October 1991): 383-392.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wendt, Alexander. ”Anarchy Is What States Make of It.” International Organization 46 (Spring 1992): 391-425.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wight, Martin. “International Legitimacy. ” International Relations 4, no.1 (1972): 1-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wight, Martin. “An Anatomy of International Thought.” Review of International Studies 13 (July 1987): 221-227.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) Wilson, Peter. “The English School of International Relations: A Reply to Sheila Grader,” Review of International Studies 15 (January 1989): 51-52.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) (三) 網路資源zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.leeds.ac.uk/polis/englishschool/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) 此網站為英國學派專屬學術網站zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://www.oup.co.uk/best.textbooks/politics/globalization2e/weblinks/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://home.pi.be/~lazone/zh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://workingpapers.org/interrelations.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference (參考文獻) http://csf.colorado.edu/isa/index.htmlzh_TW